TheoremBase

The periodised kernel turns the convolution into an integral over the cell, Tonelli's theorem on the cell squared exchanges the order of integration, and Hoelder's inequality splits the kernel between the two factors. Convergence of the mollifications follows by comparison with a nearby continuous periodic function, and density of the smooth periodic functions is then immediate.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement of this theorem. Let Ψ\Psi be the periodised kernel of ψ\psi, and for x,y∈Rnx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} let Ψx\Psi_{x} and Ψy\Psi^{y} be the restrictions to QQ of Ψ(x,⋅)\Psi(x,\cdot) and of Ψ(⋅,y)\Psi(\cdot,y), each in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with integral of absolute value at most KK by that clause. We use repeatedly that for an integrable gg one has −∣g∣≤g≤∣g∣-|g|\le g\le|g| pointwise by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, hence by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field,

∣∫g dμ∣≤∫∣g∣ dμ.(∗)\Bigl|\int g\,d\mu\Bigr|\le\int|g|\,d\mu. \tag{$\ast$}

We also use that λQ(Q)=1\lambda_{Q}(Q)=1, from The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iii).

Step 0. A measurable nonnegative integrand on the product.

Let u∈Lp(Tn)u\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). By The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (iv) the map uu lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), so The Periodised Kernel of a Periodic Convolution (v) applies and gives

(ψ⋆u)(x)=∫TnΨx u dy(x∈Rn).(\psi\star u)(x)=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\Psi_{x}\,u\,dy\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}).

The second projection (x,y)↦y(x,y)\mapsto y from Q×QQ\times Q to QQ is measurable with respect to BQ⊗BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}\otimes\mathcal{B}_{Q} and BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}, since the preimage of A∈BQA\in\mathcal{B}_{Q} is the measurable rectangle Q×AQ\times A, a member of the product σ\sigma-algebra by Measurable Rectangles and the Product σ-Algebra. Hence (x,y)↦u(y)(x,y)\mapsto u(y) is measurable with respect to BQ⊗BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}\otimes\mathcal{B}_{Q}. The restriction of Ψ\Psi to Q×QQ\times Q is measurable with respect to the same σ\sigma-algebra by The Periodised Kernel of a Periodic Convolution (vi). Consequently, by Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and claim 4 of that lemma, the maps

(x,y)↦∣Ψ(x,y)∣ ∣u(y)∣and(x,y)↦∣Ψ(x,y)∣ (∣u(y)∣)p(x,y)\mapsto|\Psi(x,y)|\,|u(y)|\qquad\text{and}\qquad(x,y)\mapsto|\Psi(x,y)|\,\bigl(|u(y)|\bigr)^{p}

are measurable with respect to BQ⊗BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}\otimes\mathcal{B}_{Q} and take values in [0,∞)[0,\infty), the second using Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i) for measurability of ∣u∣p|u|^{p}. The measure λQ\lambda_{Q} is finite, hence σ\sigma-finite, so Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems applies to (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) in both variables.

Step 1. Proof of claim 1.

That (ψ⋆u)∣Q(\psi\star u)|_{Q} lies in Lp(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is Properties of Periodic Convolution on the Torus (iv). It remains to prove the inequality. By the representation of step 0, by (∗)(\ast), and by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field,

∣(ψ⋆u)(x)∣≤∫Tn∣Ψ(x,y)∣ ∣u(y)∣ dy(x∈Q).(1)|(\psi\star u)(x)|\le\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|\Psi(x,y)|\,|u(y)|\,dy\qquad(x\in Q). \tag{1}

The case p=1p=1. Integrating (1) over QQ, using claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion for monotonicity and then the Tonelli identity of Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems to exchange the order,

∫Tn∣(ψ⋆u)∣Q∣ dx≤∫Q(∫Q∣Ψ(x,y)∣ ∣u(y)∣ dλQ(y))dλQ(x)=∫Q∣u(y)∣(∫Q∣Ψy∣ dλQ)dλQ(y).\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\bigl|(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\bigr|\,dx\le\int_{Q}\Bigl(\int_{Q}|\Psi(x,y)|\,|u(y)|\,d\lambda_{Q}(y)\Bigr)d\lambda_{Q}(x)=\int_{Q}|u(y)|\Bigl(\int_{Q}|\Psi^{y}|\,d\lambda_{Q}\Bigr)d\lambda_{Q}(y).

