TheoremBase

Regularise the test function and the entropy penalty by the heat semigroup, apply the viscosity inequality at maximisers of the regularised problem, absorb the score perturbation into the Fisher information to bound it, and pass to the limit using closedness of the score along couplings.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Claim 1 is proved in Steps 0 to 7; Step 8 lists precisely what changes for claim 2. The choices are made in this order: the constants δ0\delta_{0}, CRC_{R} and the function cc (Step 0); then φ\varphi, δ\delta and μ\mu (Step 2); then the times sns_{n}, the functions ψn\psi_{n} and the maximisers μn\mu_{n} (Step 2); then the integer KK and the index n0n_{0} (Step 5); then the constants BB, MM and CC (Step 6).

Step 0 (Constants). Let δ0>0\delta_{0}>0 and, for every real R>0R>0, CR≥0C_{R}\ge0 be as in the score-perturbation bound. For a real r≥0r\ge0 the set of integers kk with 1≤k≤r+11\le k\le r+1 is finite and contains 11; let c(r)c(r) be the largest of the numbers CkC_{k} with kk in this set. Then c(r)≥0c(r)\ge0, and cc is nondecreasing on [0,∞)[0,\infty), because for r≤r′r\le r' the set belonging to rr is contained in the set belonging to r′r'. We show that δ0\delta_{0} and cc have the property required in Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §sub (and, in Step 8, in Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §super).

Step 1 (Three auxiliary facts). (a) By The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §metric and The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §compact, P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) is sequentially compact in the metric space (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}), hence compact by A Sequentially Compact Subset of a Metric Space is Compact; it is nonempty (the Dirac measure at the origin belongs to it, by Dirac Measures on Euclidean Space: Probability Measure, Integrals, Push-Forwards and the Coupling of Two Dirac Measures §measure and 0∈Q0\in Q). Hence every upper semicontinuous function on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) attains a maximum, by claim 1 of Semicontinuous Functions Attain Their Extrema on a Compact Set; every lower semicontinuous one attains a minimum, by claim 2 of that theorem; and every continuous one attains a minimum and a maximum, by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space.

(b) Let EE be real, and let (λj)j∈N(\lambda_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in PEnt(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with Ent(λj)≤E\mathrm{Ent}(\lambda_{j})\le E for every jj that converges to some λˉ\bar\lambda. Then λˉ∈PEnt(Td)\bar\lambda\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §closed, and for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is JJ with Ent(λj)>Ent(λˉ)−ε\mathrm{Ent}(\lambda_{j})>\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon for every j≥Jj\ge J. Indeed, otherwise the set of indices jj with Ent(λj)≤Ent(λˉ)−ε\mathrm{Ent}(\lambda_{j})\le\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon is infinite; listing it increasingly gives a subsequence of (λj)(\lambda_{j}), which converges to λˉ\bar\lambda by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit, and The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §closed applied to it with the bound Ent(λˉ)−ε\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon gives Ent(λˉ)≤Ent(λˉ)−ε\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)\le\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon, which is absurd.

(c) Let (λn)n∈N(\lambda_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converge to λ\lambda in P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and let (tn)n∈N(t_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be real numbers with 0<tn≤120<t_{n}\le\tfrac12 converging to 00. By the triangle inequality for the metric WTW_{\mathbb{T}} (The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §metric) and Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §distance,

WT(Stnλn,λ)≤WT(Stnλn,λn)+WT(λn,λ)≤d tn+WT(λn,λ),W_{\mathbb{T}}(S_{t_{n}}\lambda_{n},\lambda)\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(S_{t_{n}}\lambda_{n},\lambda_{n})+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\lambda_{n},\lambda)\le\sqrt{d\,t_{n}}+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\lambda_{n},\lambda),

so (Stnλn)n∈N(S_{t_{n}}\lambda_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to λ\lambda.

