Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Throughout, ξ n \xi_{n} ξ n abbreviates ξ ν n \xi_{\nu_{n}} ξ ν n . Fixing any n 0 ∈ N n_{0}\in\mathbb{N} n 0 ∈ N , one has 0 ≤ ∥ ξ n 0 ∥ ν n 0 2 = I ( ν n 0 ) ≤ C 0\le\lVert\xi_{n_{0}}\rVert_{\nu_{n_{0}}}^{2}=\mathcal{I}(\nu_{n_{0}})\le C 0 ≤ ∥ ξ n 0 ∥ ν n 0 2 = I ( ν n 0 ) ≤ C by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information , so C ≥ 0 C\ge0 C ≥ 0 and C \sqrt{C} C is defined; and ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n = I ( ν n ) ≤ C \lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}=\sqrt{\mathcal{I}(\nu_{n})}\le\sqrt{C} ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n = I ( ν n ) ≤ C for every n n n . For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) the space L 2 ( μ ; R d ) L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ; R d ) is a real inner product space with norm ∥ ⋅ ∥ μ \lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} ∥ ⋅ ∥ μ by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product (see Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields ), so the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality ∣ ⟨ α , β ⟩ μ ∣ ≤ ∥ α ∥ μ ∥ β ∥ μ |\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle_{\mu}|\le\lVert\alpha\rVert_{\mu}\lVert\beta\rVert_{\mu} ∣ ⟨ α , β ⟩ μ ∣ ≤ ∥ α ∥ μ ∥ β ∥ μ holds in it. Since ( ν n ) (\nu_{n}) ( ν n ) converges to ν \nu ν in ( P ( T d ) , W T ) (\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) ( P ( T d ) , W T ) , the real sequence ( W T ( ν n , ν ) ) n ∈ N (W_{\mathbb{T}}(\nu_{n},\nu))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( W T ( ν n , ν ) ) n ∈ N converges to 0 0 0 .
Step 1 (a Lipschitz bound in the torus distance). Let u ∈ C p e r 1 u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} u ∈ C per 1 . We show that there is a real L u ≥ 0 L_{u}\ge0 L u ≥ 0 with ∣ u ( y ) − u ( x ) ∣ ≤ L u d T ( x , y ) |u(y)-u(x)|\le L_{u}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) ∣ u ( y ) − u ( x ) ∣ ≤ L u d T ( x , y ) for all x , y ∈ R d x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , y ∈ R d . For each i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] the function ∂ i u \partial_{i}u ∂ i u belongs to C p e r C_{\mathrm{per}} C per by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative , so there is a real M i ≥ 0 M_{i}\ge0 M i ≥ 0 with ∣ ∂ i u ∣ ≤ M i |\partial_{i}u|\le M_{i} ∣ ∂ i u ∣ ≤ M i on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §bounded ; put L u = M 1 + ⋯ + M d L_{u}=M_{1}+\dots+M_{d} L u = M 1 + ⋯ + M d . Let x , y ∈ R d x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , y ∈ R d , put v = ϖ ( y − x ) v=\varpi(y-x) v = ϖ ( y − x ) and z = x + v z=x+v z = x + v . By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , y − z = ( y − x ) − ϖ ( y − x ) ∈ Z d y-z=(y-x)-\varpi(y-x)\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} y − z = ( y − x ) − ϖ ( y − x ) ∈ Z d , so u ( y ) = u ( z ) u(y)=u(z) u ( y ) = u ( z ) by the periodicity of u u u ; and ∥ v ∥ = d T ( x , y ) \lVert v\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) ∥ v ∥ = d T ( x , y ) by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance . If v = 0 v=0 v = 0 , then u ( y ) = u ( x ) u(y)=u(x) u ( y ) = u ( x ) and there is nothing to prove. Otherwise let F : [ 0 , 1 ] → R F:[0,1]\to\mathbb{R} F : [ 0 , 1 ] → R , F ( τ ) = u ( x + τ v ) F(\tau)=u(x+\tau v) F ( τ ) = u ( x + τv ) . Since R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d is open (claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and C k C^k C k Maps are Continuous ) and u u u is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on it, Derivatives Along a Segment for C^1 Functions on a Euclidean Open Set (claims 2 and 3, with J = [ 0 , 1 ] J=[0,1] J = [ 0 , 1 ] ) shows that F F F is continuous on [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] [ 0 , 1 ] and differentiable at every τ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) \tau\in(0,1) τ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) with F ′ ( τ ) = ∑ i = 1 d ∂ i u ( x + τ v ) v i F'(\tau)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}u(x+\tau v)\,v_{i} F ′ ( τ ) = ∑ i = 1 d ∂ i u ( x + τv ) v i . By the mean value theorem there is c ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) c\in(0,1) c ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) with u ( z ) − u ( x ) = F ( 1 ) − F ( 0 ) = F ′ ( c ) u(z)-u(x)=F(1)-F(0)=F'(c) u ( z ) − u ( x ) = F ( 1 ) − F ( 0 ) = F ′ ( c ) , whence
∣ u ( y ) − u ( x ) ∣ = ∣ F ′ ( c ) ∣ ≤ ∑ i = 1 d M i ∣ v i ∣ ≤ L u ∥ v ∥ = L u d T ( x , y ) . |u(y)-u(x)|=|F'(c)|\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}M_{i}\,|v_{i}|\le L_{u}\lVert v\rVert=L_{u}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y). ∣ u ( y ) − u ( x ) ∣ = ∣ F ′ ( c ) ∣ ≤ i = 1 ∑ d M i ∣ v i ∣ ≤ L u ∥ v ∥ = L u d T ( x , y ) .
