Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Write A ( z ) = D 2 Φ ( z ) A(z)=D^{2}\Phi(z) A ( z ) = D 2 Φ ( z ) , the Hessian matrix , with entries A j k ( z ) = ∂ j ∂ k Φ ( z ) A_{jk}(z)=\partial_{j}\partial_{k}\Phi(z) A jk ( z ) = ∂ j ∂ k Φ ( z ) ; it lies in S ( d ) \mathcal{S}(d) S ( d ) and ∂ j ∂ k Φ = ∂ k ∂ j Φ \partial_{j}\partial_{k}\Phi=\partial_{k}\partial_{j}\Phi ∂ j ∂ k Φ = ∂ k ∂ j Φ by claims 1 and 2 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian . Since Φ \Phi Φ is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d (Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives ), clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set with k = 1 k=1 k = 1 , read through the scalar convention of clause 3 there, shows that Φ \Phi Φ and each ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ are of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d ; the k k k th component of ∇ Φ ( x ) = D Φ ( x ) \nabla\Phi(x)=D\Phi(x) ∇Φ ( x ) = D Φ ( x ) is ∂ k Φ ( x ) \partial_{k}\Phi(x) ∂ k Φ ( x ) by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set . By A Real-Valued C^1 Function is Differentiable at Every Point both Φ \Phi Φ and each ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ are differentiable at every point, the partial derivatives of ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ being ∂ j ∂ k Φ \partial_{j}\partial_{k}\Phi ∂ j ∂ k Φ (clause 4 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set ). The i i i th coordinate of z ∈ R d z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z ∈ R d is z ⋅ e i z\cdot e_{i} z ⋅ e i and ∥ e i ∥ = 1 \lVert e_{i}\rVert=1 ∥ e i ∥ = 1 (Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §basis ).
Claim 1 (Quadratic form and entry bounds). For all z , v ∈ R d z,v\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z , v ∈ R d and j , k ∈ [ d ] j,k\in[d] j , k ∈ [ d ] ,
ε ∥ v ∥ 2 ≤ v ⋅ ( A ( z ) v ) ≤ L ∥ v ∥ 2 , ∣ A j k ( z ) ∣ ≤ L . \varepsilon\lVert v\rVert^{2}\le v\cdot(A(z)v)\le L\lVert v\rVert^{2},\qquad |A_{jk}(z)|\le L . ε ∥ v ∥ 2 ≤ v ⋅ ( A ( z ) v ) ≤ L ∥ v ∥ 2 , ∣ A jk ( z ) ∣ ≤ L .
By Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §ordering , ε I d ⪯ A ( z ) ⪯ L I d \varepsilon I_{d}\preceq A(z)\preceq LI_{d} ε I d ⪯ A ( z ) ⪯ L I d means v ⋅ ( ( ε I d ) v ) ≤ v ⋅ ( A ( z ) v ) ≤ v ⋅ ( ( L I d ) v ) v\cdot((\varepsilon I_{d})v)\le v\cdot(A(z)v)\le v\cdot((LI_{d})v) v ⋅ (( ε I d ) v ) ≤ v ⋅ ( A ( z ) v ) ≤ v ⋅ (( L I d ) v ) , and v ⋅ ( ( c I d ) v ) = c v ⋅ v = c ∥ v ∥ 2 v\cdot((cI_{d})v)=c\,v\cdot v=c\lVert v\rVert^{2} v ⋅ (( c I d ) v ) = c v ⋅ v = c ∥ v ∥ 2 (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ). With v = e j v=e_{j} v = e j , Matrix-Vector Product gives e j ⋅ ( A e j ) = A j j e_{j}\cdot(A e_{j})=A_{jj} e j ⋅ ( A e j ) = A jj , so ε ≤ A j j ≤ L \varepsilon\le A_{jj}\le L ε ≤ A jj ≤ L and ∣ A j j ∣ ≤ L |A_{jj}|\le L ∣ A jj ∣ ≤ L (claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , as − L < 0 < ε -L<0<\varepsilon − L < 0 < ε ). For j ≠ k j\ne k j = k and v = e j ± e k v=e_{j}\pm e_{k} v = e j ± e k , bilinearity and A j k = A k j A_{jk}=A_{kj} A jk = A kj give v ⋅ ( A v ) = A j j + A k k ± 2 A j k v\cdot(Av)=A_{jj}+A_{kk}\pm2A_{jk} v ⋅ ( A v ) = A jj + A kk ± 2 A jk , which is ≥ ε ∥ v ∥ 2 ≥ 0 \ge\varepsilon\lVert v\rVert^{2}\ge0 ≥ ε ∥ v ∥ 2 ≥ 0 ; hence ∓ A j k ≤ 1 2 ( A j j + A k k ) ≤ L \mp A_{jk}\le\frac12(A_{jj}+A_{kk})\le L ∓ A jk ≤ 2 1 ( A jj + A kk ) ≤ L , and ∣ A j k ∣ ≤ L |A_{jk}|\le L ∣ A jk ∣ ≤ L by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field .
Claim 2 (Monotonicity). For all x , y ∈ R d x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , y ∈ R d , with h = y − x h=y-x h = y − x ,
( ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ) ⋅ h ≥ ε ∥ h ∥ 2 . \bigl(\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x)\bigr)\cdot h\ge\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2}. ( ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x ) ) ⋅ h ≥ ε ∥ h ∥ 2 .
