TheoremBase

The heat average of the score is a gradient field of the smoothed entropy with tangent classes: differentiability along couplings follows from a pointwise Taylor expansion of s log s and of the heat kernel together with periodic integration by parts, joint continuity from uniform convergence of the smoothed scores, and the divergence identity gives the Laplacian as minus the Fisher information.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Fix ss with 0<s≤120<s\le\tfrac12, write Θ=Θs\Theta=\Theta_{s} and pμ=pμsp_{\mu}=p^{s}_{\mu} for μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), and let cs,Csc_{s},C_{s} be the constants of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity and LsL_{s} that of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz. As in Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average, ∫Qf dλd\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} stands for ∫1Qf dλd\int\mathbf{1}_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d}; since λd(Q)=1\lambda_{d}(Q)=1 by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §cell, ∣∫Qf dλd∣≤M|\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d}|\le M whenever ff is Borel with ∣f∣≤M|f|\le M on QQ. For continuous periodic ff this integral equals the torus integral ∫Tdf dx\int_{\mathbb{T}^{d}}f\,dx of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure, by Zero Extension of a Real-Valued Function, and the Unit-Cell Integral of a Continuous Function §extension.

Step 0 (Kernel and density estimates). Let Ψ\Psi be one of Θ,∂1Θ,…,∂dΘ\Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta. By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity and Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative, Ψ\Psi is Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d}-periodic and of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, ∣Ψ∣≤Cs|\Psi|\le C_{s}, and all first partial derivatives of Ψ\Psi are bounded by CsC_{s} in absolute value; so the Lipschitz bound (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder gives

∣Ψ(u)−Ψ(u′)∣≤d Cs ∥u−u′∥(u,u′∈Rd).(0.1)|\Psi(u)-\Psi(u')|\le\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}\,\lVert u-u'\rVert\qquad(u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.1}

For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density gives pμ∈Cper2p_{\mu}\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}, cs≤pμ≤Csc_{s}\le p_{\mu}\le C_{s} and ∣∂kpμ(y)∣=∣∫∂kΘ(y−x) μ(dx)∣≤Cs|\partial_{k}p_{\mu}(y)|=|\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x)\,\mu(dx)|\le C_{s}; it also shows that Ssμ∈PI(Td)S_{s}\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and that ξSsμ\xi_{S_{s}\mu} is the class of ζμ=pμ−1∇pμ\zeta_{\mu}=p_{\mu}^{-1}\nabla p_{\mu}. The components of ζμ\zeta_{\mu} are continuous and periodic with ∣ζμ,k∣≤Cs/cs|\zeta_{\mu,k}|\le C_{s}/c_{s}, so ζμ\zeta_{\mu} is Borel with ∫∥ζμ∥2 d(Ssμ)<∞\int\lVert\zeta_{\mu}\rVert^{2}\,d(S_{s}\mu)<\infty.

Step 1 (The candidate field; condition (a) and tangency). For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} put g(μ,x)=AsμξSsμ(x)=∫Qζμ(y) Θ(y−x) λd(dy)g(\mu,x)=A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu}(x)=\int_{Q}\zeta_{\mu}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy); by Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average (with F=ζμF=\zeta_{\mu}) this does not depend on the representative, so gg is the map (μ,x)↦AsμξSsμ(x)(\mu,x)\mapsto A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu}(x) of the statement. By the same clause each gi(μ,⋅)g_{i}(\mu,\cdot) belongs to Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, which is condition (a) of a gradient field, and for all xx and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d]

gi(μ,x)=∫Qζμ,i(y) Θ(y−x) λd(dy),∂jgi(μ,x)=−∫Qζμ,i(y) ∂jΘ(y−x) λd(dy).(1.1)g_{i}(\mu,x)=\int_{Q}\zeta_{\mu,i}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy),\qquad\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x)=-\int_{Q}\zeta_{\mu,i}(y)\,\partial_{j}\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy).\tag{1.1}

The score ξSsμ\xi_{S_{s}\mu} lies in TSsμT_{S_{s}\mu} by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score, so Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §tangent shows that the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot) in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) lies in TμT_{\mu}.

