Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. The setting A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation is in force, so the reference measure is ρ=γc and the setting Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation is in force through A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §background; with the given κ, the hypotheses of Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space on c, κ and a hold, so that theorem applies to every member of P(X) of finite relative entropy with respect to γc. Integrals of nonnegative measurable functions are added, scaled and compared by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, integrals against image measures are computed by the change of variables formula of claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and image measures are those of claim 1 of that lemma; these tools are used without further mention. Throughout, n∈N is fixed, [n]={1,…,n}, and for x∈X we write xk=⟨x,ek⟩; SN(x)=∑k=1Nak−1xk2 is the partial sum of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums, and na, Da and ca are those of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel and The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs, so that ca(x,y)=na(y−x).
Step 1 (Membership; claim 1). By Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space §connected, μ∈Pρa. Hence μ∈P2(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments, and then μ~n=(rn)#μ∈P2(Rn) by Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head, which also shows that rn is continuous, hence Borel. Moreover γ~n∈P2(Rn) by Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §head-law. Applying Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance with λ=μ~n and λ′=γ~n gives En(μ~n)∈Pρa. Since μ and En(μ~n) both belong to Pρa, the pair (μ,En(μ~n)) is noise-connected by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected, so Wa(μ,En(μ~n)) is defined by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance, and Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2≤Ia(π) for every π∈Πa(μ,En(μ~n)). This proves claim 1.
Step 2 (Coordinate identities). Let Zn={w∈X:wk=0 for every k∈[n]}. It is a linear subspace of X, and it is Borel, being the intersection of the preimages of the closed set {0} under the finitely many coordinate functions x↦xk, k∈[n], which are continuous by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. We record six facts.
(a) For w∈X, Pnw=pn∗(pn(w))=∑j=1nwjej by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, so by orthonormality (Pnw)k=wk for k∈[n] and (Pnw)k=0 for k>n; hence (Qnw)k=0 for k∈[n] and (Qnw)k=wk for k>n. Consequently Qnw∈Zn for every w∈X; if w∈Zn then pn(w)=0, so Pnw=0 and Qnw=w; and Qn∘Qn=Qn. Likewise, for ζ∈Rn the vector pn∗(ζ)=∑j=1nζjej has k-th coordinate ζk for k∈[n] and 0 for k>n.
(b) For u∈Rn and w∈X, Ψn(u,w)=pn∗(η)+w with η=(a11/2u1,…,an1/2un). The maps pn, pn∗, Pn and Qn are linear, and pn(pn∗(η))=η by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, so Qnpn∗(η)=pn∗(η)−pn∗(pn(pn∗(η)))=0. Hence QnΨn(u,w)=Qnw. If moreover w∈Zn, then QnΨn(u,w)=w by (a), and pn(Ψn(u,w))=η+pn(w)=η, so that rn(Ψn(u,w))=(a1−1/2η1,…,an−1/2ηn)=u by the formula for rn in Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space.
(c) For x∈X, ak1/2(rn(x))k=ak1/2ak−1/2xk=xk for k∈[n], so Ψn(rn(x),Qnx)=pn∗(pn(x))+Qnx=Pnx+Qnx=x.
(d) Let z∈Xa. By (a), SN(Qnz)=∑n<k≤Nak−1zk2≤SN(z)≤∣z∣a2 for every N∈N, the last inequality by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums. By the same claim, Qnz∈Xa and ∣Qnz∣a2=supNSN(Qnz)≤∣z∣a2.
(e) Let x∈X, v∈Rn and w′∈Zn be such that t=w′−Qnx∈Xa, and let y=Ψn(v,w′). Then y−x∈Xa and ∣y−x∣a2=∥v−rn(x)∥2+∣t∣a2; that is, (x,y)∈Da and ca(x,y)=∥v−rn(x)∥2+ca(Qnx,w′). Indeed, by (b) and (c), y−x=pn∗(η−pn(x))+t with ηk=ak1/2vk, and t∈Zn because Zn is a linear subspace containing w′ and Qnx. By (a) and (c), the k-th coordinate of y−x is ak1/2(vk−(rn(x))k) for k∈[n] and tk for k>n. Hence for N≥n, SN(y−x)=∥v−rn(x)∥2+SN(t), since SN(t) has no contribution from k∈[n]. By The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums, SN(t)≤∣t∣a2 with supNSN(t)=∣t∣a2, and (SN(y−x))N is nondecreasing, so it is bounded above, y−x∈Xa, and ∣y−x∣a2=supN≥nSN(y−x)=∥v−rn(x)∥2+∣t∣a2.
