TheoremBase

Proof of Quadratic Test Functions, Limits, Translation and Locality for Approximability by Test Data

lemmalem:test-data-basic-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 12,026 chars · 15 deps · depth 19 Reason: First publication of the proof: the quadratic characterisation is obtained by expanding a test function to second order and absorbing the remainder into a multiple of the identity, and conversely by taking the quadratic itself as test function.

The quadratic characterisation is obtained in one direction by expanding a test function to second order and absorbing the remainder into a multiple of the identity, and in the other by taking the quadratic itself as test function; the remaining claims are then routine consequences, since a quadratic test function is defined on all of Euclidean space.

Proof

Throughout we use the notation of the statement. We record that εInS(n)\varepsilon I_{n}\in\mathcal{S}(n) with εIn=ε\lVert\varepsilon I_{n}\rVert=|\varepsilon| for every εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R}, by Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §identity, and that h((εIn)h)=εh2h\cdot\bigl((\varepsilon I_{n})h\bigr)=\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2} for every hRnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, by claims 1 and 2 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Claim 1. Suppose first that (x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu, and let ε\varepsilon be positive. Put ε=ε2\varepsilon'=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data §above applied with ε\varepsilon' there are yUy\in U and φ:UR\varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} of class C2C^{2} on UU such that uφu-\varphi has a local maximum at yy relative to UU and

dE(y,x0)<ε,u(y)u(x0)<ε,Dφ(y)p<ε,dS(n)(D2φ(y),X)<ε.d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\varepsilon',\quad |u(y)-u(x_{0})|<\varepsilon',\quad \lVert D\varphi(y)-p\rVert<\varepsilon',\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y),X\bigr)<\varepsilon'.

Put r=Dφ(y)r=D\varphi(y) and Y=D2φ(y)+εInY=D^{2}\varphi(y)+\varepsilon'I_{n}, which lies in S(n)\mathcal{S}(n) by claim 1 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure. Since YX=(D2φ(y)X)+εInY-X=\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y)-X\bigr)+\varepsilon'I_{n}, claim 5 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix gives

dS(n)(Y,X)=YXdS(n)(D2φ(y),X)+ε<ε+ε=ε,d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X)=\lVert Y-X\rVert\le d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y),X\bigr)+\varepsilon'<\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'=\varepsilon,

and the first three displayed inequalities hold a fortiori with ε\varepsilon in place of ε\varepsilon', since ε<ε\varepsilon'<\varepsilon.

By Basic Properties of Twice Differentiability at a Point §c2 the function φ\varphi is twice differentiable at yy with first-order coefficient Dφ(y)=rD\varphi(y)=r and Hessian D2φ(y)D^{2}\varphi(y). Applying Twice Differentiability at a Point §twice-differentiable with the positive parameter ε2\tfrac{\varepsilon'}{2}, there is a positive δ1\delta_{1} such that every hRnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with h<δ1\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{1} satisfies y+hUy+h\in U and

φ(y+h)φ(y)rh12h(D2φ(y)h)ε2h2,\varphi(y+h)-\varphi(y)-r\cdot h-\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y)h\bigr)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon'}{2}\lVert h\rVert^{2},

using claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Since 12h(Yh)=12h(D2φ(y)h)+ε2h2\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot(Yh)=\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y)h\bigr)+\tfrac{\varepsilon'}{2}\lVert h\rVert^{2} by claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the identity recorded at the start, this reads

φ(y+h)φ(y)rh+12h(Yh)whenever h<δ1.\varphi(y+h)-\varphi(y)\le r\cdot h+\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot(Yh)\qquad\text{whenever }\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{1}.

Let δ2\delta_{2} be positive with the property that every zUz\in U with dE(z,y)<δ2d_{E}(z,y)<\delta_{2} satisfies u(z)φ(z)u(y)φ(y)u(z)-\varphi(z)\le u(y)-\varphi(y), as provided by Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space, and let δ\delta be the smaller of δ1\delta_{1} and δ2\delta_{2}. For zUz\in U with dE(z,y)<δd_{E}(z,y)<\delta, put h=zyh=z-y, so that h=dE(z,y)<δ1\lVert h\rVert=d_{E}(z,y)<\delta_{1} by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n; then

u(z)u(y)+φ(z)φ(y)u(y)+r(zy)+12(zy)(Y(zy)),u(z)\le u(y)+\varphi(z)-\varphi(y)\le u(y)+r\cdot(z-y)+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-y)\cdot\bigl(Y(z-y)\bigr),

which is the required inequality.

