TheoremBase

Partial sums are combinations of coordinate functions, hence Borel; the convergence set is Borel by the Cauchy criterion, and the functional is a pointwise limit of indicator times partial sums. On basis vectors the partial sums are eventually constant. For Cameron-Martin h, gammacgamma_c is the law of the random series Y; along Y the partial sums are those of the independent centred series sum (hk/sqrt(ck))h_k/sqrt(c_k)) xikxi_k, so Kolmogorov's series theorem gives a.s. and mean-square convergence and the moments, transferred to gammacgamma_c by change of variables.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, for h∈Xh\in X let DhD_{h} denote the set of those x∈Xx\in X for which the real sequence (ℓh,n(x))n∈N(\ell_{h,n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges. A real-valued function on XX is Borel when it is measurable with respect to B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), as in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §measures; by claim 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space the latter is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) of the real line, so a Borel function on XX is a measurable real-valued function on the measurable space (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) in the sense of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and conversely.

Step 1 (the partial sums are Borel). Fix h∈Xh\in X and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By the definition of the partial sums, ℓh,n(x)=∑k=1n(hk/ck) xk\ell_{h,n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(h_{k}/c_{k})\,x_{k} for every x∈Xx\in X, where each ckc_{k} is positive by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances; thus ℓh,n\ell_{h,n} is the linear combination, with the real coefficients h1/c1,…,hn/cnh_{1}/c_{1},\dots,h_{n}/c_{n}, of the coordinate functions x↦x1,…,x↦xnx\mapsto x_{1},\dots,x\mapsto x_{n}. Each coordinate function is Lipschitz, hence Borel, by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, and therefore ℓh,n\ell_{h,n} is Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions.

Step 2 (the convergence set is Borel). Fix h∈Xh\in X. For r,m,n∈Nr,m,n\in\mathbb{N} put um,n=∣ℓh,m−ℓh,n∣u_{m,n}=|\ell_{h,m}-\ell_{h,n}|, a Borel function by Step 1 and claims 2 and 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and

Ar,m,n={x∈X:um,n(x)≤1/r}=X∖um,n−1((1/r,∞)).A_{r,m,n}=\{x\in X:u_{m,n}(x)\le 1/r\}=X\setminus u_{m,n}^{-1}\bigl((1/r,\infty)\bigr).

The open interval (1/r,∞)(1/r,\infty) is an open subset of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), hence a Borel set by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, so its preimage under the Borel function um,nu_{m,n} lies in B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), and so does its complement Ar,m,nA_{r,m,n}, because B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) is a σ\sigma-algebra by Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Metric Space. We claim

Dh=⋂r∈N ⋃N∈N ⋂m≥N ⋂n≥NAr,m,n.D_{h}=\bigcap_{r\in\mathbb{N}}\ \bigcup_{N\in\mathbb{N}}\ \bigcap_{m\ge N}\ \bigcap_{n\ge N}A_{r,m,n}.

Let x∈Xx\in X and write an=ℓh,n(x)a_{n}=\ell_{h,n}(x). The point xx lies in the right-hand side exactly when for every r∈Nr\in\mathbb{N} there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣am−an∣≤1/r|a_{m}-a_{n}|\le1/r for all m,n≥Nm,n\ge N. If (an)(a_{n}) converges to a real number aa, then for r∈Nr\in\mathbb{N} there is NN with ∣an−a∣<1/(2r)|a_{n}-a|<1/(2r) for n≥Nn\ge N, whence ∣am−an∣<1/r|a_{m}-a_{n}|<1/r for m,n≥Nm,n\ge N; so xx lies in the right-hand side. Conversely, if xx lies in the right-hand side, then for every positive real ε\varepsilon choose r∈Nr\in\mathbb{N} with 1/r<ε1/r<\varepsilon and the corresponding NN, so that ∣am−an∣<ε|a_{m}-a_{n}|<\varepsilon for m,n≥Nm,n\ge N; thus (an)(a_{n}) is a Cauchy sequence and converges by Every Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers Converges, that is, x∈Dhx\in D_{h}. The right-hand side is formed from members of B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) by countable intersections and countable unions, so Dh∈B(X)D_{h}\in\mathcal{B}(X).

