TheoremBase

Proof of Wasserstein Convergence from Weak Convergence with Uniformly Integrable Second Moments, and Wasserstein Compactness under a Superquadratic Moment Bound

lemmalem:w2-compactness-superquadratic-moment-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 15,865 chars · 39 deps · depth 31 Reason: E1: proof of W2 convergence and compactness via an explicit partition-of-unity coupling.

Uniform tails give a finite second moment for the limit; a coupling built cell by cell from a fine partition of unity on a large ball, with the unmatched mass coupled independently, has small cost. Compactness follows from tightness, Prokhorov and the first part.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules for adding, multiplying and comparing inequalities between real numbers in Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, are used without further mention. Couplings, Π\Pi, the quadratic cost II, M2M_{2} and W2W_{2} are those of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §dimensions in dimension mm; pr1,pr2:Rm+mRm\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2}:\mathbb{R}^{m+m}\to\mathbb{R}^{m} are the coordinate projections and ι=ιm,m\iota=\iota^{m,m} the concatenation map of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs. For real L>0L>0 put EL={xRm:L<x}E_{L}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{m}:L<\lVert x\rVert\}; it is Borel, being the preimage of the open set {tR:L<t}\{t\in\mathbb{R}:L<t\} (Borel by claims 4 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets) under the Borel map xxx\mapsto\lVert x\rVert of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions; and for ρP(Rm)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) we write ELx2ρ(dx)\int_{E_{L}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\rho(dx) for Rmx21EL(x)ρ(dx)[0,]\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}(x)\,\rho(dx)\in[0,\infty]. Nonnegative Borel functions are integrated in [0,][0,\infty] as in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures, and every bounded Borel function is integrable against every member of P(Rm)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by that clause.

Part 1 (clause 1). Let (μn)nN(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} and μ\mu be as in clause 1.

Step 1 (A continuous cutoff). For x,xRmx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, claims 2, 5 and 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n give xxxx=dE(x,x)\bigl|\lVert x\rVert-\lVert x'\rVert\bigr|\le\lVert x-x'\rVert=d_{E}(x,x'), so xxx\mapsto\lVert x\rVert is Lipschitz, hence continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous. For real KK define χK(x)=min{1,max{0,xK}}\chi_{K}(x)=\min\{1,\max\{0,\lVert x\rVert-K\}\}. By claims 1, 2 and 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space and claim 4 of Continuity of the Absolute Value, Maximum and Minimum of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, χK\chi_{K} is continuous; by Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements and Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements, 0χK10\le\chi_{K}\le1, χK(x)=0\chi_{K}(x)=0 when xK\lVert x\rVert\le K, and χK(x)=1\chi_{K}(x)=1 when K+1xK+1\le\lVert x\rVert.

Step 2 (Uniform tails, and μP2(Rm)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{m})). We show:

(\star) for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a real L>0L>0 with ELx2ρ(dx)ε\int_{E_{L}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\rho(dx)\le\varepsilon for ρ=μ\rho=\mu and for ρ=μn\rho=\mu_{n}, every nNn\in\mathbb{N}; and M2(μ)L2+εM_{2}(\mu)\le L^{2}+\varepsilon.

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and let K>0K>0 be given by the hypothesis of clause 1. For jNj\in\mathbb{N} let fj(x)=min{j,x2χK(x)}f_{j}(x)=\min\{j,\lVert x\rVert^{2}\chi_{K}(x)\}; it is continuous (Step 1 and the continuity results cited there, x2=xx\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\lVert x\rVert\,\lVert x\rVert) with 0fjj0\le f_{j}\le j, hence bounded. Since χK\chi_{K} vanishes off EKE_{K} and χK1\chi_{K}\le1, fjx21EKf_{j}\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{E_{K}} pointwise, so claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives fjdμnEKx2μn(dx)<ε\int f_{j}\,d\mu_{n}\le\int_{E_{K}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu_{n}(dx)<\varepsilon for every nn. By the definition of weak convergence, (fjdμn)n(\int f_{j}\,d\mu_{n})_{n} converges to fjdμ\int f_{j}\,d\mu, so fjdμε\int f_{j}\,d\mu\le\varepsilon by claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences. The sequence (fj)j(f_{j})_{j} is nondecreasing and, for each xx, claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers gives jj with x2χK(x)<j\lVert x\rVert^{2}\chi_{K}(x)<j, so supjfj(x)=x2χK(x)\sup_{j}f_{j}(x)=\lVert x\rVert^{2}\chi_{K}(x); by Monotone Convergence Theorem, x2χK(x)μ(dx)ε\int\lVert x\rVert^{2}\chi_{K}(x)\,\mu(dx)\le\varepsilon. Put L=K+1L=K+1. By Step 1, x21EL(x)x2χK(x)\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}(x)\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}\chi_{K}(x), so ELx2μ(dx)ε\int_{E_{L}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)\le\varepsilon; and ELEKE_{L}\subseteq E_{K} gives ELx2μn(dx)<ε\int_{E_{L}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu_{n}(dx)<\varepsilon for every nn. Finally x2L2+x21EL(x)\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le L^{2}+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}(x) for every xx (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field when xL\lVert x\rVert\le L), so M2(μ)L2+ε<M_{2}(\mu)\le L^{2}+\varepsilon<\infty by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. This proves (\star); in particular μP2(Rm)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space.

