TheoremBase

Membership from Talagrand and the extension distance bound. Fix epsilon; choose in order a radius R, a partition nearly attaining the head entropy, a partition into small cubes plus the exterior of the ball, and their common refinement; pull back to X. On each cell, Talagrand for the Gaussian-head/piece-tail measure gives a cheap tail coupling, glued with the piece and an independent copy of the head piece; the noise cost splits into head and tail parts. Mixing and the images claim give the bound up to (5+2kappa)epsilon; convergence from the heads claim.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. The setting A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation is in force, so the reference measure is ρ=γc\rho=\gamma_{c} and the setting Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation is in force through A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §background; with the given κ\kappa, the hypotheses of Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space on cc, κ\kappa and aa hold, so that theorem applies to every member of P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) of finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. Integrals of nonnegative measurable functions are added, scaled and compared by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, integrals against image measures are computed by the change of variables formula of claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and image measures are those of claim 1 of that lemma; these tools are used without further mention. Throughout, n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} is fixed, [n]={1,…,n}[n]=\{1,\dots,n\}, and for x∈Xx\in X we write xk=⟨x,ek⟩x_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle; SN(x)=∑k=1Nak−1xk2S_{N}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{N}a_{k}^{-1}x_{k}^{2} is the partial sum of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums, and nan_{a}, DaD_{a} and cac_{a} are those of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel and The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs, so that ca(x,y)=na(y−x)c_{a}(x,y)=n_{a}(y-x).

Step 1 (Membership; claim 1). By Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space §connected, μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}. Hence μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments, and then μ~n=(rn)#μ∈P2(Rn)\tilde{\mu}_{n}=(r_{n})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head, which also shows that rnr_{n} is continuous, hence Borel. Moreover γ~n∈P2(Rn)\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §head-law. Applying Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance with λ=μ~n\lambda=\tilde{\mu}_{n} and λ′=γ~n\lambda'=\tilde{\gamma}_{n} gives En(μ~n)∈PρaE_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}. Since μ\mu and En(μ~n)E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}) both belong to Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, the pair (μ,En(μ~n))(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})) is noise-connected by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected, so Wa(μ,En(μ~n))W_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})) is defined by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance, and Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2≤Ia(π)W_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))^{2}\le I^{a}(\pi) for every π∈Πa(μ,En(μ~n))\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})). This proves claim 1.

Step 2 (Coordinate identities). Let Zn={w∈X:wk=0 for every k∈[n]}Z_{n}=\{w\in X:w_{k}=0\text{ for every }k\in[n]\}. It is a linear subspace of XX, and it is Borel, being the intersection of the preimages of the closed set {0}\{0\} under the finitely many coordinate functions x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k}, k∈[n]k\in[n], which are continuous by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. We record six facts.

(a) For w∈Xw\in X, Pnw=pn∗(pn(w))=∑j=1nwjejP_{n}w=p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(w))=\sum_{j=1}^{n}w_{j}e_{j} by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, so by orthonormality (Pnw)k=wk(P_{n}w)_{k}=w_{k} for k∈[n]k\in[n] and (Pnw)k=0(P_{n}w)_{k}=0 for k>nk>n; hence (Qnw)k=0(Q_{n}w)_{k}=0 for k∈[n]k\in[n] and (Qnw)k=wk(Q_{n}w)_{k}=w_{k} for k>nk>n. Consequently Qnw∈ZnQ_{n}w\in Z_{n} for every w∈Xw\in X; if w∈Znw\in Z_{n} then pn(w)=0p_{n}(w)=0, so Pnw=0P_{n}w=0 and Qnw=wQ_{n}w=w; and Qn∘Qn=QnQ_{n}\circ Q_{n}=Q_{n}. Likewise, for ζ∈Rn\zeta\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the vector pn∗(ζ)=∑j=1nζjejp_{n}^{*}(\zeta)=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\zeta_{j}e_{j} has kk-th coordinate ζk\zeta_{k} for k∈[n]k\in[n] and 00 for k>nk>n.

(b) For u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and w∈Xw\in X, Ψn(u,w)=pn∗(η)+w\Psi_{n}(u,w)=p_{n}^{*}(\eta)+w with η=(a11/2u1,…,an1/2un)\eta=(a_{1}^{1/2}u_{1},\dots,a_{n}^{1/2}u_{n}). The maps pnp_{n}, pn∗p_{n}^{*}, PnP_{n} and QnQ_{n} are linear, and pn(pn∗(η))=ηp_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(\eta))=\eta by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, so Qnpn∗(η)=pn∗(η)−pn∗(pn(pn∗(η)))=0Q_{n}p_{n}^{*}(\eta)=p_{n}^{*}(\eta)-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(\eta)))=0. Hence QnΨn(u,w)=QnwQ_{n}\Psi_{n}(u,w)=Q_{n}w. If moreover w∈Znw\in Z_{n}, then QnΨn(u,w)=wQ_{n}\Psi_{n}(u,w)=w by (a), and pn(Ψn(u,w))=η+pn(w)=ηp_{n}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))=\eta+p_{n}(w)=\eta, so that rn(Ψn(u,w))=(a1−1/2η1,…,an−1/2ηn)=ur_{n}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))=(a_{1}^{-1/2}\eta_{1},\dots,a_{n}^{-1/2}\eta_{n})=u by the formula for rnr_{n} in Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space.