Step 2 (The logarithm of the density). Fix μ\mu and write p=pμp=p_{\mu}, ζ=ζμ\zeta=\zeta_{\mu}. The function log⁡p\log p is Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d}-periodic because pp is. For y∈Rdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and k∈[d]k\in[d], the map t↦p(y+tek)t\mapsto p(y+te_{k}) is differentiable at 00 with derivative ∂kp(y)\partial_{k}p(y) and takes values in (0,∞)(0,\infty), where log⁡\log is differentiable with log⁡′(t)=1/t\log'(t)=1/t by The Natural Logarithm; so the chain rule Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives gives ∂k(log⁡p)(y)=∂kp(y)/p(y)=ζk(y)\partial_{k}(\log p)(y)=\partial_{k}p(y)/p(y)=\zeta_{k}(y). Since ∂kp\partial_{k}p and pp are of class C1C^{1} (Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative) and pp does not vanish, ζk\zeta_{k} is of class C1C^{1}, in particular continuous, by claim (ii) of Products and Quotients of C^k Real-Valued Maps on Euclidean Open Sets Are C^k. Hence log⁡p∈Cper1\log p\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, and log⁡p\log p is bounded by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §bounded; fix B≥0B\ge0 with ∣log⁡p∣≤B|\log p|\le B. For x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} the map y↦Θ(y−x)y\mapsto\Theta(y-x) lies in Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} with partial derivatives y↦∂kΘ(y−x)y\mapsto\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x) (partial derivatives commute with translations, directly from their definition). The integration by parts formula Vanishing Mean of a Derivative and Integration by Parts on the Torus §parts, applied to these two functions, and (1.1) give, for all x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and k∈[d]k\in[d],

∫Qlog⁡p(y) ∂kΘ(y−x) λd(dy)=−∫Qζk(y) Θ(y−x) λd(dy)=−gk(μ,x).(2.1)\int_{Q}\log p(y)\,\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy)=-\int_{Q}\zeta_{k}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy)=-g_{k}(\mu,x).\tag{2.1}

Step 3 (Condition (b): differentiability along couplings). Keep μ\mu, pp, ζ\zeta and BB from Step 2 and put K=Ls2/cs+12B d CsK=L_{s}^{2}/c_{s}+\tfrac12 B\,d\,C_{s}. We first show that for every ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and every γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu)

∣Ent(Ssν)−Ent(Ssμ)−JT(g(μ,⋅),γ)∣≤K IT(γ).(3.1)\bigl|\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\nu)-\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma)\bigr|\le K\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma).\tag{3.1}

Let q=pνq=p_{\nu}.

(i) Entropy as a cell integral. By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density, 1Qp\mathbf{1}_{Q}p is a density of SsμS_{s}\mu; since the function ϕ\phi of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm vanishes at 00, ϕ∘(1Qp)=1Q plog⁡p\phi\circ(\mathbf{1}_{Q}p)=\mathbf{1}_{Q}\,p\log p, which is Borel and bounded, hence integrable. By The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy (the entropy may be computed with any density), Ent(Ssμ)=∫Qplog⁡p dλd\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\mu)=\int_{Q}p\log p\,d\lambda_{d}, and likewise Ent(Ssν)=∫Qqlog⁡q dλd\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\nu)=\int_{Q}q\log q\,d\lambda_{d}. Moreover ∫Qp dλd=Ssμ(Rd)=1=∫Qq dλd\int_{Q}p\,d\lambda_{d}=S_{s}\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1=\int_{Q}q\,d\lambda_{d}, by the density property.

