TheoremBase

Proof of The Upper Semicontinuous Envelope of a Supremum of Viscosity Subsolutions is a Viscosity Subsolution

lemmalem:sup-of-subsolutions-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 14,547 chars · 38 deps · depth 23 Reason: First publication of the proof: the quartic bump makes the touching maximum strict on a compact ball, almost maximising members of the family are maximised over that ball, the subsequence criterion identifies the limit of the maximisers, and the viscosity inequalities pass to the limit.

The quartic bump makes the touching maximum strict on a small closed ball. Almost maximising members of the family at points where the supremum is almost attained are maximised over that ball; strictness forces every subsequence of the maximisers to have a further subsequence converging to the touching point, so the whole sequence does, and the viscosity inequalities pass to the limit.

Proof

Conventions. From the setting we use the real numbers with their order and absolute value, Euclidean space with its distance dEd_{E} and notion of openness, S(n)\mathcal{S}(n) with its distance, and the notions of class C2C^{2}, gradient, Hessian, semicontinuity and local extrema; R\mathbb{R} carries the metric dRd_{\mathbb{R}} of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line, so that dR(s,t)=std_{\mathbb{R}}(s,t)=|s-t|. Elementary order facts are those of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, whose claim 1 is the compatibility of the strict order with addition, the non-strict law being an axiom of the ordered field R\mathbb{R}, whose order \le is a total order. We write ι\iota for the canonical map of N\mathbb{N} into R\mathbb{R} of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field. Two points in the proof choose one object for each natural number; both are appeals to the axiom of countable choice, and it is used nowhere else.

Three remarks used repeatedly.

(R1) Negated strict inequalities. If a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R} and a<ba<b fails, then bab\le a: by totality aba\le b or bab\le a, and in the first case aba\ne b would give a<ba<b, so a=ba=b and bab\le a by reflexivity.

(R2) Reciprocals. If N,kNN,k\in\mathbb{N} and NkN\le k, then ι(k)1ι(N)1\iota(k)^{-1}\le\iota(N)^{-1}. Indeed ι(N)ι(k)\iota(N)\le\iota(k), by claim 6 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field when N<kN<k and trivially when N=kN=k; both are positive by claim 3 of that lemma, so ι(N)1ι(k)1\iota(N)^{-1}\iota(k)^{-1} is positive by claims 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and multiplying by it, using claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and the field identities ι(N)ι(N)1=1\iota(N)\iota(N)^{-1}=1 and ι(k)ι(k)1=1\iota(k)\iota(k)^{-1}=1, gives the claim.

(R3) Limits respect eventual bounds. If a sequence (am)mN(a_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} of real numbers converges to LL and there are MNM\in\mathbb{N} and CRC\in\mathbb{R} with amCa_{m}\le C for every mMm\ge M, then LCL\le C. Otherwise C<LC<L by (R1), and applying the definition of convergence with the positive real LCL-C gives some mMm\ge M with amL<LC|a_{m}-L|<L-C; since LamamLL-a_{m}\le|a_{m}-L| by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, this yields Lam<LCL-a_{m}<L-C and hence C<amC<a_{m}, contradicting amCa_{m}\le C.

Proof. By claim 2 of Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope the function ww^{*} is upper semicontinuous on UU. Let φ:UR\varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} be of class C2C^{2} on UU and let zUz\in U be a point at which wφw^{*}-\varphi has a local maximum relative to UU. We must prove that

F(z,w(z),Dφ(z),D2φ(z))0.F\bigl(z,w^{*}(z),D\varphi(z),D^{2}\varphi(z)\bigr)\le 0 .