(c) For x∈Xx\in X, ak1/2(rn(x))k=ak1/2ak−1/2xk=xka_{k}^{1/2}(r_{n}(x))_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{-1/2}x_{k}=x_{k} for k∈[n]k\in[n], so Ψn(rn(x),Qnx)=pn∗(pn(x))+Qnx=Pnx+Qnx=x\Psi_{n}(r_{n}(x),Q_{n}x)=p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))+Q_{n}x=P_{n}x+Q_{n}x=x.

(d) Let z∈Xaz\in X^{a}. By (a), SN(Qnz)=∑n<k≤Nak−1zk2≤SN(z)≤∣z∣a2S_{N}(Q_{n}z)=\sum_{n<k\le N}a_{k}^{-1}z_{k}^{2}\le S_{N}(z)\le|z|_{a}^{2} for every N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, the last inequality by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums. By the same claim, Qnz∈XaQ_{n}z\in X^{a} and ∣Qnz∣a2=sup⁡NSN(Qnz)≤∣z∣a2|Q_{n}z|_{a}^{2}=\sup_{N}S_{N}(Q_{n}z)\le|z|_{a}^{2}.

(e) Let x∈Xx\in X, v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and w′∈Znw'\in Z_{n} be such that t=w′−Qnx∈Xat=w'-Q_{n}x\in X^{a}, and let y=Ψn(v,w′)y=\Psi_{n}(v,w'). Then y−x∈Xay-x\in X^{a} and ∣y−x∣a2=∥v−rn(x)∥2+∣t∣a2|y-x|_{a}^{2}=\lVert v-r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}+|t|_{a}^{2}; that is, (x,y)∈Da(x,y)\in D_{a} and ca(x,y)=∥v−rn(x)∥2+ca(Qnx,w′)c_{a}(x,y)=\lVert v-r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}+c_{a}(Q_{n}x,w'). Indeed, by (b) and (c), y−x=pn∗(η−pn(x))+ty-x=p_{n}^{*}(\eta-p_{n}(x))+t with ηk=ak1/2vk\eta_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}v_{k}, and t∈Znt\in Z_{n} because ZnZ_{n} is a linear subspace containing w′w' and QnxQ_{n}x. By (a) and (c), the kk-th coordinate of y−xy-x is ak1/2(vk−(rn(x))k)a_{k}^{1/2}(v_{k}-(r_{n}(x))_{k}) for k∈[n]k\in[n] and tkt_{k} for k>nk>n. Hence for N≥nN\ge n, SN(y−x)=∥v−rn(x)∥2+SN(t)S_{N}(y-x)=\lVert v-r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}+S_{N}(t), since SN(t)S_{N}(t) has no contribution from k∈[n]k\in[n]. By The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums, SN(t)≤∣t∣a2S_{N}(t)\le|t|_{a}^{2} with sup⁡NSN(t)=∣t∣a2\sup_{N}S_{N}(t)=|t|_{a}^{2}, and (SN(y−x))N(S_{N}(y-x))_{N} is nondecreasing, so it is bounded above, y−x∈Xay-x\in X^{a}, and ∣y−x∣a2=sup⁡N≥nSN(y−x)=∥v−rn(x)∥2+∣t∣a2|y-x|_{a}^{2}=\sup_{N\ge n}S_{N}(y-x)=\lVert v-r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}+|t|_{a}^{2}.

(f) τn(Zn)=γc(Qn−1(Zn))=γc(X)=1\tau_{n}(Z_{n})=\gamma_{c}(Q_{n}^{-1}(Z_{n}))=\gamma_{c}(X)=1 by (a) and A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails.

Step 3 (The Gaussian reference measure on head cells). We show that for all C∈B(Rn)C\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X),

γc(rn−1(C)∩Qn−1(B))=γ~n(C) τn(B).\gamma_{c}\bigl(r_{n}^{-1}(C)\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(B)\bigr)=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C)\,\tau_{n}(B).

By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §reconstruction and The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, γc=(Ψn)#(γ~n⊗τn)\gamma_{c}=(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n}), with Ψn\Psi_{n} measurable for B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel. Let E=rn−1(C)∩Qn−1(B)E=r_{n}^{-1}(C)\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(B), a Borel set as rnr_{n} and QnQ_{n} are Borel. By (b) of Step 2, a point (u,w)(u,w) with w∈Znw\in Z_{n} lies in Ψn−1(E)\Psi_{n}^{-1}(E) if and only if u∈Cu\in C and w∈Bw\in B; so Ψn−1(E)∩(Rn×Zn)=C×(B∩Zn)\Psi_{n}^{-1}(E)\cap(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times Z_{n})=C\times(B\cap Z_{n}). The rectangle Rn×(X∖Zn)\mathbb{R}^{n}\times(X\setminus Z_{n}) has (γ~n⊗τn)(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})-measure γ~n(Rn) τn(X∖Zn)=0\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\,\tau_{n}(X\setminus Z_{n})=0 by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure and (f) of Step 2. Hence, by additivity of the measure over Ψn−1(E)∩(Rn×Zn)\Psi_{n}^{-1}(E)\cap(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times Z_{n}) and Ψn−1(E)∖(Rn×Zn)\Psi_{n}^{-1}(E)\setminus(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times Z_{n}), the latter having measure 00 by monotonicity,

γc(E)=(γ~n⊗τn)(C×(B∩Zn))=γ~n(C) τn(B∩Zn)=γ~n(C) τn(B),\gamma_{c}(E)=(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})\bigl(C\times(B\cap Z_{n})\bigr)=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C)\,\tau_{n}(B\cap Z_{n})=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C)\,\tau_{n}(B),

using Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure and τn(B∖Zn)=0\tau_{n}(B\setminus Z_{n})=0. With B=XB=X this gives γc(rn−1(C))=γ~n(C)\gamma_{c}(r_{n}^{-1}(C))=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C).

