TheoremBase

Sketch: each rule follows from an algebraic identity for the difference quotient and the triangle inequality, the chain rule through a difference-quotient function continuous at f(z), powers by induction, and the exponential from the difference-quotient estimate.

Proof

Throughout, routine facts about complex numbers and maps are used without comment (Routine Facts, Continued: Typed Arithmetic, Maps and Predicativity); in particular, a function given by a formula exists and takes the stated values, and two maps with the same values are equal (Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (v), Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (iv)). The continuity results cited below that are stated for the earlier definitions of metric spaces and continuity are read in the current ones by The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Metric Spaces, Convergence, Continuity and Compactness Agree (i) and The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Metric Spaces, Convergence, Continuity and Compactness Agree (vii).

The plan is the one of Carathéodory's approach to the derivative: we first prove (i), and every later rule is then obtained by writing down the function φ\varphi that the criterion asks for. When ff and gg are complex differentiable at zz, we write φf,φg:U→C\varphi_{f},\varphi_{g}:U\to\mathbb{C} for the functions that (i) provides for them, so that φf\varphi_{f} and φg\varphi_{g} are continuous at zz relative to UU, φf(z)=f′(z)\varphi_{f}(z)=f'(z), φg(z)=g′(z)\varphi_{g}(z)=g'(z), and

f(w)−f(z)=φf(w) (w−z),g(w)−g(z)=φg(w) (w−z)(w∈U).f(w)-f(z)=\varphi_{f}(w)\,(w-z),\qquad g(w)-g(z)=\varphi_{g}(w)\,(w-z)\qquad(w\in U).

Carathéodory's criterion, necessity. Suppose that ff is complex differentiable at zz with f′(z)=Lf'(z)=L, so that LL is the unique complex derivative of ff at zz (The Complex Derivative at a Point (ii)). Define φ:U→C\varphi:U\to\mathbb{C} by cases (Maps Defined by Cases (i)):

φ(w)=f(w)−f(z)w−z(w∈U, w≠z),φ(z)=L.\varphi(w)=\frac{f(w)-f(z)}{w-z}\quad(w\in U,\ w\neq z),\qquad \varphi(z)=L .

Then φ(z)=L\varphi(z)=L, and the identity f(w)−f(z)=φ(w) (w−z)f(w)-f(z)=\varphi(w)\,(w-z) holds for w≠zw\neq z by multiplying out, and for w=zw=z because both sides are 00. It remains to see that φ\varphi is continuous at zz relative to UU. Distances in C\mathbb{C} are moduli of differences (Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (v)). Let ε>0\varepsilon>0, and choose δ>0\delta>0 for this ε\varepsilon as in The Complex Derivative at a Point (i). Let w∈Uw\in U with ∣w−z∣<δ|w-z|<\delta. If w≠zw\neq z, then ∣φ(w)−φ(z)∣|\varphi(w)-\varphi(z)| is exactly the modulus of the difference quotient minus LL bounded there, so it is less than ε\varepsilon; if w=zw=z, it is 00. Hence this δ\delta serves for ε\varepsilon in Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i).

Carathéodory's criterion, sufficiency. Conversely, let φ:U→C\varphi:U\to\mathbb{C} be continuous at zz relative to UU, with φ(z)=L\varphi(z)=L and f(w)−f(z)=φ(w) (w−z)f(w)-f(z)=\varphi(w)\,(w-z) for w∈Uw\in U. For w∈Uw\in U with w≠zw\neq z we may divide by w−zw-z and obtain

f(w)−f(z)w−z−L=φ(w)−φ(z).\frac{f(w)-f(z)}{w-z}-L=\varphi(w)-\varphi(z).

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0, and choose δ>0\delta>0 for this ε\varepsilon by the continuity of φ\varphi at zz. Then every w∈Uw\in U with 0<∣w−z∣<δ0<|w-z|<\delta satisfies ∣φ(w)−φ(z)∣<ε|\varphi(w)-\varphi(z)|<\varepsilon, which is the inequality of The Complex Derivative at a Point (i). So LL is a complex derivative of ff at zz; thus ff is complex differentiable at zz, and f′(z)=Lf'(z)=L by The Complex Derivative at a Point (ii).

Continuity. Let ff be complex differentiable at zz. By (i),

f(w)=f(z)+φf(w) (w−z)(w∈U).f(w)=f(z)+\varphi_{f}(w)\,(w-z)\qquad(w\in U).