(f) τn(Zn)=γc(Qn−1(Zn))=γc(X)=1 by (a) and A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails.
Step 3 (The Gaussian reference measure on head cells). We show that for all C∈B(Rn) and B∈B(X),
γc(rn−1(C)∩Qn−1(B))=γ~n(C)τn(B).
By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §reconstruction and The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, γc=(Ψn)#(γ~n⊗τn), with Ψn measurable for B(Rn)⊗B(X) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel. Let E=rn−1(C)∩Qn−1(B), a Borel set as rn and Qn are Borel. By (b) of Step 2, a point (u,w) with w∈Zn lies in Ψn−1(E) if and only if u∈C and w∈B; so Ψn−1(E)∩(Rn×Zn)=C×(B∩Zn). The rectangle Rn×(X∖Zn) has (γ~n⊗τn)-measure γ~n(Rn)τn(X∖Zn)=0 by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure and (f) of Step 2. Hence, by additivity of the measure over Ψn−1(E)∩(Rn×Zn) and Ψn−1(E)∖(Rn×Zn), the latter having measure 0 by monotonicity,
γc(E)=(γ~n⊗τn)(C×(B∩Zn))=γ~n(C)τn(B∩Zn)=γ~n(C)τn(B),
using Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure and τn(B∖Zn)=0. With B=X this gives γc(rn−1(C))=γ~n(C).
Step 4 (The order of choices). Fix a positive real number ε. We make the following choices, in this order; all later constructions involve no further choice of numbers.
(i) A radius R. For m∈N let fm(u)=∥u∥21{∥u∥≤m} on Rn; these are nonnegative Borel functions, nondecreasing in m, with pointwise supremum ∥u∥2. By Monotone Convergence Theorem, ∫fmdμ~n increases to the second moment M2(μ~n)=∫∥u∥2μ~n(du) of The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment, which is finite by Step 1 and The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space. Choose R=m∈N with ∫fmdμ~n>M2(μ~n)−ε; since ∥u∥2=fR(u)+∥u∥21U(u) with U={u∈Rn:∥u∥>R}, we get
∫Rn∥u∥21U(u)μ~n(du)<ε.
(ii) A partition C′. By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §heads (with m=n), μ~n has finite relative entropy with respect to γ~n. By Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §approximation, applied on (Rn,B(Rn)) with ν=μ~n and γ=γ~n, choose a finite measurable partition C′ of Rn with hC′(μ~n∣γ~n)>H(μ~n∣γ~n)−ε, the partition entropy being defined by Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §chain-rule.
(iii) A partition C′′. Let δ=(ε/n)1/2 and choose N∈N with R≤Nδ. For j∈{−N,…,N}n let Kj={u∈Rn:jkδ≤uk<(jk+1)δ for k∈[n]}∩{u:∥u∥≤R}. Each Kj is Borel, being a finite intersection of closed and open sets (the coordinate functions and ∥⋅∥ are continuous). The sets Kj are pairwise disjoint, because jk=⌊uk/δ⌋ for u∈Kj, and they cover {∥u∥≤R}: if ∥u∥≤R then ∣uk∣≤∥u∥≤Nδ by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn §coordinate, so jk=⌊uk/δ⌋∈{−N,…,N}. For u,u′∈Kj, ∣uk−uk′∣<δ for each k, so ∥u−u′∥2<nδ2=ε. Thus C′′, consisting of the sets Kj and the open set U, is a finite measurable partition of Rn each of whose cells either is contained in U or has ∥u−u′∥2<ε for all of its points u,u′.
(iv) The partition C. Let C=(C1,…,Cm) be an enumeration of the sets C′∩C′′ with C′ a cell of C′ and C′′ a cell of C′′. These are Borel, pairwise disjoint, and cover Rn, so C is a finite measurable partition of Rn which refines both C′ and C′′. By Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §refinement and (ii),
hC(μ~n∣γ~n)≥hC′(μ~n∣γ~n)>H(μ~n∣γ~n)−ε.
A nonempty cell Ci lies in exactly one cell of C′′; we call i small if that cell is some Kj, so that ∥u−u′∥2<ε for u,u′∈Ci, and large if it is U, so that Ci⊆U.
