TheoremBase

Pass to the limit in the Cauchy-Schwarz bound for the score pairing with smooth periodic gradients, then approximate the tangent field by a smooth gradient and transport the error along the couplings using the torus Lipschitz bound of that gradient.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, ξn\xi_{n} abbreviates ξνn\xi_{\nu_{n}}. Fixing any n0∈Nn_{0}\in\mathbb{N}, one has 0≤∥ξn0∥νn02=I(νn0)≤C0\le\lVert\xi_{n_{0}}\rVert_{\nu_{n_{0}}}^{2}=\mathcal{I}(\nu_{n_{0}})\le C by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information, so C≥0C\ge0 and C\sqrt{C} is defined; and ∥ξn∥νn=I(νn)≤C\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}=\sqrt{\mathcal{I}(\nu_{n})}\le\sqrt{C} for every nn. For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) the space L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is a real inner product space with norm ∥⋅∥μ\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product (see Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields), so the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality ∣⟨α,β⟩μ∣≤∥α∥μ∥β∥μ|\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle_{\mu}|\le\lVert\alpha\rVert_{\mu}\lVert\beta\rVert_{\mu} holds in it. Since (νn)(\nu_{n}) converges to ν\nu in (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}), the real sequence (WT(νn,ν))n∈N(W_{\mathbb{T}}(\nu_{n},\nu))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00.

Step 1 (a Lipschitz bound in the torus distance). Let u∈Cper1u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}. We show that there is a real Lu≥0L_{u}\ge0 with ∣u(y)−u(x)∣≤Lu dT(x,y)|u(y)-u(x)|\le L_{u}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) for all x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. For each i∈[d]i\in[d] the function ∂iu\partial_{i}u belongs to CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative, so there is a real Mi≥0M_{i}\ge0 with ∣∂iu∣≤Mi|\partial_{i}u|\le M_{i} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §bounded; put Lu=M1+⋯+MdL_{u}=M_{1}+\dots+M_{d}. Let x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, put v=ϖ(y−x)v=\varpi(y-x) and z=x+vz=x+v. By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range, y−z=(y−x)−ϖ(y−x)∈Zdy-z=(y-x)-\varpi(y-x)\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}, so u(y)=u(z)u(y)=u(z) by the periodicity of uu; and ∥v∥=dT(x,y)\lVert v\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y) by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance. If v=0v=0, then u(y)=u(x)u(y)=u(x) and there is nothing to prove. Otherwise let F:[0,1]→RF:[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}, F(τ)=u(x+τv)F(\tau)=u(x+\tau v). Since Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is open (claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous) and uu is of class C1C^{1} on it, Derivatives Along a Segment for C^1 Functions on a Euclidean Open Set (claims 2 and 3, with J=[0,1]J=[0,1]) shows that FF is continuous on [0,1][0,1] and differentiable at every τ∈(0,1)\tau\in(0,1) with F′(τ)=∑i=1d∂iu(x+τv) viF'(\tau)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}u(x+\tau v)\,v_{i}. By the mean value theorem there is c∈(0,1)c\in(0,1) with u(z)−u(x)=F(1)−F(0)=F′(c)u(z)-u(x)=F(1)-F(0)=F'(c), whence

∣u(y)−u(x)∣=∣F′(c)∣≤∑i=1dMi ∣vi∣≤Lu∥v∥=Lu dT(x,y).|u(y)-u(x)|=|F'(c)|\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}M_{i}\,|v_{i}|\le L_{u}\lVert v\rVert=L_{u}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y).

Step 2 (two limits for a fixed smooth periodic function). Let f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}. By Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §calculus, Δf\Delta f is continuous and periodic, that is, Δf∈Cper\Delta f\in C_{\mathrm{per}}. The partial derivatives ∂if\partial_{i}f belong to Cper∞C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative, hence to CperC_{\mathrm{per}} (a smooth map is of class C1C^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set, hence continuous by C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), so ∥∇f∥2=∑i=1d(∂if)2∈Cper\lVert\nabla f\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(\partial_{i}f)^{2}\in C_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §algebra. By The Torus Wasserstein Distance: Comparison with the Euclidean Distance, Wrapping, and Integrals of Periodic Functions §integrals, applied to these two functions,

∫Δf dνn→∫Δf dν,∥∇f∥νn2=∫∥∇f∥2 dνn→∫∥∇f∥2 dν=∥∇f∥ν2\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}\to\int\Delta f\,d\nu,\qquad\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2}=\int\lVert\nabla f\rVert^{2}\,d\nu_{n}\to\int\lVert\nabla f\rVert^{2}\,d\nu=\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}^{2}

as n→∞n\to\infty. Moreover, by the defining property of the score Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for every nn,

∣∫Δf dνn∣=∣⟨ξn,∇f⟩νn∣≤∥ξn∥νn∥∇f∥νn≤C ∥∇f∥νn.\Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}\Bigr|=|\langle\xi_{n},\nabla f\rangle_{\nu_{n}}|\le\lVert\xi_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}.

