TheoremBase

The weights 2^{-k(q+8)} beat the derivative bounds 2^{k(q+m)} of the Gaussians at scale 2 4^{-k} by a geometric factor, so term-by-term differentiation applies three times; the potential is handled by differentiation under the integral, and the pairing identities by monotone convergence and the Gaussian pairing identity.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Let A0,…,A3A_{0},\dots,A_{3} be the constants of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails (iii), and let the notation s−m/2s^{-m/2} be as in The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails.

Step 0 (the weights beat the bounds). For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} one has 4k=(2⋅2)k=2k2k4^{k}=(2\cdot2)^{k}=2^{k}2^{k} by claim 3 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, so (2−k)2=4−k=sk(2^{-k})^{2}=4^{-k}=s_{k} and sk=2−k\sqrt{s_{k}}=2^{-k} by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, and 2sk=2 sk=2 2−k\sqrt{2s_{k}}=\sqrt{2}\,\sqrt{s_{k}}=\sqrt{2}\,2^{-k} by claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities. Hence, for a natural number mm, (2sk)−m/2(2s_{k})^{-m/2}, the inverse of (2 2−k)m=(2)m2−km(\sqrt{2}\,2^{-k})^{m}=(\sqrt{2})^{m}2^{-km} (claim 3 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field and claim 1 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities), equals (2)−m2km(\sqrt{2})^{-m}2^{km}, and

wk (2sk)−(q+m)/2=(2)−(q+m) 2−k(q+8) 2k(q+m)=(2)−(q+m) (2−(8−m))k(m≤3),w_{k}\,(2s_{k})^{-(q+m)/2}=(\sqrt{2})^{-(q+m)}\,2^{-k(q+8)}\,2^{k(q+m)}=(\sqrt{2})^{-(q+m)}\,\bigl(2^{-(8-m)}\bigr)^{k}\qquad(m\le3),

by the algebra of powers in claim 1 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities. For m∈{0,1,2,3}m\in\{0,1,2,3\} put ak(m)=Am(2)−(q+m)(2−(8−m))ka^{(m)}_{k}=A_{m}(\sqrt{2})^{-(q+m)}(2^{-(8-m)})^{k}. Since 0<2−(8−m)<10<2^{-(8-m)}<1, the series ∑kak(m)\sum_{k}a^{(m)}_{k} converges by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series (iv) together with the homogeneity of Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers (i); let Mm=∑k=1∞ak(m)M_{m}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a^{(m)}_{k}, a nonnegative real number depending only on qq. By The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails (iii) applied with s=2sk≤1s=2s_{k}\le1, for all zz and i,j,l∈[q]i,j,l\in[q],

wk g2sk(z)≤ak(0),∣wk ∂ig2sk(z)∣≤ak(1),∣wk ∂j∂ig2sk(z)∣≤ak(2),∣wk ∂l∂j∂ig2sk(z)∣≤ak(3).w_{k}\,g_{2s_{k}}(z)\le a^{(0)}_{k},\qquad|w_{k}\,\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}(z)|\le a^{(1)}_{k},\qquad|w_{k}\,\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}(z)|\le a^{(2)}_{k},\qquad|w_{k}\,\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}(z)|\le a^{(3)}_{k}.

Claim 1. Each g2skg_{2s_{k}} is smooth (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails (ii)), hence of class C1C^{1}, and so is wkg2skw_{k}g_{2s_{k}} with ∂i(wkg2sk)=wk∂ig2sk\partial_{i}(w_{k}g_{2s_{k}})=w_{k}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}} (claims 1 and 3 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions); likewise wk∂ig2skw_{k}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}} and wk∂j∂ig2skw_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}} are of class C1C^{1} with partial derivatives wk∂j∂ig2skw_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}} and wk∂l∂j∂ig2skw_{k}\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}. Apply Term-by-Term Differentiation of a Series of Continuously Differentiable Functions with Summable Uniform Bounds three times: to fk=wkg2skf_{k}=w_{k}g_{2s_{k}} with the bounds ak(0),ak(1)a^{(0)}_{k},a^{(1)}_{k}; to fk=wk∂ig2skf_{k}=w_{k}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}} with ak(1),ak(2)a^{(1)}_{k},a^{(2)}_{k}; and to fk=wk∂j∂ig2skf_{k}=w_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}} with ak(2),ak(3)a^{(2)}_{k},a^{(3)}_{k}. By Term-by-Term Differentiation of a Series of Continuously Differentiable Functions with Summable Uniform Bounds (i) all the series in the statement converge absolutely, and by Term-by-Term Differentiation of a Series of Continuously Differentiable Functions with Summable Uniform Bounds (ii): KK is of class C1C^{1} with ∂iK=∑kwk∂ig2sk\partial_{i}K=\sum_{k}w_{k}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}; this function is of class C1C^{1} with ∂j∂iK=∑kwk∂j∂ig2sk\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K=\sum_{k}w_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}; and this is of class C1C^{1} with ∂l∂j∂iK=∑kwk∂l∂j∂ig2sk\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K=\sum_{k}w_{k}\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{2s_{k}}; together with the bounds ∣K∣≤M0|K|\le M_{0}, ∣∂iK∣≤M1|\partial_{i}K|\le M_{1}, ∣∂j∂iK∣≤M2|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K|\le M_{2}, ∣∂l∂j∂iK∣≤M3|\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K|\le M_{3}. By clause 2 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ, applied twice, KK is of class C3C^{3}. Its terms being nonnegative, K(z)≥0K(z)\ge0 by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series (i); and K(−z)=K(z)K(-z)=K(z) because the two series ∑kwkg2sk(−z)\sum_{k}w_{k}g_{2s_{k}}(-z) and ∑kwkg2sk(z)\sum_{k}w_{k}g_{2s_{k}}(z) have the same terms, by the evenness in The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails (ii).

