TheoremBase

Uniqueness via heat smoothing and joint continuity, the criterion via uniform convergence of the fields on the cell and their torus Lipschitz bound, and linearity via linearity of the displacement pairing.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) the class of a square-integrable Borel map G:Rd→RdG:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is written [G][G]; by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes (on the probability space (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu), see Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields), [G]=[H][G]=[H] exactly when μ({y:G(y)=H(y)})=1\mu(\{y:G(y)=H(y)\})=1, and a[G]+b[H]=[aG+bH]a[G]+b[H]=[aG+bH] for real a,ba,b. A sequence (μn)(\mu_{n}) converges to μ\mu in (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) exactly when the real sequence (WT(μn,μ))(W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)) converges to 00, by Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space.

Step 0 (a Lipschitz bound in the torus distance). Let u∈Cper1u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}. We show that there is a real Lu≥0L_{u}\ge0 with ∣u(y)−u(x)∣≤Lu dT(x,y)|u(y)-u(x)|\le L_{u}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) for all x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. For each i∈[d]i\in[d] the function ∂iu\partial_{i}u belongs to CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative, so there is a real Mi≥0M_{i}\ge0 with ∣∂iu∣≤Mi|\partial_{i}u|\le M_{i} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §bounded; put Lu=M1+⋯+MdL_{u}=M_{1}+\dots+M_{d}. Let x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, put v=ϖ(y−x)v=\varpi(y-x) and z=x+vz=x+v. By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range, y−z=(y−x)−ϖ(y−x)∈Zdy-z=(y-x)-\varpi(y-x)\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}, so u(y)=u(z)u(y)=u(z) by the periodicity of uu; and ∥v∥=dT(x,y)\lVert v\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance. If v=0v=0, then u(y)=u(x)u(y)=u(x). Otherwise let F:[0,1]→RF:[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}, F(τ)=u(x+τv)F(\tau)=u(x+\tau v). Since uu is of class C1C^{1} on the open set Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous), Derivatives Along a Segment for C^1 Functions on a Euclidean Open Set (claims 2 and 3, with J=[0,1]J=[0,1]) shows that FF is continuous on [0,1][0,1] and differentiable at every τ∈(0,1)\tau\in(0,1) with F′(τ)=∑i=1d∂iu(x+τv) viF'(\tau)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}u(x+\tau v)\,v_{i}. By the mean value theorem there is c∈(0,1)c\in(0,1) with u(z)−u(x)=F′(c)u(z)-u(x)=F'(c), whence ∣u(y)−u(x)∣=∣F′(c)∣≤∑iMi∣vi∣≤Lu∥v∥=Lu dT(x,y)|u(y)-u(x)|=|F'(c)|\le\sum_{i}M_{i}|v_{i}|\le L_{u}\lVert v\rVert=L_{u}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y).

Consequently, if G:Rd→RdG:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} has components G1,…,Gd∈Cper1G_{1},\dots,G_{d}\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, then with LG=LG1+⋯+LGdL_{G}=L_{G_{1}}+\dots+L_{G_{d}},

∥G(y)−G(x)∥≤∑i=1d∣Gi(y)−Gi(x)∣≤LG dT(x,y)(x,y∈Rd).\lVert G(y)-G(x)\rVert\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}|G_{i}(y)-G_{i}(x)|\le L_{G}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)\qquad(x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Claim 1. Let gg and hh be gradient fields of φ\varphi.

Step 1 (agreement at heat-smoothed measures). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), let 0<s≤120<s\le\tfrac12, let SsS_{s} be the heat semigroup at time ss, and put ν=Ssμ\nu=S_{s}\mu; then ν∈PI(Td)⊆P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\subseteq\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §score. By Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §represents, applied to gg and to hh, [g(ν,⋅)]=∇φ(ν)=[h(ν,⋅)][g(\nu,\cdot)]=\nabla\varphi(\nu)=[h(\nu,\cdot)], so the set D={y∈Rd:g(ν,y)≠h(ν,y)}D=\{y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:g(\nu,y)\ne h(\nu,y)\} satisfies ν(D)=0\nu(D)=0. For each ii the functions gi(ν,⋅)g_{i}(\nu,\cdot) and hi(ν,⋅)h_{i}(\nu,\cdot) lie in Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §regular, hence are continuous (C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, clause 1) and periodic; so DD, the union over i∈[d]i\in[d] of the sets where gi(ν,⋅)−hi(ν,⋅)≠0g_{i}(\nu,\cdot)-h_{i}(\nu,\cdot)\ne0, is open (hence Borel), and D+k=DD+k=D for k∈Zdk\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}.

