TheoremBase

Clause 1 follows from the boundedness of the Laplacian and the bound |S_c . Df| <= (|S_c|^2 + |Df|^2)/2 with both terms square-integrable. For clause 2 the relative score is split as the score plus ScS_c, which reduces the claim to the score identity for f; this is proved by applying the published score identity to f times a scaled smooth cutoff, whose derivatives are bounded, and passing to the limit by dominated convergence.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, cc, MM and ff are as in the statement. Borel maps are those of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps; for μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) the inner product of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is that of Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, so that ⟨η,θ⟩μ=∫Rdη⋅θ dμ\langle\eta,\theta\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\eta\cdot\theta\,d\mu for representatives η,θ\eta,\theta, and this space is a real Hilbert space by the same clause, in particular a real inner product space (Real Hilbert Space §hilbert). Elementary ordered-field arithmetic and order are used without citation (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background). Linearity and monotonicity of the integral of integrable functions are those of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, and additivity, positive homogeneity and monotonicity of the integral of nonnegative Borel functions are those of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative. A function of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous) is of class C1C^{1} and its partial derivatives are of class C1C^{1}, by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set; a smooth function is of class C2C^{2} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set.

Step 0: three general facts. (I) Domination. Let μ∈P(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), let g:Rd→Rg:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be Borel and let h:Rd→Rh:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be integrable with respect to μ\mu with ∣g(x)∣≤h(x)|g(x)|\le h(x) for every xx. Then h=∣h∣h=|h|, so ∫Rd∣g∣ dμ≤∫Rd∣h∣ dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}|g|\,d\mu\le\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}|h|\,d\mu<\infty by monotonicity of the nonnegative integral and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, and gg is integrable by that definition (∣g∣|g| being Borel by claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions). Likewise a nonnegative Borel u:Rd→Ru:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} with ∫Rdu dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}u\,d\mu<\infty is integrable, since ∣u∣=u|u|=u. Consequently, for μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}): the function x↦∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2}, Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, is integrable, its integral being M2(μ)<∞M_{2}(\mu)<\infty (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment and The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space); constant functions are integrable, being Borel (claim 1 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) and bounded (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures); and for every Borel η:Rd→Rd\eta:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty the function x↦∥η(x)∥2x\mapsto\lVert\eta(x)\rVert^{2}, Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, is integrable.

(II) Two open sets. Let rr be a positive real number, W={y∈Rd:∥y∥>r}W=\{y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:\lVert y\rVert>r\} and B={y∈Rd:∥y∥<r}B=\{y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:\lVert y\rVert<r\}. For y,y′∈Rdy,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{d} we have y=y′+(y−y′)y=y'+(y-y'), y′=y+(y′−y)y'=y+(y'-y) and ∥y−y′∥=∥y′−y∥\lVert y-y'\rVert=\lVert y'-y\rVert (claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space and the vector space structure of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space, and claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n with λ=−1\lambda=-1), and dE(y,y′)=∥y−y′∥d_{E}(y,y')=\lVert y-y'\rVert (claim 2 there). If y∈Wy\in W and ∥y−y′∥<∥y∥−r\lVert y-y'\rVert<\lVert y\rVert-r, then ∥y∥≤∥y′∥+∥y−y′∥\lVert y\rVert\le\lVert y'\rVert+\lVert y-y'\rVert by the triangle inequality (claim 6 there), so ∥y′∥>r\lVert y'\rVert>r; if y∈By\in B and ∥y−y′∥<r−∥y∥\lVert y-y'\rVert<r-\lVert y\rVert, then ∥y′∥≤∥y∥+∥y′−y∥<r\lVert y'\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert+\lVert y'-y\rVert<r. Thus each point of WW, respectively BB, is the centre of an open ball of positive radius contained in WW, respectively BB; so WW and BB are open in the metric sense, hence open by Euclidean Openness Agrees with Metric Openness on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

(III) Locality of partial derivatives. Let V⊆RdV\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{d} be open and let u,v:Rd→Ru,v:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with u(y)=v(y)u(y)=v(y) for every y∈Vy\in V. Then u∣V=v∣Vu|_{V}=v|_{V}, so by claim 1 of Restriction of a CkC^k Map to an Open Subset, for every x∈Vx\in V and l∈[d]l\in[d], ∂lu(x)=∂l(u∣V)(x)=∂l(v∣V)(x)=∂lv(x)\partial_{l}u(x)=\partial_{l}(u|_{V})(x)=\partial_{l}(v|_{V})(x)=\partial_{l}v(x). If u(y)=0u(y)=0 for every y∈Vy\in V, apply this with v=0⋅uv=0\cdot u, the function with value 00 everywhere, which is of class C1C^{1} by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set and has ∂lv=0⋅∂lu=0\partial_{l}v=0\cdot\partial_{l}u=0 by the scalar-multiple rule of claim 1 there: then ∂lu(x)=0\partial_{l}u(x)=0 for every x∈Vx\in V and l∈[d]l\in[d].

