TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout write λ=λ[0,T]\lambda=\lambda_{[0,T]} and B=B[0,T]\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}, and let every integral be over [0,T][0,T] with respect to λ\lambda unless another measure is displayed. All appeals to linearity and monotonicity of the integral are to linearity and monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral. We use throughout that Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is a real vector space, that the dot product is symmetric and linear in each argument, and that ∣x∣2=x⋅x=∑i=1d(xi)2|x|^{2}=x\cdot x=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(x^{i})^{2}, by claim 1 of the elementary properties of the Euclidean norm.

Claim 1. Let u,v∈L2([0,T];Rd)u,v\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}), so all components ui,viu^{i},v^{i} are B\mathcal{B}-measurable. The maps x↦∣x∣2x\mapsto|x|^{2} from Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} to R\mathbb{R} and (x,y)↦x⋅y(x,y)\mapsto x\cdot y from R2d\mathbb{R}^{2d} to R\mathbb{R} are polynomial in the coordinates, hence continuous and in particular sequentially continuous, so t↦∣u(t)∣2t\mapsto|u(t)|^{2} and t↦u(t)⋅v(t)t\mapsto u(t)\cdot v(t) are B\mathcal{B}-measurable by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps.

For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], expanding the nonnegative quantities ∣u(t)±v(t)∣2|u(t)\pm v(t)|^{2} by bilinearity of the dot product gives

0≤∣u(t)∣2±2 u(t)⋅v(t)+∣v(t)∣2,0\le|u(t)|^{2}\pm2\,u(t)\cdot v(t)+|v(t)|^{2},

and taking whichever sign makes the middle term equal to −2∣u(t)⋅v(t)∣-2|u(t)\cdot v(t)| yields the pointwise bound 2∣u⋅v∣≤∣u∣2+∣v∣22|u\cdot v|\le|u|^{2}+|v|^{2}. The right-hand side is measurable with finite integral, so by monotonicity and linearity

∫∣u⋅v∣≤12(∫∣u∣2+∫∣v∣2)=12(∥[u]∥L22+∥[v]∥L22)<∞,\int|u\cdot v|\le\tfrac{1}{2}\Bigl(\int|u|^{2}+\int|v|^{2}\Bigr)=\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl(\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}+\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\bigr)<\infty,

so u⋅vu\cdot v is integrable.

Claim 2. The components of u+vu+v and of cucu are ui+viu^{i}+v^{i} and cuicu^{i}, which are B\mathcal{B}-measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable applied to the continuous maps (s,r)↦s+r(s,r)\mapsto s+r and s↦css\mapsto cs. Pointwise ∣u+v∣2=∣u∣2+2 u⋅v+∣v∣2≤2∣u∣2+2∣v∣2|u+v|^{2}=|u|^{2}+2\,u\cdot v+|v|^{2}\le2|u|^{2}+2|v|^{2} by the bound of claim 1, so ∫∣u+v∣2≤2∫∣u∣2+2∫∣v∣2<∞\int|u+v|^{2}\le2\int|u|^{2}+2\int|v|^{2}<\infty. Also ∣cu∣2=c2∣u∣2|cu|^{2}=c^{2}|u|^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, whose integral is c2∫∣u∣2<∞c^{2}\int|u|^{2}<\infty. Hence L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) is closed under the pointwise operations. Because those operations are performed in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} separately at each tt, every vector-space axiom holds in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) because it holds in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} at each tt; the constant map 00 is square-integrable and is the zero element.