Step 1: a strict maximum on a compact ball. Let ψ:UR\psi:U\to\mathbb{R} be given by ψ(x)=φ(x)+xz4\psi(x)=\varphi(x)+\lVert x-z\rVert^{4}. By claim 3 of The Quartic Bump: Making a Local Maximum Strict without Changing the Test Data, applied with V=UV=U, S=US=U and h=wh=w^{*}, the function ψ\psi is of class C2C^{2} on UU, satisfies Dψ(z)=Dφ(z)D\psi(z)=D\varphi(z) and D2ψ(z)=D2φ(z)D^{2}\psi(z)=D^{2}\varphi(z), and wψw^{*}-\psi has a strict local maximum at zz relative to UU. It therefore suffices to prove that F(z,w(z),Dψ(z),D2ψ(z))0F(z,w^{*}(z),D\psi(z),D^{2}\psi(z))\le 0.

By the definition of a strict local maximum there is a positive δ0R\delta_{0}\in\mathbb{R} such that every xUx\in U with dE(z,x)<δ0d_{E}(z,x)<\delta_{0} and xzx\ne z satisfies w(x)ψ(x)<w(z)ψ(z)w^{*}(x)-\psi(x)<w^{*}(z)-\psi(z). Since UU is open, claim 4 of The Interior is the Largest Open Subset gives intRn(U)=U\operatorname{int}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}(U)=U, so claim 1 of Interior Points in the Metric Topology are Exactly the Centres of Contained Closed Balls provides a positive r0Rr_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with {xRn:dE(x,z)r0}U\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:d_{E}(x,z)\le r_{0}\}\subseteq U. By claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the number δ02\tfrac{\delta_{0}}{2} is positive and smaller than δ0\delta_{0}, and by claim 9 of that lemma there is a positive ρR\rho\in\mathbb{R} with ρr0\rho\le r_{0} and ρδ02\rho\le\tfrac{\delta_{0}}{2}. Put

K={xRn:dE(x,z)ρ},K=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:d_{E}(x,z)\le\rho\},

the closed ball of centre zz and radius ρ\rho in (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}). Then zKz\in K, so KK is nonempty; KUK\subseteq U because ρr0\rho\le r_{0}; and KK is compact by claim 2 of A Closed Euclidean Ball is Convex and Compact. Every xKx\in K with xzx\ne z satisfies dE(z,x)=dE(x,z)ρδ02<δ0d_{E}(z,x)=d_{E}(x,z)\le\rho\le\tfrac{\delta_{0}}{2}<\delta_{0}, hence

(1)w(x)ψ(x)<w(z)ψ(z)for every xK with xz.(1)\qquad w^{*}(x)-\psi(x)<w^{*}(z)-\psi(z)\qquad\text{for every }x\in K\text{ with }x\ne z .

Step 2: almost maximising members of the family. By claim 5 of Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope there is a sequence (xk)kN(x_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in UU converging to zz in (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) such that (w(xk))kN(w(x_{k}))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to w(z)w^{*}(z) in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). For each kNk\in\mathbb{N} the real number ι(k)1\iota(k)^{-1} is positive, so claim 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} provides some vFv\in\mathcal{F} with w(xk)ι(k)1<v(xk)w(x_{k})-\iota(k)^{-1}<v(x_{k}); choosing one such vv for each kk gives a sequence (vk)kN(v_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in F\mathcal{F} with

(2)w(xk)ι(k)1<vk(xk)w(xk)for every kN,(2)\qquad w(x_{k})-\iota(k)^{-1}<v_{k}(x_{k})\le w(x_{k})\qquad\text{for every }k\in\mathbb{N},

the right-hand inequality because w(xk)w(x_{k}) is an upper bound of {v(xk):vF}\{v(x_{k}):v\in\mathcal{F}\}.