Step 2 (Setup). Let uu be an upper semicontinuous viscosity subsolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}). Fix an intrinsic test function φ\varphi on Pac(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), a real δ\delta with 0<δ≤δ00<\delta\le\delta_{0}, and μ∈PEnt(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with G(ν)<G(μ)G(\nu)<G(\mu) for every ν∈PEnt(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with ν≠μ\nu\ne\mu, where

G(ν):=u(ν)−φ(ν)−δ Ent(ν)(ν∈PEnt(Td)).G(\nu):=u(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu)\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})).

The measure μ\mu is absolutely continuous by The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §nonnegative, so ∇φ(μ)∈Tμ\nabla\varphi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability; put r:=∥∇φ(μ)∥μr:=\lVert\nabla\varphi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}. The function φ\varphi is continuous on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity.

For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} put sn:=1/(2(n+1))s_{n}:=1/(2(n+1)), so that 0<sn≤120<s_{n}\le\tfrac12 and (sn)(s_{n}) converges to 00, and

ψn:=φ∘Ssn+δ Ent∘Ssn.\psi_{n}:=\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}}+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}}.

By Heat Regularisation of an Intrinsic Test Function: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Pairing of the Gradient with the Score §test and Heat Regularisation of the Entropy: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Fisher Information §test, φ∘Ssn\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}} and Ent∘Ssn\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}} are Laplacian test functions, with gradient fields gn(ν,x):=Asnν∇φ(Ssnν)(x)g^{n}(\nu,x):=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu)(x) and hn(ν,x):=AsnνξSsnν(x)h^{n}(\nu,x):=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}(x) respectively, and ∇(φ∘Ssn)(ν)=Asnν∇φ(Ssnν)\nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}})(\nu)=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu) and ∇(Ent∘Ssn)(ν)=AsnνξSsnν\nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}})(\nu)=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu} for every ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). Both are intrinsic test functions on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test. By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §linear, ψn\psi_{n} is a Laplacian test function with gradient field gn+δhng^{n}+\delta h^{n}, and

∇ψn(ν)=Asnν∇φ(Ssnν)+δ AsnνξSsnν(ν∈P(Td)).\nabla\psi_{n}(\nu)=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu)+\delta\,A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d})).

By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §unique, gn+δhng^{n}+\delta h^{n}, gng^{n} and hnh^{n} are the gradient fields of ψn\psi_{n}, φ∘Ssn\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}} and Ent∘Ssn\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}} used in The Laplacian of a Laplacian Test Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space §laplacian. Since each partial derivative of a component of gn(ν,⋅)+δhn(ν,⋅)g^{n}(\nu,\cdot)+\delta h^{n}(\nu,\cdot) is the corresponding combination of partial derivatives, and the integral is linear (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral), that definition gives Lψn=L(φ∘Ssn)+δ L(Ent∘Ssn)\mathcal{L}\psi_{n}=\mathcal{L}(\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}})+\delta\,\mathcal{L}(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}}); so Heat Regularisation of an Intrinsic Test Function: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Pairing of the Gradient with the Score §laplacian and Heat Regularisation of the Entropy: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Fisher Information §laplacian yield, for every ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),

Lψn(ν)=−⟨∇φ(Ssnν),ξSsnν⟩Ssnν−δ I(Ssnν).(2.1)\mathcal{L}\psi_{n}(\nu)=-\bigl\langle\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu),\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}\bigr\rangle_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}-\delta\,\mathcal{I}(S_{s_{n}}\nu).\qquad(2.1)

The function ψn\psi_{n} is continuous by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity, so u−ψnu-\psi_{n} is upper semicontinuous (at a point, given ε>0\varepsilon>0, take the smaller of the radii provided by the upper semicontinuity of uu and the continuity of ψn\psi_{n}, each for ε/2\varepsilon/2). By Step 1(a) we may choose μn∈P(Td)\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with u(ν)−ψn(ν)≤u(μn)−ψn(μn)u(\nu)-\psi_{n}(\nu)\le u(\mu_{n})-\psi_{n}(\mu_{n}) for every ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}).