Define γ : [ − 1 , 2 ] → R \gamma:[-1,2]\to\mathbb{R} γ : [ − 1 , 2 ] → R by γ ( τ ) = ∑ k = 1 d h k ∂ k Φ ( x + τ h ) \gamma(\tau)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}h_{k}\,\partial_{k}\Phi(x+\tau h) γ ( τ ) = ∑ k = 1 d h k ∂ k Φ ( x + τ h ) . Let τ ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] \tau\in[0,1] τ ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] , an interior point of [ − 1 , 2 ] [-1,2] [ − 1 , 2 ] . By Chain Rule Along an Affine Path applied to ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ (differentiable at x + τ h x+\tau h x + τ h ), τ ↦ ∂ k Φ ( x + τ h ) \tau\mapsto\partial_{k}\Phi(x+\tau h) τ ↦ ∂ k Φ ( x + τ h ) is differentiable at τ \tau τ with derivative ∑ j ∂ j ∂ k Φ ( x + τ h ) h j \sum_{j}\partial_{j}\partial_{k}\Phi(x+\tau h)h_{j} ∑ j ∂ j ∂ k Φ ( x + τ h ) h j , so by Derivative of a Finite Linear Combination of Real Functions γ \gamma γ is differentiable at τ \tau τ with
γ ′ ( τ ) = ∑ k = 1 d ∑ j = 1 d h k A j k ( x + τ h ) h j = h ⋅ ( A ( x + τ h ) h ) ≥ ε ∥ h ∥ 2 , \gamma'(\tau)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\sum_{j=1}^{d}h_{k}A_{jk}(x+\tau h)h_{j}=h\cdot\bigl(A(x+\tau h)h\bigr)\ge\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2}, γ ′ ( τ ) = k = 1 ∑ d j = 1 ∑ d h k A jk ( x + τ h ) h j = h ⋅ ( A ( x + τ h ) h ) ≥ ε ∥ h ∥ 2 ,
by Matrix-Vector Product , the symmetry of A A A and Claim 1. By Differentiability at an Interior Point Implies Continuity There , γ \gamma γ is continuous at each τ ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] \tau\in[0,1] τ ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] relative to [ − 1 , 2 ] [-1,2] [ − 1 , 2 ] , hence its restriction to [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] [ 0 , 1 ] is continuous on [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] [ 0 , 1 ] ; and at τ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) \tau\in(0,1) τ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) the restriction is differentiable with the same derivative, directly from Derivative at an Interior Point (the condition there for the restriction concerns fewer increments). By Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval there is ξ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) \xi\in(0,1) ξ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) with γ ( 1 ) − γ ( 0 ) = γ ′ ( ξ ) ≥ ε ∥ h ∥ 2 \gamma(1)-\gamma(0)=\gamma'(\xi)\ge\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2} γ ( 1 ) − γ ( 0 ) = γ ′ ( ξ ) ≥ ε ∥ h ∥ 2 , and γ ( 1 ) − γ ( 0 ) = ( ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ) ⋅ h \gamma(1)-\gamma(0)=(\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x))\cdot h γ ( 1 ) − γ ( 0 ) = ( ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x )) ⋅ h .
Step 1 (Proof of lem:gradient-diffeomorphism-strongly-convex-2026a#bilipschitz). Let x , y x,y x , y , h = y − x h=y-x h = y − x . Lower bound: by Claim 2 and Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product (with claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ), ε ∥ h ∥ 2 ≤ ∥ ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ∥ ∥ h ∥ \varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2}\le\lVert\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x)\rVert\,\lVert h\rVert ε ∥ h ∥ 2 ≤ ∥ ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x )∥ ∥ h ∥ . If h = 0 h=0 h = 0 the lower bound is trivial; otherwise 0 < ∥ h ∥ 0<\lVert h\rVert 0 < ∥ h ∥ (claims 1 and 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ) and multiplying by ∥ h ∥ − 1 \lVert h\rVert^{-1} ∥ h ∥ − 1 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) gives ε ∥ h ∥ ≤ ∥ ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ∥ \varepsilon\lVert h\rVert\le\lVert\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x)\rVert ε ∥ h ∥ ≤ ∥ ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x )∥ ; as ∥ x − y ∥ = ∥ h ∥ \lVert x-y\rVert=\lVert h\rVert ∥ x − y ∥ = ∥ h ∥ and ∥ ∇ Φ ( x ) − ∇ Φ ( y ) ∥ = ∥ ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ∥ \lVert\nabla\Phi(x)-\nabla\Phi(y)\rVert=\lVert\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x)\rVert ∥ ∇Φ ( x ) − ∇Φ ( y )∥ = ∥ ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x )∥ (claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n with λ = − 1 \lambda=-1 λ = − 1 ), this is the left inequality. Upper bound: for each k k k , ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d with partial derivatives ∂ j ∂ k Φ = A j k \partial_{j}\partial_{k}\Phi=A_{jk} ∂ j ∂ k Φ = A jk bounded in absolute value by L L L (Claim 1), so part (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder , with W = R d W=\mathbb{R}^{d} W = R d and M 1 = L M_{1}=L M 1 = L , gives ∣ ∂ k Φ ( y ) − ∂ k Φ ( x ) ∣ ≤ d L ∥ h ∥ |\partial_{k}\Phi(y)-\partial_{k}\Phi(x)|\le\sqrt{d}\,L\lVert h\rVert ∣ ∂ k Φ ( y ) − ∂ k Φ ( x ) ∣ ≤ d L ∥ h ∥ . Squaring (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field , both sides being nonnegative) and summing over k k k , claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n gives ∥ ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ∥ 2 ≤ d ⋅ d L 2 ∥ h ∥ 2 = ( d L ∥ h ∥ ) 2 \lVert\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x)\rVert^{2}\le d\cdot d\,L^{2}\lVert h\rVert^{2}=(dL\lVert h\rVert)^{2} ∥ ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x ) ∥ 2 ≤ d ⋅ d L 2 ∥ h ∥ 2 = ( d L ∥ h ∥ ) 2 , hence ∥ ∇ Φ ( y ) − ∇ Φ ( x ) ∥ ≤ d L ∥ h ∥ \lVert\nabla\Phi(y)-\nabla\Phi(x)\rVert\le dL\lVert h\rVert ∥ ∇Φ ( y ) − ∇Φ ( x )∥ ≤ d L ∥ h ∥ by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field again.
Step 2 (Proof of lem:gradient-diffeomorphism-strongly-convex-2026a#bijection). Injectivity: if ∇ Φ ( x ) = ∇ Φ ( y ) \nabla\Phi(x)=\nabla\Phi(y) ∇Φ ( x ) = ∇Φ ( y ) , Step 1 gives ε ∥ x − y ∥ ≤ 0 \varepsilon\lVert x-y\rVert\le0 ε ∥ x − y ∥ ≤ 0 , so ∥ x − y ∥ = 0 \lVert x-y\rVert=0 ∥ x − y ∥ = 0 and x = y x=y x = y by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n .
