TheoremBase

Proof

For v∈Rmv\in\mathbb{R}^{m} write v⋅Z=∑j=1mvjZjv\cdot Z=\sum_{j=1}^{m}v_jZ_j, a random variable by the closure preliminaries of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product, so that Wi=wi⋅ZW_i=w_i\cdot Z with the dot product of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}.

Step 1: Transport along compositions of plane rotations. Assume m≥2m\ge2 and let gg be a plane rotation of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. If Y=(Y1,…,Ym)Y=(Y_1,\dots,Y_m) is an independent standard normal family, write g(Y)g(Y) for the family whose value at ω\omega is g(Y(ω))g\bigl(Y(\omega)\bigr); by Plane Rotations Preserve Independent Standard Normal Families, g(Y)g(Y) is again an independent standard normal family. Moreover, applying Plane Rotations Preserve the Dot Product pointwise with u=Y(ω)u=Y(\omega),

v⋅Y=g(v)⋅g(Y)pointwise on Ω, for every v∈Rm.v\cdot Y=g(v)\cdot g(Y)\qquad\text{pointwise on }\Omega,\ \text{for every }v\in\mathbb{R}^{m}.

Iterating both facts along a finite composition of plane rotations h=gL∘⋯∘g1h=g_L\circ\dots\circ g_1, with h(Y)h(Y) defined by successive application: h(Y)h(Y) is an independent standard normal family and v⋅Y=h(v)⋅h(Y)v\cdot Y=h(v)\cdot h(Y) pointwise, for every v∈Rmv\in\mathbb{R}^{m} (both statements being trivial for the empty composition).

Step 2: The case m=1m=1. By part 1 of Alignment of Orthonormal Families by Plane Rotations, p≤m=1p\le m=1, so p=1p=1, and w1=(w11)w_1=(w_{11}) with w112=1w_{11}^{2}=1, so w11=±1w_{11}=\pm1. Then W1=Z1W_1=Z_1 or W1=−Z1W_1=-Z_1, which is standard normal, in the second case by Claim 3 of Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure and Symmetry of the Standard Normal Distribution; a family of one random variable is independent, the product identity being trivial.

Step 3: The case m≥2m\ge2. By Alignment of Orthonormal Families by Plane Rotations, p≤mp\le m and there exist a finite composition hh of plane rotations of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} and ε∈{1,−1}\varepsilon\in\{1,-1\} with h(wk)=ekh(w_k)=e_k for 1≤k≤p−11\le k\le p-1 and h(wp)=ε eph(w_p)=\varepsilon\,e_p, where e1,…,eme_1,\dots,e_m are the standard basis vectors. Let Z′=h(Z)Z'=h(Z) as in Step 1: an independent standard normal family with wk⋅Z=h(wk)⋅Z′w_k\cdot Z=h(w_k)\cdot Z' pointwise for every kk. Since ek⋅Z′=Zk′e_k\cdot Z'=Z'_k,

Wk=Zk′(1≤k≤p−1),Wp=ε Zp′.W_k=Z'_k\quad(1\le k\le p-1),\qquad W_p=\varepsilon\,Z'_p .

If ε=1\varepsilon=1, then (W1,…,Wp)=(Z1′,…,Zp′)(W_1,\dots,W_p)=(Z'_1,\dots,Z'_p) is a subfamily of an independent standard normal family, hence an independent standard normal family (directly from Independence of Events and of Random Variables).

If ε=−1\varepsilon=-1, then Wp=−Zp′W_p=-Z'_p is standard normal by Claim 3 of Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure and Symmetry of the Standard Normal Distribution, and W1,…,Wp−1W_1,\dots,W_{p-1} are standard normal as before. For Borel sets B1,…,BpB_1,\dots,B_p, the event {−Zp′∈Bp}\{-Z'_p\in B_p\} equals {Zp′∈−Bp}\{Z'_p\in-B_p\}, and −Bp-B_p is Borel by Claim 1 of Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure and Symmetry of the Standard Normal Distribution; hence, by the independence of Z1′,…,Zp′Z'_1,\dots,Z'_p,

P(⋂k=1p−1{Wk∈Bk}∩{Wp∈Bp})=∏k=1p−1P(Zk′∈Bk)⋅P(Zp′∈−Bp)=∏k=1pP(Wk∈Bk),P\Bigl(\bigcap_{k=1}^{p-1}\{W_k\in B_k\}\cap\{W_p\in B_p\}\Bigr)=\prod_{k=1}^{p-1}P(Z'_k\in B_k)\cdot P(Z'_p\in-B_p)=\prod_{k=1}^{p}P(W_k\in B_k),

using P(Zp′∈−Bp)=P(−Zp′∈Bp)=P(Wp∈Bp)P(Z'_p\in-B_p)=P(-Z'_p\in B_p)=P(W_p\in B_p). The identity for every subfamily follows by taking Bk=RB_k=\mathbb{R} for omitted indices. Hence W1,…,WpW_1,\dots,W_p are independent in the sense of Independence of Events and of Random Variables. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…