Step 3 (A partition of unity; order of choices). Fix a real ε>0\varepsilon>0. Choose L>0L>0 by (\star) for this ε\varepsilon, and put η=ε>0\eta=\sqrt{\varepsilon}>0. Let C={x:xL}C=\{x:\lVert x\rVert\le L\}, the closed ball of (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}) with centre 00 and radius LL (claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n). It is closed and bounded by claims 3 and 2 of Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space, hence compact by Heine-Borel Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The open balls B(z,η/2)B(z,\eta/2), zCz\in C, are open by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open and cover CC, so Compact Subset Criterion via Open Covers in the Ambient Space yields a finite JCJ\subseteq C with CzJB(z,η/2)C\subseteq\bigcup_{z\in J}B(z,\eta/2); JJ\neq\emptyset because 0C0\in C, so JJ has kk elements for some natural number k1k\ge1, which we enumerate as z1,,zkz_{1},\dots,z_{k}. Apply Continuous Partition of Unity Subordinate to a Finite Open Cover of a Compact Set in a Metric Space with X=RmX=\mathbb{R}^{m}, d=dEd=d_{E}, this CC, n=kn=k and Ui=B(zi,η/2)U_{i}=B(z_{i},\eta/2): it gives continuous φi:Rm[0,1]\varphi_{i}:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to[0,1] and closed DiUiD_{i}\subseteq U_{i} (i[k]i\in[k]) with φi=0\varphi_{i}=0 off DiD_{i} (its claims 1 and 2), i=1kφi1\sum_{i=1}^{k}\varphi_{i}\le1 everywhere (claim 3) and i=1kφi=1\sum_{i=1}^{k}\varphi_{i}=1 on CC (claim 4). Put φ0=1i=1kφi\varphi_{0}=1-\sum_{i=1}^{k}\varphi_{i}; it is continuous, 0φ010\le\varphi_{0}\le1, and φ0=0\varphi_{0}=0 on CC, so φ01EL\varphi_{0}\le\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}. Each φi\varphi_{i} is Borel by claims 3(a) and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets.

(P) If i[k]i\in[k] and φi(x)φi(y)0\varphi_{i}(x)\varphi_{i}(y)\neq0, then x,yDiB(zi,η/2)x,y\in D_{i}\subseteq B(z_{i},\eta/2), so xyxzi+ziy<η\lVert x-y\rVert\le\lVert x-z_{i}\rVert+\lVert z_{i}-y\rVert<\eta by claims 2, 5 and 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and xy2η2=ε\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}\le\eta^{2}=\varepsilon by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Step 4 (Masses of the cells; choice of NN). For nNn\in\mathbb{N} and i{0,1,,k}i\in\{0,1,\dots,k\} put ain=φidμna_{i}^{n}=\int\varphi_{i}\,d\mu_{n} and ai=φidμa_{i}=\int\varphi_{i}\,d\mu, numbers in [0,1][0,1]; by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, i=0kain=1=i=0kai\sum_{i=0}^{k}a_{i}^{n}=1=\sum_{i=0}^{k}a_{i}. For i[k]i\in[k] let cin=min{ain,ai}c_{i}^{n}=\min\{a_{i}^{n},a_{i}\} and let δn=1i=1kcin\delta_{n}=1-\sum_{i=1}^{k}c_{i}^{n}; since cinainc_{i}^{n}\le a_{i}^{n}, δna0n0\delta_{n}\ge a_{0}^{n}\ge0. By weak convergence (ain)n(a_{i}^{n})_{n} converges to aia_{i} for every ii; since cinaiainai|c_{i}^{n}-a_{i}|\le|a_{i}^{n}-a_{i}| (if ainaia_{i}^{n}\ge a_{i} the left side is 00, otherwise the two sides agree), claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences gives cinaic_{i}^{n}\to a_{i}, and claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences give δn1i=1kai=a0\delta_{n}\to1-\sum_{i=1}^{k}a_{i}=a_{0}. As φ01ELL2x21EL\varphi_{0}\le\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}\le L^{-2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}, claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and (\star) give a0ε/L2a_{0}\le\varepsilon/L^{2}. Choose NNN\in\mathbb{N} with δna0<ε/L2|\delta_{n}-a_{0}|<\varepsilon/L^{2} for nNn\ge N (Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers); then L2δn2εL^{2}\delta_{n}\le2\varepsilon for nNn\ge N.