Surjectivity: fix p ∈ R d p\in\mathbb{R}^{d} p ∈ R d , let Ψ ( z ) = Φ ( z ) − p ⋅ z \Psi(z)=\Phi(z)-p\cdot z Ψ ( z ) = Φ ( z ) − p ⋅ z , and put q = ∇ Φ ( 0 R d ) − p q=\nabla\Phi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})-p q = ∇Φ ( 0 R d ) − p . The map Ψ \Psi Ψ is continuous on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d for d E d_{E} d E : Φ \Phi Φ is, by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and C k C^k C k Maps are Continuous , and ∣ p ⋅ z − p ⋅ z ′ ∣ ≤ ∥ p ∥ ∥ z − z ′ ∥ |p\cdot z-p\cdot z'|\le\lVert p\rVert\,\lVert z-z'\rVert ∣ p ⋅ z − p ⋅ z ′ ∣ ≤ ∥ p ∥ ∥ z − z ′ ∥ by Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product , so z ↦ p ⋅ z z\mapsto p\cdot z z ↦ p ⋅ z is continuous, and claims 2 and 4 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space apply.
Fix x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d and define ϕ ( τ ) = Φ ( τ x ) − τ ( p ⋅ x ) = Ψ ( τ x ) \phi(\tau)=\Phi(\tau x)-\tau\,(p\cdot x)=\Psi(\tau x) ϕ ( τ ) = Φ ( τx ) − τ ( p ⋅ x ) = Ψ ( τx ) on [ − 1 , 2 ] [-1,2] [ − 1 , 2 ] . At each interior τ \tau τ , Chain Rule Along an Affine Path (base point 0 R d 0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} 0 R d , direction x x x ) gives the derivative ∇ Φ ( τ x ) ⋅ x \nabla\Phi(\tau x)\cdot x ∇Φ ( τx ) ⋅ x of τ ↦ Φ ( τ x ) \tau\mapsto\Phi(\tau x) τ ↦ Φ ( τx ) , the map τ ↦ τ ( p ⋅ x ) \tau\mapsto\tau(p\cdot x) τ ↦ τ ( p ⋅ x ) has derivative p ⋅ x p\cdot x p ⋅ x (its difference quotients are constant, Derivative at an Interior Point ), and Derivative of a Finite Linear Combination of Real Functions gives ϕ ′ ( τ ) = ( ∇ Φ ( τ x ) − p ) ⋅ x \phi'(\tau)=(\nabla\Phi(\tau x)-p)\cdot x ϕ ′ ( τ ) = ( ∇Φ ( τx ) − p ) ⋅ x . For 0 < τ 0<\tau 0 < τ , Claim 2 with the points 0 R d 0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} 0 R d and τ x \tau x τx gives τ ( ∇ Φ ( τ x ) − ∇ Φ ( 0 R d ) ) ⋅ x ≥ ε τ 2 ∥ x ∥ 2 \tau(\nabla\Phi(\tau x)-\nabla\Phi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}))\cdot x\ge\varepsilon\tau^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2} τ ( ∇Φ ( τx ) − ∇Φ ( 0 R d )) ⋅ x ≥ ε τ 2 ∥ x ∥ 2 , and multiplying by τ − 1 > 0 \tau^{-1}>0 τ − 1 > 0 (claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ),
ϕ ′ ( τ ) = q ⋅ x + ( ∇ Φ ( τ x ) − ∇ Φ ( 0 R d ) ) ⋅ x ≥ q ⋅ x + ε τ ∥ x ∥ 2 ≥ q ⋅ x . \phi'(\tau)=q\cdot x+(\nabla\Phi(\tau x)-\nabla\Phi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}))\cdot x\ge q\cdot x+\varepsilon\tau\lVert x\rVert^{2}\ge q\cdot x . ϕ ′ ( τ ) = q ⋅ x + ( ∇Φ ( τx ) − ∇Φ ( 0 R d )) ⋅ x ≥ q ⋅ x + ε τ ∥ x ∥ 2 ≥ q ⋅ x .
As in Claim 2, the restrictions of ϕ \phi ϕ to [ 0 , 1 2 ] [0,\tfrac12] [ 0 , 2 1 ] and [ 1 2 , 1 ] [\tfrac12,1] [ 2 1 , 1 ] satisfy the hypotheses of Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval , giving ξ 1 ∈ ( 0 , 1 2 ) \xi_{1}\in(0,\frac12) ξ 1 ∈ ( 0 , 2 1 ) and ξ 2 ∈ ( 1 2 , 1 ) \xi_{2}\in(\frac12,1) ξ 2 ∈ ( 2 1 , 1 ) with ϕ ( 1 2 ) − ϕ ( 0 ) = 1 2 ϕ ′ ( ξ 1 ) ≥ 1 2 q ⋅ x \phi(\frac12)-\phi(0)=\frac12\phi'(\xi_{1})\ge\frac12\,q\cdot x ϕ ( 2 1 ) − ϕ ( 0 ) = 2 1 ϕ ′ ( ξ 1 ) ≥ 2 1 q ⋅ x and ϕ ( 1 ) − ϕ ( 1 2 ) = 1 2 ϕ ′ ( ξ 2 ) ≥ 1 2 ( q ⋅ x + ε 2 ∥ x ∥ 2 ) \phi(1)-\phi(\frac12)=\frac12\phi'(\xi_{2})\ge\frac12(q\cdot x+\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}) ϕ ( 1 ) − ϕ ( 2 1 ) = 2 1 ϕ ′ ( ξ 2 ) ≥ 2 1 ( q ⋅ x + 2 ε ∥ x ∥ 2 ) . Adding, and using q ⋅ x ≥ − ∥ q ∥ ∥ x ∥ q\cdot x\ge-\lVert q\rVert\,\lVert x\rVert q ⋅ x ≥ − ∥ q ∥ ∥ x ∥ (Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product , claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ),
Ψ ( x ) − Ψ ( 0 R d ) ≥ q ⋅ x + ε 4 ∥ x ∥ 2 ≥ ∥ x ∥ ( ε 4 ∥ x ∥ − ∥ q ∥ ) . \Psi(x)-\Psi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\ge q\cdot x+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\ge\lVert x\rVert\bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}\lVert x\rVert-\lVert q\rVert\bigr). Ψ ( x ) − Ψ ( 0 R d ) ≥ q ⋅ x + 4 ε ∥ x ∥ 2 ≥ ∥ x ∥ ( 4 ε ∥ x ∥ − ∥ q ∥ ) .