Claim 3. Finite unions of null sets are null. Let N1,N2∈BN_{1},N_{2}\in\mathcal{B} with λ(N1)=λ(N2)=0\lambda(N_{1})=\lambda(N_{2})=0. Since λ\lambda is a measure, applying countable additivity to the disjoint decomposition N2=(N2∖N1)∪(N2∩N1)N_{2}=(N_{2}\setminus N_{1})\cup(N_{2}\cap N_{1}) gives λ(N2∖N1)≤λ(N2)=0\lambda(N_{2}\setminus N_{1})\le\lambda(N_{2})=0, and applying it to N1∪N2=N1∪(N2∖N1)N_{1}\cup N_{2}=N_{1}\cup(N_{2}\setminus N_{1}) gives λ(N1∪N2)=λ(N1)+λ(N2∖N1)=0\lambda(N_{1}\cup N_{2})=\lambda(N_{1})+\lambda(N_{2}\setminus N_{1})=0. Induction extends this to any finite union.

∼\sim is an equivalence relation. Reflexivity holds with N=∅N=\emptyset, symmetry with the same NN, and transitivity by the preceding paragraph applied to the union of the two exceptional sets.

Vanishing criterion. Let w=u−vw=u-v, which lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by claim 2, and put g=∣w∣2g=|w|^{2}, a nonnegative real-valued B\mathcal{B}-measurable function by claim 1. Suppose first that u∼vu\sim v, so that gg vanishes off some N∈BN\in\mathcal{B} with λ(N)=0\lambda(N)=0. For each natural number nn the function gn=min⁡(g,n)g_{n}=\min(g,n) is B\mathcal{B}-measurable and satisfies gn≤n1Ng_{n}\le n\mathbf{1}_{N} pointwise, since both sides vanish off NN while gn≤ng_{n}\le n everywhere. Now n1Nn\mathbf{1}_{N} is a nonnegative simple function of integral nλ(N)=0n\lambda(N)=0, so ∫gn=0\int g_{n}=0 by monotonicity. The sequence (gn)n(g_{n})_{n} is nondecreasing with pointwise limit gg, so ∫g=lim⁡n∫gn=0\int g=\lim_{n}\int g_{n}=0 by monotone convergence. Conversely, suppose ∫g=0\int g=0. By claim 5 of the restricted Lebesgue toolkit, the set N={t∈[0,T]:g(t)>0}N=\{t\in[0,T]:g(t)>0\} satisfies λ(N)=0\lambda(N)=0; it belongs to B\mathcal{B} because gg is measurable. For t∉Nt\notin N we have ∣w(t)∣2=0|w(t)|^{2}=0, hence w(t)=0w(t)=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, that is u(t)=v(t)u(t)=v(t). So u∼vu\sim v.

Compatibility and the quotient. If u=u′u=u' off a null N1N_{1} and v=v′v=v' off a null N2N_{2}, then u+v=u′+v′u+v=u'+v' off the null set N1∪N2N_{1}\cup N_{2} and cu=cu′cu=cu' off N1N_{1}; hence [u]+[v]=[u+v][u]+[v]=[u+v] and c[u]=[cu]c[u]=[cu] are independent of the representatives chosen. The vector-space axioms transfer from L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) to the quotient by applying the class map to each axiom, and [0][0] is the zero element.

Claim 4. Let u∼u′u\sim u' and v∼v′v\sim v', with exceptional null sets N1N_{1} and N2N_{2}. The function h=u⋅v−u′⋅v′h=u\cdot v-u'\cdot v' is integrable by claim 1 and linearity, and vanishes off the null set N1∪N2N_{1}\cup N_{2}. The first half of the vanishing criterion of claim 3 used only that the function in question is nonnegative, measurable, and vanishes off a null set; the function ∣h∣|h| has all three properties, being nonnegative, B\mathcal{B}-measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable applied to the continuous map s↦∣s∣s\mapsto|s| on R\mathbb{R} and to the measurable function hh, and zero off N1∪N2N_{1}\cup N_{2}; applying that argument to ∣h∣|h| gives ∫∣h∣=0\int|h|=0. Since h≤∣h∣h\le|h| and −h≤∣h∣-h\le|h| pointwise, monotonicity and linearity give ∣∫h∣≤∫∣h∣=0\bigl|\int h\bigr|\le\int|h|=0, so ∫u⋅v=∫u′⋅v′\int u\cdot v=\int u'\cdot v'. Thus ⟨⋅,⋅⟩L2\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^{2}} is well defined on L2([0,T];Rd)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}), and taking v=uv=u, v′=u′v'=u' shows the same for ∥⋅∥L2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{L^{2}}.

