TheoremBase

Writes the rescaled head as a diagonal linear map after the coordinate map and the lift as a finite combination of the orthonormal noise basis, which gives continuity and the moment bound, the pointwise noise-norm and inner-product identities, the shift identities, and the isometry by change of variables. The chain rule identifies the lift of a test-function gradient with a noise gradient of a cylindrical function, and closures pass through the isometry by sequential characterization.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary arithmetic and order of real numbers, including finite sums, squares and square roots, is used through The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background without further citation. On Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} we use dE(u,v)=∥u−v∥d_{E}(u,v)=\lVert u-v\rVert by Euclidean Space and Lebesgue Measure: Standing Notation §space, ∥u∥2=∑k=1nuk2\lVert u\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}^{2} by Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and u⋅v=∑k=1nukvku\cdot v=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}v_{k} by Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n; on XX, d(x,x′)=∣x−x′∣d(x,x')=|x-x'| by Real Inner Product Space §distance.

Notation. Every aka_{k} is positive by Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §weights, and ak≤aˉa_{k}\le\bar{a} with aˉ\bar{a} positive. By Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, ak1/2a_{k}^{1/2} is positive with (ak1/2)2=ak(a_{k}^{1/2})^{2}=a_{k}, so ak−1(ak1/2)2=1a_{k}^{-1}(a_{k}^{1/2})^{2}=1, (ak−1/2)2=ak−1(a_{k}^{-1/2})^{2}=a_{k}^{-1} and ak ak−1/2=ak1/2a_{k}\,a_{k}^{-1/2}=a_{k}^{1/2}. Put m=∑k=1nak−1m=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{-1}; as every ak−1a_{k}^{-1} is positive, ak−1≤ma_{k}^{-1}\le m for k≤nk\le n. Define R,D+:Rn→RnR,D_{+}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} by

R(u)=(a1−1/2u1,…,an−1/2un),D+(v)=(a11/2v1,…,an1/2vn),R(u)=\bigl(a_{1}^{-1/2}u_{1},\dots,a_{n}^{-1/2}u_{n}\bigr),\qquad D_{+}(v)=\bigl(a_{1}^{1/2}v_{1},\dots,a_{n}^{1/2}v_{n}\bigr),

so that rn=R∘pnr_{n}=R\circ p_{n} with pnp_{n} of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let fk=ak1/2ekf_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}e_{k}. For a Borel η:Rn→Rn\eta:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} and x∈Xx\in X, the definition of pn∗p_{n}^{*} in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates and the identity ak1/2ηk(rn(x)) ek=ηk(rn(x)) fka_{k}^{1/2}\eta_{k}(r_{n}(x))\,e_{k}=\eta_{k}(r_{n}(x))\,f_{k} give

Λnη(x)=pn∗(D+(η(rn(x))))=∑k=1nηk(rn(x)) fk.(0)\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)=p_{n}^{*}\Bigl(D_{+}\bigl(\eta(r_{n}(x))\bigr)\Bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\eta_{k}\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\,f_{k}.\qquad(0)

Step 1 (Claim 1). For u,u′∈Rnu,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{n},

∥R(u)−R(u′)∥2=∑k=1nak−1(uk−uk′)2≤m ∥u−u′∥2,∥D+(u)−D+(u′)∥2=∑k=1nak(uk−uk′)2≤aˉ ∥u−u′∥2,\lVert R(u)-R(u')\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{-1}(u_{k}-u'_{k})^{2}\le m\,\lVert u-u'\rVert^{2},\qquad \lVert D_{+}(u)-D_{+}(u')\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}(u_{k}-u'_{k})^{2}\le\bar{a}\,\lVert u-u'\rVert^{2},

and in particular ∥R(u)∥2≤m∥u∥2\lVert R(u)\rVert^{2}\le m\lVert u\rVert^{2}. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, ∥pn(x)−pn(x′)∥≤∣x−x′∣\lVert p_{n}(x)-p_{n}(x')\rVert\le|x-x'| for x,x′∈Xx,x'\in X, hence ∥rn(x)−rn(x′)∥≤m ∣x−x′∣\lVert r_{n}(x)-r_{n}(x')\rVert\le\sqrt{m}\,|x-x'|. Thus RR, D+D_{+} and rnr_{n} are Lipschitz with constants m\sqrt{m}, aˉ\sqrt{\bar{a}} and m\sqrt{m}, hence continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. So μ~\tilde{\mu} is defined; here and below, every fact about push-forward measures is read through Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward. By claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, μ~\tilde{\mu} is a probability measure on the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}), which is B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces; so μ~∈P(Rn)\tilde{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures. For x∈Xx\in X, Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity gives