Let R = 4 ε − 1 ∥ q ∥ + 1 R=4\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert q\rVert+1 R = 4 ε − 1 ∥ q ∥ + 1 , positive. If ∥ x ∥ ≥ R \lVert x\rVert\ge R ∥ x ∥ ≥ R , then ε 4 ∥ x ∥ − ∥ q ∥ ≥ ε 4 > 0 \frac{\varepsilon}{4}\lVert x\rVert-\lVert q\rVert\ge\frac{\varepsilon}{4}>0 4 ε ∥ x ∥ − ∥ q ∥ ≥ 4 ε > 0 and ∥ x ∥ ≥ R > 0 \lVert x\rVert\ge R>0 ∥ x ∥ ≥ R > 0 , so Ψ ( x ) > Ψ ( 0 R d ) \Psi(x)>\Psi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}) Ψ ( x ) > Ψ ( 0 R d ) (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ).
Let O = { z : ∥ z ∥ < R } O=\{z:\lVert z\rVert<R\} O = { z : ∥ z ∥ < R } , bounded in ( R d , d E ) (\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) ( R d , d E ) by Bounded Subset of a Metric Space (centre 0 R d 0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} 0 R d , radius R R R , using claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ), and let K K K be its closure, which is compact by The Closure of a Bounded Subset of R n \mathbb{R}^n R n is Compact and contains O ∋ 0 R d O\ni0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} O ∋ 0 R d by claim 1 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset . By Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space applied to the restriction of Ψ \Psi Ψ to K K K there is x ∗ ∈ K x^{*}\in K x ∗ ∈ K with Ψ ( x ∗ ) ≤ Ψ ( z ) \Psi(x^{*})\le\Psi(z) Ψ ( x ∗ ) ≤ Ψ ( z ) for all z ∈ K z\in K z ∈ K . Then Ψ ( x ∗ ) ≤ Ψ ( z ) \Psi(x^{*})\le\Psi(z) Ψ ( x ∗ ) ≤ Ψ ( z ) for every z ∈ R d z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z ∈ R d : if ∥ z ∥ < R \lVert z\rVert<R ∥ z ∥ < R then z ∈ K z\in K z ∈ K ; otherwise Ψ ( z ) > Ψ ( 0 R d ) ≥ Ψ ( x ∗ ) \Psi(z)>\Psi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\ge\Psi(x^{*}) Ψ ( z ) > Ψ ( 0 R d ) ≥ Ψ ( x ∗ ) .
Fix i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] and let g i ( s ) = Ψ ( x ∗ + s e i ) g_{i}(s)=\Psi(x^{*}+se_{i}) g i ( s ) = Ψ ( x ∗ + s e i ) on the open interval ( − 1 , 1 ) (-1,1) ( − 1 , 1 ) . For s ≠ 0 s\ne0 s = 0 ,
g i ( s ) − g i ( 0 ) s = Φ ( x ∗ + s e i ) − Φ ( x ∗ ) s − p i , \frac{g_{i}(s)-g_{i}(0)}{s}=\frac{\Phi(x^{*}+se_{i})-\Phi(x^{*})}{s}-p_{i}, s g i ( s ) − g i ( 0 ) = s Φ ( x ∗ + s e i ) − Φ ( x ∗ ) − p i ,
since p ⋅ e i = p i p\cdot e_{i}=p_{i} p ⋅ e i = p i ; the point x ∗ + s e i x^{*}+se_{i} x ∗ + s e i is x ∗ x^{*} x ∗ with i i i th coordinate increased by s s s , so by Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set and Derivative at an Interior Point , g i g_{i} g i is differentiable at 0 0 0 with g i ′ ( 0 ) = ∂ i Φ ( x ∗ ) − p i g_{i}'(0)=\partial_{i}\Phi(x^{*})-p_{i} g i ′ ( 0 ) = ∂ i Φ ( x ∗ ) − p i . As g i ( 0 ) ≤ g i ( s ) g_{i}(0)\le g_{i}(s) g i ( 0 ) ≤ g i ( s ) for all s s s , g i g_{i} g i has a local minimum at 0 0 0 relative to ( − 1 , 1 ) (-1,1) ( − 1 , 1 ) , and Vanishing of the Derivative at an Interior Local Extremum gives g i ′ ( 0 ) = 0 g_{i}'(0)=0 g i ′ ( 0 ) = 0 . Hence ∂ i Φ ( x ∗ ) = p i \partial_{i}\Phi(x^{*})=p_{i} ∂ i Φ ( x ∗ ) = p i for every i i i , that is, ∇ Φ ( x ∗ ) = p \nabla\Phi(x^{*})=p ∇Φ ( x ∗ ) = p .
Claim 3 (Continuity criterion). Let g : R d → R g:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} g : R d → R and a ∈ R d a\in\mathbb{R}^{d} a ∈ R d , and suppose that for every real η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 there is a real ρ > 0 \rho>0 ρ > 0 with ∣ g ( y ) − g ( a ) ∣ < η |g(y)-g(a)|<\eta ∣ g ( y ) − g ( a ) ∣ < η for every y y y with ∥ y − a ∥ < ρ \lVert y-a\rVert<\rho ∥ y − a ∥ < ρ . Then g g g is continuous at a a a ; the converse also holds. Indeed ∑ i = 1 d ( y i − a i ) 2 = ∥ y − a ∥ 2 \sum_{i=1}^{d}(y_{i}-a_{i})^{2}=\lVert y-a\rVert^{2} ∑ i = 1 d ( y i − a i ) 2 = ∥ y − a ∥ 2 by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , ( g ( y ) − g ( a ) ) 2 = ∣ g ( y ) − g ( a ) ∣ 2 (g(y)-g(a))^{2}=|g(y)-g(a)|^{2} ( g ( y ) − g ( a ) ) 2 = ∣ g ( y ) − g ( a ) ∣ 2 by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , and for nonnegative s s s and positive t t t we have s < t s<t s < t if and only if s 2 < t 2 s^{2}<t^{2} s 2 < t 2 by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field ; so the condition with δ = ρ \delta=\rho δ = ρ is exactly that of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces with m = 1 m=1 m = 1 .