Symmetry of the pairing is pointwise symmetry of the dot product. For linearity in the first argument, let u,u′′∈L2([0,T];Rd)u,u''\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) and cc real; then (cu+u′′)⋅v=c(u⋅v)+u′′⋅v(cu+u'')\cdot v=c(u\cdot v)+u''\cdot v pointwise, all three products are integrable by claim 1, and linearity of the integral gives ⟨c[u]+[u′′],[v]⟩L2=c⟨[u],[v]⟩L2+⟨[u′′],[v]⟩L2\langle c[u]+[u''],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}}=c\langle[u],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}}+\langle[u''],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}}. Linearity in the second argument follows by symmetry. Finally ⟨[u],[u]⟩L2=∫∣u∣2=∥[u]∥L22≥0\langle[u],[u]\rangle_{L^{2}}=\int|u|^{2}=\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\ge0 because the integrand is nonnegative, and by the vanishing criterion of claim 3 applied with v=0v=0, ∥[u]∥L2=0\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}=0 holds exactly when ∫∣u∣2=0\int|u|^{2}=0, exactly when u∼0u\sim0, exactly when [u]=[0][u]=[0].

Claim 5. Absolute homogeneity: ∥c[u]∥L22=∫∣cu∣2=c2∫∣u∣2\lVert c[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\int|cu|^{2}=c^{2}\int|u|^{2}, so ∥c[u]∥L2=∣c∣ ∥[u]∥L2\lVert c[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}=|c|\,\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}} by uniqueness of the nonnegative square root.

Write A=∥[u]∥L22A=\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}, B=⟨[u],[v]⟩L2B=\langle[u],[v]\rangle_{L^{2}} and C=∥[v]∥L22C=\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}. For every real ss the element u+svu+sv lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by claim 2, and expanding by claim 4,

0≤∥[u]+s[v]∥L22=A+2sB+s2C.0\le\lVert[u]+s[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=A+2sB+s^{2}C .

If C=0C=0 then [v]=[0][v]=[0] by claim 4, whence B=0B=0 and B2≤ACB^{2}\le AC holds trivially. If C>0C>0, the choice s=−B/Cs=-B/C gives 0≤A−B2/C0\le A-B^{2}/C, that is B2≤ACB^{2}\le AC. Taking nonnegative square roots yields ∣B∣≤∥[u]∥L2∥[v]∥L2|B|\le\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Consequently

∥[u]+[v]∥L22=A+2B+C≤A+2∥[u]∥L2∥[v]∥L2+C=(∥[u]∥L2+∥[v]∥L2)2,\lVert[u]+[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=A+2B+C\le A+2\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}+C=\bigl(\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}+\lVert[v]\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2},

and taking nonnegative square roots gives the triangle inequality.

Claim 6. The quantity dL2([u],[v])=∥[u]−[v]∥L2d_{L^{2}}([u],[v])=\lVert[u]-[v]\rVert_{L^{2}} is a nonnegative real number, and it vanishes exactly when [u]−[v]=[0][u]-[v]=[0], that is when [u]=[v][u]=[v], by claim 4. Symmetry follows from absolute homogeneity with c=−1c=-1, and the triangle inequality for dL2d_{L^{2}} from that of claim 5 applied to [u]−[w]=([u]−[v])+([v]−[w])[u]-[w]=([u]-[v])+([v]-[w]). These are precisely the axioms of a metric space.