∥rn(x)∥2≤m ∥pn(x)∥2=m ∣Pnx∣2≤m(∣Pnx∣2+∣Qnx∣2)=m ∣x∣2.\lVert r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}\le m\,\lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}=m\,|P_{n}x|^{2}\le m\bigl(|P_{n}x|^{2}+|Q_{n}x|^{2}\bigr)=m\,|x|^{2}.

The function u↦∥u∥2u\mapsto\lVert u\rVert^{2} is nonnegative and Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs, and x↦∥rn(x)∥2x\mapsto\lVert r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2} is Borel as a composition of Borel maps by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, so the change of variables of claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, the monotonicity and homogeneity of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, and The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space give

∫Rn∥u∥2 μ~(du)=∫X∥rn(x)∥2 μ(dx)≤m∫X∣x∣2 μ(dx)=m M2(μ)<∞.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}(du)=\int_{X}\lVert r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)\le m\int_{X}|x|^{2}\,\mu(dx)=m\,M_{2}(\mu)<\infty .

By The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment and The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space, μ~∈P2(Rn)\tilde{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Step 2 (Pointwise structure of the lift). Let η:Rn→Rn\eta:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be Borel, x∈Xx\in X and y=D+(η(rn(x)))y=D_{+}(\eta(r_{n}(x))), so Λnη(x)=pn∗(y)\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)=p_{n}^{*}(y) by (0). This is a linear combination of e1,…,ene_{1},\dots,e_{n}, so Λnη(x)∈Xn\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)\in X_{n} by Span of a Finite Family of Vectors and Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, pn(Λnη(x))=pn(pn∗(y))=yp_{n}(\Lambda_{n}\eta(x))=p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(y))=y: for k≤nk\le n the kk-th coordinate of Λnη(x)\Lambda_{n}\eta(x) is ak1/2ηk(rn(x))a_{k}^{1/2}\eta_{k}(r_{n}(x)); and PnΛnη(x)=pn∗(pn(pn∗(y)))=pn∗(y)P_{n}\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)=p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(y)))=p_{n}^{*}(y), so QnΛnη(x)=0XQ_{n}\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)=0_{X}. By The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert, XaX^{a} is a linear subspace of XX carrying the restricted operations, and by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis each fkf_{k} lies in XaX^{a} and (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is an orthonormal basis of XaX^{a}, in particular an orthonormal sequence. Hence Λnη(x)∈Xa\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)\in X^{a} by (0). For Borel ξ,η\xi,\eta, additivity, homogeneity and symmetry of ⟨⋅,⋅⟩a\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{a} (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product) and orthonormality give, from (0),

⟨Λnξ(x),Λnη(x)⟩a=∑k=1n∑j=1nξk(rn(x))ηj(rn(x))⟨fk,fj⟩a=ξ(rn(x))⋅η(rn(x)),(1)\bigl\langle\Lambda_{n}\xi(x),\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)\bigr\rangle_{a}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\xi_{k}\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\eta_{j}\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\langle f_{k},f_{j}\rangle_{a}=\xi\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\cdot\eta\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr),\qquad(1)

and taking ξ=η\xi=\eta, by Real Inner Product Space §norm, ∣Λnη(x)∣a2=∥η(rn(x))∥2|\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)|_{a}^{2}=\lVert\eta(r_{n}(x))\rVert^{2}.