Claim 4 (Norm from coordinates). If q ≥ 1 q\ge1 q ≥ 1 , w ∈ R q w\in\mathbb{R}^{q} w ∈ R q , s s s is a nonnegative real and ∣ w k ∣ ≤ s |w_{k}|\le s ∣ w k ∣ ≤ s for every k ∈ [ q ] k\in[q] k ∈ [ q ] , then ∥ w ∥ ≤ q s \lVert w\rVert\le q\,s ∥ w ∥ ≤ q s . Indeed ∥ w ∥ = d E ( w , 0 R q ) ≤ ∑ k = 1 q ∣ w k ∣ \lVert w\rVert=d_{E}(w,0_{\mathbb{R}^{q}})\le\sum_{k=1}^{q}|w_{k}| ∥ w ∥ = d E ( w , 0 R q ) ≤ ∑ k = 1 q ∣ w k ∣ by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n and claim 1 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals , and ∑ k = 1 q ∣ w k ∣ ≤ ∑ k = 1 q s = q s \sum_{k=1}^{q}|w_{k}|\le\sum_{k=1}^{q}s=q\,s ∑ k = 1 q ∣ w k ∣ ≤ ∑ k = 1 q s = q s by claims 2, 3 and 5 of Properties of Finite Sums applied to the nonnegative summands s − ∣ w k ∣ s-|w_{k}| s − ∣ w k ∣ .
Step 3 (Positive definiteness and the Jacobian of ∇ Φ \nabla\Phi ∇Φ ). Let x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d . The matrix A ( x ) A(x) A ( x ) lies in S ( d ) \mathcal{S}(d) S ( d ) , and for v ≠ 0 R d v\ne0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} v = 0 R d we have 0 < ∥ v ∥ 0<\lVert v\rVert 0 < ∥ v ∥ (claims 1 and 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ), so v ⋅ ( A ( x ) v ) ≥ ε ∥ v ∥ 2 > 0 v\cdot(A(x)v)\ge\varepsilon\lVert v\rVert^{2}>0 v ⋅ ( A ( x ) v ) ≥ ε ∥ v ∥ 2 > 0 by Claim 1 and claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ; thus A ( x ) A(x) A ( x ) is positive definite . The components ∂ i Φ \partial_{i}\Phi ∂ i Φ of ∇ Φ \nabla\Phi ∇Φ are of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , and the entry of D ( ∇ Φ ) ( x ) D(\nabla\Phi)(x) D ( ∇Φ ) ( x ) in row i i i and column j j j is ∂ j ( ∂ i Φ ) ( x ) = ∂ j ∂ i Φ ( x ) \partial_{j}(\partial_{i}\Phi)(x)=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Phi(x) ∂ j ( ∂ i Φ ) ( x ) = ∂ j ∂ i Φ ( x ) (clause 4 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set ), which is A j i ( x ) = A i j ( x ) A_{ji}(x)=A_{ij}(x) A ji ( x ) = A ij ( x ) by Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function and claim 1 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian . Since real matrices with the same entries are equal (Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §matrices ), D ( ∇ Φ ) ( x ) = D 2 Φ ( x ) D(\nabla\Phi)(x)=D^{2}\Phi(x) D ( ∇Φ ) ( x ) = D 2 Φ ( x ) .
By Invertibility of Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices , A ( x ) A(x) A ( x ) is invertible ; write B ( x ) = A ( x ) − 1 B(x)=A(x)^{-1} B ( x ) = A ( x ) − 1 . For every v ∈ R d v\in\mathbb{R}^{d} v ∈ R d , claim 2 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product gives A ( x ) ( B ( x ) v ) = ( A ( x ) B ( x ) ) v = I d v = v A(x)(B(x)v)=(A(x)B(x))v=I_{d}v=v A ( x ) ( B ( x ) v ) = ( A ( x ) B ( x )) v = I d v = v and B ( x ) ( A ( x ) v ) = v B(x)(A(x)v)=v B ( x ) ( A ( x ) v ) = v , where ( I d v ) i = ∑ j δ i j v j = v i (I_{d}v)_{i}=\sum_{j}\delta_{ij}v_{j}=v_{i} ( I d v ) i = ∑ j δ ij v j = v i by Identity Matrix , Matrix-Vector Product and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums .
Step 4 (A bound for the inverse). For all x , v ∈ R d x,v\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , v ∈ R d , ∥ B ( x ) v ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ v ∥ \lVert B(x)v\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert v\rVert ∥ B ( x ) v ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ v ∥ . Let w = B ( x ) v w=B(x)v w = B ( x ) v , so A ( x ) w = v A(x)w=v A ( x ) w = v (Step 3). By Claim 1, claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product ,
ε ∥ w ∥ 2 ≤ w ⋅ ( A ( x ) w ) = w ⋅ v ≤ ∥ w ∥ ∥ v ∥ . \varepsilon\lVert w\rVert^{2}\le w\cdot(A(x)w)=w\cdot v\le\lVert w\rVert\,\lVert v\rVert . ε ∥ w ∥ 2 ≤ w ⋅ ( A ( x ) w ) = w ⋅ v ≤ ∥ w ∥ ∥ v ∥ .
If w = 0 R d w=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} w = 0 R d the bound is clear, as ∥ w ∥ = 0 \lVert w\rVert=0 ∥ w ∥ = 0 and 0 ≤ ε − 1 ∥ v ∥ 0\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert v\rVert 0 ≤ ε − 1 ∥ v ∥ . Otherwise 0 < ∥ w ∥ 0<\lVert w\rVert 0 < ∥ w ∥ , and multiplying by ∥ w ∥ − 1 \lVert w\rVert^{-1} ∥ w ∥ − 1 and then by ε − 1 \varepsilon^{-1} ε − 1 , both positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , gives the bound by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field .
