Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Claim 1 is proved in Steps 0 to 7; Step 8 lists precisely what changes for claim 2. The choices are made in this order: the constants δ 0 \delta_{0} δ 0 , C R C_{R} C R and the function c c c (Step 0); then φ \varphi φ , δ \delta δ and μ \mu μ (Step 2); then the times s n s_{n} s n , the functions ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n and the maximisers μ n \mu_{n} μ n (Step 2); then the integer K K K and the index n 0 n_{0} n 0 (Step 5); then the constants B B B , M M M and C C C (Step 6).
Step 0 (Constants). Let δ 0 > 0 \delta_{0}>0 δ 0 > 0 and, for every real R > 0 R>0 R > 0 , C R ≥ 0 C_{R}\ge0 C R ≥ 0 be as in the score-perturbation bound . For a real r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 the set of integers k k k with 1 ≤ k ≤ r + 1 1\le k\le r+1 1 ≤ k ≤ r + 1 is finite and contains 1 1 1 ; let c ( r ) c(r) c ( r ) be the largest of the numbers C k C_{k} C k with k k k in this set. Then c ( r ) ≥ 0 c(r)\ge0 c ( r ) ≥ 0 , and c c c is nondecreasing on [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) , because for r ≤ r ′ r\le r' r ≤ r ′ the set belonging to r r r is contained in the set belonging to r ′ r' r ′ . We show that δ 0 \delta_{0} δ 0 and c c c have the property required in Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §sub (and, in Step 8, in Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §super ).
Step 1 (Three auxiliary facts). (a) By The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §metric and The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §compact , P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) is sequentially compact in the metric space ( P ( T d ) , W T ) (\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) ( P ( T d ) , W T ) , hence compact by A Sequentially Compact Subset of a Metric Space is Compact ; it is nonempty (the Dirac measure at the origin belongs to it, by Dirac Measures on Euclidean Space: Probability Measure, Integrals, Push-Forwards and the Coupling of Two Dirac Measures §measure and 0 ∈ Q 0\in Q 0 ∈ Q ). Hence every upper semicontinuous function on P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) attains a maximum, by claim 1 of Semicontinuous Functions Attain Their Extrema on a Compact Set ; every lower semicontinuous one attains a minimum, by claim 2 of that theorem; and every continuous one attains a minimum and a maximum, by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space .
(b) Let E E E be real, and let ( λ j ) j ∈ N (\lambda_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} ( λ j ) j ∈ N be a sequence in P E n t ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P Ent ( T d ) with E n t ( λ j ) ≤ E \mathrm{Ent}(\lambda_{j})\le E Ent ( λ j ) ≤ E for every j j j that converges to some λ ˉ \bar\lambda λ ˉ . Then λ ˉ ∈ P E n t ( T d ) \bar\lambda\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) λ ˉ ∈ P Ent ( T d ) by The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §closed , and for every real ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 there is J J J with E n t ( λ j ) > E n t ( λ ˉ ) − ε \mathrm{Ent}(\lambda_{j})>\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon Ent ( λ j ) > Ent ( λ ˉ ) − ε for every j ≥ J j\ge J j ≥ J . Indeed, otherwise the set of indices j j j with E n t ( λ j ) ≤ E n t ( λ ˉ ) − ε \mathrm{Ent}(\lambda_{j})\le\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon Ent ( λ j ) ≤ Ent ( λ ˉ ) − ε is infinite; listing it increasingly gives a subsequence of ( λ j ) (\lambda_{j}) ( λ j ) , which converges to λ ˉ \bar\lambda λ ˉ by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit , and The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §closed applied to it with the bound E n t ( λ ˉ ) − ε \mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon Ent ( λ ˉ ) − ε gives E n t ( λ ˉ ) ≤ E n t ( λ ˉ ) − ε \mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)\le\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\lambda)-\varepsilon Ent ( λ ˉ ) ≤ Ent ( λ ˉ ) − ε , which is absurd.
(c) Let ( λ n ) n ∈ N (\lambda_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( λ n ) n ∈ N converge to λ \lambda λ in P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) and let ( t n ) n ∈ N (t_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( t n ) n ∈ N be real numbers with 0 < t n ≤ 1 2 0<t_{n}\le\tfrac12 0 < t n ≤ 2 1 converging to 0 0 0 . By the triangle inequality for the metric W T W_{\mathbb{T}} W T (The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §metric ) and Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §distance ,
W T ( S t n λ n , λ ) ≤ W T ( S t n λ n , λ n ) + W T ( λ n , λ ) ≤ d t n + W T ( λ n , λ ) , W_{\mathbb{T}}(S_{t_{n}}\lambda_{n},\lambda)\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(S_{t_{n}}\lambda_{n},\lambda_{n})+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\lambda_{n},\lambda)\le\sqrt{d\,t_{n}}+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\lambda_{n},\lambda), W T ( S t n λ n , λ ) ≤ W T ( S t n λ n , λ n ) + W T ( λ n , λ ) ≤ d t n + W T ( λ n , λ ) ,
so ( S t n λ n ) n ∈ N (S_{t_{n}}\lambda_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( S t n λ n ) n ∈ N converges to λ \lambda λ .