Step 2 (two limits for a fixed smooth periodic function). Let f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ . By Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §calculus , Δ f \Delta f Δ f is continuous and periodic, that is, Δ f ∈ C p e r \Delta f\in C_{\mathrm{per}} Δ f ∈ C per . The partial derivatives ∂ i f \partial_{i}f ∂ i f belong to C p e r ∞ C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} C per ∞ by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative , hence to C p e r C_{\mathrm{per}} C per (a smooth map is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set , hence continuous by C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set ), so ∥ ∇ f ∥ 2 = ∑ i = 1 d ( ∂ i f ) 2 ∈ C p e r \lVert\nabla f\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(\partial_{i}f)^{2}\in C_{\mathrm{per}} ∥ ∇ f ∥ 2 = ∑ i = 1 d ( ∂ i f ) 2 ∈ C per by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §algebra . By The Torus Wasserstein Distance: Comparison with the Euclidean Distance, Wrapping, and Integrals of Periodic Functions §integrals , applied to these two functions,
∫ Δ f d ν n → ∫ Δ f d ν , ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n 2 = ∫ ∥ ∇ f ∥ 2 d ν n → ∫ ∥ ∇ f ∥ 2 d ν = ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν 2 \int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}\to\int\Delta f\,d\nu,\qquad\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2}=\int\lVert\nabla f\rVert^{2}\,d\nu_{n}\to\int\lVert\nabla f\rVert^{2}\,d\nu=\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}^{2} ∫ Δ f d ν n → ∫ Δ f d ν , ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n 2 = ∫ ∥ ∇ f ∥ 2 d ν n → ∫ ∥ ∇ f ∥ 2 d ν = ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν 2
as n → ∞ n\to\infty n → ∞ . Moreover, by the defining property of the score Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for every n n n ,
∣ ∫ Δ f d ν n ∣ = ∣ ⟨ ξ n , ∇ f ⟩ ν n ∣ ≤ ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n ≤ C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n . \Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}\Bigr|=|\langle\xi_{n},\nabla f\rangle_{\nu_{n}}|\le\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}. ∫ Δ f d ν n = ∣ ⟨ ξ n , ∇ f ⟩ ν n ∣ ≤ ∥ ξ n ∥ ν n ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n ≤ C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n .
Step 3 (claim 1). Let f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ . By Step 2, ∣ ∫ Δ f d ν n ∣ ≤ C ( ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n 2 ) 1 / 2 |\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}|\le\sqrt{C}\,(\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2})^{1/2} ∣ ∫ Δ f d ν n ∣ ≤ C (∥ ∇ f ∥ ν n 2 ) 1/2 for every n n n ; the left side converges to ∣ ∫ Δ f d ν ∣ |\int\Delta f\,d\nu| ∣ ∫ Δ f d ν ∣ and the right side to C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν \sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu} C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν , by continuity of the absolute value (claim 4 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences ) and of the square root on [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) (Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity , with t 1 / 2 = t t^{1/2}=\sqrt{t} t 1/2 = t by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement ), together with claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences for the factor C \sqrt{C} C . Non-strict inequalities between terms of convergent real sequences pass to the limits (claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences ), so
∣ ∫ Δ f d ν ∣ ≤ C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν for every f ∈ C p e r ∞ . \Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu\Bigr|\le\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}\qquad\text{for every }f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}. ∫ Δ f d ν ≤ C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν for every f ∈ C per ∞ .
