TheoremBase

Conditional Jensen follows by applying monotonicity to the countably many rational supporting lines of the convex function, with explicit exceptional events; the moment bound is proved by testing against bounded known factors built from the version and Hölder's inequality; monotone convergence identifies the almost-sure limit through the expectations; dominated convergence in mean follows from the first-moment contraction.

Proof

Throughout, the field and order laws of R\mathbb{R} are used freely (The Structure of ℝ as a Field and an Ordered Ring (i), The Structure of ℝ as a Field and an Ordered Ring (ii), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (ii), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (v), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (vi), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x)). The elements of E[X∣G]\mathbb{E}[X\mid\mathcal{G}] are the G/B(R)\mathcal{G}/\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable elements of L1(P)\mathcal{L}^{1}(P) with the same integrals as XX over all sets of G\mathcal{G} (Conditional Expectation (ii), Conditional Expectations: Notation (ii)), and for f∈L1(P)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(P) and A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}, ∫Af dP=E[f1A]\int_{A}f\,dP=\mathbb{E}[f\mathbf{1}_{A}] (Integrals over Measurable Subsets (vi), Integrals over Measurable Subsets (ii)). For G/B(R)\mathcal{G}/\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable S,TS,T and c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}, the functions S±TS\pm T, cScS, STST and ∣S∣|S| are G/B(R)\mathcal{G}/\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable and the sets {S>T}\{S>T\}, {S≥c}\{S\ge c\} and {∣S∣≤c}\{|S|\le c\} lie in G\mathcal{G} (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (i), Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (v), on (Ω,G)(\Omega,\mathcal{G})). For nonnegative elements of L1(P)\mathcal{L}^{1}(P), the integrals as elements of M+\mathcal{M}^{+} and of L1(P)\mathcal{L}^{1}(P) agree (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vi)).

Rational points of II. Let QI=I∩QQ_{I}=I\cap\mathbb{Q}, the rationals read in R\mathbb{R} (The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness (v)); it is countable (Countable Sets: a Bijection from ℕ onto ℕ×ℕ, Finite Sets, Subsets, Surjective Images, Images, Products, and the Integers and Rationals (ix), Countable Sets: a Bijection from ℕ onto ℕ×ℕ, Finite Sets, Subsets, Surjective Images, Images, Products, and the Integers and Rationals (iv)).

Rational points on both sides. For every x∈Ix\in I there are q,q′∈QIq,q'\in Q_{I} with q<x<q′q<x<q'. Indeed, as II is open there is a real ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that every tt with ∣t−x∣<ε|t-x|<\varepsilon lies in II (Open Subset of a Metric Space (i), Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (iv)), and by density of the rationals (The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness (x)) there are rationals q∈(x−ε,x)q\in(x-\varepsilon,x) and q′∈(x,x+ε)q'\in(x,x+\varepsilon). Since P(Ω)=1P(\Omega)=1, Ω\Omega has a point ω0\omega_{0}, and X(ω0)∈IX(\omega_{0})\in I; hence QI≠∅Q_{I}\neq\emptyset. So for every family (Aq)q∈QI(A_{q})_{q\in Q_{I}} of sets in G\mathcal{G}, the union and the intersection lie in G\mathcal{G} (Unions and Intersections over a Countable Index Set in a σ-Algebra (i), Unions and Intersections over a Countable Index Set in a σ-Algebra (ii)); and if P(Aq)=0P(A_{q})=0 for every qq, then, taking a surjection g:N→QIg:\mathbb{N}\to Q_{I} (Countable Set (i)), ⋃qAq=⋃m∈NAg(m)\bigcup_{q}A_{q}=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{g(m)} has probability 00 (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (iv)).

Proof of (i). Let

G−=⋂q∈QI{Y<q},G+=⋂q∈QI{Y>q},G_{-}=\bigcap_{q\in Q_{I}}\{Y<q\},\qquad G_{+}=\bigcap_{q\in Q_{I}}\{Y>q\},

both in G\mathcal{G}. If ω∉G−∪G+\omega\notin G_{-}\cup G_{+}, there are q,q′∈QIq,q'\in Q_{I} with q≤Y(ω)≤q′q\le Y(\omega)\le q', so Y(ω)∈IY(\omega)\in I (Intervals of the Real Line (i)); thus {Y∉I}⊆G−∪G+\{Y\notin I\}\subseteq G_{-}\cup G_{+}. For ω∈G−\omega\in G_{-} choose q∈QIq\in Q_{I} with q<X(ω)q<X(\omega); then Y(ω)<q<X(ω)Y(\omega)<q<X(\omega). Hence (X−Y)1G−≥0(X-Y)\mathbf{1}_{G_{-}}\ge0, with {(X−Y)1G−>0}=G−\{(X-Y)\mathbf{1}_{G_{-}}>0\}=G_{-}, and

