TheoremBase

Proof of The Square-Integrable and Sobolev Spaces of the Torus Form a Hilbert Triple

lemmalem:sobolev-hilbert-triple-torus-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 7,573 chars · 17 deps · depth 30 Reason: First publication. Verifies the Hilbert triple conditions from the Sobolev theorem, and identifies the form operator on twice continuously differentiable periodic functions by testing the weak derivative of an arbitrary Sobolev class against the classical derivative.

The triple conditions are read off from the Sobolev theorem; the form operator is identified on twice continuously differentiable periodic functions by testing the weak derivative against the classical one.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named below.

Proof of claim 1. The measure space (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) is the one fixed in The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure. By The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §hilbert, applied to that measure space, L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with the inner product ,L2\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{L^{2}} of The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product is a real Hilbert space; by that clause its norm and distance are those fixed in The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §lebesgue.

By The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §space, H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is a linear subspace of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), and by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §inner-product the map ,H1\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{H^{1}} is an inner product on it, with distance dH1d_{H^{1}}. By The Sobolev Space on the Torus is a Separable Hilbert Space Densely Embedded in the Square-Integrable Space §complete, H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with that inner product is a real Hilbert space.

We check the two conditions of Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §triple for H=L2(Tn)H=L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and V=H1(Tn)V=H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). Condition Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §embedding requires that the L2L^{2} norm of a member of H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) be at most its H1H^{1} norm; this is the first inequality of The Sobolev Space on the Torus is a Separable Hilbert Space Densely Embedded in the Square-Integrable Space §embedding. Condition Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §dense requires that H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) be dense in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}); this is The Sobolev Space on the Torus is a Separable Hilbert Space Densely Embedded in the Square-Integrable Space §dense.

Hence Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §triple applies to these data, and Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §operator furnishes the set D(A)H1(Tn)D(A)\subseteq H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and the map A:D(A)L2(Tn)A:D(A)\to L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with X,YH1=AX,YL2\langle X,Y\rangle_{H^{1}}=\langle AX,Y\rangle_{L^{2}} for all XD(A)X\in D(A) and YH1(Tn)Y\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), so that L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with ,H1\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle_{H^{1}}, and AA form a Hilbert triple.

Finally (H1(Tn),dH1)(H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}),d_{H^{1}}) is separable by The Sobolev Space on the Torus is a Separable Hilbert Space Densely Embedded in the Square-Integrable Space §separable. Since V=H1(Tn)V=H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and dV=dH1d_{V}=d_{H^{1}} for this triple, that is precisely the standing hypothesis Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §separable.

Proof of claim 2. Let uCper2u\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}. The memberships uCper1u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, uCperu\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, iiuCper\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u\in C_{\mathrm{per}} for i[n]i\in[n], ΔuCper\Delta u\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, uΔuCperu-\Delta u\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, (uΔu)QL2(Tn)(u-\Delta u)|_{Q}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and [uQ]H1(Tn)[u|_{Q}]\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) are justified in the statement by the references attached there; for Δu\Delta u we note in addition that Δu\Delta u is by The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian the map whose value at xx is the finite sum i=1niiu(x)\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u(x), and that a finite sum of members of CperC_{\mathrm{per}} lies in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by induction on the upper summation index from Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §algebra, the base case being a single member of CperC_{\mathrm{per}}.

Write U=[uQ]U=[u|_{Q}]. Since uCper1u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, Elementary Properties of the Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus §classical gives jU=[(ju)Q]\partial_{j}U=[(\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}] for every j[n]j\in[n], this class lying in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by that clause.

Let VH1(Tn)V\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), let vv be a representative of VV and, for j[n]j\in[n], let hjh_{j} be a representative of jV\partial_{j}V. By The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §inner-product,

U,VH1=U,VL2+j=1n[(ju)Q],jVL2.\langle U,V\rangle_{H^{1}}=\langle U,V\rangle_{L^{2}}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl\langle[(\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}],\partial_{j}V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}} .