Step 4 (The order of choices). Fix a positive real number ε\varepsilon. We make the following choices, in this order; all later constructions involve no further choice of numbers.

(i) A radius RR. For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} let fm(u)=∥u∥21{∥u∥≤m}f_{m}(u)=\lVert u\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{\{\lVert u\rVert\le m\}} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; these are nonnegative Borel functions, nondecreasing in mm, with pointwise supremum ∥u∥2\lVert u\rVert^{2}. By Monotone Convergence Theorem, ∫fm dμ~n\int f_{m}\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n} increases to the second moment M2(μ~n)=∫∥u∥2 μ~n(du)M_{2}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})=\int\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}_{n}(du) of The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment, which is finite by Step 1 and The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space. Choose R=m∈NR=m\in\mathbb{N} with ∫fm dμ~n>M2(μ~n)−ε\int f_{m}\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n}>M_{2}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})-\varepsilon; since ∥u∥2=fR(u)+∥u∥21U(u)\lVert u\rVert^{2}=f_{R}(u)+\lVert u\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{U}(u) with U={u∈Rn:∥u∥>R}U=\{u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\lVert u\rVert>R\}, we get

∫Rn∥u∥21U(u) μ~n(du)<ε.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert u\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{U}(u)\,\tilde{\mu}_{n}(du)<\varepsilon .

(ii) A partition C′\mathcal{C}'. By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §heads (with m=nm=n), μ~n\tilde{\mu}_{n} has finite relative entropy with respect to γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n}. By Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §approximation, applied on (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})) with ν=μ~n\nu=\tilde{\mu}_{n} and γ=γ~n\gamma=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}, choose a finite measurable partition C′\mathcal{C}' of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with hC′(μ~n ∣ γ~n)>H(μ~n ∣ γ~n)−εh_{\mathcal{C}'}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})>H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})-\varepsilon, the partition entropy being defined by Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §chain-rule.

(iii) A partition C′′\mathcal{C}''. Let δ=(ε/n)1/2\delta=(\varepsilon/n)^{1/2} and choose N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with R≤NδR\le N\delta. For j∈{−N,…,N}nj\in\{-N,\dots,N\}^{n} let Kj={u∈Rn:jkδ≤uk<(jk+1)δ for k∈[n]}∩{u:∥u∥≤R}K_{j}=\{u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:j_{k}\delta\le u_{k}<(j_{k}+1)\delta\text{ for }k\in[n]\}\cap\{u:\lVert u\rVert\le R\}. Each KjK_{j} is Borel, being a finite intersection of closed and open sets (the coordinate functions and ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert are continuous). The sets KjK_{j} are pairwise disjoint, because jk=⌊uk/δ⌋j_{k}=\lfloor u_{k}/\delta\rfloor for u∈Kju\in K_{j}, and they cover {∥u∥≤R}\{\lVert u\rVert\le R\}: if ∥u∥≤R\lVert u\rVert\le R then ∣uk∣≤∥u∥≤Nδ|u_{k}|\le\lVert u\rVert\le N\delta by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate, so jk=⌊uk/δ⌋∈{−N,…,N}j_{k}=\lfloor u_{k}/\delta\rfloor\in\{-N,\dots,N\}. For u,u′∈Kju,u'\in K_{j}, ∣uk−uk′∣<δ|u_{k}-u'_{k}|<\delta for each kk, so ∥u−u′∥2<nδ2=ε\lVert u-u'\rVert^{2}<n\delta^{2}=\varepsilon. Thus C′′\mathcal{C}'', consisting of the sets KjK_{j} and the open set UU, is a finite measurable partition of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} each of whose cells either is contained in UU or has ∥u−u′∥2<ε\lVert u-u'\rVert^{2}<\varepsilon for all of its points u,u′u,u'.

(iv) The partition C\mathcal{C}. Let C=(C1,…,Cm)\mathcal{C}=(C_{1},\dots,C_{m}) be an enumeration of the sets C′∩C′′C'\cap C'' with C′C' a cell of C′\mathcal{C}' and C′′C'' a cell of C′′\mathcal{C}''. These are Borel, pairwise disjoint, and cover Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, so C\mathcal{C} is a finite measurable partition of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} which refines both C′\mathcal{C}' and C′′\mathcal{C}''. By Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §refinement and (ii),

hC(μ~n ∣ γ~n)≥hC′(μ~n ∣ γ~n)>H(μ~n ∣ γ~n)−ε.h_{\mathcal{C}}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})\ge h_{\mathcal{C}'}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})>H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})-\varepsilon .

A nonempty cell CiC_{i} lies in exactly one cell of C′′\mathcal{C}''; we call ii small if that cell is some KjK_{j}, so that ∥u−u′∥2<ε\lVert u-u'\rVert^{2}<\varepsilon for u,u′∈Ciu,u'\in C_{i}, and large if it is UU, so that Ci⊆UC_{i}\subseteq U.