Step 3 (the functional is Borel; claim 1). Fix h∈Xh\in X. The indicator 1Dh\mathbf{1}_{D_{h}} is Borel by Step 2 and claim 1 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, so each product fn=1Dh ℓh,nf_{n}=\mathbf{1}_{D_{h}}\,\ell_{h,n} is Borel by Step 1 and claim 3 of that lemma. For every x∈Xx\in X the sequence (fn(x))n∈N(f_{n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ℓh(x)\ell_{h}(x): if x∈Dhx\in D_{h} then fn(x)=ℓh,n(x)f_{n}(x)=\ell_{h,n}(x) for every nn and the limit is ℓh(x)\ell_{h}(x) by the definition of the Paley-Wiener functional; if x∉Dhx\notin D_{h} then fn(x)=0f_{n}(x)=0 for every nn and ℓh(x)=0\ell_{h}(x)=0 by the same definition. Hence ℓh\ell_{h} is Borel by claim 5 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Together with Steps 1 and 2 this proves claim 1.

Step 4 (basis vectors; claim 2). Fix k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and x∈Xx\in X, and take h=ekh=e_{k}. Since (ej)j∈N(e_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} is an orthonormal basis, it is an orthonormal sequence, so the coordinates of eke_{k} are ⟨ek,ej⟩=0\langle e_{k},e_{j}\rangle=0 for j≠kj\ne k and ⟨ek,ek⟩=∣ek∣2=1\langle e_{k},e_{k}\rangle=|e_{k}|^{2}=1. Hence ℓek,n(x)=0\ell_{e_{k},n}(x)=0 for n<kn<k and ℓek,n(x)=xk/ck\ell_{e_{k},n}(x)=x_{k}/c_{k} for every n≥kn\ge k. The real sequence (ℓek,n(x))n∈N(\ell_{e_{k},n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is therefore constant from the index kk on, so it converges to xk/ckx_{k}/c_{k}; thus x∈Dekx\in D_{e_{k}} and ℓek(x)=xk/ck\ell_{e_{k}}(x)=x_{k}/c_{k} by The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Vector Relative to a Variance Sequence §functional.

Step 5 (a random series realising γc\gamma_{c}). The standard normal distribution NN of Standard Normal Distribution is a probability measure on (R,B(R))(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})), so by Existence of Independent and Identically Distributed Sequences there are a probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) and an independent and identically distributed sequence (ξk)k∈N(\xi_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} of random variables on it with common distribution NN; that is, (ξk)(\xi_{k}) is an independent sequence of standard normal random variables. Let GG and Y:Ω→XY:\Omega\to X be the event and the map attached to these data in The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections, with ck\sqrt{c_{k}} the nonnegative square root of ckc_{k} (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root), which satisfies (ck)2=ck(\sqrt{c_{k}})^{2}=c_{k} and is positive because ck>0c_{k}>0 (if it were 00, then ck=0c_{k}=0). By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §convergence, G∈FG\in\mathcal{F} and P(G)=1P(G)=1; by The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §random-element, YY is a random element of (X,d)(X,d), that is, measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), and ⟨Y(ω),ek⟩=ck ξk(ω)\langle Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega) for all ω∈G\omega\in G and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, γc\gamma_{c} is the unique μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) with (pn)#μ=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\mu=\gamma_{c^{(n)}} for every nn, and by The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §unique this μ\mu is the law PYP_{Y} of YY. Thus γc=PY\gamma_{c}=P_{Y}, the image measure of PP under YY on (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) given by γc(B)=P(Y−1(B))\gamma_{c}(B)=P(Y^{-1}(B)) for B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X), as in Random Element of a Metric Space and Its Law. Consequently, by claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables (with T=YT=Y and μT=PY=γc\mu_{T}=P_{Y}=\gamma_{c}), for every Borel g:X→Rg:X\to\mathbb{R}: if g≥0g\ge0 then ∫Xg dγc=∫Ωg∘Y dP\int_{X}g\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}g\circ Y\,dP in [0,∞][0,\infty]; and gg is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} if and only if g∘Yg\circ Y is integrable with respect to PP, in which case ∫Xg dγc=∫Ωg∘Y dP\int_{X}g\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}g\circ Y\,dP. For every Borel g:X→Rg:X\to\mathbb{R} the function g∘Yg\circ Y is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claims 4 and 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, that is, a random variable.