Step 2 (Setup). Let u u u be an upper semicontinuous viscosity subsolution of ( E ) (\mathrm{E}) ( E ) . Fix an intrinsic test function φ \varphi φ on P a c ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ac ( T d ) , a real δ \delta δ with 0 < δ ≤ δ 0 0<\delta\le\delta_{0} 0 < δ ≤ δ 0 , and μ ∈ P E n t ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P Ent ( T d ) with G ( ν ) < G ( μ ) G(\nu)<G(\mu) G ( ν ) < G ( μ ) for every ν ∈ P E n t ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P Ent ( T d ) with ν ≠ μ \nu\ne\mu ν = μ , where
G ( ν ) : = u ( ν ) − φ ( ν ) − δ E n t ( ν ) ( ν ∈ P E n t ( T d ) ) . G(\nu):=u(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu)\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})). G ( ν ) := u ( ν ) − φ ( ν ) − δ Ent ( ν ) ( ν ∈ P Ent ( T d )) .
The measure μ \mu μ is absolutely continuous by The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §nonnegative , so ∇ φ ( μ ) ∈ T μ \nabla\varphi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} ∇ φ ( μ ) ∈ T μ by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability ; put r : = ∥ ∇ φ ( μ ) ∥ μ r:=\lVert\nabla\varphi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu} r := ∥ ∇ φ ( μ ) ∥ μ . The function φ \varphi φ is continuous on P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity .
For n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N put s n : = 1 / ( 2 ( n + 1 ) ) s_{n}:=1/(2(n+1)) s n := 1/ ( 2 ( n + 1 )) , so that 0 < s n ≤ 1 2 0<s_{n}\le\tfrac12 0 < s n ≤ 2 1 and ( s n ) (s_{n}) ( s n ) converges to 0 0 0 , and
ψ n : = φ ∘ S s n + δ E n t ∘ S s n . \psi_{n}:=\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}}+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}}. ψ n := φ ∘ S s n + δ Ent ∘ S s n .
By Heat Regularisation of an Intrinsic Test Function: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Pairing of the Gradient with the Score §test and Heat Regularisation of the Entropy: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Fisher Information §test , φ ∘ S s n \varphi\circ S_{s_{n}} φ ∘ S s n and E n t ∘ S s n \mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}} Ent ∘ S s n are Laplacian test functions, with gradient fields g n ( ν , x ) : = A s n ν ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) ( x ) g^{n}(\nu,x):=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu)(x) g n ( ν , x ) := A s n ν ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) ( x ) and h n ( ν , x ) : = A s n ν ξ S s n ν ( x ) h^{n}(\nu,x):=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}(x) h n ( ν , x ) := A s n ν ξ S s n ν ( x ) respectively, and ∇ ( φ ∘ S s n ) ( ν ) = A s n ν ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) \nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}})(\nu)=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu) ∇ ( φ ∘ S s n ) ( ν ) = A s n ν ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) and ∇ ( E n t ∘ S s n ) ( ν ) = A s n ν ξ S s n ν \nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}})(\nu)=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu} ∇ ( Ent ∘ S s n ) ( ν ) = A s n ν ξ S s n ν for every ν ∈ P ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P ( T d ) . Both are intrinsic test functions on P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) by Gradient Fields and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test . By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §linear , ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n is a Laplacian test function with gradient field g n + δ h n g^{n}+\delta h^{n} g n + δ h n , and
∇ ψ n ( ν ) = A s n ν ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) + δ A s n ν ξ S s n ν ( ν ∈ P ( T d ) ) . \nabla\psi_{n}(\nu)=A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu)+\delta\,A^{\nu}_{s_{n}}\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d})). ∇ ψ n ( ν ) = A s n ν ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) + δ A s n ν ξ S s n ν ( ν ∈ P ( T d )) .
By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §unique , g n + δ h n g^{n}+\delta h^{n} g n + δ h n , g n g^{n} g n and h n h^{n} h n are the gradient fields of ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n , φ ∘ S s n \varphi\circ S_{s_{n}} φ ∘ S s n and E n t ∘ S s n \mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}} Ent ∘ S s n used in The Laplacian of a Laplacian Test Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space §laplacian . Since each partial derivative of a component of g n ( ν , ⋅ ) + δ h n ( ν , ⋅ ) g^{n}(\nu,\cdot)+\delta h^{n}(\nu,\cdot) g n ( ν , ⋅ ) + δ h n ( ν , ⋅ ) is the corresponding combination of partial derivatives, and the integral is linear (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral ), that definition gives L ψ n = L ( φ ∘ S s n ) + δ L ( E n t ∘ S s n ) \mathcal{L}\psi_{n}=\mathcal{L}(\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}})+\delta\,\mathcal{L}(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}}) L ψ n = L ( φ ∘ S s n ) + δ L ( Ent ∘ S s n ) ; so Heat Regularisation of an Intrinsic Test Function: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Pairing of the Gradient with the Score §laplacian and Heat Regularisation of the Entropy: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Fisher Information §laplacian yield, for every ν ∈ P ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P ( T d ) ,
L ψ n ( ν ) = − ⟨ ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) , ξ S s n ν ⟩ S s n ν − δ I ( S s n ν ) . ( 2.1 ) \mathcal{L}\psi_{n}(\nu)=-\bigl\langle\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu),\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}\bigr\rangle_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}-\delta\,\mathcal{I}(S_{s_{n}}\nu).\qquad(2.1) L ψ n ( ν ) = − ⟨ ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) , ξ S s n ν ⟩ S s n ν − δ I ( S s n ν ) . ( 2.1 )
The function ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n is continuous by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity , so u − ψ n u-\psi_{n} u − ψ n is upper semicontinuous (at a point, given ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 , take the smaller of the radii provided by the upper semicontinuity of u u u and the continuity of ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n , each for ε / 2 \varepsilon/2 ε /2 ). By Step 1(a) we may choose μ n ∈ P ( T d ) \mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ n ∈ P ( T d ) with u ( ν ) − ψ n ( ν ) ≤ u ( μ n ) − ψ n ( μ n ) u(\nu)-\psi_{n}(\nu)\le u(\mu_{n})-\psi_{n}(\mu_{n}) u ( ν ) − ψ n ( ν ) ≤ u ( μ n ) − ψ n ( μ n ) for every ν ∈ P ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P ( T d ) .
