TheoremBase

Combines the approximating test data for vλv^{\lambda} with the single-test-function transfer lemma to produce, for each small parameter, a test function touching vv near z0z_0; the value identity then follows from the definition of the sup-convolution together with upper semicontinuity, and the transfer from the resulting uniform estimates.

Proof

Throughout, the notation is that of the statement; RM\mathbb{R}^{M} is open, so it is an admissible domain for Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data and for Transfer of a Test Function from the Sup-Convolution to the Original Function. Put

L=vλ(η0)+12 λ−1∥q0∥2,Θ=2+λ−1+12 λ−1(2∥q0∥+1).L=v^{\lambda}(\eta_{0})+\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\lVert q_{0}\rVert^{2},\qquad \Theta=2+\lambda^{-1}+\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\bigl(2\lVert q_{0}\rVert+1\bigr).

Since 0<λ−10<\lambda^{-1} and 0≤∥q0∥0\le\lVert q_{0}\rVert by claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, every summand after the leading 22 in Θ\Theta is nonnegative, so 1≤Θ1\le\Theta; in particular 0<Θ0<\Theta, and Θ−1\Theta^{-1} exists and is positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Step 1 (the basic construction). Let ε′∈R\varepsilon'\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<ε′≤10<\varepsilon'\le1. Then there are y∈RMy\in\mathbb{R}^{M} and a function ψ:RM→R\psi:\mathbb{R}^{M}\to\mathbb{R} of class C2C^{2} on RM\mathbb{R}^{M} such that v−ψv-\psi has a local maximum at yy relative to RM\mathbb{R}^{M} and

dE(y,z0)≤Θε′,∣v(y)−L∣≤Θε′,∥Dψ(y)−q0∥≤Θε′,dS(M)(D2ψ(y),Y)≤Θε′.d_{E}(y,z_{0})\le\Theta\varepsilon',\quad \bigl|v(y)-L\bigr|\le\Theta\varepsilon',\quad \bigl\lVert D\psi(y)-q_{0}\bigr\rVert\le\Theta\varepsilon',\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(M)}\bigl(D^{2}\psi(y),Y\bigr)\le\Theta\varepsilon'.

Indeed, by hypothesis the quadruple (η0,vλ(η0),q0,Y)\bigl(\eta_{0},v^{\lambda}(\eta_{0}),q_{0},Y\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for vλv^{\lambda}, so clause 1 of Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data, applied with the positive real number ε′\varepsilon', provides η∈RM\eta\in\mathbb{R}^{M} and a function φ:RM→R\varphi:\mathbb{R}^{M}\to\mathbb{R} of class C2C^{2} on RM\mathbb{R}^{M} such that vλ−φv^{\lambda}-\varphi has a local maximum at η\eta relative to RM\mathbb{R}^{M} and, writing q=Dφ(η)∈RMq=D\varphi(\eta)\in\mathbb{R}^{M} and Y′=D2φ(η)∈S(M)Y'=D^{2}\varphi(\eta)\in\mathcal{S}(M),

dE(η,η0)<ε′,∣vλ(η)−vλ(η0)∣<ε′,∥q−q0∥<ε′,dS(M)(Y′,Y)<ε′.d_{E}(\eta,\eta_{0})<\varepsilon',\quad \bigl|v^{\lambda}(\eta)-v^{\lambda}(\eta_{0})\bigr|<\varepsilon',\quad \lVert q-q_{0}\rVert<\varepsilon',\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(M)}(Y',Y)<\varepsilon'.

The hypotheses of Transfer of a Test Function from the Sup-Convolution to the Original Function are met, with the present MM, vv, CC, λ\lambda and vλv^{\lambda}, with U=RMU=\mathbb{R}^{M}, with the point η\eta and with the test function φ\varphi. Choose y∈RMy\in\mathbb{R}^{M} with

vλ(η)=v(y)−λ2 ∥y−η∥2,v^{\lambda}(\eta)=v(y)-\frac{\lambda}{2}\,\lVert y-\eta\rVert^{2},

one such point existing by claim 2 of The Sup-Convolution of an Upper Semicontinuous Function Attains its Supremum, put z=y−ηz=y-\eta and let ψ\psi be the function φz\varphi_{z} of that lemma, given by ψ(x)=φ(x−z)\psi(x)=\varphi(x-z) on

U′={x∈RM:x−z∈RM}=RM.U'=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{M}:x-z\in\mathbb{R}^{M}\}=\mathbb{R}^{M}.

Its three claims give

y=η+λ−1q,v(y)=vλ(η)+12 λ−1∥q∥2,y=\eta+\lambda^{-1}q,\qquad v(y)=v^{\lambda}(\eta)+\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\lVert q\rVert^{2},

and: ψ\psi is of class C2C^{2} on RM\mathbb{R}^{M}, Dψ(y)=qD\psi(y)=q, D2ψ(y)=Y′D^{2}\psi(y)=Y', and v−ψv-\psi has a local maximum at yy relative to RM\mathbb{R}^{M}.