Step 5 (A coupling of μn\mu_{n} and μ\mu). Fix nNn\in\mathbb{N}. For i[k]i\in[k] let wi=cin/(ainai)w_{i}=c_{i}^{n}/(a_{i}^{n}a_{i}) if cin>0c_{i}^{n}>0 (then ain,aicin>0a_{i}^{n},a_{i}\ge c_{i}^{n}>0) and wi=0w_{i}=0 otherwise; in both cases wi0w_{i}\ge0, wiainai=cinw_{i}a_{i}^{n}a_{i}=c_{i}^{n}, 0wiai10\le w_{i}a_{i}\le1 and 0wiain10\le w_{i}a_{i}^{n}\le1. Let e=1/δne=1/\delta_{n} if δn>0\delta_{n}>0 and e=0e=0 if δn=0\delta_{n}=0, so that eδn{0,1}e\delta_{n}\in\{0,1\} and eδn=1e\delta_{n}=1 when δn>0\delta_{n}>0. Define

g=φ0+i=1k(1wiai)φi,h=φ0+i=1k(1wiain)φig=\varphi_{0}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}(1-w_{i}a_{i})\varphi_{i},\qquad h=\varphi_{0}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}(1-w_{i}a_{i}^{n})\varphi_{i}

on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. They are Borel with 0g10\le g\le1 and 0h10\le h\le1 (as φ0+iφi=1\varphi_{0}+\sum_{i}\varphi_{i}=1), and

1g=i=1kwiaiφi,1h=i=1kwiainφi,gdμn=δn=hdμ,(E1)1-g=\sum_{i=1}^{k}w_{i}a_{i}\varphi_{i},\qquad1-h=\sum_{i=1}^{k}w_{i}a_{i}^{n}\varphi_{i},\qquad\int g\,d\mu_{n}=\delta_{n}=\int h\,d\mu,\tag{E1}

the integrals by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral: gdμn=a0n+i(aincin)=1icin\int g\,d\mu_{n}=a_{0}^{n}+\sum_{i}(a_{i}^{n}-c_{i}^{n})=1-\sum_{i}c_{i}^{n}, and likewise for hh. Define G:Rm+m[0,)G:\mathbb{R}^{m+m}\to[0,\infty) by

G(z)=i=1kwiφi(pr1(z))φi(pr2(z))+eg(pr1(z))h(pr2(z)),G(z)=\sum_{i=1}^{k}w_{i}\,\varphi_{i}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))\,\varphi_{i}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))+e\,g(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))\,h(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)),

Borel because the projections are Borel (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections), compositions of Borel maps are Borel (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps), and by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Let γ\gamma be the measure on B(Rm+m)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m+m}) with density GG with respect to μnμ\mu_{n}\boxtimes\mu, given by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. For every Borel F:Rm+m[0,]F:\mathbb{R}^{m+m}\to[0,\infty], that claim, Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product and the Tonelli part of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems give

Fdγ=Rm(RmF(ι(x,y))G(ι(x,y))μ(dy))μn(dx),(E2)\int F\,d\gamma=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}F(\iota(x,y))\,G(\iota(x,y))\,\mu(dy)\Bigr)\mu_{n}(dx),\tag{E2}

and the same with the order of integration reversed; here G(ι(x,y))=iwiφi(x)φi(y)+eg(x)h(y)G(\iota(x,y))=\sum_{i}w_{i}\varphi_{i}(x)\varphi_{i}(y)+e\,g(x)h(y).