Notation: νn:=Ssnμn\nu_{n}:=S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}, which lies in Pac(Td)∩PI(Td)∩PEnt(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\cap\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\cap\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures; Fn:=∇φ(νn)∈TνnF_{n}:=\nabla\varphi(\nu_{n})\in T_{\nu_{n}}; ξn:=ξνn\xi_{n}:=\xi_{\nu_{n}}; In:=I(νn)=∥ξn∥νn2I_{n}:=\mathcal{I}(\nu_{n})=\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2} by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information; pn:=AsnμnFnp_{n}:=A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}F_{n} and zn:=Asnμnξnz_{n}:=A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}\xi_{n}. Thus pn=∇(φ∘Ssn)(μn)p_{n}=\nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}})(\mu_{n}) and zn=∇(Ent∘Ssn)(μn)z_{n}=\nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}})(\mu_{n}), both in TμnT_{\mu_{n}} by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability, and ∇ψn(μn)=pn+δzn\nabla\psi_{n}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}+\delta z_{n}.

Step 3 (Comparison with μ\mu and an entropy bound). Taking ν=μ\nu=\mu in the maximality of μn\mu_{n}, and using Ent(Ssnμ)≤Ent(μ)\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s_{n}}\mu)\le\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) from Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §entropy together with δ>0\delta>0,

u(μn)−φ(νn)−δ Ent(νn)≥u(μ)−φ(Ssnμ)−δ Ent(Ssnμ)≥u(μ)−φ(Ssnμ)−δ Ent(μ).(3.1)u(\mu_{n})-\varphi(\nu_{n})-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s_{n}}\mu)\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu).\qquad(3.1)

By Step 1(a) there are reals UU, mm, m′m' with u≤Uu\le U and m≤φ≤m′m\le\varphi\le m' on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). Then (3.1) gives Ent(νn)≤E:=δ−1(U−m−u(μ)+m′)+Ent(μ)\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\le E:=\delta^{-1}\bigl(U-m-u(\mu)+m'\bigr)+\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) for every nn.

Step 4 (μn→μ\mu_{n}\to\mu and u(μn)→u(μ)u(\mu_{n})\to u(\mu)). First, every subsequence (μnk)k∈N(\mu_{n_{k}})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} has a further subsequence converging to μ\mu. By Step 1(a) there are a strictly increasing (kj)j∈N(k_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} and μˉ\bar\mu with (μnkj)j(\mu_{n_{k_{j}}})_{j} converging to μˉ\bar\mu. Put mj:=nkjm_{j}:=n_{k_{j}}; this is strictly increasing by claim 2 of A Subsequence of a Subsequence is a Subsequence, so mj≥jm_{j}\ge j and (smj)j(s_{m_{j}})_{j} converges to 00. By Step 1(c), (νmj)j(\nu_{m_{j}})_{j} converges to μˉ\bar\mu and (Ssmjμ)j(S_{s_{m_{j}}}\mu)_{j} converges to μ\mu. By Step 1(b) with the bound EE of Step 3, μˉ∈PEnt(Td)\bar\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By the upper semicontinuity of uu at μˉ\bar\mu, the continuity of φ\varphi at μˉ\bar\mu and at μ\mu, and Step 1(b), there is JJ such that u(μmJ)<u(μˉ)+εu(\mu_{m_{J}})<u(\bar\mu)+\varepsilon, φ(νmJ)>φ(μˉ)−ε\varphi(\nu_{m_{J}})>\varphi(\bar\mu)-\varepsilon, φ(SsmJμ)<φ(μ)+ε\varphi(S_{s_{m_{J}}}\mu)<\varphi(\mu)+\varepsilon and Ent(νmJ)>Ent(μˉ)−ε\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{m_{J}})>\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\mu)-\varepsilon. Inserting these into (3.1) with n=mJn=m_{J},

G(μˉ)+(2+δ)ε>u(μmJ)−φ(νmJ)−δ Ent(νmJ)≥u(μ)−φ(SsmJμ)−δ Ent(μ)>G(μ)−ε.G(\bar\mu)+(2+\delta)\varepsilon>u(\mu_{m_{J}})-\varphi(\nu_{m_{J}})-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{m_{J}})\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{m_{J}}}\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)>G(\mu)-\varepsilon.

