TheoremBase

Each clause is reduced to the definition of a null set through monotonicity and subadditivity of the measure; the countable case uses the given witnesses and the vanishing of a sum of zeros, and the almost-everywhere clauses compare complements in X.

Proof

Every member of F\mathcal{F} is a subset of XX, as FβŠ†P(X)\mathcal{F}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(X) by Οƒ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i).

Proof of (i). If ΞΌ(B)=0\mu(B)=0, then BβŠ†XB\subseteq X, BβŠ†BB\subseteq B and B∈FB\in\mathcal{F}, so BB is ΞΌ\mu-null by Null Set of a Measure (i), with BB itself as the witnessing set. Conversely, let BB be ΞΌ\mu-null; by Null Set of a Measure (i) there is C∈FC\in\mathcal{F} with BβŠ†CB\subseteq C and ΞΌ(C)=0\mu(C)=0. By Basic Properties of a Measure (iii), ΞΌ(B)≀μ(C)=0\mu(B)\le\mu(C)=0, and ΞΌ(B)∈[0,∞]\mu(B)\in[0,\infty], so ΞΌ(B)=0\mu(B)=0 (Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (i)).

Proof of (ii). By Null Set of a Measure (i) there is C∈FC\in\mathcal{F} with MβŠ†CM\subseteq C and ΞΌ(C)=0\mu(C)=0. Then NβŠ†CN\subseteq C, and NβŠ†XN\subseteq X by hypothesis, so NN is ΞΌ\mu-null by Null Set of a Measure (i).

Proof of (iii). By Null Set of a Measure (i) there are B,C∈FB,C\in\mathcal{F} with NβŠ†BN\subseteq B, MβŠ†CM\subseteq C and ΞΌ(B)=ΞΌ(C)=0\mu(B)=\mu(C)=0. Then BβˆͺC∈FB\cup C\in\mathcal{F} by Closure Properties of Οƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of Οƒ-Algebras, and the Generated Οƒ-Algebra (vii), NβˆͺMβŠ†BβˆͺCN\cup M\subseteq B\cup C and NβˆͺMβŠ†XN\cup M\subseteq X. By Basic Properties of a Measure (vii), ΞΌ(BβˆͺC)≀μ(B)+ΞΌ(C)=0+0\mu(B\cup C)\le\mu(B)+\mu(C)=0+0, and 0+0=00+0=0 in [0,∞][0,\infty], as 00 is a neutral element of the sum on [0,∞][0,\infty] by Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (i). Hence ΞΌ(BβˆͺC)=0\mu(B\cup C)=0 (Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (i)), and NβˆͺMN\cup M is ΞΌ\mu-null by Null Set of a Measure (i), with BβˆͺCB\cup C as the witnessing set.

Proof of (iv). Put B=⋃m∈NBmB=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}B_{m}; then B∈FB\in\mathcal{F} by Οƒ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i). By Basic Properties of a Measure (vi), ΞΌ(B)β‰€βˆ‘m∈NΞΌ(Bm)\mu(B)\le\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\mu(B_{m}), the sum being that of Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii). Every term of the sequence m↦μ(Bm)m\mapsto\mu(B_{m}) is 00, so its sum is 00 (Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (iv)). Hence ΞΌ(B)≀0\mu(B)\le0, and ΞΌ(B)=0\mu(B)=0 (Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (i)).

Proof of (v). Let (Bm)(B_{m}) and (Nm)(N_{m}) be as stated, and put B=⋃m∈NBmB=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}B_{m}; then B∈FB\in\mathcal{F} and ΞΌ(B)=0\mu(B)=0 by (iv). The union N=⋃m∈NNmN=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}N_{m} is a set by The Union and Product of a Family of Sets Indexed by a Set, and the Intersection of a Family with an Inhabited Index Class, Are Sets (i). If u∈Nu\in N, then by Indexed Families of Sets and Their Union, Intersection and Product (ii) there is m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with u∈Nmu\in N_{m}; then u∈Xu\in X, as Nm∈P(X)N_{m}\in\mathcal{P}(X), and u∈Bmu\in B_{m}, as NmβŠ†BmN_{m}\subseteq B_{m}, so u∈Bu\in B by Indexed Families of Sets and Their Union, Intersection and Product (ii). Thus NβŠ†XN\subseteq X and NβŠ†BN\subseteq B, with B∈FB\in\mathcal{F} and ΞΌ(B)=0\mu(B)=0, so NN is ΞΌ\mu-null by Null Set of a Measure (i). No choice is made here: the witnessing sets are the given terms BmB_{m}, and the single witness for NN is their union.

Proof of (vi). By A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i), Xβˆ–QX\setminus Q is ΞΌ\mu-null. Let u∈Xβˆ–Ru\in X\setminus R, so u∈Xu\in X and uβˆ‰Ru\notin R. If u∈Qu\in Q, then u∈X∩QβŠ†Ru\in X\cap Q\subseteq R, which is false; so uβˆ‰Qu\notin Q and u∈Xβˆ–Qu\in X\setminus Q. Thus Xβˆ–RβŠ†Xβˆ–QβŠ†XX\setminus R\subseteq X\setminus Q\subseteq X, and Xβˆ–RX\setminus R is a set, being a subclass of the set XX (Subclasses of Sets Are Sets, the Union and Power Set of a Set Exist Uniquely, Binary Unions of Sets Are Sets, and the Universal Class Is Proper (i)). By (ii), Xβˆ–RX\setminus R is ΞΌ\mu-null, that is, RR holds ΞΌ\mu-a.e. by A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i).

Proof of (vii). By A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i), Xβˆ–QX\setminus Q and Xβˆ–RX\setminus R are ΞΌ\mu-null, and they are subsets of XX; so (Xβˆ–Q)βˆͺ(Xβˆ–R)(X\setminus Q)\cup(X\setminus R) is ΞΌ\mu-null by (iii). If u∈Xβˆ–(Q∩R)u\in X\setminus(Q\cap R), then u∈Xu\in X and uβˆ‰Q∩Ru\notin Q\cap R, so uβˆ‰Qu\notin Q or uβˆ‰Ru\notin R, that is, u∈Xβˆ–Qu\in X\setminus Q or u∈Xβˆ–Ru\in X\setminus R. Hence Xβˆ–(Q∩R)βŠ†(Xβˆ–Q)βˆͺ(Xβˆ–R)βŠ†XX\setminus(Q\cap R)\subseteq(X\setminus Q)\cup(X\setminus R)\subseteq X, and Xβˆ–(Q∩R)X\setminus(Q\cap R) is a set, being a subclass of the set XX (Subclasses of Sets Are Sets, the Union and Power Set of a Set Exist Uniquely, Binary Unions of Sets Are Sets, and the Universal Class Is Proper (i)); so Xβˆ–(Q∩R)X\setminus(Q\cap R) is ΞΌ\mu-null by (ii), and Q∩RQ\cap R holds ΞΌ\mu-a.e. by A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…