The sequence (vk(xk))kN(v_{k}(x_{k}))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to w(z)w^{*}(z). Indeed, let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. There is N1NN_{1}\in\mathbb{N} with w(xk)w(z)<ε2|w(x_{k})-w^{*}(z)|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} for every kN1k\ge N_{1}, and by claim 3 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is N2NN_{2}\in\mathbb{N} with ι(N2)1<ε2\iota(N_{2})^{-1}<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}. Let NN be the greater of N1N_{1} and N2N_{2}, which exists by the definition of the maximum because the order of N\mathbb{N} is a total order by claims 1, 2 and 3 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, and satisfies N1NN_{1}\le N and N2NN_{2}\le N by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements. For kNk\ge N we have 0w(xk)vk(xk)<ι(k)1ι(N2)1<ε20\le w(x_{k})-v_{k}(x_{k})<\iota(k)^{-1}\le\iota(N_{2})^{-1}<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} by (2) and (R2), so vk(xk)w(xk)<ε2|v_{k}(x_{k})-w(x_{k})|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and the triangle inequality of claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

vk(xk)w(z)vk(xk)w(xk)+w(xk)w(z)<ε2+ε2=ε.|v_{k}(x_{k})-w^{*}(z)|\le|v_{k}(x_{k})-w(x_{k})|+|w(x_{k})-w^{*}(z)|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon .

Step 3: maximisers on KK. Fix kNk\in\mathbb{N}. Being a viscosity subsolution, vkv_{k} is upper semicontinuous on UU, hence its restriction to KK is upper semicontinuous on KK by claim 2 of Negation, Restriction, and Separated Differences of Semicontinuous Functions. By claim 1 of Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function the function ψ\psi is continuous at every point of UU relative to UU, hence lower semicontinuous there by claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity, and its restriction to KK is lower semicontinuous on KK by claim 2 of Negation, Restriction, and Separated Differences of Semicontinuous Functions. Claim 3 of the latter lemma then shows that the function KRK\to\mathbb{R} whose value at xx is vk(x)ψ(x)v_{k}(x)-\psi(x) is upper semicontinuous on KK, so claim 1 of Semicontinuous Functions Attain Their Extrema on a Compact Set provides a point of KK at which it attains a maximum. Choosing one such point for each kk gives a sequence (y^k)kN(\hat y_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in KK with

(3)vk(x)ψ(x)vk(y^k)ψ(y^k)for every xK and every kN.(3)\qquad v_{k}(x)-\psi(x)\le v_{k}(\hat y_{k})-\psi(\hat y_{k})\qquad\text{for every }x\in K\text{ and every }k\in\mathbb{N}.

Since (xk)(x_{k}) converges to zz and ρ\rho is positive, there is N0NN_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with dE(xk,z)<ρd_{E}(x_{k},z)<\rho, hence xkKx_{k}\in K, for every kN0k\ge N_{0}.

Step 4: the maximisers converge to zz. We verify the hypothesis of claim 2 of The Subsequence Criterion for Convergence in a Metric Space for the sequence (y^k)kN(\hat y_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and the point zz. Let (kl)lN(k_{l})_{l\in\mathbb{N}} be a strictly increasing sequence in N\mathbb{N}. Since KK is compact and (y^kl)lN(\hat y_{k_{l}})_{l\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence in KK, A Compact Subset of a Metric Space is Sequentially Compact provides a strictly increasing (lm)mN(l_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N} and a point yKy\in K such that (y^klm)mN(\hat y_{k_{l_{m}}})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges to yy in (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}). Put πm=klm\pi_{m}=k_{l_{m}}; by claim 1 of The Subsequence Criterion for Convergence in a Metric Space the sequence (πm)mN(\pi_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is strictly increasing, so mπmm\le\pi_{m} for every mm by Strictly Increasing Sequences of Natural Numbers Dominate Their Index, and by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit the sequences (xπm)m(x_{\pi_{m}})_{m} and (vπm(xπm))m(v_{\pi_{m}}(x_{\pi_{m}}))_{m} converge to zz and to w(z)w^{*}(z) respectively.

