Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Fix s s s with 0 < s ≤ 1 2 0<s\le\tfrac12 0 < s ≤ 2 1 , write Θ = Θ s \Theta=\Theta_{s} Θ = Θ s and p μ = p μ s p_{\mu}=p^{s}_{\mu} p μ = p μ s for μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , and let c s , C s c_{s},C_{s} c s , C s be the constants of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity and L s L_{s} L s that of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz . As in Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average , ∫ Q f d λ d \int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} ∫ Q f d λ d stands for ∫ 1 Q f d λ d \int\mathbf{1}_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} ∫ 1 Q f d λ d ; since λ d ( Q ) = 1 \lambda_{d}(Q)=1 λ d ( Q ) = 1 by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §cell , ∣ ∫ Q f d λ d ∣ ≤ M |\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d}|\le M ∣ ∫ Q f d λ d ∣ ≤ M whenever f f f is Borel with ∣ f ∣ ≤ M |f|\le M ∣ f ∣ ≤ M on Q Q Q . For continuous periodic f f f this integral equals the torus integral ∫ T d f d x \int_{\mathbb{T}^{d}}f\,dx ∫ T d f d x of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure , by Zero Extension of a Real-Valued Function, and the Unit-Cell Integral of a Continuous Function §extension .
Step 0 (Kernel and density estimates). Let Ψ \Psi Ψ be one of Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ \Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ . By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity and Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative , Ψ \Psi Ψ is Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d -periodic and of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , ∣ Ψ ∣ ≤ C s |\Psi|\le C_{s} ∣Ψ∣ ≤ C s , and all first partial derivatives of Ψ \Psi Ψ are bounded by C s C_{s} C s in absolute value; so the Lipschitz bound (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder gives
∣ Ψ ( u ) − Ψ ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ d C s ∥ u − u ′ ∥ ( u , u ′ ∈ R d ) . (0.1) |\Psi(u)-\Psi(u')|\le\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}\,\lVert u-u'\rVert\qquad(u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.1} ∣Ψ ( u ) − Ψ ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ d C s ∥ u − u ′ ∥ ( u , u ′ ∈ R d ) . ( 0.1 )
For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density gives p μ ∈ C p e r 2 p_{\mu}\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} p μ ∈ C per 2 , c s ≤ p μ ≤ C s c_{s}\le p_{\mu}\le C_{s} c s ≤ p μ ≤ C s and ∣ ∂ k p μ ( y ) ∣ = ∣ ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) μ ( d x ) ∣ ≤ C s |\partial_{k}p_{\mu}(y)|=|\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x)\,\mu(dx)|\le C_{s} ∣ ∂ k p μ ( y ) ∣ = ∣ ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) μ ( d x ) ∣ ≤ C s ; it also shows that S s μ ∈ P I ( T d ) S_{s}\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) S s μ ∈ P I ( T d ) and that ξ S s μ \xi_{S_{s}\mu} ξ S s μ is the class of ζ μ = p μ − 1 ∇ p μ \zeta_{\mu}=p_{\mu}^{-1}\nabla p_{\mu} ζ μ = p μ − 1 ∇ p μ . The components of ζ μ \zeta_{\mu} ζ μ are continuous and periodic with ∣ ζ μ , k ∣ ≤ C s / c s |\zeta_{\mu,k}|\le C_{s}/c_{s} ∣ ζ μ , k ∣ ≤ C s / c s , so ζ μ \zeta_{\mu} ζ μ is Borel with ∫ ∥ ζ μ ∥ 2 d ( S s μ ) < ∞ \int\lVert\zeta_{\mu}\rVert^{2}\,d(S_{s}\mu)<\infty ∫ ∥ ζ μ ∥ 2 d ( S s μ ) < ∞ .