Step 1: growth bounds for ff. Put a=∣f(0Rd)∣a=|f(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})|, b=∥Df(0Rd)∥b=\lVert Df(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\rVert and A=a+b+dMA=a+b+dM; then a≥0a\ge0, b≥0b\ge0 (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) and A≥0A\ge0. Let x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. By Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §integrable, ∥Df(x)−Df(0Rd)∥≤dM∥x∥\lVert Df(x)-Df(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\rVert\le dM\lVert x\rVert and ∣f(x)∣≤a+b∥x∥+dM2∥x∥2|f(x)|\le a+b\lVert x\rVert+\tfrac{dM}{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}. Since Df(x)=Df(0Rd)+(Df(x)−Df(0Rd))Df(x)=Df(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})+(Df(x)-Df(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})) (claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space and the vector space structure of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space), the triangle inequality (claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) gives ∥Df(x)∥≤b+dM∥x∥\lVert Df(x)\rVert\le b+dM\lVert x\rVert. As dM2≤dM\tfrac{dM}{2}\le dM and ∥x∥≥0\lVert x\rVert\ge0,

∥Df(x)∥≤A(1+∥x∥),∣f(x)∣≤A(1+∥x∥+∥x∥2).(1.1)\lVert Df(x)\rVert\le A(1+\lVert x\rVert),\qquad |f(x)|\le A\bigl(1+\lVert x\rVert+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\bigr).\tag{1.1}

For i∈[d]i\in[d] the iith component of Df(x)Df(x) is ∂if(x)\partial_{i}f(x) (Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives and Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set), so claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n gives

∣∂if(x)∣≤A(1+∥x∥)(i∈[d]).(1.2)|\partial_{i}f(x)|\le A(1+\lVert x\rVert)\qquad(i\in[d]).\tag{1.2}

Step 2: clause 1. By Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function the diagonal entries of D2f(x)D^{2}f(x) are ∂i∂if(x)\partial_{i}\partial_{i}f(x), i∈[d]i\in[d], and by Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §integrable each entry of D2fD^{2}f is Borel. Hence Δf=∑i=1d∂i∂if\Delta f=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}f (The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian) is Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and for every xx, by claims 2 and 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, the hypothesis on ff, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field,

∣Δf(x)∣≤∑i=1d∣∂i∂if(x)∣≤∑i=1dM=dM.(2.1)|\Delta f(x)|\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}|\partial_{i}\partial_{i}f(x)|\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}M=dM .\tag{2.1}

So Δf\Delta f is bounded and Borel, hence integrable with respect to every probability measure on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures). The map ScS_{c} is Borel with ∫Rd∥Sc∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty for every μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), by the preamble of Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information, and the gradient map DfDf is Borel with ∫Rd∥Df∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert Df\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty for every such μ\mu, by Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §integrable. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, applied to the measurable space (Rd,B(Rd))(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d})) with u=Scu=S_{c} and v=Dfv=Df, the map x↦Sc(x)⋅Df(x)x\mapsto S_{c}(x)\cdot Df(x) is Borel, and by the inequality recorded there

∣Sc(x)⋅Df(x)∣≤12∥Sc(x)∥2+12∥Df(x)∥2(x∈Rd).|S_{c}(x)\cdot Df(x)|\le\tfrac12\lVert S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2}+\tfrac12\lVert Df(x)\rVert^{2}\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Fix μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). The right side is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Step 0 (I) and linearity, so Sc⋅DfS_{c}\cdot Df is integrable by Step 0 (I). Therefore Lcf=Δf−Sc⋅DfL_{c}f=\Delta f-S_{c}\cdot Df is Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and integrable by linearity (with coefficients 11 and −1-1), and

∫RdLcf dμ=∫RdΔf dμ−∫RdSc⋅Df dμ.(2.2)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}L_{c}f\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f\,d\mu-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}S_{c}\cdot Df\,d\mu .\tag{2.2}

This proves clause 1.