We show y=zy=z. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. By claim 2 of Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope, by the lower semicontinuity of ψ\psi established in Step 3, and by claim 3 of Negation, Restriction, and Separated Differences of Semicontinuous Functions, the function wψw^{*}-\psi is upper semicontinuous at yy relative to UU, so there is a positive δ\delta such that every xUx\in U with dE(y,x)<δd_{E}(y,x)<\delta satisfies

w(x)ψ(x)<w(y)ψ(y)+ε.w^{*}(x)-\psi(x)<w^{*}(y)-\psi(y)+\varepsilon .

There is M1NM_{1}\in\mathbb{N} with dE(y^πm,y)<δd_{E}(\hat y_{\pi_{m}},y)<\delta for every mM1m\ge M_{1}. Let MM be the greater of M1M_{1} and N0N_{0}. For mMm\ge M we have πmmN0\pi_{m}\ge m\ge N_{0}, so xπmKx_{\pi_{m}}\in K and (3) applies with x=xπmx=x_{\pi_{m}}; moreover vπm(y^πm)w(y^πm)w(y^πm)v_{\pi_{m}}(\hat y_{\pi_{m}})\le w(\hat y_{\pi_{m}})\le w^{*}(\hat y_{\pi_{m}}) by the definition of ww and claim 1 of Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope. Combining,

vπm(xπm)ψ(xπm)vπm(y^πm)ψ(y^πm)w(y^πm)ψ(y^πm)<w(y)ψ(y)+ε.v_{\pi_{m}}(x_{\pi_{m}})-\psi(x_{\pi_{m}})\le v_{\pi_{m}}(\hat y_{\pi_{m}})-\psi(\hat y_{\pi_{m}})\le w^{*}(\hat y_{\pi_{m}})-\psi(\hat y_{\pi_{m}})<w^{*}(y)-\psi(y)+\varepsilon .

By claim 1 of Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity the sequence (ψ(xπm))m(\psi(x_{\pi_{m}}))_{m} converges to ψ(z)\psi(z), so by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences the left-hand side converges to w(z)ψ(z)w^{*}(z)-\psi(z), and (R3) gives

(4)w(z)ψ(z)w(y)ψ(y)+ε.(4)\qquad w^{*}(z)-\psi(z)\le w^{*}(y)-\psi(y)+\varepsilon .

As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real, claim 1 of Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack gives w(z)ψ(z)w(y)ψ(y)w^{*}(z)-\psi(z)\le w^{*}(y)-\psi(y). If yzy\ne z this contradicts (1) together with the mixed transitivity of claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and the irreflexivity of the strict order. Hence y=zy=z.

Thus every subsequence of (y^k)kN(\hat y_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} has in turn a subsequence converging to zz, and claim 2 of The Subsequence Criterion for Convergence in a Metric Space shows that (y^k)kN(\hat y_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to zz in (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}).

Step 5: the values at the maximisers converge. We show that (vk(y^k))kN(v_{k}(\hat y_{k}))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to w(z)w^{*}(z). Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. By claim 1 of Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity the sequences (ψ(xk))k(\psi(x_{k}))_{k} and (ψ(y^k))k(\psi(\hat y_{k}))_{k} both converge to ψ(z)\psi(z), so by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences and Step 2 the sequence bk=vk(xk)ψ(xk)+ψ(y^k)b_{k}=v_{k}(x_{k})-\psi(x_{k})+\psi(\hat y_{k}) converges to w(z)ψ(z)+ψ(z)=w(z)w^{*}(z)-\psi(z)+\psi(z)=w^{*}(z); hence there is N3N_{3} with bkw(z)<ε|b_{k}-w^{*}(z)|<\varepsilon, and so w(z)ε<bkw^{*}(z)-\varepsilon<b_{k} by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, for every kN3k\ge N_{3}. For kN0k\ge N_{0} we have xkKx_{k}\in K, so (3) gives bkvk(y^k)b_{k}\le v_{k}(\hat y_{k}). On the other hand ww^{*} is upper semicontinuous at zz relative to UU, so there is a positive δ1\delta_{1} such that every xUx\in U with dE(z,x)<δ1d_{E}(z,x)<\delta_{1} satisfies w(x)<w(z)+εw^{*}(x)<w^{*}(z)+\varepsilon, and there is N4N_{4} with dE(y^k,z)<δ1d_{E}(\hat y_{k},z)<\delta_{1} for kN4k\ge N_{4}; for such kk,

vk(y^k)w(y^k)<w(z)+ε.v_{k}(\hat y_{k})\le w^{*}(\hat y_{k})<w^{*}(z)+\varepsilon .