Suppose that DD has a point y0y_{0}. By The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, z0=π(y0)∈Qz_{0}=\pi(y_{0})\in Q and y0−z0∈Zdy_{0}-z_{0}\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}, so z0∈Dz_{0}\in D, and there is r>0r>0 with the open ball B(z0,r)⊆DB(z_{0},r)\subseteq D. Choose a real δ\delta with 0<δ<1−(z0)i0<\delta<1-(z_{0})_{i} for every i∈[d]i\in[d] and δd<r\delta\sqrt{d}<r, let c∈Rdc\in\mathbb{R}^{d} have coordinates ci=(z0)i+δ/2c_{i}=(z_{0})_{i}+\delta/2, and let B′=B(c,δ/2)B'=B(c,\delta/2). For x∈B′x\in B' and i∈[d]i\in[d] one has ∣xi−ci∣≤∥x−c∥<δ/2|x_{i}-c_{i}|\le\lVert x-c\rVert<\delta/2, so 0≤(z0)i<xi<(z0)i+δ<10\le(z_{0})_{i}<x_{i}<(z_{0})_{i}+\delta<1, whence x∈Qx\in Q; and ∥x−z0∥≤∥x−c∥+∥c−z0∥<δ/2+δd/2≤δd<r\lVert x-z_{0}\rVert\le\lVert x-c\rVert+\lVert c-z_{0}\rVert<\delta/2+\delta\sqrt{d}/2\le\delta\sqrt{d}<r, whence x∈Dx\in D. Thus B′⊆D∩QB'\subseteq D\cap Q, and λd(B′)>0\lambda_{d}(B')>0 by Balls Have Positive Lebesgue Measure and Bounded Sets Have Finite Lebesgue Measure (claim 1). Let pp be the positive periodic density of Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §density, so that ν(B′)=∫1B′1Q p dλd=∫1B′ p dλd\nu(B')=\int\mathbf{1}_{B'}\mathbf{1}_{Q}\,p\,d\lambda_{d}=\int\mathbf{1}_{B'}\,p\,d\lambda_{d}. If this integral were 00, then 1B′p=0\mathbf{1}_{B'}p=0 almost everywhere by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing, hence 1B′=0\mathbf{1}_{B'}=0 almost everywhere since p>0p>0 everywhere, hence λd(B′)=∫1B′ dλd=0\lambda_{d}(B')=\int\mathbf{1}_{B'}\,d\lambda_{d}=0 by the same clause, a contradiction. So 0<ν(B′)≤ν(D)=00<\nu(B')\le\nu(D)=0, which is absurd. Therefore DD is empty: g(Ssμ,⋅)=h(Ssμ,⋅)g(S_{s}\mu,\cdot)=h(S_{s}\mu,\cdot) on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Step 2 (general measures). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} put sn=1/(2(n+1))∈(0,12]s_{n}=1/(2(n+1))\in(0,\tfrac12] and μn=Ssnμ\mu_{n}=S_{s_{n}}\mu. By Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §distance, WT(μn,μ)2≤d snW_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\le d\,s_{n}, which tends to 00; so WT(μn,μ)2→0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\to0 by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences (with L=0L=0), and hence WT(μn,μ)=(WT(μn,μ)2)1/2→01/2=0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)=\bigl(W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\bigr)^{1/2}\to0^{1/2}=0 by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity (the first equality by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §exponents, the last by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §values); so (μn)(\mu_{n}) converges to μ\mu. By Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §joint-continuity, applied to gg and to hh with the constant sequence xn=xx_{n}=x, for each i∈[d]i\in[d] the sequences (gi(μn,x))n(g_{i}(\mu_{n},x))_{n} and (hi(μn,x))n(h_{i}(\mu_{n},x))_{n} converge to gi(μ,x)g_{i}(\mu,x) and hi(μ,x)h_{i}(\mu,x) respectively. By Step 1 the two sequences coincide term by term, and a real sequence has only one limit (claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences), so gi(μ,x)=hi(μ,x)g_{i}(\mu,x)=h_{i}(\mu,x). Hence g=hg=h, proving claim 1.

Claim 2. Let φ\varphi and gg be as in the hypotheses of claim 2 of the statement; for μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) we have ∇φ(μ)=[g(μ,⋅)]\nabla\varphi(\mu)=[g(\mu,\cdot)] by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §represents. We verify the three clauses of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test with K=P(Td)\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}).

