TheoremBase

Proof of The Heat Gauge Form on Probability Measures: Algebra, Representation by Smoothed Densities, Positivity, Cauchy-Schwarz, Separation, the Triangle Inequality, the Wasserstein Bound and Derivative Bounds for the Potential

lemmalem:heat-gauge-form-wasserstein-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 18,737 chars · 38 deps · depth 23 Reason: First publication of the proof of the heat gauge form lemma (Goal 3F, batch F0).

The algebra is read off the definition of B; the representation follows from the series form of the kernel pairing; positivity, Cauchy-Schwarz and the triangle inequality follow from it by the quadratic-form argument; separation uses the duality of Gaussian smoothing, its uniform approximation of Lipschitz functions and the determination of a measure by Lipschitz functions; the Wasserstein bound is a mixed second difference of K integrated against a coupling; the potential bounds come from writing g2smug_{2s}*mu as gsg_s smoothed against the density gsmug_s*mu and applying Cauchy-Schwarz scale by scale.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, for αP(Rq)\alpha\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) and kNk\in\mathbb{N} we write αk=gskα\alpha_{k}=g_{s_{k}}*\alpha, a nonnegative Borel integrable function with αkdλq=1\int\alpha_{k}\,d\lambda_{q}=1 whose square is integrable (Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §duality and Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §pairing with ν=μ\nu=\mu, as sk12s_{k}\le\tfrac12), and Dk=μkνkD_{k}=\mu_{k}-\nu_{k}, Dk=μkνkD'_{k}=\mu'_{k}-\nu'_{k}. By The Multiscale Gaussian Kernel: Definition by a Series, Regularity and Bounds, the Smoothed Potential of a Probability Measure and the Kernel Pairing of Two Measures §pairing, for all α,βP(Rq)\alpha,\beta\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{q}),

K(α,β)=K(β,α)=RqKβdα=k=1wkRqαkβkdλq,()\mathcal{K}(\alpha,\beta)=\mathcal{K}(\beta,\alpha)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}K*\beta\,d\alpha=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}w_{k}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\alpha_{k}\beta_{k}\,d\lambda_{q},\tag{$*$}

a convergent series with nonnegative terms, each product αkβk\alpha_{k}\beta_{k} being integrable. Series of real numbers are added and multiplied by constants termwise by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, and integrals of integrable functions are linear by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Elementary identities in the field R\mathbb{R} are those of Field; 2aba2+b22ab\le a^{2}+b^{2} for real a,ba,b follows from 0(ab)2=a22ab+b20\le(a-b)^{2}=a^{2}-2ab+b^{2} (claim 5 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); \sqrt{\cdot} is nondecreasing on [0,)[0,\infty) and ab=ab\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab} (claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities), and c2=c\sqrt{c^{2}}=|c| for real cc (claim 1 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field and Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root).

Claim 1. Writing out the definition of BB and using the symmetry of K\mathcal{K} in ()(*): B(μ,ν;μ,ν)=K(μ,μ)K(μ,ν)K(ν,μ)+K(ν,ν)=B(μ,ν;μ,ν)B(\mu',\nu';\mu,\nu)=\mathcal{K}(\mu',\mu)-\mathcal{K}(\mu',\nu)-\mathcal{K}(\nu',\mu)+\mathcal{K}(\nu',\nu)=B(\mu,\nu;\mu',\nu'); B(ν,μ;μ,ν)=K(ν,μ)K(ν,ν)K(μ,μ)+K(μ,ν)=B(μ,ν;μ,ν)B(\nu,\mu;\mu',\nu')=\mathcal{K}(\nu,\mu')-\mathcal{K}(\nu,\nu')-\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu')+\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu')=-B(\mu,\nu;\mu',\nu'); and B(μ,ν;μ,ν)+B(ν,σ;μ,ν)=K(μ,μ)K(μ,ν)K(σ,μ)+K(σ,ν)=B(μ,σ;μ,ν)B(\mu,\nu;\mu',\nu')+B(\nu,\sigma;\mu',\nu')=\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu')-\mathcal{K}(\mu,\nu')-\mathcal{K}(\sigma,\mu')+\mathcal{K}(\sigma,\nu')=B(\mu,\sigma;\mu',\nu'), the terms in ν\nu cancelling. Consequently Q(ν,μ)=B(ν,μ;ν,μ)=B(μ,ν;ν,μ)=B(ν,μ;μ,ν)=B(μ,ν;μ,ν)=Q(μ,ν)Q(\nu,\mu)=B(\nu,\mu;\nu,\mu)=-B(\mu,\nu;\nu,\mu)=-B(\nu,\mu;\mu,\nu)=B(\mu,\nu;\mu,\nu)=Q(\mu,\nu), using the second identity, then the first, then the second again; Q(μ,μ)=K(μ,μ)K(μ,μ)K(μ,μ)+K(μ,μ)=0Q(\mu,\mu)=\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu)-\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu)-\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu)+\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu)=0; and, using additivity in the first pair, the symmetry of pairs, and additivity again,