Step 5 (Pulling the partition back to XX). Let Ai=rn−1(Ci)A_{i}=r_{n}^{-1}(C_{i}) for i∈[m]i\in[m]. Since rnr_{n} is Borel and preimages preserve disjointness and unions, A=(A1,…,Am)\mathcal{A}=(A_{1},\dots,A_{m}) is a finite measurable partition of XX. Let pi=μ(Ai)=μ~n(Ci)p_{i}=\mu(A_{i})=\tilde{\mu}_{n}(C_{i}) and qi=γc(Ai)=γ~n(Ci)q_{i}=\gamma_{c}(A_{i})=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C_{i}), the latter by Step 3, and let J={i∈[m]:0<pi}J=\{i\in[m]:0<p_{i}\}; for i∈Ji\in J the cell CiC_{i} is nonempty and 0<qi0<q_{i} by Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §chain-rule. The numbers pip_{i}, qiq_{i} being the same for (μ,γc,A)(\mu,\gamma_{c},\mathcal{A}) and for (μ~n,γ~n,C)(\tilde{\mu}_{n},\tilde{\gamma}_{n},\mathcal{C}), The Partition Entropy of a Probability Measure Relative to Another over a Finite Measurable Partition §partition-entropy gives hA(μ ∣ γc)=hC(μ~n ∣ γ~n)h_{\mathcal{A}}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})=h_{\mathcal{C}}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n}).

For i∈Ji\in J let μi=μ(⋅ ∣ Ai)\mu_{i}=\mu(\cdot\,|\,A_{i}) and γi=γc(⋅ ∣ Ai)\gamma_{i}=\gamma_{c}(\cdot\,|\,A_{i}) be the conditioned probability measures, which are the pieces of μ\mu and of γc\gamma_{c} on AiA_{i} in Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies. For B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X), Step 3 gives γi(Qn−1(B))=γc(Ai∩Qn−1(B))/qi=γ~n(Ci)τn(B)/γ~n(Ci)=τn(B)\gamma_{i}(Q_{n}^{-1}(B))=\gamma_{c}(A_{i}\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(B))/q_{i}=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C_{i})\tau_{n}(B)/\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(C_{i})=\tau_{n}(B); that is, (Qn)#γi=τn(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{i}=\tau_{n}. Let σi=(Qn)#μi∈P(X)\sigma_{i}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\mu_{i}\in\mathcal{P}(X). Applying Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §images on (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) with ν=μ\nu=\mu, γ=γc\gamma=\gamma_{c}, the partition A\mathcal{A} and the Borel map R=QnR=Q_{n} (Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity), each σi\sigma_{i}, i∈Ji\in J, has finite relative entropy with respect to τn\tau_{n} and

∑i∈Jpi H(σi ∣ τn)≤H(μ ∣ γc)−hA(μ ∣ γc)=H(μ ∣ γc)−hC(μ~n ∣ γ~n)<H(μ ∣ γc)−H(μ~n ∣ γ~n)+ε,(∗)\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\,H(\sigma_{i}\,|\,\tau_{n})\le H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-h_{\mathcal{A}}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-h_{\mathcal{C}}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})<H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})+\varepsilon,\qquad(*)

the last inequality by Step 4 (iv).

For i∈Ji\in J let μ~i=(rn)#μi∈P(Rn)\tilde{\mu}_{i}=(r_{n})_{\#}\mu_{i}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). For F∈B(Rn)F\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), piμ~i(F)=μ(rn−1(F)∩Ai)=μ~n(F∩Ci)p_{i}\tilde{\mu}_{i}(F)=\mu(r_{n}^{-1}(F)\cap A_{i})=\tilde{\mu}_{n}(F\cap C_{i}), so μ~i\tilde{\mu}_{i} is the conditioned probability measure μ~n(⋅ ∣ Ci)\tilde{\mu}_{n}(\cdot\,|\,C_{i}), defined as μ~n(Ci)=pi>0\tilde{\mu}_{n}(C_{i})=p_{i}>0; in particular μ~i(Ci)=1\tilde{\mu}_{i}(C_{i})=1, and μ~i\tilde{\mu}_{i} is the measure with density pi−11Cip_{i}^{-1}\mathbf{1}_{C_{i}} with respect to μ~n\tilde{\mu}_{n} of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. Summing over ii and using that a cell with pi=0p_{i}=0 contributes μ~n(F∩Ci)≤pi=0\tilde{\mu}_{n}(F\cap C_{i})\le p_{i}=0, we get ∑i∈Jpiμ~i(F)=μ~n(F)\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\tilde{\mu}_{i}(F)=\tilde{\mu}_{n}(F); likewise ∑i∈Jpiμi(B)=∑i∈Jμ(B∩Ai)=μ(B)\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\mu_{i}(B)=\sum_{i\in J}\mu(B\cap A_{i})=\mu(B) for B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X).

