TheoremBase

Proof of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function

theoremthm:exponential-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial published proof of the basic properties of the exponential function; approved by Aaron.

Proof

Claim 1. exp⁑(0)=1\exp(0)=1 directly from the series of The Real Exponential Function with the convention 00=10^{0}=1. For multiplicativity, form the Cauchy product of the two absolutely convergent series: the family ujvk/(j!k!)u^{j}v^{k}/(j!k!) over pairs (j,k)(j,k) is absolutely summable (its absolute sums are bounded by the product of the two absolute-value series), so it may be summed by diagonals β€” for series of nonnegative terms every rearrangement has the same supremum of finite partial sums, and the general case follows by splitting into positive and negative parts. Grouping by j+k=lj+k=l and using the binomial expansion (u+v)l=βˆ‘j≀l(lj)ujvlβˆ’j(u+v)^{l}=\sum_{j\le l}\binom{l}{j}u^{j}v^{l-j} with (lj)=l!/(j!(lβˆ’j)!)\binom{l}{j}=l!/(j!(l-j)!) (Factorial of a Natural Number) gives exp⁑(u)exp⁑(v)=βˆ‘l(u+v)l/l!=exp⁑(u+v)\exp(u)\exp(v)=\sum_{l}(u+v)^{l}/l!=\exp(u+v).

Claim 2. By claim 1, exp⁑(u)exp⁑(βˆ’u)=exp⁑(0)=1\exp(u)\exp(-u)=\exp(0)=1, so exp⁑(u)β‰ 0\exp(u)\ne 0 and exp⁑(βˆ’u)=1/exp⁑(u)\exp(-u)=1/\exp(u). For uβ‰₯0u\ge 0 the series has nonnegative terms and constant term 11, so exp⁑(u)β‰₯1>0\exp(u)\ge 1>0; for u<0u<0, exp⁑(u)=1/exp⁑(βˆ’u)>0\exp(u)=1/\exp(-u)>0.

Claim 3. From the series, for ∣sβˆ£β‰€1|s|\le 1,

∣exp⁑(s)βˆ’1βˆ’s∣=βˆ£βˆ‘kβ‰₯2skk!βˆ£β‰€s2βˆ‘kβ‰₯2∣s∣kβˆ’2k!≀s2exp⁑(∣s∣)≀3s2,|\exp(s)-1-s|=\Bigl|\sum_{k\ge 2}\frac{s^{k}}{k!}\Bigr|\le s^{2}\sum_{k\ge 2}\frac{|s|^{k-2}}{k!}\le s^{2}\exp(|s|)\le 3s^{2},

so (exp⁑(s)βˆ’1)/sβ†’1\bigl(\exp(s)-1\bigr)/s\to 1 as sβ†’0s\to 0. By claim 1, (exp⁑(u+s)βˆ’exp⁑(u))/s=exp⁑(u)(exp⁑(s)βˆ’1)/sβ†’exp⁑(u)\bigl(\exp(u+s)-\exp(u)\bigr)/s=\exp(u)\bigl(\exp(s)-1\bigr)/s\to\exp(u), so exp⁑\exp has derivative exp⁑′=exp⁑\exp'=\exp at every point. Iterating, all higher derivatives exist and equal exp⁑\exp, which is continuous (differentiability at a point implies continuity there, directly from the definition of the derivative and limit arithmetic); hence exp⁑\exp is a smooth map on R=R1\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}^1.

Claim 4. exp⁑(u)β‰₯1+u\exp(u)\ge 1+u for uβ‰₯0u\ge 0: all omitted series terms are nonnegative. Strict monotonicity: for u<vu<v, claims 1 and 2 give exp⁑(v)βˆ’exp⁑(u)=exp⁑(u)(exp⁑(vβˆ’u)βˆ’1)β‰₯exp⁑(u)(vβˆ’u)>0\exp(v)-\exp(u)=\exp(u)\bigl(\exp(v-u)-1\bigr)\ge\exp(u)(v-u)>0. Decay at βˆ’βˆž-\infty: given Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 choose M>0M>0 with 1/(1+M)<Ξ΅1/(1+M)<\varepsilon; for u<βˆ’Mu<-M, exp⁑(βˆ’u)β‰₯1+(βˆ’u)>1+M\exp(-u)\ge 1+(-u)>1+M, so exp⁑(u)=1/exp⁑(βˆ’u)<Ξ΅\exp(u)=1/\exp(-u)<\varepsilon.

Claim 5. Injectivity is strict monotonicity (claim 4). For surjectivity onto (0,∞)(0,\infty), let tβ‰₯1t\ge 1 (the case 0<t<10<t<1 follows by applying the result to 1/t1/t and using claim 2). The set S={u∈[0,t]:exp⁑(u)≀t}S=\{u\in[0,t]:\exp(u)\le t\} contains 00 and is bounded above by tt, so it has a least upper bound ss by Least Upper Bound Property of the Real Numbers. Since exp⁑\exp is continuous at ss (claim 3): if exp⁑(s)<t\exp(s)<t, then s<ts<t (as exp⁑(t)β‰₯1+t>t\exp(t)\ge 1+t>t) and exp⁑<t\exp<t on a neighborhood of ss, contradicting that ss is an upper bound of SS; if exp⁑(s)>t\exp(s)>t, then exp⁑>t\exp>t on a neighborhood of ss, contradicting that ss is the least upper bound (points of SS would be excluded from that neighborhood, giving a smaller upper bound). Hence exp⁑(s)=t\exp(s)=t, and exp⁑\exp is a bijection from R\mathbb{R} onto (0,∞)(0,\infty) (the image is contained in (0,∞)(0,\infty) by claim 2). β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…