Step 5 (Pulling the partition back to X). Let Ai=rn−1(Ci) for i∈[m]. Since rn is Borel and preimages preserve disjointness and unions, A=(A1,…,Am) is a finite measurable partition of X. Let pi=μ(Ai)=μ~n(Ci) and qi=γc(Ai)=γ~n(Ci), the latter by Step 3, and let J={i∈[m]:0<pi}; for i∈J the cell Ci is nonempty and 0<qi by Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §chain-rule. The numbers pi, qi being the same for (μ,γc,A) and for (μ~n,γ~n,C), The Partition Entropy of a Probability Measure Relative to Another over a Finite Measurable Partition §partition-entropy gives hA(μ∣γc)=hC(μ~n∣γ~n).
For i∈J let μi=μ(⋅∣Ai) and γi=γc(⋅∣Ai) be the conditioned probability measures, which are the pieces of μ and of γc on Ai in Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies. For B∈B(X), Step 3 gives γi(Qn−1(B))=γc(Ai∩Qn−1(B))/qi=γ~n(Ci)τn(B)/γ~n(Ci)=τn(B); that is, (Qn)#γi=τn. Let σi=(Qn)#μi∈P(X). Applying Relative Entropy over a Finite Partition: the Chain Rule, Images of the Pieces, Refinement and Approximation by Partition Entropies §images on (X,B(X)) with ν=μ, γ=γc, the partition A and the Borel map R=Qn (Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity), each σi, i∈J, has finite relative entropy with respect to τn and
i∈J∑piH(σi∣τn)≤H(μ∣γc)−hA(μ∣γc)=H(μ∣γc)−hC(μ~n∣γ~n)<H(μ∣γc)−H(μ~n∣γ~n)+ε,(∗)
the last inequality by Step 4 (iv).
For i∈J let μ~i=(rn)#μi∈P(Rn). For F∈B(Rn), piμ~i(F)=μ(rn−1(F)∩Ai)=μ~n(F∩Ci), so μ~i is the conditioned probability measure μ~n(⋅∣Ci), defined as μ~n(Ci)=pi>0; in particular μ~i(Ci)=1, and μ~i is the measure with density pi−11Ci with respect to μ~n of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. Summing over i and using that a cell with pi=0 contributes μ~n(F∩Ci)≤pi=0, we get ∑i∈Jpiμ~i(F)=μ~n(F); likewise ∑i∈Jpiμi(B)=∑i∈Jμ(B∩Ai)=μ(B) for B∈B(X).
Finally, μi, σi and τn belong to P2(X) for i∈J. Indeed, μi has density pi−11Ai with respect to μ by The Conditioned Probability Measure Given a Set of Positive Measure §conditioned, so by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, M2(μi)=pi−1∫1Ai∣x∣2μ(dx)≤pi−1M2(μ)<∞, as μ∈P2(X) by Step 1; and since ∣Qnx∣≤∣x∣ by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, M2(σi)=∫∣Qnx∣2μi(dx)≤M2(μi) and M2(τn)=∫∣Qnx∣2γc(dx)≤M2(γc)<∞, with γc∈P2(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian; second moments are those of The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment.
Step 6 (A tail coupling on each cell). Fix i∈J. Let αi=(Ψn)#(γ~n⊗σi). Since σi has finite relative entropy with respect to τn (Step 5), Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §tail-entropy shows that αi has finite relative entropy with respect to γc and H(αi∣γc)≤H(σi∣τn). By Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space §connected and Talagrand's Inequality in the Noise Norm for a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on a Hilbert Space §talagrand, αi∈Pρa and Wa(αi,γc)2≤2κH(αi∣γc)≤2κH(σi∣τn). As αi∈Pρa, the pair (αi,γc) is noise-connected by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space, so by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §optimal there is a noise-optimal coupling χi∈Πa(αi,γc), with Ia(χi)=Wa(αi,γc)2.
Let Gn=(Qn∘π1,Qn∘π2):X×X→X×X, which is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma and Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and let ϑi=(Gn)#χi∈P(X×X). Its first marginal is (Qn)#αi=(Qn∘Ψn)#(γ~n⊗σi); by (b) of Step 2, Qn∘Ψn(u,w)=Qnw, and the second marginal of γ~n⊗σi is σi (its value on Rn×B is σi(B) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure), so the first marginal of ϑi is (Qn)#σi=(Qn∘Qn)#μi=σi by (a) of Step 2. Its second marginal is (Qn)#γc=τn. So ϑi∈Π(σi,τn). If (x,y)∈Da, then Qny−Qnx=Qn(y−x)∈Xa with na(Qn(y−x))≤na(y−x) by (d) of Step 2, i.e. Gn(x,y)∈Da and ca(Gn(x,y))≤ca(x,y). Since χi(Da)=1 by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite, we get ϑi(Da)=χi(Gn−1(Da))≥χi(Da)=1, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison,
∫cadϑi=∫ca∘Gndχi≤∫cadχi=Ia(χi).