Step 3 (continuity). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0, and put η=∇φ(μ)\eta=\nabla\varphi(\mu). By Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §represents and Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §differentiable, applied with the value 11 in place of ε\varepsilon, there is θ>0\theta>0 such that ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ)−JT(η,γ)∣≤IT(γ)|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma)|\le\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)} whenever γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) and IT(γ)<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2}. Let δ\delta be the smaller of θ\theta and ε/(∥η∥μ+2)\varepsilon/(\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}+2), and let ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with WT(μ,ν)<δW_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)<\delta. By The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §optimal there is an optimal γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu), so IT(γ)=WT(μ,ν)2<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)^{2}<\theta^{2} by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §optimal. By the triangle inequality and The Torus Displacement Pairing: Linearity, the Cost Bound, and Vanishing of a Field with First-Order Small Pairings §bound,

∣φ(ν)−φ(μ)∣≤∣JT(η,γ)∣+WT(μ,ν)≤(∥η∥μ+1) WT(μ,ν)<(∥η∥μ+1) δ<ε.|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\mu)|\le|\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma)|+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\le(\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}+1)\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)<(\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}+1)\,\delta<\varepsilon .

So φ\varphi is continuous at every μ\mu, which is Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity.

Step 4 (differentiability). For every μ\mu, φ\varphi is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §represents, and ∇φ(μ)=[g(μ,⋅)]∈Tμ\nabla\varphi(\mu)=[g(\mu,\cdot)]\in T_{\mu} by hypothesis. This is Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability.

Step 5 (uniform convergence of the fields). Let (μn)(\mu_{n}) converge to μ\mu in (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}). We show: for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∥g(μn,x)−g(μ,x)∥<ε\lVert g(\mu_{n},x)-g(\mu,x)\rVert<\varepsilon for all n≥Nn\ge N and all x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. Suppose not. Then there is ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that for every NN there are n≥Nn\ge N and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∥g(μn,x)−g(μ,x)∥≥ε\lVert g(\mu_{n},x)-g(\mu,x)\rVert\ge\varepsilon. Choosing successively N=0N=0 and then N=nk−1+1N=n_{k-1}+1, we obtain a strictly increasing sequence (nk)k∈N(n_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N} and points xkx_{k} with ∥g(μnk,xk)−g(μ,xk)∥≥ε\lVert g(\mu_{n_{k}},x_{k})-g(\mu,x_{k})\rVert\ge\varepsilon. Put yk=π(xk)y_{k}=\pi(x_{k}); by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, yk∈Qy_{k}\in Q and xk−yk∈Zdx_{k}-y_{k}\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}, so by periodicity of the components (Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §regular) ∥g(μnk,yk)−g(μ,yk)∥≥ε\lVert g(\mu_{n_{k}},y_{k})-g(\mu,y_{k})\rVert\ge\varepsilon. Every point of QQ has coordinates in [0,1)[0,1), hence norm at most d\sqrt{d}, so QQ is bounded; by Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem in Euclidean Space there are y∗∈Rdy^{*}\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and a strictly increasing sequence (kj)j∈N(k_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} with ykj→y∗y_{k_{j}}\to y^{*}. The sequence (nkj)j(n_{k_{j}})_{j} is strictly increasing, so (μnkj)j(\mu_{n_{k_{j}}})_{j} converges to μ\mu by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit. By Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §joint-continuity, applied to the sequences (μnkj)j(\mu_{n_{k_{j}}})_{j} and (ykj)j(y_{k_{j}})_{j}, and again to the constant sequence (μ)j(\mu)_{j} and (ykj)j(y_{k_{j}})_{j}, for each i∈[d]i\in[d] both gi(μnkj,ykj)g_{i}(\mu_{n_{k_{j}}},y_{k_{j}}) and gi(μ,ykj)g_{i}(\mu,y_{k_{j}}) converge to gi(μ,y∗)g_{i}(\mu,y^{*}) as j→∞j\to\infty. Hence ∥g(μnkj,ykj)−g(μ,ykj)∥≤∑i∣gi(μnkj,ykj)−gi(μ,ykj)∣\lVert g(\mu_{n_{k_{j}}},y_{k_{j}})-g(\mu,y_{k_{j}})\rVert\le\sum_{i}|g_{i}(\mu_{n_{k_{j}}},y_{k_{j}})-g_{i}(\mu,y_{k_{j}})|, which tends to 00 by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences and claim 4 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, contradicting the lower bound ε\varepsilon.