Q(μ,σ)=B(μ,ν;μ,σ)+B(ν,σ;μ,σ)=B(μ,σ;μ,ν)+B(μ,σ;ν,σ)=(Q(μ,ν)+B(ν,σ;μ,ν))+(B(μ,ν;ν,σ)+Q(ν,σ)),Q(\mu,\sigma)=B(\mu,\nu;\mu,\sigma)+B(\nu,\sigma;\mu,\sigma)=B(\mu,\sigma;\mu,\nu)+B(\mu,\sigma;\nu,\sigma)=\bigl(Q(\mu,\nu)+B(\nu,\sigma;\mu,\nu)\bigr)+\bigl(B(\mu,\nu;\nu,\sigma)+Q(\nu,\sigma)\bigr),

and B(ν,σ;μ,ν)=B(μ,ν;ν,σ)B(\nu,\sigma;\mu,\nu)=B(\mu,\nu;\nu,\sigma) by the symmetry of pairs, which gives the displayed polarisation identity.

Claim 2. By ()(*) applied to the four pairings in BB and termwise linearity of series,

B(μ,ν;μ,ν)=k=1wkRq(μkμkμkνkνkμk+νkνk)dλq=k=1wkRqDkDkdλq,B(\mu,\nu;\mu',\nu')=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}w_{k}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\bigl(\mu_{k}\mu'_{k}-\mu_{k}\nu'_{k}-\nu_{k}\mu'_{k}+\nu_{k}\nu'_{k}\bigr)\,d\lambda_{q}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}w_{k}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}D_{k}D'_{k}\,d\lambda_{q},

by linearity of the integral and the pointwise identity (ab)(cd)=acadbc+bd(a-b)(c-d)=ac-ad-bc+bd in R\mathbb{R}; each DkDkD_{k}D'_{k} is integrable as a linear combination of the four integrable products (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral). The kkth term is bounded in absolute value by the kkth term of the convergent series kwk(μkμk+μkνk+νkμk+νkνk)dλq\sum_{k}w_{k}\int(\mu_{k}\mu'_{k}+\mu_{k}\nu'_{k}+\nu_{k}\mu'_{k}+\nu_{k}\nu'_{k})\,d\lambda_{q} (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, the triangle inequality of claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and termwise linearity), so the series converges absolutely by An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges §dominated. With (μ,ν)=(μ,ν)(\mu',\nu')=(\mu,\nu) this gives Q(μ,ν)=kwkDk2dλqQ(\mu,\nu)=\sum_{k}w_{k}\int D_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}, whose terms are nonnegative (claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, and monotonicity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral against the zero function), so Q(μ,ν)0Q(\mu,\nu)\ge0 by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion.

Claim 3. Put a=Q(μ,ν)a=Q(\mu,\nu), b=Q(μ,ν)b=Q(\mu',\nu'), c=B(μ,ν;μ,ν)c=B(\mu,\nu;\mu',\nu'), and let tRt\in\mathbb{R}. For each kk, (tDkDk)2dλq=t2Dk22tDkDk+Dk20\int(tD_{k}-D'_{k})^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}=t^{2}\int D_{k}^{2}-2t\int D_{k}D'_{k}+\int D'^{2}_{k}\ge0 (expansion of the square, linearity, claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral); multiplying by wkw_{k}, summing (claim 2 and termwise linearity) and using Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion gives t2a2tc+b0t^{2}a-2tc+b\ge0 for every real tt. If a=0a=0, then b2tcb\ge2tc for every tt, which forces c=0c=0 (if c0c\ne0, taking t=(b+1)/(2c)t=(b+1)/(2c) gives bb+1b\ge b+1, a contradiction), so c=0ab|c|=0\le\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}. If a>0a>0, taking t=c/at=c/a gives c2/a2c2/a+b0c^{2}/a-2c^{2}/a+b\ge0, that is c2/a+b0-c^{2}/a+b\ge0, and multiplying by a>0a>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives c2abc^{2}\le ab, whence c=c2ab=ab|c|=\sqrt{c^{2}}\le\sqrt{ab}=\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}.