As ε>0\varepsilon>0 is arbitrary, G(μˉ)≥G(μ)G(\bar\mu)\ge G(\mu), so μˉ=μ\bar\mu=\mu by the strict maximality of μ\mu.

Now suppose that (μn)(\mu_{n}) did not converge to μ\mu. Then there are a real ε0>0\varepsilon_{0}>0 and infinitely many nn with WT(μn,μ)≥ε0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\ge\varepsilon_{0}; listing them increasingly gives a subsequence no further subsequence of which converges to μ\mu, contradicting the previous paragraph. Hence (μn)(\mu_{n}) converges to μ\mu, and by Step 1(c) so do (νn)(\nu_{n}) and (Ssnμ)(S_{s_{n}}\mu).

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By the upper semicontinuity of uu at μ\mu, the continuity of φ\varphi at μ\mu, and Step 1(b) applied to (νn)(\nu_{n}) with the bound EE, there is NN such that for every n≥Nn\ge N: u(μn)<u(μ)+εu(\mu_{n})<u(\mu)+\varepsilon, ∣φ(νn)−φ(μ)∣<ε|\varphi(\nu_{n})-\varphi(\mu)|<\varepsilon, ∣φ(Ssnμ)−φ(μ)∣<ε|\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)-\varphi(\mu)|<\varepsilon and Ent(νn)>Ent(μ)−ε\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})>\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)-\varepsilon. Then (3.1) gives

u(μn)≥u(μ)−φ(Ssnμ)+φ(νn)−δ Ent(μ)+δ Ent(νn)>u(μ)−(2+δ)ε,u(\mu_{n})\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\varphi(\nu_{n})-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})>u(\mu)-(2+\delta)\varepsilon,

so ∣u(μn)−u(μ)∣<(2+δ)ε|u(\mu_{n})-u(\mu)|<(2+\delta)\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. Hence (u(μn))(u(\mu_{n})) converges to u(μ)u(\mu).

Step 5 (The viscosity inequality at μn\mu_{n} and the score perturbation). Since ψn\psi_{n} is a Laplacian test function and μn\mu_{n} maximises u−ψnu-\psi_{n} over P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §sub applies to ψn\psi_{n} and μn\mu_{n}; with ∇ψn(μn)=pn+δzn\nabla\psi_{n}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}+\delta z_{n} and (2.1) at ν=μn\nu=\mu_{n} it gives

ρ u(μn)+H(μn,pn+δzn)+σ22⟨Fn,ξn⟩νn+σ2δ2 In≤0.(5.1)\rho\,u(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n}+\delta z_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{2}\,I_{n}\le0.\qquad(5.1)

Since μ∈Pac(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), (μn)(\mu_{n}) converges to μ\mu and (sn)(s_{n}) converges to 00, Heat Regularisation of an Intrinsic Test Function: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Pairing of the Gradient with the Score §convergence shows that ((νn,Fn))n((\nu_{n},F_{n}))_{n} and ((μn,pn))n((\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n} both converge along couplings to (μ,∇φ(μ))(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)). Let γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) be couplings as in that definition for the second sequence. On the probability space (Rd+d,γn)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\gamma_{n}) the maps Xn:=pn∘pr1X_{n}:=p_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and Y:=∇φ(μ)∘pr2Y:=\nabla\varphi(\mu)\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} (Borel representatives) are square-integrable with norms ∥pn∥μn\lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}} and rr, by the change-of-variables formula, the marginals of γn\gamma_{n} being μn\mu_{n} and μ\mu; and ∥Xn−Y∥2=Dγn(pn,∇φ(μ))\lVert X_{n}-Y\rVert^{2}=D_{\gamma_{n}}(p_{n},\nabla\varphi(\mu)). The triangle inequality for the norm of the real Hilbert space L2(Rd+d;Rd)L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d};\mathbb{R}^{d}) over γn\gamma_{n} (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors is a Real Hilbert Space; Its Laws Have Finite Second Moment; Constants and Translations §hilbert) gives ∣∥pn∥μn−r∣≤Dγn(pn,∇φ(μ))1/2\bigl|\lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}-r\bigr|\le D_{\gamma_{n}}(p_{n},\nabla\varphi(\mu))^{1/2}, which converges to 00. Hence (∥pn∥μn)(\lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}) converges to rr, and in the same way (∥Fn∥νn)(\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}) converges to rr.