Step 1 (The candidate field; condition (a) and tangency). For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) and x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d put g ( μ , x ) = A s μ ξ S s μ ( x ) = ∫ Q ζ μ ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) g(\mu,x)=A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu}(x)=\int_{Q}\zeta_{\mu}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy) g ( μ , x ) = A s μ ξ S s μ ( x ) = ∫ Q ζ μ ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) ; by Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average (with F = ζ μ F=\zeta_{\mu} F = ζ μ ) this does not depend on the representative, so g g g is the map ( μ , x ) ↦ A s μ ξ S s μ ( x ) (\mu,x)\mapsto A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu}(x) ( μ , x ) ↦ A s μ ξ S s μ ( x ) of the statement. By the same clause each g i ( μ , ⋅ ) g_{i}(\mu,\cdot) g i ( μ , ⋅ ) belongs to C p e r 1 C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} C per 1 , which is condition (a) of a gradient field , and for all x x x and i , j ∈ [ d ] i,j\in[d] i , j ∈ [ d ]
g i ( μ , x ) = ∫ Q ζ μ , i ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) , ∂ j g i ( μ , x ) = − ∫ Q ζ μ , i ( y ) ∂ j Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) . (1.1) g_{i}(\mu,x)=\int_{Q}\zeta_{\mu,i}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy),\qquad\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x)=-\int_{Q}\zeta_{\mu,i}(y)\,\partial_{j}\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy).\tag{1.1} g i ( μ , x ) = ∫ Q ζ μ , i ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) , ∂ j g i ( μ , x ) = − ∫ Q ζ μ , i ( y ) ∂ j Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) . ( 1.1 )
The score ξ S s μ \xi_{S_{s}\mu} ξ S s μ lies in T S s μ T_{S_{s}\mu} T S s μ by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score , so Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §tangent shows that the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) in L 2 ( μ ; R d ) L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ; R d ) lies in T μ T_{\mu} T μ .
Step 2 (The logarithm of the density). Fix μ \mu μ and write p = p μ p=p_{\mu} p = p μ , ζ = ζ μ \zeta=\zeta_{\mu} ζ = ζ μ . The function log p \log p log p is Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d -periodic because p p p is. For y ∈ R d y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y ∈ R d and k ∈ [ d ] k\in[d] k ∈ [ d ] , the map t ↦ p ( y + t e k ) t\mapsto p(y+te_{k}) t ↦ p ( y + t e k ) is differentiable at 0 0 0 with derivative ∂ k p ( y ) \partial_{k}p(y) ∂ k p ( y ) and takes values in ( 0 , ∞ ) (0,\infty) ( 0 , ∞ ) , where log \log log is differentiable with log ′ ( t ) = 1 / t \log'(t)=1/t log ′ ( t ) = 1/ t by The Natural Logarithm ; so the chain rule Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives gives ∂ k ( log p ) ( y ) = ∂ k p ( y ) / p ( y ) = ζ k ( y ) \partial_{k}(\log p)(y)=\partial_{k}p(y)/p(y)=\zeta_{k}(y) ∂ k ( log p ) ( y ) = ∂ k p ( y ) / p ( y ) = ζ k ( y ) . Since ∂ k p \partial_{k}p ∂ k p and p p p are of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 (Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative ) and p p p does not vanish, ζ k \zeta_{k} ζ k is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , in particular continuous, by claim (ii) of Products and Quotients of C^k Real-Valued Maps on Euclidean Open Sets Are C^k . Hence log p ∈ C p e r 1 \log p\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} log p ∈ C per 1 , and log p \log p log p is bounded by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §bounded ; fix B ≥ 0 B\ge0 B ≥ 0 with ∣ log p ∣ ≤ B |\log p|\le B ∣ log p ∣ ≤ B . For x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d the map y ↦ Θ ( y − x ) y\mapsto\Theta(y-x) y ↦ Θ ( y − x ) lies in C p e r 1 C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} C per 1 with partial derivatives y ↦ ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) y\mapsto\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x) y ↦ ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) (partial derivatives commute with translations, directly from their definition). The integration by parts formula Vanishing Mean of a Derivative and Integration by Parts on the Torus §parts , applied to these two functions, and (1.1) give, for all x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d and k ∈ [ d ] k\in[d] k ∈ [ d ] ,
∫ Q log p ( y ) ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) = − ∫ Q ζ k ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) = − g k ( μ , x ) . (2.1) \int_{Q}\log p(y)\,\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy)=-\int_{Q}\zeta_{k}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy)=-g_{k}(\mu,x).\tag{2.1} ∫ Q log p ( y ) ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) = − ∫ Q ζ k ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) = − g k ( μ , x ) . ( 2.1 )
Step 3 (Condition (b): differentiability along couplings). Keep μ \mu μ , p p p , ζ \zeta ζ and B B B from Step 2 and put K = L s 2 / c s + 1 2 B d C s K=L_{s}^{2}/c_{s}+\tfrac12 B\,d\,C_{s} K = L s 2 / c s + 2 1 B d C s . We first show that for every ν ∈ P ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P ( T d ) and every γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν )
∣ E n t ( S s ν ) − E n t ( S s μ ) − J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) ∣ ≤ K I T ( γ ) . (3.1) \bigl|\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\nu)-\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma)\bigr|\le K\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma).\tag{3.1} Ent ( S s ν ) − Ent ( S s μ ) − J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) ≤ K I T ( γ ) . ( 3.1 )
Let q = p ν q=p_{\nu} q = p ν .
