TheoremBase

Proof of Basic Properties of Twice Differentiability at a Point

lemmalem:twice-differentiable-basic-rn-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Β· 5,607 chars Β· 18 deps Β· depth 18 Reason: First publication of the proof: the quadratic term is negligible at first order, the class C^2 case is the Peano Taylor expansion rewritten with the Hessian matrix, and the local maximum conditions follow along rays.

The quadratic term is O(βˆ₯hβˆ₯2)O(\lVert h\rVert^2), hence negligible at first order, which identifies the first-order coefficient with the gradient; the class C2C^2 case is the Peano-remainder Taylor expansion rewritten with the Hessian matrix; and the local maximum conditions follow by testing along rays and dividing by tt and then by t2t^2.

Proof

We use the notation of the statement. Algebraic manipulations of dot products use Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and βˆ₯vβˆ₯2=vβ‹…v\lVert v\rVert^{2}=v\cdot v is claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Claim 1. By claim 3 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product there is C∈RC\in\mathbb{R} with 0≀C0\le C and βˆ₯Bvβˆ₯≀Cβˆ₯vβˆ₯\lVert Bv\rVert\le C\lVert v\rVert for every vv; put K=1+12CK=1+\tfrac{1}{2}C, a positive real number. Applying Twice Differentiability at a Point Β§twice-differentiable with the value 11 in place of Ξ΅\varepsilon gives Ξ΄1>0\delta_{1}>0 such that every hh with βˆ₯hβˆ₯<Ξ΄1\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{1} satisfies y+h∈Uy+h\in U and

∣f(y+h)βˆ’f(y)βˆ’pβ‹…hβˆ£β‰€βˆ₯hβˆ₯2+12∣hβ‹…(Bh)βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯hβˆ₯2+12Cβˆ₯hβˆ₯2=Kβˆ₯hβˆ₯2,\bigl|f(y+h)-f(y)-p\cdot h\bigr|\le\lVert h\rVert^{2}+\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl|h\cdot(Bh)\bigr|\le\lVert h\rVert^{2}+\tfrac{1}{2}C\lVert h\rVert^{2}=K\lVert h\rVert^{2},

using claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product.

Let Ρ∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<Ξ΅0<\varepsilon and let Ξ΄\delta be the smaller of Ξ΄1\delta_{1} and Ξ΅/K\varepsilon/K. If 0<βˆ₯hβˆ₯<Ξ΄0<\lVert h\rVert<\delta then y+h∈Uy+h\in U and

∣f(y+h)βˆ’f(y)βˆ’pβ‹…hβˆ£β‰€Kβˆ₯hβˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯hβˆ₯≀Ρβˆ₯hβˆ₯.\bigl|f(y+h)-f(y)-p\cdot h\bigr|\le K\lVert h\rVert\cdot\lVert h\rVert\le\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert .

Let AA be the real matrix with one row and nn columns given by A1i=piA_{1i}=p_{i}. By Matrix-Vector Product the single coordinate of AhAh is βˆ‘i=1npihi=pβ‹…h\sum_{i=1}^{n}p_{i}h_{i}=p\cdot h, and by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the Euclidean norm of a point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is the absolute value of its coordinate, both being the unique nonnegative real number whose square is the square of that coordinate. So the display reads βˆ₯f(y+h)βˆ’f(y)βˆ’Ahβˆ₯≀Ρβˆ₯hβˆ₯\lVert f(y+h)-f(y)-Ah\rVert\le\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert, and Differentiability at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces is satisfied: ff is differentiable at yy with derivative matrix AA. By claim 1 of A Derivative Matrix is the Jacobian Matrix, and is Unique the partial derivatives of ff exist at yy with βˆ‚if(y)=A1i=pi\partial_{i}f(y)=A_{1i}=p_{i}, so p=Df(y)p=Df(y) by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set.

Claim 2. Let y∈Uy\in U and let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0. By Second-Order Taylor Expansion with Peano Remainder there is Ξ΄>0\delta>0 such that every hh with βˆ₯hβˆ₯<Ξ΄\lVert h\rVert<\delta satisfies y+h∈Uy+h\in U and

∣f(y+h)βˆ’f(y)βˆ’βˆ‘i=1nβˆ‚if(y)hiβˆ’12βˆ‘i=1nβˆ‘j=1nβˆ‚jβˆ‚if(y)hihjβˆ£β‰€Ξ΅βˆ₯hβˆ₯2.\Bigl|f(y+h)-f(y)-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_{i}f(y)h_{i}-\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f(y)h_{i}h_{j}\Bigr|\le\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