Let KK be the least positive integer with K>rK>r. Then K≤r+1K\le r+1 (if K≥2K\ge2, then K−1K-1 is a positive integer that is not larger than rr), so CK≤c(r)C_{K}\le c(r) by Step 0. Since r<Kr<K, there is n0n_{0} with ∥pn∥μn≤K\lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}\le K for every n≥n0n\ge n_{0}.

The score ξn\xi_{n} has a Borel representative Rd→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} that is square-integrable with respect to νn=Ssnμn\nu_{n}=S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}, so Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average gives ∥zn∥μn2≤∥ξn∥νn2=In\lVert z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}\le\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2}=I_{n}. For n≥n0n\ge n_{0} the score-perturbation bound, applied with μn\mu_{n}, p=pnp=p_{n}, ζ=zn\zeta=z_{n}, R=KR=K and δ\delta, gives

H(μn,pn+δzn)≥H(μn,pn)−σ2δ4∥zn∥μn2−CKδ≥H(μn,pn)−σ2δ4In−CKδ,H(\mu_{n},p_{n}+\delta z_{n})\ge H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\lVert z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}-C_{K}\delta\ge H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}-C_{K}\delta,

and with (5.1), for every n≥n0n\ge n_{0},

ρ u(μn)+H(μn,pn)+σ22⟨Fn,ξn⟩νn+σ2δ4 In≤CKδ.(5.2)\rho\,u(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\,I_{n}\le C_{K}\delta.\qquad(5.2)

Step 6 (A uniform bound on the Fisher information). Since pn∈Tμnp_{n}\in T_{\mu_{n}}, ∇φ(μ)∈Tμ\nabla\varphi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} and ((μn,pn))n((\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n} converges along couplings to (μ,∇φ(μ))(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)), the continuity of HH along couplings shows that (H(μn,pn))n(H(\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n} converges to H(μ,∇φ(μ))H(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)). The real sequences (u(μn))(u(\mu_{n})), (H(μn,pn))(H(\mu_{n},p_{n})) and (∥Fn∥νn)(\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}) converge (Step 4, the previous sentence and Step 5), hence are bounded (claim 2 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences); choose reals B≥0B\ge0 and M≥0M\ge0 with ∥Fn∥νn≤B\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le B and CKδ−ρ u(μn)−H(μn,pn)≤MC_{K}\delta-\rho\,u(\mu_{n})-H(\mu_{n},p_{n})\le M for every nn. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the real Hilbert space L2(νn;Rd)L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space), ∣⟨Fn,ξn⟩νn∣≤BIn|\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}|\le B\sqrt{I_{n}}. Put a:=σ2δ/4>0a:=\sigma^{2}\delta/4>0, b:=σ2B/2b:=\sigma^{2}B/2 and tn:=Int_{n}:=\sqrt{I_{n}}. Then (5.2) gives a tn2≤M+b tna\,t_{n}^{2}\le M+b\,t_{n} for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. If tn>2b/at_{n}>2b/a, then b tn<a tn2/2b\,t_{n}<a\,t_{n}^{2}/2, whence a tn2/2<Ma\,t_{n}^{2}/2<M; so in all cases In=tn2≤max⁡{4b2/a2, 2M/a}I_{n}=t_{n}^{2}\le\max\{4b^{2}/a^{2},\,2M/a\} for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. Let CC be the largest of max⁡{4b2/a2,2M/a}\max\{4b^{2}/a^{2},2M/a\} and I0,…,In0−1I_{0},\dots,I_{n_{0}-1}; then In≤CI_{n}\le C for every nn.

