TheoremBase

Push-forward and change-of-variables computations give the marginals and costs, and Minkowski-type bounds come from the triangle inequality of the mean-square norm on a coupling regarded as a probability space. Quantisation projects onto the first n coordinates, where the second-moment tail is small by dominated convergence, and applies Euclidean quantisation there; gluing over a finitely supported middle measure uses an explicit density against the product of the two couplings with Tonelli's theorem.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied with the data named at the point of citation. "The integral theorem" refers to Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral (claim 1: additivity, homogeneity with a factor in [0,∞)[0,\infty) and monotonicity of the nonnegative integral, additivity extending to finite sums by induction on the number of terms; claim 2: linearity, the bound ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣|\int f|\le\int|f| and monotonicity for integrable functions). "Change of variables" refers to claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, in force for push-forwards by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward, and "the density formula" to claim 3 of the same lemma. Throughout, π1,π2:X×X→X\pi_{1},\pi_{2}:X\times X\to X are Borel and B(X×X)=B(X)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X)=\mathcal{B}(X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(X), by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma; composites of measurable maps are measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Four standing facts are used repeatedly.

(a) Norm facts. For x,y∈Xx,y\in X one has ∣x−y∣=d(x,y)=d(y,x)=∣y−x∣|x-y|=d(x,y)=d(y,x)=|y-x|, by Real Inner Product Space §distance and the symmetry of the metric dd (The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §metric); and ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣|x+y|\le|x|+|y| and ∣x−y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣|x-y|\le|x|+|y| by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle. For real r,s,t≥0r,s,t\ge0 with r≤s+tr\le s+t one has r2≤(s+t)2r^{2}\le(s+t)^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, and (s+t)2≤2s2+2t2(s+t)^{2}\le2s^{2}+2t^{2} since 2s2+2t2−(s+t)2=(s−t)2≥02s^{2}+2t^{2}-(s+t)^{2}=(s-t)^{2}\ge0.

(b) Borel functions. The map x↦∣x∣x\mapsto|x| on XX is Lipschitz with constant 11 by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §lipschitz, hence continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; the map x↦∣x∣2x\mapsto|x|^{2} is Borel as recorded in The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment. Let φ0:X×X→R\varphi_{0}:X\times X\to\mathbb{R} be φ0(z)=∣π1(z)−π2(z)∣\varphi_{0}(z)=|\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z)| and φ=φ02\varphi=\varphi_{0}^{2}. The map z↦π1(z)−π2(z)z\mapsto\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z) is Lipschitz with constant 22, as recorded in Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost, so its composite φ0\varphi_{0} with the norm is Lipschitz with constant 22, hence continuous and Borel by the same three references; φ\varphi is Borel by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and I(π)=∫φ dπI(\pi)=\int\varphi\,d\pi for every coupling π\pi by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost.

(c) Pairings and push-forwards. For maps S,TS,T from a set Ω\Omega into XX, π1∘(S,T)=S\pi_{1}\circ(S,T)=S and π2∘(S,T)=T\pi_{2}\circ(S,T)=T by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pairs and The Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §notation; hence φ((S,T)(ω))=∣S(ω)−T(ω)∣2\varphi((S,T)(\omega))=|S(\omega)-T(\omega)|^{2} and φ0((S,T)(ω))=∣S(ω)−T(ω)∣\varphi_{0}((S,T)(\omega))=|S(\omega)-T(\omega)|. For measurable maps GG from a measure space (Ω1,F1,τ)(\Omega_{1},\mathcal{F}_{1},\tau) into a measurable space (Ω2,F2)(\Omega_{2},\mathcal{F}_{2}) and HH from (Ω2,F2)(\Omega_{2},\mathcal{F}_{2}) into a measurable space (Ω3,F3)(\Omega_{3},\mathcal{F}_{3}), the image measures of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables satisfy (H∘G)#τ=H#(G#τ)(H\circ G)_{\#}\tau=H_{\#}(G_{\#}\tau), both assigning to B∈F3B\in\mathcal{F}_{3} the value τ(G−1(H−1(B)))\tau(G^{-1}(H^{-1}(B))); and G#τG_{\#}\tau has total mass τ(Ω1)\tau(\Omega_{1}) by the same claim, so push-forwards of members of P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) or P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X) by Borel maps into XX or X×XX\times X lie in P(X)\mathcal{P}(X), respectively P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X).

(d) Integrals and mean squares. On a measure space, a nonnegative measurable real function with finite integral is integrable with the same integral, its negative part being 00 and its positive part itself; this identifies the two readings of such integrals below. On a probability space, square-integrable random variables and the norm ∥⋅∥2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{2} are those of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product; a measurable real function ff with ∫f2<∞\int f^{2}<\infty is square-integrable with ∥f∥2=∫f2\lVert f\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{\int f^{2}}, the expectation of the nonnegative random variable f2f^{2} being its integral by Expectation, Variance, and Moments; and sums of square-integrable random variables are square-integrable by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product.

Claim 1. Members of P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) have finite total mass. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-measure, μ⊗ν\mu\otimes\nu is a Borel measure on X×XX\times X with (π1)#(μ⊗ν)=ν(X) μ=μ(\pi_{1})_{\#}(\mu\otimes\nu)=\nu(X)\,\mu=\mu and (π2)#(μ⊗ν)=μ(X) ν=ν(\pi_{2})_{\#}(\mu\otimes\nu)=\mu(X)\,\nu=\nu. Its total mass is (μ⊗ν)(X×X)=μ(X) ν(X)=1(\mu\otimes\nu)(X\times X)=\mu(X)\,\nu(X)=1 by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, X×XX\times X being a measurable rectangle. Hence μ⊗ν∈P(X×X)\mu\otimes\nu\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X), and μ⊗ν∈Π(μ,ν)\mu\otimes\nu\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling.