Step 6 (the scaled coordinates satisfy Kolmogorov's hypotheses). Fix h∈Hch\in H_{c} and put bk=hk/ckb_{k}=h_{k}/\sqrt{c_{k}} and ηk=bk ξk\eta_{k}=b_{k}\,\xi_{k} for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Each ηk\eta_{k} is a random variable and is square-integrable, since ξk\xi_{k} is square-integrable by claim 1 of Moments and Stability of the Standard Normal Distribution and scalar multiples of (square-integrable) random variables are again such by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. The sequence (ηk)(\eta_{k}) is independent: let k1,…,krk_{1},\dots,k_{r} be distinct natural numbers and B1,…,BrB_{1},\dots,B_{r} Borel sets; the map t↦bkitt\mapsto b_{k_{i}}t on R\mathbb{R} is continuous for dRd_{\mathbb{R}}, hence measurable with respect to B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claims 3 and 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, so Bi′={t∈R:bkit∈Bi}B_{i}'=\{t\in\mathbb{R}:b_{k_{i}}t\in B_{i}\} is a Borel set and {ηki∈Bi}={ξki∈Bi′}\{\eta_{k_{i}}\in B_{i}\}=\{\xi_{k_{i}}\in B_{i}'\}; the events {ξk1∈B1′},…,{ξkr∈Br′}\{\xi_{k_{1}}\in B_{1}'\},\dots,\{\xi_{k_{r}}\in B_{r}'\} are independent because (ξk)(\xi_{k}) is an independent sequence, and this is exactly the independence of ηk1,…,ηkr\eta_{k_{1}},\dots,\eta_{k_{r}} in the sense of Independence of Events and of Random Variables. By claim 1 of Moments and Stability of the Standard Normal Distribution, ξk\xi_{k} and ξk2\xi_{k}^{2} are integrable with E[ξk]=0\mathbb{E}[\xi_{k}]=0 and E[ξk2]=1\mathbb{E}[\xi_{k}^{2}]=1; since ηk2=bk2 ξk2\eta_{k}^{2}=b_{k}^{2}\,\xi_{k}^{2} pointwise, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable gives

E[ηk]=bk E[ξk]=0,E[ηk2]=bk2 E[ξk2]=hk2ck,\mathbb{E}[\eta_{k}]=b_{k}\,\mathbb{E}[\xi_{k}]=0,\qquad\mathbb{E}[\eta_{k}^{2}]=b_{k}^{2}\,\mathbb{E}[\xi_{k}^{2}]=\frac{h_{k}^{2}}{c_{k}},

using (ck)2=ck(\sqrt{c_{k}})^{2}=c_{k}; for the nonnegative integrable functions ξk2\xi_{k}^{2} and ηk2\eta_{k}^{2} the two readings of the expectation agree, since the negative part is 00, with integral 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral. Since h∈Hch\in H_{c}, the series ∑k=1∞hk2/ck\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}h_{k}^{2}/c_{k} converges by The Cameron-Martin Space of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §space, with sum ∣h∣c2|h|_{c}^{2} by The Cameron-Martin Space of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §square. So (ηk)(\eta_{k}) satisfies the hypotheses of Kolmogorov's Maximal Inequality and the Convergence of Series of Independent Square-Integrable Random Variables; let T0=0T_{0}=0, Tn=∑k=1nηkT_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\eta_{k}, the set CC and the random variable TT be as there. By Kolmogorov's Maximal Inequality and the Convergence of Series of Independent Square-Integrable Random Variables §almost-sure, C∈FC\in\mathcal{F} and P(C)=1P(C)=1; by Kolmogorov's Maximal Inequality and the Convergence of Series of Independent Square-Integrable Random Variables §mean-square, TT is square-integrable and, for every nn that is zero or a natural number,