Conversely, suppose the stated condition holds and let ε\varepsilon be positive; take yy, rr, YY and δ\delta as provided. By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic the function Ψ:RnR\Psi:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} with Ψ(ζ)=12ζ(Yζ)+rζ+u(y)\Psi(\zeta)=\tfrac{1}{2}\zeta\cdot(Y\zeta)+r\cdot\zeta+u(y) is of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with DΨ(ζ)=Yζ+rD\Psi(\zeta)=Y\zeta+r and D2Ψ(ζ)=YD^{2}\Psi(\zeta)=Y. By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §translation, applied with the vector y-y, for which Rn(y)=Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}-(-y)=\mathbb{R}^{n}, the function φ0:RnR\varphi_{0}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} with φ0(z)=Ψ(zy)\varphi_{0}(z)=\Psi(z-y) is of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with Dφ0(z)=Y(zy)+rD\varphi_{0}(z)=Y(z-y)+r and D2φ0(z)=YD^{2}\varphi_{0}(z)=Y; explicitly

φ0(z)=u(y)+r(zy)+12(zy)(Y(zy)),\varphi_{0}(z)=u(y)+r\cdot(z-y)+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-y)\cdot\bigl(Y(z-y)\bigr),

so that φ0(y)=u(y)\varphi_{0}(y)=u(y), Dφ0(y)=rD\varphi_{0}(y)=r and D2φ0(y)=YD^{2}\varphi_{0}(y)=Y. Let φ\varphi be the restriction of φ0\varphi_{0} to UU, which is of class C2C^{2} on UU with the same gradient and Hessian at points of UU, by claims 1 and 3 of Restriction of a CkC^k Map to an Open Subset. For zUz\in U with dE(z,y)<δd_{E}(z,y)<\delta the hypothesis gives u(z)φ(z)u(z)\le\varphi(z), hence

u(z)φ(z)0=u(y)φ(y),u(z)-\varphi(z)\le0=u(y)-\varphi(y),

so uφu-\varphi has a local maximum at yy relative to UU. Since Dφ(y)=rD\varphi(y)=r and D2φ(y)=YD^{2}\varphi(y)=Y, the four numerical inequalities of Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data §above are exactly those assumed, and the quadruple is approximable by test data from above for uu.

For approximability from below the argument is the same with Y=D2φ(y)εInY=D^{2}\varphi(y)-\varepsilon'I_{n} in the first direction, all the inequalities between values of uu and of φ\varphi reversed, local minima in place of local maxima, and εIn=ε\lVert-\varepsilon'I_{n}\rVert=\varepsilon' used in the estimate of dS(n)(Y,X)d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X).

Claim 2. Let ε\varepsilon be positive. Take y=x0y=x_{0}, r=pr=p and Y=X+ε2InS(n)Y=X+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}I_{n}\in\mathcal{S}(n). Then dE(y,x0)=0<εd_{E}(y,x_{0})=0<\varepsilon and u(y)u(x0)=0<ε|u(y)-u(x_{0})|=0<\varepsilon and rp=0<ε\lVert r-p\rVert=0<\varepsilon, by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, while dS(n)(Y,X)=ε2In=ε2<εd_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X)=\lVert\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}I_{n}\rVert=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<\varepsilon. Applying Twice Differentiability at a Point §twice-differentiable with the positive parameter ε4\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}, there is a positive δ\delta such that h<δ\lVert h\rVert<\delta implies x0+hUx_{0}+h\in U and

u(x0+h)u(x0)ph12h(Xh)ε4h2.u(x_{0}+h)-u(x_{0})-p\cdot h-\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot(Xh)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

Since 12h(Yh)=12h(Xh)+ε4h2\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot(Yh)=\tfrac{1}{2}h\cdot(Xh)+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}\lVert h\rVert^{2}, this gives, for zUz\in U with dE(z,x0)<δd_{E}(z,x_{0})<\delta and h=zyh=z-y,

u(z)u(y)+r(zy)+12(zy)(Y(zy)),u(z)\le u(y)+r\cdot(z-y)+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-y)\cdot\bigl(Y(z-y)\bigr),

so claim 1 gives approximability from above. Taking instead Y=Xε2InY=X-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}I_{n} and using the lower estimate supplied by the same application of Twice Differentiability at a Point §twice-differentiable gives approximability from below.