Notation: ν n : = S s n μ n \nu_{n}:=S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} ν n := S s n μ n , which lies in P a c ( T d ) ∩ P I ( T d ) ∩ P E n t ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\cap\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\cap\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ac ( T d ) ∩ P I ( T d ) ∩ P Ent ( T d ) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures ; F n : = ∇ φ ( ν n ) ∈ T ν n F_{n}:=\nabla\varphi(\nu_{n})\in T_{\nu_{n}} F n := ∇ φ ( ν n ) ∈ T ν n ; ξ n : = ξ ν n \xi_{n}:=\xi_{\nu_{n}} ξ n := ξ ν n ; I n : = I ( ν n ) = ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n 2 I_{n}:=\mathcal{I}(\nu_{n})=\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2} I n := I ( ν n ) = ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n 2 by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information ; p n : = A s n μ n F n p_{n}:=A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}F_{n} p n := A s n μ n F n and z n : = A s n μ n ξ n z_{n}:=A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}\xi_{n} z n := A s n μ n ξ n . Thus p n = ∇ ( φ ∘ S s n ) ( μ n ) p_{n}=\nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}})(\mu_{n}) p n = ∇ ( φ ∘ S s n ) ( μ n ) and z n = ∇ ( E n t ∘ S s n ) ( μ n ) z_{n}=\nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}})(\mu_{n}) z n = ∇ ( Ent ∘ S s n ) ( μ n ) , both in T μ n T_{\mu_{n}} T μ n by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability , and ∇ ψ n ( μ n ) = p n + δ z n \nabla\psi_{n}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}+\delta z_{n} ∇ ψ n ( μ n ) = p n + δ z n .
Step 3 (Comparison with μ \mu μ and an entropy bound). Taking ν = μ \nu=\mu ν = μ in the maximality of μ n \mu_{n} μ n , and using E n t ( S s n μ ) ≤ E n t ( μ ) \mathrm{Ent}(S_{s_{n}}\mu)\le\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) Ent ( S s n μ ) ≤ Ent ( μ ) from Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §entropy together with δ > 0 \delta>0 δ > 0 ,
u ( μ n ) − φ ( ν n ) − δ E n t ( ν n ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) − δ E n t ( S s n μ ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) − δ E n t ( μ ) . ( 3.1 ) u(\mu_{n})-\varphi(\nu_{n})-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s_{n}}\mu)\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu).\qquad(3.1) u ( μ n ) − φ ( ν n ) − δ Ent ( ν n ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) − δ Ent ( S s n μ ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) − δ Ent ( μ ) . ( 3.1 )
By Step 1(a) there are reals U U U , m m m , m ′ m' m ′ with u ≤ U u\le U u ≤ U and m ≤ φ ≤ m ′ m\le\varphi\le m' m ≤ φ ≤ m ′ on P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) . Then (3.1) gives E n t ( ν n ) ≤ E : = δ − 1 ( U − m − u ( μ ) + m ′ ) + E n t ( μ ) \mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\le E:=\delta^{-1}\bigl(U-m-u(\mu)+m'\bigr)+\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) Ent ( ν n ) ≤ E := δ − 1 ( U − m − u ( μ ) + m ′ ) + Ent ( μ ) for every n n n .