E[(X−Y)1G−]=∫G−X dP−∫G−Y dP=0\mathbb{E}\bigl[(X-Y)\mathbf{1}_{G_{-}}\bigr]=\int_{G_{-}}X\,dP-\int_{G_{-}}Y\,dP=0

(Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (iii)), so P(G−)=0P(G_{-})=0 (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iv)). In the same way, with (Y−X)1G+(Y-X)\mathbf{1}_{G_{+}}, P(G+)=0P(G_{+})=0. The set {Y∈I}=Y−1(I)\{Y\in I\}=Y^{-1}(I) is an event, as II is open and so Borel (Borel Sets of a Metric Space: Open and Closed Sets, Points, Open Sets of Subspaces, and Subspaces (i), Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Metric Space (ii)). Therefore P(Y∉I)≤P(G−)+P(G+)=0P(Y\notin I)\le P(G_{-})+P(G_{+})=0 (Basic Properties of a Measure (iii), Basic Properties of a Measure (vii)) and P(Y∈I)=1P(Y\in I)=1 (Basic Properties of a Measure (v)).

Proof of (ii). Step 1: the rational supporting lines. For q∈QIq\in Q_{I} let cqc_{q} be the real number of Convex Functions on an Open Interval: Monotone Slopes, Supporting Lines, Continuity, and the Supremum of Rational Supporting Lines (ii) at qq, and dq=φ(q)−cqqd_{q}=\varphi(q)-c_{q}q. By Convex Functions on an Open Interval: Monotone Slopes, Supporting Lines, Continuity, and the Supremum of Rational Supporting Lines (iii),

φ(X(ω))≥φ(q)+cq(X(ω)−q)=cqX(ω)+dq(ω∈Ω).\varphi\bigl(X(\omega)\bigr)\ge\varphi(q)+c_{q}\bigl(X(\omega)-q\bigr)=c_{q}X(\omega)+d_{q}\qquad(\omega\in\Omega).

The constant dqd_{q} belongs to E[dq∣G]\mathbb{E}[d_{q}\mid\mathcal{G}] (Rules for Conditional Expectations (i)), so cqY+dq∈E[cqX+dq∣G]c_{q}Y+d_{q}\in\mathbb{E}[c_{q}X+d_{q}\mid\mathcal{G}] (Rules for Conditional Expectations (iii)), and monotonicity (Rules for Conditional Expectations (iv)) gives cqY+dq≤Zc_{q}Y+d_{q}\le Z a.s. Thus the set Bq={cqY+dq>Z}∈GB_{q}=\{c_{q}Y+d_{q}>Z\}\in\mathcal{G} is null, so P(Bq)=0P(B_{q})=0 (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (i)), and B=⋃q∈QIBqB=\bigcup_{q\in Q_{I}}B_{q} is an event with P(B)=0P(B)=0.

Step 2: conclusion. Let ω∉B\omega\notin B with Y(ω)∈IY(\omega)\in I. Then Z(ω)≥φ(q)+cq(Y(ω)−q)Z(\omega)\ge\varphi(q)+c_{q}\bigl(Y(\omega)-q\bigr) for every q∈QIq\in Q_{I}, so Z(ω)Z(\omega) is an upper bound of the set whose supremum is φ(Y(ω))\varphi(Y(\omega)) by Convex Functions on an Open Interval: Monotone Slopes, Supporting Lines, Continuity, and the Supremum of Rational Supporting Lines (v); hence φ(Y(ω))≤Z(ω)\varphi(Y(\omega))\le Z(\omega). Every ω\omega outside the event BB of probability 00 thus has Y(ω)∉IY(\omega)\notin I or φ(Y(ω))≤Z(ω)\varphi(Y(\omega))\le Z(\omega), which is the assertion (A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i), Null Set of a Measure (i)).

Proof of (iii). XX is integrable (Lᵖ Inclusions and Constants on a Finite Measure Space (i)), and YY is measurable. Let G={Y≥0}∈GG=\{Y\ge0\}\in\mathcal{G}.

