TheoremBase

Proof of The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Vector-Valued Functions is a Real Inner Product Space

lemmalem:l2-interval-inner-product-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published proof of lem:l2-interval-inner-product-2026a.

Proof

Throughout write λ=λ[0,T]\lambda=\lambda_{[0,T]} and B=B[0,T]\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}, and let every integral be over [0,T][0,T] with respect to λ\lambda unless another measure is displayed. All appeals to linearity and monotonicity of the integral are to linearity and monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral. We use throughout that Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is a real vector space, that the dot product is symmetric and linear in each argument, and that x2=xx=i=1d(xi)2|x|^{2}=x\cdot x=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(x^{i})^{2}, by claim 1 of the elementary properties of the Euclidean norm.

Claim 1. Let u,vL2([0,T];Rd)u,v\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}), so all components ui,viu^{i},v^{i} are B\mathcal{B}-measurable. The maps xx2x\mapsto|x|^{2} from Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} to R\mathbb{R} and (x,y)xy(x,y)\mapsto x\cdot y from R2d\mathbb{R}^{2d} to R\mathbb{R} are polynomial in the coordinates, hence continuous and in particular sequentially continuous, so tu(t)2t\mapsto|u(t)|^{2} and tu(t)v(t)t\mapsto u(t)\cdot v(t) are B\mathcal{B}-measurable by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps.

For every t[0,T]t\in[0,T], expanding the nonnegative quantities u(t)±v(t)2|u(t)\pm v(t)|^{2} by bilinearity of the dot product gives

0u(t)2±2u(t)v(t)+v(t)2,0\le|u(t)|^{2}\pm2\,u(t)\cdot v(t)+|v(t)|^{2},

and taking whichever sign makes the middle term equal to 2u(t)v(t)-2|u(t)\cdot v(t)| yields the pointwise bound 2uvu2+v22|u\cdot v|\le|u|^{2}+|v|^{2}. The right-hand side is measurable with finite integral, so by monotonicity and linearity

uv12(u2+v2)=12([u]L22+[v]L22)<,\int|u\cdot v|\le\tfrac{1}{2}\Bigl(\int|u|^{2}+\int|v|^{2}\Bigr)=\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl(\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}+\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\bigr)<\infty,

so uvu\cdot v is integrable.

Claim 2. The components of u+vu+v and of cucu are ui+viu^{i}+v^{i} and cuicu^{i}, which are B\mathcal{B}-measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable applied to the continuous maps (s,r)s+r(s,r)\mapsto s+r and scss\mapsto cs. Pointwise u+v2=u2+2uv+v22u2+2v2|u+v|^{2}=|u|^{2}+2\,u\cdot v+|v|^{2}\le2|u|^{2}+2|v|^{2} by the bound of claim 1, so u+v22u2+2v2<\int|u+v|^{2}\le2\int|u|^{2}+2\int|v|^{2}<\infty. Also cu2=c2u2|cu|^{2}=c^{2}|u|^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, whose integral is c2u2<c^{2}\int|u|^{2}<\infty. Hence L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) is closed under the pointwise operations. Because those operations are performed in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} separately at each tt, every vector-space axiom holds in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) because it holds in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} at each tt; the constant map 00 is square-integrable and is the zero element.

Claim 3. Finite unions of null sets are null. Let N1,N2BN_{1},N_{2}\in\mathcal{B} with λ(N1)=λ(N2)=0\lambda(N_{1})=\lambda(N_{2})=0. Since λ\lambda is a measure, applying countable additivity to the disjoint decomposition N2=(N2N1)(N2N1)N_{2}=(N_{2}\setminus N_{1})\cup(N_{2}\cap N_{1}) gives λ(N2N1)λ(N2)=0\lambda(N_{2}\setminus N_{1})\le\lambda(N_{2})=0, and applying it to N1N2=N1(N2N1)N_{1}\cup N_{2}=N_{1}\cup(N_{2}\setminus N_{1}) gives λ(N1N2)=λ(N1)+λ(N2N1)=0\lambda(N_{1}\cup N_{2})=\lambda(N_{1})+\lambda(N_{2}\setminus N_{1})=0. Induction extends this to any finite union.

\sim is an equivalence relation. Reflexivity holds with N=N=\emptyset, symmetry with the same NN, and transitivity by the preceding paragraph applied to the union of the two exceptional sets.

