TheoremBase

Proof of Stokes Theorem for Compact Oriented Smooth Manifolds with Boundary

theoremthm:stokes-smooth-manifold-boundary-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial published proof of the Stokes theorem for compact oriented smooth manifolds with boundary; verifies the parity convention of the induced boundary orientation; approved by Aaron after referencing pass.

Proof

Fix the chosen oriented smooth atlas ((Uα,φα))αA((U_\alpha,\varphi_\alpha))_{\alpha\in A} of MM and write Ωα=φα(Uα)\Omega_\alpha=\varphi_\alpha(U_\alpha).

Step 1 (reduction to a single chart). By Smooth Partitions of Unity on a Compact Smooth Manifold with Boundary choose NN, indices α1,,αN\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_N, and a smooth partition of unity χ1,,χN\chi_1,\dots,\chi_N subordinate to the chart domains. For each chart β\beta and each coordinate direction ll, the one-dimensional product rule applied to coordinate slices of local smooth extensions gives, for the coefficient functions in the coordinate expansion,

(χi,βa)xl=χi,βaxl+aχi,βxl,\frac{\partial(\chi_{i,\beta}\,a)}{\partial x_l}=\chi_{i,\beta}\frac{\partial a}{\partial x_l}+a\frac{\partial\chi_{i,\beta}}{\partial x_l},

so from Exterior Derivative of a Smooth Differential Form on a Smooth Manifold with Boundary and Exterior Derivative of a C^1 Differential Form on a Euclidean Open Set, summing over ii and using iχi,β=1\sum_i\chi_{i,\beta}=1 and iχi,β/xl=0\sum_i\partial\chi_{i,\beta}/\partial x_l=0 (finite sums), we get i=1Nd(χiω)=dω\sum_{i=1}^{N}d(\chi_i\omega)=d\omega chart by chart. Likewise ι\iota^{*} is additive in the form directly from the formula in Restriction of a Smooth Differential Form to the Boundary, so iι(χiω)=ιω\sum_i\iota^{*}(\chi_i\omega)=\iota^{*}\omega. Since M\int_M and M\int_{\partial M} are additive over finite sums of smooth forms (additivity of the iterated integral in the integrand, as in the proofs of Independence of the Manifold Integral from Chart and Partition Choices), it suffices to prove

Mdη=Mιη\int_M d\eta=\int_{\partial M}\iota^{*}\eta

for η=χiω\eta=\chi_i\omega, a smooth (n1)(n-1)-form whose support (in the sense used in Smooth Partitions of Unity on a Compact Smooth Manifold with Boundary) is compact and contained in a single chart domain UγU_\gamma, with φ=φγ\varphi=\varphi_\gamma, Ω=Ωγ\Omega=\Omega_\gamma, and K=φ(suppη)ΩK=\varphi(\operatorname{supp}\eta)\subseteq\Omega compact (as in claim 1 of Independence of the Manifold Integral from Chart and Partition Choices).

Step 2 (single-chart evaluation of integrals over MM). If a smooth nn-form σ\sigma on MM has compact support inside one chart domain UγU_\gamma, then Mσ=Ωσγ\int_M\sigma=\int_\Omega\sigma_\gamma: computing Mσ\int_M\sigma by Integral of a Smooth n-Form over a Compact Oriented Smooth Manifold with Boundary with any partition of unity χk\chi'_k, each term Ωβk(χkσ)βk\int_{\Omega_{\beta_k}}(\chi'_k\sigma)_{\beta_k} equals Ω(χkσ)γ\int_{\Omega}(\chi'_k\sigma)_{\gamma} by exactly the transport argument of claim 3 of Independence of the Manifold Integral from Chart and Partition Choices (restriction to the overlap image, compatibility, and Pullback Invariance of the Integral under Orientation-Preserving Smooth Diffeomorphisms); summing over kk and using kχk=1\sum_k\chi'_k=1 with additivity gives the claim. We apply this to σ=dη\sigma=d\eta (its support is contained in that of η\eta: where η\eta vanishes on an open set, so do the exterior derivatives of its local extensions).