Claim 2. The swap σ=(π2,π1)\sigma=(\pi_{2},\pi_{1}) is Borel, as recorded in the statement, so σ#π∈P(X×X)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X) by (c). By (c), π1∘σ=π2\pi_{1}\circ\sigma=\pi_{2} and π2∘σ=π1\pi_{2}\circ\sigma=\pi_{1}, and σ(σ(z))=(π2(σ(z)),π1(σ(z)))=(π1(z),π2(z))=z\sigma(\sigma(z))=(\pi_{2}(\sigma(z)),\pi_{1}(\sigma(z)))=(\pi_{1}(z),\pi_{2}(z))=z, a pair being determined by its coordinates (The Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §notation). Hence by (c), (π1)#(σ#π)=(π1∘σ)#π=(π2)#π=ν(\pi_{1})_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=(\pi_{1}\circ\sigma)_{\#}\pi=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi=\nu and (π2)#(σ#π)=(π1)#π=μ(\pi_{2})_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu, so σ#π∈Π(ν,μ)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling; and σ#(σ#π)=(σ∘σ)#π=π\sigma_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=(\sigma\circ\sigma)_{\#}\pi=\pi. By change of variables, I(σ#π)=∫φ∘σ dπI(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=\int\varphi\circ\sigma\,d\pi, and φ(σ(z))=∣π2(z)−π1(z)∣2=φ(z)\varphi(\sigma(z))=|\pi_{2}(z)-\pi_{1}(z)|^{2}=\varphi(z) by (c) and (a); so I(σ#π)=I(π)I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=I(\pi).

Claim 3. Let π∈Π(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu). For every z∈X×Xz\in X\times X, (a) gives φ0(z)≤∣π1(z)∣+∣π2(z)∣\varphi_{0}(z)\le|\pi_{1}(z)|+|\pi_{2}(z)| and hence φ(z)≤2∣π1(z)∣2+2∣π2(z)∣2\varphi(z)\le2|\pi_{1}(z)|^{2}+2|\pi_{2}(z)|^{2}. The functions z↦∣πi(z)∣2z\mapsto|\pi_{i}(z)|^{2} are Borel by (b), and by change of variables ∫∣π1(z)∣2 π(dz)=∫∣x∣2 ((π1)#π)(dx)=M2(μ)\int|\pi_{1}(z)|^{2}\,\pi(dz)=\int|x|^{2}\,((\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi)(dx)=M_{2}(\mu) and likewise ∫∣π2(z)∣2 π(dz)=M2(ν)\int|\pi_{2}(z)|^{2}\,\pi(dz)=M_{2}(\nu), by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment. Claim 1 of the integral theorem gives I(π)≤2M2(μ)+2M2(ν)I(\pi)\le2M_{2}(\mu)+2M_{2}(\nu) in [0,∞][0,\infty], which is finite when μ,ν∈P2(X)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space. Conversely, π2(z)=π1(z)−(π1(z)−π2(z))\pi_{2}(z)=\pi_{1}(z)-(\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z)) by the axioms of the vector space XX, so (a) gives ∣π2(z)∣≤∣π1(z)∣+φ0(z)|\pi_{2}(z)|\le|\pi_{1}(z)|+\varphi_{0}(z) and ∣π2(z)∣2≤2∣π1(z)∣2+2φ(z)|\pi_{2}(z)|^{2}\le2|\pi_{1}(z)|^{2}+2\varphi(z); integrating as before, M2(ν)≤2M2(μ)+2I(π)M_{2}(\nu)\le2M_{2}(\mu)+2I(\pi), which is finite when μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and I(π)<∞I(\pi)<\infty, so then ν∈P2(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X).

Claim 4. The pairing (S,T)(S,T) is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, so (S,T)#μ∈P(X×X)(S,T)_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X) by (c), and by (c) its push-forward by π1\pi_{1} is (π1∘(S,T))#μ=S#μ(\pi_{1}\circ(S,T))_{\#}\mu=S_{\#}\mu and by π2\pi_{2} is T#μT_{\#}\mu; so (S,T)#μ∈Π(S#μ,T#μ)(S,T)_{\#}\mu\in\Pi(S_{\#}\mu,T_{\#}\mu) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling. By change of variables and (c), I((S,T)#μ)=∫φ∘(S,T) dμ=∫∣S(x)−T(x)∣2 μ(dx)I((S,T)_{\#}\mu)=\int\varphi\circ(S,T)\,d\mu=\int|S(x)-T(x)|^{2}\,\mu(dx). For S=T=idXS=T=\mathrm{id}_{X} one has (idX)#μ=μ(\mathrm{id}_{X})_{\#}\mu=\mu, and the integrand is ∣x−x∣2=d(x,x)2=0|x-x|^{2}=d(x,x)^{2}=0 by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §metric; the integral of the zero function is 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral with the null set ∅\varnothing.

Claim 5. The maps T∘π2T\circ\pi_{2} and S∘π1S\circ\pi_{1} are Borel, so the pairings (π1,T∘π2)(\pi_{1},T\circ\pi_{2}) and (S∘π1,π2)(S\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{2}) are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing and π′,π′′∈P(X×X)\pi',\pi''\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X) by (c). By (c), the push-forward of π′\pi' by π1\pi_{1} is (π1)#π=μ(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu and by π2\pi_{2} is (T∘π2)#π=T#((π2)#π)=T#ν(T\circ\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi=T_{\#}((\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi)=T_{\#}\nu; so π′∈Π(μ,T#ν)\pi'\in\Pi(\mu,T_{\#}\nu), and likewise π′′∈Π(S#μ,ν)\pi''\in\Pi(S_{\#}\mu,\nu), by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling.