Step 4 (μ n → μ \mu_{n}\to\mu μ n → μ and u ( μ n ) → u ( μ ) u(\mu_{n})\to u(\mu) u ( μ n ) → u ( μ ) ). First, every subsequence ( μ n k ) k ∈ N (\mu_{n_{k}})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} ( μ n k ) k ∈ N has a further subsequence converging to μ \mu μ . By Step 1(a) there are a strictly increasing ( k j ) j ∈ N (k_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} ( k j ) j ∈ N and μ ˉ \bar\mu μ ˉ with ( μ n k j ) j (\mu_{n_{k_{j}}})_{j} ( μ n k j ) j converging to μ ˉ \bar\mu μ ˉ . Put m j : = n k j m_{j}:=n_{k_{j}} m j := n k j ; this is strictly increasing by claim 2 of A Subsequence of a Subsequence is a Subsequence , so m j ≥ j m_{j}\ge j m j ≥ j and ( s m j ) j (s_{m_{j}})_{j} ( s m j ) j converges to 0 0 0 . By Step 1(c), ( ν m j ) j (\nu_{m_{j}})_{j} ( ν m j ) j converges to μ ˉ \bar\mu μ ˉ and ( S s m j μ ) j (S_{s_{m_{j}}}\mu)_{j} ( S s m j μ ) j converges to μ \mu μ . By Step 1(b) with the bound E E E of Step 3, μ ˉ ∈ P E n t ( T d ) \bar\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ˉ ∈ P Ent ( T d ) . Let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 . By the upper semicontinuity of u u u at μ ˉ \bar\mu μ ˉ , the continuity of φ \varphi φ at μ ˉ \bar\mu μ ˉ and at μ \mu μ , and Step 1(b), there is J J J such that u ( μ m J ) < u ( μ ˉ ) + ε u(\mu_{m_{J}})<u(\bar\mu)+\varepsilon u ( μ m J ) < u ( μ ˉ ) + ε , φ ( ν m J ) > φ ( μ ˉ ) − ε \varphi(\nu_{m_{J}})>\varphi(\bar\mu)-\varepsilon φ ( ν m J ) > φ ( μ ˉ ) − ε , φ ( S s m J μ ) < φ ( μ ) + ε \varphi(S_{s_{m_{J}}}\mu)<\varphi(\mu)+\varepsilon φ ( S s m J μ ) < φ ( μ ) + ε and E n t ( ν m J ) > E n t ( μ ˉ ) − ε \mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{m_{J}})>\mathrm{Ent}(\bar\mu)-\varepsilon Ent ( ν m J ) > Ent ( μ ˉ ) − ε . Inserting these into (3.1) with n = m J n=m_{J} n = m J ,
G ( μ ˉ ) + ( 2 + δ ) ε > u ( μ m J ) − φ ( ν m J ) − δ E n t ( ν m J ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s m J μ ) − δ E n t ( μ ) > G ( μ ) − ε . G(\bar\mu)+(2+\delta)\varepsilon>u(\mu_{m_{J}})-\varphi(\nu_{m_{J}})-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{m_{J}})\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{m_{J}}}\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)>G(\mu)-\varepsilon. G ( μ ˉ ) + ( 2 + δ ) ε > u ( μ m J ) − φ ( ν m J ) − δ Ent ( ν m J ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s m J μ ) − δ Ent ( μ ) > G ( μ ) − ε .
As ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 is arbitrary, G ( μ ˉ ) ≥ G ( μ ) G(\bar\mu)\ge G(\mu) G ( μ ˉ ) ≥ G ( μ ) , so μ ˉ = μ \bar\mu=\mu μ ˉ = μ by the strict maximality of μ \mu μ .
Now suppose that ( μ n ) (\mu_{n}) ( μ n ) did not converge to μ \mu μ . Then there are a real ε 0 > 0 \varepsilon_{0}>0 ε 0 > 0 and infinitely many n n n with W T ( μ n , μ ) ≥ ε 0 W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\ge\varepsilon_{0} W T ( μ n , μ ) ≥ ε 0 ; listing them increasingly gives a subsequence no further subsequence of which converges to μ \mu μ , contradicting the previous paragraph. Hence ( μ n ) (\mu_{n}) ( μ n ) converges to μ \mu μ , and by Step 1(c) so do ( ν n ) (\nu_{n}) ( ν n ) and ( S s n μ ) (S_{s_{n}}\mu) ( S s n μ ) .
Let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 . By the upper semicontinuity of u u u at μ \mu μ , the continuity of φ \varphi φ at μ \mu μ , and Step 1(b) applied to ( ν n ) (\nu_{n}) ( ν n ) with the bound E E E , there is N N N such that for every n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N : u ( μ n ) < u ( μ ) + ε u(\mu_{n})<u(\mu)+\varepsilon u ( μ n ) < u ( μ ) + ε , ∣ φ ( ν n ) − φ ( μ ) ∣ < ε |\varphi(\nu_{n})-\varphi(\mu)|<\varepsilon ∣ φ ( ν n ) − φ ( μ ) ∣ < ε , ∣ φ ( S s n μ ) − φ ( μ ) ∣ < ε |\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)-\varphi(\mu)|<\varepsilon ∣ φ ( S s n μ ) − φ ( μ ) ∣ < ε and E n t ( ν n ) > E n t ( μ ) − ε \mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})>\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)-\varepsilon Ent ( ν n ) > Ent ( μ ) − ε . Then (3.1) gives
u ( μ n ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + φ ( ν n ) − δ E n t ( μ ) + δ E n t ( ν n ) > u ( μ ) − ( 2 + δ ) ε , u(\mu_{n})\ge u(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\varphi(\nu_{n})-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})>u(\mu)-(2+\delta)\varepsilon, u ( μ n ) ≥ u ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + φ ( ν n ) − δ Ent ( μ ) + δ Ent ( ν n ) > u ( μ ) − ( 2 + δ ) ε ,
so ∣ u ( μ n ) − u ( μ ) ∣ < ( 2 + δ ) ε |u(\mu_{n})-u(\mu)|<(2+\delta)\varepsilon ∣ u ( μ n ) − u ( μ ) ∣ < ( 2 + δ ) ε for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N . Hence ( u ( μ n ) ) (u(\mu_{n})) ( u ( μ n )) converges to u ( μ ) u(\mu) u ( μ ) .