Step 5 (The inverse map is Lipschitz). By Step 2, ∇ Φ \nabla\Phi ∇Φ is a bijection of R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d onto R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d ; let G = ( ∇ Φ ) − 1 G=(\nabla\Phi)^{-1} G = ( ∇Φ ) − 1 , so ∇ Φ ( G ( y ) ) = y \nabla\Phi(G(y))=y ∇Φ ( G ( y )) = y and G ( ∇ Φ ( x ) ) = x G(\nabla\Phi(x))=x G ( ∇Φ ( x )) = x . For y , y ′ ∈ R d y,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y , y ′ ∈ R d , Step 1 applied to G ( y ) G(y) G ( y ) and G ( y ′ ) G(y') G ( y ′ ) gives ε ∥ G ( y ) − G ( y ′ ) ∥ ≤ ∥ y − y ′ ∥ \varepsilon\lVert G(y)-G(y')\rVert\le\lVert y-y'\rVert ε ∥ G ( y ) − G ( y ′ )∥ ≤ ∥ y − y ′ ∥ , hence, multiplying by ε − 1 \varepsilon^{-1} ε − 1 (claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ),
∥ G ( y ) − G ( y ′ ) ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ y − y ′ ∥ , ∣ G i ( y ) − G i ( y ′ ) ∣ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ y − y ′ ∥ ( i ∈ [ d ] ) , \lVert G(y)-G(y')\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert y-y'\rVert ,\qquad |G_{i}(y)-G_{i}(y')|\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert y-y'\rVert\quad(i\in[d]), ∥ G ( y ) − G ( y ′ )∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ y − y ′ ∥ , ∣ G i ( y ) − G i ( y ′ ) ∣ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ y − y ′ ∥ ( i ∈ [ d ]) ,
the second by claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n . Given y 0 y_{0} y 0 and η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 , every y y y with ∥ y − y 0 ∥ < ε η \lVert y-y_{0}\rVert<\varepsilon\eta ∥ y − y 0 ∥ < ε η satisfies ∣ G i ( y ) − G i ( y 0 ) ∣ < η |G_{i}(y)-G_{i}(y_{0})|<\eta ∣ G i ( y ) − G i ( y 0 ) ∣ < η (claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ), so each G i G_{i} G i is continuous at every point by Claim 3.
Step 6 (Differentiability of ∇ Φ \nabla\Phi ∇Φ ). Fix x 0 ∈ R d x_{0}\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x 0 ∈ R d and write A 0 = A ( x 0 ) A_{0}=A(x_{0}) A 0 = A ( x 0 ) . We show: for every real θ > 0 \theta>0 θ > 0 there is a real δ > 0 \delta>0 δ > 0 such that ∥ ∇ Φ ( x 0 + h ) − ∇ Φ ( x 0 ) − A 0 h ∥ ≤ θ ∥ h ∥ \lVert\nabla\Phi(x_{0}+h)-\nabla\Phi(x_{0})-A_{0}h\rVert\le\theta\lVert h\rVert ∥ ∇Φ ( x 0 + h ) − ∇Φ ( x 0 ) − A 0 h ∥ ≤ θ ∥ h ∥ whenever 0 < ∥ h ∥ < δ 0<\lVert h\rVert<\delta 0 < ∥ h ∥ < δ . For k ∈ [ d ] k\in[d] k ∈ [ d ] , since ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , A Real-Valued C^1 Function is Differentiable at Every Point shows that ∂ k Φ \partial_{k}\Phi ∂ k Φ is differentiable at x 0 x_{0} x 0 with derivative matrix the 1 × d 1\times d 1 × d matrix whose entry in column i i i is ∂ i ∂ k Φ ( x 0 ) = ( A 0 ) i k = ( A 0 ) k i \partial_{i}\partial_{k}\Phi(x_{0})=(A_{0})_{ik}=(A_{0})_{ki} ∂ i ∂ k Φ ( x 0 ) = ( A 0 ) ik = ( A 0 ) ki (Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function , symmetry of A 0 A_{0} A 0 ); the single coordinate of that matrix applied to h h h is ∑ i ( A 0 ) k i h i = ( A 0 h ) k \sum_{i}(A_{0})_{ki}h_{i}=(A_{0}h)_{k} ∑ i ( A 0 ) ki h i = ( A 0 h ) k . On R 1 \mathbb{R}^{1} R 1 the Euclidean norm is the absolute value: ∥ u ∥ 2 = u 2 = ∣ u ∣ 2 \lVert u\rVert^{2}=u^{2}=|u|^{2} ∥ u ∥ 2 = u 2 = ∣ u ∣ 2 with both nonnegative (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ), so ∥ u ∥ = ∣ u ∣ \lVert u\rVert=|u| ∥ u ∥ = ∣ u ∣ by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field . Hence Differentiability at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces , applied with the tolerance θ d − 1 \theta d^{-1} θ d − 1 , gives δ k > 0 \delta_{k}>0 δ k > 0 such that 0 < ∥ h ∥ < δ k 0<\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{k} 0 < ∥ h ∥ < δ k implies ∣ ∂ k Φ ( x 0 + h ) − ∂ k Φ ( x 0 ) − ( A 0 h ) k ∣ ≤ θ d − 1 ∥ h ∥ |\partial_{k}\Phi(x_{0}+h)-\partial_{k}\Phi(x_{0})-(A_{0}h)_{k}|\le\theta d^{-1}\lVert h\rVert ∣ ∂ k Φ ( x 0 + h ) − ∂ k Φ ( x 0 ) − ( A 0 h ) k ∣ ≤ θ d − 1 ∥ h ∥ . Let δ \delta δ be the least of δ 1 , … , δ d \delta_{1},\dots,\delta_{d} δ 1 , … , δ d (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , applied repeatedly). For 0 < ∥ h ∥ < δ 0<\lVert h\rVert<\delta 0 < ∥ h ∥ < δ , every coordinate of ∇ Φ ( x 0 + h ) − ∇ Φ ( x 0 ) − A 0 h \nabla\Phi(x_{0}+h)-\nabla\Phi(x_{0})-A_{0}h ∇Φ ( x 0 + h ) − ∇Φ ( x 0 ) − A 0 h is bounded in absolute value by θ d − 1 ∥ h ∥ \theta d^{-1}\lVert h\rVert θ d − 1 ∥ h ∥ , so Claim 4 gives the asserted bound d ⋅ θ d − 1 ∥ h ∥ = θ ∥ h ∥ d\cdot\theta d^{-1}\lVert h\rVert=\theta\lVert h\rVert d ⋅ θ d − 1 ∥ h ∥ = θ ∥ h ∥ .