Vanishing criterion. Let w=uvw=u-v, which lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by claim 2, and put g=w2g=|w|^{2}, a nonnegative real-valued B\mathcal{B}-measurable function by claim 1. Suppose first that uvu\sim v, so that gg vanishes off some NBN\in\mathcal{B} with λ(N)=0\lambda(N)=0. For each natural number nn the function gn=min(g,n)g_{n}=\min(g,n) is B\mathcal{B}-measurable and satisfies gnn1Ng_{n}\le n\mathbf{1}_{N} pointwise, since both sides vanish off NN while gnng_{n}\le n everywhere. Now n1Nn\mathbf{1}_{N} is a nonnegative simple function of integral nλ(N)=0n\lambda(N)=0, so gn=0\int g_{n}=0 by monotonicity. The sequence (gn)n(g_{n})_{n} is nondecreasing with pointwise limit gg, so g=limngn=0\int g=\lim_{n}\int g_{n}=0 by monotone convergence. Conversely, suppose g=0\int g=0. By claim 5 of the restricted Lebesgue toolkit, the set N={t[0,T]:g(t)>0}N=\{t\in[0,T]:g(t)>0\} satisfies λ(N)=0\lambda(N)=0; it belongs to B\mathcal{B} because gg is measurable. For tNt\notin N we have w(t)2=0|w(t)|^{2}=0, hence w(t)=0w(t)=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, that is u(t)=v(t)u(t)=v(t). So uvu\sim v.

Compatibility and the quotient. If u=uu=u' off a null N1N_{1} and v=vv=v' off a null N2N_{2}, then u+v=u+vu+v=u'+v' off the null set N1N2N_{1}\cup N_{2} and cu=cucu=cu' off N1N_{1}; hence [u]+[v]=[u+v][u]+[v]=[u+v] and c[u]=[cu]c[u]=[cu] are independent of the representatives chosen. The vector-space axioms transfer from L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) to the quotient by applying the class map to each axiom, and [0][0] is the zero element.

Claim 4. Let uuu\sim u' and vvv\sim v', with exceptional null sets N1N_{1} and N2N_{2}. The function h=uvuvh=u\cdot v-u'\cdot v' is integrable by claim 1 and linearity, and vanishes off the null set N1N2N_{1}\cup N_{2}. The first half of the vanishing criterion of claim 3 used only that the function in question is nonnegative, measurable, and vanishes off a null set; the function h|h| has all three properties, being nonnegative, B\mathcal{B}-measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable applied to the continuous map sss\mapsto|s| on R\mathbb{R} and to the measurable function hh, and zero off N1N2N_{1}\cup N_{2}; applying that argument to h|h| gives h=0\int|h|=0. Since hhh\le|h| and hh-h\le|h| pointwise, monotonicity and linearity give hh=0\bigl|\int h\bigr|\le\int|h|=0, so uv=uv\int u\cdot v=\int u'\cdot v'. Thus ,L2\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^{2}} is well defined on L2([0,T];Rd)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}), and taking v=uv=u, v=uv'=u' shows the same for L2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{L^{2}}.

Symmetry of the pairing is pointwise symmetry of the dot product. For linearity in the first argument, let u,uL2([0,T];Rd)u,u''\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) and cc real; then (cu+u)v=c(uv)+uv(cu+u'')\cdot v=c(u\cdot v)+u''\cdot v pointwise, all three products are integrable by claim 1, and linearity of the integral gives c[u]+[u],[v]L2=c[u],[v]L2+[u],[v]L2\langle c[u]+[u''],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}}=c\langle[u],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}}+\langle[u''],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}}. Linearity in the second argument follows by symmetry. Finally [u],[u]L2=u2=[u]L220\langle[u],[u]\rangle_{L^{2}}=\int|u|^{2}=\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\ge0 because the integrand is nonnegative, and by the vanishing criterion of claim 3 applied with v=0v=0, [u]L2=0\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}=0 holds exactly when u2=0\int|u|^{2}=0, exactly when u0u\sim0, exactly when [u]=[0][u]=[0].

Claim 5. Absolute homogeneity: c[u]L22=cu2=c2u2\lVert c[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\int|cu|^{2}=c^{2}\int|u|^{2}, so c[u]L2=c[u]L2\lVert c[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}=|c|\,\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}} by uniqueness of the nonnegative square root.

Write A=[u]L22A=\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}, B=[u],[v]L2B=\langle[u],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}} and C=[v]L22C=\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}. For every real ss the element u+svu+sv lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by claim 2, and expanding by claim 4,

0[u]+s[v]L22=A+2sB+s2C.0\le\lVert[u]+s[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=A+2sB+s^{2}C .