Finally, μi\mu_{i}, σi\sigma_{i} and τn\tau_{n} belong to P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) for i∈Ji\in J. Indeed, μi\mu_{i} has density pi−11Aip_{i}^{-1}\mathbf{1}_{A_{i}} with respect to μ\mu by The Conditioned Probability Measure Given a Set of Positive Measure §conditioned, so by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, M2(μi)=pi−1∫1Ai∣x∣2 μ(dx)≤pi−1M2(μ)<∞M_{2}(\mu_{i})=p_{i}^{-1}\int\mathbf{1}_{A_{i}}|x|^{2}\,\mu(dx)\le p_{i}^{-1}M_{2}(\mu)<\infty, as μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by Step 1; and since ∣Qnx∣≤∣x∣|Q_{n}x|\le|x| by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, M2(σi)=∫∣Qnx∣2 μi(dx)≤M2(μi)M_{2}(\sigma_{i})=\int|Q_{n}x|^{2}\,\mu_{i}(dx)\le M_{2}(\mu_{i}) and M2(τn)=∫∣Qnx∣2 γc(dx)≤M2(γc)<∞M_{2}(\tau_{n})=\int|Q_{n}x|^{2}\,\gamma_{c}(dx)\le M_{2}(\gamma_{c})<\infty, with γc∈P2(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian; second moments are those of The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment.

Step 6 (A tail coupling on each cell). Fix i∈Ji\in J. Let αi=(Ψn)#(γ~n⊗σi)\alpha_{i}=(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma_{i}). Since σi\sigma_{i} has finite relative entropy with respect to τn\tau_{n} (Step 5), Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §tail-entropy shows that αi\alpha_{i} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and H(αi ∣ γc)≤H(σi ∣ τn)H(\alpha_{i}\,|\,\gamma_{c})\le H(\sigma_{i}\,|\,\tau_{n}). By Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space §connected and Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space §talagrand, αi∈Pρa\alpha_{i}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and Wa(αi,γc)2≤2κ H(αi ∣ γc)≤2κ H(σi ∣ τn)W_{a}(\alpha_{i},\gamma_{c})^{2}\le2\kappa\,H(\alpha_{i}\,|\,\gamma_{c})\le2\kappa\,H(\sigma_{i}\,|\,\tau_{n}). As αi∈Pρa\alpha_{i}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, the pair (αi,γc)(\alpha_{i},\gamma_{c}) is noise-connected by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space, so by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §optimal there is a noise-optimal coupling χi∈Πa(αi,γc)\chi_{i}\in\Pi^{a}(\alpha_{i},\gamma_{c}), with Ia(χi)=Wa(αi,γc)2I^{a}(\chi_{i})=W_{a}(\alpha_{i},\gamma_{c})^{2}.

Let Gn=(Qn∘π1,Qn∘π2):X×X→X×XG_{n}=(Q_{n}\circ\pi_{1},Q_{n}\circ\pi_{2}):X\times X\to X\times X, which is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma and Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and let ϑi=(Gn)#χi∈P(X×X)\vartheta_{i}=(G_{n})_{\#}\chi_{i}\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X). Its first marginal is (Qn)#αi=(Qn∘Ψn)#(γ~n⊗σi)(Q_{n})_{\#}\alpha_{i}=(Q_{n}\circ\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma_{i}); by (b) of Step 2, Qn∘Ψn(u,w)=QnwQ_{n}\circ\Psi_{n}(u,w)=Q_{n}w, and the second marginal of γ~n⊗σi\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma_{i} is σi\sigma_{i} (its value on Rn×B\mathbb{R}^{n}\times B is σi(B)\sigma_{i}(B) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure), so the first marginal of ϑi\vartheta_{i} is (Qn)#σi=(Qn∘Qn)#μi=σi(Q_{n})_{\#}\sigma_{i}=(Q_{n}\circ Q_{n})_{\#}\mu_{i}=\sigma_{i} by (a) of Step 2. Its second marginal is (Qn)#γc=τn(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\tau_{n}. So ϑi∈Π(σi,τn)\vartheta_{i}\in\Pi(\sigma_{i},\tau_{n}). If (x,y)∈Da(x,y)\in D_{a}, then Qny−Qnx=Qn(y−x)∈XaQ_{n}y-Q_{n}x=Q_{n}(y-x)\in X^{a} with na(Qn(y−x))≤na(y−x)n_{a}(Q_{n}(y-x))\le n_{a}(y-x) by (d) of Step 2, i.e. Gn(x,y)∈DaG_{n}(x,y)\in D_{a} and ca(Gn(x,y))≤ca(x,y)c_{a}(G_{n}(x,y))\le c_{a}(x,y). Since χi(Da)=1\chi_{i}(D_{a})=1 by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite, we get ϑi(Da)=χi(Gn−1(Da))≥χi(Da)=1\vartheta_{i}(D_{a})=\chi_{i}(G_{n}^{-1}(D_{a}))\ge\chi_{i}(D_{a})=1, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison,

∫ca dϑi=∫ca∘Gn dχi≤∫ca dχi=Ia(χi).\int c_{a}\,d\vartheta_{i}=\int c_{a}\circ G_{n}\,d\chi_{i}\le\int c_{a}\,d\chi_{i}=I^{a}(\chi_{i}).

Hence ϑi∈Πa(σi,τn)\vartheta_{i}\in\Pi^{a}(\sigma_{i},\tau_{n}) (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings) and

Ia(ϑi)≤Wa(αi,γc)2≤2κ H(σi ∣ τn).I^{a}(\vartheta_{i})\le W_{a}(\alpha_{i},\gamma_{c})^{2}\le2\kappa\,H(\sigma_{i}\,|\,\tau_{n}).