E[(T−Tn)2]=∑k=n+1∞hk2ck,E[T]=0,E[T2]=∑k=1∞hk2ck=∣h∣c2,\mathbb{E}\bigl[(T-T_{n})^{2}\bigr]=\sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty}\frac{h_{k}^{2}}{c_{k}},\qquad\mathbb{E}[T]=0,\qquad\mathbb{E}[T^{2}]=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{h_{k}^{2}}{c_{k}}=|h|_{c}^{2},

and E[(T−Tn)2]→0\mathbb{E}[(T-T_{n})^{2}]\to0 as n→∞n\to\infty. Each TnT_{n} is a square-integrable random variable, as a finite sum of such, by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product.

Step 7 (the functional along YY). Keep h∈Hch\in H_{c}. For ω∈G\omega\in G and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, the coordinates of Y(ω)Y(\omega) are ck ξk(ω)\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega) by Step 5, so

ℓh,n(Y(ω))=∑k=1nhkck ξk(ω)ck=∑k=1nhkck ξk(ω)=Tn(ω).\ell_{h,n}(Y(\omega))=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{h_{k}\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)}{c_{k}}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{h_{k}}{\sqrt{c_{k}}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)=T_{n}(\omega).

Let E=G∩C∈FE=G\cap C\in\mathcal{F}. The events Ω∖G\Omega\setminus G and Ω∖C\Omega\setminus C have probability 1−1=01-1=0 by claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure, so by countable subadditivity (claim 4 there, applied to the sequence Ω∖G,Ω∖C,∅,∅,…\Omega\setminus G,\Omega\setminus C,\emptyset,\emptyset,\dots) the event Ω∖E=(Ω∖G)∪(Ω∖C)\Omega\setminus E=(\Omega\setminus G)\cup(\Omega\setminus C) has probability 00, and P(E)=1P(E)=1 by claim 3 there. For ω∈E\omega\in E the sequence (ℓh,n(Y(ω)))n=(Tn(ω))n(\ell_{h,n}(Y(\omega)))_{n}=(T_{n}(\omega))_{n} converges, since ω∈C\omega\in C, to T(ω)T(\omega); hence Y(ω)∈DhY(\omega)\in D_{h} and ℓh(Y(ω))=T(ω)\ell_{h}(Y(\omega))=T(\omega) by The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Vector Relative to a Variance Sequence §functional. Thus

ℓh,n∘Y=Tn on G (n∈N),ℓh∘Y=T on E,E⊆Y−1(Dh),\ell_{h,n}\circ Y=T_{n}\ \text{on }G\ (n\in\mathbb{N}),\qquad\ell_{h}\circ Y=T\ \text{on }E,\qquad E\subseteq Y^{-1}(D_{h}),

where Ω∖G\Omega\setminus G and Ω∖E\Omega\setminus E are events of probability 00; in particular each of these equalities holds PP-almost everywhere, the exceptional set being contained in an event of probability 00 and hence PP-null, as A Property Holding Almost Everywhere requires.

Step 8 (almost everywhere convergence). Keep h∈Hch\in H_{c}. By Step 2, Dh∈B(X)D_{h}\in\mathcal{B}(X), so Y−1(Dh)∈FY^{-1}(D_{h})\in\mathcal{F} and γc(Dh)=P(Y−1(Dh))\gamma_{c}(D_{h})=P(Y^{-1}(D_{h})) by Step 5. Since E⊆Y−1(Dh)⊆ΩE\subseteq Y^{-1}(D_{h})\subseteq\Omega, monotonicity (claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure) gives 1=P(E)≤P(Y−1(Dh))≤P(Ω)=11=P(E)\le P(Y^{-1}(D_{h}))\le P(\Omega)=1. Hence γc(Dh)=1\gamma_{c}(D_{h})=1, which is the first assertion of claim 3.

