TheoremBase

Proof of A Convex Function is Lipschitz on a Ball around an Interior Point

theoremthm:convex-function-lipschitz-near-interior-point-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published proof: extract a radius from the interior hypothesis, bound the function above and below on the coordinate-sum ball, and push a point out along the segment to obtain the Lipschitz constant.

Proof

Since x0x_{0} is an interior point of CC, claim 1 of Interior Points in the Metric Topology are Exactly the Centres of Contained Closed Balls provides Ρ∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<Ξ΅0<\varepsilon and BΛ‰dE(x0,Ξ΅)βŠ†C\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(x_{0},\varepsilon)\subseteq C; this Ξ΅\varepsilon is fixed for the remainder of the proof.

For i∈[n]i\in[n] let e(i)∈Rne^{(i)}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} be the point whose iith coordinate is 11 and whose other coordinates are 00. All sums with a numerical index range are the finite sums of R\mathbb{R}, and 2=1+12=1+1.

Step 1: a coordinate-sum bound. Put c=βˆ‘k=1n1c=\sum_{k=1}^{n}1. Each summand is nonnegative by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums gives 1≀c1\le c; with 0<10<1 from claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of that lemma we get 0<c0<c, so cc has an inverse cβˆ’1c^{-1} with 0<cβˆ’10<c^{-1} by claim 7 of that lemma. For every y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n gives ∣yiβˆ£β‰€βˆ₯yβˆ₯|y_{i}|\le\lVert y\rVert for every i∈[n]i\in[n], so comparing the two sums termwise by Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers and using claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums,

βˆ‘i=1n∣yiβˆ£β‰€βˆ‘i=1nβˆ₯yβˆ₯=c βˆ₯yβˆ₯.(1)\sum_{i=1}^{n}|y_{i}|\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lVert y\rVert=c\,\lVert y\rVert. \tag{1}

Step 2: the coordinate neighbours lie in CC. Fix i∈[n]i\in[n]. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums, applied to the family j↦ej(i)ej(i)j\mapsto e^{(i)}_{j}e^{(i)}_{j}, which vanishes off ii,

βˆ₯e(i)βˆ₯ βˆ₯e(i)βˆ₯=e(i)β‹…e(i)=βˆ‘j=1nej(i)ej(i)=1,\lVert e^{(i)}\rVert\,\lVert e^{(i)}\rVert=e^{(i)}\cdot e^{(i)}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}e^{(i)}_{j}e^{(i)}_{j}=1,

the dot product being that of Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Writing t=βˆ₯e(i)βˆ₯t=\lVert e^{(i)}\rVert, the elementary field identities of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field turn t t=1t\,t=1 into (tβˆ’1)(t+1)=0(t-1)(t+1)=0, so t=1t=1 or t=βˆ’1t=-1 by that lemma; and claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n gives 1=∣ei(i)βˆ£β‰€t1=|e^{(i)}_{i}|\le t, which excludes t=βˆ’1t=-1, since 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, hence βˆ’1<0-1<0 by the sign reversal of claim 4 of that lemma, hence βˆ’1<1-1<1 by claim 1. Hence βˆ₯e(i)βˆ₯=1\lVert e^{(i)}\rVert=1.

By claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the value ∣Ρ∣=βˆ£βˆ’Ξ΅βˆ£=Ξ΅|\varepsilon|=|-\varepsilon|=\varepsilon from Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, both βˆ₯Ξ΅e(i)βˆ₯\lVert\varepsilon e^{(i)}\rVert and βˆ₯βˆ’Ξ΅e(i)βˆ₯\lVert-\varepsilon e^{(i)}\rVert equal Ξ΅\varepsilon. Since dE(x0,x0+v)=βˆ₯vβˆ₯d_{E}(x_{0},x_{0}+v)=\lVert v\rVert for every v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, the points x0+Ξ΅e(i)x_{0}+\varepsilon e^{(i)} and x0βˆ’Ξ΅e(i)x_{0}-\varepsilon e^{(i)} lie in BΛ‰dE(x0,Ξ΅)\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(x_{0},\varepsilon), hence in CC; and dE(x0,x0)=0≀Ρd_{E}(x_{0},x_{0})=0\le\varepsilon puts x0x_{0} in CC as well.