(i) Entropy as a cell integral. By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density , 1 Q p \mathbf{1}_{Q}p 1 Q p is a density of S s μ S_{s}\mu S s μ ; since the function ϕ \phi ϕ of The Function s log s s\log s s log s : Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm vanishes at 0 0 0 , ϕ ∘ ( 1 Q p ) = 1 Q p log p \phi\circ(\mathbf{1}_{Q}p)=\mathbf{1}_{Q}\,p\log p ϕ ∘ ( 1 Q p ) = 1 Q p log p , which is Borel and bounded, hence integrable. By The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy (the entropy may be computed with any density), E n t ( S s μ ) = ∫ Q p log p d λ d \mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\mu)=\int_{Q}p\log p\,d\lambda_{d} Ent ( S s μ ) = ∫ Q p log p d λ d , and likewise E n t ( S s ν ) = ∫ Q q log q d λ d \mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\nu)=\int_{Q}q\log q\,d\lambda_{d} Ent ( S s ν ) = ∫ Q q log q d λ d . Moreover ∫ Q p d λ d = S s μ ( R d ) = 1 = ∫ Q q d λ d \int_{Q}p\,d\lambda_{d}=S_{s}\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1=\int_{Q}q\,d\lambda_{d} ∫ Q p d λ d = S s μ ( R d ) = 1 = ∫ Q q d λ d , by the density property.
(ii) Expansion of t log t t\log t t log t . For y ∈ R d y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y ∈ R d put R ( y ) = q log q − p log p − ( 1 + log p ) ( q − p ) R(y)=q\log q-p\log p-(1+\log p)(q-p) R ( y ) = q log q − p log p − ( 1 + log p ) ( q − p ) , all functions evaluated at y y y . Using log q = log ( q / p ) + log p \log q=\log(q/p)+\log p log q = log ( q / p ) + log p (The Natural Logarithm ), R = q log ( q / p ) − q + p R=q\log(q/p)-q+p R = q log ( q / p ) − q + p . The bounds 1 − t − 1 ≤ log t ≤ t − 1 1-t^{-1}\le\log t\le t-1 1 − t − 1 ≤ log t ≤ t − 1 of The Function s log s s\log s s log s : Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §log with t = q / p t=q/p t = q / p give q − p ≤ q log ( q / p ) ≤ q ( q − p ) / p q-p\le q\log(q/p)\le q(q-p)/p q − p ≤ q log ( q / p ) ≤ q ( q − p ) / p , hence 0 ≤ R ≤ ( q − p ) 2 / p ≤ ( q − p ) 2 / c s 0\le R\le(q-p)^{2}/p\le(q-p)^{2}/c_{s} 0 ≤ R ≤ ( q − p ) 2 / p ≤ ( q − p ) 2 / c s . By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz and Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance , ∣ q ( y ) − p ( y ) ∣ ≤ L s W T ( μ , ν ) ≤ L s I T ( γ ) |q(y)-p(y)|\le L_{s}W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\le L_{s}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)} ∣ q ( y ) − p ( y ) ∣ ≤ L s W T ( μ , ν ) ≤ L s I T ( γ ) , so 0 ≤ ∫ Q R d λ d ≤ L s 2 I T ( γ ) / c s 0\le\int_{Q}R\,d\lambda_{d}\le L_{s}^{2}I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)/c_{s} 0 ≤ ∫ Q R d λ d ≤ L s 2 I T ( γ ) / c s . By (i), ∫ Q ( q − p ) d λ d = 0 \int_{Q}(q-p)\,d\lambda_{d}=0 ∫ Q ( q − p ) d λ d = 0 , so
E n t ( S s ν ) − E n t ( S s μ ) = ∫ Q log p ( q − p ) d λ d + ∫ Q R d λ d . (3.2) \mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\nu)-\mathrm{Ent}(S_{s}\mu)=\int_{Q}\log p\,(q-p)\,d\lambda_{d}+\int_{Q}R\,d\lambda_{d}.\tag{3.2} Ent ( S s ν ) − Ent ( S s μ ) = ∫ Q log p ( q − p ) d λ d + ∫ Q R d λ d . ( 3.2 )