Step 6 (gradient continuity). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), let (μn)(\mu_{n}) be a sequence in P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), and let γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) with IT(γn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0. Since WT(μn,μ)2≤IT(γn)W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\le I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance, (μn)(\mu_{n}) converges to μ\mu. Use the representatives g(μn,⋅)g(\mu_{n},\cdot) and g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot), and let AnA_{n} denote the nnth term of the sequence in Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity. By Step 0 there is L≥0L\ge0 with ∥g(μ,y)−g(μ,x)∥≤L dT(x,y)\lVert g(\mu,y)-g(\mu,x)\rVert\le L\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) for all x,yx,y. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. First choose N1N_{1} as in Step 5 for this ε\varepsilon; then, since IT(γn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0, choose N2N_{2} with L2IT(γn)<ε2L^{2}I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})<\varepsilon^{2} for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}. For nn at least the larger of N1N_{1} and N2N_{2} and w∈Rd+dw\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, with x=pr1(w)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w) and y=pr2(w)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w), the second inequality of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (applied to g(μn,x)−g(μ,y)g(\mu_{n},x)-g(\mu,y) and g(μn,x)−g(μ,x)g(\mu_{n},x)-g(\mu,x)) gives

∥g(μn,x)−g(μ,y)∥2≤2∥g(μn,x)−g(μ,x)∥2+2∥g(μ,x)−g(μ,y)∥2≤2ε2+2L2dT(x,y)2.\lVert g(\mu_{n},x)-g(\mu,y)\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert g(\mu_{n},x)-g(\mu,x)\rVert^{2}+2\lVert g(\mu,x)-g(\mu,y)\rVert^{2}\le2\varepsilon^{2}+2L^{2}d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)^{2}.

Integrating against the probability measure γn\gamma_{n}, by linearity and monotonicity of the integral (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral) and Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost, 0≤An≤2ε2+2L2IT(γn)<4ε20\le A_{n}\le2\varepsilon^{2}+2L^{2}I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})<4\varepsilon^{2}. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, An→0A_{n}\to0, which is Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity.

Step 7 (conclusion of claim 2). By Steps 3, 4 and 6, φ\varphi is an intrinsic test function on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), and gg is a gradient field of φ\varphi; so φ\varphi is a Laplacian test function by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test.

Claim 3. Let χ=aφ+bψ\chi=a\varphi+b\psi, and put c=∣a∣+∣b∣+1c=|a|+|b|+1.

Step 8 (continuity). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity for φ\varphi and ψ\psi there are δ1,δ2>0\delta_{1},\delta_{2}>0 with ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ)∣<ε/c|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\mu)|<\varepsilon/c when WT(μ,ν)<δ1W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)<\delta_{1} and ∣ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)∣<ε/c|\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)|<\varepsilon/c when WT(μ,ν)<δ2W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)<\delta_{2}. For WT(μ,ν)W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu) below the smaller of δ1,δ2\delta_{1},\delta_{2}, ∣χ(ν)−χ(μ)∣≤∣a∣ ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ)∣+∣b∣ ∣ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)∣≤(∣a∣+∣b∣)ε/c<ε|\chi(\nu)-\chi(\mu)|\le|a|\,|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\mu)|+|b|\,|\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)|\le(|a|+|b|)\varepsilon/c<\varepsilon. So χ\chi is continuous.

Step 9 (differentiability). Let μ∈K\mu\in\mathcal{K} and put η=a∇φ(μ)+b∇ψ(μ)∈L2(μ;Rd)\eta=a\nabla\varphi(\mu)+b\nabla\psi(\mu)\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}). Let ε>0\varepsilon>0; by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability and Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §differentiable, applied with ε/c\varepsilon/c, there are θ1,θ2>0\theta_{1},\theta_{2}>0 for φ\varphi and ψ\psi; let θ\theta be the smaller. For ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) with IT(γ)<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2}, The Torus Displacement Pairing: Linearity, the Cost Bound, and Vanishing of a Field with First-Order Small Pairings §linear gives

χ(ν)−χ(μ)−JT(η,γ)=a(φ(ν)−φ(μ)−JT(∇φ(μ),γ))+b(ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)−JT(∇ψ(μ),γ)),\chi(\nu)-\chi(\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma)=a\bigl(\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\nabla\varphi(\mu),\gamma)\bigr)+b\bigl(\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\nabla\psi(\mu),\gamma)\bigr),

whose absolute value is at most (∣a∣+∣b∣)(ε/c)IT(γ)≤εIT(γ)(|a|+|b|)(\varepsilon/c)\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}. Hence χ\chi is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient η\eta, so ∇χ(μ)=a∇φ(μ)+b∇ψ(μ)\nabla\chi(\mu)=a\nabla\varphi(\mu)+b\nabla\psi(\mu) by the uniqueness in Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient; and ∇χ(μ)∈Tμ\nabla\chi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} because ∇φ(μ),∇ψ(μ)∈Tμ\nabla\varphi(\mu),\nabla\psi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} and TμT_{\mu} is a linear subspace by The Torus Tangent Space: Linearity of the Periodic Calculus, Closed Subspace, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §subspace.

