Sketch: each rule follows from an algebraic identity for the difference quotient and the triangle inequality, the chain rule through a difference-quotient function continuous at f(z), powers by induction, and the exponential from the difference-quotient estimate.
Throughout, routine facts about complex numbers and maps are used without comment (Routine Facts, Continued: Typed Arithmetic, Maps and Predicativity); in particular, a function given by a formula exists and takes the stated values, and two maps with the same values are equal (Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map as a Defined Set Symbol (v), Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map as a Defined Set Symbol (iv)). The continuity results cited below that are stated for the earlier definitions of metric spaces and continuity are read in the current ones by The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Metric Spaces, Convergence, Continuity and Compactness Agree (i) and The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Metric Spaces, Convergence, Continuity and Compactness Agree (vii).
The plan is the one of Carathéodory's approach to the derivative: we first prove (i), and every later rule is then obtained by writing down the function that the criterion asks for. When and are complex differentiable at , we write for the functions that (i) provides for them, so that and are continuous at relative to , , , and
Carathéodory's criterion, necessity. Suppose that is complex differentiable at with , so that is the unique complex derivative of at (The Complex Derivative at a Point (ii)). Define by cases (Maps Defined by Cases (i)):
Then , and the identity holds for by multiplying out, and for because both sides are . It remains to see that is continuous at relative to . Distances in are moduli of differences (Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (v)). Let , and choose for this as in The Complex Derivative at a Point (i). Let with . If , then is exactly the modulus of the difference quotient minus bounded there, so it is less than ; if , it is . Hence this serves for in Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i).
Carathéodory's criterion, sufficiency. Conversely, let be continuous at relative to , with and for . For with we may divide by and obtain
Let , and choose for this by the continuity of at . Then every with satisfies , which is the inequality of The Complex Derivative at a Point (i). So is a complex derivative of at ; thus is complex differentiable at , and by The Complex Derivative at a Point (ii).
Continuity. Let be complex differentiable at . By (i),
The right-hand side is built from constant functions, the identity and by sums and products. The constants and the identity are continuous at relative to by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and so is ; hence is continuous at relative to by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii).
Restriction. Let be as in (iii) and let be complex differentiable at . The restrictions and are functions taking the values of and of (Domains and Restrictions of Maps (ii), Domains and Restrictions of Maps (iii)). Since , the identity of (i) gives
and . Moreover is continuous at relative to by Restricting a Continuous Map to a Smaller Subset Preserves Continuity (i). Applying (i) to on the open set in place of , we conclude that is complex differentiable at with .
Constants and the identity. If is constant with value , then , so the constant function serves as in (i). If , then , so the constant function serves. Both are continuous at relative to by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and their values at are and , so the derivatives are and .
Sums and constant multiples. Let and be complex differentiable at . For ,
The functions and are continuous at relative to by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii), with values and at . By (i), and are complex differentiable at , with
Products. Let and be complex differentiable at . For , writing and inserting the identities for and gives
The function is continuous at relative to : is continuous there by (ii), the constant by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and sums and products of continuous functions are continuous by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii). Its value at is . By (i), is complex differentiable at and
Reciprocals. Let be complex differentiable at , with for every . For ,
The coefficient of is the product of , of and of the constant . Here is continuous at by (ii), hence so is by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iv); the constant is continuous by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and so the product is continuous at relative to by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii). Its value at is , so by (i) the function is complex differentiable at and
Quotients. Let and be complex differentiable at , with nowhere on . The functions and have the same values, so they are equal. By (ix), is complex differentiable at , and then by (viii) so is , with
The chain rule. Let and be as in (xi), with complex differentiable at and complex differentiable at . Let be the function that (i) provides for at : it is continuous at relative to , , and for . Taking and then using the identity for , we get for
Since is continuous at relative to by (ii), the composite is continuous at relative to by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (v), and hence so is the coefficient , by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii). Its value at is . By (i), is complex differentiable at and
Powers. For let be the function . We prove by induction on that is complex differentiable at with
For we have (Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality (ii)), so is the identity, which by (v) has derivative at (Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero (ii)). Suppose the claim holds for . Since (Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality (i)), is the product of and the identity, and (viii) together with the induction hypothesis and (v) shows that it is complex differentiable at with derivative
This completes the induction.
Loading…