Step 5 (The viscosity inequality at μ n \mu_{n} μ n and the score perturbation). Since ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n is a Laplacian test function and μ n \mu_{n} μ n maximises u − ψ n u-\psi_{n} u − ψ n over P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) , Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §sub applies to ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n and μ n \mu_{n} μ n ; with ∇ ψ n ( μ n ) = p n + δ z n \nabla\psi_{n}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}+\delta z_{n} ∇ ψ n ( μ n ) = p n + δ z n and (2.1) at ν = μ n \nu=\mu_{n} ν = μ n it gives
ρ u ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n + δ z n ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n + σ 2 δ 2 I n ≤ 0. ( 5.1 ) \rho\,u(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n}+\delta z_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{2}\,I_{n}\le0.\qquad(5.1) ρ u ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n + δ z n ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n + 2 σ 2 δ I n ≤ 0. ( 5.1 )
Since μ ∈ P a c ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ac ( T d ) , ( μ n ) (\mu_{n}) ( μ n ) converges to μ \mu μ and ( s n ) (s_{n}) ( s n ) converges to 0 0 0 , Heat Regularisation of an Intrinsic Test Function: a Laplacian Test Function whose Laplacian is Minus the Pairing of the Gradient with the Score §convergence shows that ( ( ν n , F n ) ) n ((\nu_{n},F_{n}))_{n} (( ν n , F n ) ) n and ( ( μ n , p n ) ) n ((\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n} (( μ n , p n ) ) n both converge along couplings to ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) (\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)) ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ )) . Let γ n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) \gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) γ n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) be couplings as in that definition for the second sequence. On the probability space ( R d + d , γ n ) (\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\gamma_{n}) ( R d + d , γ n ) the maps X n : = p n ∘ p r 1 X_{n}:=p_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} X n := p n ∘ pr 1 and Y : = ∇ φ ( μ ) ∘ p r 2 Y:=\nabla\varphi(\mu)\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} Y := ∇ φ ( μ ) ∘ pr 2 (Borel representatives) are square-integrable with norms ∥ p n ∥ μ n \lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}} ∥ p n ∥ μ n and r r r , by the change-of-variables formula , the marginals of γ n \gamma_{n} γ n being μ n \mu_{n} μ n and μ \mu μ ; and ∥ X n − Y ∥ 2 = D γ n ( p n , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) \lVert X_{n}-Y\rVert^{2}=D_{\gamma_{n}}(p_{n},\nabla\varphi(\mu)) ∥ X n − Y ∥ 2 = D γ n ( p n , ∇ φ ( μ )) . The triangle inequality for the norm of the real Hilbert space L 2 ( R d + d ; R d ) L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d};\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( R d + d ; R d ) over γ n \gamma_{n} γ n (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors is a Real Hilbert Space; Its Laws Have Finite Second Moment; Constants and Translations §hilbert ) gives ∣ ∥ p n ∥ μ n − r ∣ ≤ D γ n ( p n , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) 1 / 2 \bigl|\lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}-r\bigr|\le D_{\gamma_{n}}(p_{n},\nabla\varphi(\mu))^{1/2} ∥ p n ∥ μ n − r ≤ D γ n ( p n , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) 1/2 , which converges to 0 0 0 . Hence ( ∥ p n ∥ μ n ) (\lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}) (∥ p n ∥ μ n ) converges to r r r , and in the same way ( ∥ F n ∥ ν n ) (\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}) (∥ F n ∥ ν n ) converges to r r r .
Let K K K be the least positive integer with K > r K>r K > r . Then K ≤ r + 1 K\le r+1 K ≤ r + 1 (if K ≥ 2 K\ge2 K ≥ 2 , then K − 1 K-1 K − 1 is a positive integer that is not larger than r r r ), so C K ≤ c ( r ) C_{K}\le c(r) C K ≤ c ( r ) by Step 0. Since r < K r<K r < K , there is n 0 n_{0} n 0 with ∥ p n ∥ μ n ≤ K \lVert p_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}\le K ∥ p n ∥ μ n ≤ K for every n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 .