Claim 2. Let ν∈P(Rq)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{q}), and let M=max⁡{M0,M1,M2,M3}M=\max\{M_{0},M_{1},M_{2},M_{3}\}. By claim 1, KK, ∂iK\partial_{i}K and ∂j∂iK\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K are of class C1C^{1} and bounded, together with their partial derivatives, by MM. By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (i) the function y↦K(x−y)y\mapsto K(x-y) is Borel and bounded for each xx, so K∗νK*\nu is defined, and by The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (ii) applied to G=KG=K, then to G=∂iKG=\partial_{i}K, then to G=∂j∂iKG=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K, the function K∗νK*\nu is of class C1C^{1} with ∂i(K∗ν)=(∂iK)∗ν\partial_{i}(K*\nu)=(\partial_{i}K)*\nu, this is of class C1C^{1} with ∂j∂i(K∗ν)=(∂j∂iK)∗ν\partial_{j}\partial_{i}(K*\nu)=(\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K)*\nu, and this is of class C1C^{1} with ∂l∂j∂i(K∗ν)=(∂l∂j∂iK)∗ν\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}(K*\nu)=(\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K)*\nu, which are the displayed formulas; K∗νK*\nu is of class C3C^{3} by clause 2 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ. The bounds by M0,…,M3M_{0},\dots,M_{3} follow from The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (i) applied with C=MmC=M_{m} to the respective derivative of KK, and K∗ν≥0K*\nu\ge0 since its integrand is nonnegative (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion). For the series representation fix xx and let Fm(y)=∑k=1mwkg2sk(x−y)F_{m}(y)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}w_{k}g_{2s_{k}}(x-y), the mmth partial sum of the series defining K(x−y)K(x-y). Each FmF_{m} is a nonnegative Borel function of yy (The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (i) for each term, claim 2 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps), the sequence (Fm(y))m(F_{m}(y))_{m} is nondecreasing with limit K(x−y)K(x-y) (Series of Real Numbers (ii)), and ∫Fm dν=∑k=1mwk(g2sk∗ν)(x)\int F_{m}\,d\nu=\sum_{k=1}^{m}w_{k}(g_{2s_{k}}*\nu)(x) by the additivity and homogeneity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, applied inductively over the summands (Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums). By Monotone Convergence Theorem, ∫K(x−y) ν(dy)\int K(x-y)\,\nu(dy) is the supremum of these partial sums; the partial sums being nondecreasing and bounded by this finite supremum, they converge to it by A Bounded Monotone Sequence of Real Numbers Converges, which is the statement that ∑kwk(g2sk∗ν)(x)\sum_{k}w_{k}(g_{2s_{k}}*\nu)(x) converges, absolutely since its terms are nonnegative, with sum (K∗ν)(x)(K*\nu)(x).

Claim 3. The map z↦pr1(z)−pr2(z)z\mapsto\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z) on Rq+q\mathbb{R}^{q+q} is Borel (its components are differences of the Borel components of the projections, Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i) and claim 2 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps), KK is continuous (clause 1 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ) hence Borel (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii)), so z↦K(pr1(z)−pr2(z))z\mapsto K(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)) is Borel (claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), with values in [0,M0][0,M_{0}]; hence K(μ,ν)\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu) is a real number with 0≤K(μ,ν)≤M00\le\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu)\le M_{0} by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii) and Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems (Tonelli; μ\mu and ν\nu are finite, the integrand nonnegative and measurable for the product σ\sigma-algebra as the composition with ι\iota of a Borel function),

K(μ,ν)=∫Rq(∫RqK(x−y) ν(dy))μ(dx)=∫RqK∗ν dμ=∫Rq(∫RqK(x−y) μ(dx))ν(dy),\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}K(x-y)\,\nu(dy)\Bigr)\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}K*\nu\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}K(x-y)\,\mu(dx)\Bigr)\nu(dy),

and the last expression equals ∫(∫K(y−x) μ(dx))ν(dy)\int\bigl(\int K(y-x)\,\mu(dx)\bigr)\nu(dy) by the evenness of KK, which is the corresponding iterated integral for K(ν,μ)\mathcal{K}(\nu,\mu); hence K(μ,ν)=K(ν,μ)\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu)=\mathcal{K}(\nu,\mu). For the series, let x∈Rqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and let Fm(x)=∑k=1mwk(g2sk∗ν)(x)F_{m}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}w_{k}(g_{2s_{k}}*\nu)(x); these are nonnegative Borel functions of xx (The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (i)), nondecreasing in mm, with limit (K∗ν)(x)(K*\nu)(x) by claim 2. As in claim 2, Monotone Convergence Theorem and A Bounded Monotone Sequence of Real Numbers Converges give that ∑kwk∫g2sk∗ν dμ\sum_{k}w_{k}\int g_{2s_{k}}*\nu\,d\mu converges, with nonnegative terms, to ∫K∗ν dμ=K(μ,ν)\int K*\nu\,d\mu=\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu). Finally, for each kk, Tonelli as above gives ∫g2sk∗ν dμ=∫Rq+qg2sk(pr1(z)−pr2(z)) (μ⊠ν)(dz)\int g_{2s_{k}}*\nu\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q+q}}g_{2s_{k}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))\,(\mu\boxtimes\nu)(dz), which equals ∫Rq(gsk∗μ)(gsk∗ν) dλq\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}(g_{s_{k}}*\mu)(g_{s_{k}}*\nu)\,d\lambda_{q} by Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity (v), applicable since 0<sk≤120<s_{k}\le\tfrac12; that clause also gives the integrability of each product.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…