· 12,026 chars · 15 deps · depth 19 Reason: First publication of the proof: the quadratic characterisation is obtained by expanding a test function to second order and absorbing the remainder into a multiple of the identity, and conversely by taking the quadratic itself as test function.
The quadratic characterisation is obtained in one direction by expanding a test function to second order and absorbing the remainder into a multiple of the identity, and in the other by taking the quadratic itself as test function; the remaining claims are then routine consequences, since a quadratic test function is defined on all of Euclidean space.
so that φ0(y)=u(y), Dφ0(y)=r and D2φ0(y)=Y. Let φ be the restriction of φ0 to U, which is of class C2 on U with the same gradient and Hessian at points of U, by claims 1 and 3 of Restriction of a Ck Map to an Open Subset. For z∈U with dE(z,y)<δ the hypothesis gives u(z)≤φ(z), hence
u(z)−φ(z)≤0=u(y)−φ(y),
so u−φ has a local maximum at y relative to U. Since Dφ(y)=r and D2φ(y)=Y, the four numerical inequalities of Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data §above are exactly those assumed, and the quadruple is approximable by test data from above for u.
For approximability from below the argument is the same with Y=D2φ(y)−ε′In in the first direction, all the inequalities between values of u and of φ reversed, local minima in place of local maxima, and ∥−ε′In∥=ε′ used in the estimate of dS(n)(Y,X).
Since 21h⋅(Yh)=21h⋅(Xh)+4ε∥h∥2, this gives, for z∈U with dE(z,x0)<δ and h=z−y,
u(z)≤u(y)+r⋅(z−y)+21(z−y)⋅(Y(z−y)),
so claim 1 gives approximability from above. Taking instead Y=X−2εIn and using the lower estimate supplied by the same application of Twice Differentiability at a Point §twice-differentiable gives approximability from below.
Claim 3. Let ε be positive and put ε′=2ε. By the four convergence hypotheses there are N1,N2,N3,N4∈N beyond which the corresponding distances are smaller than ε′; put k=N1+N2+N3+N4, which is at least each of them since natural numbers are nonnegative, so that
As ε was arbitrary, claim 1 shows that (x0,u(x0),p,X) is approximable by test data from above for u. The argument for approximability from below is identical.
Claim 4. Note that x0−b∈U−b and that u~(x0−b)=u(x0)+q⋅(x0−b)+c.
Assume (x0,u(x0),p,X) is approximable by test data from above for u and let ε be positive. The number 1+∥q∥ is positive, so ε1=ε(1+∥q∥)−1 is positive, and ε1≤ε because 1≤1+∥q∥. Apply claim 1 with ε1 to obtain y∈U, r, Y and a positive δ. Put y~=y−b∈U−b and r~=r+q. Then, by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn and the vector space identities,
dE(y~,x0−b)=∥y−x0∥=dE(y,x0)<ε1≤ε,
and ∥r~−(p+q)∥=∥r−p∥<ε, and dS(n)(Y,X)<ε. Moreover
By claim 1, applied on the open set U−b to the function u~, the quadruple (x0−b,u~(x0−b),p+q,X) is approximable by test data from above for u~.
For the converse, apply what has just been proved to the function u~ on U−b with the vector −b, the vector −q and the constant q⋅b−c. The resulting set is (U−b)−(−b)=U and the resulting function is
so the conclusion reads that ((x0−b)−(−b),u(x0),(p+q)+(−q),X)=(x0,u(x0),p,X) is approximable by test data from above for u, as required. The argument for approximability from below is identical throughout.
Claim 5. Assume (x0,u(x0),p,X) is approximable by test data from above for u and let ε be positive. Since W is open and x0∈W there is a positive ρ with {z:dE(z,x0)<ρ}⊆W. Let ε1 be the smaller of ε and 2ρ, which is positive, and apply claim 1 with ε1 to obtain y∈U, r, Y and a positive δ; let δ′ be the smaller of δ and 2ρ. Since dE(y,x0)<ε1≤2ρ<ρ we have y∈W, hence y∈U′ and u′(y)=u(y); and u′(x0)=u(x0) because x0∈W. Therefore the four numerical inequalities hold for u′ with ε1≤ε in place of ε.
Let z∈U′ with dE(z,y)<δ′. By the triangle inequality for dE,
dE(z,x0)≤dE(z,y)+dE(y,x0)<2ρ+2ρ=ρ,
so z∈W, whence z∈U and u′(z)=u(z); and dE(z,y)<δ, so
By claim 1, applied on U′ to u′, the quadruple (x0,u′(x0),p,X) is approximable by test data from above for u′. The argument for approximability from below is identical.