Since C ≥ 0 \sqrt{C}\ge0 C ≥ 0 , this says that ν ∈ P I ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P I ( T d ) by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §finite . Let ℓ ( f ) = − ∫ Δ f d ν \ell(f)=-\int\Delta f\,d\nu ℓ ( f ) = − ∫ Δ f d ν for f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ ; as recorded in Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score , ℓ \ell ℓ is linear, and ∣ ℓ ( f ) ∣ ≤ C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν |\ell(f)|\le\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu} ∣ ℓ ( f ) ∣ ≤ C ∥ ∇ f ∥ ν by the display. By The Torus Tangent Space: Linearity of the Periodic Calculus, Closed Subspace, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §representation , applied with the constant C \sqrt{C} C , there is exactly one ζ ∈ T ν \zeta\in T_{\nu} ζ ∈ T ν with ⟨ ζ , ∇ f ⟩ ν = ℓ ( f ) \langle\zeta,\nabla f\rangle_{\nu}=\ell(f) ⟨ ζ , ∇ f ⟩ ν = ℓ ( f ) for every f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ , and ∥ ζ ∥ ν ≤ C \lVert\zeta\rVert_{\nu}\le\sqrt{C} ∥ ζ ∥ ν ≤ C . The score ξ ν \xi_{\nu} ξ ν lies in T ν T_{\nu} T ν and has the same property by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score , so ξ ν = ζ \xi_{\nu}=\zeta ξ ν = ζ , and I ( ν ) = ∥ ξ ν ∥ ν 2 ≤ C \mathcal{I}(\nu)=\lVert\xi_{\nu}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}\le C I ( ν ) = ∥ ξ ν ∥ ν 2 ≤ C by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information . In particular ∥ ξ ν ∥ ν ≤ C \lVert\xi_{\nu}\rVert_{\nu}\le\sqrt{C} ∥ ξ ν ∥ ν ≤ C .
Step 4 (set-up for claim 2). By convergence along couplings there are γ n ∈ Π ( ν n , ν ) \gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\nu) γ n ∈ Π ( ν n , ν ) such that I T ( γ n ) → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0 I T ( γ n ) → 0 and D γ n ( η n , η ) → 0 D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)\to0 D γ n ( η n , η ) → 0 ; fix them, together with Borel representatives of η n \eta_{n} η n and η \eta η . For f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ the components of ∇ f \nabla f ∇ f lie in C p e r ∞ ⊆ C p e r 1 C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}\subseteq C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} C per ∞ ⊆ C per 1 (Step 2), so by Step 1 there are reals L 1 , … , L d ≥ 0 L_{1},\dots,L_{d}\ge0 L 1 , … , L d ≥ 0 with ∣ ∂ i f ( y ) − ∂ i f ( x ) ∣ ≤ L i d T ( x , y ) |\partial_{i}f(y)-\partial_{i}f(x)|\le L_{i}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) ∣ ∂ i f ( y ) − ∂ i f ( x ) ∣ ≤ L i d T ( x , y ) ; with L f = L 1 + ⋯ + L d L_{f}=L_{1}+\dots+L_{d} L f = L 1 + ⋯ + L d this gives
∥ ∇ f ( y ) − ∇ f ( x ) ∥ ≤ ∑ i = 1 d ∣ ∂ i f ( y ) − ∂ i f ( x ) ∣ ≤ L f d T ( x , y ) ( x , y ∈ R d ) . \lVert\nabla f(y)-\nabla f(x)\rVert\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}|\partial_{i}f(y)-\partial_{i}f(x)|\le L_{f}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)\qquad(x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}). ∥ ∇ f ( y ) − ∇ f ( x )∥ ≤ i = 1 ∑ d ∣ ∂ i f ( y ) − ∂ i f ( x ) ∣ ≤ L f d T ( x , y ) ( x , y ∈ R d ) .
Step 5 (the estimate for a fixed smooth periodic function). Let f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ and n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N . By bilinearity of the inner products,
⟨ η n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν = ⟨ η n − ∇ f , ξ n ⟩ ν n + ( ⟨ ∇ f , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ ∇ f , ξ ν ⟩ ν ) + ⟨ ∇ f − η , ξ ν ⟩ ν . \langle\eta_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}=\langle\eta_{n}-\nabla f,\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}+\bigl(\langle\nabla f,\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\nabla f,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}\bigr)+\langle\nabla f-\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}. ⟨ η n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν = ⟨ η n − ∇ f , ξ n ⟩ ν n + ( ⟨ ∇ f , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ ∇ f , ξ ν ⟩ ν ) + ⟨ ∇ f − η , ξ ν ⟩ ν .