Write the representative in the chart as

ηγ=j=1najdx1dxj^dxn,\eta_\gamma=\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_j\,dx_1\wedge\cdots\wedge\widehat{dx_j}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_n,

with the hat denoting omission; the coefficients aj:ΩRa_j:\Omega\to\mathbb{R} agree locally with smooth functions on open sets. By Active Coordinate Coefficient Formula for the Exterior Derivative applied to local extensions (with the full index set 1,,n1,\dots,n), the coefficient of (dη)γ(d\eta)_\gamma is

c=j=1n(1)j1ajxj.c=\sum_{j=1}^{n}(-1)^{j-1}\frac{\partial a_j}{\partial x_j}.

Choose R>0R>0 so large that KK is contained in the interior of the box B=[R,R]n1×[0,R]B=[-R,R]^{n-1}\times[0,R] relative to the ambient set (claim 2 of Zero Extension Continuity and Box Independence of the Iterated Integral, enlarging RR by 11; if Ω\Omega is treated as open in Rn\mathbb{R}^n and KK has points with negative last coordinate, the boundary case below is vacuous and the argument is the same with B=[R,R]nB=[-R,R]^n). By Integral of a Compactly Supported Continuous n-Form on a Euclidean or Half-Space Domain and additivity, Mdη=j(1)j1Ij\int_M d\eta=\sum_j(-1)^{j-1}I_j, where IjI_j is the iterated integral over BB of the zero extension of aj/xj\partial a_j/\partial x_j. By the reordering sub-lemma (a) in the proof of Pullback Invariance of the Integral under Orientation-Preserving Smooth Diffeomorphisms, we may integrate the jjth variable first. Fix the other variables and consider g(t)=a~j(,t,)g(t)=\tilde a_j(\dots,t,\dots), the zero extension of aja_j along the jjth coordinate slice. Every point of the slice lies either in Ω\Omega, where gg agrees locally with a smooth extension of aja_j and is differentiable with derivative aj/xj\partial a_j/\partial x_j (Derivative of a Coordinate Slice of a C^1 Function on a Euclidean Open Set), or outside KK, where gg vanishes on a neighborhood and has derivative 00; so gg is an antiderivative of the zero-extended integrand on the whole interval. By Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II in One Dimension: for j<nj<n, the inner integral equals g(R)g(R)=00=0g(R)-g(-R)=0-0=0 since KK avoids the faces xj=±Rx_j=\pm R; hence Ij=0I_j=0. For j=nj=n, the inner integral equals g(R)g(0)=a~n(t,0)g(R)-g(0)=-\tilde a_n(t',0), where t=(t1,,tn1)t'=(t_1,\dots,t_{n-1}) and a~n(t,0)\tilde a_n(t',0) is the zero extension of ana_n at (t,0)(t',0). Therefore

Mdη=(1)n1([R,R]n1a~n(t,0)dt)=(1)nI,I=[R,R]n1a~n(t,0)dt,\int_M d\eta=(-1)^{n-1}\cdot\Bigl(-\int_{[-R,R]^{n-1}}\tilde a_n(t',0)\,dt'\Bigr)=(-1)^{n}\,I,\qquad I=\int_{[-R,R]^{n-1}}\tilde a_n(t',0)\,dt',

with the (n1)(n-1)-fold iterated integral on the right.

Step 3 (the boundary side). If UγM=U_\gamma\cap\partial M=\varnothing, then ΩHn=\Omega\cap\partial H^n=\varnothing by claim 3 of Boundary of a Smooth Manifold with Boundary as a Smooth Manifold of Dimension n-1 (or M=\partial M=\varnothing altogether), so a~n(t,0)=0\tilde a_n(t',0)=0 for all tt' and I=0I=0; also ιη\iota^{*}\eta is the zero form on M\partial M (its defining formula in Restriction of a Smooth Differential Form to the Boundary evaluates η\eta's representatives at boundary points, where they vanish since the corresponding manifold points lie outside the support of η\eta), so both sides vanish and the identity holds — including the convention when M=\partial M=\varnothing.