Fix j[n]j\in[n]. Since uCper2u\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}, we have juCper1\partial_{j}u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative. Applying Elementary Properties of the Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus §test-c1 to the class VV, its jj-th weak partial derivative jV\partial_{j}V, the representatives vv and hjh_{j}, and the test function φ=juCper1\varphi=\partial_{j}u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}},

Tnv((jju)Q)dx=Tnhj((ju)Q)dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}v\,\bigl((\partial_{j}\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}h_{j}\,\bigl((\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx .

By The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product the right-hand integral is [(ju)Q],jVL2\bigl\langle[(\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}],\partial_{j}V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}, the pointwise product being commutative, so

[(ju)Q],jVL2=Tnv((jju)Q)dx.\bigl\langle[(\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}],\partial_{j}V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}v\,\bigl((\partial_{j}\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx .

For each j[n]j\in[n] put fj=v((jju)Q)f_{j}=v\cdot\bigl((\partial_{j}\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}\bigr). Since jjuCper\partial_{j}\partial_{j}u\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, its restriction to QQ lies in L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus §member, and vL2(Tn)v\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}); so fjf_{j} is integrable by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product. Applying Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §integrable and Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §linear with m=nm=n, these maps fjf_{j} and the coefficients cj=1c_{j}=-1,

j=1n(Tnfjdx)=Tn(j=1n(1)fj)dx,\sum_{j=1}^{n}\Bigl(-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}f_{j}\,dx\Bigr)=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{n}(-1)\,f_{j}\Bigr)dx ,

the map xj=1n(1)fj(x)x\mapsto\sum_{j=1}^{n}(-1)f_{j}(x) being integrable. By claims 1 and 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set, applied to the map jjju(x)j\mapsto\partial_{j}\partial_{j}u(x) on [n][n] with the scalar v(x)-v(x), we have for every xQx\in Q

j=1n(1)fj(x)=(v(x))j=1njju(x)=v(x)Δu(x),\sum_{j=1}^{n}(-1)f_{j}(x)=\bigl(-v(x)\bigr)\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_{j}\partial_{j}u(x)=-v(x)\,\Delta u(x),

the last equality by The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian. Since the finite sums of two families with the same terms coincide, combining the last three displays gives

j=1n[(ju)Q],jVL2=Tnv((Δu)Q)dx=[(Δu)Q],VL2,\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl\langle[(\partial_{j}u)|_{Q}],\partial_{j}V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}v\,\bigl((\Delta u)|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=-\bigl\langle[(\Delta u)|_{Q}],V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}} ,

the last equality again by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product, the class [(Δu)Q][(\Delta u)|_{Q}] lying in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus §member.

Therefore

U,VH1=U,VL2[(Δu)Q],VL2.\langle U,V\rangle_{H^{1}}=\langle U,V\rangle_{L^{2}}-\bigl\langle[(\Delta u)|_{Q}],V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}} .

By The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product the right-hand side is Tn(uQ)vdxTn((Δu)Q)vdx\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\bigl(u|_{Q}\bigr)v\,dx-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\bigl((\Delta u)|_{Q}\bigr)v\,dx, which by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, applied with the coefficients 11 and 1-1, equals

Tn(uQ(Δu)Q)vdx=Tn((uΔu)Q)vdx=[(uΔu)Q],VL2,\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\bigl(u|_{Q}-(\Delta u)|_{Q}\bigr)v\,dx=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\bigl((u-\Delta u)|_{Q}\bigr)v\,dx=\bigl\langle[(u-\Delta u)|_{Q}],V\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}} ,

since (uΔu)Q(u-\Delta u)|_{Q} and uQ(Δu)Qu|_{Q}-(\Delta u)|_{Q} are the same map on QQ, the difference being pointwise. This is the identity asserted in the claim.

Since VH1(Tn)V\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) was arbitrary, the class Z=[(uΔu)Q]L2(Tn)Z=[(u-\Delta u)|_{Q}]\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) satisfies U,YH1=Z,YL2\langle U,Y\rangle_{H^{1}}=\langle Z,Y\rangle_{L^{2}} for every YH1(Tn)Y\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). By Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §operator this says exactly that UD(A)U\in D(A) and AU=ZAU=Z, that is, [uQ]D(A)[u|_{Q}]\in D(A) and A[uQ]=[(uΔu)Q]A[u|_{Q}]=[(u-\Delta u)|_{Q}].

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…