Step 7 (A coupling of μi\mu_{i} and En(μ~i)E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{i})). Fix i∈Ji\in J. The map (idX,Qn):X→X×X(\mathrm{id}_{X},Q_{n}):X\to X\times X is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and βi=(idX,Qn)#μi\beta_{i}=(\mathrm{id}_{X},Q_{n})_{\#}\mu_{i} has marginals μi\mu_{i} and (Qn)#μi=σi(Q_{n})_{\#}\mu_{i}=\sigma_{i}, so βi∈Π(μi,σi)\beta_{i}\in\Pi(\mu_{i},\sigma_{i}). Since μi,σi,τn∈P2(X)\mu_{i},\sigma_{i},\tau_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) (Step 5) and ϑi∈Π(σi,τn)\vartheta_{i}\in\Pi(\sigma_{i},\tau_{n}), Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued gives θi∈P(X(3))\theta_{i}\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}), with X(3)X_{(3)} and the Borel maps q1,q2,q3q_{1},q_{2},q_{3} of that lemma, such that (q1,q2)#θi=βi(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\theta_{i}=\beta_{i} and (q2,q3)#θi=ϑi(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\theta_{i}=\vartheta_{i}. Hence (q1)#θi=(π1)#βi=μi(q_{1})_{\#}\theta_{i}=(\pi_{1})_{\#}\beta_{i}=\mu_{i} and (q3)#θi=(π2)#ϑi=τn(q_{3})_{\#}\theta_{i}=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\vartheta_{i}=\tau_{n}.

Let Γ={(x,y)∈X×X:y=Qnx}\Gamma=\{(x,y)\in X\times X:y=Q_{n}x\}, which is closed since QnQ_{n} is continuous, hence Borel; βi(Γ)=μi(X)=1\beta_{i}(\Gamma)=\mu_{i}(X)=1. Let Ni⊆X(3)N_{i}\subseteq X_{(3)} be the union of (q1,q2)−1(X×X∖Γ)(q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(X\times X\setminus\Gamma), (q2,q3)−1(X×X∖Da)(q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(X\times X\setminus D_{a}) and q3−1(X∖Zn)q_{3}^{-1}(X\setminus Z_{n}). These sets are Borel with θi\theta_{i}-measures 1−βi(Γ)=01-\beta_{i}(\Gamma)=0, 1−ϑi(Da)=01-\vartheta_{i}(D_{a})=0 and 1−τn(Zn)=01-\tau_{n}(Z_{n})=0 (by (f) of Step 2), so θi(Ni)=0\theta_{i}(N_{i})=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-union. For ω∈X(3)∖Ni\omega\in X_{(3)}\setminus N_{i} we have q2(ω)=Qnq1(ω)q_{2}(\omega)=Q_{n}q_{1}(\omega), q3(ω)∈Znq_{3}(\omega)\in Z_{n}, and q3(ω)−Qnq1(ω)=q3(ω)−q2(ω)∈Xaq_{3}(\omega)-Q_{n}q_{1}(\omega)=q_{3}(\omega)-q_{2}(\omega)\in X^{a}.

Let ωi=θi⊗μ~i\omega_{i}=\theta_{i}\otimes\tilde{\mu}_{i} be the product measure on B(X(3))⊗B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(X_{(3)})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) given by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, a probability measure. Define Θ:X(3)×Rn→Rn×X\Theta:X_{(3)}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X by Θ(ω,v)=(v,q3(ω))\Theta(\omega,v)=(v,q_{3}(\omega)) and Φ:X(3)×Rn→X×X\Phi:X_{(3)}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to X\times X by Φ(ω,v)=(q1(ω),Ψn(v,q3(ω)))\Phi(\omega,v)=(q_{1}(\omega),\Psi_{n}(v,q_{3}(\omega))). The map Θ\Theta is measurable from B(X(3))⊗B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(X_{(3)})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) to B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X): the sets whose preimage is measurable form a σ\sigma-algebra (preimages commute with complements and countable unions), and it contains every rectangle F×BF\times B, whose preimage is the measurable rectangle q3−1(B)×Fq_{3}^{-1}(B)\times F, so it contains the σ\sigma-algebra these rectangles generate, which is the product σ\sigma-algebra. In the same way (ω,v)↦q1(ω)(\omega,v)\mapsto q_{1}(\omega) is measurable, the preimage of BB being q1−1(B)×Rnq_{1}^{-1}(B)\times\mathbb{R}^{n}. As Ψn\Psi_{n} is measurable for B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel, Φ\Phi is measurable into B(X×X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X) by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing. Let ϖi=Φ#ωi∈P(X×X)\varpi_{i}=\Phi_{\#}\omega_{i}\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X).

The first marginal of ϖi\varpi_{i} assigns to B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X) the value ωi(q1−1(B)×Rn)=μi(B)\omega_{i}(q_{1}^{-1}(B)\times\mathbb{R}^{n})=\mu_{i}(B). The measure Θ#ωi\Theta_{\#}\omega_{i} on B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) assigns to F×BF\times B the value ωi(q3−1(B)×F)=τn(B) μ~i(F)\omega_{i}(q_{3}^{-1}(B)\times F)=\tau_{n}(B)\,\tilde{\mu}_{i}(F), so it equals μ~i⊗τn\tilde{\mu}_{i}\otimes\tau_{n} by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure; as (π2)∘Φ=Ψn∘Θ(\pi_{2})\circ\Phi=\Psi_{n}\circ\Theta, the second marginal of ϖi\varpi_{i} is (Ψn)#(μ~i⊗τn)=En(μ~i)(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\mu}_{i}\otimes\tau_{n})=E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{i}) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension. Thus ϖi∈Π(μi,En(μ~i))\varpi_{i}\in\Pi(\mu_{i},E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{i})).