Step 9 (integrability). Keep h∈Hch\in H_{c} and let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. The random variables ℓh∘Y\ell_{h}\circ Y and ℓh,n∘Y\ell_{h,n}\circ Y (Step 5, using Steps 1 and 3) agree with the square-integrable random variables TT and TnT_{n} off the events Ω∖E\Omega\setminus E and Ω∖G\Omega\setminus G of probability 00 (Step 7). By Almost Sure Equality Preserves Square-Integrability and the Mean-Square Norm, ℓh∘Y\ell_{h}\circ Y and ℓh,n∘Y\ell_{h,n}\circ Y are square-integrable, with

E[(ℓh∘Y)2]=E[T2].\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\ell_{h}\circ Y)^{2}\bigr]=\mathbb{E}[T^{2}].

Let gg be ℓh\ell_{h} or ℓh,n\ell_{h,n}. Then g∘Yg\circ Y is integrable with respect to PP, since square-integrable random variables are integrable by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product; and (g∘Y)2=g2∘Y(g\circ Y)^{2}=g^{2}\circ Y is a nonnegative random variable with finite integral, hence integrable by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral. The functions gg and g2g^{2} are Borel by Steps 1 and 3 and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, so by Step 5 both gg and g2g^{2} are integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and

∫Xg dγc=∫Ωg∘Y dP,∫Xg2 dγc=∫Ω(g∘Y)2 dP.\int_{X}g\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}g\circ Y\,dP,\qquad\int_{X}g^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}(g\circ Y)^{2}\,dP.

This is the second assertion of claim 3.

Step 10 (mean-square convergence). Keep h∈Hch\in H_{c} and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, and let v=(ℓh−ℓh,n)2v=(\ell_{h}-\ell_{h,n})^{2}, a nonnegative Borel function by Steps 1 and 3 and claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By Step 7, v∘Y=(T−Tn)2v\circ Y=(T-T_{n})^{2} on EE, so PP-almost everywhere; both are nonnegative random variables (Step 5 and Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product). By Step 5 (nonnegative case), the almost-everywhere comparison The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison for nonnegative functions, and Step 6,

∫Xv dγc=∫Ωv∘Y dP=∫Ω(T−Tn)2 dP=E[(T−Tn)2]=∑k=n+1∞hk2ck,\int_{X}v\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}v\circ Y\,dP=\int_{\Omega}(T-T_{n})^{2}\,dP=\mathbb{E}\bigl[(T-T_{n})^{2}\bigr]=\sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty}\frac{h_{k}^{2}}{c_{k}},

the integrals of nonnegative functions being those of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral and the expectation that of Expectation, Variance, and Moments. This value is a real number, so vv is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral, and its integral in the sense of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral is the same number, since v+=vv^{+}=v and v−=0v^{-}=0, whose integral is 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral with the null set ∅\emptyset. By Step 6 this value tends to 00 as n→∞n\to\infty. This is the third assertion of claim 3, and with Steps 8 and 9 it completes claim 3.

Step 11 (mean and variance; claim 4). Keep h∈Hch\in H_{c}. By Step 9 with g=ℓhg=\ell_{h}, then by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison applied to the integrable random variable TT (integrable as a square-integrable random variable, by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product) and to ℓh∘Y\ell_{h}\circ Y, which equals TT almost everywhere by Step 7, and finally by Step 6,

∫Xℓh dγc=∫Ωℓh∘Y dP=∫ΩT dP=E[T]=0.\int_{X}\ell_{h}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}\ell_{h}\circ Y\,dP=\int_{\Omega}T\,dP=\mathbb{E}[T]=0.

By Step 9 with g=ℓhg=\ell_{h} and the identity displayed there, and by Step 6,

∫X(ℓh)2 dγc=∫Ω(ℓh∘Y)2 dP=E[(ℓh∘Y)2]=E[T2]=∣h∣c2,\int_{X}(\ell_{h})^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\Omega}(\ell_{h}\circ Y)^{2}\,dP=\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\ell_{h}\circ Y)^{2}\bigr]=\mathbb{E}[T^{2}]=|h|_{c}^{2},

where the integral of the nonnegative integrable function (ℓh∘Y)2(\ell_{h}\circ Y)^{2} is its expectation by Expectation, Variance, and Moments (the two readings of the expectation agree, since the negative part is 00, with integral 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral). This proves claim 4.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…