(ii) Expansion of tlog⁡tt\log t. For y∈Rdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d} put R(y)=qlog⁡q−plog⁡p−(1+log⁡p)(q−p)R(y)=q\log q-p\log p-(1+\log p)(q-p), all functions evaluated at yy. Using log⁡q=log⁡(q/p)+log⁡p\log q=\log(q/p)+\log p (The Natural Logarithm), R=qlog⁡(q/p)−q+pR=q\log(q/p)-q+p. The bounds 1−t−1≤log⁡t≤t−11-t^{-1}\le\log t\le t-1 of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §log with t=q/pt=q/p give q−p≤qlog⁡(q/p)≤q(q−p)/pq-p\le q\log(q/p)\le q(q-p)/p, hence 0≤R≤(q−p)2/p≤(q−p)2/cs0\le R\le(q-p)^{2}/p\le(q-p)^{2}/c_{s}. By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz and Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance, ∣q(y)−p(y)∣≤LsWT(μ,ν)≤LsIT(γ)|q(y)-p(y)|\le L_{s}W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\le L_{s}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}, so 0≤∫QR dλd≤Ls2IT(γ)/cs0\le\int_{Q}R\,d\lambda_{d}\le L_{s}^{2}I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)/c_{s}. By (i), ∫Q(q−p) dλd=0\int_{Q}(q-p)\,d\lambda_{d}=0, so

Ent(Ssν)−Ent(Ssμ)=∫Qlog⁡p (q−p) dλd+∫QR dλd.(3.2)\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\nu)-\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\mu)=\int_{Q}\log p\,(q-p)\,d\lambda_{d}+\int_{Q}R\,d\lambda_{d}.\tag{3.2}

(iii) Expansion of the kernel. Let y∈Rdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and w∈Rd+dw\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, and put x=pr1(w)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w), x′=pr2(w)x'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w), v=ϖ(x′−x)v=\varpi(x'-x). By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range, x′−x−v∈Zdx'-x-v\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}, so Θ(y−x′)=Θ(y−x−v)\Theta(y-x')=\Theta(y-x-v) by periodicity; and ∥v∥=dT(x,x′)\lVert v\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x') by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance. The first-order remainder bound (ii) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder, applied to Θ\Theta on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} between y−xy-x and y−x−vy-x-v with M2=CsM_{2}=C_{s} (The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity), gives

E(y,w):=Θ(y−x′)−Θ(y−x)+∇Θ(y−x)⋅v,∣E(y,w)∣≤12 d Cs dT(x,x′)2.E(y,w):=\Theta(y-x')-\Theta(y-x)+\nabla\Theta(y-x)\cdot v,\qquad|E(y,w)|\le\tfrac12\,d\,C_{s}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x')^{2}.

Since (pr1)#γ=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma=\mu and (pr2)#γ=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma=\nu (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling), the change-of-variables formula gives p(y)=∫Θ(y−pr1(w)) γ(dw)p(y)=\int\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw) and q(y)=∫Θ(y−pr2(w)) γ(dw)q(y)=\int\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\,\gamma(dw), the integrands being bounded and Borel (ϖ\varpi is Borel by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz). Hence

q(y)−p(y)=−∑k=1d∫∂kΘ(y−pr1(w)) ϖk(pr2(w)−pr1(w)) γ(dw)+ρ(y),ρ(y)=∫E(y,w) γ(dw),q(y)-p(y)=-\sum_{k=1}^{d}\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)+\rho(y),\qquad\rho(y)=\int E(y,w)\,\gamma(dw),

with ∣ρ(y)∣≤12 d Cs IT(γ)|\rho(y)|\le\tfrac12\,d\,C_{s}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost. In particular ∣∫Qlog⁡p ρ dλd∣≤12B d Cs IT(γ)|\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}|\le\tfrac12 B\,d\,C_{s}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma).