The case p=1p=1. Here ∣f∣1=∣f∣|f|^{1}=|f| (Properties of Real Powers (i)). Since Ω∖G∈G\Omega\setminus G\in\mathcal{G}, ∣Y∣=Y1G−Y1Ω∖G|Y|=Y\mathbf{1}_{G}-Y\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G} and X1G−X1Ω∖G≤∣X∣X\mathbf{1}_{G}-X\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}\le|X|,

E∣Y∣=∫GY dP−∫Ω∖GY dP=∫GX dP−∫Ω∖GX dP=E[X1G−X1Ω∖G]≤E∣X∣\mathbb{E}|Y|=\int_{G}Y\,dP-\int_{\Omega\setminus G}Y\,dP=\int_{G}X\,dP-\int_{\Omega\setminus G}X\,dP=\mathbb{E}\bigl[X\mathbf{1}_{G}-X\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}\bigr]\le\mathbb{E}|X|

(Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (iii), Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (iv), Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (v)); in particular Y∈L1(P)Y\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(P).

The case p>1p>1. Let r=p/(p−1)r=p/(p-1), so that r>1r>1, 1/p+1/r=11/p+1/r=1 and (p−1)r=p(p-1)r=p. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let An={∣Y∣≤n}∈GA_{n}=\{|Y|\le n\}\in\mathcal{G} and

Wn=∣Y∣p−1(1An∩G−1An∖G),W_{n}=|Y|^{p-1}\bigl(\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}\cap G}-\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}\setminus G}\bigr),

which is G/B(R)\mathcal{G}/\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable (Real Powers of the Absolute Value of a Measurable Function Are Measurable (i) on (Ω,G)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}), Properties of Simple Functions and of the Simple Integral (i)). By the exponent laws for real powers (Properties of Real Powers (i), Properties of Real Powers (iv), Real Powers (ii)), using Y=∣Y∣Y=|Y| on GG and Y=−∣Y∣Y=-|Y| off GG,

∣Wn∣=∣Y∣p−11An≤np−1,WnY=∣Y∣p1An,∣Wn∣r=∣Y∣p1An,|W_{n}|=|Y|^{p-1}\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}}\le n^{p-1},\qquad W_{n}Y=|Y|^{p}\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}},\qquad |W_{n}|^{r}=|Y|^{p}\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}},

the bound by Properties of Real Powers (vi). Let an=E[∣Y∣p1An]≥0a_{n}=\mathbb{E}\bigl[|Y|^{p}\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}}\bigr]\ge0. As WnW_{n} is bounded, Rules for Conditional Expectations (viii) and Rules for Conditional Expectations (ii) give

an=E[WnY]=E[WnX].a_{n}=\mathbb{E}[W_{n}Y]=\mathbb{E}[W_{n}X].

The display shows Wn∈Lr(P)W_{n}\in\mathcal{L}^{r}(P) with ∥Wn∥r=an1/r\|W_{n}\|_{r}=a_{n}^{1/r} (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii), Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii)), so Hölder's inequality (Hölder's Inequality (i)) and Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (v) give

an≤E∣WnX∣≤∥X∥p an1/r.a_{n}\le\mathbb{E}|W_{n}X|\le\|X\|_{p}\,a_{n}^{1/r}.

If an>0a_{n}>0, then an=an1/pan1/ra_{n}=a_{n}^{1/p}a_{n}^{1/r} with an1/r>0a_{n}^{1/r}>0 (Properties of Real Powers (iv), Properties of Real Powers (ii)), so an1/p≤∥X∥pa_{n}^{1/p}\le\|X\|_{p} and, raising to the power pp, an≤∥X∥pp=E∣X∣pa_{n}\le\|X\|_{p}^{p}=\mathbb{E}|X|^{p} (Properties of Real Powers (vi), Properties of Real Powers (vii)); if an=0a_{n}=0 this is clear. Finally An⊆An+1A_{n}\subseteq A_{n+1}, and every ω\omega lies in AnA_{n} for n>∣Y(ω)∣n>|Y(\omega)| (The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness (ix)), so the functions ∣Y∣p1An|Y|^{p}\mathbf{1}_{A_{n}} increase pointwise to ∣Y∣p|Y|^{p}, and monotone convergence (Monotone Convergence Theorem (ii)) gives

E∣Y∣p=sup⁡nan≤E∣X∣p<∞,\mathbb{E}|Y|^{p}=\sup_{n}a_{n}\le\mathbb{E}|X|^{p}<\infty,

so Y∈Lp(P)Y\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(P) (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii)).