The score ξ n \xi_{n} ξ n has a Borel representative R d → R d \mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} R d → R d that is square-integrable with respect to ν n = S s n μ n \nu_{n}=S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} ν n = S s n μ n , so Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average gives ∥ z n ∥ μ n 2 ≤ ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n 2 = I n \lVert z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}\le\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2}=I_{n} ∥ z n ∥ μ n 2 ≤ ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n 2 = I n . For n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 the score-perturbation bound , applied with μ n \mu_{n} μ n , p = p n p=p_{n} p = p n , ζ = z n \zeta=z_{n} ζ = z n , R = K R=K R = K and δ \delta δ , gives
H ( μ n , p n + δ z n ) ≥ H ( μ n , p n ) − σ 2 δ 4 ∥ z n ∥ μ n 2 − C K δ ≥ H ( μ n , p n ) − σ 2 δ 4 I n − C K δ , H(\mu_{n},p_{n}+\delta z_{n})\ge H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\lVert z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}-C_{K}\delta\ge H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}-C_{K}\delta, H ( μ n , p n + δ z n ) ≥ H ( μ n , p n ) − 4 σ 2 δ ∥ z n ∥ μ n 2 − C K δ ≥ H ( μ n , p n ) − 4 σ 2 δ I n − C K δ ,
and with (5.1), for every n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 ,
ρ u ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n + σ 2 δ 4 I n ≤ C K δ . ( 5.2 ) \rho\,u(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\,I_{n}\le C_{K}\delta.\qquad(5.2) ρ u ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n + 4 σ 2 δ I n ≤ C K δ . ( 5.2 )
Step 6 (A uniform bound on the Fisher information). Since p n ∈ T μ n p_{n}\in T_{\mu_{n}} p n ∈ T μ n , ∇ φ ( μ ) ∈ T μ \nabla\varphi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} ∇ φ ( μ ) ∈ T μ and ( ( μ n , p n ) ) n ((\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n} (( μ n , p n ) ) n converges along couplings to ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) (\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)) ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ )) , the continuity of H H H along couplings shows that ( H ( μ n , p n ) ) n (H(\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n} ( H ( μ n , p n ) ) n converges to H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) H(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)) H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ )) . The real sequences ( u ( μ n ) ) (u(\mu_{n})) ( u ( μ n )) , ( H ( μ n , p n ) ) (H(\mu_{n},p_{n})) ( H ( μ n , p n )) and ( ∥ F n ∥ ν n ) (\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}) (∥ F n ∥ ν n ) converge (Step 4, the previous sentence and Step 5), hence are bounded (claim 2 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences ); choose reals B ≥ 0 B\ge0 B ≥ 0 and M ≥ 0 M\ge0 M ≥ 0 with ∥ F n ∥ ν n ≤ B \lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le B ∥ F n ∥ ν n ≤ B and C K δ − ρ u ( μ n ) − H ( μ n , p n ) ≤ M C_{K}\delta-\rho\,u(\mu_{n})-H(\mu_{n},p_{n})\le M C K δ − ρ u ( μ n ) − H ( μ n , p n ) ≤ M for every n n n . By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the real Hilbert space L 2 ( ν n ; R d ) L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( ν n ; R d ) (Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space ), ∣ ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n ∣ ≤ B I n |\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}|\le B\sqrt{I_{n}} ∣ ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n ∣ ≤ B I n . Put a : = σ 2 δ / 4 > 0 a:=\sigma^{2}\delta/4>0 a := σ 2 δ /4 > 0 , b : = σ 2 B / 2 b:=\sigma^{2}B/2 b := σ 2 B /2 and t n : = I n t_{n}:=\sqrt{I_{n}} t n := I n . Then (5.2) gives a t n 2 ≤ M + b t n a\,t_{n}^{2}\le M+b\,t_{n} a t n 2 ≤ M + b t n for n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 . If t n > 2 b / a t_{n}>2b/a t n > 2 b / a , then b t n < a t n 2 / 2 b\,t_{n}<a\,t_{n}^{2}/2 b t n < a t n 2 /2 , whence a t n 2 / 2 < M a\,t_{n}^{2}/2<M a t n 2 /2 < M ; so in all cases I n = t n 2 ≤ max { 4 b 2 / a 2 , 2 M / a } I_{n}=t_{n}^{2}\le\max\{4b^{2}/a^{2},\,2M/a\} I n = t n 2 ≤ max { 4 b 2 / a 2 , 2 M / a } for n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 . Let C C C be the largest of max { 4 b 2 / a 2 , 2 M / a } \max\{4b^{2}/a^{2},2M/a\} max { 4 b 2 / a 2 , 2 M / a } and I 0 , … , I n 0 − 1 I_{0},\dots,I_{n_{0}-1} I 0 , … , I n 0 − 1 ; then I n ≤ C I_{n}\le C I n ≤ C for every n n n .
Step 7 (Passage to the limit). Apply Lower Semicontinuity of the Torus Fisher Information and Closedness of the Score Along Couplings to the sequence ( ν n ) (\nu_{n}) ( ν n ) in P I ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P I ( T d ) , which converges to μ \mu μ (Step 4), with the bound C C C of Step 6. By Lower Semicontinuity of the Torus Fisher Information and Closedness of the Score Along Couplings §lsc , μ ∈ P I ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P I ( T d ) . By Lower Semicontinuity of the Torus Fisher Information and Closedness of the Score Along Couplings §pairing , applied with η = ∇ φ ( μ ) ∈ T μ \eta=\nabla\varphi(\mu)\in T_{\mu} η = ∇ φ ( μ ) ∈ T μ and η n = F n ∈ L 2 ( ν n ; R d ) \eta_{n}=F_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) η n = F n ∈ L 2 ( ν n ; R d ) , whose convergence along couplings was shown in Step 5, ( ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n ) n (\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}})_{n} (⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n ) n converges to ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ \langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\rangle_{\mu} ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ . Together with Steps 4 and 6, the sequence
a n : = ρ u ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n a_{n}:=\rho\,u(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}} a n := ρ u ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n
converges to L : = ρ u ( μ ) + H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ L:=\rho\,u(\mu)+H(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu))+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\rangle_{\mu} L := ρ u ( μ ) + H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ )) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ . As σ 2 δ 4 I n ≥ 0 \frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}\ge0 4 σ 2 δ I n ≥ 0 , (5.2) gives a n ≤ C K δ a_{n}\le C_{K}\delta a n ≤ C K δ for n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 . Claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences , applied to the tail ( a n 0 + n ) n (a_{n_{0}+n})_{n} ( a n 0 + n ) n , which converges to L L L by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit (with the strictly increasing sequence n ↦ n 0 + n n\mapsto n_{0}+n n ↦ n 0 + n ), and the constant sequence C K δ C_{K}\delta C K δ , gives
ρ u ( μ ) + H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ ≤ C K δ ≤ δ c ( ∥ ∇ φ ( μ ) ∥ μ ) . \rho\,u(\mu)+H\bigl(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)\bigr)+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\bigl\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\bigr\rangle_{\mu}\le C_{K}\delta\le\delta\,c\bigl(\lVert\nabla\varphi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}\bigr). ρ u ( μ ) + H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ ≤ C K δ ≤ δ c ( ∥ ∇ φ ( μ ) ∥ μ ) .