(iii) Expansion of the kernel. Let y ∈ R d y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y ∈ R d and w ∈ R d + d w\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d} w ∈ R d + d , and put x = p r 1 ( w ) x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w) x = pr 1 ( w ) , x ′ = p r 2 ( w ) x'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w) x ′ = pr 2 ( w ) , v = ϖ ( x ′ − x ) v=\varpi(x'-x) v = ϖ ( x ′ − x ) . By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , x ′ − x − v ∈ Z d x'-x-v\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} x ′ − x − v ∈ Z d , so Θ ( y − x ′ ) = Θ ( y − x − v ) \Theta(y-x')=\Theta(y-x-v) Θ ( y − x ′ ) = Θ ( y − x − v ) by periodicity; and ∥ v ∥ = d T ( x , x ′ ) \lVert v\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x') ∥ v ∥ = d T ( x , x ′ ) by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance . The first-order remainder bound (ii) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder , applied to Θ \Theta Θ on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d between y − x y-x y − x and y − x − v y-x-v y − x − v with M 2 = C s M_{2}=C_{s} M 2 = C s (The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity ), gives
E ( y , w ) : = Θ ( y − x ′ ) − Θ ( y − x ) + ∇ Θ ( y − x ) ⋅ v , ∣ E ( y , w ) ∣ ≤ 1 2 d C s d T ( x , x ′ ) 2 . E(y,w):=\Theta(y-x')-\Theta(y-x)+\nabla\Theta(y-x)\cdot v,\qquad|E(y,w)|\le\tfrac12\,d\,C_{s}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x')^{2}. E ( y , w ) := Θ ( y − x ′ ) − Θ ( y − x ) + ∇Θ ( y − x ) ⋅ v , ∣ E ( y , w ) ∣ ≤ 2 1 d C s d T ( x , x ′ ) 2 .
Since ( p r 1 ) # γ = μ (\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma=\mu ( pr 1 ) # γ = μ and ( p r 2 ) # γ = ν (\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma=\nu ( pr 2 ) # γ = ν (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling ), the change-of-variables formula gives p ( y ) = ∫ Θ ( y − p r 1 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) p(y)=\int\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw) p ( y ) = ∫ Θ ( y − pr 1 ( w )) γ ( d w ) and q ( y ) = ∫ Θ ( y − p r 2 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) q(y)=\int\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\,\gamma(dw) q ( y ) = ∫ Θ ( y − pr 2 ( w )) γ ( d w ) , the integrands being bounded and Borel (ϖ \varpi ϖ is Borel by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz ). Hence
q ( y ) − p ( y ) = − ∑ k = 1 d ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − p r 1 ( w ) ) ϖ k ( p r 2 ( w ) − p r 1 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) + ρ ( y ) , ρ ( y ) = ∫ E ( y , w ) γ ( d w ) , q(y)-p(y)=-\sum_{k=1}^{d}\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)+\rho(y),\qquad\rho(y)=\int E(y,w)\,\gamma(dw), q ( y ) − p ( y ) = − k = 1 ∑ d ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − pr 1 ( w )) ϖ k ( pr 2 ( w ) − pr 1 ( w )) γ ( d w ) + ρ ( y ) , ρ ( y ) = ∫ E ( y , w ) γ ( d w ) ,
with ∣ ρ ( y ) ∣ ≤ 1 2 d C s I T ( γ ) |\rho(y)|\le\tfrac12\,d\,C_{s}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma) ∣ ρ ( y ) ∣ ≤ 2 1 d C s I T ( γ ) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost . In particular ∣ ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d ∣ ≤ 1 2 B d C s I T ( γ ) |\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}|\le\tfrac12 B\,d\,C_{s}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma) ∣ ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d ∣ ≤ 2 1 B d C s I T ( γ ) .