Claim 4. If μ=ν\mu=\nu then Q(μ,ν)=0Q(\mu,\nu)=0 by claim 1. Conversely let Q(μ,ν)=0Q(\mu,\nu)=0. Each term wkDk2w_{k}\int D_{k}^{2} of the nonnegative series in claim 2 is at most a partial sum of it (claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums), which is at most the sum 00 (Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates); so Dk2dλq=0\int D_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}=0 (wk>0w_{k}>0), hence Dk2=0D_{k}^{2}=0, that is μk=νk\mu_{k}=\nu_{k}, λq\lambda_{q}-almost everywhere by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing. Let ϕ:RqR\phi:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} be Lipschitz, with a constant L>0L>0 (a Lipschitz constant may be increased), with values in [0,1][0,1]; ϕ\phi is Borel and bounded by 11 (A Probability Measure on Euclidean Space Is Determined by the Integrals of Lipschitz Functions with Values in the Unit Interval, preamble). By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison, ϕμkdλq=ϕνkdλq\int\phi\,\mu_{k}\,d\lambda_{q}=\int\phi\,\nu_{k}\,d\lambda_{q}, so by Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §duality

Rqgskϕdμ=Rqgskϕdνfor every kN.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}g_{s_{k}}*\phi\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}g_{s_{k}}*\phi\,d\nu\qquad\text{for every }k\in\mathbb{N}.

Let ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and put r=ϵ/Lr=\epsilon/L; then ϕ(x)ϕ(x)Lxxϵ|\phi(x)-\phi(x')|\le L\lVert x-x'\rVert\le\epsilon whenever xxr\lVert x-x'\rVert\le r, so by Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §approximation with M=1M=1, (gskϕ)(x)ϕ(x)ϵ+2qskL2/ϵ2|(g_{s_{k}}*\phi)(x)-\phi(x)|\le\epsilon+2qs_{k}L^{2}/\epsilon^{2} for all xx and kk. Choose NNN\in\mathbb{N} with Nϵ3>2qL2N\epsilon^{3}>2qL^{2} (claim 2 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers); since N4NN\le4^{N} (the set of kk with k4kk\le4^{k} contains 11 and is closed under kk+1k\mapsto k+1, as k+14k+34k=4k+1k+1\le4^{k}+3\cdot4^{k}=4^{k+1}, so it is N\mathbb{N} by Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers), sN=4N1/Ns_{N}=4^{-N}\le1/N and 2qsNL2/ϵ22qL2/(Nϵ2)<ϵ2qs_{N}L^{2}/\epsilon^{2}\le2qL^{2}/(N\epsilon^{2})<\epsilon. Hence (gsNϕ)(x)ϕ(x)2ϵ|(g_{s_{N}}*\phi)(x)-\phi(x)|\le2\epsilon for all xx, and by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space,

ϕdμϕdν(ϕgsNϕ)dμ+(gsNϕϕ)dν4ϵ,\Bigl|\int\phi\,d\mu-\int\phi\,d\nu\Bigr|\le\Bigl|\int(\phi-g_{s_{N}}*\phi)\,d\mu\Bigr|+\Bigl|\int(g_{s_{N}}*\phi-\phi)\,d\nu\Bigr|\le4\epsilon,

using the displayed equality for k=Nk=N and the triangle inequality. As ϵ>0\epsilon>0 was arbitrary, ϕdμ=ϕdν\int\phi\,d\mu=\int\phi\,d\nu by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack. This holds for every Lipschitz ϕ\phi with values in [0,1][0,1], so μ=ν\mu=\nu by A Probability Measure on Euclidean Space Is Determined by the Integrals of Lipschitz Functions with Values in the Unit Interval.

