Reason: Re-grounded on the new metric FTC layer: the integral evaluation now cites thm:ftc-part2-closed-interval-2026a, naming the primitive explicitly and treating the degenerate case t=0 separately.
Proof
Throughout we use the coordinate bound ∣xi∣≤∣x∣ from the elementary properties of the Euclidean norm, and the following consequence of linearity of the integral: if 0≤r≤t≤T and g is bounded and measurable on [0,T], then ∫[0,t]g=∫[0,r]g+∫[r,t]g, because 1[0,t]=1[0,r]+1[r,t]−1{r} and the integral of g1{r} vanishes, the single point r having Lebesgue measure zero. Here 1D is the function equal to 1 on D and 0 elsewhere.
Part (a). Let y:[0,T]→Rn be continuous and fix i. For a natural number q put tk=kT/q for k∈{0,…,q} and define y(q):[0,T]→Rn by ys(q)=ytk for s∈[tk,tk+1) and k∈{0,…,q−1}, and yT(q)=yT.
a finite union of intersections of intervals with sets that belong to the trace Borel σ-algebra by hypothesis 1. Hence s↦fi(s,ys(q)) is measurable, and ∣fi(s,ys(q))∣≤∣f(s,ys(q))∣≤K by hypothesis 2.
The interval [0,T] is nonempty, since T>0, and compact by Closed Interval [a,b] is Compact in R, so the continuous map y is uniformly continuous on it. Every s∈[0,T] satisfies ∣s−u∣≤T/q for the point u∈{t0,…,tq} with ys(q)=yu, so ∣ys(q)−ys∣≤ω(T/q) where ω is a modulus of uniform continuity of y, and therefore ∣ys(q)−ys∣→0 as q→∞, uniformly in s. By hypothesis 3 and the coordinate bound,
so fi(s,ys(q)) converges to fi(s,ys) for every s∈[0,T]. All these functions are bounded in absolute value by K, so by measurability of bounded pointwise limits, s↦fi(s,ys) is measurable; it is bounded by K, hence integrable over [0,t] for every t.
Assuming inductively that x(j)∈C, part (a) shows that all these integrals exist. For 0≤r≤t≤T the i-th component of xt(j+1)−xr(j+1) is ∫[r,t]fi(s,xs(j))ds, so by the norm bound for vector-valued integrals and hypothesis 2,
the last integral being computed, when t>0, as a Riemann integral of a continuous integrand, which agrees with the Lebesgue integral by the compact-interval toolkit, and evaluated by the fundamental theorem of calculus, whose hypotheses hold on [0,t] because the function s↦KΛjsj+2/(j+2)! is continuous on [0,t] and differentiable at every point of (0,t) with derivative the integrand; when t=0 both sides vanish.
Consequently d∞(x(j+1),x(j))≤KΛjTj+1/(j+1)!. The series ∑j≥0KΛjTj+1/(j+1)! converges, its partial sums being bounded by KTeΛT, so for j<j′ the triangle inequality gives
d∞(x(j),x(j′))≤i=j∑j′−1(i+1)!KΛiTi+1,
a tail of a convergent series, which tends to 0 as j→∞. Thus (x(j)) is a Cauchy sequence in C and converges to some x∈C; in particular x is continuous.
Fix t∈[0,T] and i. By hypothesis 3, the coordinate bound and monotonicity,
Since also xt(j+1),i→xti, letting j→∞ in the recursion gives
xti=x0i+∫[0,t]fi(s,xs)ds.
At t=0 all integrals vanish, so the value of x at 0 is x0.
Part (b), uniqueness. Let x and x~ be continuous maps satisfying the integral equation with the same x0. The map u(t)=∣xt−x~t∣ is continuous, and u(0)=0. Subtracting the two equations componentwise and applying the norm bound and hypothesis 3,