Now assume I(π)<∞I(\pi)<\infty and ∫∣T(y)−y∣2 ν(dy)<∞\int|T(y)-y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)<\infty. Regard (X×X,B(X×X),π)(X\times X,\mathcal{B}(X\times X),\pi) as a probability space. Let f=φ0f=\varphi_{0} and g=φ0∘(π2,T∘π2)g=\varphi_{0}\circ(\pi_{2},T\circ\pi_{2}), Borel by (b) and Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, so that g(z)=∣π2(z)−T(π2(z))∣g(z)=|\pi_{2}(z)-T(\pi_{2}(z))| by (c). Then ∫f2 dπ=I(π)<∞\int f^{2}\,d\pi=I(\pi)<\infty, and by change of variables through π2\pi_{2}, applied to the Borel function y↦∣y−T(y)∣2y\mapsto|y-T(y)|^{2} (Borel as recorded in the statement), and by (a), ∫g2 dπ=∫∣y−T(y)∣2 ν(dy)=∫∣T(y)−y∣2 ν(dy)<∞\int g^{2}\,d\pi=\int|y-T(y)|^{2}\,\nu(dy)=\int|T(y)-y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)<\infty. By (d), ff and gg are square-integrable with ∥f∥2=I(π)\lVert f\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)} and ∥g∥2=∫∣T(y)−y∣2 ν(dy)\lVert g\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{\int|T(y)-y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)}, and f+gf+g is square-integrable. For every zz, writing x=π1(z)x=\pi_{1}(z) and y=π2(z)y=\pi_{2}(z), the vector-space axioms (Vector Space over a Field) give x−T(y)=(x−y)+(y−T(y))x-T(y)=(x-y)+(y-T(y)), so by (a), ∣x−T(y)∣≤f(z)+g(z)|x-T(y)|\le f(z)+g(z) and ∣x−T(y)∣2≤(f(z)+g(z))2|x-T(y)|^{2}\le(f(z)+g(z))^{2}. By change of variables, (c) and monotonicity in claim 1 of the integral theorem,

I(π′)=∫φ∘(π1,T∘π2) dπ=∫∣π1(z)−T(π2(z))∣2 π(dz)≤∫(f+g)2 dπ=∥f+g∥22,I(\pi')=\int\varphi\circ(\pi_{1},T\circ\pi_{2})\,d\pi=\int|\pi_{1}(z)-T(\pi_{2}(z))|^{2}\,\pi(dz)\le\int(f+g)^{2}\,d\pi=\lVert f+g\rVert_{2}^{2},

and ∥f+g∥2≤∥f∥2+∥g∥2\lVert f+g\rVert_{2}\le\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert g\rVert_{2} by claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm. Hence I(π′)<∞I(\pi')<\infty, and I(π′)≤∥f+g∥2≤∥f∥2+∥g∥2\sqrt{I(\pi')}\le\lVert f+g\rVert_{2}\le\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert g\rVert_{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, which is the asserted bound.

For π′′\pi'', assume I(π)<∞I(\pi)<\infty and ∫∣S(x)−x∣2 μ(dx)<∞\int|S(x)-x|^{2}\,\mu(dx)<\infty, and run the same argument with f=φ0f=\varphi_{0} and g′′=φ0∘(S∘π1,π1)g''=\varphi_{0}\circ(S\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{1}), so that g′′(z)=∣S(π1(z))−π1(z)∣g''(z)=|S(\pi_{1}(z))-\pi_{1}(z)| by (c): change of variables through π1\pi_{1} gives ∫g′′2 dπ=∫∣S(x)−x∣2 μ(dx)<∞\int g''^{2}\,d\pi=\int|S(x)-x|^{2}\,\mu(dx)<\infty; for every zz, with x=π1(z)x=\pi_{1}(z) and y=π2(z)y=\pi_{2}(z), one has S(x)−y=(S(x)−x)+(x−y)S(x)-y=(S(x)-x)+(x-y), so ∣S(x)−y∣2≤(g′′(z)+f(z))2|S(x)-y|^{2}\le(g''(z)+f(z))^{2} by (a); and I(π′′)=∫∣S(π1(z))−π2(z)∣2 π(dz)≤∥g′′+f∥22≤(∥f∥2+∥g′′∥2)2I(\pi'')=\int|S(\pi_{1}(z))-\pi_{2}(z)|^{2}\,\pi(dz)\le\lVert g''+f\rVert_{2}^{2}\le(\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert g''\rVert_{2})^{2} exactly as above, whence I(π′′)<∞I(\pi'')<\infty and I(π′′)≤I(π)+∫∣S(x)−x∣2 μ(dx)\sqrt{I(\pi'')}\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}+\sqrt{\int|S(x)-x|^{2}\,\mu(dx)}.

Claim 6. Let T:X→XT:X\to X be Borel with finite image. Then T(X)T(X) is Borel, as recorded in the statement for finite subsets of XX, and T−1(X∖T(X))=∅T^{-1}(X\setminus T(X))=\varnothing, so T#ν(X∖T(X))=ν(∅)=0T_{\#}\nu(X\setminus T(X))=\nu(\varnothing)=0 by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure.

Now let ν∈P2(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and 0<ε0<\varepsilon, and put η=ε2/4\eta=\varepsilon^{2}/4, a positive real number. The choices are made in the order: first nn (Step 1), then TET_{E} (Step 3), then TT (Step 4).

