TheoremBase

Proof of Uncorrelated Jointly Gaussian Blocks are Independent

theoremthm:gaussian-uncorrelated-independent-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the uncorrelated-blocks theorem via Gram-Schmidt coordinates, the orthonormal-combinations theorem, the grouping lemma, and null-set transfer.

Proof

Fix a Gaussian representation of the combined vector: mm (zero or a natural number), independent standard normal Z1,…,ZmZ_1,\dots,Z_m, real numbers ΞΌi,Ξ½k\mu_i,\nu_k, and, when mβ‰₯1m\ge1, vectors x1,…,xdx_1,\dots,x_d and y1,…,yqy_1,\dots,y_q in Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} collecting the coefficients, so that, writing vβ‹…Z=βˆ‘j=1mvjZjv\cdot Z=\sum_{j=1}^{m}v_jZ_j,

P(Xi=ΞΌi+xiβ‹…Z)=1,P(Yk=Ξ½k+ykβ‹…Z)=1.P(X_i=\mu_i+x_i\cdot Z)=1,\qquad P(Y_k=\nu_k+y_k\cdot Z)=1 .

Step 1: Orthonormal coordinates for each block. Assume mβ‰₯1m\ge1 (the case m=0m=0 is noted in Step 4). Apply Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization to x1,…,xdx_1,\dots,x_d: either all xix_i are zero, in which case set s=0s=0, or obtain sβ‰₯1s\ge1 and an orthonormal family e1,…,ese_1,\dots,e_s in Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} with the expansion and span properties of that lemma. Similarly obtain t=0t=0, or tβ‰₯1t\ge1 and an orthonormal family f1,…,ftf_1,\dots,f_t for y1,…,yqy_1,\dots,y_q.

Step 2: Cross-orthogonality. By Claim 2 of Square-Integrability, Moments, and Covariance Matrix of a Gaussian Random Vector applied to the fixed representation, Cov⁑(Xi,Yk)=βˆ‘j=1mxij ykj=xiβ‹…yk\operatorname{Cov}(X_i,Y_k)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}x_{ij}\,y_{kj}=x_i\cdot y_k with the dot product, so the hypothesis gives xiβ‹…yk=0x_i\cdot y_k=0 for all i,ki,k. If sβ‰₯1s\ge1 and tβ‰₯1t\ge1: by the span property of Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization of a Finite Family of Vectors, each eue_u is a linear combination of the xix_i and each fvf_v of the yky_k, so bilinearity of the dot product gives euβ‹…fv=βˆ‘i,kcui cvk′ (xiβ‹…yk)=0e_u\cdot f_v=\sum_{i,k}c_{ui}\,c'_{vk}\,(x_i\cdot y_k)=0. Together with the orthonormality of each family, (e1,…,es,f1,…,ft)(e_1,\dots,e_s,f_1,\dots,f_t) is an orthonormal family in Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}.

Step 3: Independent Gaussian coordinates. Define ΞΎu=euβ‹…Z\xi_u=e_u\cdot Z (1≀u≀s1\le u\le s) and Ξ·v=fvβ‹…Z\eta_v=f_v\cdot Z (1≀v≀t1\le v\le t). By Orthonormal Linear Combinations of Independent Standard Normal Random Variables, (ΞΎ1,…,ΞΎs,Ξ·1,…,Ξ·t)(\xi_1,\dots,\xi_s,\eta_1,\dots,\eta_t) is an independent standard normal family. If sβ‰₯1s\ge1 and tβ‰₯1t\ge1, the grouping lemma applied with the blocks {1,…,s}\{1,\dots,s\} and {s+1,…,s+t}\{s+1,\dots,s+t\} shows that G1=Οƒ(ΞΎ1,…,ΞΎs)\mathcal{G}_1=\sigma(\xi_1,\dots,\xi_s) and G2=Οƒ(Ξ·1,…,Ξ·t)\mathcal{G}_2=\sigma(\eta_1,\dots,\eta_t) are independent Οƒ\sigma-algebras. If s=0s=0 (respectively t=0t=0), set G1={βˆ…,Ξ©}\mathcal{G}_1=\{\emptyset,\Omega\} (respectively G2={βˆ…,Ξ©}\mathcal{G}_2=\{\emptyset,\Omega\}); the pair G1,G2\mathcal{G}_1,\mathcal{G}_2 is then independent for any choice of the other Οƒ\sigma-algebra, since P(βˆ…βˆ©A)=0=P(βˆ…)P(A)P(\emptyset\cap A)=0=P(\emptyset)P(A) and P(Ω∩A)=P(A)=P(Ξ©)P(A)P(\Omega\cap A)=P(A)=P(\Omega)P(A) for every event AA.