Claim 7. Scaling of the integral. Let f:[0,T]→[0,∞]f:[0,T]\to[0,\infty] be B\mathcal{B}-measurable. If s=∑r=1pcr1Ers=\sum_{r=1}^{p}c_{r}\mathbf{1}_{E_{r}} is a nonnegative simple function with Er∈BE_{r}\in\mathcal{B}, then by the integral of a simple function,

∫s dPT=∑r=1pcrPT(Er)=T−1∑r=1pcrλ(Er)=T−1∫s dλ.\int s\,dP_{T}=\sum_{r=1}^{p}c_{r}P_{T}(E_{r})=T^{-1}\sum_{r=1}^{p}c_{r}\lambda(E_{r})=T^{-1}\int s\,d\lambda .

Whether a nonnegative simple function ss satisfies s≤fs\le f pointwise does not depend on the measure, so by the definition of the integral of a nonnegative measurable function the set of numbers {∫s dPT}\{\int s\,dP_{T}\}, taken over nonnegative simple s≤fs\le f, is exactly the set {T−1∫s dλ}\{T^{-1}\int s\,d\lambda\} taken over the same family. Since T−1>0T^{-1}>0, multiplication by T−1T^{-1} carries upper bounds to upper bounds in both directions, so the least upper bound of the first set is T−1T^{-1} times that of the second, with the convention that both are ∞\infty together. Hence ∫f dPT=T−1∫f dλ\int f\,dP_{T}=T^{-1}\int f\,d\lambda.

Characterisation of L2\mathcal{L}^{2}. By claim 1 of the restricted Lebesgue toolkit, ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) is a probability space, and a random variable on it is exactly a B\mathcal{B}-measurable real-valued function, so the measurability requirement is the same in both descriptions. Each (ui)2(u^{i})^{2} is nonnegative and B\mathcal{B}-measurable, and ∣u∣2=∑i=1d(ui)2|u|^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(u^{i})^{2} pointwise, so linearity gives ∫∣u∣2 dλ=∑i=1d∫(ui)2 dλ\int|u|^{2}\,d\lambda=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\int(u^{i})^{2}\,d\lambda. By the scaling identity, the expectation on ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) satisfies E[(ui)2]=T−1∫(ui)2 dλ\mathbb{E}[(u^{i})^{2}]=T^{-1}\int(u^{i})^{2}\,d\lambda. As all terms are nonnegative, ∫∣u∣2 dλ\int|u|^{2}\,d\lambda is finite if and only if E[(ui)2]\mathbb{E}[(u^{i})^{2}] is finite for every ii, that is if and only if each uiu^{i} is a square-integrable random variable. In that case

∥[u]∥L22=∫∣u∣2 dλ=∑i=1dT E[(ui)2]=T∑i=1d∥ui∥22.\lVert[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\int|u|^{2}\,d\lambda=\sum_{i=1}^{d}T\,\mathbb{E}[(u^{i})^{2}]=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert u^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2}.

Almost-sure equality. If u∼vu\sim v with exceptional set NN, then PT(N)=T−1λ(N)=0P_{T}(N)=T^{-1}\lambda(N)=0 and ui=viu^{i}=v^{i} off NN for each ii, so each uiu^{i} equals viv^{i} almost surely. Conversely, suppose for each ii that ui=viu^{i}=v^{i} almost surely. The set Ni={t∈[0,T]:ui(t)≠vi(t)}N_{i}=\{t\in[0,T]:u^{i}(t)\ne v^{i}(t)\} lies in B\mathcal{B}, being the set where the measurable function ui−viu^{i}-v^{i} is nonzero, and PT(Ni)=0P_{T}(N_{i})=0, hence λ(Ni)=T PT(Ni)=0\lambda(N_{i})=T\,P_{T}(N_{i})=0. By the first paragraph of claim 3 the finite union N=⋃i=1dNiN=\bigcup_{i=1}^{d}N_{i} is null, and u=vu=v off NN, so u∼vu\sim v.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…