Step 1 (choice of nn). For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} let tm(y)=∣Qmy∣2t_{m}(y)=|Q_{m}y|^{2}; tmt_{m} is Borel, as the composite of QmQ_{m}, Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, with the Borel map x↦∣x∣2x\mapsto|x|^{2} of (b). By the identity ∣y∣2=∣Pmy∣2+∣Qmy∣2|y|^{2}=|P_{m}y|^{2}+|Q_{m}y|^{2} of Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, 0≤tm(y)≤∣y∣20\le t_{m}(y)\le|y|^{2} for every yy. By Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, PmP_{m} is the orthogonal projection onto XmX_{m}, the sequence (Xm)m∈N(X_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is exhausting and Qmy=y−PmyQ_{m}y=y-P_{m}y, so Exhausting Sequences of Finite-Dimensional Subspaces in a Separable Real Hilbert Space, and Their Projections §tail shows that (Qmy)m(Q_{m}y)_{m} converges to 0X0_{X} in (X,d)(X,d) for every y∈Xy\in X. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity, (∣Qmy∣)m(|Q_{m}y|)_{m} then converges to ∣0X∣=d(0X,0X)=0|0_{X}|=d(0_{X},0_{X})=0 (The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §metric); so for every real δ>0\delta>0 there is m0m_{0} with ∣Qmy∣<δ|Q_{m}y|<\sqrt{\delta}, hence tm(y)<δt_{m}(y)<\delta by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, for all m≥m0m\ge m_{0}; that is, (tm(y))m(t_{m}(y))_{m} converges to 00. The function y↦∣y∣2y\mapsto|y|^{2} is nonnegative with integral M2(ν)<∞M_{2}(\nu)<\infty, hence integrable by (d), and it dominates every ∣tm∣=tm|t_{m}|=t_{m}. By claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem, applied on the measure space (X,B(X),ν)(X,\mathcal{B}(X),\nu) with fm=tmf_{m}=t_{m}, limit 00 and dominating function y↦∣y∣2y\mapsto|y|^{2}, the integrals ∫tm dν\int t_{m}\,d\nu converge to ∫0 dν=∫1∅ dν=ν(∅)=0\int0\,d\nu=\int\mathbf{1}_{\varnothing}\,d\nu=\nu(\varnothing)=0 (The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set), these integrals being the nonnegative ones by (d). Hence there is m1m_{1} with ∫tm dν<η\int t_{m}\,d\nu<\eta for all m≥m1m\ge m_{1}. Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with n≥m1n\ge m_{1} and 1≤n1\le n. Then

∫X∣Qny∣2 ν(dy)<η.\int_{X}|Q_{n}y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)<\eta .

Step 2 (the projected measure). The map pn:X→Rnp_{n}:X\to\mathbb{R}^{n} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, so νE=(pn)#ν\nu_{E}=(p_{n})_{\#}\nu is a measure on (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})) of total mass 11 by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward and (c); here B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §measures), which is the σ\sigma-algebra of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces, so νE∈P(Rn)\nu_{E}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) in the sense of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, ∥pn(y)∥2=∣Pny∣2=∣y∣2−∣Qny∣2≤∣y∣2\lVert p_{n}(y)\rVert^{2}=|P_{n}y|^{2}=|y|^{2}-|Q_{n}y|^{2}\le|y|^{2}. The map z↦∥z∥2z\mapsto\lVert z\rVert^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, so by change of variables and monotonicity,

M2(νE)=∫Rn∥z∥2 νE(dz)=∫X∥pn(y)∥2 ν(dy)≤M2(ν)<∞,M_{2}(\nu_{E})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert z\rVert^{2}\,\nu_{E}(dz)=\int_{X}\lVert p_{n}(y)\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)\le M_{2}(\nu)<\infty,

with M2(νE)M_{2}(\nu_{E}) as in The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment; thus νE∈P2(Rn)\nu_{E}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space.

Step 3 (Euclidean quantisation). By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §quantisation, applied with d=nd=n, both measures of its statement equal to νE\nu_{E}, and the positive real ε/2\varepsilon/2, there is a Borel map TE:Rn→RnT_{E}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} whose image is a finite set, with

∫Rn∥TE(z)−z∥2 νE(dz)≤(ε/2)2=η.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert T_{E}(z)-z\rVert^{2}\,\nu_{E}(dz)\le(\varepsilon/2)^{2}=\eta .

Step 4 (the map TT). Let T=pn∗∘TE∘pn:X→XT=p_{n}^{*}\circ T_{E}\circ p_{n}:X\to X, Borel as a composite of Borel maps, pn∗p_{n}^{*} being Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. The image TE(Rn)T_{E}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) is finite and nonempty, so by Finite Set it has kk elements for some k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}; pn∗p_{n}^{*} maps it onto pn∗(TE(Rn))p_{n}^{*}(T_{E}(\mathbb{R}^{n})), which is therefore finite by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and T(X)T(X) is a subset of it, hence finite by claim 3 there.