Step 7 (Differentiability of G G G ). Fix y 0 ∈ R d y_{0}\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y 0 ∈ R d , let x 0 = G ( y 0 ) x_{0}=G(y_{0}) x 0 = G ( y 0 ) , A 0 = A ( x 0 ) A_{0}=A(x_{0}) A 0 = A ( x 0 ) and B 0 = B ( x 0 ) B_{0}=B(x_{0}) B 0 = B ( x 0 ) . Let η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 , put θ = η ε 2 > 0 \theta=\eta\varepsilon^{2}>0 θ = η ε 2 > 0 , take δ \delta δ from Step 6 for this θ \theta θ , and let 0 < ∥ k ∥ < ε δ 0<\lVert k\rVert<\varepsilon\delta 0 < ∥ k ∥ < ε δ . Put y = y 0 + k y=y_{0}+k y = y 0 + k and h = G ( y ) − x 0 h=G(y)-x_{0} h = G ( y ) − x 0 . As y ≠ y 0 y\ne y_{0} y = y 0 and G G G is injective, h ≠ 0 R d h\ne0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} h = 0 R d , so 0 < ∥ h ∥ 0<\lVert h\rVert 0 < ∥ h ∥ ; by Step 5, ∥ h ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ k ∥ < δ \lVert h\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert k\rVert<\delta ∥ h ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ k ∥ < δ . Since ∇ Φ ( x 0 + h ) = y \nabla\Phi(x_{0}+h)=y ∇Φ ( x 0 + h ) = y and ∇ Φ ( x 0 ) = y 0 \nabla\Phi(x_{0})=y_{0} ∇Φ ( x 0 ) = y 0 , Step 6 gives ∥ r ∥ ≤ θ ∥ h ∥ \lVert r\rVert\le\theta\lVert h\rVert ∥ r ∥ ≤ θ ∥ h ∥ for r = k − A 0 h r=k-A_{0}h r = k − A 0 h . By claims 1 and 2 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product and Step 3, B 0 r = B 0 k − B 0 ( A 0 h ) = B 0 k − h B_{0}r=B_{0}k-B_{0}(A_{0}h)=B_{0}k-h B 0 r = B 0 k − B 0 ( A 0 h ) = B 0 k − h , so
G ( y 0 + k ) − G ( y 0 ) − B 0 k = h − B 0 k = − B 0 r . G(y_{0}+k)-G(y_{0})-B_{0}k=h-B_{0}k=-B_{0}r . G ( y 0 + k ) − G ( y 0 ) − B 0 k = h − B 0 k = − B 0 r .
By claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , Step 4, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ,
∥ G ( y 0 + k ) − G ( y 0 ) − B 0 k ∥ = ∥ B 0 r ∥ ≤ ε − 1 θ ∥ h ∥ ≤ ε − 1 θ ε − 1 ∥ k ∥ = η ∥ k ∥ . \lVert G(y_{0}+k)-G(y_{0})-B_{0}k\rVert=\lVert B_{0}r\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\theta\lVert h\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\theta\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert k\rVert=\eta\lVert k\rVert . ∥ G ( y 0 + k ) − G ( y 0 ) − B 0 k ∥ = ∥ B 0 r ∥ ≤ ε − 1 θ ∥ h ∥ ≤ ε − 1 θ ε − 1 ∥ k ∥ = η ∥ k ∥ .
As R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d is open (claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and C k C^k C k Maps are Continuous ) and contains y 0 + k y_{0}+k y 0 + k , G G G is differentiable at y 0 y_{0} y 0 with derivative matrix B 0 B_{0} B 0 . By claim 1 of A Derivative Matrix is the Jacobian Matrix, and is Unique , ∂ j G i ( y 0 ) \partial_{j}G_{i}(y_{0}) ∂ j G i ( y 0 ) exists and equals ( B 0 ) i j (B_{0})_{ij} ( B 0 ) ij for all i , j ∈ [ d ] i,j\in[d] i , j ∈ [ d ] . Hence, for every x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d (take y 0 = ∇ Φ ( x ) y_{0}=\nabla\Phi(x) y 0 = ∇Φ ( x ) , so x 0 = x x_{0}=x x 0 = x ), the matrix D G ( ∇ Φ ( x ) ) DG(\nabla\Phi(x)) D G ( ∇Φ ( x )) has the same entries as B ( x ) B(x) B ( x ) , so it is the inverse matrix of D 2 Φ ( x ) D^{2}\Phi(x) D 2 Φ ( x ) .
Step 8 (Continuity of the partial derivatives of G G G ). Fix i , j ∈ [ d ] i,j\in[d] i , j ∈ [ d ] and y 0 ∈ R d y_{0}\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y 0 ∈ R d , with x 0 x_{0} x 0 , A 0 A_{0} A 0 , B 0 B_{0} B 0 as in Step 7; by Step 7, ∂ j G i ( y ) = B ( G ( y ) ) i j \partial_{j}G_{i}(y)=B(G(y))_{ij} ∂ j G i ( y ) = B ( G ( y ) ) ij for every y y y . For any real d × d d\times d d × d matrix M M M , ( M e j ) i = ∑ l M i l ( e j ) l = M i j (Me_{j})_{i}=\sum_{l}M_{il}(e_{j})_{l}=M_{ij} ( M e j ) i = ∑ l M i l ( e j ) l = M ij by Matrix-Vector Product , Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §basis and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums .
