TheoremBase

Computes Riemann integrals over [-n, n] by the fundamental theorem of calculus and integration by parts, and passes to the Lebesgue integral over the line through the exhaustion lemma for nonnegative continuous functions; the first moment follows by dominated convergence.

Proof

Throughout, the axiom of dependent choice is assumed, as the results on λ\lambda cited below require; λ\lambda is a measure on (R,B(R))(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})) (Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line: Existence, Lengths of Intervals and Uniqueness (iv)); continuous maps R→R\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} are measurable (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (iv)); nn ranges over N\mathbb{N}, so n>0n>0 in R\mathbb{R} (Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vi)) and −n<n-n<n; and for a<ba<b and g:R→Rg:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} with g∣[a,b]g|_{[a,b]} continuous we write ∫abg\int_{a}^{b}g for the Riemann integral of g∣[a,b]g|_{[a,b]}, and use that g1[a,b]∈L1(λ)g\mathbf{1}_{[a,b]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) with ∫Rg1[a,b] dλ=∫abg\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\mathbf{1}_{[a,b]}\,d\lambda=\int_{a}^{b}g (The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (i)). For a continuous hh on R\mathbb{R} we write In(h)=∫−nnhI_{n}(h)=\int_{-n}^{n}h; by The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (i) and linearity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vii)), InI_{n} is linear in hh.

Step 1 (derivatives and bounds). The map q(x)=−x2/2q(x)=-x^{2}/2 is differentiable on the interval R\mathbb{R} with q′(x)=−xq'(x)=-x (Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (ii), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (vi), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (v)), so g0=exp⁡∘qg_{0}=\exp\circ q is differentiable with g0′(x)=−xexp⁡(−x2/2)g_{0}'(x)=-x\exp(-x^{2}/2) (Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (vii), Chain Rule for Real Functions on Intervals (i)). Hence, by Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (v), G=−g0G=-g_{0} satisfies G′=g1G'=g_{1}, and g1(x)=x g0(x)g_{1}(x)=x\,g_{0}(x) and g2(x)=x g1(x)g_{2}(x)=x\,g_{1}(x) are differentiable on R\mathbb{R}, with, by the product rule and the sum rule (Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (vi), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (iv)),

G′(x)=g1(x),g1′(x)=g0(x)+x g0′(x)=g0(x)−g2(x)(x∈R).G'(x)=g_{1}(x),\qquad g_{1}'(x)=g_{0}(x)+x\,g_{0}'(x)=g_{0}(x)-g_{2}(x)\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}).

So g0,g1,g2g_{0},g_{1},g_{2} and GG are continuous on R\mathbb{R} (The Increment Form of the Derivative, and Differentiability Implies Continuity (ii)), and for a<ba<b the restriction of a map differentiable on R\mathbb{R} to [a,b][a,b] is differentiable there with the restricted derivative, and the restriction of a continuous map is continuous (Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative (ii), Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative (i)). Since exp⁡\exp is positive with exp⁡(0)=1\exp(0)=1 (Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (iii), Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (i)), we have g0>0g_{0}>0, g2≥0g_{2}\ge0 and g0(0)=1g_{0}(0)=1. Finally g0(x)=1/exp⁡(x2/2)g_{0}(x)=1/\exp(x^{2}/2) and exp⁡(x2/2)≥1+x2/2\exp(x^{2}/2)\ge1+x^{2}/2 (Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (iv), Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (v)), so

g0(x)(1+x2/2)≤1,henceg0(x)≤1andx2g0(x)≤2(x∈R).g_{0}(x)\bigl(1+x^{2}/2\bigr)\le1,\qquad\text{hence}\qquad g_{0}(x)\le1\quad\text{and}\quad x^{2}g_{0}(x)\le2\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}).