(iv) The first-order term. Let U U U be the measure with density 1 Q \mathbf{1}_{Q} 1 Q with respect to λ d \lambda_{d} λ d (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables ); it is a probability measure since λ d ( Q ) = 1 \lambda_{d}(Q)=1 λ d ( Q ) = 1 , and ∫ f d U = ∫ Q f d λ d \int f\,dU=\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} ∫ f d U = ∫ Q f d λ d for bounded Borel f f f by the same claim. For k ∈ [ d ] k\in[d] k ∈ [ d ] let Φ k ( y , w ) = log p ( y ) ∂ k Θ ( y − p r 1 ( w ) ) ϖ k ( p r 2 ( w ) − p r 1 ( w ) ) \Phi_{k}(y,w)=\log p(y)\,\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)) Φ k ( y , w ) = log p ( y ) ∂ k Θ ( y − pr 1 ( w )) ϖ k ( pr 2 ( w ) − pr 1 ( w )) on R d × R d + d \mathbb{R}^{d}\times\mathbb{R}^{d+d} R d × R d + d . It is bounded (by B C s d B\,C_{s}\sqrt{d} B C s d , using The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range ) and is the composite of a Borel map on R d + ( d + d ) \mathbb{R}^{d+(d+d)} R d + ( d + d ) with the concatenation map, hence measurable for the product σ \sigma σ -algebra by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product (applied to its positive and negative parts); so it is integrable with respect to the probability measure U ⊗ γ U\otimes\gamma U ⊗ γ . Fubini's theorem (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems ) and then (2.1) give
∫ Q log p ( y ) ( ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − p r 1 ( w ) ) ϖ k ( p r 2 ( w ) − p r 1 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) ) λ d ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ Q log p ( y ) ∂ k Θ ( y − p r 1 ( w ) ) λ d ( d y ) ) ϖ k ( p r 2 ( w ) − p r 1 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) = − ∫ g k ( μ , p r 1 ( w ) ) ϖ k ( p r 2 ( w ) − p r 1 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) , \int_{Q}\log p(y)\Bigl(\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)\Bigr)\lambda_{d}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int_{Q}\log p(y)\,\partial_{k}\Theta(y-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\lambda_{d}(dy)\Bigr)\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)=-\int g_{k}(\mu,\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw), ∫ Q log p ( y ) ( ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − pr 1 ( w )) ϖ k ( pr 2 ( w ) − pr 1 ( w )) γ ( d w ) ) λ d ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ Q log p ( y ) ∂ k Θ ( y − pr 1 ( w )) λ d ( d y ) ) ϖ k ( pr 2 ( w ) − pr 1 ( w )) γ ( d w ) = − ∫ g k ( μ , pr 1 ( w )) ϖ k ( pr 2 ( w ) − pr 1 ( w )) γ ( d w ) ,
where the left side is ∫ ( ∫ Φ k ( y , w ) γ ( d w ) ) U ( d y ) \int\bigl(\int\Phi_{k}(y,w)\,\gamma(dw)\bigr)U(dy) ∫ ( ∫ Φ k ( y , w ) γ ( d w ) ) U ( d y ) and the middle is ∫ ( ∫ Φ k ( y , w ) U ( d y ) ) γ ( d w ) \int\bigl(\int\Phi_{k}(y,w)\,U(dy)\bigr)\gamma(dw) ∫ ( ∫ Φ k ( y , w ) U ( d y ) ) γ ( d w ) ; every section of the bounded function Φ k \Phi_{k} Φ k is integrable, so no exceptional null set arises. Multiplying the expansion of (iii) by log p ( y ) \log p(y) log p ( y ) , integrating over Q Q Q and summing over k k k , by The Torus Displacement Pairing of a Vector Field Along a Coupling §pairing ,
∫ Q log p ( q − p ) d λ d = ∑ k = 1 d ∫ g k ( μ , p r 1 ( w ) ) ϖ k ( p r 2 ( w ) − p r 1 ( w ) ) γ ( d w ) + ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d = J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) + ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d . \int_{Q}\log p\,(q-p)\,d\lambda_{d}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\int g_{k}(\mu,\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\varpi_{k}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\,\gamma(dw)+\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}=\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma)+\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}. ∫ Q log p ( q − p ) d λ d = k = 1 ∑ d ∫ g k ( μ , pr 1 ( w )) ϖ k ( pr 2 ( w ) − pr 1 ( w )) γ ( d w ) + ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d = J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) + ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d .