Claim 3. Let ε\varepsilon be positive and put ε=ε2\varepsilon'=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}. By the four convergence hypotheses there are N1,N2,N3,N4NN_{1},N_{2},N_{3},N_{4}\in\mathbb{N} beyond which the corresponding distances are smaller than ε\varepsilon'; put k=N1+N2+N3+N4k=N_{1}+N_{2}+N_{3}+N_{4}, which is at least each of them since natural numbers are nonnegative, so that

dE(yk,x0)<ε,u(yk)u(x0)<ε,pkp<ε,dS(n)(Xk,X)<ε.d_{E}(y_{k},x_{0})<\varepsilon',\quad |u(y_{k})-u(x_{0})|<\varepsilon',\quad \lVert p_{k}-p\rVert<\varepsilon',\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(X_{k},X)<\varepsilon' .

Since (yk,u(yk),pk,Xk)\bigl(y_{k},u(y_{k}),p_{k},X_{k}\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu, claim 1 applied with ε\varepsilon' yields yUy\in U, rRnr\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, YS(n)Y\in\mathcal{S}(n) and a positive δ\delta with

dE(y,yk)<ε,u(y)u(yk)<ε,rpk<ε,dS(n)(Y,Xk)<εd_{E}(y,y_{k})<\varepsilon',\quad |u(y)-u(y_{k})|<\varepsilon',\quad \lVert r-p_{k}\rVert<\varepsilon',\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{k})<\varepsilon'

and u(z)u(y)+r(zy)+12(zy)(Y(zy))u(z)\le u(y)+r\cdot(z-y)+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-y)\cdot(Y(z-y)) for every zUz\in U with dE(z,y)<δd_{E}(z,y)<\delta. The triangle inequality for the metric dEd_{E}, for the absolute value (claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), for the Euclidean norm (claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) and for the metric dS(n)d_{\mathcal{S}(n)} gives

dE(y,x0)<ε,u(y)u(x0)<ε,rp<ε,dS(n)(Y,X)<ε.d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\varepsilon,\quad |u(y)-u(x_{0})|<\varepsilon,\quad \lVert r-p\rVert<\varepsilon,\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X)<\varepsilon .

As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, claim 1 shows that (x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu. The argument for approximability from below is identical.

Claim 4. Note that x0bUbx_{0}-b\in U-b and that u~(x0b)=u(x0)+q(x0b)+c\tilde{u}(x_{0}-b)=u(x_{0})+q\cdot(x_{0}-b)+c.

Assume (x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu and let ε\varepsilon be positive. The number 1+q1+\lVert q\rVert is positive, so ε1=ε(1+q)1\varepsilon_{1}=\varepsilon\,(1+\lVert q\rVert)^{-1} is positive, and ε1ε\varepsilon_{1}\le\varepsilon because 11+q1\le1+\lVert q\rVert. Apply claim 1 with ε1\varepsilon_{1} to obtain yUy\in U, rr, YY and a positive δ\delta. Put y~=ybUb\tilde{y}=y-b\in U-b and r~=r+q\tilde{r}=r+q. Then, by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the vector space identities,

dE(y~,x0b)=yx0=dE(y,x0)<ε1ε,d_{E}(\tilde{y},x_{0}-b)=\lVert y-x_{0}\rVert=d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\varepsilon_{1}\le\varepsilon,

and r~(p+q)=rp<ε\lVert\tilde{r}-(p+q)\rVert=\lVert r-p\rVert<\varepsilon, and dS(n)(Y,X)<εd_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X)<\varepsilon. Moreover

u~(y~)u~(x0b)=(u(y)u(x0))+q(yx0),\tilde{u}(\tilde{y})-\tilde{u}(x_{0}-b)=\bigl(u(y)-u(x_{0})\bigr)+q\cdot(y-x_{0}),

so by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product,

u~(y~)u~(x0b)<ε1+qε1=ε1(1+q)=ε.\bigl|\tilde{u}(\tilde{y})-\tilde{u}(x_{0}-b)\bigr|<\varepsilon_{1}+\lVert q\rVert\,\varepsilon_{1}=\varepsilon_{1}\bigl(1+\lVert q\rVert\bigr)=\varepsilon .