Fix y∈Xy\in X, and let w=TE(pn(y))w=T_{E}(p_{n}(y)) and x=T(y)−y=T(y)+(−1)yx=T(y)-y=T(y)+(-1)y (claims 2 and 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space). For k∈[n]k\in[n], conditions (a), (b) and (c) of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product give ⟨x,ek⟩=⟨T(y),ek⟩−⟨y,ek⟩\langle x,e_{k}\rangle=\langle T(y),e_{k}\rangle-\langle y,e_{k}\rangle, and ⟨T(y),ek⟩=⟨pn∗(w),ek⟩=wk\langle T(y),e_{k}\rangle=\langle p_{n}^{*}(w),e_{k}\rangle=w_{k} because pn(pn∗(w))=wp_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(w))=w by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. Hence pn(x)=w−pn(y)p_{n}(x)=w-p_{n}(y), the difference in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} being formed componentwise by claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space and Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Moreover, since Pn=pn∗∘pnP_{n}=p_{n}^{*}\circ p_{n} (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates), QnT(y)=pn∗(w)−pn∗(pn(pn∗(w)))=pn∗(w)−pn∗(w)=0XQ_{n}T(y)=p_{n}^{*}(w)-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(w)))=p_{n}^{*}(w)-p_{n}^{*}(w)=0_{X}, and QnQ_{n} is linear by Exhausting Sequences of Finite-Dimensional Subspaces in a Separable Real Hilbert Space, and Their Projections §projections (applicable as in Step 1), so Qnx=QnT(y)+(−1)Qny=(−1)QnyQ_{n}x=Q_{n}T(y)+(-1)Q_{n}y=(-1)Q_{n}y; by conditions (a) and (c) of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product and Real Inner Product Space §norm, ∣Qnx∣2=⟨(−1)Qny,(−1)Qny⟩=⟨Qny,Qny⟩=∣Qny∣2|Q_{n}x|^{2}=\langle(-1)Q_{n}y,(-1)Q_{n}y\rangle=\langle Q_{n}y,Q_{n}y\rangle=|Q_{n}y|^{2}. By the identities ∣x∣2=∣Pnx∣2+∣Qnx∣2|x|^{2}=|P_{n}x|^{2}+|Q_{n}x|^{2} and ∣Pnx∣=∥pn(x)∥|P_{n}x|=\lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert of Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity,

∣T(y)−y∣2=∥pn(x)∥2+∣Qnx∣2=∥TE(pn(y))−pn(y)∥2+∣Qny∣2.|T(y)-y|^{2}=\lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}+|Q_{n}x|^{2}=\lVert T_{E}(p_{n}(y))-p_{n}(y)\rVert^{2}+|Q_{n}y|^{2}.

Step 5 (the estimate). The map z↦∥TE(z)−z∥2z\mapsto\lVert T_{E}(z)-z\rVert^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (with u=TEu=T_{E} and vv the identity), so its composite with pnp_{n} is Borel. Integrating the identity of Step 4 against ν\nu, by claim 1 of the integral theorem, change of variables through pnp_{n}, Step 3 and Step 1,

∫X∣T(y)−y∣2 ν(dy)=∫Rn∥TE(z)−z∥2 νE(dz)+∫X∣Qny∣2 ν(dy)≤η+η=ε22≤ε2.\int_{X}|T(y)-y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert T_{E}(z)-z\rVert^{2}\,\nu_{E}(dz)+\int_{X}|Q_{n}y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)\le\eta+\eta=\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{2}\le\varepsilon^{2}.

Claim 7. Step 1 (the atoms). Finite subsets of XX and their complements are Borel, as recorded in the statement; in particular every singleton {a}\{a\} is Borel, being finite by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets and Finite Set. Let F+={a∈F:0<ρ({a})}F_{+}=\{a\in F:0<\rho(\{a\})\}, finite by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and for a∈F+a\in F_{+} write ra=ρ({a})r_{a}=\rho(\{a\}), so that 0<ra≤ρ(X)=10<r_{a}\le\rho(X)=1 by claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure. Every b∈F∖F+b\in F\setminus F_{+} has ρ({b})=0\rho(\{b\})=0. The set F∖F+F\setminus F_{+} is finite by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, so it is empty or, by Finite Set, the image of a bijection from some [k][k]; in either case ρ(F∖F+)=0\rho(F\setminus F_{+})=0, as the sum of the values ρ({b})=0\rho(\{b\})=0 by claim 1 of Basic Properties of a Measure. Since X∖F+X\setminus F_{+} is the disjoint union of X∖FX\setminus F and F∖F+F\setminus F_{+}, the same claim gives ρ(X∖F+)=ρ(X∖F)+ρ(F∖F+)=0\rho(X\setminus F_{+})=\rho(X\setminus F)+\rho(F\setminus F_{+})=0, and then ρ(F+)=1\rho(F_{+})=1 by claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure; so F+F_{+} is nonempty, and by Finite Set we fix a bijection from some [k][k] onto F+F_{+}, through which sums over a∈F+a\in F_{+} are finite sums.

For a∈F+a\in F_{+} let Aa=π2−1({a})A_{a}=\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{a\}) and Ba=π1−1({a})B_{a}=\pi_{1}^{-1}(\{a\}), Borel subsets of X×XX\times X. As π12∈Π(μ,ρ)\pi_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\rho) and π23∈Π(ρ,λ)\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\rho,\lambda), Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling gives π12(Aa)=ρ({a})=ra=π23(Ba)\pi_{12}(A_{a})=\rho(\{a\})=r_{a}=\pi_{23}(B_{a}), and likewise π12(π2−1(X∖F+))=ρ(X∖F+)=0\pi_{12}(\pi_{2}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+}))=\rho(X\setminus F_{+})=0 and π23(π1−1(X∖F+))=0\pi_{23}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+}))=0. The sets AaA_{a}, a∈F+a\in F_{+}, are pairwise disjoint with union π2−1(F+)\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+}), so ∑a∈F+1Aa=1π2−1(F+)\sum_{a\in F_{+}}\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}=\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+})}; likewise ∑a∈F+1Ba=1π1−1(F+)\sum_{a\in F_{+}}\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}=\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{1}^{-1}(F_{+})}.

