Reason: Initial published proof: joint-measurability preliminaries, three-term estimate from the decomposition and covariation identities, and Gronwall via the continuous majorant.
Proof
Write 1=1Ω0, and let b, gs, and Λ be as in the statement. Since Ω0 has probability 1, expectations are unchanged when their integrands are modified off Ω0, and we use this silently below. All applications of the Tonelli theorem below are on the product of ([0,T] with the trace Borel σ-algebra and restricted Lebesgue measure) and (Ω,F,P); both factors are finite measure spaces (the first of total mass T by the toolkit, the second a probability space), hence σ-finite.
Part (a). By the joint measurability lemma, each 1Σtγ and each 1αtj is product-measurable. Each map (t,ω)↦Stγ or Atj is product-measurable, being the composition of the measurable map (t,ω)↦t (rectangle preimages) with a continuous, hence sequentially continuous, component of the trajectory pair, via measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable maps. Differences, scalar multiples, squares, and finite sums of product-measurable real maps are again product-measurable by the same composition lemma applied to the continuous arithmetic operations; hence 1∣st∣2 and 1∣at∣2 are product-measurable. For 1(gtγ)2: replace (Σt,αt) off Ω0 by the fixed point (e1,0)∈Δl×Rm with e1=(1,0,…,0); the resulting componentwise-measurable map composed with the sequentially continuous bγ is product-measurable by the composition lemma (sequential continuity of bγ on Δl×Rm follows from the joint continuity clause of the transition-rate family together with continuity of the coordinate factors in its defining formula), while bγ(St,At) is continuous in t; hence 1gtγ and 1(gtγ)2 are product-measurable. By the Tonelli theorem, t↦E[∣st∣2], t↦E[∣at∣2], and t↦E[(gtγ)2] are measurable [0,∞]-valued functions on [0,T], so A is a well-defined Lebesgue integral in [0,∞]. Every Σt lies in the probability simplex (each agent occupies exactly one state, by the derived notation of the solution definition), and any Σ∈Δl has ∣Σ∣2=∑γ(Σγ)2≤∑γΣγ=1; likewise ∣St∣≤1. Hence ∣st∣≤2N and E[∣st∣2]≤4N; and ∣bγ∣≤2(l−1)B (part (a) of the martingale decomposition theorem) gives ∣gtγ∣≤4N(l−1)B and E[(gtγ)2]≤16N(l−1)2B2.
the integrals existing since ∣gsγ∣≤4N(l−1)B pathwise.
Step 2 (three-term estimate). For real numbers, (a1+a2+a3)2≤3(a12+a22+a32), since 2apaq≤ap2+aq2. Applying this componentwise, summing over γ, and taking expectations,
For t>0, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality of the interval toolkit applied pathwise to the pair (1,gγ) on [0,t] gives (∫[0,t]gsγds)2≤t∫[0,t](gsγ)2ds≤T∫[0,t](gsγ)2ds; for t=0 both sides vanish. Taking expectations and applying the Tonelli theorem to the nonnegative product-measurable (after 1-modification) integrand,
γ∑E[(∫[0,t]gsγds)2]≤T∫[0,t]γ∑E[(gsγ)2]ds.
By the covariation identity, part (c) of the martingale decomposition theorem, with r=0, D=Ω, δ=γ, and M0γ=0: NE[(Mtγ)2]=E[∫[0,t]Θγγ(Σs,αs)ds]≤2(l−1)Bt≤2(l−1)BT, using the bound ∣Θγγ∣≤2(l−1)B from part (a) of that theorem; summing over γ gives at most 2l(l−1)BT. Combining the three estimates proves part (b).
Part (c). If A=∞ there is nothing to prove, so assume A<∞. By part (i) of the drift regularity lemma, b agrees with the extended aggregate state drift bˉ on Δl×Rm, and by its part (ii), ∣bγ(Σs,αs)−bγ(Ss,As)∣≤l+ml(B+K)d((Σs,αs),(Ss,As)), while Nd((Σs,αs),(Ss,As))2=∣ss∣2+∣as∣2. Hence
Let u(t)=E[∣st∣2], measurable by part (a) and bounded by 4N, and set a=3E[∣s0∣2]+6l(l−1)BT+3TΛ2A. Part (b) together with the display above and ∫[0,t]E[∣as∣2]ds≤A yields u(t)≤a+3TΛ2∫[0,t]u(s)ds for every t∈[0,T]. Define w(t)=a+3TΛ2∫[0,t]u(s)ds; then u≤w on [0,T], and w is continuous by the absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral applied to the bounded integrand u. By the monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral, w(t)≤a+3TΛ2∫[0,t]w(s)ds, and for the continuous function w the Lebesgue integral agrees with the Riemann integral. Gronwall's lemma applied to w with constants a and 3TΛ2 gives w(t)≤aexp(3TΛ2t), and therefore u(t)≤aexp(3TΛ2t) for every t∈[0,T], which is the claimed bound.