TheoremBase

Pointwise, |f|² is the sum of the squared components and f·g the sum of the products of components; the finite-sum rule for integrals then reduces every clause to the scalar space of square-integrable functions, and almost-everywhere statements are handled with the intersection and monotonicity of almost-everywhere properties.

Proof

Pointwise identities. Let f,g:X→Rnf,g:X\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be functions whose components are all measurable. For x∈Xx\in X, by Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (i) and The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (i),

∣f∣2(x)=∥f(x)∥2=∑k=1nfk(x)2=∑k=1n∣fk∣2(x),(f⋅g)(x)=∑k=1nfk(x) gk(x),|f|^{2}(x)=\lVert f(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}f_{k}(x)^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}|f_{k}|^{2}(x),\qquad (f\cdot g)(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}f_{k}(x)\,g_{k}(x),

where ∣fk∣2|f_{k}|^{2} is the function of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i) with p=2p=2, whose value ∣fk(x)∣2|f_{k}(x)|^{2}, a real power, is fk(x)2f_{k}(x)^{2} by Properties of Real Powers (i). Since the terms are nonnegative, Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality (vi) gives

∣fk∣2(x)≤∣f∣2(x)(x∈X, k∈[n]).(1)|f_{k}|^{2}(x)\le|f|^{2}(x)\qquad(x\in X,\ k\in[n]). \tag{1}

Components. Let f:X→Rnf:X\to\mathbb{R}^{n}. If f∈L2(μ;Rn)f\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}), then ff is measurable and so is every fkf_{k}; if every fkf_{k} lies in L2(μ)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu), every fkf_{k} is measurable and so is ff (both by Vector- and Matrix-Valued Measurable Maps: Components, Entries and Continuous Images (i)). In either case the pointwise identities apply.

Suppose f∈L2(μ;Rn)f\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}) and let k∈[n]k\in[n]. By (1) and Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (iii), ∫∣fk∣2 dμ≤∫∣f∣2 dμ<∞\int|f_{k}|^{2}\,d\mu\le\int|f|^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, so fk∈L2(μ)f_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu) (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii)).

Suppose now fk∈L2(μ)f_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu) for every k∈[n]k\in[n]. By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (ii), ∣fk∣2∈L1(μ)|f_{k}|^{2}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) with ∫∣fk∣2 dμ=∥fk∥22\int|f_{k}|^{2}\,d\mu=\|f_{k}\|_{2}^{2}. By Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (viii), with all coefficients 11, the function ∑k=1n∣fk∣2\sum_{k=1}^{n}|f_{k}|^{2}, which is ∣f∣2|f|^{2}, lies in L1(μ)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) and

∫∣f∣2 dμ=∑k=1n∫∣fk∣2 dμ=∑k=1n∥fk∥22.\int|f|^{2}\,d\mu=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\int|f_{k}|^{2}\,d\mu=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\|f_{k}\|_{2}^{2}.

As ∣f∣2|f|^{2} is measurable with nonnegative real values, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vi) shows that its integral as an element of M+\mathcal{M}^{+} is finite and equal to this one. Hence f∈L2(μ;Rn)f\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}), and the formula of (i) holds. By the previous paragraph it holds for every f∈L2(μ;Rn)f\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Dot products. Let f,g∈L2(μ;Rn)f,g\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}). By (i), fk,gk∈L2(μ)f_{k},g_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu), so fkgk∈L1(μ)f_{k}g_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) for every k∈[n]k\in[n] by Hölder's Inequality (ii). As f⋅g=∑k=1nfkgkf\cdot g=\sum_{k=1}^{n}f_{k}g_{k} pointwise, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (viii) gives f⋅g∈L1(μ)f\cdot g\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) and the formula of (ii).