The middle term equals − ∫ Δ f d ν n + ∫ Δ f d ν -\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}+\int\Delta f\,d\nu − ∫ Δ f d ν n + ∫ Δ f d ν by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score , applied at ν n \nu_{n} ν n and at ν \nu ν (the latter being legitimate by Step 3). By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Step 3, the last term is at most ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν C \lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}\sqrt{C} ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν C in absolute value, and the first term is at most C ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n \sqrt{C}\,\lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}} C ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n in absolute value.
We bound ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n \lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}} ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n along γ n \gamma_{n} γ n . On R d + d \mathbb{R}^{d+d} R d + d consider the nonnegative functions
F 1 ( w ) = ∥ η n ( p r 1 w ) − η ( p r 2 w ) ∥ , F 2 ( w ) = ∥ η ( p r 2 w ) − ∇ f ( p r 2 w ) ∥ , F 3 ( w ) = ∥ ∇ f ( p r 2 w ) − ∇ f ( p r 1 w ) ∥ , F_{1}(w)=\lVert\eta_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)-\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)\rVert,\quad F_{2}(w)=\lVert\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)-\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)\rVert,\quad F_{3}(w)=\lVert\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)-\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)\rVert, F 1 ( w ) = ∥ η n ( pr 1 w ) − η ( pr 2 w )∥ , F 2 ( w ) = ∥ η ( pr 2 w ) − ∇ f ( pr 2 w )∥ , F 3 ( w ) = ∥ ∇ f ( pr 2 w ) − ∇ f ( pr 1 w )∥ ,
and F 0 ( w ) = ∥ η n ( p r 1 w ) − ∇ f ( p r 1 w ) ∥ F_{0}(w)=\lVert\eta_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)-\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)\rVert F 0 ( w ) = ∥ η n ( pr 1 w ) − ∇ f ( pr 1 w )∥ . They are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (the projections being Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections , and ∇ f \nabla f ∇ f being Borel by Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §calculus ). Since ( p r 1 ) # γ n = ν n (\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu_{n} ( pr 1 ) # γ n = ν n and ( p r 2 ) # γ n = ν (\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu ( pr 2 ) # γ n = ν (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling ), the change-of-variables formula gives
∫ F 0 2 d γ n = ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n 2 , ∫ F 2 2 d γ n = ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν 2 , \int F_{0}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2},\qquad\int F_{2}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}^{2}, ∫ F 0 2 d γ n = ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n 2 , ∫ F 2 2 d γ n = ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν 2 ,
while ∫ F 1 2 d γ n = D γ n ( η n , η ) \int F_{1}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta) ∫ F 1 2 d γ n = D γ n ( η n , η ) by Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus , and, by Step 4 and the monotonicity of the integral (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral ) together with Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost ,
∫ F 3 2 d γ n ≤ L f 2 ∫ d T ( p r 1 w , p r 2 w ) 2 γ n ( d w ) = L f 2 I T ( γ n ) . \int F_{3}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}\le L_{f}^{2}\int d_{\mathbb{T}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w,\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw)=L_{f}^{2}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}). ∫ F 3 2 d γ n ≤ L f 2 ∫ d T ( pr 1 w , pr 2 w ) 2 γ n ( d w ) = L f 2 I T ( γ n ) .
So F 1 , F 2 , F 3 F_{1},F_{2},F_{3} F 1 , F 2 , F 3 belong to L 2 \mathcal{L}^{2} L 2 of the measure space ( R d + d , B ( R d + d ) , γ n ) (\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\gamma_{n}) ( R d + d , B ( R d + d ) , γ n ) (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space ). By the triangle inequality of the Euclidean norm, F 0 ≤ F 1 + F 2 + F 3 F_{0}\le F_{1}+F_{2}+F_{3} F 0 ≤ F 1 + F 2 + F 3 pointwise, so F 0 2 ≤ ( F 1 + F 2 + F 3 ) 2 F_{0}^{2}\le(F_{1}+F_{2}+F_{3})^{2} F 0 2 ≤ ( F 1 + F 2 + F 3 ) 2 , and by monotonicity of the integral and Minkowski's inequality with p = 2 p=2 p = 2 ,
∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n = ( ∫ F 0 2 d γ n ) 1 / 2 ≤ ∥ F 1 + F 2 + F 3 ∥ 2 ≤ D γ n ( η n , η ) 1 / 2 + ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν + L f I T ( γ n ) 1 / 2 . \lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}=\Bigl(\int F_{0}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}\Bigr)^{1/2}\le\lVert F_{1}+F_{2}+F_{3}\rVert_{2}\le D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)^{1/2}+\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}+L_{f}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})^{1/2}. ∥ η n − ∇ f ∥ ν n = ( ∫ F 0 2 d γ n ) 1/2 ≤ ∥ F 1 + F 2 + F 3 ∥ 2 ≤ D γ n ( η n , η ) 1/2 + ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν + L f I T ( γ n ) 1/2 .