Otherwise, consider the map ϑ\vartheta on UγMU_\gamma\cap\partial M given by ϑ=Tcπφ\vartheta=T_c\circ\pi\circ\varphi when nn is even and ϑ=ρTcπφ\vartheta=\rho\circ T_c\circ\pi\circ\varphi when nn is odd, where π\pi, TcT_c, ρ\rho are as in Boundary of a Smooth Manifold with Boundary as a Smooth Manifold of Dimension n-1 and Induced Orientation on the Boundary of an Oriented Smooth Manifold with Boundary, and cc is chosen so that the image of the compact set π(KHn)\pi(K\cap\partial H^n) lands in the region with positive last coordinate. The transports between ϑ\vartheta-coordinates and the charts of the induced orientation atlas are smooth diffeomorphisms of admissible domains with positive Jacobian determinant: this is the computation of claims 2–3 of Transition Maps of Induced Boundary Charts of an Oriented Atlas are Orientation-Preserving, which applies verbatim to ϑ\vartheta (built from the oriented-atlas chart φ\varphi by the same recipe as the induced boundary charts, with the same parity convention for ρ\rho). Hence, computing Mιη\int_{\partial M}\iota^{*}\eta by Integral of a Smooth n-Form over a Compact Oriented Smooth Manifold with Boundary with a partition of unity on M\partial M and transporting every term into ϑ\vartheta-coordinates via Pullback Invariance of the Integral under Orientation-Preserving Smooth Diffeomorphisms (as in Step 2), we obtain

Mιη=P(ιη)ϑ,\int_{\partial M}\iota^{*}\eta=\int_{P}(\iota^{*}\eta)_\vartheta,

where PP is the ϑ\vartheta-image, an open subset of Rn1\mathbb{R}^{n-1}.

It remains to compute (ιη)ϑ(\iota^{*}\eta)_\vartheta from the pullback formula of Restriction of a Smooth Differential Form to the Boundary, with the affine map jj satisfying j(y)=φ(ϑ1(y))j(y)=\varphi(\vartheta^{-1}(y)). The Jacobian matrix JjJ_j maps Rn1\mathbb{R}^{n-1} into the boundary hyperplane (its last row is zero), so for every basis (n1)(n-1)-form of ηγ\eta_\gamma containing a factor dxndx_n — that is, every term aja_j with j<nj<n — the evaluation on Jjv1,,Jjvn1J_jv_1,\dots,J_jv_{n-1} contains a zero row in the corresponding determinant and vanishes. Only the ana_n term survives. When nn is even, j(y)=(Tc1(y),0)j(y)=(T_c^{-1}(y),0) and the surviving pullback is an(Tc1(y),0)dy1dyn1a_n(T_c^{-1}(y),0)\,dy_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dy_{n-1}; the translation TcT_c is an orientation-preserving smooth diffeomorphism, so by Pullback Invariance of the Integral under Orientation-Preserving Smooth Diffeomorphisms (or directly, since translating a box translates the iterated integrals),

P(ιη)ϑ=[R,R]n1a~n(t,0)dt=I=(1)nI=Mdη,\int_P(\iota^{*}\eta)_\vartheta=\int_{[-R,R]^{n-1}}\tilde a_n(t',0)\,dt'=I=(-1)^n I=\int_M d\eta,

using (1)n=1(-1)^n=1. When nn is odd, j(y)=(Tc1(ρ(y)),0)j(y)=(T_c^{-1}(\rho(y)),0), and the linear part of jj composes the insertion with ρ\rho, whose determinant on the first n1n-1 coordinates is 1-1; the surviving pullback is an(Tc1(ρ(y)),0)dy1dyn1-\,a_n(T_c^{-1}(\rho(y)),0)\,dy_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dy_{n-1}. Substituting y1y1y_1\mapsto-y_1 in the first integration (the one-dimensional substitution of sub-lemma (c) in the proof of Pullback Invariance of the Integral under Orientation-Preserving Smooth Diffeomorphisms, applied to the affine map ttt\mapsto-t with the limits exchanged) shows

P(ιη)ϑ=[R,R]n1a~n(t,0)dt=I=(1)nI=Mdη,\int_P(\iota^{*}\eta)_\vartheta=-\int_{[-R,R]^{n-1}}\tilde a_n(t',0)\,dt'=-I=(-1)^n I=\int_M d\eta,

using (1)n=1(-1)^n=-1. In both parities Mιη=Mdη\int_{\partial M}\iota^{*}\eta=\int_M d\eta, completing Step 3 and, with Step 1, the proof. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…