Proof of (iv). Step 1: ordering the versions. Let ω\omega be such that Xj(ω)→X(ω)X_{j}(\omega)\to X(\omega), and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. As Xk(ω)≤Xj(ω)X_{k}(\omega)\le X_{j}(\omega) for every j≥kj\ge k, Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (x) gives Xk(ω)≤X(ω)X_{k}(\omega)\le X(\omega). Hence Xk≤XX_{k}\le X a.s. (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vi)), and Xk≤Xk+1X_{k}\le X_{k+1} everywhere, so by monotonicity (Rules for Conditional Expectations (iv)) Yk≤Yk+1Y_{k}\le Y_{k+1} a.s. and Yk≤YY_{k}\le Y a.s. The sets Ck={Yk>Yk+1}∪{Yk>Y}∈GC_{k}=\{Y_{k}>Y_{k+1}\}\cup\{Y_{k}>Y\}\in\mathcal{G} are therefore null, so P(Ck)=0P(C_{k})=0 (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (iii), Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (i)), and the event A=Ω∖⋃k∈NCkA=\Omega\setminus\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}C_{k} has P(Ω∖A)=0P(\Omega\setminus A)=0 (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (iv)).

Step 2: the expectations. Since 0≤Xk≤X0\le X_{k}\le X a.s. and Xk→XX_{k}\to X a.s., EXk→EX\mathbb{E}X_{k}\to\mathbb{E}X (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (ix), with dominating function XX). Let hk=(Y−Yk)1Ah_{k}=(Y-Y_{k})\mathbf{1}_{A}, a measurable function with hk≥0h_{k}\ge0, equal to Y−YkY-Y_{k} a.s. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii), Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (iii) and Rules for Conditional Expectations (ii),

Ehk=EY−EYk=EX−EXk→0\mathbb{E}h_{k}=\mathbb{E}Y-\mathbb{E}Y_{k}=\mathbb{E}X-\mathbb{E}X_{k}\to0

(Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (i), Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi)).

Step 3: the limit. Let h(ω)=inf⁡khk(ω)h(\omega)=\inf_{k}h_{k}(\omega), a measurable function into [0,∞][0,\infty] (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (vii), Suprema, Infima, Limits Inferior and Limits Superior of Measurable [0,∞]-Valued Maps (ii)) with h≤hkh\le h_{k} for every kk. Hence ∫h dP≤Ehk\int h\,dP\le\mathbb{E}h_{k} for every kk (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (iii)), so ∫h dP\int h\,dP is a real number ≤0\le0 (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (x)), that is, ∫h dP=0\int h\,dP=0, and P(h>0)=0P(h>0)=0 (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iv)). Let ω∈A\omega\in A with h(ω)=0h(\omega)=0. The sequence (hk(ω))k=(Y(ω)−Yk(ω))k(h_{k}(\omega))_{k}=(Y(\omega)-Y_{k}(\omega))_{k} is nonincreasing and bounded below by 00, so it converges to its infimum h(ω)=0h(\omega)=0 (Completeness of the Real Numbers for Sequences: Monotone Convergence, the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem and Cauchy Sequences (iii)), and Yk(ω)→Y(ω)Y_{k}(\omega)\to Y(\omega) (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi)). So Yk(ω)→Y(ω)Y_{k}(\omega)\to Y(\omega) for every ω\omega outside the event (Ω∖A)∪{h>0}(\Omega\setminus A)\cup\{h>0\}, which has probability 00 (Basic Properties of a Measure (vii)).

Proof of (v). By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (vii), XX and every XkX_{k} are integrable.

Proof of (vi). By (v) the conditional expectations of XX and the XkX_{k} are defined, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (viii), E∣Xk−X∣→0\mathbb{E}|X_{k}-X|\to0. By Rules for Conditional Expectations (iii), Yk−Y∈E[Xk−X∣G]Y_{k}-Y\in\mathbb{E}[X_{k}-X\mid\mathcal{G}], so (iii) with p=1p=1 gives

0≤E∣Yk−Y∣≤E∣Xk−X∣(k∈N),0\le\mathbb{E}|Y_{k}-Y|\le\mathbb{E}|X_{k}-X|\qquad(k\in\mathbb{N}),

and E∣Yk−Y∣→0\mathbb{E}|Y_{k}-Y|\to0 by squeezing (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (i), Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (xi)).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…