For (ω,v)(\omega,v) with ω∉Ni\omega\notin N_{i}, (e) of Step 2, applied with x=q1(ω)x=q_{1}(\omega), w′=q3(ω)w'=q_{3}(\omega) and t=q3(ω)−q2(ω)t=q_{3}(\omega)-q_{2}(\omega), gives Φ(ω,v)∈Da\Phi(\omega,v)\in D_{a} and

ca(Φ(ω,v))=∥v−rn(q1(ω))∥2+ca(q2(ω),q3(ω)).c_{a}(\Phi(\omega,v))=\lVert v-r_{n}(q_{1}(\omega))\rVert^{2}+c_{a}(q_{2}(\omega),q_{3}(\omega)).

The set Ni×RnN_{i}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} has ωi\omega_{i}-measure θi(Ni) μ~i(Rn)=0\theta_{i}(N_{i})\,\tilde{\mu}_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=0. Hence ϖi(Da)=ωi(Φ−1(Da))=1\varpi_{i}(D_{a})=\omega_{i}(\Phi^{-1}(D_{a}))=1. Both summands on the right are measurable functions of (ω,v)(\omega,v): the first, (ω,v)↦∥v−rn(q1(ω))∥2(\omega,v)\mapsto\lVert v-r_{n}(q_{1}(\omega))\rVert^{2}, is measurable by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, applied on the measurable space (X(3)×Rn,B(X(3))⊗B(Rn))(X_{(3)}\times\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(X_{(3)})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})) to the two maps (ω,v)↦v(\omega,v)\mapsto v and (ω,v)↦rn(q1(ω))(\omega,v)\mapsto r_{n}(q_{1}(\omega)) into Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, which are measurable by the rectangle argument above (the preimage of F∈B(Rn)F\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) under the first is X(3)×FX_{(3)}\times F, and the second is the Borel map rnr_{n} composed with the measurable map (ω,v)↦q1(ω)(\omega,v)\mapsto q_{1}(\omega)); the second is ca∘(q2,q3)c_{a}\circ(q_{2},q_{3}) composed with the projection to X(3)X_{(3)}. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison and Tonelli and Fubini Theorems,

∫ca dϖi=∫ca∘Φ dωi=ℓi+∫X(3)ca∘(q2,q3) dθi=ℓi+∫ca dϑi=ℓi+Ia(ϑi),\int c_{a}\,d\varpi_{i}=\int c_{a}\circ\Phi\,d\omega_{i}=\ell_{i}+\int_{X_{(3)}}c_{a}\circ(q_{2},q_{3})\,d\theta_{i}=\ell_{i}+\int c_{a}\,d\vartheta_{i}=\ell_{i}+I^{a}(\vartheta_{i}),

where, integrating first in ω\omega and using (q1)#θi=μi(q_{1})_{\#}\theta_{i}=\mu_{i} and (rn)#μi=μ~i(r_{n})_{\#}\mu_{i}=\tilde{\mu}_{i},

ℓi=∫Rn(∫X∥v−rn(x)∥2 μi(dx))μ~i(dv)=∫Rn(∫Rn∥v−u∥2 μ~i(du))μ~i(dv)∈[0,∞].\ell_{i}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Bigl(\int_{X}\lVert v-r_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu_{i}(dx)\Bigr)\tilde{\mu}_{i}(dv)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert v-u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}_{i}(du)\Bigr)\tilde{\mu}_{i}(dv)\in[0,\infty].

We bound ℓi\ell_{i}. If ii is small, then ∥v−u∥2<ε\lVert v-u\rVert^{2}<\varepsilon for u,v∈Ciu,v\in C_{i} and μ~i(Rn∖Ci)=0\tilde{\mu}_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus C_{i})=0, so two applications of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison give ℓi≤ε\ell_{i}\le\varepsilon. If ii is large, then ∥v−u∥2≤2∥u∥2+2∥v∥2\lVert v-u\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2\lVert v\rVert^{2}, so by Tonelli and Fubini Theorems and claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables with the density pi−11Cip_{i}^{-1}\mathbf{1}_{C_{i}} of Step 5,

ℓi≤4∫Rn∥u∥2 μ~i(du)=4pi∫Rn1Ci(u)∥u∥2 μ~n(du)≤4piM2(μ~n)<∞.\ell_{i}\le4\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}_{i}(du)=\frac{4}{p_{i}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{C_{i}}(u)\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}_{n}(du)\le\frac{4}{p_{i}}M_{2}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})<\infty .

In either case ℓi\ell_{i} is finite, so ϖi∈Πa(μi,En(μ~i))\varpi_{i}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu_{i},E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{i})) with Ia(ϖi)=ℓi+Ia(ϑi)I^{a}(\varpi_{i})=\ell_{i}+I^{a}(\vartheta_{i}).