(iv) The first-order term. Let UU be the measure with density 1Q\mathbf{1}_{Q} with respect to λd\lambda_{d} (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables); it is a probability measure since λd(Q)=1\lambda_{d}(Q)=1, and ∫f dU=∫Qf dλd\int f\,dU=\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} for bounded Borel ff by the same claim. For k∈[d]k\in[d] let Φk(y,w)=log⁡p(y) ∂kΘ(y−pr1(w)) ϖk(pr2(w)−pr1(w))\Phi_{k}(y,w)=\log p(y)\,\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)) on Rd×Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d}\times\mathbb{R}^{d+d}. It is bounded (by B CsdB\,C_{s}\sqrt{d}, using The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range) and is the composite of a Borel map on Rd+(d+d)\mathbb{R}^{d+(d+d)} with the concatenation map, hence measurable for the product σ\sigma-algebra by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product (applied to its positive and negative parts); so it is integrable with respect to the probability measure U⊗γU\otimes\gamma. Fubini's theorem (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems) and then (2.1) give

∫Qlog⁡p(y)(∫∂kΘ(y−pr1(w)) ϖk(pr2(w)−pr1(w)) γ(dw))λd(dy)=∫(∫Qlog⁡p(y) ∂kΘ(y−pr1(w)) λd(dy))ϖk(pr2(w)−pr1(w)) γ(dw)=−∫gk(μ,pr1(w)) ϖk(pr2(w)−pr1(w)) γ(dw),\int_{Q}\log p(y)\Bigl(\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)\Bigr)\lambda_{d}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int_{Q}\log p(y)\,\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\lambda_{d}(dy)\Bigr)\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)=-\int g_{k}(\mu,\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw),

where the left side is ∫(∫Φk(y,w) γ(dw))U(dy)\int\bigl(\int\Phi_{k}(y,w)\,\gamma(dw)\bigr)U(dy) and the middle is ∫(∫Φk(y,w) U(dy))γ(dw)\int\bigl(\int\Phi_{k}(y,w)\,U(dy)\bigr)\gamma(dw); every section of the bounded function Φk\Phi_{k} is integrable, so no exceptional null set arises. Multiplying the expansion of (iii) by log⁡p(y)\log p(y), integrating over QQ and summing over kk, by The Torus Displacement Pairing of a Vector Field Along a Coupling §pairing,

∫Qlog⁡p (q−p) dλd=∑k=1d∫gk(μ,pr1(w)) ϖk(pr2(w)−pr1(w)) γ(dw)+∫Qlog⁡p ρ dλd=JT(g(μ,⋅),γ)+∫Qlog⁡p ρ dλd.\int_{Q}\log p\,(q-p)\,d\lambda_{d}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\int g_{k}(\mu,\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)+\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}=\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma)+\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}.

(v) Conclusion of (3.1). By (3.2), (iv), (ii) and (iii), the left side of (3.1) is at most ∫QR dλd+∣∫Qlog⁡p ρ dλd∣≤Ls2IT(γ)/cs+12B d Cs IT(γ)=K IT(γ)\int_{Q}R\,d\lambda_{d}+|\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}|\le L_{s}^{2}I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)/c_{s}+\tfrac12 B\,d\,C_{s}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)=K\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma).

Now let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and put θ=ε/(K+1)>0\theta=\varepsilon/(K+1)>0. If ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) satisfy IT(γ)<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2}, then by (3.1) the defect is at most KIT(γ) IT(γ)≤KθIT(γ)≤εIT(γ)K\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\,\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\le K\theta\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}. By Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §differentiable, Ent∘Ss\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s} (real-valued by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §calculus) is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot), and by the uniqueness in Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient, ∇(Ent∘Ss)(μ)\nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s})(\mu) is the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot), that is AsμξSsμA^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu}. This is condition (b) of a gradient field.