Step 7 (Passage to the limit). Apply Lower Semicontinuity of the Torus Fisher Information and Closedness of the Score Along Couplings to the sequence (νn)(\nu_{n}) in PI(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), which converges to μ\mu (Step 4), with the bound CC of Step 6. By Lower Semicontinuity of the Torus Fisher Information and Closedness of the Score Along Couplings §lsc, μ∈PI(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). By Lower Semicontinuity of the Torus Fisher Information and Closedness of the Score Along Couplings §pairing, applied with η=∇φ(μ)∈Tμ\eta=\nabla\varphi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} and ηn=Fn∈L2(νn;Rd)\eta_{n}=F_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}), whose convergence along couplings was shown in Step 5, (⟨Fn,ξn⟩νn)n(\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}})_{n} converges to ⟨∇φ(μ),ξμ⟩μ\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\rangle_{\mu}. Together with Steps 4 and 6, the sequence

an:=ρ u(μn)+H(μn,pn)+σ22⟨Fn,ξn⟩νna_{n}:=\rho\,u(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}

converges to L:=ρ u(μ)+H(μ,∇φ(μ))+σ22⟨∇φ(μ),ξμ⟩μL:=\rho\,u(\mu)+H(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu))+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\rangle_{\mu}. As σ2δ4In≥0\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}\ge0, (5.2) gives an≤CKδa_{n}\le C_{K}\delta for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. Claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, applied to the tail (an0+n)n(a_{n_{0}+n})_{n}, which converges to LL by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit (with the strictly increasing sequence n↦n0+nn\mapsto n_{0}+n), and the constant sequence CKδC_{K}\delta, gives

ρ u(μ)+H(μ,∇φ(μ))+σ22⟨∇φ(μ),ξμ⟩μ≤CKδ≤δ c(∥∇φ(μ)∥μ).\rho\,u(\mu)+H\bigl(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)\bigr)+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\bigl\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\bigr\rangle_{\mu}\le C_{K}\delta\le\delta\,c\bigl(\lVert\nabla\varphi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}\bigr).

Since φ\varphi, δ\delta and μ\mu were arbitrary, uu is an entropy-penalised viscosity subsolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}), with the δ0\delta_{0} and cc of Step 0. This proves claim 1.

Step 8 (Supersolutions). Let vv be a lower semicontinuous viscosity supersolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}); we use the same δ0\delta_{0} and cc. Fix φ\varphi and δ\delta as in Step 2, and μ∈PEnt(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with G′(ν)>G′(μ)G'(\nu)>G'(\mu) for every ν∈PEnt(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) with ν≠μ\nu\ne\mu, where G′(ν):=v(ν)−φ(ν)+δ Ent(ν)G'(\nu):=v(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu). Steps 2 to 7 are repeated with the following changes, everything else being unchanged.

In Step 2, ψn:=φ∘Ssn−δ Ent∘Ssn\psi_{n}:=\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}}-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}}; by Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §linear with the coefficient −δ-\delta it is a Laplacian test function with gradient field gn−δhng^{n}-\delta h^{n}, so ∇ψn(μn)=pn−δzn\nabla\psi_{n}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}-\delta z_{n} and, by the same argument as for (2.1), Lψn(ν)=−⟨∇φ(Ssnν),ξSsnν⟩Ssnν+δ I(Ssnν)\mathcal{L}\psi_{n}(\nu)=-\langle\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu),\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}\rangle_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}+\delta\,\mathcal{I}(S_{s_{n}}\nu). The function v−ψnv-\psi_{n} is lower semicontinuous, and μn\mu_{n} is chosen as a minimiser of it by Step 1(a): v(ν)−ψn(ν)≥v(μn)−ψn(μn)v(\nu)-\psi_{n}(\nu)\ge v(\mu_{n})-\psi_{n}(\mu_{n}) for every ν\nu.

In Step 3, (3.1) becomes v(μn)−φ(νn)+δ Ent(νn)≤v(μ)−φ(Ssnμ)+δ Ent(Ssnμ)≤v(μ)−φ(Ssnμ)+δ Ent(μ)v(\mu_{n})-\varphi(\nu_{n})+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\le v(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s_{n}}\mu)\le v(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu), and with a real V≤vV\le v on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) (Step 1(a)) one gets Ent(νn)≤δ−1(v(μ)−V+m′−m)+Ent(μ)\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\le\delta^{-1}(v(\mu)-V+m'-m)+\mathrm{Ent}(\mu).