Hence ϑi∈Πa(σi,τn) (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings) and
Ia(ϑi)≤Wa(αi,γc)2≤2κH(σi∣τn).
Step 7 (A coupling of μi and En(μ~i)). Fix i∈J. The map (idX,Qn):X→X×X is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and βi=(idX,Qn)#μi has marginals μi and (Qn)#μi=σi, so βi∈Π(μi,σi). Since μi,σi,τn∈P2(X) (Step 5) and ϑi∈Π(σi,τn), Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued gives θi∈P(X(3)), with X(3) and the Borel maps q1,q2,q3 of that lemma, such that (q1,q2)#θi=βi and (q2,q3)#θi=ϑi. Hence (q1)#θi=(π1)#βi=μi and (q3)#θi=(π2)#ϑi=τn.
Let Γ={(x,y)∈X×X:y=Qnx}, which is closed since Qn is continuous, hence Borel; βi(Γ)=μi(X)=1. Let Ni⊆X(3) be the union of (q1,q2)−1(X×X∖Γ), (q2,q3)−1(X×X∖Da) and q3−1(X∖Zn). These sets are Borel with θi-measures 1−βi(Γ)=0, 1−ϑi(Da)=0 and 1−τn(Zn)=0 (by (f) of Step 2), so θi(Ni)=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-union. For ω∈X(3)∖Ni we have q2(ω)=Qnq1(ω), q3(ω)∈Zn, and q3(ω)−Qnq1(ω)=q3(ω)−q2(ω)∈Xa.
Let ωi=θi⊗μ~i be the product measure on B(X(3))⊗B(Rn) given by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, a probability measure. Define Θ:X(3)×Rn→Rn×X by Θ(ω,v)=(v,q3(ω)) and Φ:X(3)×Rn→X×X by Φ(ω,v)=(q1(ω),Ψn(v,q3(ω))). The map Θ is measurable from B(X(3))⊗B(Rn) to B(Rn)⊗B(X): the sets whose preimage is measurable form a σ-algebra (preimages commute with complements and countable unions), and it contains every rectangle F×B, whose preimage is the measurable rectangle q3−1(B)×F, so it contains the σ-algebra these rectangles generate, which is the product σ-algebra. In the same way (ω,v)↦q1(ω) is measurable, the preimage of B being q1−1(B)×Rn. As Ψn is measurable for B(Rn)⊗B(X) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel, Φ is measurable into B(X×X) by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing. Let ϖi=Φ#ωi∈P(X×X).
The first marginal of ϖi assigns to B∈B(X) the value ωi(q1−1(B)×Rn)=μi(B). The measure Θ#ωi on B(Rn)⊗B(X) assigns to F×B the value ωi(q3−1(B)×F)=τn(B)μ~i(F), so it equals μ~i⊗τn by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure; as (π2)∘Φ=Ψn∘Θ, the second marginal of ϖi is (Ψn)#(μ~i⊗τn)=En(μ~i) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension. Thus ϖi∈Π(μi,En(μ~i)).
For (ω,v) with ω∈/Ni, (e) of Step 2, applied with x=q1(ω), w′=q3(ω) and t=q3(ω)−q2(ω), gives Φ(ω,v)∈Da and
ca(Φ(ω,v))=∥v−rn(q1(ω))∥2+ca(q2(ω),q3(ω)).
The set Ni×Rn has ωi-measure θi(Ni)μ~i(Rn)=0. Hence ϖi(Da)=ωi(Φ−1(Da))=1. Both summands on the right are measurable functions of (ω,v): the first, (ω,v)↦∥v−rn(q1(ω))∥2, is measurable by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, applied on the measurable space (X(3)×Rn,B(X(3))⊗B(Rn)) to the two maps (ω,v)↦v and (ω,v)↦rn(q1(ω)) into Rn, which are measurable by the rectangle argument above (the preimage of F∈B(Rn) under the first is X(3)×F, and the second is the Borel map rn composed with the measurable map (ω,v)↦q1(ω)); the second is ca∘(q2,q3) composed with the projection to X(3). By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison and Tonelli and Fubini Theorems,
∫cadϖi=∫ca∘Φdωi=ℓi+∫X(3)ca∘(q2,q3)dθi=ℓi+∫cadϑi=ℓi+Ia(ϑi),
where, integrating first in ω and using (q1)#θi=μi and (rn)#μi=μ~i,
ℓi=∫Rn(∫X∥v−rn(x)∥2μi(dx))μ~i(dv)=∫Rn(∫Rn∥v−u∥2μ~i(du))μ~i(dv)∈[0,∞].