Step 3 (Claim 3). Let η\eta be Borel and x∈Xx\in X, and write z=Λnη(x)z=\Lambda_{n}\eta(x). Additivity of ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product) gives ⟨x+z,ek⟩=xk+zk\langle x+z,e_{k}\rangle=x_{k}+z_{k}, so by Step 2, for k≤nk\le n, the kk-th coordinate of rn(x+z)r_{n}(x+z) is ak−1/2(xk+ak1/2ηk(rn(x)))=ak−1/2xk+ηk(rn(x))a_{k}^{-1/2}\bigl(x_{k}+a_{k}^{1/2}\eta_{k}(r_{n}(x))\bigr)=a_{k}^{-1/2}x_{k}+\eta_{k}(r_{n}(x)), which is the kk-th coordinate of rn(x)+η(rn(x))r_{n}(x)+\eta(r_{n}(x)). Further pn(x+z)=pn(x)+pn(z)p_{n}(x+z)=p_{n}(x)+p_{n}(z) by the same additivity, and pn∗p_{n}^{*} is additive by its definition, so Pn(x+z)=Pnx+PnzP_{n}(x+z)=P_{n}x+P_{n}z and Qn(x+z)=Qnx+Qnz=QnxQ_{n}(x+z)=Q_{n}x+Q_{n}z=Q_{n}x, using Qnz=0XQ_{n}z=0_{X} from Step 2.

Step 4 (Claim 2). Let η\eta be Borel with ∫Rn∥η∥2 dμ~<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\tilde{\mu}<\infty. By (0), Λnη=pn∗∘D+∘η∘rn\Lambda_{n}\eta=p_{n}^{*}\circ D_{+}\circ\eta\circ r_{n}, a composition of Borel maps (pn∗p_{n}^{*} by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, D+D_{+} and rnr_{n} by Step 1), hence Borel from XX to XX by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Its values lie in XnX_{n} and in XaX^{a} by Step 2, so it is measurable as a map into XaX^{a} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §measurable, and ∣Λnη(x)∣a2=∥η(rn(x))∥2|\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)|_{a}^{2}=\lVert\eta(r_{n}(x))\rVert^{2} by Step 2. The function ∥η∥2\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} is nonnegative and Borel, as the composition of η\eta with the Borel function u↦∥u∥2u\mapsto\lVert u\rVert^{2} of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs (claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), so claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives

∫X∣Λnη∣a2 dμ=∫X∥η(rn(x))∥2 μ(dx)=∫Rn∥η∥2 dμ~<∞,\int_{X}|\Lambda_{n}\eta|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu=\int_{X}\lVert\eta(r_{n}(x))\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\tilde{\mu}<\infty ,

so Λnη\Lambda_{n}\eta is square-integrable with respect to μ\mu in the sense of The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §space, with E=XaE=X^{a} as in Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields.

Dependence on the class. Let η′\eta' be a Borel map with η′∼μ~η\eta'\sim_{\tilde{\mu}}\eta in the sense of Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu; it is square-integrable by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes. The set {η=η′}\{\eta=\eta'\} is Borel, as presupposed by the relation μ~({η=η′})=1\tilde{\mu}(\{\eta=\eta'\})=1 of Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, so its complement N={u:η(u)≠η′(u)}N=\{u:\eta(u)\ne\eta'(u)\} is Borel and satisfies μ~(N)=1−1=0\tilde{\mu}(N)=1-1=0 by Basic Properties of a Measure §differences. Since ak1/2≠0a_{k}^{1/2}\ne0, D+D_{+} is injective, and pn∗p_{n}^{*} is injective because pn∘pn∗p_{n}\circ p_{n}^{*} is the identity (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity); so by (0), Λnη(x)≠Λnη′(x)\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)\ne\Lambda_{n}\eta'(x) exactly when rn(x)∈Nr_{n}(x)\in N. Thus {x:Λnη(x)≠Λnη′(x)}=rn−1(N)\{x:\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)\ne\Lambda_{n}\eta'(x)\}=r_{n}^{-1}(N), whose μ\mu-measure is μ~(N)=0\tilde{\mu}(N)=0 by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward. Hence Λnη∼μΛnη′\Lambda_{n}\eta\sim_{\mu}\Lambda_{n}\eta' in the sense of Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §almost-everywhere with E=XaE=X^{a}, and the two have the same class by The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §classes. So Λn\Lambda_{n} is well defined on L2(μ~;Rn)L^{2}(\tilde{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Linearity. For square-integrable Borel ξ,η\xi,\eta and s,t∈Rs,t\in\mathbb{R}, (sξ+tη)k=sξk+tηk(s\xi+t\eta)_{k}=s\xi_{k}+t\eta_{k}, so Λn(sξ+tη)(x)=s Λnξ(x)+t Λnη(x)\Lambda_{n}(s\xi+t\eta)(x)=s\,\Lambda_{n}\xi(x)+t\,\Lambda_{n}\eta(x) for every x∈Xx\in X. Since the operations on classes are [ξ]+[η]=[ξ+η][\xi]+[\eta]=[\xi+\eta] and s[ξ]=[sξ]s[\xi]=[s\xi] on both sides (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes through Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, and The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations), Λn(sξ+tη)=sΛnξ+tΛnη\Lambda_{n}(s\xi+t\eta)=s\Lambda_{n}\xi+t\Lambda_{n}\eta in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}).