Marginals. Let AB(Rm)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) and F=1Apr1=1pr11(A)F=\mathbf{1}_{A}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}=\mathbf{1}_{\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A)}. By claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and (E1), the inner integral in (E2) is 1A(x)(iwiaiφi(x)+eδng(x))=1A(x)(1g(x)+eδng(x))\mathbf{1}_{A}(x)\bigl(\sum_{i}w_{i}a_{i}\varphi_{i}(x)+e\delta_{n}g(x)\bigr)=\mathbf{1}_{A}(x)\bigl(1-g(x)+e\delta_{n}g(x)\bigr). If δn>0\delta_{n}>0 this is 1A(x)\mathbf{1}_{A}(x), and γ(pr11(A))=μn(A)\gamma(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A))=\mu_{n}(A). If δn=0\delta_{n}=0 it is 1A(1g)\mathbf{1}_{A}(1-g), whose integral is μn(A)1Agdμn\mu_{n}(A)-\int\mathbf{1}_{A}g\,d\mu_{n} by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and 01Agdμngdμn=δn=00\le\int\mathbf{1}_{A}g\,d\mu_{n}\le\int g\,d\mu_{n}=\delta_{n}=0; again γ(pr11(A))=μn(A)\gamma(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A))=\mu_{n}(A). The same computation in the reversed order, with hh, μ\mu and the second identity of (E1), gives γ(pr21(A))=μ(A)\gamma(\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(A))=\mu(A). Taking A=RmA=\mathbb{R}^{m} shows γ(Rm+m)=1\gamma(\mathbb{R}^{m+m})=1, so γP(Rm+m)\gamma\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{m+m}) and γΠ(μn,μ)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling.

Step 6 (The cost of γ\gamma). By Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost and (E2), I(γ)= ⁣xy2G(ι(x,y))μ(dy)μn(dx)I(\gamma)=\int\!\int\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}G(\iota(x,y))\,\mu(dy)\,\mu_{n}(dx), using pr1(ι(x,y))=x\mathrm{pr}_{1}(\iota(x,y))=x, pr2(ι(x,y))=y\mathrm{pr}_{2}(\iota(x,y))=y. By (P) and the inequality xy22x2+2y2\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\lVert y\rVert^{2} of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions,

xy2G(ι(x,y))εi=1kwiφi(x)φi(y)+2e(x2+y2)g(x)h(y).\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}G(\iota(x,y))\le\varepsilon\sum_{i=1}^{k}w_{i}\varphi_{i}(x)\varphi_{i}(y)+2e\bigl(\lVert x\rVert^{2}+\lVert y\rVert^{2}\bigr)g(x)h(y).

Integrating first in yy and then in xx with claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and (E1),

I(γ)εi=1kwiainai+2eδn(An+Bn)ε+2(An+Bn),I(\gamma)\le\varepsilon\sum_{i=1}^{k}w_{i}a_{i}^{n}a_{i}+2e\delta_{n}(A_{n}+B_{n})\le\varepsilon+2(A_{n}+B_{n}),

where An=x2g(x)μn(dx)A_{n}=\int\lVert x\rVert^{2}g(x)\,\mu_{n}(dx) and Bn=y2h(y)μ(dy)B_{n}=\int\lVert y\rVert^{2}h(y)\,\mu(dy) in [0,][0,\infty], and we used iwiainai=iciniain1\sum_{i}w_{i}a_{i}^{n}a_{i}=\sum_{i}c_{i}^{n}\le\sum_{i}a_{i}^{n}\le1 and eδn1e\delta_{n}\le1. Since 0g10\le g\le1, x2g(x)L2g(x)+x21EL(x)\lVert x\rVert^{2}g(x)\le L^{2}g(x)+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{E_{L}}(x) for every xx (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field when xL\lVert x\rVert\le L); so AnL2δn+εA_{n}\le L^{2}\delta_{n}+\varepsilon by (E1) and (\star), and in the same way BnL2δn+εB_{n}\le L^{2}\delta_{n}+\varepsilon. By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance, for nNn\ge N (Step 4),

W2(μn,μ)2I(γ)ε+4(L2δn+ε)13ε.W_{2}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\le I(\gamma)\le\varepsilon+4(L^{2}\delta_{n}+\varepsilon)\le13\,\varepsilon .