We bound ℓi. If i is small, then ∥v−u∥2<ε for u,v∈Ci and μ~i(Rn∖Ci)=0, so two applications of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison give ℓi≤ε. If i is large, then ∥v−u∥2≤2∥u∥2+2∥v∥2, so by Tonelli and Fubini Theorems and claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables with the density pi−11Ci of Step 5,
ℓi≤4∫Rn∥u∥2μ~i(du)=pi4∫Rn1Ci(u)∥u∥2μ~n(du)≤pi4M2(μ~n)<∞.
In either case ℓi is finite, so ϖi∈Πa(μi,En(μ~i)) with Ia(ϖi)=ℓi+Ia(ϑi).
Step 8 (Mixing the cells). Let ϖ=∑i∈Jpiϖi, the set function B↦∑i∈Jpiϖi(B) on B(X×X); by Nonnegative Combinations of Two Finite Measures, and the Average of Two Couplings §combination, applied finitely many times (induction on the number of terms), it is a measure, ϖ(X×X)=∑i∈Jpi=1 (as ∑i∈[m]pi=1 and pi=0 for i∈/J, the preamble of The Partition Entropy of a Probability Measure Relative to Another over a Finite Measurable Partition), and ∫fdϖ=∑i∈Jpi∫fdϖi for every nonnegative Borel f. Its first marginal is B↦∑i∈Jpiμi(B)=μ(B) by Step 5. Its second marginal is B↦∑i∈Jpi(μ~i⊗τn)(Ψn−1(B)). The set function ∑i∈Jpi(μ~i⊗τn) on B(Rn)⊗B(X) is a measure by the same claim, and it assigns to a rectangle F×B the value ∑i∈Jpiμ~i(F)τn(B)=μ~n(F)τn(B) by Step 5; by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure it equals μ~n⊗τn. Hence the second marginal of ϖ is (Ψn)#(μ~n⊗τn)=En(μ~n) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, and ϖ∈Π(μ,En(μ~n)). Moreover ϖ(Da)=∑i∈Jpiϖi(Da)=1 and ∫cadϖ=∑i∈JpiIa(ϖi)<∞ by Step 7. Therefore ϖ∈Πa(μ,En(μ~n)) by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings, and
Ia(ϖ)=i∈J∑piℓi+i∈J∑piIa(ϑi).
Step 9 (The estimate; claim 2). Every i∈J is small or large (Step 4 (iv)). The small indices contribute at most ∑i smallpiε≤ε to the first sum. For the large indices, the bound of Step 7 gives piℓi≤4∫1Ci(u)∥u∥2μ~n(du), and the large cells are pairwise disjoint subsets of U, so their sum of indicators is at most 1U; by Step 4 (i) the large indices contribute at most 4∫1U(u)∥u∥2μ~n(du)<4ε. Hence ∑i∈Jpiℓi<5ε. By Step 6 and (∗),
i∈J∑piIa(ϑi)≤2κi∈J∑piH(σi∣τn)<2κ(H(μ∣γc)−H(μ~n∣γ~n))+2κε.
By Step 1 and Step 8,
Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2≤Ia(ϖ)<2κ(H(μ∣γc)−H(μ~n∣γ~n))+(5+2κ)ε.
The left side and the quantity Δn=2κ(H(μ∣γc)−H(μ~n∣γ~n)) do not depend on ε, which was an arbitrary positive real number fixed before all choices of Step 4. If we had Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2>Δn, the choice ε=(Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2−Δn)/(5+2κ) would give a contradiction. Hence Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2≤Δn, which is claim 2.
Step 10 (Convergence; claim 3). Since n was arbitrary in Steps 1 to 9, claim 2 holds for every n∈N. By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §heads, H(μ~n∣γ~n)→H(μ∣γc) as n→∞, so Δn→0. Let ξ>0, and choose n0∈N with Δn<ξ2 for n≥n0. For such n, claim 2 and the nonnegativity of Wa (The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance) give 0≤Wa(μ,En(μ~n))2<ξ2, hence 0≤Wa(μ,En(μ~n))<ξ. Thus Wa(μ,En(μ~n))→0, which is claim 3.