Taking kk at least each of N0N_{0}, N3N_{3} and N4N_{4} — a bound obtained by two applications of the maximum of two natural numbers — we get w(z)ε<vk(y^k)<w(z)+εw^{*}(z)-\varepsilon<v_{k}(\hat y_{k})<w^{*}(z)+\varepsilon, hence vk(y^k)w(z)<ε|v_{k}(\hat y_{k})-w^{*}(z)|<\varepsilon by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. This is the asserted convergence.

Step 6: passing to the limit in the viscosity inequality. Since (y^k)(\hat y_{k}) converges to zz there is N5NN_{5}\in\mathbb{N} with dE(y^k,z)<ρd_{E}(\hat y_{k},z)<\rho for every kN5k\ge N_{5}. Fix such a kk and put δ2=ρdE(y^k,z)\delta_{2}=\rho-d_{E}(\hat y_{k},z), which is positive by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Every xUx\in U with dE(y^k,x)<δ2d_{E}(\hat y_{k},x)<\delta_{2} satisfies, by the triangle inequality of a metric,

dE(x,z)dE(x,y^k)+dE(y^k,z)<δ2+dE(y^k,z)=ρ,d_{E}(x,z)\le d_{E}(x,\hat y_{k})+d_{E}(\hat y_{k},z)<\delta_{2}+d_{E}(\hat y_{k},z)=\rho ,

so xKx\in K and (3) gives vk(x)ψ(x)vk(y^k)ψ(y^k)v_{k}(x)-\psi(x)\le v_{k}(\hat y_{k})-\psi(\hat y_{k}). Hence vkψv_{k}-\psi has a local maximum at y^k\hat y_{k} relative to UU, and since vkv_{k} is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU and ψ\psi is of class C2C^{2} on UU,

(5)F(y^k,vk(y^k),Dψ(y^k),D2ψ(y^k))0for every kN5.(5)\qquad F\bigl(\hat y_{k},v_{k}(\hat y_{k}),D\psi(\hat y_{k}),D^{2}\psi(\hat y_{k})\bigr)\le 0\qquad\text{for every }k\ge N_{5}.

By claims 2 and 3 of Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function the gradient and Hessian maps of ψ\psi are continuous at zz relative to UU, so claim 1 of Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity shows that (Dψ(y^k))k(D\psi(\hat y_{k}))_{k} converges to Dψ(z)D\psi(z) in (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) and (D2ψ(y^k))k(D^{2}\psi(\hat y_{k}))_{k} converges to D2ψ(z)D^{2}\psi(z) in (S(n),dS(n))(\mathcal{S}(n),d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}). Together with Steps 4 and 5 and the continuity of FF, Sequential Form of the Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator shows that the real sequence appearing in (5) converges to F(z,w(z),Dψ(z),D2ψ(z))F(z,w^{*}(z),D\psi(z),D^{2}\psi(z)). By (R3),

F(z,w(z),Dψ(z),D2ψ(z))0,F\bigl(z,w^{*}(z),D\psi(z),D^{2}\psi(z)\bigr)\le 0 ,

and since Dψ(z)=Dφ(z)D\psi(z)=D\varphi(z) and D2ψ(z)=D2φ(z)D^{2}\psi(z)=D^{2}\varphi(z) this is the required inequality. As φ\varphi and zz were arbitrary, ww^{*} is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…