Step 3: an upper bound at those points. Let g:[n]β†’Rg:[n]\to\mathbb{R} be the family

gi=∣u(x0+Ξ΅e(i))∣+∣u(x0βˆ’Ξ΅e(i))∣,g_{i}=\bigl|u(x_{0}+\varepsilon e^{(i)})\bigr|+\bigl|u(x_{0}-\varepsilon e^{(i)})\bigr| ,

and put M=∣u(x0)∣+βˆ‘i=1ngiM=|u(x_{0})|+\sum_{i=1}^{n}g_{i}. Absolute values are nonnegative by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so each gig_{i} is nonnegative by claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; hence claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives 0β‰€βˆ‘i=1ngi0\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}g_{i} and claim 6 of that lemma gives giβ‰€βˆ‘j=1ngjg_{i}\le\sum_{j=1}^{n}g_{j} for every i∈[n]i\in[n]. Using wβ‰€βˆ£w∣w\le|w| from claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and the additions of claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

u(x0)β‰€βˆ£u(x0)βˆ£β‰€M,u(x0Β±Ξ΅e(i))β‰€βˆ£u(x0Β±Ξ΅e(i))βˆ£β‰€giβ‰€βˆ‘j=1ngj≀M,u(x_{0})\le|u(x_{0})|\le M,\qquad u\bigl(x_{0}\pm\varepsilon e^{(i)}\bigr)\le\bigl|u(x_{0}\pm\varepsilon e^{(i)})\bigr|\le g_{i}\le\sum_{j=1}^{n}g_{j}\le M ,

where in each chain the omitted terms are nonnegative and claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field supplies transitivity.

Step 4: bounds on the coordinate-sum ball. Let

P={x∈Rn:βˆ‘i=1n∣xiβˆ’(x0)iβˆ£β‰€Ξ΅}.P=\Bigl\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl|x_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}\bigr|\le\varepsilon\Bigr\}.

By Steps 2 and 3 the hypotheses of A Convex Function is Bounded Above near a Point by its Values at Coordinate Neighbours hold with r=Ξ΅r=\varepsilon and with this MM, so PβŠ†CP\subseteq C and u(w)≀Mu(w)\le M for every w∈Pw\in P.

The point x0x_{0} lies in PP, since every term of its defining sum is ∣0∣=0|0|=0 and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums makes the sum 00. If x∈Px\in P and xβ€²=x0+(x0βˆ’x)x'=x_{0}+(x_{0}-x), then xiβ€²βˆ’(x0)i=βˆ’(xiβˆ’(x0)i)x'_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}=-\bigl(x_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}\bigr), so ∣xiβ€²βˆ’(x0)i∣=∣xiβˆ’(x0)i∣|x'_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}|=|x_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}| by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field together with βˆ£βˆ’1∣=1|-1|=1; hence xβ€²βˆˆPx'\in P. So A Convex Function Bounded Above on a Set Symmetric about a Point is Bounded Below on It applies with D=PD=P and gives

m≀u(w)forΒ everyΒ w∈P,whereΒ m=2 u(x0)βˆ’M.m\le u(w)\qquad\text{for every }w\in P,\qquad\text{where }m=2\,u(x_{0})-M .

Since u(x0)≀Mu(x_{0})\le M, multiplying by the nonnegative number 22 by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and adding βˆ’M-M by claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give m≀Mm\le M, so 0≀Mβˆ’m0\le M-m.

Step 5: the radius. Put h=Ρ 2βˆ’1h=\varepsilon\,2^{-1} and ρ=h cβˆ’1\rho=h\,c^{-1}; here 0<2βˆ’10<2^{-1} and 0<h0<h and 0<ρ0<\rho by claims 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and h+h=Ξ΅(2βˆ’1+2βˆ’1)=Ξ΅h+h=\varepsilon(2^{-1}+2^{-1})=\varepsilon. Also h≀Ρh\le\varepsilon, since Ξ΅βˆ’h=h\varepsilon-h=h is nonnegative. If x∈BΛ‰dE(x0,ρ)x\in\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(x_{0},\rho), then βˆ₯xβˆ’x0βˆ₯≀ρ\lVert x-x_{0}\rVert\le\rho, so by (1)(1) and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

βˆ‘i=1n∣xiβˆ’(x0)iβˆ£β‰€c βˆ₯xβˆ’x0βˆ₯≀c ρ=h.(2)\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl|x_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}\bigr|\le c\,\lVert x-x_{0}\rVert\le c\,\rho=h .\tag{2}

In particular BΛ‰dE(x0,ρ)βŠ†PβŠ†C\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(x_{0},\rho)\subseteq P\subseteq C.

Step 6: the Lipschitz estimate. Put L=c hβˆ’1(Mβˆ’m)L=c\,h^{-1}(M-m), a product of nonnegative numbers and hence nonnegative by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Let x,y∈BΛ‰dE(x0,ρ)x,y\in\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(x_{0},\rho).

If x=yx=y, then u(y)βˆ’u(x)=0u(y)-u(x)=0 and βˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯=0\lVert y-x\rVert=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so both sides of the asserted inequality are 00.

Suppose xβ‰ yx\ne y and put Ξ΄=βˆ‘i=1n∣yiβˆ’xi∣\delta=\sum_{i=1}^{n}|y_{i}-x_{i}|. The summands are nonnegative, so 0≀δ0\le\delta by claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums; and if Ξ΄\delta were 00 the second part of that claim would force ∣yiβˆ’xi∣=0|y_{i}-x_{i}|=0, hence yi=xiy_{i}=x_{i}, for every i∈[n]i\in[n], contradicting xβ‰ yx\ne y. So 0<Ξ΄0<\delta and Ξ΄βˆ’1\delta^{-1} exists with 0<Ξ΄βˆ’10<\delta^{-1}.