Step 10 (gradient continuity). Let μ\mu, (μn)(\mu_{n}) in K\mathcal{K} and γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) with IT(γn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0. Choose Borel representatives Gn,G,Hn,HG_{n},G,H_{n},H of ∇φ(μn),∇φ(μ),∇ψ(μn),∇ψ(μ)\nabla\varphi(\mu_{n}),\nabla\varphi(\mu),\nabla\psi(\mu_{n}),\nabla\psi(\mu); then aGn+bHnaG_{n}+bH_{n} and aG+bHaG+bH represent ∇χ(μn)\nabla\chi(\mu_{n}) and ∇χ(μ)\nabla\chi(\mu) by Step 9. For w∈Rd+dw\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, with x=pr1(w)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w), y=pr2(w)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w), the first inequality of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (applied to a(Gn(x)−G(y))a(G_{n}(x)-G(y)) and −b(Hn(x)−H(y))-b(H_{n}(x)-H(y))) gives

∥(aGn+bHn)(x)−(aG+bH)(y)∥2≤2a2∥Gn(x)−G(y)∥2+2b2∥Hn(x)−H(y)∥2.\lVert(aG_{n}+bH_{n})(x)-(aG+bH)(y)\rVert^{2}\le2a^{2}\lVert G_{n}(x)-G(y)\rVert^{2}+2b^{2}\lVert H_{n}(x)-H(y)\rVert^{2}.

Integrating against γn\gamma_{n} (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral), the nnth term for χ\chi in Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity lies between 00 and 2a22a^{2} times the nnth term for φ\varphi plus 2b22b^{2} times the nnth term for ψ\psi; the latter two sequences converge to 00 by that clause for φ\varphi and ψ\psi, so, by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences and the squeeze claim (claim 2) of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, the former does too. With Steps 8 and 9, χ\chi is an intrinsic test function on K\mathcal{K} with ∇χ(μ)=a∇φ(μ)+b∇ψ(μ)\nabla\chi(\mu)=a\nabla\varphi(\mu)+b\nabla\psi(\mu).

Step 11 (the Laplacian case). Let φ,ψ\varphi,\psi be Laplacian test functions with gradient fields g,hg,h. By Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test they are intrinsic test functions on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), so by Steps 8 to 10 with K=P(Td)\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), χ\chi is one as well. We check that k=ag+bhk=ag+bh is a gradient field of χ\chi. Clause (a): ki(μ,⋅)=a gi(μ,⋅)+b hi(μ,⋅)∈Cper1k_{i}(\mu,\cdot)=a\,g_{i}(\mu,\cdot)+b\,h_{i}(\mu,\cdot)\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §algebra. Clause (b): χ\chi is differentiable along couplings at every μ\mu with ∇χ(μ)=a[g(μ,⋅)]+b[h(μ,⋅)]=[k(μ,⋅)]\nabla\chi(\mu)=a[g(\mu,\cdot)]+b[h(\mu,\cdot)]=[k(\mu,\cdot)], by Step 9 and Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §represents for gg and hh. Clause (c): by claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, ∂jki(μ,x)=a ∂jgi(μ,x)+b ∂jhi(μ,x)\partial_{j}k_{i}(\mu,x)=a\,\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x)+b\,\partial_{j}h_{i}(\mu,x), so if μn→μ\mu_{n}\to\mu and xn→xx_{n}\to x, then ki(μn,xn)k_{i}(\mu_{n},x_{n}) and ∂jki(μn,xn)\partial_{j}k_{i}(\mu_{n},x_{n}) are the corresponding linear combinations of sequences that converge by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §joint-continuity for gg and hh, and so converge to ki(μ,x)k_{i}(\mu,x) and ∂jki(μ,x)\partial_{j}k_{i}(\mu,x). Hence χ\chi is a Laplacian test function with gradient field ag+bhag+bh by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test. This proves claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…