Since 1≤Θ1\le\Theta and 0<ε′0<\varepsilon' we have ε′≤Θε′\varepsilon'\le\Theta\varepsilon', so the third and the fourth of the asserted bounds follow at once from ∥q−q0∥<ε′\lVert q-q_{0}\rVert<\varepsilon' and dS(M)(Y′,Y)<ε′d_{\mathcal{S}(M)}(Y',Y)<\varepsilon'.

For the first, the vector space identities of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space give

y−z0=(η+λ−1q)−(η0+λ−1q0)=(η−η0)+λ−1(q−q0),y-z_{0}=\bigl(\eta+\lambda^{-1}q\bigr)-\bigl(\eta_{0}+\lambda^{-1}q_{0}\bigr)=(\eta-\eta_{0})+\lambda^{-1}(q-q_{0}),

so by claim 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (the triangle inequality) and claim 5 there (homogeneity), with ∣λ−1∣=λ−1|\lambda^{-1}|=\lambda^{-1} because λ−1\lambda^{-1} is positive,

dE(y,z0)=∥y−z0∥≤∥η−η0∥+λ−1∥q−q0∥≤ε′+λ−1ε′=(1+λ−1)ε′≤Θε′.d_{E}(y,z_{0})=\lVert y-z_{0}\rVert\le\lVert\eta-\eta_{0}\rVert+\lambda^{-1}\lVert q-q_{0}\rVert\le\varepsilon'+\lambda^{-1}\varepsilon'=\bigl(1+\lambda^{-1}\bigr)\varepsilon'\le\Theta\varepsilon'.

For the second, subtracting the two displayed value identities gives

v(y)−L=(vλ(η)−vλ(η0))+12 λ−1(∥q∥2−∥q0∥2).v(y)-L=\bigl(v^{\lambda}(\eta)-v^{\lambda}(\eta_{0})\bigr)+\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\bigl(\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert q_{0}\rVert^{2}\bigr).

Applying Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (vii) with the matrix IMI_{M}, and using Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (vi) in the case a=1a=1, which gives x⋅(IMx)=∥x∥2x\cdot(I_{M}x)=\lVert x\rVert^{2} for every xx and ∥IM∥=1\lVert I_{M}\rVert=1, we obtain

∣∥q∥2−∥q0∥2∣≤∥q−q0∥ ∥q+q0∥.\bigl|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert q_{0}\rVert^{2}\bigr|\le\lVert q-q_{0}\rVert\,\lVert q+q_{0}\rVert .

By the triangle inequality ∥q∥≤∥q−q0∥+∥q0∥<ε′+∥q0∥\lVert q\rVert\le\lVert q-q_{0}\rVert+\lVert q_{0}\rVert<\varepsilon'+\lVert q_{0}\rVert, whence

∥q+q0∥≤∥q∥+∥q0∥<2∥q0∥+ε′≤2∥q0∥+1.\lVert q+q_{0}\rVert\le\lVert q\rVert+\lVert q_{0}\rVert<2\lVert q_{0}\rVert+\varepsilon'\le 2\lVert q_{0}\rVert+1 .

Combining, and using claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (the triangle inequality and multiplicativity of the absolute value),

∣v(y)−L∣≤ε′+12 λ−1 ε′(2∥q0∥+1)=(1+12 λ−1(2∥q0∥+1))ε′≤Θε′.\bigl|v(y)-L\bigr|\le\varepsilon'+\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\,\varepsilon'\bigl(2\lVert q_{0}\rVert+1\bigr)=\Bigl(1+\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\bigl(2\lVert q_{0}\rVert+1\bigr)\Bigr)\varepsilon'\le\Theta\varepsilon'.

This proves Step 1.

Step 2 (proof of claim 1). We first show v(z0)≤Lv(z_{0})\le L. By Sup-Convolution of a Function on RM\mathbb{R}^M the number vλ(η0)v^{\lambda}(\eta_{0}) is an upper bound for the set Sλ,v(η0)S_{\lambda,v}(\eta_{0}), so taking the point z0z_{0} in that set,

v(z0)−λ2 ∥z0−η0∥2≤vλ(η0).v(z_{0})-\frac{\lambda}{2}\,\lVert z_{0}-\eta_{0}\rVert^{2}\le v^{\lambda}(\eta_{0}).