Since φ \varphi φ , δ \delta δ and μ \mu μ were arbitrary, u u u is an entropy-penalised viscosity subsolution of ( E ) (\mathrm{E}) ( E ) , with the δ 0 \delta_{0} δ 0 and c c c of Step 0. This proves claim 1.
Step 8 (Supersolutions). Let v v v be a lower semicontinuous viscosity supersolution of ( E ) (\mathrm{E}) ( E ) ; we use the same δ 0 \delta_{0} δ 0 and c c c . Fix φ \varphi φ and δ \delta δ as in Step 2, and μ ∈ P E n t ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P Ent ( T d ) with G ′ ( ν ) > G ′ ( μ ) G'(\nu)>G'(\mu) G ′ ( ν ) > G ′ ( μ ) for every ν ∈ P E n t ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P Ent ( T d ) with ν ≠ μ \nu\ne\mu ν = μ , where G ′ ( ν ) : = v ( ν ) − φ ( ν ) + δ E n t ( ν ) G'(\nu):=v(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu) G ′ ( ν ) := v ( ν ) − φ ( ν ) + δ Ent ( ν ) . Steps 2 to 7 are repeated with the following changes, everything else being unchanged.
In Step 2, ψ n : = φ ∘ S s n − δ E n t ∘ S s n \psi_{n}:=\varphi\circ S_{s_{n}}-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s_{n}} ψ n := φ ∘ S s n − δ Ent ∘ S s n ; by Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §linear with the coefficient − δ -\delta − δ it is a Laplacian test function with gradient field g n − δ h n g^{n}-\delta h^{n} g n − δ h n , so ∇ ψ n ( μ n ) = p n − δ z n \nabla\psi_{n}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}-\delta z_{n} ∇ ψ n ( μ n ) = p n − δ z n and, by the same argument as for (2.1), L ψ n ( ν ) = − ⟨ ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) , ξ S s n ν ⟩ S s n ν + δ I ( S s n ν ) \mathcal{L}\psi_{n}(\nu)=-\langle\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\nu),\xi_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}\rangle_{S_{s_{n}}\nu}+\delta\,\mathcal{I}(S_{s_{n}}\nu) L ψ n ( ν ) = − ⟨ ∇ φ ( S s n ν ) , ξ S s n ν ⟩ S s n ν + δ I ( S s n ν ) . The function v − ψ n v-\psi_{n} v − ψ n is lower semicontinuous, and μ n \mu_{n} μ n is chosen as a minimiser of it by Step 1(a): v ( ν ) − ψ n ( ν ) ≥ v ( μ n ) − ψ n ( μ n ) v(\nu)-\psi_{n}(\nu)\ge v(\mu_{n})-\psi_{n}(\mu_{n}) v ( ν ) − ψ n ( ν ) ≥ v ( μ n ) − ψ n ( μ n ) for every ν \nu ν .
In Step 3, (3.1) becomes v ( μ n ) − φ ( ν n ) + δ E n t ( ν n ) ≤ v ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + δ E n t ( S s n μ ) ≤ v ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + δ E n t ( μ ) v(\mu_{n})-\varphi(\nu_{n})+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\le v(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s_{n}}\mu)\le v(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) v ( μ n ) − φ ( ν n ) + δ Ent ( ν n ) ≤ v ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + δ Ent ( S s n μ ) ≤ v ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + δ Ent ( μ ) , and with a real V ≤ v V\le v V ≤ v on P ( T d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ( T d ) (Step 1(a)) one gets E n t ( ν n ) ≤ δ − 1 ( v ( μ ) − V + m ′ − m ) + E n t ( μ ) \mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})\le\delta^{-1}(v(\mu)-V+m'-m)+\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) Ent ( ν n ) ≤ δ − 1 ( v ( μ ) − V + m ′ − m ) + Ent ( μ ) .