Isometry. For square-integrable Borel ξ,η\xi,\eta, the function ξ⋅η\xi\cdot\eta is Borel and integrable with respect to μ~\tilde{\mu} by Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Coordinates, Operations, Almost Sure Equality and the Mean-Square Form §operations, applied on the probability space (Rn,B(Rn),μ~)(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}),\tilde{\mu}) as in Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu. By The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations, (1), claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables in its integrable form, and Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu,

⟨Λnξ,Λnη⟩μ=∫X⟨Λnξ(x),Λnη(x)⟩a μ(dx)=∫Xξ(rn(x))⋅η(rn(x)) μ(dx)=∫Rnξ⋅η dμ~=⟨ξ,η⟩μ~.\langle\Lambda_{n}\xi,\Lambda_{n}\eta\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{X}\bigl\langle\Lambda_{n}\xi(x),\Lambda_{n}\eta(x)\bigr\rangle_{a}\,\mu(dx)=\int_{X}\xi\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\cdot\eta\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\,\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\xi\cdot\eta\,d\tilde{\mu}=\langle\xi,\eta\rangle_{\tilde{\mu}} .

Step 5 (Claim 4). Let ψ∈Cc∞(Rn)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). For l≤nl\le n write prl(u)=ul\mathrm{pr}_{l}(u)=u_{l} for the llth coordinate function on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} of claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set. Each coordinate Rl=al−1/2prlR_{l}=a_{l}^{-1/2}\mathrm{pr}_{l} of RR is smooth on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by claims 2 and 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, so RR is smooth by claim 1 of Coordinate Functions, the CkC^k Hierarchy, and Partial Derivatives of a Smooth Map, hence of class C1C^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set. For i,l≤ni,l\le n and u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the difference quotient of prl\mathrm{pr}_{l} in the iith variable at uu equals 11 if i=li=l and 00 otherwise, for every h≠0h\ne0, so every positive δ\delta serves for every positive ε\varepsilon; thus by Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set and Uniqueness of the Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set, ∂iprl(u)\partial_{i}\mathrm{pr}_{l}(u) is 11 if i=li=l and 00 otherwise, and by claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, ∂iRl(u)=al−1/2∂iprl(u)\partial_{i}R_{l}(u)=a_{l}^{-1/2}\partial_{i}\mathrm{pr}_{l}(u). The test function ψ\psi is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §gradient), which is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. By claims 1 and 2 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k (with k=1k=1), χ=ψ∘R\chi=\psi\circ R is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and, for i≤ni\le n and u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n},

∂iχ(u)=∑l=1n∂lψ(R(u)) ∂iRl(u)=ai−1/2 ∂iψ(R(u)).(2)\partial_{i}\chi(u)=\sum_{l=1}^{n}\partial_{l}\psi\bigl(R(u)\bigr)\,\partial_{i}R_{l}(u)=a_{i}^{-1/2}\,\partial_{i}\psi\bigl(R(u)\bigr).\qquad(2)