Here z0−η0=λ−1q0z_{0}-\eta_{0}=\lambda^{-1}q_{0}, so ∥z0−η0∥=λ−1∥q0∥\lVert z_{0}-\eta_{0}\rVert=\lambda^{-1}\lVert q_{0}\rVert by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, hence ∥z0−η0∥2=λ−1λ−1∥q0∥2\lVert z_{0}-\eta_{0}\rVert^{2}=\lambda^{-1}\lambda^{-1}\lVert q_{0}\rVert^{2} and, since λλ−1=1\lambda\lambda^{-1}=1,

λ2 ∥z0−η0∥2=12 λ−1∥q0∥2.\frac{\lambda}{2}\,\lVert z_{0}-\eta_{0}\rVert^{2}=\tfrac{1}{2}\,\lambda^{-1}\lVert q_{0}\rVert^{2}.

Therefore v(z0)≤Lv(z_{0})\le L.

We now show L≤v(z0)L\le v(z_{0}). Suppose, for a contradiction, that v(z0)<Lv(z_{0})<L, and put

ε=(L−v(z0))⋅2−1⋅2−1,\varepsilon=\bigl(L-v(z_{0})\bigr)\cdot 2^{-1}\cdot 2^{-1},

which is positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied twice. Since vv is upper semicontinuous at z0z_{0} relative to RM\mathbb{R}^{M}, there is a positive δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} such that every x∈RMx\in\mathbb{R}^{M} with dE(z0,x)<δd_{E}(z_{0},x)<\delta satisfies v(x)<v(z0)+εv(x)<v(z_{0})+\varepsilon. Put

ε′=min⁡{ 1, δ Θ−12−1, ε Θ−12−1 },\varepsilon'=\min\bigl\{\,1,\ \delta\,\Theta^{-1}2^{-1},\ \varepsilon\,\Theta^{-1}2^{-1}\,\bigr\},

which exists by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied twice and is positive by claims 5, 7 and 8 there. Let yy and ψ\psi be as furnished by Step 1 for this ε′\varepsilon'. From ε′≤δ Θ−12−1\varepsilon'\le\delta\,\Theta^{-1}2^{-1} and 0<Θ0<\Theta we get Θε′≤δ⋅2−1<δ\Theta\varepsilon'\le\delta\cdot2^{-1}<\delta, so

dE(z0,y)=dE(y,z0)≤Θε′<δd_{E}(z_{0},y)=d_{E}(y,z_{0})\le\Theta\varepsilon'<\delta

by the symmetry of the metric dEd_{E}, and therefore v(y)<v(z0)+εv(y)<v(z_{0})+\varepsilon. Likewise ∣v(y)−L∣≤Θε′≤ε⋅2−1<ε\bigl|v(y)-L\bigr|\le\Theta\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}<\varepsilon, and by claims 2 and 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have L−v(y)≤∣v(y)−L∣L-v(y)\le\bigl|v(y)-L\bigr|, so L<v(y)+εL<v(y)+\varepsilon. Combining the two estimates and using claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field twice,

L<v(y)+ε<v(z0)+ε+ε=v(z0)+(L−v(z0))2−1<v(z0)+(L−v(z0))=L,L<v(y)+\varepsilon<v(z_{0})+\varepsilon+\varepsilon=v(z_{0})+\bigl(L-v(z_{0})\bigr)2^{-1}<v(z_{0})+\bigl(L-v(z_{0})\bigr)=L,

a contradiction. Hence L≤v(z0)L\le v(z_{0}), and with the previous paragraph and the antisymmetry of ≤\le we conclude v(z0)=Lv(z_{0})=L, which is claim 1.

Step 3 (proof of claim 2). Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and put ε′=min⁡{1, ε Θ−12−1}\varepsilon'=\min\bigl\{1,\ \varepsilon\,\Theta^{-1}2^{-1}\bigr\}, positive as in Step 2, so that Θε′≤ε⋅2−1<ε\Theta\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}<\varepsilon. Let yy and ψ\psi be as furnished by Step 1 for this ε′\varepsilon'. By claim 1 we have v(z0)=Lv(z_{0})=L, so the four bounds of Step 1 read

dE(y,z0)<ε,∣v(y)−v(z0)∣<ε,∥Dψ(y)−q0∥<ε,dS(M)(D2ψ(y),Y)<ε,d_{E}(y,z_{0})<\varepsilon,\quad \bigl|v(y)-v(z_{0})\bigr|<\varepsilon,\quad \bigl\lVert D\psi(y)-q_{0}\bigr\rVert<\varepsilon,\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(M)}\bigl(D^{2}\psi(y),Y\bigr)<\varepsilon,

while ψ\psi is of class C2C^{2} on RM\mathbb{R}^{M} and v−ψv-\psi has a local maximum at yy relative to RM\mathbb{R}^{M}. Since ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number, clause 1 of Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data shows that the quadruple (z0,v(z0),q0,Y)\bigl(z_{0},v(z_{0}),q_{0},Y\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for vv, which is claim 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…