In Step 4, lower semicontinuity of v v v at μ ˉ \bar\mu μ ˉ gives v ( μ m J ) > v ( μ ˉ ) − ε v(\mu_{m_{J}})>v(\bar\mu)-\varepsilon v ( μ m J ) > v ( μ ˉ ) − ε , and with the same estimates for φ \varphi φ and E n t \mathrm{Ent} Ent the modified (3.1) gives G ′ ( μ ˉ ) − ( 2 + δ ) ε < G ′ ( μ ) + ε G'(\bar\mu)-(2+\delta)\varepsilon<G'(\mu)+\varepsilon G ′ ( μ ˉ ) − ( 2 + δ ) ε < G ′ ( μ ) + ε ; hence G ′ ( μ ˉ ) ≤ G ′ ( μ ) G'(\bar\mu)\le G'(\mu) G ′ ( μ ˉ ) ≤ G ′ ( μ ) and μ ˉ = μ \bar\mu=\mu μ ˉ = μ by strict minimality. Then v ( μ n ) > v ( μ ) − ε v(\mu_{n})>v(\mu)-\varepsilon v ( μ n ) > v ( μ ) − ε for large n n n by lower semicontinuity, while the modified (3.1) gives v ( μ n ) ≤ v ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + φ ( ν n ) + δ E n t ( μ ) − δ E n t ( ν n ) < v ( μ ) + ( 2 + δ ) ε v(\mu_{n})\le v(\mu)-\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu)+\varphi(\nu_{n})+\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)-\delta\,\mathrm{Ent}(\nu_{n})<v(\mu)+(2+\delta)\varepsilon v ( μ n ) ≤ v ( μ ) − φ ( S s n μ ) + φ ( ν n ) + δ Ent ( μ ) − δ Ent ( ν n ) < v ( μ ) + ( 2 + δ ) ε ; so ( v ( μ n ) ) (v(\mu_{n})) ( v ( μ n )) converges to v ( μ ) v(\mu) v ( μ ) .
In Step 5, Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §super applied to ψ n \psi_{n} ψ n and the minimiser μ n \mu_{n} μ n gives
ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n − δ z n ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − σ 2 δ 2 I n ≥ 0. \rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n}-\delta z_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{2}\,I_{n}\ge0. ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n − δ z n ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − 2 σ 2 δ I n ≥ 0.
The field − z n -z_{n} − z n lies in T μ n T_{\mu_{n}} T μ n by The Torus Tangent Space: Linearity of the Periodic Calculus, Closed Subspace, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §subspace and ∥ − z n ∥ μ n 2 = ∥ z n ∥ μ n 2 ≤ I n \lVert-z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}=\lVert z_{n}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}\le I_{n} ∥ − z n ∥ μ n 2 = ∥ z n ∥ μ n 2 ≤ I n , so the score-perturbation bound with ζ = − z n \zeta=-z_{n} ζ = − z n gives H ( μ n , p n − δ z n ) ≤ H ( μ n , p n ) + σ 2 δ 4 I n + C K δ H(\mu_{n},p_{n}-\delta z_{n})\le H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}+C_{K}\delta H ( μ n , p n − δ z n ) ≤ H ( μ n , p n ) + 4 σ 2 δ I n + C K δ for n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 , and therefore
ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − σ 2 δ 4 I n ≥ − C K δ ( n ≥ n 0 ) . \rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\,I_{n}\ge-C_{K}\delta\qquad(n\ge n_{0}). ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − 4 σ 2 δ I n ≥ − C K δ ( n ≥ n 0 ) .
In Step 6, M ≥ 0 M\ge0 M ≥ 0 is chosen with C K δ + ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) ≤ M C_{K}\delta+\rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})\le M C K δ + ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) ≤ M for every n n n , and the last display gives σ 2 δ 4 I n ≤ M + σ 2 2 B I n \frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}\le M+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}B\sqrt{I_{n}} 4 σ 2 δ I n ≤ M + 2 σ 2 B I n , that is a t n 2 ≤ M + b t n a\,t_{n}^{2}\le M+b\,t_{n} a t n 2 ≤ M + b t n , for n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 ; the bound I n ≤ C I_{n}\le C I n ≤ C follows as before.
In Step 7, since − σ 2 δ 4 I n ≤ 0 -\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}I_{n}\le0 − 4 σ 2 δ I n ≤ 0 , the sequence a n : = ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n a_{n}:=\rho\,v(\mu_{n})+H(\mu_{n},p_{n})+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\langle F_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}} a n := ρ v ( μ n ) + H ( μ n , p n ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ F n , ξ n ⟩ ν n satisfies a n ≥ − C K δ a_{n}\ge-C_{K}\delta a n ≥ − C K δ for n ≥ n 0 n\ge n_{0} n ≥ n 0 . As before, μ ∈ P I ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P I ( T d ) and ( a n ) (a_{n}) ( a n ) converges to the left-hand side below, and claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences , applied to the tail ( a n 0 + n ) n (a_{n_{0}+n})_{n} ( a n 0 + n ) n , which converges to the same limit by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit (with the strictly increasing sequence n ↦ n 0 + n n\mapsto n_{0}+n n ↦ n 0 + n ), and the constant sequence − C K δ -C_{K}\delta − C K δ , gives
ρ v ( μ ) + H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) + σ 2 2 ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ ≥ − C K δ ≥ − δ c ( ∥ ∇ φ ( μ ) ∥ μ ) . \rho\,v(\mu)+H\bigl(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)\bigr)+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\bigl\langle\nabla\varphi(\mu),\xi_{\mu}\bigr\rangle_{\mu}\ge-C_{K}\delta\ge-\delta\,c\bigl(\lVert\nabla\varphi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}\bigr). ρ v ( μ ) + H ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) + 2 σ 2 ⟨ ∇ φ ( μ ) , ξ μ ⟩ μ ≥ − C K δ ≥ − δ c ( ∥ ∇ φ ( μ ) ∥ μ ) .
Hence v v v is an entropy-penalised viscosity supersolution of ( E ) (\mathrm{E}) ( E ) , which proves claim 2.