Put ΞΌ=hβ€‰Ξ΄βˆ’1\mu=h\,\delta^{-1} and z=y+μ (yβˆ’x)z=y+\mu\,(y-x). By claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, by ∣μ∣=ΞΌ|\mu|=\mu, and by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums,

βˆ‘i=1n∣ziβˆ’yi∣=βˆ‘i=1nΞΌβ€‰βˆ£yiβˆ’xi∣=μ δ=h.\sum_{i=1}^{n}|z_{i}-y_{i}|=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\mu\,|y_{i}-x_{i}|=\mu\,\delta=h .

The triangle inequality of claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ∣ziβˆ’(x0)iβˆ£β‰€βˆ£ziβˆ’yi∣+∣yiβˆ’(x0)i∣|z_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}|\le|z_{i}-y_{i}|+|y_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}| for every i∈[n]i\in[n], so Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, claim 2 of Properties of Finite Sums and the bound (2)(2) applied to yy give

βˆ‘i=1n∣ziβˆ’(x0)iβˆ£β‰€h+βˆ‘i=1n∣yiβˆ’(x0)iβˆ£β‰€h+h=Ξ΅,\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl|z_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}\bigr|\le h+\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl|y_{i}-(x_{0})_{i}\bigr|\le h+h=\varepsilon ,

so z∈Pz\in P.

Put Ξ»=δ (Ξ΄+h)βˆ’1\lambda=\delta\,(\delta+h)^{-1}, which is defined and nonnegative because 0<Ξ΄+h0<\delta+h. From δ≀δ+h\delta\le\delta+h and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, multiplying by the nonnegative number (Ξ΄+h)βˆ’1(\delta+h)^{-1} gives λ≀1\lambda\le1; and 1βˆ’Ξ»=h (Ξ΄+h)βˆ’11-\lambda=h\,(\delta+h)^{-1}, since Ξ΄(Ξ΄+h)βˆ’1+h(Ξ΄+h)βˆ’1=(Ξ΄+h)(Ξ΄+h)βˆ’1=1\delta(\delta+h)^{-1}+h(\delta+h)^{-1}=(\delta+h)(\delta+h)^{-1}=1. For every i∈[n]i\in[n], using δμ=h\delta\mu=h,

δ zi+h xi=δ yi+h (yiβˆ’xi)+h xi=(Ξ΄+h) yi,\delta\,z_{i}+h\,x_{i}=\delta\,y_{i}+h\,(y_{i}-x_{i})+h\,x_{i}=(\delta+h)\,y_{i},

and multiplying by (Ξ΄+h)βˆ’1(\delta+h)^{-1} gives Ξ»zi+(1βˆ’Ξ»)xi=yi\lambda z_{i}+(1-\lambda)x_{i}=y_{i}. Hence y=Ξ»z+(1βˆ’Ξ»)xy=\lambda z+(1-\lambda)x.

The points xx, yy and zz all lie in PP, on which m≀u≀Mm\le u\le M by Step 4, so Increment Bound for a Convex Function through an Extended Point applies with D=PD=P and gives u(y)βˆ’u(x)≀λ(Mβˆ’m)u(y)-u(x)\le\lambda(M-m).

It remains to bound Ξ»\lambda. From h≀δ+hh\le\delta+h and 0≀λ0\le\lambda, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives Ξ»h≀λ(Ξ΄+h)=Ξ΄\lambda h\le\lambda(\delta+h)=\delta, and multiplying by the nonnegative number hβˆ’1h^{-1} gives λ≀δ hβˆ’1\lambda\le\delta\,h^{-1}. Multiplying by the nonnegative number Mβˆ’mM-m, then using (1)(1) with yβˆ’xy-x in place of yy and multiplying by the nonnegative number hβˆ’1(Mβˆ’m)h^{-1}(M-m), and finally using claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

u(y)βˆ’u(x)≀λ (Mβˆ’m)≀δ hβˆ’1(Mβˆ’m)≀c βˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯ hβˆ’1(Mβˆ’m)=L βˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯.u(y)-u(x)\le\lambda\,(M-m)\le\delta\,h^{-1}(M-m)\le c\,\lVert y-x\rVert\,h^{-1}(M-m)=L\,\lVert y-x\rVert .

Interchanging the roles of xx and yy leaves Ξ΄\delta unchanged, because ∣xiβˆ’yi∣=∣yiβˆ’xi∣|x_{i}-y_{i}|=|y_{i}-x_{i}|, and leaves βˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯\lVert y-x\rVert unchanged, by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the factor βˆ’1-1; the same argument therefore gives u(x)βˆ’u(y)≀Lβˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯u(x)-u(y)\le L\lVert y-x\rVert. Claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field now yields

∣u(y)βˆ’u(x)βˆ£β‰€L βˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯.\bigl|u(y)-u(x)\bigr|\le L\,\lVert y-x\rVert .
Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…