Sketch: the first two clauses from the factorial equation that characterises multinomial coefficients; the count by induction on m, sorting the maps by their fibre over the last value.
Throughout, a multinomial coefficient is the unique satisfying its defining equation in The Multinomial Coefficient (i) (Existence and Uniqueness of the Multinomial Coefficients (i)), and the product of factorials there is written ; sums and products in are regrouped and reordered by Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (iii), Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (iv), Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (v) and Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (vi). Write .
Step 1 ((i)). Let , and let be the tuple extending by (Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples (vi)). Splitting off the last term (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii)),
Let and , so that . Since and (Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (vii), The Difference of Two Natural Numbers with Zero (i)), Binomial Coefficients: Existence and Uniqueness by Pascal's Recursion, Vanishing above the Diagonal, Diagonal and First Values, the Factorial Formula and Symmetry (v) gives . Hence
and by uniqueness is the multinomial coefficient of , which is the claim.
Step 2 ((ii)). Let . For the pair the entries add up to and the product of their factorials is (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (i), Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii)). Since and , Binomial Coefficients: Existence and Uniqueness by Pascal's Recursion, Vanishing above the Diagonal, Diagonal and First Values, the Factorial Formula and Symmetry (v) gives
so is the multinomial coefficient by uniqueness.
Step 3 (the claim for (iii)). For , and a finite set let
the set of admissible maps; it is finite, as a subset of the finite set , and the fibres are finite as subsets of (Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (ix), Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iv)). We show by induction on (The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion (viii)) that for every and every finite set with ,
The case , , is (iii), since (Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products (i)).
Step 4 (one value). Let ; then , and the entries of add up to (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (i)). There is exactly one map , the one with value everywhere (Maps Formed Pointwise: Constant Maps, Pairs of Values, Maps Applied to Values, and Families of Maps (i)); its fibre over is , which has elements. So has exactly one element (Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products (ii)). On the other side, (Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (iii)), so by uniqueness.
Step 5 (sorting by the fibre over the last value). Assume the claim for . Let , let be the tuple of its first entries (Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples (vi)), and put , so that (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii)). Let be a finite set with . Recall that with . Each has a fibre with elements, so
is a map (The k-Element Subsets of a Set (ii)), into a finite set with elements (Counting Subsets (i)).
Step 6 (each fibre of ). Let and . Then by Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products (v), so by Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (v). Let . A point is not in , so and ; hence the restriction (Domains and Restrictions of Maps (ii)), read as a map (Gluing Maps on Disjoint Domains, and Shrinking the Codomain (iii)), is defined. For , no point of is mapped to , so the fibre of over is , with elements. Thus restriction is a map
It is injective: two elements of with the same restriction agree on and take the value everywhere on . It is surjective: given , take with codomain (Gluing Maps on Disjoint Domains, and Shrinking the Codomain (iii)) and glue it with the map of constant value with value (Maps Formed Pointwise: Constant Maps, Pairs of Values, Maps Applied to Values, and Families of Maps (i), Gluing Maps on Disjoint Domains, and Shrinking the Codomain (i)); this gives a map whose fibre over is , because takes its values in , and whose fibre over is , with elements. So and . Since , Counting through Bijections, Injections and Surjections (i) and the induction hypothesis give
Step 7 (counting). All fibres of have the same number of elements, so by Counting by Fibres, Double Counting and the Pigeonhole Principle (iv), Step 5 and (i), applied to in place of ,
This is the claim for , which completes the induction and proves (iii).
Loadingβ¦