The right-hand side is built from constant functions, the identity w↦ww\mapsto w and φf\varphi_{f} by sums and products. The constants and the identity are continuous at zz relative to UU by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and so is φf\varphi_{f}; hence ff is continuous at zz relative to UU by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii).

Restriction. Let WW be as in (iii) and let ff be complex differentiable at zz. The restrictions f∣Wf|_{W} and φf∣W\varphi_{f}|_{W} are functions W→CW\to\mathbb{C} taking the values of ff and of φf\varphi_{f} (Domains and Restrictions of Maps (ii), Domains and Restrictions of Maps (iii)). Since W⊆UW\subseteq U, the identity of (i) gives

f∣W(w)−f∣W(z)=φf∣W(w) (w−z)(w∈W),f|_{W}(w)-f|_{W}(z)=\varphi_{f}|_{W}(w)\,(w-z)\qquad(w\in W),

and φf∣W(z)=f′(z)\varphi_{f}|_{W}(z)=f'(z). Moreover φf∣W\varphi_{f}|_{W} is continuous at zz relative to WW by Restricting a Continuous Map to a Smaller Subset Preserves Continuity (i). Applying (i) to f∣Wf|_{W} on the open set WW in place of UU, we conclude that f∣Wf|_{W} is complex differentiable at zz with (f∣W)′(z)=f′(z)(f|_{W})'(z)=f'(z).

Constants and the identity. If ff is constant with value cc, then f(w)−f(z)=0=0⋅(w−z)f(w)-f(z)=0=0\cdot(w-z), so the constant function 00 serves as φ\varphi in (i). If f(w)=wf(w)=w, then f(w)−f(z)=1⋅(w−z)f(w)-f(z)=1\cdot(w-z), so the constant function 11 serves. Both are continuous at zz relative to UU by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and their values at zz are 00 and 11, so the derivatives are 00 and 11.

Sums and constant multiples. Let ff and gg be complex differentiable at zz. For w∈Uw\in U,

(f+g)(w)−(f+g)(z)=(φf(w)+φg(w))(w−z),(λf)(w)−(λf)(z)=λφf(w) (w−z).(f+g)(w)-(f+g)(z)=\bigl(\varphi_{f}(w)+\varphi_{g}(w)\bigr)(w-z),\qquad (\lambda f)(w)-(\lambda f)(z)=\lambda\varphi_{f}(w)\,(w-z).

The functions φf+φg\varphi_{f}+\varphi_{g} and λφf\lambda\varphi_{f} are continuous at zz relative to UU by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii), with values f′(z)+g′(z)f'(z)+g'(z) and λf′(z)\lambda f'(z) at zz. By (i), f+gf+g and λf\lambda f are complex differentiable at zz, with

(f+g)′(z)=f′(z)+g′(z),(λf)′(z)=λf′(z).(f+g)'(z)=f'(z)+g'(z),\qquad (\lambda f)'(z)=\lambda f'(z).

Products. Let ff and gg be complex differentiable at zz. For w∈Uw\in U, writing f(w)g(w)−f(z)g(z)=(f(w)−f(z))g(w)+f(z)(g(w)−g(z))f(w)g(w)-f(z)g(z)=\bigl(f(w)-f(z)\bigr)g(w)+f(z)\bigl(g(w)-g(z)\bigr) and inserting the identities for φf\varphi_{f} and φg\varphi_{g} gives

f(w)g(w)−f(z)g(z)=(φf(w) g(w)+f(z) φg(w))(w−z).f(w)g(w)-f(z)g(z)=\bigl(\varphi_{f}(w)\,g(w)+f(z)\,\varphi_{g}(w)\bigr)(w-z).

The function w↦φf(w) g(w)+f(z) φg(w)w\mapsto\varphi_{f}(w)\,g(w)+f(z)\,\varphi_{g}(w) is continuous at zz relative to UU: gg is continuous there by (ii), the constant f(z)f(z) by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and sums and products of continuous functions are continuous by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii). Its value at zz is f′(z)g(z)+f(z)g′(z)f'(z)g(z)+f(z)g'(z). By (i), fgfg is complex differentiable at zz and

(fg)′(z)=f′(z) g(z)+f(z) g′(z).(fg)'(z)=f'(z)\,g(z)+f(z)\,g'(z).