Claim 5. By claim 1, claim 3 and ccc\le|c| (claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field),

Q(μ,σ)=Q(μ,ν)+2B(μ,ν;ν,σ)+Q(ν,σ)Q(μ,ν)+2Q(μ,ν)Q(ν,σ)+Q(ν,σ)=(Q(μ,ν)+Q(ν,σ))2,Q(\mu,\sigma)=Q(\mu,\nu)+2B(\mu,\nu;\nu,\sigma)+Q(\nu,\sigma)\le Q(\mu,\nu)+2\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)}\sqrt{Q(\nu,\sigma)}+Q(\nu,\sigma)=\bigl(\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)}+\sqrt{Q(\nu,\sigma)}\bigr)^{2},

and taking nonnegative square roots, which is order preserving, gives the triangle inequality.

Claim 6. Let CQ=qM2C_{Q}=q\,M_{2}, with M2M_{2} the bound on the second partial derivatives of KK in The Multiscale Gaussian Kernel: Definition by a Series, Regularity and Bounds, the Smoothed Potential of a Probability Measure and the Kernel Pairing of Two Measures §kernel (here M2M_{2} is that constant, not a second moment). Let μ,νP2(Rq)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) and πΠ(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu), so that (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu and (pr2)#π=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\nu (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling). For z,zRq+qz,z'\in\mathbb{R}^{q+q} write x=pr1(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z), y=pr2(z)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z), x=pr1(z)x'=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'), y=pr2(z)y'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z'), and

Δ(z,z)=K(xx)K(xy)K(yx)+K(yy).\Delta(z,z')=K(x-x')-K(x-y')-K(y-x')+K(y-y').

By ()(*) and The Multiscale Gaussian Kernel: Definition by a Series, Regularity and Bounds, the Smoothed Potential of a Probability Measure and the Kernel Pairing of Two Measures §potential, K(μ,μ)=(K(xx)μ(dx))μ(dx)\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu)=\int\bigl(\int K(x-x')\,\mu(dx')\bigr)\mu(dx), and by the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, applied to the inner integral with the bounded Borel function xK(xx)x'\mapsto K(x-x') and then to the outer one, this equals (K(pr1(z)pr1(z))π(dz))π(dz)\int\bigl(\int K(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'))\,\pi(dz')\bigr)\pi(dz); the inner integral is a bounded Borel function of zz by The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §continuous applied to the probability measure (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu, read at the point pr1(z)\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z). The same holds for the other three pairings with pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} in place of pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} in the appropriate slots, so, by linearity of the integral,

Q(μ,ν)=Rq+q(Rq+qΔ(z,z)π(dz))π(dz).Q(\mu,\nu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q+q}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q+q}}\Delta(z,z')\,\pi(dz')\Bigr)\pi(dz).

We bound Δ\Delta. Fix z,zz,z' and let h:RqRh:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R}, h(w)=K(wx)K(wy)h(w)=K(w-x')-K(w-y'), of class C1C^{1} with ih(w)=iK(wx)iK(wy)\partial_{i}h(w)=\partial_{i}K(w-x')-\partial_{i}K(w-y') (claims 1 and 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set together with Partial Derivatives, Continuity and CkC^k Regularity under a Scaling Substitution, claim 2, for the substitution wwxw\mapsto w-x'). Since iK\partial_{i}K is of class C1C^{1} with partial derivatives bounded by M2M_{2}, part (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder (on W=RqW=\mathbb{R}^{q}, every segment lying in it) gives ih(w)qM2xy|\partial_{i}h(w)|\le\sqrt{q}\,M_{2}\,\lVert x'-y'\rVert for all ww; applying part (i) again to hh, whose partial derivatives are bounded by qM2xy\sqrt{q}M_{2}\lVert x'-y'\rVert, gives

