TheoremBase

Proof

Let R\mathbb{R} denote the real numbers with the order and arithmetic of their ordered field structure, and write s<ts<t to mean s≤ts\le t and s≠ts\ne t. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon; we must produce δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ0<\delta such that all x,y∈Kx,y\in K with dX(x,y)<δd_X(x,y)<\delta satisfy dY(f(x),f(y))<εd_Y(f(x),f(y))<\varepsilon.

The degenerate case. If K=∅K=\varnothing, take δ=1\delta=1, which satisfies 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. There are no points x,y∈Kx,y\in K, so the required condition holds vacuously. Assume from now on that KK is nonempty.

A cover with no choices. By claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the element η=ε⋅2−1\eta=\varepsilon\cdot 2^{-1} satisfies 0<η0<\eta and η+η=ε\eta+\eta=\varepsilon. Let PP be the set of all pairs (x,r)(x,r) with x∈Kx\in K and r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} such that 0<r0<r and such that every z∈Kz\in K with dX(x,z)<r+rd_X(x,z)<r+r satisfies dY(f(z),f(x))<ηd_Y(f(z),f(x))<\eta. For p=(x,r)∈Pp=(x,r)\in P put Up=BdX(x,r)U_p=B_{d_X}(x,r), the open ball of radius rr about xx; this assignment is a family of subsets of XX indexed by PP, and each UpU_p lies in TdX\mathcal{T}_{d_X} by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open. Note that PP is specified outright by a condition, so no selection of a radius for each point is made.

This family is an open cover of KK in XX. Indeed, let x∈Kx\in K. By continuity of ff at xx relative to KK, applied with the tolerance η\eta, there is δ0∈R\delta_0\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ00<\delta_0 such that every z∈Kz\in K with dX(x,z)<δ0d_X(x,z)<\delta_0 satisfies dY(f(z),f(x))<ηd_Y(f(z),f(x))<\eta. Put r=δ0⋅2−1r=\delta_0\cdot 2^{-1}; by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we have 0<r0<r and r+r=δ0r+r=\delta_0, so (x,r)∈P(x,r)\in P. Moreover dX(x,x)=0<rd_X(x,x)=0<r by condition 2 of the definition of a metric, so x∈U(x,r)x\in U_{(x,r)}.

Extracting a radius. Since KK is compact in (X,TdX)(X,\mathcal{T}_{d_X}), the implication from condition 1 to condition 2 of Compact Subset Criterion via Open Covers in the Ambient Space gives a finite subset J⊆PJ\subseteq P with KK contained in the union of the sets UpU_p for p∈Jp\in J. As KK is nonempty, some point of KK lies in some UpU_p with p∈Jp\in J, so JJ is nonempty. Hence JJ has nn elements for some natural number nn; fix a bijection from the initial segment [n][n] onto JJ and write (xk,rk)(x_k,r_k) for the image of k∈[n]k\in[n], so that JJ consists exactly of the pairs (xk,rk)(x_k,r_k) with k∈[n]k\in[n].

Let cc be the nn-tuple in R\mathbb{R} with components ck=−rkc_k=-r_k. By Greatest Element of a Finite Family in a Totally Ordered Set, applied to R\mathbb{R} with its total order, there is j∈[n]j\in[n] with ck≤cjc_k\le c_j for every k∈[n]k\in[n], that is −rk≤−rj-r_k\le -r_j; by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field this says rj≤rkr_j\le r_k for every k∈[n]k\in[n]. Put δ=rj\delta=r_j, so 0<δ0<\delta because (xj,rj)∈P(x_j,r_j)\in P.

The estimate. Let x,y∈Kx,y\in K satisfy dX(x,y)<δd_X(x,y)<\delta. Since the sets UpU_p with p∈Jp\in J cover KK, there is k∈[n]k\in[n] with x∈BdX(xk,rk)x\in B_{d_X}(x_k,r_k), that is dX(xk,x)<rkd_X(x_k,x)<r_k.

First, 0<rk0<r_k gives rk+0<rk+rkr_k+0<r_k+r_k by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so rk<rk+rkr_k<r_k+r_k; with dX(xk,x)<rkd_X(x_k,x)<r_k and claim 2 of that lemma we get dX(xk,x)<rk+rkd_X(x_k,x)<r_k+r_k. Since x∈Kx\in K and (xk,rk)∈P(x_k,r_k)\in P, this yields dY(f(x),f(xk))<ηd_Y(f(x),f(x_k))<\eta.

Next, dX(x,y)<δ=rjd_X(x,y)<\delta=r_j and rj≤rkr_j\le r_k give dX(x,y)<rkd_X(x,y)<r_k by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, hence in particular dX(x,y)≤rkd_X(x,y)\le r_k. Combining with dX(xk,x)<rkd_X(x_k,x)<r_k by claim 3 of that lemma gives dX(xk,x)+dX(x,y)<rk+rkd_X(x_k,x)+d_X(x,y)<r_k+r_k, and condition 4 of the definition of a metric gives dX(xk,y)≤dX(xk,x)+dX(x,y)d_X(x_k,y)\le d_X(x_k,x)+d_X(x,y); so dX(xk,y)<rk+rkd_X(x_k,y)<r_k+r_k by claim 2. Since y∈Ky\in K and (xk,rk)∈P(x_k,r_k)\in P, this yields dY(f(y),f(xk))<ηd_Y(f(y),f(x_k))<\eta.

Finally, condition 4 of the definition of a metric gives

dY(f(x),f(y))≤dY(f(x),f(xk))+dY(f(xk),f(y)),d_Y(f(x),f(y))\le d_Y(f(x),f(x_k))+d_Y(f(x_k),f(y)),

and dY(f(xk),f(y))=dY(f(y),f(xk))<ηd_Y(f(x_k),f(y))=d_Y(f(y),f(x_k))<\eta by condition 3 of that definition. From dY(f(x),f(xk))<ηd_Y(f(x),f(x_k))<\eta and dY(f(xk),f(y))≤ηd_Y(f(x_k),f(y))\le\eta, claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives dY(f(x),f(xk))+dY(f(xk),f(y))<η+η=εd_Y(f(x),f(x_k))+d_Y(f(x_k),f(y))<\eta+\eta=\varepsilon, and claim 2 of that lemma gives dY(f(x),f(y))<εd_Y(f(x),f(y))<\varepsilon.

Since ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number, ff is uniformly continuous on KK.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…