Step 3: reduction of clause 2. Let μ\mu be as in clause 2. By Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: Comparison with the Entropy, the Score and the Relative Free Energy of a Quadratic Potential §score, μ∈P2I(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), that is, μ\mu has finite Fisher information, and with its score ξμ\xi_{\mu} we have ζμc=ξμ+Sc\zeta^{c}_{\mu}=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c} in TμT_{\mu}, hence in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), since Tμ⊆L2(μ;Rd)T_{\mu}\subseteq L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent). By additivity in the first argument of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product) and Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu,

⟨ζμc,Df⟩μ=⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ+⟨Sc,Df⟩μ=⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ+∫RdSc⋅Df dμ.\langle\zeta^{c}_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}+\langle S_{c},Df\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}+\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}S_{c}\cdot Df\,d\mu .

Comparing with (2.2), clause 2 follows once we show

⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ=−∫RdΔf dμ,(3.1)\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f\,d\mu ,\tag{3.1}

for then ⟨ζμc,Df⟩μ=−(∫Δf dμ−∫Sc⋅Df dμ)=−∫Lcf dμ\langle\zeta^{c}_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}=-\bigl(\int\Delta f\,d\mu-\int S_{c}\cdot Df\,d\mu\bigr)=-\int L_{c}f\,d\mu. The rest of the proof establishes (3.1) for this fixed μ\mu.

Step 4: the cutoff approximations. The choices are made in this order. First, apply Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball with q=dq=d: fix a function χ\chi as in its statement (one exists by Existence of a Smooth Plateau Function on Euclidean Space, as recorded there), with the associated functions χR\chi_{R} for positive real RR, and then fix nonnegative real numbers m1,m2m_{1},m_{2}, not depending on RR, as in Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff. Next put

K1=(3m1+1)A,K2=7m2A+6m1A+M,K_{1}=(3m_{1}+1)A,\qquad K_{2}=7m_{2}A+6m_{1}A+M,

both nonnegative. Finally, for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map, we have 0<n0<n and 1≤n1\le n (Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field §positivity and Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field §lower-bound); let χn\chi_{n} be the cutoff χR\chi_{R} with R=nR=n, and put fn=χnff_{n}=\chi_{n}f (pointwise product), Wn={y:∥y∥>2n}W_{n}=\{y:\lVert y\rVert>2n\} and Bn={y:∥y∥<n}B_{n}=\{y:\lVert y\rVert<n\}, which are open by Step 0 (II). By Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff, χn\chi_{n} is smooth, 0≤χn≤10\le\chi_{n}\le1, χn(x)=1\chi_{n}(x)=1 whenever ∥x∥≤n\lVert x\rVert\le n, χn(x)=0\chi_{n}(x)=0 whenever ∥x∥≥2n\lVert x\rVert\ge2n, and ∣∂iχn(x)∣≤m1n−1|\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(x)|\le m_{1}n^{-1}, ∣∂j∂iχn(x)∣≤m2n−2|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(x)|\le m_{2}n^{-2} for all xx and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d].

(4a) Regularity and derivatives. As χn\chi_{n} and ff are of class C2C^{2}, so is fnf_{n}, by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set. By the product rule of claim 1 there, for all xx and i∈[d]i\in[d],

∂ifn(x)=∂iχn(x) f(x)+χn(x) ∂if(x),\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)=\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(x)\,f(x)+\chi_{n}(x)\,\partial_{i}f(x),

and, applying the sum and product rules of the same claim to this expression, whose two summands are products of functions of class C1C^{1}, for all xx and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d],

∂j∂ifn(x)=∂j∂iχn(x) f(x)+∂iχn(x) ∂jf(x)+∂jχn(x) ∂if(x)+χn(x) ∂j∂if(x).\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(x)\,f(x)+\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(x)\,\partial_{j}f(x)+\partial_{j}\chi_{n}(x)\,\partial_{i}f(x)+\chi_{n}(x)\,\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f(x).

(4b) Vanishing on WnW_{n}. For y∈Wny\in W_{n}, ∥y∥≥2n\lVert y\rVert\ge2n, so χn(y)=0\chi_{n}(y)=0 and fn(y)=0f_{n}(y)=0. By Step 0 (III) applied to fnf_{n}, ∂ifn=0\partial_{i}f_{n}=0 on WnW_{n} for every ii; applied again to the function ∂ifn\partial_{i}f_{n}, of class C1C^{1}, it gives ∂j∂ifn=0\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f_{n}=0 on WnW_{n} for all i,ji,j.