Δ(z,z)=h(x)h(y)qqM2xyxyqM22(xy2+xy2),|\Delta(z,z')|=|h(x)-h(y)|\le\sqrt{q}\cdot\sqrt{q}\,M_{2}\,\lVert x'-y'\rVert\,\lVert x-y\rVert\le\frac{q\,M_{2}}{2}\bigl(\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}+\lVert x'-y'\rVert^{2}\bigr),

by 2aba2+b22ab\le a^{2}+b^{2}. Integrating in zz' against π\pi (monotonicity, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral; the right side is integrable since xy2π(dz)=I(π)<\int\lVert x'-y'\rVert^{2}\pi(dz')=I(\pi)<\infty by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost and Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §cost-finite), then in zz, gives Q(μ,ν)qM22(I(π)+I(π))=CQI(π)Q(\mu,\nu)\le\frac{qM_{2}}{2}\bigl(I(\pi)+I(\pi)\bigr)=C_{Q}\,I(\pi), using |\int\cdot|\le\int|\cdot| and Q0Q\ge0. Finally, by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance, W2(μ,ν)2W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} is the infimum of {I(π):πΠ(μ,ν)}\{I(\pi):\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu)\}; if CQ=0C_{Q}=0 then Q(μ,ν)=0Q(\mu,\nu)=0 and there is nothing to prove, and otherwise Q(μ,ν)/CQQ(\mu,\nu)/C_{Q} is a lower bound of that set, hence at most its infimum, so Q(μ,ν)CQW2(μ,ν)2Q(\mu,\nu)\le C_{Q}W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} and Q(μ,ν)CQW2(μ,ν)\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)}\le\sqrt{C_{Q}}\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu).

Claim 7. KμK*\mu and KνK*\nu are of class C3C^{3} (The Multiscale Gaussian Kernel: Definition by a Series, Regularity and Bounds, the Smoothed Potential of a Probability Measure and the Kernel Pairing of Two Measures §potential), so ψ=KμKν\psi=K*\mu-K*\nu is of class C3C^{3} by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, with partial derivatives the differences of those of KμK*\mu and KνK*\nu (claim 1 there), and it is continuous and bounded by 2M02M_{0}, hence Borel and bounded. Fix kk and let ρk\rho_{k} be the measure with density μk\mu_{k} with respect to λq\lambda_{q}, a probability measure on B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) since μkdλq=1\int\mu_{k}\,d\lambda_{q}=1 (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables), and similarly ρk\rho'_{k} with density νk\nu_{k}. For xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q}, by The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §convolution with s=sks=s_{k}, Tonelli (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems, the integrand (u,y)gsk(ux)gsk(uy)(u,y)\mapsto g_{s_{k}}(u-x)g_{s_{k}}(u-y) being nonnegative and measurable for the product σ\sigma-algebra as in Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity), the density identity of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and the evenness of gskg_{s_{k}},

(g2skμ)(x)=(gsk(ux)gsk(uy)du)μ(dy)=gsk(xu)μk(u)du=(gskρk)(x).(g_{2s_{k}}*\mu)(x)=\int\Bigl(\int g_{s_{k}}(u-x)\,g_{s_{k}}(u-y)\,du\Bigr)\mu(dy)=\int g_{s_{k}}(x-u)\,\mu_{k}(u)\,du=(g_{s_{k}}*\rho_{k})(x).

Thus g2skμ=gskρkg_{2s_{k}}*\mu=g_{s_{k}}*\rho_{k} and likewise g2skν=gskρkg_{2s_{k}}*\nu=g_{s_{k}}*\rho'_{k}. By Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §regularity applied to ρk\rho_{k} and ρk\rho'_{k}, and the density identity again, for β\partial^{\beta} any of the identity, i\partial_{i}, ji\partial_{j}\partial_{i}, lji\partial_{l}\partial_{j}\partial_{i},

β(g2skμg2skν)(x)=Rqβgsk(xu)Dk(u)du.\partial^{\beta}\bigl(g_{2s_{k}}*\mu-g_{2s_{k}}*\nu\bigr)(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\partial^{\beta}g_{s_{k}}(x-u)\,D_{k}(u)\,du .

