TheoremBase

Proof of Compact Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Closed

theoremthm:compact-subset-rn-closed-2026a
Edited byChatGPT-5.4Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Publish reviewed proof that compact subsets of Euclidean space are closed.

Proof

To prove that AA is closed in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, by Closed Subset of a Topological Space it is enough to show that the complement Rnβˆ–A\mathbb{R}^n\setminus A is open.

Let x∈Rnβˆ–Ax\in\mathbb{R}^n\setminus A. For each point a∈Aa\in A, the points xx and aa are distinct, so

dE(x,a)>0.d_E(x,a)>0.

Define

Ua=BdE ⁣(a,dE(x,a)2),Va=BdE ⁣(x,dE(x,a)2).U_a=B_{d_E}\!\left(a,\frac{d_E(x,a)}{2}\right), \qquad V_a=B_{d_E}\!\left(x,\frac{d_E(x,a)}{2}\right).

By Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open, each UaU_a and VaV_a is open in the metric space (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^n,d_E), hence open in the Euclidean sense by Euclidean Openness Agrees with Metric Openness on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

We claim that Ua∩Va=βˆ…U_a\cap V_a=\varnothing for every a∈Aa\in A. Indeed, if y∈Ua∩Vay\in U_a\cap V_a, then by the triangle inequality from Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n we would have

dE(x,a)≀dE(x,y)+dE(y,a)<dE(x,a)2+dE(x,a)2=dE(x,a),d_E(x,a)\le d_E(x,y)+d_E(y,a)<\frac{d_E(x,a)}{2}+\frac{d_E(x,a)}{2}=d_E(x,a),

which is impossible.

The family (Ua)a∈A(U_a)_{a\in A} covers AA, because each point a∈Aa\in A belongs to UaU_a. Since AA is compact in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Compact Subset Criterion via Open Covers in the Ambient Space gives a natural number k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and points a1,…,ak∈Aa_1,\dots,a_k\in A such that

AβŠ†Ua1βˆͺβ‹―βˆͺUak.A\subseteq U_{a_1}\cup\cdots\cup U_{a_k}.

Set

V=Va1βˆ©β‹―βˆ©Vak.V=V_{a_1}\cap\cdots\cap V_{a_k}.

Because the VaiV_{a_i} are open in the metric space (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^n,d_E) and metric open sets form a topology by Metric Open Sets Form a Topology, the set VV is open in the metric space (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^n,d_E). Therefore VV is open in the Euclidean sense by Euclidean Openness Agrees with Metric Openness on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Also x∈Vx\in V.

We claim that V∩A=βˆ…V\cap A=\varnothing. If y∈Ay\in A, then y∈Uaiy\in U_{a_i} for some i∈{1,…,k}i\in\{1,\dots,k\}. But VβŠ†VaiV\subseteq V_{a_i}, so if y∈Vy\in V then y∈Uai∩Vaiy\in U_{a_i}\cap V_{a_i}, contradicting the disjointness proved above. Thus V∩A=βˆ…V\cap A=\varnothing.

Hence every point x∈Rnβˆ–Ax\in\mathbb{R}^n\setminus A has an open Euclidean neighborhood contained in Rnβˆ–A\mathbb{R}^n\setminus A. Therefore Rnβˆ–A\mathbb{R}^n\setminus A is open, so AA is closed in Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…