TheoremBase

Powers are finite products of a constant family, so the first clauses follow from the properties of finite products; exponent addition is proved by induction, and monotonicity in the exponent follows from it once powers of a base at least 1 are shown to be at least 1.

Proof

By Natural Number Power of an Element of a Field, cnc^{n} is the finite product ∏k=1nak\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k} of the map aa on the initial segment [n][n] whose value at every index is cc; write bb and ee for the corresponding constant maps with values dd and c dc\,d. In claims 1 to 5 below, references to numbered claims are to Properties of Finite Products.

Claim 1. Both identities are claim 1, since the constant map on [S(n)][S(n)] with value cc restricts to the constant map on [n][n] with value cc, so that ∏k=1n\prod_{k=1}^{n} may be read for either family.

Claim 2. We argue by induction on nn, using the induction principle for the natural numbers. By claim 1, 11=11^{1}=1. If 1n=11^{n}=1, then 1S(n)=1nβ‹…1=1β‹…1=11^{S(n)}=1^{n}\cdot1=1\cdot1=1 by claim 1 and the defining property of the multiplicative identity.

Claim 3. For every k∈[n]k\in[n] we have ek=c d=ak bke_{k}=c\,d=a_{k}\,b_{k}, so claim 2 gives

(c d)n=∏k=1n(akbk)=(∏k=1nak)(∏k=1nbk)=cn dn.(c\,d)^{n}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(a_{k}b_{k}\bigr)=\Bigl(\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\Bigr)\Bigl(\prod_{k=1}^{n}b_{k}\Bigr)=c^{n}\,d^{n}.

Claim 4. By claim 4, ∏k=1nak=0\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}=0 holds if and only if ai=0a_{i}=0 for some i∈[n]i\in[n]. Every value of aa is cc, and [n][n] is nonempty since 1∈[n]1\in[n], so this condition holds if and only if c=0c=0.

Claim 5. Since 0≀ak0\le a_{k} for every k∈[n]k\in[n], the first part of claim 5 gives 0β‰€βˆk=1nak=cn0\le\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}=c^{n}. If in addition c≀dc\le d, then ak≀bka_{k}\le b_{k} for every k∈[n]k\in[n], so the second part of claim 5 gives cn=∏k=1nakβ‰€βˆk=1nbk=dnc^{n}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\le\prod_{k=1}^{n}b_{k}=d^{n}.

The remaining two claims cite clauses of the present statement as "clause kk", to keep them apart from the claims of the finite-product lemma.

Claim 6. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and let EE be the set of j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N} with cm+j=cmcjc^{m+j}=c^{m}c^{j}. By Natural Numbers, m+1=S(m)m+1=S(m) and m+S(j)=S(m+j)m+S(j)=S(m+j) for every jj. Clause 1 gives cm+1=cS(m)=cmc=cmc1c^{m+1}=c^{S(m)}=c^{m}c=c^{m}c^{1}, so 1∈E1\in E. If j∈Ej\in E, then clause 1 and associativity of multiplication give

cm+S(j)=cS(m+j)=cm+j c=(cmcj)c=cm(cjc)=cmcS(j),c^{m+S(j)}=c^{S(m+j)}=c^{m+j}\,c=\bigl(c^{m}c^{j}\bigr)c=c^{m}\bigl(c^{j}c\bigr)=c^{m}c^{S(j)},

so S(j)∈ES(j)\in E. By Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, applied to EE, we get E=NE=\mathbb{N}; in particular n∈En\in E.

Claim 7. Here 0≀10\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 0≀c0\le c by transitivity, and clause 5 gives 0≀ck0\le c^{k} for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. We first show 1≀ck1\le c^{k} for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Let AA be the set of k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with 1≀ck1\le c^{k}. Then 1∈A1\in A, since c1=cc^{1}=c by clause 1. Let k∈Ak\in A. Claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to 1≀c1\le c and 0≀ck0\le c^{k}, gives ckβ‹…1≀ckcc^{k}\cdot1\le c^{k}c. Here ckc=cS(k)c^{k}c=c^{S(k)} by clause 1, and ckβ‹…1=ckc^{k}\cdot1=c^{k}. Thus 1≀ck=ckβ‹…1≀ckc=cS(k)1\le c^{k}=c^{k}\cdot1\le c^{k}c=c^{S(k)}, and transitivity gives 1≀cS(k)1\le c^{S(k)}, so S(k)∈AS(k)\in A. By Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, applied to AA, we get A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

Now let m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with m≀nm\le n. If m=nm=n, there is nothing to prove. Otherwise m<nm<n, and claim 7 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers gives k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with n=m+kn=m+k. Clause 6, applied with the exponents mm and kk, gives cn=cmckc^{n}=c^{m}c^{k}. Claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to 1≀ck1\le c^{k} and 0≀cm0\le c^{m}, gives cm=cmβ‹…1≀cmck=cnc^{m}=c^{m}\cdot1\le c^{m}c^{k}=c^{n}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…