TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout we use the criterion recorded with the definition of measurability: a map v:X→Rv:X\to\mathbb{R} is measurable if and only if {x∈X:v(x)>c}∈F\{x\in X:v(x)>c\}\in\mathcal{F} for every real number cc.

Claim 1. Fix x∈Xx\in X. The set {fn(x):n∈N}\{f_n(x):n\in\mathbb{N}\} is nonempty and bounded above by KK and below by −K-K, so by the least upper bound property of the real numbers it has a real supremum g(x)g(x) and a real infimum h(x)h(x), and ∣g(x)∣≤K|g(x)|\le K, ∣h(x)∣≤K|h(x)|\le K.

Fix a real number cc. If g(x)>cg(x)>c then cc is not an upper bound of {fn(x):n∈N}\{f_n(x):n\in\mathbb{N}\}, so fn(x)>cf_n(x)>c for some nn; conversely, if fn(x)>cf_n(x)>c for some nn then g(x)≥fn(x)>cg(x)\ge f_n(x)>c. Therefore

{x∈X:g(x)>c}=⋃n∈N{x∈X:fn(x)>c},\{x\in X:g(x)>c\}=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\{x\in X:f_n(x)>c\},

a countable union of members of F\mathcal{F}, which lies in F\mathcal{F} because F\mathcal{F} is a σ\sigma-algebra. Hence gg is measurable.

Next, each −fn-f_n is measurable: for a real number cc,

{x∈X:−fn(x)>c}={x∈X:fn(x)<−c}=⋃k∈N(X∖{x∈X:fn(x)>−c−1k}),\{x\in X:-f_n(x)>c\}=\{x\in X:f_n(x)<-c\}=\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\Big(X\setminus\{x\in X:f_n(x)>-c-\tfrac{1}{k}\}\Big),

since fn(x)<−cf_n(x)<-c holds if and only if fn(x)≤−c−1kf_n(x)\le-c-\frac{1}{k} for some natural number kk; each set on the right lies in F\mathcal{F}, and F\mathcal{F} is closed under complements and countable unions. The maps −fn-f_n are bounded in absolute value by KK, so by the paragraph above sup⁡n(−fn)\sup_n(-f_n) is measurable. For any nonempty set of real numbers bounded above and below, the infimum of the set equals the negative of the supremum of the set of negatives, so h=−sup⁡n(−fn)h=-\sup_n(-f_n); applying the negation argument once more, hh is measurable.

Claim 2. For each natural number nn put gn(x)=sup⁡k≥nfk(x)g_n(x)=\sup_{k\ge n}f_k(x). Claim 1, applied to the family (fn+j)j∈N(f_{n+j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}}, which is measurable and bounded in absolute value by KK, shows that gng_n is real-valued and measurable with ∣gn∣≤K|g_n|\le K.

Fix x∈Xx\in X. Since gn(x)≥fk(x)g_n(x)\ge f_k(x) for every k≥nk\ge n, and fk(x)→f(x)f_k(x)\to f(x), passing to the limit in kk gives gn(x)≥f(x)g_n(x)\ge f(x) for every nn. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and choose NN with ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣<ε|f_k(x)-f(x)|<\varepsilon for all k≥Nk\ge N; then fk(x)≤f(x)+εf_k(x)\le f(x)+\varepsilon for k≥Nk\ge N, so gN(x)≤f(x)+εg_N(x)\le f(x)+\varepsilon. Consequently f(x)≤inf⁡ngn(x)≤f(x)+εf(x)\le\inf_n g_n(x)\le f(x)+\varepsilon for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, whence f(x)=inf⁡ngn(x)f(x)=\inf_n g_n(x). By Claim 1 applied to the sequence (gn)(g_n), the map f=inf⁡ngnf=\inf_n g_n is measurable.

Claim 3. Fix a real number cc and set E={t∈[a,b]:u(t)>c}E=\{t\in[a,b]:u(t)>c\}. If t∈Et\in E and t≤t′≤bt\le t'\le b, then u(t′)≥u(t)>cu(t')\ge u(t)>c, so t′∈Et'\in E. If EE is empty it is a Borel subset of [a,b][a,b]. Otherwise EE is nonempty and bounded below by aa, so it has a real infimum s∈[a,b]s\in[a,b], and the implication just proved gives

(s,b]⊆E⊆[s,b].(s,b]\subseteq E\subseteq[s,b].

Indeed, if s<t′≤bs<t'\le b then t′t' is not a lower bound of EE, so some t∈Et\in E satisfies t<t′t<t', and hence t′∈Et'\in E; and every element of EE is at least ss and at most bb. Therefore EE equals (s,b](s,b] or [s,b][s,b], and in either case EE is the intersection of [a,b][a,b] with an interval of the real line, hence a member of the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra on [a,b][a,b]. By the criterion recalled at the start, uu is measurable.

Claim 4. Let u:[a,b]→Ru:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} be continuous on [a,b][a,b], the interval regarded as a subset of the real line with the absolute value metric, let cc be a real number, and set U={t∈[a,b]:u(t)>c}U=\{t\in[a,b]:u(t)>c\}. Let t0∈Ut_0\in U. By continuity at t0t_0 relative to [a,b][a,b], applied with the positive number u(t0)−cu(t_0)-c in the role of ε\varepsilon, there is δ>0\delta>0 such that ∣u(t)−u(t0)∣<u(t0)−c|u(t)-u(t_0)|<u(t_0)-c, and hence u(t)>cu(t)>c, for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] with ∣t−t0∣<δ|t-t_0|<\delta. Choosing rational numbers p,qp,q with t0−δ<p<t0<q<t0+δt_0-\delta<p<t_0<q<t_0+\delta gives t0∈(p,q)∩[a,b]⊆Ut_0\in(p,q)\cap[a,b]\subseteq U. Therefore

U=⋃{(p,q)∩[a,b] : p,q rational, (p,q)∩[a,b]⊆U},U=\bigcup\Big\{(p,q)\cap[a,b]\ :\ p,q\text{ rational},\ (p,q)\cap[a,b]\subseteq U\Big\},

a union of a countable collection of members of the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra, hence itself a member. By the criterion recalled at the start, uu is measurable. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…