Step 2 (integrals over compact intervals). Let F:R→RF:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be differentiable with continuous derivative ff, and let a<ba<b. Then f∣[a,b]f|_{[a,b]} is bounded and integrable (A Continuous Function on a Closed Interval is Riemann Integrable (i)), F∣[a,b]F|_{[a,b]} is continuous with derivative ff on (a,b)(a,b) by Step 1, and the fundamental theorem of calculus (Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II: Evaluating an Integral by an Antiderivative (i)) gives ∫abf=F(b)−F(a)\int_{a}^{b}f=F(b)-F(a). Applied to F=GF=G, to F=g0F=g_{0} (with f=−g1f=-g_{1}) and to F(t)=tF(t)=t (with ff the constant 11, continuous as a differentiable map, Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (ii), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (i)), this gives

∫0ng1=1−exp⁡(−n2/2)=∫−n0(−g1),∫−nng1=G(n)−G(−n)=0,∫−111=2.\int_{0}^{n}g_{1}=1-\exp(-n^{2}/2)=\int_{-n}^{0}(-g_{1}),\qquad\int_{-n}^{n}g_{1}=G(n)-G(-n)=0,\qquad\int_{-1}^{1}1=2 .

Step 3 ((i)). For every nn we have, pointwise on R\mathbb{R},

g01[−n,n]≤1[−1,1]+g11[0,n]+(−g1)1[−n,0].g_{0}\mathbf{1}_{[-n,n]}\le\mathbf{1}_{[-1,1]}+g_{1}\mathbf{1}_{[0,n]}+(-g_{1})\mathbf{1}_{[-n,0]} .

Indeed all three terms on the right are nonnegative; on [−1,1][-1,1] the left side is at most 11 by Step 1; for 1≤x≤n1\le x\le n it is g0(x)≤x g0(x)=g1(x)g_{0}(x)\le x\,g_{0}(x)=g_{1}(x); for −n≤x≤−1-n\le x\le-1 it is g0(x)≤−x g0(x)=−g1(x)g_{0}(x)\le-x\,g_{0}(x)=-g_{1}(x); and for ∣x∣>n|x|>n it is 00. All four functions lie in L1(λ)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) (The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (i), for 1[−1,1]\mathbf{1}_{[-1,1]} with g≡1g\equiv1), so linearity and monotonicity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vii), Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (ix)) and Step 2 give

In(g0)≤2+2(1−exp⁡(−n2/2))≤4.I_{n}(g_{0})\le2+2\bigl(1-\exp(-n^{2}/2)\bigr)\le4 .

Hence g0∈L1(λ)g_{0}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) by The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (iii), and cG=sup⁡nIn(g0)≤4c_{\mathrm{G}}=\sup_{n}I_{n}(g_{0})\le4 by The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (ii), the supremum being taken in [0,∞][0,\infty] (Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (iii)). So cGc_{\mathrm{G}} is a real number, equal to the integral of g0g_{0} as an element of L1(λ)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vi)), and In(g0)≤cGI_{n}(g_{0})\le c_{\mathrm{G}} for every nn. For positivity, g11[0,1]≤g0g_{1}\mathbf{1}_{[0,1]}\le g_{0} on R\mathbb{R}, since x g0(x)≤g0(x)x\,g_{0}(x)\le g_{0}(x) for 0≤x≤10\le x\le1 and the left side vanishes elsewhere; and exp⁡(−1/2)=g0(1)≤2/3<1\exp(-1/2)=g_{0}(1)\le2/3<1 by the bound of Step 1. So monotonicity and Step 2 give

cG≥∫01g1=1−exp⁡(−1/2)>0.c_{\mathrm{G}}\ge\int_{0}^{1}g_{1}=1-\exp(-1/2)>0 .

Step 4 (the integral of g2g_{2}). By Step 1, g1g_{1} is differentiable with the continuous derivative g0−g2g_{0}-g_{2}, so Step 2 with F=g1F=g_{1} and the linearity of InI_{n} give

In(g0)−In(g2)=g1(n)−g1(−n)=2nexp⁡(−n2/2).I_{n}(g_{0})-I_{n}(g_{2})=g_{1}(n)-g_{1}(-n)=2n\exp(-n^{2}/2).