Step 4 (Condition (c): joint continuity). Let (μn)(\mu_{n}) converge to μ\mu in (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) and (xn)(x_{n}) converge to xx in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}; write pn=pμnp_{n}=p_{\mu_{n}}, p=pμp=p_{\mu}, ζn=ζμn\zeta^{n}=\zeta_{\mu_{n}}, ζ=ζμ\zeta=\zeta_{\mu}. For i∈[d]i\in[d] and y∈Rdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d},

ζin(y)−ζi(y)=∂ipn(y)−∂ip(y)pn(y)+∂ip(y) p(y)−pn(y)pn(y) p(y),\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)-\zeta_{i}(y)=\frac{\partial_{i}p_{n}(y)-\partial_{i}p(y)}{p_{n}(y)}+\partial_{i}p(y)\,\frac{p(y)-p_{n}(y)}{p_{n}(y)\,p(y)},

so by Step 0 and both inequalities of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz, sup⁡y∣ζin(y)−ζi(y)∣≤εn:=(Ls/cs+CsLs/cs2) WT(μn,μ)\sup_{y}|\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)-\zeta_{i}(y)|\le\varepsilon_{n}:=(L_{s}/c_{s}+C_{s}L_{s}/c_{s}^{2})\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu). Let Ψ∈{Θ,∂1Θ,…,∂dΘ}\Psi\in\{\Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta\}. Splitting ζin(y)Ψ(y−xn)−ζi(y)Ψ(y−x)=(ζin(y)−ζi(y))Ψ(y−xn)+ζi(y)(Ψ(y−xn)−Ψ(y−x))\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x_{n})-\zeta_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x)=(\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)-\zeta_{i}(y))\Psi(y-x_{n})+\zeta_{i}(y)(\Psi(y-x_{n})-\Psi(y-x)) and using ∣Ψ∣≤Cs|\Psi|\le C_{s}, ∣ζi∣≤Cs/cs|\zeta_{i}|\le C_{s}/c_{s} and (0.1),

∣∫Qζin(y)Ψ(y−xn) λd(dy)−∫Qζi(y)Ψ(y−x) λd(dy)∣≤Cs εn+d Cs2cs ∥xn−x∥⟶0,\Bigl|\int_{Q}\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x_{n})\,\lambda_{d}(dy)-\int_{Q}\zeta_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy)\Bigr|\le C_{s}\,\varepsilon_{n}+\frac{\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}^{2}}{c_{s}}\,\lVert x_{n}-x\rVert\longrightarrow0,

since WT(μn,μ)→0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 and ∥xn−x∥→0\lVert x_{n}-x\rVert\to0. With Ψ=Θ\Psi=\Theta and with Ψ=∂jΘ\Psi=\partial_{j}\Theta, (1.1) turns this into gi(μn,xn)→gi(μ,x)g_{i}(\mu_{n},x_{n})\to g_{i}(\mu,x) and ∂jgi(μn,xn)→∂jgi(μ,x)\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu_{n},x_{n})\to\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x), which is condition (c) of a gradient field.

Step 5 (Clause 1). By Steps 1, 3 and 4, gg is a gradient field of Ent∘Ss\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s}, and by Step 1 the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot) lies in TμT_{\mu} for every μ\mu. By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §criterion, Ent∘Ss\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s} is a Laplacian test function; by Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §unique its gradient field is gg; and Step 3 gives ∇(Ent∘Ss)(μ)=AsμξSsμ\nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s})(\mu)=A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu}.

Step 6 (Clause 2). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). By The Laplacian of a Laplacian Test Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space §laplacian and Step 5, L(Ent∘Ss)(μ)=∫∑i=1d∂igi(μ,x) μ(dx)\mathcal{L}(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s})(\mu)=\int\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,x)\,\mu(dx). Since g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot) is the heat average of F=ζμF=\zeta_{\mu}, Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §divergence gives ∫∑i∂igi(μ,⋅) dμ=−⟨ξSsμ,ξSsμ⟩Ssμ=−∥ξSsμ∥Ssμ2\int\sum_{i}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,\cdot)\,d\mu=-\langle\xi_{S_{s}\mu},\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rangle_{S_{s}\mu}=-\lVert\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rVert_{S_{s}\mu}^{2}, which is −I(Ssμ)-\mathcal{I}(S_{s}\mu) by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…