Step 2 (the density). Let Ω=(X×X)×(X×X)\Omega=(X\times X)\times(X\times X) with the product σ\sigma-algebra G=B(X×X)⊗B(X×X)\mathcal{G}=\mathcal{B}(X\times X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(X\times X) of Product Sigma-Algebra, and let κ1,κ2:Ω→X×X\kappa_{1},\kappa_{2}:\Omega\to X\times X be the factor maps κ1(z,z′)=z\kappa_{1}(z,z')=z, κ2(z,z′)=z′\kappa_{2}(z,z')=z'. They are measurable with respect to G\mathcal{G} and B(X×X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X), since κ1−1(E)=E×(X×X)\kappa_{1}^{-1}(E)=E\times(X\times X) and κ2−1(E)=(X×X)×E\kappa_{2}^{-1}(E)=(X\times X)\times E are measurable rectangles, which belong to G\mathcal{G} by Product Sigma-Algebra. The probability measures π12\pi_{12} and π23\pi_{23} are σ\sigma-finite (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure), so Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure provides the product measure θ0=π12⊗π23\theta_{0}=\pi_{12}\otimes\pi_{23} on (Ω,G)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}). Let

h=∑a∈F+ra−1 1Aa×Ba:Ω→[0,∞),h=\sum_{a\in F_{+}}r_{a}^{-1}\,\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}\times B_{a}}:\Omega\to[0,\infty),

measurable by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, each Aa×BaA_{a}\times B_{a} being a measurable rectangle; note 1Aa×Ba(ζ)=1Aa(κ1ζ) 1Ba(κ2ζ)\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}\times B_{a}}(\zeta)=\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}(\kappa_{1}\zeta)\,\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}(\kappa_{2}\zeta). Let θ\theta be the measure on (Ω,G)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}) with density hh with respect to θ0\theta_{0}, so that by the density formula ∫G dθ=∫Gh dθ0\int G\,d\theta=\int Gh\,d\theta_{0} for every measurable G:Ω→[0,∞]G:\Omega\to[0,\infty].

Step 3 (two disintegration identities). Let g:X×X→[0,∞)g:X\times X\to[0,\infty) be Borel. We claim, and refer to as (∗)(\ast),

∫Ωg(κ1ζ) h(ζ) θ0(dζ)=∫X×Xg dπ12and∫Ωg(κ2ζ) h(ζ) θ0(dζ)=∫X×Xg dπ23.\int_{\Omega}g(\kappa_{1}\zeta)\,h(\zeta)\,\theta_{0}(d\zeta)=\int_{X\times X}g\,d\pi_{12}\qquad\text{and}\qquad\int_{\Omega}g(\kappa_{2}\zeta)\,h(\zeta)\,\theta_{0}(d\zeta)=\int_{X\times X}g\,d\pi_{23}.

For the first, let Ga(ζ)=g(κ1ζ)1Aa(κ1ζ)1Ba(κ2ζ)G_{a}(\zeta)=g(\kappa_{1}\zeta)\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}(\kappa_{1}\zeta)\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}(\kappa_{2}\zeta) for a∈F+a\in F_{+}, a nonnegative G\mathcal{G}-measurable function by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions; then g(κ1ζ)h(ζ)=∑a∈F+ra−1Ga(ζ)g(\kappa_{1}\zeta)h(\zeta)=\sum_{a\in F_{+}}r_{a}^{-1}G_{a}(\zeta), and claim 1 of the integral theorem gives ∫(g∘κ1)h dθ0=∑a∈F+ra−1∫Ga dθ0\int(g\circ\kappa_{1})h\,d\theta_{0}=\sum_{a\in F_{+}}r_{a}^{-1}\int G_{a}\,d\theta_{0}. By the Tonelli clause of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems,

∫ΩGa dθ0=∫X×X(∫X×Xg(z)1Aa(z)1Ba(z′) π23(dz′))π12(dz).\int_{\Omega}G_{a}\,d\theta_{0}=\int_{X\times X}\Bigl(\int_{X\times X}g(z)\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}(z)\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}(z')\,\pi_{23}(dz')\Bigr)\pi_{12}(dz).

For fixed zz the inner integrand is the constant c=g(z)1Aa(z)∈[0,∞)c=g(z)\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}(z)\in[0,\infty) times 1Ba\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}, so the inner integral is c π23(Ba)=ra g(z)1Aa(z)c\,\pi_{23}(B_{a})=r_{a}\,g(z)\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}(z) by claim 1 of the integral theorem and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set; hence ∫Ga dθ0=ra∫g1Aa dπ12\int G_{a}\,d\theta_{0}=r_{a}\int g\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}\,d\pi_{12} by the same claim. Summing, and using claim 1 of the integral theorem and Step 1,

∫Ω(g∘κ1)h dθ0=∑a∈F+∫g1Aa dπ12=∫g 1π2−1(F+) dπ12.\int_{\Omega}(g\circ\kappa_{1})h\,d\theta_{0}=\sum_{a\in F_{+}}\int g\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}\,d\pi_{12}=\int g\,\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+})}\,d\pi_{12}.

The integrands gg and g1π2−1(F+)g\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+})} agree off π2−1(X∖F+)\pi_{2}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+}), which is π12\pi_{12}-null by Step 1, so their integrals coincide by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison; this proves the first identity. The second is proved in the same way with Ga′(ζ)=g(κ2ζ)1Aa(κ1ζ)1Ba(κ2ζ)G'_{a}(\zeta)=g(\kappa_{2}\zeta)\mathbf{1}_{A_{a}}(\kappa_{1}\zeta)\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}(\kappa_{2}\zeta) and the other order of integration in Tonelli's theorem: for fixed z′z' the inner π12\pi_{12}-integral is g(z′)1Ba(z′)π12(Aa)=ra g(z′)1Ba(z′)g(z')\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}(z')\pi_{12}(A_{a})=r_{a}\,g(z')\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}(z'), so ∫(g∘κ2)h dθ0=∑a∈F+∫g1Ba dπ23=∫g1π1−1(F+) dπ23=∫g dπ23\int(g\circ\kappa_{2})h\,d\theta_{0}=\sum_{a\in F_{+}}\int g\mathbf{1}_{B_{a}}\,d\pi_{23}=\int g\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{1}^{-1}(F_{+})}\,d\pi_{23}=\int g\,d\pi_{23}, the last step because π1−1(X∖F+)\pi_{1}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+}) is π23\pi_{23}-null.