(v) Conclusion of (3.1). By (3.2), (iv), (ii) and (iii), the left side of (3.1) is at most ∫ Q R d λ d + ∣ ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d ∣ ≤ L s 2 I T ( γ ) / c s + 1 2 B d C s I T ( γ ) = K I T ( γ ) \int_{Q}R\,d\lambda_{d}+|\int_{Q}\log p\,\rho\,d\lambda_{d}|\le L_{s}^{2}I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)/c_{s}+\tfrac12 B\,d\,C_{s}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)=K\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma) ∫ Q R d λ d + ∣ ∫ Q log p ρ d λ d ∣ ≤ L s 2 I T ( γ ) / c s + 2 1 B d C s I T ( γ ) = K I T ( γ ) .
Now let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 and put θ = ε / ( K + 1 ) > 0 \theta=\varepsilon/(K+1)>0 θ = ε / ( K + 1 ) > 0 . If ν ∈ P ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P ( T d ) and γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) satisfy I T ( γ ) < θ 2 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2} I T ( γ ) < θ 2 , then by (3.1) the defect is at most K I T ( γ ) I T ( γ ) ≤ K θ I T ( γ ) ≤ ε I T ( γ ) K\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\,\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\le K\theta\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)} K I T ( γ ) I T ( γ ) ≤ K θ I T ( γ ) ≤ ε I T ( γ ) . By Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §differentiable , E n t ∘ S s \mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s} Ent ∘ S s (real-valued by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §calculus ) is differentiable along couplings at μ \mu μ with gradient the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) , and by the uniqueness in Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient , ∇ ( E n t ∘ S s ) ( μ ) \nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s})(\mu) ∇ ( Ent ∘ S s ) ( μ ) is the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) , that is A s μ ξ S s μ A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu} A s μ ξ S s μ . This is condition (b) of a gradient field .
Step 4 (Condition (c): joint continuity). Let ( μ n ) (\mu_{n}) ( μ n ) converge to μ \mu μ in ( P ( T d ) , W T ) (\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) ( P ( T d ) , W T ) and ( x n ) (x_{n}) ( x n ) converge to x x x in R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d ; write p n = p μ n p_{n}=p_{\mu_{n}} p n = p μ n , p = p μ p=p_{\mu} p = p μ , ζ n = ζ μ n \zeta^{n}=\zeta_{\mu_{n}} ζ n = ζ μ n , ζ = ζ μ \zeta=\zeta_{\mu} ζ = ζ μ . For i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] and y ∈ R d y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} y ∈ R d ,
ζ i n ( y ) − ζ i ( y ) = ∂ i p n ( y ) − ∂ i p ( y ) p n ( y ) + ∂ i p ( y ) p ( y ) − p n ( y ) p n ( y ) p ( y ) , \zeta^{n}_{i}(y)-\zeta_{i}(y)=\frac{\partial_{i}p_{n}(y)-\partial_{i}p(y)}{p_{n}(y)}+\partial_{i}p(y)\,\frac{p(y)-p_{n}(y)}{p_{n}(y)\,p(y)}, ζ i n ( y ) − ζ i ( y ) = p n ( y ) ∂ i p n ( y ) − ∂ i p ( y ) + ∂ i p ( y ) p n ( y ) p ( y ) p ( y ) − p n ( y ) ,
so by Step 0 and both inequalities of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz , sup y ∣ ζ i n ( y ) − ζ i ( y ) ∣ ≤ ε n : = ( L s / c s + C s L s / c s 2 ) W T ( μ n , μ ) \sup_{y}|\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)-\zeta_{i}(y)|\le\varepsilon_{n}:=(L_{s}/c_{s}+C_{s}L_{s}/c_{s}^{2})\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu) sup y ∣ ζ i n ( y ) − ζ i ( y ) ∣ ≤ ε n := ( L s / c s + C s L s / c s 2 ) W T ( μ n , μ ) . Let Ψ ∈ { Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ } \Psi\in\{\Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta\} Ψ ∈ { Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ } . Splitting ζ i n ( y ) Ψ ( y − x n ) − ζ i ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ) = ( ζ i n ( y ) − ζ i ( y ) ) Ψ ( y − x n ) + ζ i ( y ) ( Ψ ( y − x n ) − Ψ ( y − x ) ) \zeta^{n}_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x_{n})-\zeta_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x)=(\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)-\zeta_{i}(y))\Psi(y-x_{n})+\zeta_{i}(y)(\Psi(y-x_{n})-\Psi(y-x)) ζ i n ( y ) Ψ ( y − x n ) − ζ i ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ) = ( ζ i n ( y ) − ζ i ( y )) Ψ ( y − x n ) + ζ i ( y ) ( Ψ ( y − x n ) − Ψ ( y − x )) and using ∣ Ψ ∣ ≤ C s |\Psi|\le C_{s} ∣Ψ∣ ≤ C s , ∣ ζ i ∣ ≤ C s / c s |\zeta_{i}|\le C_{s}/c_{s} ∣ ζ i ∣ ≤ C s / c s and (0.1),
