Proof of Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely
lemmalem:dense-subspace-extension-complex-hilbert-2026aA map on the dense subspace is extended by taking limits along approximating sequences; the bound makes the image sequences Cauchy, the limit is independent of the sequence, and algebraic identities, bounds and isometry pass to the limit. Uniqueness follows from sequential continuity, and the equality criterion from continuity of the inner product together with that uniqueness.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Norms and inner products are those of or of , as the vectors require, and convergence in and refers to the norm metrics, as fixed in Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation §spaces. By claim 2 of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric the induced norm is a norm in the sense of Norm on a Complex Vector Space, and its positivity, absolute homogeneity and triangle inequality are used without further mention; in particular and , where .
Preliminaries. (P1) Let and converge to and in (or in ), and let . Then converges to and converges to . Indeed and . Given it therefore suffices to take so large that and are below both and .
(P2) Since is dense, by Dense Subset of a Topological Space. So by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space every has an approximating sequence, that is, a sequence in converging to . For the constant sequence is one. Let and approximate and , and let . Then approximates and approximates , by (P1) and because is a linear subspace.
(P3) Let be real, and let satisfy and for all . Then . Given , the choice therefore meets Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, and is continuous on . In particular every is continuous on : take , which is a bound by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound.
A common construction for clauses 1 and 2. Let be either the identity or complex conjugation. Let satisfy , and for all and . In both cases and , by claims 1 and 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Hence for .
(A) Convergence. Let approximate . Given , choose with for . For ,
So is a Cauchy sequence in . It converges because is complete (Complex Hilbert Space).
(B) Independence of the sequence. Let and both approximate , with and . Since , for every
Given , each term on the right is below for large. So for every . Hence by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §vanishing, and .
Define to be this common limit. This gives the following property (F): for every approximating sequence of . Moreover for : use the constant sequence, and recall that limits are unique by Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space.
(C) Algebra. Let and approximate , and let . By (P2) and (F), and . By (P1) and (F), and . By Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space, and . In particular .
(D) Bounds. Let be real with for every . Let , with approximating sequence . For every ,
Given , the first two terms on the right are each below for large. So for every , and by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above. With this gives on .
Suppose moreover that on . Then gives . Conversely, for every ,
which gives in the same way. So .
(E) Continuity and uniqueness. By (C), (D) and (P3), is continuous on . Let be any map that is continuous on and satisfies for . Let , with approximating sequence . Then Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential, applied with , gives , while by (F). So by Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space, that is, .
Proof of clause 1 (Linear maps). Take to be the identity and ; the hypotheses hold because is linear with bound , and set . By (C), is linear. By (D), is a bound for it, so by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded, and by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound. By (F), for . By (D), is isometric when is. For uniqueness, let agree with on . Then is continuous on by (P3), so by (E).
Proof of clause 2 (Conjugate-linear maps). Take to be complex conjugation and , and set . By (E), is continuous and is the only continuous map that agrees with on ; it does agree with on by (F). Additivity and hold by (C). The bound, and the isometry when is isometric, hold by (D).
Proof of clause 3 (Equality of operators). First let and put . For , conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space give . Since is dense in , Dense Subset of a Topological Space and Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space give a sequence in converging to . Now , so claim 1 of Elementary Properties of a Complex Inner Product and claim 1 of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric give, for every ,
Given , the right-hand side is below for large. Since is real and nonnegative, it equals by claim 8 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Hence for every , so by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §vanishing, and by condition 4 of Complex Inner Product Space. Thus for every .
The restriction of to is a linear map with bound (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound). Both and are elements of agreeing with it on , so by the uniqueness in clause 1. The same argument proves the final sentence of the clause, whose hypothesis is exactly the agreement on used here.
Loading…
Prerequisites
be5306c7-f50b-4026-baba-1c4ca54a413a