By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, the case p=2p=2 of Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder, applied to the square-integrable functions uβgsk(xu)u\mapsto\partial^{\beta}g_{s_{k}}(x-u) and DkD_{k} (the former by The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §bounds together with the reflection and translation invariance of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n for the substitution uxuu\mapsto x-u, the latter by claim 2 above), and fgfg|\int fg|\le\int|fg| (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral), βgsk(xu)Dk(u)du2(βgsk)2dλqDk2dλqBβsk(q+2β)/2Dk2dλq\bigl|\int\partial^{\beta}g_{s_{k}}(x-u)D_{k}(u)\,du\bigr|^{2}\le\int(\partial^{\beta}g_{s_{k}})^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}\int D_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}\le B_{|\beta|}\,s_{k}^{-(q+2|\beta|)/2}\int D_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}, where β{0,1,2,3}|\beta|\in\{0,1,2,3\} is the order and B0,,B3B_{0},\dots,B_{3} are the constants of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §bounds; here sk(q+2β)/2=2k(q+2β)s_{k}^{-(q+2|\beta|)/2}=2^{k(q+2|\beta|)}, since sk=2k\sqrt{s_{k}}=2^{-k} by (2k)2=4k(2^{-k})^{2}=4^{-k} (exponent rules of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field) and the uniqueness of the nonnegative square root, so that the inverse of (sk)q+2β=2k(q+2β)(\sqrt{s_{k}})^{q+2|\beta|}=2^{-k(q+2|\beta|)} is 2k(q+2β)2^{k(q+2|\beta|)}. Now, by The Multiscale Gaussian Kernel: Definition by a Series, Regularity and Bounds, the Smoothed Potential of a Probability Measure and the Kernel Pairing of Two Measures §kernel and The Multiscale Gaussian Kernel: Definition by a Series, Regularity and Bounds, the Smoothed Potential of a Probability Measure and the Kernel Pairing of Two Measures §potential, β(Kμ)(x)=βK(xy)μ(dy)=kwkβg2sk(xy)μ(dy)=kwkβg2sk(xy)μ(dy)\partial^{\beta}(K*\mu)(x)=\int\partial^{\beta}K(x-y)\,\mu(dy)=\int\sum_{k}w_{k}\partial^{\beta}g_{2s_{k}}(x-y)\,\mu(dy)=\sum_{k}w_{k}\int\partial^{\beta}g_{2s_{k}}(x-y)\,\mu(dy), the interchange being justified by Dominated Convergence Theorem applied to the partial sums, which are dominated by a constant: by The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §bounds with s=2sks=2s_{k}, and (2sk)(q+β)/2=(2)(q+β)2k(q+β)2k(q+β)(2s_{k})^{-(q+|\beta|)/2}=(\sqrt{2})^{-(q+|\beta|)}2^{k(q+|\beta|)}\le2^{k(q+|\beta|)}, one has wkβg2sk(xy)Aβ2k(8β)|w_{k}\partial^{\beta}g_{2s_{k}}(x-y)|\le A_{|\beta|}2^{-k(8-|\beta|)}, so every partial sum is bounded in absolute value by Aβk(2(8β))kA_{|\beta|}\sum_{k}(2^{-(8-|\beta|)})^{k}, a finite constant by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §geometric (claims 2 and 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers and Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion), integrable with respect to μ\mu; and βg2sk(xy)μ(dy)=β(g2skμ)(x)\int\partial^{\beta}g_{2s_{k}}(x-y)\mu(dy)=\partial^{\beta}(g_{2s_{k}}*\mu)(x) by Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §regularity. Subtracting the same for ν\nu (termwise linearity),

βψ(x)=k=1wkβ(g2skμg2skν)(x),\partial^{\beta}\psi(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}w_{k}\,\partial^{\beta}\bigl(g_{2s_{k}}*\mu-g_{2s_{k}}*\nu\bigr)(x),

and, for each kk, the kkth term is bounded in absolute value by ukvku_{k}v_{k}, where uk=wkBβ(2)k(q+2β)u_{k}=\sqrt{w_{k}}\sqrt{B_{|\beta|}}\,(\sqrt{2})^{k(q+2|\beta|)} and vk=wkDk2dλqv_{k}=\sqrt{w_{k}}\sqrt{\int D_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}} (here sk(q+2β)/2=2k(q+2β)=(2)k(q+2β)\sqrt{s_{k}^{-(q+2|\beta|)/2}}=\sqrt{2^{k(q+2|\beta|)}}=(\sqrt{2})^{k(q+2|\beta|)} and ab=ab\sqrt{ab}=\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}). For real t>0t>0 and real numbers u,vu,v one has 2uvtu2+v2/t2uv\le tu^{2}+v^{2}/t (from 0(tuv)2=t2u22tuv+v20\le(tu-v)^{2}=t^{2}u^{2}-2tuv+v^{2}, divided by tt). Applying this termwise and summing over kmk\le m (claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers) gives, for every mNm\in\mathbb{N} and every t>0t>0,