Thus In(g2)≤In(g0)≤cGI_{n}(g_{2})\le I_{n}(g_{0})\le c_{\mathrm{G}}, so g2∈L1(λ)g_{2}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) by The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (iii), and by The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (iv)

In(g2)→∫Rg2 dλ,In(g0)→cG.I_{n}(g_{2})\to\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{2}\,d\lambda,\qquad I_{n}(g_{0})\to c_{\mathrm{G}} .

Since In(g2)≤cGI_{n}(g_{2})\le c_{\mathrm{G}} for every nn, Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (x) gives ∫Rg2 dλ≤cG\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{2}\,d\lambda\le c_{\mathrm{G}}. Conversely, the bound x2g0(x)≤2x^{2}g_{0}(x)\le2 of Step 1 gives

0≤2nexp⁡(−n2/2)=2n n2g0(n)≤4n.0\le2n\exp(-n^{2}/2)=\frac{2}{n}\,n^{2}g_{0}(n)\le\frac{4}{n}.

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. Choose N1∈NN_{1}\in\mathbb{N} with In(g0)>cG−ε/2I_{n}(g_{0})>c_{\mathrm{G}}-\varepsilon/2 for every n≥N1n\ge N_{1}, and, by The Integers in the Real Numbers: Greatest Elements, the Integer Part, and Archimedean Consequences (vii) applied to 8/ε8/\varepsilon, an N2∈NN_{2}\in\mathbb{N} with n>8/εn>8/\varepsilon, that is 4/n<ε/24/n<\varepsilon/2, for every n≥N2n\ge N_{2}. For n≥max⁡(N1,N2)n\ge\max(N_{1},N_{2}) then In(g2)≥In(g0)−4/n>cG−εI_{n}(g_{2})\ge I_{n}(g_{0})-4/n>c_{\mathrm{G}}-\varepsilon, so ∫Rg2 dλ≥cG−ε\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{2}\,d\lambda\ge c_{\mathrm{G}}-\varepsilon by Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (x). As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, ∫Rg2 dλ=cG\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{2}\,d\lambda=c_{\mathrm{G}}.

Step 5 (the integral of g1g_{1}). Since ∣x∣≤1+x2|x|\le1+x^{2}, we have ∣g1∣≤g0+g2|g_{1}|\le g_{0}+g_{2}, and g0+g2∈L1(λ)g_{0}+g_{2}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) by Steps 3 and 4 (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vii)); as g1g_{1} is measurable, g1∈L1(λ)g_{1}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda) (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (v)). Hence h=g0+g1+g2h=g_{0}+g_{1}+g_{2} lies in L1(λ)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda), with

∫Rh dλ=2cG+∫Rg1 dλ\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\lambda=2c_{\mathrm{G}}+\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{1}\,d\lambda

by linearity and Step 4. Moreover h(x)=(1+x+x2) g0(x)≥0h(x)=(1+x+x^{2})\,g_{0}(x)\ge0, as 1+x+x2=(x+1/2)2+3/4>01+x+x^{2}=(x+1/2)^{2}+3/4>0, and hh is continuous by Step 1; so In(h)→∫Rh dλI_{n}(h)\to\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\lambda by The Lebesgue Integral over ℝ of a Nonnegative Continuous Function as the Limit of Its Riemann Integrals over [−n, n] (iv). On the other hand In(g1)=0I_{n}(g_{1})=0 by Step 2, so the linearity of InI_{n} and Step 4 give

In(h)=In(g0)+In(g2)→2cGI_{n}(h)=I_{n}(g_{0})+I_{n}(g_{2})\to2c_{\mathrm{G}}

(Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi)). By uniqueness of limits (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (ii)), 2cG+∫Rg1 dλ=2cG2c_{\mathrm{G}}+\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{1}\,d\lambda=2c_{\mathrm{G}}, so ∫Rg1 dλ=0\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{1}\,d\lambda=0. Steps 4 and 5 prove (ii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…