The function ψ\psi is continuous from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, and compactly supported for the topology of dEd_{E} by Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §space; so ψ\psi is bounded by claim 1 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable, and then so is χ\chi, whose values are values of ψ\psi. Each ∂iψ\partial_{i}\psi is bounded by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §gradient, so each ∂iχ\partial_{i}\chi is bounded by (2). Hence χ∈Cb1(Rn)\chi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded. Since rn=R∘pnr_{n}=R\circ p_{n}, φ=ψ∘rn=χ∘pn\varphi=\psi\circ r_{n}=\chi\circ p_{n}, so φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (n,χ)(n,\chi) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical and Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §representation. By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial and (2), ∂kφ(x)=∂kχ(pn(x))=ak−1/2∂kψ(rn(x))\partial_{k}\varphi(x)=\partial_{k}\chi(p_{n}(x))=a_{k}^{-1/2}\partial_{k}\psi(r_{n}(x)) for k≤nk\le n and x∈Xx\in X. The gradient map ∇ψ\nabla\psi is Borel by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §test, and its kk-th coordinate is ∂kψ\partial_{k}\psi by Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §gradient. Hence, by The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient with the representation (n,χ)(n,\chi),

∇aφ(x)=∑k=1nak ak−1/2 ∂kψ(rn(x)) ek=∑k=1nak1/2 (∇ψ)k(rn(x)) ek=Λn(∇ψ)(x)(x∈X).\nabla_{a}\varphi(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,a_{k}^{-1/2}\,\partial_{k}\psi\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\,e_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}\,(\nabla\psi)_{k}\bigl(r_{n}(x)\bigr)\,e_{k}=\Lambda_{n}(\nabla\psi)(x)\qquad(x\in X).

Step 6 (Claim 5). By Step 1, μ~∈P2(Rn)\tilde{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), so Gμ~G_{\tilde{\mu}} and Tμ~T_{\tilde{\mu}} are defined. For ψ∈Cc∞(Rn)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), ∇ψ\nabla\psi is Borel and square-integrable against μ~\tilde{\mu} (Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §test), and by Step 4 and Step 5 the class Λn(∇ψ)\Lambda_{n}(\nabla\psi) is the class of ∇a(ψ∘rn)\nabla_{a}(\psi\circ r_{n}) with ψ∘rn∈FCb1(X)\psi\circ r_{n}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), an element of GμaG^{a}_{\mu} by The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradients. By The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §gradients, Λn\Lambda_{n} thus maps Gμ~G_{\tilde{\mu}} into GμaG^{a}_{\mu}.

Let η∈Tμ~\eta\in T_{\tilde{\mu}}, the closure of Gμ~G_{\tilde{\mu}} in L2(μ~;Rn)L^{2}(\tilde{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{n}) (The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent), taken in the topology of the distance dμ~d_{\tilde{\mu}} (Real Hilbert Space §topology, Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu). By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space there is a sequence (ζj)j∈N(\zeta_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} in Gμ~G_{\tilde{\mu}} converging to η\eta in (L2(μ~;Rn),dμ~)(L^{2}(\tilde{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{n}),d_{\tilde{\mu}}). By Step 4 (linearity, then the isometry with both arguments equal to ζj−η\zeta_{j}-\eta), and since in both spaces the norm is that of the inner product (The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations with Real Inner Product Space §norm, and The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product),

∥Λnζj−Λnη∥μ2=⟨Λn(ζj−η),Λn(ζj−η)⟩μ=⟨ζj−η,ζj−η⟩μ~=∥ζj−η∥μ~2,\lVert\Lambda_{n}\zeta_{j}-\Lambda_{n}\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\bigl\langle\Lambda_{n}(\zeta_{j}-\eta),\Lambda_{n}(\zeta_{j}-\eta)\bigr\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\zeta_{j}-\eta,\zeta_{j}-\eta\rangle_{\tilde{\mu}}=\lVert\zeta_{j}-\eta\rVert_{\tilde{\mu}}^{2},

so the distance of L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) (Real Inner Product Space §distance) from Λnζj\Lambda_{n}\zeta_{j} to Λnη\Lambda_{n}\eta equals dμ~(ζj,η)d_{\tilde{\mu}}(\zeta_{j},\eta) for every jj. By Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space, (Λnζj)j∈N(\Lambda_{n}\zeta_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges to Λnη\Lambda_{n}\eta in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}), and each Λnζj\Lambda_{n}\zeta_{j} lies in GμaG^{a}_{\mu}. By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space again, Λnη\Lambda_{n}\eta lies in the closure of GμaG^{a}_{\mu} in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) in the sense of Real Hilbert Space §topology, which is TμaT^{a}_{\mu} by The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §tangent.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…