2k=1mukvktk=1mwkBβ2k(q+2β)+1tk=1mwkDk2dλqtNβ2+Q(μ,ν)t,2\sum_{k=1}^{m}u_{k}v_{k}\le t\sum_{k=1}^{m}w_{k}B_{|\beta|}2^{k(q+2|\beta|)}+\frac1t\sum_{k=1}^{m}w_{k}\int D_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}\le t\,N_{|\beta|}^{2}+\frac{Q(\mu,\nu)}{t},

where Nβ2=Bβkwk2k(q+2β)=Bβk(2(82β))kN_{|\beta|}^{2}=B_{|\beta|}\sum_{k}w_{k}2^{k(q+2|\beta|)}=B_{|\beta|}\sum_{k}(2^{-(8-2|\beta|)})^{k} is finite by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §geometric, since wk2k(q+2β)=2k(82β)w_{k}2^{k(q+2|\beta|)}=2^{-k(8-2|\beta|)} and 82β28-2|\beta|\ge2, and the two partial sums are bounded by the corresponding sums by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion (claim 2 above for the second). Hence the partial sums of the nonnegative series kukvk\sum_{k}u_{k}v_{k} are bounded (take t=1t=1), so it converges by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion, and βψ(x)kukvk|\partial^{\beta}\psi(x)|\le\sum_{k}u_{k}v_{k} by An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges §dominated; passing to the limit mm\to\infty in the display (Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences) gives 2kukvktNβ2+Q(μ,ν)/t2\sum_{k}u_{k}v_{k}\le tN_{|\beta|}^{2}+Q(\mu,\nu)/t for every t>0t>0. If Q(μ,ν)=0Q(\mu,\nu)=0 this gives 2kukvktNβ22\sum_{k}u_{k}v_{k}\le tN_{|\beta|}^{2} for every t>0t>0, so kukvk=0NβQ(μ,ν)\sum_{k}u_{k}v_{k}=0\le N_{|\beta|}\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)} by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack. If Q(μ,ν)>0Q(\mu,\nu)>0 and Nβ>0N_{|\beta|}>0, taking t=Q(μ,ν)/Nβt=\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)}/N_{|\beta|} gives kukvkNβQ(μ,ν)\sum_{k}u_{k}v_{k}\le N_{|\beta|}\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)}; if Nβ=0N_{|\beta|}=0 then every uk=0u_{k}=0 and the sum is 00. In all cases βψ(x)NβQ(μ,ν)|\partial^{\beta}\psi(x)|\le N_{|\beta|}\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)}, with N0,,N3N_{0},\dots,N_{3} depending only on qq. Lastly, by ()(*), K(μ,μ)=K(μ,μ)=Kμdμ\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu')=\mathcal{K}(\mu',\mu)=\int K*\mu\,d\mu' and similarly for the other three pairings, so by linearity of the integral

B(μ,ν;μ,ν)=KμdμKνdμKμdν+Kνdν=ψdμψdν.B(\mu,\nu;\mu',\nu')=\int K*\mu\,d\mu'-\int K*\nu\,d\mu'-\int K*\mu\,d\nu'+\int K*\nu\,d\nu'=\int\psi\,d\mu'-\int\psi\,d\nu' .

Claim 8. The function (μ,ν)Q(μ,ν)(\mu,\nu)\mapsto\sqrt{Q(\mu,\nu)} takes nonnegative real values (claim 2); it is symmetric by claim 1; it vanishes at (μ,ν)(\mu,\nu) exactly when Q(μ,ν)=0Q(\mu,\nu)=0 (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root), that is, by claim 4, exactly when μ=ν\mu=\nu; and it satisfies the triangle inequality by claim 5. These are the defining properties of a metric on P(Rq)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{q}).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…