(4c) Bounds. Let x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∥x∥≤2n\lVert x\rVert\le2n, and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d]. From 1≤n1\le n and 0≤∥x∥≤2n0\le\lVert x\rVert\le2n we get n−1≤1n^{-1}\le1, n−2≤1n^{-2}\le1, n−1∥x∥≤2n^{-1}\lVert x\rVert\le2, n−1∥x∥2≤2∥x∥n^{-1}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert x\rVert, n−2∥x∥≤2n^{-2}\lVert x\rVert\le2 and n−2∥x∥2≤4n^{-2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le4. By (4a), the bounds on χn\chi_{n} and its derivatives, (1.1), (1.2), the hypothesis on ff, and the multiplicativity and triangle inequality of the absolute value (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background),

∣∂ifn(x)∣≤m1n−1A(1+∥x∥+∥x∥2)+A(1+∥x∥)≤3m1A(1+∥x∥)+A(1+∥x∥)=K1(1+∥x∥),|\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le m_{1}n^{-1}A\bigl(1+\lVert x\rVert+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\bigr)+A(1+\lVert x\rVert)\le3m_{1}A(1+\lVert x\rVert)+A(1+\lVert x\rVert)=K_{1}(1+\lVert x\rVert), ∣∂j∂ifn(x)∣≤m2n−2A(1+∥x∥+∥x∥2)+2m1n−1A(1+∥x∥)+M≤7m2A+6m1A+M=K2.|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le m_{2}n^{-2}A\bigl(1+\lVert x\rVert+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\bigr)+2m_{1}n^{-1}A(1+\lVert x\rVert)+M\le7m_{2}A+6m_{1}A+M=K_{2}.

If instead ∥x∥>2n\lVert x\rVert>2n, both derivatives vanish by (4b), and the same bounds hold because their right sides are nonnegative. Hence for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and all i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d],

∣∂ifn(x)∣≤K1(1+∥x∥),∣∂j∂ifn(x)∣≤K2,(4.1)|\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le K_{1}(1+\lVert x\rVert),\qquad|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le K_{2},\tag{4.1}

and moreover ∣∂ifn(x)∣≤K1(1+2n)|\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le K_{1}(1+2n) for every xx (by (4.1) when ∥x∥≤2n\lVert x\rVert\le2n, by (4b) otherwise).

(4d) The score identity for fnf_{n}. Put Mn′=K1(1+2n)+K2M'_{n}=K_{1}(1+2n)+K_{2}, a nonnegative real number. By (4c), fnf_{n} is of class C2C^{2} with ∣∂ifn(x)∣≤Mn′|\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le M'_{n} and ∣∂j∂ifn(x)∣≤Mn′|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le M'_{n} for all xx and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d]. Since μ\mu has finite Fisher information with score ξμ\xi_{\mu} (Step 3), Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields §score-identity and Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields §tangent, applied with the constant Mn′M'_{n} and the function fnf_{n}, give: the gradient map DfnDf_{n} is Borel and square-integrable with respect to μ\mu, Δfn\Delta f_{n} is bounded and Borel, and

⟨ξμ,Dfn⟩μ=−∫RdΔfn dμ.(4.2)\langle\xi_{\mu},Df_{n}\rangle_{\mu}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f_{n}\,d\mu .\tag{4.2}

(4e) Agreement on BnB_{n}. For y∈Bny\in B_{n}, ∥y∥≤n\lVert y\rVert\le n, so χn(y)=1\chi_{n}(y)=1 and fn(y)=f(y)f_{n}(y)=f(y). By Step 0 (III) applied to fnf_{n} and ff, ∂ifn=∂if\partial_{i}f_{n}=\partial_{i}f on BnB_{n}; applied to ∂ifn\partial_{i}f_{n} and ∂if\partial_{i}f (both of class C1C^{1}), ∂j∂ifn=∂j∂if\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f_{n}=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f on BnB_{n}. Hence, by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set and The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian, Dfn(x)=Df(x)Df_{n}(x)=Df(x) and Δfn(x)=Δf(x)\Delta f_{n}(x)=\Delta f(x) whenever ∥x∥<n\lVert x\rVert<n.