By The Periodised Kernel of a Periodic Convolution (iv) the inner integral is at most KK, so by monotonicity again the right-hand side is at most K∥u∥1K\lVert u\rVert_{1}. Since ∥u∥1=∫Q∣u∣ dλQ\lVert u\rVert_{1}=\int_{Q}|u|\,d\lambda_{Q} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii) and Properties of Real Powers (ii), this is the asserted inequality for p=1p=1.

The case 1<p1<p. Let qq be the conjugate exponent of pp, so 1/p+1/q=11/p+1/q=1. Fix x∈Qx\in Q and put, on QQ,

a=∣Ψx∣1/q,b=∣Ψx∣1/p ∣u∣.a=|\Psi_{x}|^{1/q},\qquad b=|\Psi_{x}|^{1/p}\,|u| .

By Properties of Real Powers (vi) we have aq=∣Ψx∣a^{q}=|\Psi_{x}| and bp=∣Ψx∣ ∣u∣pb^{p}=|\Psi_{x}|\,|u|^{p}, the latter also using Properties of Real Powers (iii). Both aa and bb are measurable by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i) and Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps. Now ∫Qaq dλQ=∫Q∣Ψx∣ dλQ≤K<∞\int_{Q}a^{q}\,d\lambda_{Q}=\int_{Q}|\Psi_{x}|\,d\lambda_{Q}\le K<\infty, so a∈Lq(Tn)a\in\mathcal{L}^{q}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with ∥a∥q≤K1/q\lVert a\rVert_{q}\le K^{1/q} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii) and Properties of Real Powers (v); and Ψ(x,⋅)\Psi(x,\cdot) is bounded, say by M′M', being a member of CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by The Periodised Kernel of a Periodic Convolution (iii) and bounded by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions (iii), so ∫Qbp dλQ≤M′∫Q∣u∣p dλQ<∞\int_{Q}b^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}\le M'\int_{Q}|u|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}<\infty and b∈Lp(Tn)b\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

The pointwise product satisfies a b=∣Ψx∣1/q∣Ψx∣1/p∣u∣=∣Ψx∣ ∣u∣a\,b=|\Psi_{x}|^{1/q}|\Psi_{x}|^{1/p}|u|=|\Psi_{x}|\,|u|, by Properties of Real Powers (iv) with 1/q+1/p=11/q+1/p=1, followed by Properties of Real Powers (ii), which gives t1=tt^{1}=t for nonnegative tt. Applying Hölder's Inequality (i) to the conjugate pair q,pq,p and the functions a∈Lqa\in\mathcal{L}^{q}, b∈Lpb\in\mathcal{L}^{p},

∫Q∣Ψx∣ ∣u∣ dλQ=∥a b∥1≤∥a∥q ∥b∥p≤K1/q(∫Q∣Ψx∣ ∣u∣p dλQ)1/p.\int_{Q}|\Psi_{x}|\,|u|\,d\lambda_{Q}=\lVert a\,b\rVert_{1}\le\lVert a\rVert_{q}\,\lVert b\rVert_{p}\le K^{1/q}\Bigl(\int_{Q}|\Psi_{x}|\,|u|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}\Bigr)^{1/p}.

Combining with (1) and raising to the power pp, which preserves the inequality by Properties of Real Powers (v), and using Properties of Real Powers (iii) and Properties of Real Powers (vi),

(∣(ψ⋆u)(x)∣)p≤Kp/q∫Q∣Ψ(x,y)∣ ∣u(y)∣p dλQ(y)(x∈Q).\bigl(|(\psi\star u)(x)|\bigr)^{p}\le K^{p/q}\int_{Q}|\Psi(x,y)|\,|u(y)|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}(y)\qquad(x\in Q).