Step 8 (Mixing the cells). Let ϖ=∑i∈Jpiϖi\varpi=\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\varpi_{i}, the set function B↦∑i∈Jpiϖi(B)B\mapsto\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\varpi_{i}(B) on B(X×X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X); by Nonnegative Combinations of Two Finite Measures, and the Average of Two Couplings §combination, applied finitely many times (induction on the number of terms), it is a measure, ϖ(X×X)=∑i∈Jpi=1\varpi(X\times X)=\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}=1 (as ∑i∈[m]pi=1\sum_{i\in[m]}p_{i}=1 and pi=0p_{i}=0 for i∉Ji\notin J, the preamble of The Partition Entropy of a Probability Measure Relative to Another over a Finite Measurable Partition), and ∫f dϖ=∑i∈Jpi∫f dϖi\int f\,d\varpi=\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\int f\,d\varpi_{i} for every nonnegative Borel ff. Its first marginal is B↦∑i∈Jpiμi(B)=μ(B)B\mapsto\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\mu_{i}(B)=\mu(B) by Step 5. Its second marginal is B↦∑i∈Jpi(μ~i⊗τn)(Ψn−1(B))B\mapsto\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}(\tilde{\mu}_{i}\otimes\tau_{n})(\Psi_{n}^{-1}(B)). The set function ∑i∈Jpi(μ~i⊗τn)\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}(\tilde{\mu}_{i}\otimes\tau_{n}) on B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) is a measure by the same claim, and it assigns to a rectangle F×BF\times B the value ∑i∈Jpiμ~i(F)τn(B)=μ~n(F)τn(B)\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\tilde{\mu}_{i}(F)\tau_{n}(B)=\tilde{\mu}_{n}(F)\tau_{n}(B) by Step 5; by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure it equals μ~n⊗τn\tilde{\mu}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n}. Hence the second marginal of ϖ\varpi is (Ψn)#(μ~n⊗τn)=En(μ~n)(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, and ϖ∈Π(μ,En(μ~n))\varpi\in\Pi(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})). Moreover ϖ(Da)=∑i∈Jpiϖi(Da)=1\varpi(D_{a})=\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\varpi_{i}(D_{a})=1 and ∫ca dϖ=∑i∈JpiIa(ϖi)<∞\int c_{a}\,d\varpi=\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}I^{a}(\varpi_{i})<\infty by Step 7. Therefore ϖ∈Πa(μ,En(μ~n))\varpi\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})) by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings, and

Ia(ϖ)=∑i∈Jpi ℓi+∑i∈Jpi Ia(ϑi).I^{a}(\varpi)=\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\,\ell_{i}+\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\,I^{a}(\vartheta_{i}).

Step 9 (The estimate; claim 2). Every i∈Ji\in J is small or large (Step 4 (iv)). The small indices contribute at most ∑i smallpiε≤ε\sum_{i\text{ small}}p_{i}\varepsilon\le\varepsilon to the first sum. For the large indices, the bound of Step 7 gives piℓi≤4∫1Ci(u)∥u∥2 μ~n(du)p_{i}\ell_{i}\le4\int\mathbf{1}_{C_{i}}(u)\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}_{n}(du), and the large cells are pairwise disjoint subsets of UU, so their sum of indicators is at most 1U\mathbf{1}_{U}; by Step 4 (i) the large indices contribute at most 4∫1U(u)∥u∥2 μ~n(du)<4ε4\int\mathbf{1}_{U}(u)\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\tilde{\mu}_{n}(du)<4\varepsilon. Hence ∑i∈Jpiℓi<5ε\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\ell_{i}<5\varepsilon. By Step 6 and (∗)(*),

∑i∈Jpi Ia(ϑi)≤2κ∑i∈Jpi H(σi ∣ τn)<2κ(H(μ ∣ γc)−H(μ~n ∣ γ~n))+2κε.\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\,I^{a}(\vartheta_{i})\le2\kappa\sum_{i\in J}p_{i}\,H(\sigma_{i}\,|\,\tau_{n})<2\kappa\bigl(H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})\bigr)+2\kappa\varepsilon .

By Step 1 and Step 8,

Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2≤Ia(ϖ)<2κ(H(μ ∣ γc)−H(μ~n ∣ γ~n))+(5+2κ)ε.W_{a}\bigl(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n})\bigr)^{2}\le I^{a}(\varpi)<2\kappa\bigl(H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})\bigr)+(5+2\kappa)\varepsilon .

The left side and the quantity Δn=2κ(H(μ ∣ γc)−H(μ~n ∣ γ~n))\Delta_{n}=2\kappa(H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})) do not depend on ε\varepsilon, which was an arbitrary positive real number fixed before all choices of Step 4. If we had Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2>ΔnW_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))^{2}>\Delta_{n}, the choice ε=(Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2−Δn)/(5+2κ)\varepsilon=(W_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))^{2}-\Delta_{n})/(5+2\kappa) would give a contradiction. Hence Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2≤ΔnW_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))^{2}\le\Delta_{n}, which is claim 2.

Step 10 (Convergence; claim 3). Since nn was arbitrary in Steps 1 to 9, claim 2 holds for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §heads, H(μ~n ∣ γ~n)→H(μ ∣ γc)H(\tilde{\mu}_{n}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n})\to H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}) as n→∞n\to\infty, so Δn→0\Delta_{n}\to0. Let ξ>0\xi>0, and choose n0∈Nn_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with Δn<ξ2\Delta_{n}<\xi^{2} for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. For such nn, claim 2 and the nonnegativity of WaW_{a} (The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance) give 0≤Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2<ξ20\le W_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))^{2}<\xi^{2}, hence 0≤Wa(μ,En(μ~n))<ξ0\le W_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))<\xi. Thus Wa(μ,En(μ~n))→0W_{a}(\mu,E_{n}(\tilde{\mu}_{n}))\to0, which is claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…