Step 4: Almost-sure block representatives. Define

X~i=ΞΌi+βˆ‘u=1s(xiβ‹…eu) ξu,Y~k=Ξ½k+βˆ‘v=1t(ykβ‹…fv) ηv,\widetilde{X}_i=\mu_i+\sum_{u=1}^{s}(x_i\cdot e_u)\,\xi_u,\qquad \widetilde{Y}_k=\nu_k+\sum_{v=1}^{t}(y_k\cdot f_v)\,\eta_v,

with empty sums equal to 00; in the case m=0m=0, likewise take X~i=ΞΌi\widetilde{X}_i=\mu_i, Y~k=Ξ½k\widetilde{Y}_k=\nu_k, s=t=0s=t=0, and G1=G2={βˆ…,Ξ©}\mathcal{G}_1=\mathcal{G}_2=\{\emptyset,\Omega\} as in Step 3. If sβ‰₯1s\ge1, the expansion property of Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization of a Finite Family of Vectors and rearrangement of finite sums give, pointwise on Ξ©\Omega,

xiβ‹…Z=βˆ‘u=1s(xiβ‹…eu) (euβ‹…Z)=βˆ‘u=1s(xiβ‹…eu) ξu,x_i\cdot Z=\sum_{u=1}^{s}(x_i\cdot e_u)\,(e_u\cdot Z)=\sum_{u=1}^{s}(x_i\cdot e_u)\,\xi_u,

so X~i=ΞΌi+xiβ‹…Z\widetilde{X}_i=\mu_i+x_i\cdot Z pointwise and P(Xi=X~i)=1P(X_i=\widetilde{X}_i)=1; if s=0s=0 then every xix_i is zero (or m=0m=0) and again P(Xi=ΞΌi)=P(Xi=X~i)=1P(X_i=\mu_i)=P(X_i=\widetilde{X}_i)=1. Each X~i\widetilde{X}_i is G1\mathcal{G}_1-measurable: constants are measurable with respect to every Οƒ\sigma-algebra, the ΞΎu\xi_u are Οƒ(ΞΎ1,…,ΞΎs)\sigma(\xi_1,\dots,\xi_s)-measurable by Sigma-Algebra Generated by Random Variables and Independence of Sigma-Algebras, and sums and scalar multiples preserve measurability by the preliminaries of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. Symmetrically, P(Yk=Y~k)=1P(Y_k=\widetilde{Y}_k)=1 and Y~k\widetilde{Y}_k is G2\mathcal{G}_2-measurable.

Step 5: Null-set transfer. Let N=⋃i=1d{Xiβ‰ X~i}βˆͺ⋃k=1q{Ykβ‰ Y~k}N=\bigcup_{i=1}^{d}\{X_i\ne\widetilde{X}_i\}\cup\bigcup_{k=1}^{q}\{Y_k\ne\widetilde{Y}_k\}; then P(N)=0P(N)=0, as a finite union of events of probability 00 (countable additivity and monotonicity of the measure PP). For subsets A,A~A,\widetilde{A} of Ξ©\Omega write A △ A~=(Aβˆ–A~)βˆͺ(A~βˆ–A)A\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}=(A\setminus\widetilde{A})\cup(\widetilde{A}\setminus A). The family