Let η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 and θ = η ε 2 ( 2 d 2 ) − 1 > 0 \theta=\eta\varepsilon^{2}(2d^{2})^{-1}>0 θ = η ε 2 ( 2 d 2 ) − 1 > 0 . For k , l ∈ [ d ] k,l\in[d] k , l ∈ [ d ] the function A k l = ∂ k ∂ l Φ A_{kl}=\partial_{k}\partial_{l}\Phi A k l = ∂ k ∂ l Φ is continuous at every point, by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set applied to the C 1 C^{1} C 1 function ∂ l Φ \partial_{l}\Phi ∂ l Φ , so by Claim 3 there is ρ k l > 0 \rho_{kl}>0 ρ k l > 0 with ∣ A k l ( x ) − A k l ( x 0 ) ∣ < θ |A_{kl}(x)-A_{kl}(x_{0})|<\theta ∣ A k l ( x ) − A k l ( x 0 ) ∣ < θ whenever ∥ x − x 0 ∥ < ρ k l \lVert x-x_{0}\rVert<\rho_{kl} ∥ x − x 0 ∥ < ρ k l . Let ρ \rho ρ be the least of the ρ k l \rho_{kl} ρ k l (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , applied repeatedly), and let ∥ y − y 0 ∥ < ε ρ \lVert y-y_{0}\rVert<\varepsilon\rho ∥ y − y 0 ∥ < ερ . With x = G ( y ) x=G(y) x = G ( y ) , Step 5 gives ∥ x − x 0 ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ y − y 0 ∥ < ρ \lVert x-x_{0}\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert y-y_{0}\rVert<\rho ∥ x − x 0 ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ y − y 0 ∥ < ρ . Write A 1 = A ( x ) A_{1}=A(x) A 1 = A ( x ) , B 1 = B ( x ) B_{1}=B(x) B 1 = B ( x ) and u = B 0 e j u=B_{0}e_{j} u = B 0 e j ; then A 0 u = e j A_{0}u=e_{j} A 0 u = e j (Step 3) and ∥ u ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ e j ∥ = ε − 1 \lVert u\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert e_{j}\rVert=\varepsilon^{-1} ∥ u ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ e j ∥ = ε − 1 (Step 4, Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §basis ). By Step 3 and claims 1 and 2 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product ,
B 1 e j − u = B 1 e j − B 1 ( A 1 u ) = B 1 ( A 0 u − A 1 u ) = B 1 ( ( A 0 − A 1 ) u ) , B_{1}e_{j}-u=B_{1}e_{j}-B_{1}(A_{1}u)=B_{1}(A_{0}u-A_{1}u)=B_{1}\bigl((A_{0}-A_{1})u\bigr), B 1 e j − u = B 1 e j − B 1 ( A 1 u ) = B 1 ( A 0 u − A 1 u ) = B 1 ( ( A 0 − A 1 ) u ) ,
the last step because ( ( A 0 − A 1 ) u ) k = ∑ l ( ( A 0 ) k l − ( A 1 ) k l ) u l = ( A 0 u ) k − ( A 1 u ) k ((A_{0}-A_{1})u)_{k}=\sum_{l}\bigl((A_{0})_{kl}-(A_{1})_{kl}\bigr)u_{l}=(A_{0}u)_{k}-(A_{1}u)_{k} (( A 0 − A 1 ) u ) k = ∑ l ( ( A 0 ) k l − ( A 1 ) k l ) u l = ( A 0 u ) k − ( A 1 u ) k by Difference of Real Matrices , Matrix-Vector Product and claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums . By claim 3 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product , ∥ ( A 0 − A 1 ) u ∥ ≤ C ∥ u ∥ \lVert(A_{0}-A_{1})u\rVert\le C\lVert u\rVert ∥( A 0 − A 1 ) u ∥ ≤ C ∥ u ∥ with C = ∥ ( c 1 , … , c d ) ∥ C=\lVert(c_{1},\dots,c_{d})\rVert C = ∥( c 1 , … , c d )∥ and c k = ∑ l ∣ ( A 0 ) k l − ( A 1 ) k l ∣ c_{k}=\sum_{l}|(A_{0})_{kl}-(A_{1})_{kl}| c k = ∑ l ∣ ( A 0 ) k l − ( A 1 ) k l ∣ ; here 0 ≤ c k ≤ d θ 0\le c_{k}\le d\theta 0 ≤ c k ≤ d θ by claims 2, 3 and 5 of Properties of Finite Sums , so C ≤ d 2 θ C\le d^{2}\theta C ≤ d 2 θ by Claim 4. By Step 4 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ,
∥ B 1 e j − u ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥ ( A 0 − A 1 ) u ∥ ≤ ε − 1 d 2 θ ε − 1 = η 2 . \lVert B_{1}e_{j}-u\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert(A_{0}-A_{1})u\rVert\le\varepsilon^{-1}d^{2}\theta\,\varepsilon^{-1}=\tfrac{\eta}{2}. ∥ B 1 e j − u ∥ ≤ ε − 1 ∥( A 0 − A 1 ) u ∥ ≤ ε − 1 d 2 θ ε − 1 = 2 η .
Therefore, by claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ,
∣ ∂ j G i ( y ) − ∂ j G i ( y 0 ) ∣ = ∣ ( B 1 e j ) i − ( B 0 e j ) i ∣ = ∣ ( B 1 e j − u ) i ∣ ≤ η 2 < η , |\partial_{j}G_{i}(y)-\partial_{j}G_{i}(y_{0})|=|(B_{1}e_{j})_{i}-(B_{0}e_{j})_{i}|=|(B_{1}e_{j}-u)_{i}|\le\tfrac{\eta}{2}<\eta , ∣ ∂ j G i ( y ) − ∂ j G i ( y 0 ) ∣ = ∣ ( B 1 e j ) i − ( B 0 e j ) i ∣ = ∣ ( B 1 e j − u ) i ∣ ≤ 2 η < η ,
and ∂ j G i \partial_{j}G_{i} ∂ j G i is continuous at y 0 y_{0} y 0 by Claim 3.
Step 9 (Proof of lem:gradient-diffeomorphism-strongly-convex-2026a#inverse). Step 3 gives the positive definiteness of D 2 Φ ( x ) D^{2}\Phi(x) D 2 Φ ( x ) and D ( ∇ Φ ) ( x ) = D 2 Φ ( x ) D(\nabla\Phi)(x)=D^{2}\Phi(x) D ( ∇Φ ) ( x ) = D 2 Φ ( x ) . For each i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] , the component G i G_{i} G i is continuous at every point (Step 5), and for each j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] its partial derivative ∂ j G i \partial_{j}G_{i} ∂ j G i exists at every point (Step 7) and is continuous at every point (Step 8); by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set , read through clause 3 there, G i G_{i} G i is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d . Finally, Step 7 shows that D G ( ∇ Φ ( x ) ) DG(\nabla\Phi(x)) D G ( ∇Φ ( x )) is the inverse matrix of D 2 Φ ( x ) D^{2}\Phi(x) D 2 Φ ( x ) for every x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d .