Linear combinations. Let f,g∈L2(μ;Rn)f,g\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}) and a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}. For k∈[n]k\in[n], (af+bg)k=afk+bgk(af+bg)_{k}=af_{k}+bg_{k} by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (iv), and this lies in L2(μ)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu) by (i) and Minkowski's Inequality (i) with p=2p=2. By (i), af+bg∈L2(μ;Rn)af+bg\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}). By the vector-space laws of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} at each point, f+g=1f+1gf+g=1f+1g, af=af+0gaf=af+0g, −f=(−1)f+0g-f=(-1)f+0g and f−g=1f+(−1)gf-g=1f+(-1)g, which gives the particular cases.

Equivalence relation. For functions f,g:X→Rnf,g:X\to\mathbb{R}^{n} write E(f,g)={x∈X:f(x)=g(x)}E(f,g)=\{x\in X:f(x)=g(x)\}, so that f∼gf\sim g means that E(f,g)E(f,g) holds μ\mu-almost everywhere. Let f,g,h∈L2(μ;Rn)f,g,h\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}). Reflexivity: X∖E(f,f)=∅X\setminus E(f,f)=\emptyset, which is μ\mu-null since ∅∈F\emptyset\in\mathcal{F} and μ(∅)=0\mu(\emptyset)=0 (Closure Properties of σ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of σ-Algebras, and the Generated σ-Algebra (vi), Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i) and Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (i)). Symmetry: E(f,g)=E(g,f)E(f,g)=E(g,f). Transitivity: if f∼gf\sim g and g∼hg\sim h, then E(f,g)∩E(g,h)E(f,g)\cap E(g,h) holds almost everywhere by Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vii), and it is contained in E(f,h)E(f,h), so f∼hf\sim h by Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vi). Thus ∼\sim is an equivalence relation on L2(μ;Rn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Equivalence Relations on a Set (i)).

If f∼gf\sim g and k∈[n]k\in[n], then E(f,g)⊆{x∈X:fk(x)=gk(x)}E(f,g)\subseteq\{x\in X:f_{k}(x)=g_{k}(x)\}, so fk=gkf_{k}=g_{k} almost everywhere by Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vi). Conversely, suppose fk=gkf_{k}=g_{k} almost everywhere for every k∈[n]k\in[n]. By (iii), f−g∈L2(μ;Rn)f-g\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}), and its components (f−g)k=fk−gk(f-g)_{k}=f_{k}-g_{k} (Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (iv)) lie in L2(μ)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu) by (i) and vanish almost everywhere, so ∥fk−gk∥2=0\|f_{k}-g_{k}\|_{2}=0 by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (vii). By (i) and Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality (iv),

∫∣f−g∣2 dμ=∑k=1n∥fk−gk∥22=0.\int|f-g|^{2}\,d\mu=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\|f_{k}-g_{k}\|_{2}^{2}=0 .

By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iv), ∥f(x)−g(x)∥2=0\lVert f(x)-g(x)\rVert^{2}=0 for almost every xx, and at every such xx, f(x)=g(x)f(x)=g(x) by Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (iii). Hence f∼gf\sim g, by Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vi).

Compatibility. Let f,f′,g,g′f,f',g,g' and aa be as in (v). The set Q=E(f,f′)∩E(g,g′)Q=E(f,f')\cap E(g,g') holds almost everywhere by Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vii), and for x∈Qx\in Q,

f(x)+g(x)=f′(x)+g′(x),af(x)=af′(x),f(x)⋅g(x)=f′(x)⋅g′(x).f(x)+g(x)=f'(x)+g'(x),\qquad af(x)=af'(x),\qquad f(x)\cdot g(x)=f'(x)\cdot g'(x).

By Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vi), f+g∼f′+g′f+g\sim f'+g' and af∼af′af\sim af', these functions lying in L2(μ;Rn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{n}) by (iii), and f⋅g=f′⋅g′f\cdot g=f'\cdot g' almost everywhere. Since f⋅gf\cdot g and f′⋅g′f'\cdot g' lie in L1(μ)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) by (ii), their integrals agree by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…