Integrating over x∈Qx\in Q, using monotonicity and then the Tonelli identity of Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems and The Periodised Kernel of a Periodic Convolution (iv) as in the case p=1p=1,

∫Q∣(ψ⋆u)∣Q∣p dλQ≤Kp/q∫Q∣u(y)∣p(∫Q∣Ψy∣ dλQ)dλQ(y)≤Kp/q⋅K⋅(∥u∥p)p.\int_{Q}\bigl|(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\bigr|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}\le K^{p/q}\int_{Q}|u(y)|^{p}\Bigl(\int_{Q}|\Psi^{y}|\,d\lambda_{Q}\Bigr)d\lambda_{Q}(y)\le K^{p/q}\cdot K\cdot\bigl(\lVert u\rVert_{p}\bigr)^{p}.

Since p/q+1=p(1−1/p)+1=pp/q+1=p(1-1/p)+1=p, Properties of Real Powers (ii), which identifies KK with K1K^{1}, together with Properties of Real Powers (iv) gives Kp/q⋅K=KpK^{p/q}\cdot K=K^{p}, so the right-hand side is (K∥u∥p)p\bigl(K\lVert u\rVert_{p}\bigr)^{p} by Properties of Real Powers (iii). Taking the power 1/p1/p of both sides, which preserves the inequality by Properties of Real Powers (v), and using Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii) together with Properties of Real Powers (vi), we obtain ∥(ψ⋆u)∣Q∥p≤K∥u∥p\lVert(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\rVert_{p}\le K\lVert u\rVert_{p}.

Step 2. Proof of claim 2.

By Rescaling a Mollifier Kernel the map ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} is a mollifier kernel of radius εδ\varepsilon\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. By the nonnegativity and unit-mass conditions of Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, together with claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the constant KK attached to the kernel ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} by The Periodised Kernel of a Periodic Convolution (i) equals ∫Rnρε dλn=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho_{\varepsilon}\,d\lambda_{n}=1.

Let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<η0<\eta. The numbers η/3\eta/3 and η/2\eta/2 are positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 7 of the same lemma. By Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus (iv) the set of classes [w∣Q][w|_{Q}] with w∈Cperw\in C_{\mathrm{per}} is dense in Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), so by Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls the open ball of centre [u][u] and radius η/3\eta/3 in Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) meets it: there is w∈Cperw\in C_{\mathrm{per}} with ∥[w∣Q]−[u]∥Lp(Tn)<η/3\lVert[w|_{Q}]-[u]\rVert_{L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n})}<\eta/3, that is, ∥w∣Q−u∥p<η/3\lVert w|_{Q}-u\rVert_{p}<\eta/3 by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (iii).

By A Continuous Lattice-Periodic Function is Uniformly Continuous (i), applied to ww with the tolerance η/3\eta/3, there is a real rr with 0<r0<r such that ∣w(x)−w(z)∣≤η/3|w(x)-w(z)|\le\eta/3 whenever ∥x−z∥≤r\lVert x-z\rVert\le r. Put ε0=r/δ\varepsilon_{0}=r/\delta, a positive real by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and let ε\varepsilon be real with 0<ε<ε00<\varepsilon<\varepsilon_{0}, so that εδ<r\varepsilon\delta<r.

By Minkowski's Inequality (i), applied twice,

∥(ρε⋆u)∣Q−u∥p≤∥(ρε⋆u)∣Q−(ρε⋆(w∣Q))∣Q∥p+∥(ρε⋆(w∣Q))∣Q−w∣Q∥p+∥w∣Q−u∥p.\bigl\lVert(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u)|_{Q}-u\bigr\rVert_{p}\le \bigl\lVert(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u)|_{Q}-\bigl(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)|_{Q}\bigr\rVert_{p} +\bigl\lVert\bigl(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)|_{Q}-w|_{Q}\bigr\rVert_{p} +\bigl\lVert w|_{Q}-u\bigr\rVert_{p}.