Now βˆ‘iβˆ‚if(y)hi=Df(y)β‹…h\sum_{i}\partial_{i}f(y)h_{i}=Df(y)\cdot h by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set and Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Writing D2f(y)D^{2}f(y) for the Hessian matrix, whose entry in row ii and column jj is βˆ‚iβˆ‚jf(y)\partial_{i}\partial_{j}f(y), claim 4 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum gives

hβ‹…(D2f(y)h)=βˆ‘i=1nβˆ‘j=1nβˆ‚iβˆ‚jf(y) hihj,h\cdot\bigl(D^{2}f(y)h\bigr)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_{i}\partial_{j}f(y)\,h_{i}h_{j},

which equals βˆ‘iβˆ‘jβˆ‚jβˆ‚if(y)hihj\sum_{i}\sum_{j}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f(y)h_{i}h_{j} by claim 1 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian. Since D2f(y)∈S(n)D^{2}f(y)\in\mathcal{S}(n) by claim 2 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian, the display is exactly the condition of Twice Differentiability at a Point Β§twice-differentiable with first-order coefficient Df(y)Df(y) and Hessian D2f(y)D^{2}f(y). By the uniqueness recorded in Twice Differentiability at a Point Β§hessian, the Hessian in the sense of that definition is the Hessian matrix, so the two uses of the notation agree.

Claim 3. By Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space, applied in the metric space (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) with the subset UU, there is Ξ΄0>0\delta_{0}>0 such that every z∈Uz\in U with dE(y,z)<Ξ΄0d_{E}(y,z)<\delta_{0} satisfies f(z)≀f(y)f(z)\le f(y).

Let u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with βˆ₯uβˆ₯=1\lVert u\rVert=1, let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, and let Ξ΄\delta be as in Twice Differentiability at a Point Β§twice-differentiable for this Ξ΅\varepsilon. Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with 0<t0<t and t<Ξ΄t<\delta and t<Ξ΄0t<\delta_{0}, and put h=tuh=tu, so βˆ₯hβˆ₯=t\lVert h\rVert=t and dE(y,y+h)=βˆ₯hβˆ₯=t<Ξ΄0d_{E}(y,y+h)=\lVert h\rVert=t<\delta_{0}; thus y+h∈Uy+h\in U and f(y+h)βˆ’f(y)≀0f(y+h)-f(y)\le0. Expanding by bilinearity, pβ‹…h=t pβ‹…up\cdot h=t\,p\cdot u and hβ‹…(Bh)=t2 uβ‹…(Bu)h\cdot(Bh)=t^{2}\,u\cdot(Bu), so

t pβ‹…u+12t2 uβ‹…(Bu)≀(f(y+h)βˆ’f(y))+Ξ΅t2≀Ρt2,t\,p\cdot u+\tfrac{1}{2}t^{2}\,u\cdot(Bu)\le\bigl(f(y+h)-f(y)\bigr)+\varepsilon t^{2}\le\varepsilon t^{2},

using claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Dividing by the positive number tt,

pβ‹…u≀t(Ξ΅βˆ’12uβ‹…(Bu)).p\cdot u\le t\Bigl(\varepsilon-\tfrac{1}{2}u\cdot(Bu)\Bigr).

The bracket does not depend on tt, so by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers the right-hand side is smaller than any prescribed positive real for tt small enough; hence pβ‹…u≀0p\cdot u\le0. Applying this with βˆ’u-u, which also has norm 11 by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, gives βˆ’pβ‹…u≀0-p\cdot u\le0, so pβ‹…u=0p\cdot u=0. If pβ‰ 0p\neq0, taking u=p/βˆ₯pβˆ₯u=p/\lVert p\rVert gives 0=pβ‹…u=βˆ₯pβˆ₯>00=p\cdot u=\lVert p\rVert>0, a contradiction; hence p=0p=0.

With p=0p=0 the displayed inequality becomes 12t2uβ‹…(Bu)≀Ρt2\tfrac{1}{2}t^{2}u\cdot(Bu)\le\varepsilon t^{2}, so dividing by the positive number t2t^{2} gives uβ‹…(Bu)≀2Ξ΅u\cdot(Bu)\le2\varepsilon. As Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, uβ‹…(Bu)≀0u\cdot(Bu)\le0 for every uu with βˆ₯uβˆ₯=1\lVert u\rVert=1. For general zβ‰ 0z\neq0, writing z=βˆ₯zβˆ₯uz=\lVert z\rVert u with u=z/βˆ₯zβˆ₯u=z/\lVert z\rVert of norm 11 gives zβ‹…(Bz)=βˆ₯zβˆ₯2uβ‹…(Bu)≀0z\cdot(Bz)=\lVert z\rVert^{2}u\cdot(Bu)\le0, and for z=0z=0 both sides vanish. Since every entry of 0n0_{n} is 00, Matrix-Vector Product gives 0nz=00_{n}z=0 and hence zβ‹…(0nz)=0z\cdot(0_{n}z)=0; therefore zβ‹…(Bz)≀zβ‹…(0nz)z\cdot(Bz)\le z\cdot(0_{n}z) for every z∈Rnz\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, which is Bβͺ―0nB\preceq0_{n} by The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…