Step 7 (Conclusion of Part 1). Let ε>0\varepsilon'>0 and run Steps 3 to 6 with ε=ε2/26\varepsilon=\varepsilon'^{2}/26 (the choices being made in the order ε\varepsilon, LL, η\eta, the cover and φ0,,φk\varphi_{0},\dots,\varphi_{k}, then NN, and the coupling for each nNn\ge N). For nNn\ge N, W2(μn,μ)2ε2/2<ε2W_{2}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\le\varepsilon'^{2}/2<\varepsilon'^{2}, so 0W2(μn,μ)<ε0\le W_{2}(\mu_{n},\mu)<\varepsilon' by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Hence (W2(μn,μ))n(W_{2}(\mu_{n},\mu))_{n} has limit 00; with Step 2 this proves clause 1.

Part 2 (clause 2). Let hh, cc and (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} be as in clause 2, let bb be a real number with bh(x)b\le h(x) for every xx, and put b=min{b,0}b'=\min\{b,0\} and C0=cbC_{0}=c-b'. For real M>0M>0 let KM>0K_{M}>0 be given by superquadraticity and FM={x:KMx}F_{M}=\{x:K_{M}\le\lVert x\rVert\}, which is Borel as the complement of the preimage of the open set {t:t<KM}\{t:t<K_{M}\} under the Borel norm. Fix MM and nn. The functions h1FMh\mathbf{1}_{F_{M}} and h1RmFMh\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus F_{M}} are Borel (claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) with absolute values at most h|h|, hence μn\mu_{n}-integrable by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral; their sum is hh, and h1RmFMbh\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus F_{M}}\ge b' pointwise because b0b'\le0 and bbb'\le b. By claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

h1FMdμn=hdμnh1RmFMdμncb=C0.\int h\mathbf{1}_{F_{M}}\,d\mu_{n}=\int h\,d\mu_{n}-\int h\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus F_{M}}\,d\mu_{n}\le c-b'=C_{0}.

On FMF_{M}, 0Mx2h(x)0\le M\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le h(x), so 0Mx21FMh1FM0\le M\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{F_{M}}\le h\mathbf{1}_{F_{M}} pointwise; the latter is nonnegative, so its integral in [0,][0,\infty] is its Lebesgue integral (Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral), and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives

MRmx21FM(x)μn(dx)C0(nN),(E3)M\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{F_{M}}(x)\,\mu_{n}(dx)\le C_{0}\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}),\tag{E3}

and in particular C00C_{0}\ge0.

(i) With M=1M=1: x2K12+x21F1(x)\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le K_{1}^{2}+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{F_{1}}(x) for every xx, so M2(μn)K12+C0M_{2}(\mu_{n})\le K_{1}^{2}+C_{0} for every nn. By Tightness from Bounded Second Moments, and Tightness of the Couplings of Two Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment the set {μn:nN}\{\mu_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\} is tight in (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}), that is, the sequence is tight in the sense of Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence. By Prokhorov's Theorem on Euclidean Space: a Tight Sequence of Probability Measures Has a Weakly Convergent Subsequence there are a strictly increasing sequence (nj)jN(n_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N} and μP(Rm)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) such that (μnj)j(\mu_{n_{j}})_{j} converges weakly to μ\mu.

(ii) Let ε>0\varepsilon>0, put M=(C0+1)/ε>0M=(C_{0}+1)/\varepsilon>0 and K=KMK=K_{M}. Since EKFME_{K}\subseteq F_{M}, (E3) gives EKx2μnj(dx)C0/M=C0ε/(C0+1)<ε\int_{E_{K}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu_{n_{j}}(dx)\le C_{0}/M=C_{0}\varepsilon/(C_{0}+1)<\varepsilon for every jj.

Thus the sequence (μnj)jN(\mu_{n_{j}})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} in P2(Rm)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) and μ\mu satisfy the hypotheses of clause 1, and Part 1 gives μP2(Rm)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) and that (W2(μnj,μ))jN(W_{2}(\mu_{n_{j}},\mu))_{j\in\mathbb{N}} has limit 00. With (nj)j(n_{j})_{j} as the strictly increasing sequence named (nk)k(n_{k})_{k} in clause 2, this proves clause 2.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…