For the first summand, w∣Q∈Lp(Tn)w|_{Q}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus (i), and Properties of Periodic Convolution on the Torus (iii) with the scalar −1-1 gives ρε⋆u−ρε⋆(w∣Q)=ρε⋆(u−w∣Q)\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u-\rho_{\varepsilon}\star(w|_{Q})=\rho_{\varepsilon}\star(u-w|_{Q}); by claim 1 of this theorem, applied to the kernel ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} whose constant is 11, that summand is at most ∥u−w∣Q∥p<η/3\lVert u-w|_{Q}\rVert_{p}<\eta/3.

For the second summand, Properties of Periodic Convolution on the Torus (v), applied to the mollifier kernel ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} of radius εδ\varepsilon\delta and to ww with the bound η/3\eta/3 — legitimate because ∥x−z∥≤εδ\lVert x-z\rVert\le\varepsilon\delta implies ∥x−z∥≤r\lVert x-z\rVert\le r and hence ∣w(x)−w(z)∣≤η/3|w(x)-w(z)|\le\eta/3 — gives

∣(ρε⋆(w∣Q))(x)−w(x)∣≤η/3(x∈Rn).\bigl|\bigl(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)(x)-w(x)\bigr|\le\eta/3\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Writing t=η/3t=\eta/3, the difference h=(ρε⋆(w∣Q))∣Q−w∣Qh=\bigl(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)|_{Q}-w|_{Q} therefore satisfies ∣h∣≤t|h|\le t on QQ, so ∣h∣p≤tp|h|^{p}\le t^{p} by Properties of Real Powers (v) and

∫Q∣h∣p dλQ≤tpλQ(Q)=tp\int_{Q}|h|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}\le t^{p}\lambda_{Q}(Q)=t^{p}

by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set; hence ∥h∥p≤(tp)1/p=t=η/3\lVert h\rVert_{p}\le(t^{p})^{1/p}=t=\eta/3 by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii), Properties of Real Powers (v) and Properties of Real Powers (vi).

The third summand is less than η/3\eta/3. Adding the three bounds gives ∥(ρε⋆u)∣Q−u∥p≤η\lVert(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u)|_{Q}-u\rVert_{p}\le\eta, as asserted.

For the final sentence, let η\eta be a positive real and let ε0\varepsilon_{0} be as above. By The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is a natural number k0k_{0} with 1/ε0<k01/\varepsilon_{0}<k_{0}, hence 1/k0<ε01/k_{0}<\varepsilon_{0} by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. For every natural kk with k0≤kk_{0}\le k we have 0<1/k≤1/k0<ε00<1/k\le1/k_{0}<\varepsilon_{0}, so

∥[(ρ1/k⋆u)∣Q]−[u]∥Lp(Tn)=∥(ρ1/k⋆u)∣Q−u∥p≤η,\bigl\lVert[(\rho_{1/k}\star u)|_{Q}]-[u]\bigr\rVert_{L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n})}=\bigl\lVert(\rho_{1/k}\star u)|_{Q}-u\bigr\rVert_{p}\le\eta ,

using The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (iii). As η\eta was an arbitrary positive real, the sequence of these classes converges to [u][u] in Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

Step 3. Proof of claim 3.

By Existence of Mollifier Kernels of Every Radius there is a mollifier kernel ρ\rho of radius 11 on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. Let c∈Lp(Tn)c\in L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and let θ\theta be a positive real; choose a representative u∈Lp(Tn)u\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with [u]=c[u]=c, which exists by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (i). By claim 2, applied with η=θ/2\eta=\theta/2, there is a positive real ε\varepsilon with ∥(ρε⋆u)∣Q−u∥p≤θ/2<θ\lVert(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u)|_{Q}-u\rVert_{p}\le\theta/2<\theta. The kernel ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} is smooth by Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Rescaling a Mollifier Kernel, so ρε⋆u∈Cper∞\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} by Properties of Periodic Convolution on the Torus (i). Hence the open ball of centre cc and radius θ\theta in Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) contains the class [(ρε⋆u)∣Q][(\rho_{\varepsilon}\star u)|_{Q}], a member of {[w∣Q]:w∈Cper∞}\{[w|_{Q}]:w\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}\}. As cc and θ\theta were arbitrary, Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls gives that the closure of that set is all of Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), that is, the set is dense. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…