In Step 4, lower semicontinuity of vv at μˉ\bar\mu gives v(μmJ)>v(μˉ)−εv(\mu_{m_{J}})>v(\bar\mu)-\varepsilon, and with the same estimates for φ\varphi and Ent\mathrm{Ent} the modified (3.1) gives G′(μˉ)−(2+δ)ε<G′(μ)+εG'(\bar\mu)-(2+\delta)\varepsilon<G'(\mu)+\varepsilon; hence G′(μˉ)≤G′(μ)G'(\bar\mu)\le G'(\mu) and μˉ=μ\bar\mu=\mu by strict minimality. Then v(μn)>v(μ)−εv(\mu_{n})>v(\mu)-\varepsilon for large nn by lower semicontinuity, while the modified (3.1) gives v(μn)≤v(μ)−φ(Ssnμ)+φ(νn)+δ Ent(μ)−δ Ent(νn)<v(μ)+(2+δ)εv(\mu_{n})\le v(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\varphi(\nu_{n})+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})<v(\mu)+(2+\delta)\varepsilon; so (v(μn))(v(\mu_{n})) converges to v(μ)v(\mu).

In Step 5, Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §super applied to ψn\psi_{n} and the minimiser μn\mu_{n} gives

ρ v(μn)+H(μn,pn−δzn)+σ22⟨Fn,ξn⟩νn−σ2δ2 In≥0.\rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n}-\delta z_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{2}\,I_{n}\ge0.

The field −zn-z_{n} lies in TμnT_{\mu_{n}} by The Torus Tangent Space: Linearity of the Periodic Calculus, Closed Subspace, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §subspace and ∥−zn∥μn2=∥zn∥μn2≤In\lVert-z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}=\lVert z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}\le I_{n}, so the score-perturbation bound with ζ=−zn\zeta=-z_{n} gives H(μn,pn−δzn)≤H(μn,pn)+σ2δ4In+CKδH(\mu_{n},p_{n}-\delta z_{n})\le H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}+C_{K}\delta for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}, and therefore

ρ v(μn)+H(μn,pn)+σ22⟨Fn,ξn⟩νn−σ2δ4 In≥−CKδ(n≥n0).\rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\,I_{n}\ge-C_{K}\delta\qquad(n\ge n_{0}).

In Step 6, M≥0M\ge0 is chosen with CKδ+ρ v(μn)+H(μn,pn)≤MC_{K}\delta+\rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})\le M for every nn, and the last display gives σ2δ4In≤M+σ22BIn\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}\le M+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}B\sqrt{I_{n}}, that is a tn2≤M+b tna\,t_{n}^{2}\le M+b\,t_{n}, for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}; the bound In≤CI_{n}\le C follows as before.

In Step 7, since −σ2δ4In≤0-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}\le0, the sequence an:=ρ v(μn)+H(μn,pn)+σ22⟨Fn,ξn⟩νna_{n}:=\rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}} satisfies an≥−CKδa_{n}\ge-C_{K}\delta for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. As before, μ∈PI(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and (an)(a_{n}) converges to the left-hand side below, and claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, applied to the tail (an0+n)n(a_{n_{0}+n})_{n}, which converges to the same limit by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit (with the strictly increasing sequence n↦n0+nn\mapsto n_{0}+n), and the constant sequence −CKδ-C_{K}\delta, gives

ρ v(μ)+H(μ,∇φ(μ))+σ22⟨∇φ(μ),ξμ⟩μ≥−CKδ≥−δ c(∥∇φ(μ)∥μ).\rho\,v(\mu)+H\bigl(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)\bigr)+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\bigl\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\bigr\rangle_{\mu}\ge-C_{K}\delta\ge-\delta\,c\bigl(\lVert\nabla\varphi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}\bigr).

Hence vv is an entropy-penalised viscosity supersolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}), which proves claim 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…