Step 4 (the glued coupling). By the density formula, The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set and (∗)(\ast) with gg the constant 11, θ(Ω)=∫h dθ0=π12(X×X)=1\theta(\Omega)=\int h\,d\theta_{0}=\pi_{12}(X\times X)=1, so (Ω,G,θ)(\Omega,\mathcal{G},\theta) is a probability space. Let Φ=(π1∘κ1,π2∘κ2):Ω→X×X\Phi=(\pi_{1}\circ\kappa_{1},\pi_{2}\circ\kappa_{2}):\Omega\to X\times X, measurable with respect to G\mathcal{G} and B(X×X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X) by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and let π13=Φ#θ\pi_{13}=\Phi_{\#}\theta, which lies in P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X) by (c). For A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X), by (c), the density formula and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set,

((π1)#π13)(A)=θ(κ1−1(π1−1(A)))=∫Ω1π1−1(A)(κ1ζ) h(ζ) θ0(dζ)=π12(π1−1(A))=μ(A),\bigl((\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi_{13}\bigr)(A)=\theta\bigl(\kappa_{1}^{-1}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(A))\bigr)=\int_{\Omega}\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{1}^{-1}(A)}(\kappa_{1}\zeta)\,h(\zeta)\,\theta_{0}(d\zeta)=\pi_{12}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(A))=\mu(A),

the third equality by (∗)(\ast) with the Borel function g=1π1−1(A)g=\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{1}^{-1}(A)} (claim 1 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions). Likewise, for C∈B(X)C\in\mathcal{B}(X), ((π2)#π13)(C)=∫(1π2−1(C)∘κ2)h dθ0=π23(π2−1(C))=λ(C)((\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{13})(C)=\int(\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{2}^{-1}(C)}\circ\kappa_{2})h\,d\theta_{0}=\pi_{23}(\pi_{2}^{-1}(C))=\lambda(C). Hence π13∈Π(μ,λ)\pi_{13}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling.

Step 5 (the cost bound). On the probability space (Ω,G,θ)(\Omega,\mathcal{G},\theta) let f=φ0∘κ1f=\varphi_{0}\circ\kappa_{1} and f′=φ0∘κ2f'=\varphi_{0}\circ\kappa_{2}, measurable by (b). By the density formula and (∗)(\ast) with g=φg=\varphi, ∫f2 dθ=∫(φ∘κ1)h dθ0=∫φ dπ12=I(π12)<∞\int f^{2}\,d\theta=\int(\varphi\circ\kappa_{1})h\,d\theta_{0}=\int\varphi\,d\pi_{12}=I(\pi_{12})<\infty, and similarly ∫f′2 dθ=I(π23)<∞\int f'^{2}\,d\theta=I(\pi_{23})<\infty; so by (d), ff, f′f' and f+f′f+f' are square-integrable, with ∥f∥2=I(π12)\lVert f\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi_{12})} and ∥f′∥2=I(π23)\lVert f'\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi_{23})}. Let u=φ∘Φu=\varphi\circ\Phi, so that u(ζ)=∣π1(κ1ζ)−π2(κ2ζ)∣2u(\zeta)=|\pi_{1}(\kappa_{1}\zeta)-\pi_{2}(\kappa_{2}\zeta)|^{2} by (c). Let ζ=(z,z′)∈Ω\zeta=(z,z')\in\Omega. If h(ζ)>0h(\zeta)>0, some term of hh is nonzero at ζ\zeta, so z∈Aaz\in A_{a} and z′∈Baz'\in B_{a} for some a∈F+a\in F_{+}, that is, π2(z)=a=π1(z′)\pi_{2}(z)=a=\pi_{1}(z'); then π1(z)−π2(z′)=(π1(z)−π2(z))+(π1(z′)−π2(z′))\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z')=(\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z))+(\pi_{1}(z')-\pi_{2}(z')) by the vector-space axioms (Vector Space over a Field), so ∣π1(z)−π2(z′)∣≤f(ζ)+f′(ζ)|\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z')|\le f(\zeta)+f'(\zeta) and u(ζ)≤(f(ζ)+f′(ζ))2u(\zeta)\le(f(\zeta)+f'(\zeta))^{2} by (a). If h(ζ)=0h(\zeta)=0, both u(ζ)h(ζ)u(\zeta)h(\zeta) and (f(ζ)+f′(ζ))2h(ζ)(f(\zeta)+f'(\zeta))^{2}h(\zeta) vanish. Hence uh≤(f+f′)2huh\le(f+f')^{2}h pointwise, and by change of variables, the density formula, monotonicity in claim 1 of the integral theorem and claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm,

I(π13)=∫φ∘Φ dθ=∫uh dθ0≤∫(f+f′)2h dθ0=∫(f+f′)2 dθ=∥f+f′∥22≤(∥f∥2+∥f′∥2)2.I(\pi_{13})=\int\varphi\circ\Phi\,d\theta=\int uh\,d\theta_{0}\le\int(f+f')^{2}h\,d\theta_{0}=\int(f+f')^{2}\,d\theta=\lVert f+f'\rVert_{2}^{2}\le\bigl(\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert f'\rVert_{2}\bigr)^{2}.