Reciprocals. Let gg be complex differentiable at zz, with g(w)≠0g(w)\neq0 for every w∈Uw\in U. For w∈Uw\in U,

1g(w)−1g(z)=g(z)−g(w)g(w) g(z)=−φg(w)g(w) g(z) (w−z).\frac{1}{g(w)}-\frac{1}{g(z)}=\frac{g(z)-g(w)}{g(w)\,g(z)}=-\frac{\varphi_{g}(w)}{g(w)\,g(z)}\,(w-z).

The coefficient of w−zw-z is the product of φg\varphi_{g}, of 1/g1/g and of the constant −1/g(z)-1/g(z). Here gg is continuous at zz by (ii), hence so is 1/g1/g by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iv); the constant is continuous by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (ii), and so the product is continuous at zz relative to UU by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii). Its value at zz is −g′(z)/g(z)2-g'(z)/g(z)^{2}, so by (i) the function 1/g1/g is complex differentiable at zz and

(1g)′(z)=−g′(z)g(z)2.\Bigl(\frac{1}{g}\Bigr)'(z)=-\frac{g'(z)}{g(z)^{2}}.

Quotients. Let ff and gg be complex differentiable at zz, with gg nowhere 00 on UU. The functions f/gf/g and f⋅(1/g)f\cdot(1/g) have the same values, so they are equal. By (ix), 1/g1/g is complex differentiable at zz, and then by (viii) so is f/gf/g, with

(fg)′(z)=f′(z) 1g(z)+f(z)(−g′(z)g(z)2)=f′(z) g(z)−f(z) g′(z)g(z)2.\Bigl(\frac{f}{g}\Bigr)'(z)=f'(z)\,\frac{1}{g(z)}+f(z)\Bigl(-\frac{g'(z)}{g(z)^{2}}\Bigr)=\frac{f'(z)\,g(z)-f(z)\,g'(z)}{g(z)^{2}}.

The chain rule. Let VV and hh be as in (xi), with ff complex differentiable at zz and hh complex differentiable at f(z)f(z). Let ψ:V→C\psi:V\to\mathbb{C} be the function that (i) provides for hh at f(z)f(z): it is continuous at f(z)f(z) relative to VV, ψ(f(z))=h′(f(z))\psi(f(z))=h'(f(z)), and h(v)−h(f(z))=ψ(v) (v−f(z))h(v)-h(f(z))=\psi(v)\,(v-f(z)) for v∈Vv\in V. Taking v=f(w)v=f(w) and then using the identity for φf\varphi_{f}, we get for w∈Uw\in U

h(f(w))−h(f(z))=ψ(f(w)) (f(w)−f(z))=ψ(f(w)) φf(w) (w−z).h(f(w))-h(f(z))=\psi(f(w))\,\bigl(f(w)-f(z)\bigr)=\psi(f(w))\,\varphi_{f}(w)\,(w-z).

Since ff is continuous at zz relative to UU by (ii), the composite ψ∘f\psi\circ f is continuous at zz relative to UU by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (v), and hence so is the coefficient (ψ∘f) φf(\psi\circ f)\,\varphi_{f}, by Continuity of Complex-Valued Functions, and the Modulus of a Power (iii). Its value at zz is h′(f(z)) f′(z)h'(f(z))\,f'(z). By (i), h∘fh\circ f is complex differentiable at zz and

(h∘f)′(z)=h′(f(z)) f′(z).(h\circ f)'(z)=h'\bigl(f(z)\bigr)\,f'(z).

Powers. For n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0} let fn:U→Cf_{n}:U\to\mathbb{C} be the function fn(w)=wn+1f_{n}(w)=w^{n+1}. We prove by induction on nn that fnf_{n} is complex differentiable at zz with

fn′(z)=(n+1) zn.f_{n}'(z)=(n+1)\,z^{n}.

For n=0n=0 we have w1=ww^{1}=w (Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality (ii)), so f0f_{0} is the identity, which by (v) has derivative 1=1⋅z01=1\cdot z^{0} at zz (Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero (ii)). Suppose the claim holds for nn. Since wn+2=wn+1 ww^{n+2}=w^{n+1}\,w (Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality (i)), fn+1f_{n+1} is the product of fnf_{n} and the identity, and (viii) together with the induction hypothesis and (v) shows that it is complex differentiable at zz with derivative

(n+1) zn⋅z+zn+1⋅1=(n+2) zn+1.(n+1)\,z^{n}\cdot z+z^{n+1}\cdot1=(n+2)\,z^{n+1}.

This completes the induction.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…