Step 5: passage to the limit. Fix a representative ξ\xi of ξμ∈Tμ⊆L2(μ;Rd)\xi_{\mu}\in T_{\mu}\subseteq L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}): a Borel map with ∫Rd∥ξ∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty (Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} put un(x)=ξ(x)⋅Dfn(x)u_{n}(x)=\xi(x)\cdot Df_{n}(x) and vn(x)=Δfn(x)v_{n}(x)=\Delta f_{n}(x); also u(x)=ξ(x)⋅Df(x)u(x)=\xi(x)\cdot Df(x). The functions unu_{n} and uu are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (with DfnDf_{n} Borel by (4d) and DfDf Borel by Step 2), and vnv_{n} is Borel by (4d). By Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, ⟨ξμ,Dfn⟩μ=∫un dμ\langle\xi_{\mu},Df_{n}\rangle_{\mu}=\int u_{n}\,d\mu and ⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ=∫u dμ\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}=\int u\,d\mu.

Pointwise convergence. Let x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. By claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∥x∥<N\lVert x\rVert<N, and for every n≥Nn\ge N in N\mathbb{N} we have N≤nN\le n in R\mathbb{R} (Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field §monotone; trivial if n=Nn=N), so ∥x∥<n\lVert x\rVert<n and, by (4e), un(x)=u(x)u_{n}(x)=u(x) and vn(x)=Δf(x)v_{n}(x)=\Delta f(x). Hence for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and every n≥Nn\ge N, ∣un(x)−u(x)∣=0<ε|u_{n}(x)-u(x)|=0<\varepsilon and ∣vn(x)−Δf(x)∣=0<ε|v_{n}(x)-\Delta f(x)|=0<\varepsilon; by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, un(x)→u(x)u_{n}(x)\to u(x) and vn(x)→Δf(x)v_{n}(x)\to\Delta f(x).

Domination. Let x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set, (4.1), claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field (applied to ∣∂ifn(x)∣≤K1(1+∥x∥)|\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le K_{1}(1+\lVert x\rVert)), claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and (1+t)2≤2(1+t2)(1+t)^{2}\le2(1+t^{2}) for real tt,

∥Dfn(x)∥2=∑i=1d(∂ifn(x))2≤dK12(1+∥x∥)2≤2dK12(1+∥x∥2).\lVert Df_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\bigl(\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)\bigr)^{2}\le dK_{1}^{2}(1+\lVert x\rVert)^{2}\le2dK_{1}^{2}\bigl(1+\lVert x\rVert^{2}\bigr).

With the inequality of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions,

∣un(x)∣≤12∥ξ(x)∥2+12∥Dfn(x)∥2≤g(x),g(x)=12∥ξ(x)∥2+dK12+dK12∥x∥2,|u_{n}(x)|\le\tfrac12\lVert\xi(x)\rVert^{2}+\tfrac12\lVert Df_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}\le g(x),\qquad g(x)=\tfrac12\lVert\xi(x)\rVert^{2}+dK_{1}^{2}+dK_{1}^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2},

and, as in (2.1), using (4.1), ∣vn(x)∣≤∑i=1d∣∂i∂ifn(x)∣≤dK2|v_{n}(x)|\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}|\partial_{i}\partial_{i}f_{n}(x)|\le dK_{2}. The function gg is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Step 0 (I) and linearity, and so is the constant dK2dK_{2}.

Conclusion. By claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem, applied on the measure space (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu) to (un)(u_{n}) with limit uu and dominating function gg, and to (vn)(v_{n}) with limit Δf\Delta f and dominating function dK2dK_{2},

∫Rdun dμ→∫Rdu dμ=⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ,∫RdΔfn dμ→∫RdΔf dμ.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}u_{n}\,d\mu\to\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}u\,d\mu=\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu},\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f_{n}\,d\mu\to\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f\,d\mu .

By Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar, −∫Δfn dμ→−∫Δf dμ-\int\Delta f_{n}\,d\mu\to-\int\Delta f\,d\mu. By (4.2) the sequences (∫un dμ)n\bigl(\int u_{n}\,d\mu\bigr)_{n} and (−∫Δfn dμ)n\bigl(-\int\Delta f_{n}\,d\mu\bigr)_{n} coincide, so by uniqueness of limits (claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences) ⟨ξμ,Df⟩μ=−∫RdΔf dμ\langle\xi_{\mu},Df\rangle_{\mu}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta f\,d\mu. This is (3.1), and by Step 3 clause 2 follows.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…