So I(π13)I(\pi_{13}) is finite and I(π13)≤∥f∥2+∥f′∥2=I(π12)+I(π23)\sqrt{I(\pi_{13})}\le\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert f'\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi_{12})}+\sqrt{I(\pi_{23})} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Claim 8. A Lipschitz ff is continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous, hence Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; being bounded, with a bound MM as in Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set, it is integrable with respect to μ\mu and to ν\nu by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. By change of variables in the integrable case, f∘π1f\circ\pi_{1} and f∘π2f\circ\pi_{2} are π\pi-integrable with ∫f∘π1 dπ=∫f dμ\int f\circ\pi_{1}\,d\pi=\int f\,d\mu and ∫f∘π2 dπ=∫f dν\int f\circ\pi_{2}\,d\pi=\int f\,d\nu. For every zz, ∣f(π1(z))−f(π2(z))∣≤L φ0(z)|f(\pi_{1}(z))-f(\pi_{2}(z))|\le L\,\varphi_{0}(z) by the Lipschitz property. By claim 2 of the integral theorem, then monotonicity and homogeneity in its claim 1 (the integral of the integrable function ∣f∘π1−f∘π2∣|f\circ\pi_{1}-f\circ\pi_{2}| being its nonnegative integral by (d)),

∣∫f dμ−∫f dν∣=∣∫(f∘π1−f∘π2) dπ∣≤∫∣f∘π1−f∘π2∣ dπ≤L∫φ0 dπ.\Bigl|\int f\,d\mu-\int f\,d\nu\Bigr|=\Bigl|\int(f\circ\pi_{1}-f\circ\pi_{2})\,d\pi\Bigr|\le\int|f\circ\pi_{1}-f\circ\pi_{2}|\,d\pi\le L\int\varphi_{0}\,d\pi .

On the probability space (X×X,B(X×X),π)(X\times X,\mathcal{B}(X\times X),\pi) the function φ0\varphi_{0} is square-integrable with ∥φ0∥2=I(π)\lVert\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)} by (d), as φ02=φ\varphi_{0}^{2}=\varphi and I(π)<∞I(\pi)<\infty, and the constant 11 is square-integrable with ∥1∥2=1\lVert1\rVert_{2}=1 by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set with the set X×XX\times X. So ∫φ0 dπ=E[φ0⋅1]≤∥φ0∥2∥1∥2=I(π)\int\varphi_{0}\,d\pi=\mathbb{E}[\varphi_{0}\cdot1]\le\lVert\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}\lVert1\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)} by claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm, the expectation being the integral by (d) and Expectation, Variance, and Moments. As 0≤L0\le L, combining gives ∣∫f dμ−∫f dν∣≤LI(π)|\int f\,d\mu-\int f\,d\nu|\le L\sqrt{I(\pi)}.

Claim 9. Let μ,ν∈P2(X)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and π∈Π(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu). By claim 3, I(π)<∞I(\pi)<\infty. On the probability space (X×X,B(X×X),π)(X\times X,\mathcal{B}(X\times X),\pi) let a(z)=∣π1(z)∣a(z)=|\pi_{1}(z)| and b(z)=∣π2(z)∣b(z)=|\pi_{2}(z)|, Borel by (b). By change of variables and The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment, ∫a2 dπ=M2(μ)<∞\int a^{2}\,d\pi=M_{2}(\mu)<\infty and ∫b2 dπ=M2(ν)<∞\int b^{2}\,d\pi=M_{2}(\nu)<\infty, and ∫φ02 dπ=I(π)<∞\int\varphi_{0}^{2}\,d\pi=I(\pi)<\infty; so by (d), aa, bb and φ0\varphi_{0} are square-integrable, with ∥a∥2=M2(μ)\lVert a\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu)}, ∥b∥2=M2(ν)\lVert b\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu)} and ∥φ0∥2=I(π)\lVert\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)}, and so are b+φ0b+\varphi_{0} and a+φ0a+\varphi_{0}. For every zz, π1(z)=π2(z)+(π1(z)−π2(z))\pi_{1}(z)=\pi_{2}(z)+(\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z)) by the vector-space axioms (Vector Space over a Field), so (a) gives a(z)≤b(z)+φ0(z)a(z)\le b(z)+\varphi_{0}(z) and a(z)2≤(b(z)+φ0(z))2a(z)^{2}\le(b(z)+\varphi_{0}(z))^{2}. By monotonicity in claim 1 of the integral theorem, ∥a∥22≤∥b+φ0∥22\lVert a\rVert_{2}^{2}\le\lVert b+\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}^{2}, so ∥a∥2≤∥b+φ0∥2≤∥b∥2+∥φ0∥2\lVert a\rVert_{2}\le\lVert b+\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}\le\lVert b\rVert_{2}+\lVert\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm; that is, M2(μ)−M2(ν)≤I(π)\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu)}-\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu)}\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}. Symmetrically, π2(z)=π1(z)+(π2(z)−π1(z))\pi_{2}(z)=\pi_{1}(z)+(\pi_{2}(z)-\pi_{1}(z)) and ∣π2(z)−π1(z)∣=φ0(z)|\pi_{2}(z)-\pi_{1}(z)|=\varphi_{0}(z) by (a), so b(z)≤a(z)+φ0(z)b(z)\le a(z)+\varphi_{0}(z), and the same argument gives M2(ν)−M2(μ)≤I(π)\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu)}-\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu)}\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}. The two inequalities together give ∣M2(μ)−M2(ν)∣≤I(π)\bigl|\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu)}-\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu)}\bigr|\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…