Collecting the three terms, for every f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ and every n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N ,
∣ ⟨ η n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν ∣ ≤ C ( D γ n ( η n , η ) 1 / 2 + L f I T ( γ n ) 1 / 2 ) + 2 C ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν + ∣ ∫ Δ f d ν n − ∫ Δ f d ν ∣ . \bigl|\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}\bigr|\le\sqrt{C}\Bigl(D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)^{1/2}+L_{f}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})^{1/2}\Bigr)+2\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}+\Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}-\int\Delta f\,d\nu\Bigr|. ⟨ η n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν ≤ C ( D γ n ( η n , η ) 1/2 + L f I T ( γ n ) 1/2 ) + 2 C ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν + ∫ Δ f d ν n − ∫ Δ f d ν .
Step 6 (claim 2: order of choices). Let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 be given, and put δ = ε / ( 4 C + 2 ) > 0 \delta=\varepsilon/(4\sqrt{C}+2)>0 δ = ε / ( 4 C + 2 ) > 0 . First, since η ∈ T ν \eta\in T_{\nu} η ∈ T ν , the closure of G ν G_{\nu} G ν in L 2 ( ν ; R d ) L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( ν ; R d ) (The Tangent Space of the Torus Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent ), Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls (claim 3, for the metric of the norm ∥ ⋅ ∥ ν \lVert\cdot\rVert_{\nu} ∥ ⋅ ∥ ν ) and The Tangent Space of the Torus Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §gradients provide f ∈ C p e r ∞ f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} f ∈ C per ∞ with ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν < δ \lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}<\delta ∥ η − ∇ f ∥ ν < δ . Second, with this f f f fixed, L f L_{f} L f is fixed by Step 4. Third, since D γ n ( η n , η ) → 0 D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)\to0 D γ n ( η n , η ) → 0 , I T ( γ n ) → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0 I T ( γ n ) → 0 and, by Step 2, ∫ Δ f d ν n → ∫ Δ f d ν \int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}\to\int\Delta f\,d\nu ∫ Δ f d ν n → ∫ Δ f d ν , and since the square root is continuous at 0 0 0 (Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity , with t 1 / 2 = t t^{1/2}=\sqrt{t} t 1/2 = t by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement ), there is N ∈ N N\in\mathbb{N} N ∈ N such that for every n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N
D γ n ( η n , η ) 1 / 2 ≤ δ , L f I T ( γ n ) 1 / 2 ≤ δ , ∣ ∫ Δ f d ν n − ∫ Δ f d ν ∣ ≤ δ . D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)^{1/2}\le\delta,\qquad L_{f}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})^{1/2}\le\delta,\qquad\Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}-\int\Delta f\,d\nu\Bigr|\le\delta. D γ n ( η n , η ) 1/2 ≤ δ , L f I T ( γ n ) 1/2 ≤ δ , ∫ Δ f d ν n − ∫ Δ f d ν ≤ δ .
By Step 5, for every n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N ,
∣ ⟨ η n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν ∣ ≤ C ( δ + δ ) + 2 C δ + δ = ( 4 C + 1 ) δ < ε . \bigl|\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}\bigr|\le\sqrt{C}(\delta+\delta)+2\sqrt{C}\,\delta+\delta=(4\sqrt{C}+1)\,\delta<\varepsilon. ⟨ η n , ξ n ⟩ ν n − ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν ≤ C ( δ + δ ) + 2 C δ + δ = ( 4 C + 1 ) δ < ε .
As ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 was arbitrary, the real sequence ( ⟨ η n , ξ ν n ⟩ ν n ) n ∈ N (\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{\nu_{n}}\rangle_{\nu_{n}})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} (⟨ η n , ξ ν n ⟩ ν n ) n ∈ N converges to ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν \langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu} ⟨ η , ξ ν ⟩ ν . This proves claim 2.