TheoremBase

Proof of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line

lemmalem:derivative-smoothness-real-line-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the agreement of the one-dimensional derivative with the first partial derivative, and of the smoothness criterion for families closed under differentiation.

Proof

Claim 1. The defining condition of Interval in the Real Line holds for R\mathbb{R} because every real number lies in R\mathbb{R}, so R\mathbb{R} is an interval. Let xRx\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we have 0<10<1, hence 1<0-1<0 by claim 4 of that lemma; adding xx to each of these, by claim 1 of that lemma, gives x1<xx-1<x and x<x+1x<x+1. Since x1x-1 and x+1x+1 lie in R\mathbb{R}, the point xx is an interior point of R\mathbb{R} by Interior Point of an Interval.

Claim 2. By claim 1 of Polynomial Functions on the Real Line are Smooth, R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is an open subset of R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, so Slice Function and the Partial Derivative applies with n=1n=1, U=R1U=\mathbb{R}^{1}, a=xa=x and i=1i=1. In that situation the point written a[s]a[s] there is ss itself, so the slice function of ff at xx in the first variable is the restriction fIf|_{I} of ff to the interval

I={sR:xρ<s and s<x+ρ},I=\{s\in\mathbb{R}: x-\rho<s\text{ and }s<x+\rho\},

where ρR\rho\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ρ0<\rho is an admissible radius as in claim 1 of that lemma, and xx is an interior point of II. Claim 2 of that lemma states that 1f(x)\partial_{1}f(x) exists if and only if fIf|_{I} is differentiable at xx, and that the two values then agree.

It therefore suffices to show that ff is differentiable at xx with derivative LL if and only if fIf|_{I} is differentiable at xx with derivative LL.

Suppose first that ff is differentiable at xx with derivative LL, and let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Take δ\delta as in Derivative at an Interior Point for ff and ε\varepsilon. If hRh\in\mathbb{R} satisfies 0<h<δ0<|h|<\delta and x+hIx+h\in I, then in particular x+hRx+h\in\mathbb{R}, so the required bound on the difference quotient holds. Hence fIf|_{I} is differentiable at xx with derivative LL.

Conversely, suppose that fIf|_{I} is differentiable at xx with derivative LL, and let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Take δ\delta as in Derivative at an Interior Point for fIf|_{I} and ε\varepsilon, and let δ\delta' be the smaller of δ\delta and ρ\rho, which exists by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and satisfies 0<δ0<\delta'. If hRh\in\mathbb{R} satisfies 0<h<δ0<|h|<\delta', then h<ρ|h|<\rho, so xρ<x+h<x+ρx-\rho<x+h<x+\rho by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, whence x+hIx+h\in I; and h<δ|h|<\delta, so the required bound on the difference quotient holds. Hence ff is differentiable at xx with derivative LL.

Claim 3. We first record that every fDf\in D is continuous at every point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} in the Euclidean sense. Indeed, ff is differentiable at every point of R\mathbb{R}, and R\mathbb{R} is an interval all of whose points are interior by claim 1, so Differentiability at an Interior Point Implies Continuity There shows that ff is continuous at every point of R\mathbb{R} as a map into the real line with the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line; by claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions this is the same as continuity in the Euclidean sense at every point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1}.

Next, every fDf\in D is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}. Indeed, ff is continuous at every point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} by the previous paragraph; by claim 2 the partial derivative of ff with respect to the first variable exists at every point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} and the function 1f\partial_{1}f is the function xf(x)x\mapsto f'(x), which belongs to DD and is therefore also continuous at every point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1}. Since R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is open in R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set give that ff is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}.

Now let EE be the set of those natural numbers kk such that every fDf\in D is of class CkC^{k} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}. By the previous paragraph, 1E1\in E. Let kEk\in E and let fDf\in D. Then ff is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, and 1f\partial_{1}f is the function xf(x)x\mapsto f'(x), which belongs to DD and hence is of class CkC^{k} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} because kEk\in E. Since k+1=S(k)k+1=S(k) for the successor map SS of Natural Numbers, by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set gives that ff is of class CS(k)C^{S(k)} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}. Hence S(k)ES(k)\in E.

By Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, E=NE=\mathbb{N}, so every fDf\in D is of class CkC^{k} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} for every natural number kk, that is, smooth on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…