If C=0C=0 then [v]=[0][v]=[0] by claim 4, whence B=0B=0 and B2ACB^{2}\le AC holds trivially. If C>0C>0, the choice s=B/Cs=-B/C gives 0AB2/C0\le A-B^{2}/C, that is B2ACB^{2}\le AC. Taking nonnegative square roots yields B[u]L2[v]L2|B|\le\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Consequently

[u]+[v]L22=A+2B+CA+2[u]L2[v]L2+C=([u]L2+[v]L2)2,\lVert[u]+[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=A+2B+C\le A+2\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}+C=\bigl(\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}+\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2},

and taking nonnegative square roots gives the triangle inequality.

Claim 6. The quantity dL2([u],[v])=[u][v]L2d_{L^{2}}([u],[v])=\lVert[u]-[v]\rVert_{L^{2}} is a nonnegative real number, and it vanishes exactly when [u][v]=[0][u]-[v]=[0], that is when [u]=[v][u]=[v], by claim 4. Symmetry follows from absolute homogeneity with c=1c=-1, and the triangle inequality for dL2d_{L^{2}} from that of claim 5 applied to [u][w]=([u][v])+([v][w])[u]-[w]=([u]-[v])+([v]-[w]). These are precisely the axioms of a metric space.

Claim 7. Scaling of the integral. Let f:[0,T][0,]f:[0,T]\to[0,\infty] be B\mathcal{B}-measurable. If s=r=1pcr1Ers=\sum_{r=1}^{p}c_{r}\mathbf{1}_{E_{r}} is a nonnegative simple function with ErBE_{r}\in\mathcal{B}, then by the integral of a simple function,

sdPT=r=1pcrPT(Er)=T1r=1pcrλ(Er)=T1sdλ.\int s\,dP_{T}=\sum_{r=1}^{p}c_{r}P_{T}(E_{r})=T^{-1}\sum_{r=1}^{p}c_{r}\lambda(E_{r})=T^{-1}\int s\,d\lambda .

Whether a nonnegative simple function ss satisfies sfs\le f pointwise does not depend on the measure, so by the definition of the integral of a nonnegative measurable function the set of numbers {sdPT}\{\int s\,dP_{T}\}, taken over nonnegative simple sfs\le f, is exactly the set {T1sdλ}\{T^{-1}\int s\,d\lambda\} taken over the same family. Since T1>0T^{-1}>0, multiplication by T1T^{-1} carries upper bounds to upper bounds in both directions, so the least upper bound of the first set is T1T^{-1} times that of the second, with the convention that both are \infty together. Hence fdPT=T1fdλ\int f\,dP_{T}=T^{-1}\int f\,d\lambda.

Characterisation of L2\mathcal{L}^{2}. By claim 1 of the restricted Lebesgue toolkit, ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) is a probability space, and a random variable on it is exactly a B\mathcal{B}-measurable real-valued function, so the measurability requirement is the same in both descriptions. Each (ui)2(u^{i})^{2} is nonnegative and B\mathcal{B}-measurable, and u2=i=1d(ui)2|u|^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(u^{i})^{2} pointwise, so linearity gives u2dλ=i=1d(ui)2dλ\int|u|^{2}\,d\lambda=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\int(u^{i})^{2}\,d\lambda. By the scaling identity, the expectation on ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) satisfies E[(ui)2]=T1(ui)2dλ\mathbb{E}[(u^{i})^{2}]=T^{-1}\int(u^{i})^{2}\,d\lambda. As all terms are nonnegative, u2dλ\int|u|^{2}\,d\lambda is finite if and only if E[(ui)2]\mathbb{E}[(u^{i})^{2}] is finite for every ii, that is if and only if each uiu^{i} is a square-integrable random variable. In that case

[u]L22=u2dλ=i=1dTE[(ui)2]=Ti=1dui22.\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\int|u|^{2}\,d\lambda=\sum_{i=1}^{d}T\,\mathbb{E}[(u^{i})^{2}]=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert u^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2}.

Almost-sure equality. If uvu\sim v with exceptional set NN, then PT(N)=T1λ(N)=0P_{T}(N)=T^{-1}\lambda(N)=0 and ui=viu^{i}=v^{i} off NN for each ii, so each uiu^{i} equals viv^{i} almost surely. Conversely, suppose for each ii that ui=viu^{i}=v^{i} almost surely. The set Ni={t[0,T]:ui(t)vi(t)}N_{i}=\{t\in[0,T]:u^{i}(t)\ne v^{i}(t)\} lies in B\mathcal{B}, being the set where the measurable function uiviu^{i}-v^{i} is nonzero, and PT(Ni)=0P_{T}(N_{i})=0, hence λ(Ni)=TPT(Ni)=0\lambda(N_{i})=T\,P_{T}(N_{i})=0. By the first paragraph of claim 3 the finite union N=i=1dNiN=\bigcup_{i=1}^{d}N_{i} is null, and u=vu=v off NN, so uvu\sim v.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…