∣ ∫ Q ζ i n ( y ) Ψ ( y − x n ) λ d ( d y ) − ∫ Q ζ i ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) ∣ ≤ C s ε n + d C s 2 c s ∥ x n − x ∥ ⟶ 0 , \Bigl|\int_{Q}\zeta^{n}_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x_{n})\,\lambda_{d}(dy)-\int_{Q}\zeta_{i}(y)\Psi(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy)\Bigr|\le C_{s}\,\varepsilon_{n}+\frac{\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}^{2}}{c_{s}}\,\lVert x_{n}-x\rVert\longrightarrow0, ∫ Q ζ i n ( y ) Ψ ( y − x n ) λ d ( d y ) − ∫ Q ζ i ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) ≤ C s ε n + c s d C s 2 ∥ x n − x ∥ ⟶ 0 ,
since W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 and ∥ x n − x ∥ → 0 \lVert x_{n}-x\rVert\to0 ∥ x n − x ∥ → 0 . With Ψ = Θ \Psi=\Theta Ψ = Θ and with Ψ = ∂ j Θ \Psi=\partial_{j}\Theta Ψ = ∂ j Θ , (1.1) turns this into g i ( μ n , x n ) → g i ( μ , x ) g_{i}(\mu_{n},x_{n})\to g_{i}(\mu,x) g i ( μ n , x n ) → g i ( μ , x ) and ∂ j g i ( μ n , x n ) → ∂ j g i ( μ , x ) \partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu_{n},x_{n})\to\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x) ∂ j g i ( μ n , x n ) → ∂ j g i ( μ , x ) , which is condition (c) of a gradient field .
Step 5 (Clause 1). By Steps 1, 3 and 4, g g g is a gradient field of E n t ∘ S s \mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s} Ent ∘ S s , and by Step 1 the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) lies in T μ T_{\mu} T μ for every μ \mu μ . By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §criterion , E n t ∘ S s \mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s} Ent ∘ S s is a Laplacian test function; by Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §unique its gradient field is g g g ; and Step 3 gives ∇ ( E n t ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = A s μ ξ S s μ \nabla(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s})(\mu)=A^{\mu}_{s}\xi_{S_{s}\mu} ∇ ( Ent ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = A s μ ξ S s μ .
Step 6 (Clause 2). Let μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) . By The Laplacian of a Laplacian Test Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space §laplacian and Step 5, L ( E n t ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = ∫ ∑ i = 1 d ∂ i g i ( μ , x ) μ ( d x ) \mathcal{L}(\mathrm{Ent}\circ S_{s})(\mu)=\int\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,x)\,\mu(dx) L ( Ent ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = ∫ ∑ i = 1 d ∂ i g i ( μ , x ) μ ( d x ) . Since g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) is the heat average of F = ζ μ F=\zeta_{\mu} F = ζ μ , Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §divergence gives ∫ ∑ i ∂ i g i ( μ , ⋅ ) d μ = − ⟨ ξ S s μ , ξ S s μ ⟩ S s μ = − ∥ ξ S s μ ∥ S s μ 2 \int\sum_{i}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,\cdot)\,d\mu=-\langle\xi_{S_{s}\mu},\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rangle_{S_{s}\mu}=-\lVert\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rVert_{S_{s}\mu}^{2} ∫ ∑ i ∂ i g i ( μ , ⋅ ) d μ = − ⟨ ξ S s μ , ξ S s μ ⟩ S s μ = − ∥ ξ S s μ ∥ S s μ 2 , which is − I ( S s μ ) -\mathcal{I}(S_{s}\mu) − I ( S s μ ) by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information . ■ \blacksquare ■