D={AβŠ†Ξ©:Β thereΒ isΒ A~∈G1Β withΒ A △ A~βŠ†N}\mathcal{D}=\bigl\{A\subseteq\Omega:\ \text{there is }\widetilde{A}\in\mathcal{G}_1\text{ with }A\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}\subseteq N\bigr\}

is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra: Ω △ Ω=βˆ…βŠ†N\Omega\,\triangle\,\Omega=\emptyset\subseteq N; complements satisfy (Ξ©βˆ–A) △ (Ξ©βˆ–A~)=A △ A~(\Omega\setminus A)\,\triangle\,(\Omega\setminus\widetilde{A})=A\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}; and countable unions satisfy (⋃lAl) △ (⋃lA~l)βŠ†β‹ƒl(Al △ A~l)βŠ†N\bigl(\bigcup_lA_l\bigr)\,\triangle\,\bigl(\bigcup_l\widetilde{A}_l\bigr)\subseteq\bigcup_l\bigl(A_l\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}_l\bigr)\subseteq N. For every Borel set BB and every ii, the generator Xiβˆ’1(B)X_i^{-1}(B) of Οƒ(X1,…,Xd)\sigma(X_1,\dots,X_d) lies in D\mathcal{D}, with A~=X~iβˆ’1(B)∈G1\widetilde{A}=\widetilde{X}_i^{-1}(B)\in\mathcal{G}_1 and A △ A~βŠ†{Xiβ‰ X~i}βŠ†NA\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}\subseteq\{X_i\ne\widetilde{X}_i\}\subseteq N. Since Οƒ(X1,…,Xd)\sigma(X_1,\dots,X_d) is the smallest Οƒ\sigma-algebra containing these generators (Sigma-Algebra Generated by Random Variables and Independence of Sigma-Algebras), Οƒ(X1,…,Xd)βŠ†D\sigma(X_1,\dots,X_d)\subseteq\mathcal{D}. Symmetrically, every Aβ€²βˆˆΟƒ(Y1,…,Yq)A'\in\sigma(Y_1,\dots,Y_q) admits A~β€²βˆˆG2\widetilde{A}'\in\mathcal{G}_2 with A′ △ A~β€²βŠ†NA'\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}'\subseteq N.

Step 6: Conclusion. Let AβˆˆΟƒ(X1,…,Xd)A\in\sigma(X_1,\dots,X_d) and Aβ€²βˆˆΟƒ(Y1,…,Yq)A'\in\sigma(Y_1,\dots,Y_q), and choose A~∈G1\widetilde{A}\in\mathcal{G}_1, A~β€²βˆˆG2\widetilde{A}'\in\mathcal{G}_2 as in Step 5. From AβŠ†A~βˆͺNA\subseteq\widetilde{A}\cup N and A~βŠ†AβˆͺN\widetilde{A}\subseteq A\cup N, monotonicity and additivity of PP give P(A)=P(A~ )P(A)=P(\widetilde{A}\,); likewise P(Aβ€²)=P(A~β€²)P(A')=P(\widetilde{A}'); and since (A∩Aβ€²) △ (A~∩A~β€²)βŠ†(A △ A~)βˆͺ(A′ △ A~β€²)βŠ†N(A\cap A')\,\triangle\,(\widetilde{A}\cap\widetilde{A}')\subseteq(A\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A})\cup(A'\,\triangle\,\widetilde{A}')\subseteq N, also P(A∩Aβ€²)=P(A~∩A~β€²)P(A\cap A')=P(\widetilde{A}\cap\widetilde{A}'). By the independence of G1\mathcal{G}_1 and G2\mathcal{G}_2 from Step 3,

P(A∩Aβ€²)=P(A~∩A~β€²)=P(A~ ) P(A~β€²)=P(A) P(Aβ€²).P(A\cap A')=P(\widetilde{A}\cap\widetilde{A}')=P(\widetilde{A}\,)\,P(\widetilde{A}')=P(A)\,P(A').

As AA and Aβ€²A' were arbitrary, the Οƒ\sigma-algebras Οƒ(X1,…,Xd)\sigma(X_1,\dots,X_d) and Οƒ(Y1,…,Yq)\sigma(Y_1,\dots,Y_q) are independent in the sense of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Random Variables and Independence of Sigma-Algebras. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…