Finally let zUbz\in U-b with dE(z,y~)<δd_{E}(z,\tilde{y})<\delta. Then z+bUz+b\in U and dE(z+b,y)=zy~=dE(z,y~)<δd_{E}(z+b,y)=\lVert z-\tilde{y}\rVert=d_{E}(z,\tilde{y})<\delta, so

u(z+b)u(y)+r((z+b)y)+12((z+b)y)(Y((z+b)y)),u(z+b)\le u(y)+r\cdot\bigl((z+b)-y\bigr)+\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl((z+b)-y\bigr)\cdot\Bigl(Y\bigl((z+b)-y\bigr)\Bigr),

and (z+b)y=zy~(z+b)-y=z-\tilde{y}. Adding qz+cq\cdot z+c to both sides and using

u(y)+qz+c=(u(y)+qy~+c)+q(zy~)=u~(y~)+q(zy~),u(y)+q\cdot z+c=\bigl(u(y)+q\cdot\tilde{y}+c\bigr)+q\cdot(z-\tilde{y})=\tilde{u}(\tilde{y})+q\cdot(z-\tilde{y}),

which holds by claims 2 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, we obtain

u~(z)u~(y~)+r~(zy~)+12(zy~)(Y(zy~)).\tilde{u}(z)\le\tilde{u}(\tilde{y})+\tilde{r}\cdot(z-\tilde{y})+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-\tilde{y})\cdot\bigl(Y(z-\tilde{y})\bigr).

By claim 1, applied on the open set UbU-b to the function u~\tilde{u}, the quadruple (x0b,u~(x0b),p+q,X)\bigl(x_{0}-b,\tilde{u}(x_{0}-b),p+q,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for u~\tilde{u}.

For the converse, apply what has just been proved to the function u~\tilde{u} on UbU-b with the vector b-b, the vector q-q and the constant qbcq\cdot b-c. The resulting set is (Ub)(b)=U(U-b)-(-b)=U and the resulting function is

zu~(zb)+(q)z+(qbc)=u(z)+q(zb)+cqz+qbc=u(z),z\mapsto\tilde{u}(z-b)+(-q)\cdot z+\bigl(q\cdot b-c\bigr)=u(z)+q\cdot(z-b)+c-q\cdot z+q\cdot b-c=u(z),

so the conclusion reads that ((x0b)(b),u(x0),(p+q)+(q),X)=(x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl((x_{0}-b)-(-b),\,u(x_{0}),\,(p+q)+(-q),\,X\bigr)=\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu, as required. The argument for approximability from below is identical throughout.

Claim 5. Assume (x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu and let ε\varepsilon be positive. Since WW is open and x0Wx_{0}\in W there is a positive ρ\rho with {z:dE(z,x0)<ρ}W\{z:d_{E}(z,x_{0})<\rho\}\subseteq W. Let ε1\varepsilon_{1} be the smaller of ε\varepsilon and ρ2\tfrac{\rho}{2}, which is positive, and apply claim 1 with ε1\varepsilon_{1} to obtain yUy\in U, rr, YY and a positive δ\delta; let δ\delta' be the smaller of δ\delta and ρ2\tfrac{\rho}{2}. Since dE(y,x0)<ε1ρ2<ρd_{E}(y,x_{0})<\varepsilon_{1}\le\tfrac{\rho}{2}<\rho we have yWy\in W, hence yUy\in U' and u(y)=u(y)u'(y)=u(y); and u(x0)=u(x0)u'(x_{0})=u(x_{0}) because x0Wx_{0}\in W. Therefore the four numerical inequalities hold for uu' with ε1ε\varepsilon_{1}\le\varepsilon in place of ε\varepsilon.

Let zUz\in U' with dE(z,y)<δd_{E}(z,y)<\delta'. By the triangle inequality for dEd_{E},

dE(z,x0)dE(z,y)+dE(y,x0)<ρ2+ρ2=ρ,d_{E}(z,x_{0})\le d_{E}(z,y)+d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\tfrac{\rho}{2}+\tfrac{\rho}{2}=\rho,

so zWz\in W, whence zUz\in U and u(z)=u(z)u'(z)=u(z); and dE(z,y)<δd_{E}(z,y)<\delta, so

u(z)=u(z)u(y)+r(zy)+12(zy)(Y(zy))=u(y)+r(zy)+12(zy)(Y(zy)).u'(z)=u(z)\le u(y)+r\cdot(z-y)+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-y)\cdot\bigl(Y(z-y)\bigr)=u'(y)+r\cdot(z-y)+\tfrac{1}{2}(z-y)\cdot\bigl(Y(z-y)\bigr).

By claim 1, applied on UU' to uu', the quadruple (x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl(x_{0},u'(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for uu'. The argument for approximability from below is identical.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…