Step 3 (claim 1). Let f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}. By Step 2, ∣∫Δf dνn∣≤C (∥∇f∥νn2)1/2|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}|\le\sqrt{C}\,(\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2})^{1/2} for every nn; the left side converges to ∣∫Δf dν∣|\int\Delta f\,d\nu| and the right side to C ∥∇f∥ν\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}, by continuity of the absolute value (claim 4 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences) and of the square root on [0,∞)[0,\infty) (Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity, with t1/2=tt^{1/2}=\sqrt{t} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement), together with claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences for the factor C\sqrt{C}. Non-strict inequalities between terms of convergent real sequences pass to the limits (claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences), so

∣∫Δf dν∣≤C ∥∇f∥νfor every f∈Cper∞.\Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu\Bigr|\le\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}\qquad\text{for every }f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}.

Since C≥0\sqrt{C}\ge0, this says that ν∈PI(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §finite. Let ℓ(f)=−∫Δf dν\ell(f)=-\int\Delta f\,d\nu for f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}; as recorded in Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score, ℓ\ell is linear, and ∣ℓ(f)∣≤C ∥∇f∥ν|\ell(f)|\le\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\nabla f\rVert_{\nu} by the display. By The Torus Tangent Space: Linearity of the Periodic Calculus, Closed Subspace, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §representation, applied with the constant C\sqrt{C}, there is exactly one ζ∈Tν\zeta\in T_{\nu} with ⟨ζ,∇f⟩ν=ℓ(f)\langle\zeta,\nabla f\rangle_{\nu}=\ell(f) for every f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}, and ∥ζ∥ν≤C\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\nu}\le\sqrt{C}. The score ξν\xi_{\nu} lies in TνT_{\nu} and has the same property by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score, so ξν=ζ\xi_{\nu}=\zeta, and I(ν)=∥ξν∥ν2≤C\mathcal{I}(\nu)=\lVert\xi_{\nu}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}\le C by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §information. In particular ∥ξν∥ν≤C\lVert\xi_{\nu}\rVert_{\nu}\le\sqrt{C}.

Step 4 (set-up for claim 2). By convergence along couplings there are γn∈Π(νn,ν)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\nu) such that IT(γn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0 and Dγn(ηn,η)→0D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)\to0; fix them, together with Borel representatives of ηn\eta_{n} and η\eta. For f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} the components of ∇f\nabla f lie in Cper∞⊆Cper1C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}\subseteq C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} (Step 2), so by Step 1 there are reals L1,…,Ld≥0L_{1},\dots,L_{d}\ge0 with ∣∂if(y)−∂if(x)∣≤Li dT(x,y)|\partial_{i}f(y)-\partial_{i}f(x)|\le L_{i}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y); with Lf=L1+⋯+LdL_{f}=L_{1}+\dots+L_{d} this gives

∥∇f(y)−∇f(x)∥≤∑i=1d∣∂if(y)−∂if(x)∣≤Lf dT(x,y)(x,y∈Rd).\lVert\nabla f(y)-\nabla f(x)\rVert\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}|\partial_{i}f(y)-\partial_{i}f(x)|\le L_{f}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)\qquad(x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Step 5 (the estimate for a fixed smooth periodic function). Let f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By bilinearity of the inner products,

⟨ηn,ξn⟩νn−⟨η,ξν⟩ν=⟨ηn−∇f,ξn⟩νn+(⟨∇f,ξn⟩νn−⟨∇f,ξν⟩ν)+⟨∇f−η,ξν⟩ν.\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}=\langle\eta_{n}-\nabla f,\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}+\bigl(\langle\nabla f,\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\nabla f,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}\bigr)+\langle\nabla f-\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}.

The middle term equals −∫Δf dνn+∫Δf dν-\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}+\int\Delta f\,d\nu by Finite Torus Fisher Information, the Torus Score and the Torus Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Torus §score, applied at νn\nu_{n} and at ν\nu (the latter being legitimate by Step 3). By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Step 3, the last term is at most ∥η−∇f∥νC\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}\sqrt{C} in absolute value, and the first term is at most C ∥ηn−∇f∥νn\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}} in absolute value.

We bound ∥ηn−∇f∥νn\lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}} along γn\gamma_{n}. On Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} consider the nonnegative functions

F1(w)=∥ηn(pr1w)−η(pr2w)∥,F2(w)=∥η(pr2w)−∇f(pr2w)∥,F3(w)=∥∇f(pr2w)−∇f(pr1w)∥,F_{1}(w)=\lVert\eta_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)-\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)\rVert,\quad F_{2}(w)=\lVert\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)-\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)\rVert,\quad F_{3}(w)=\lVert\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)-\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)\rVert,

and F0(w)=∥ηn(pr1w)−∇f(pr1w)∥F_{0}(w)=\lVert\eta_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)-\nabla f(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w)\rVert. They are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (the projections being Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections, and ∇f\nabla f being Borel by Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §calculus). Since (pr1)#γn=νn(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu_{n} and (pr2)#γn=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling), the change-of-variables formula gives

∫F02 dγn=∥ηn−∇f∥νn2,∫F22 dγn=∥η−∇f∥ν2,\int F_{0}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2},\qquad\int F_{2}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}^{2},

while ∫F12 dγn=Dγn(ηn,η)\int F_{1}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta) by Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus, and, by Step 4 and the monotonicity of the integral (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral) together with Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost,

∫F32 dγn≤Lf2∫dT(pr1w,pr2w)2 γn(dw)=Lf2 IT(γn).\int F_{3}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}\le L_{f}^{2}\int d_{\mathbb{T}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}w,\mathrm{pr}_{2}w)^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw)=L_{f}^{2}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}).

So F1,F2,F3F_{1},F_{2},F_{3} belong to L2\mathcal{L}^{2} of the measure space (Rd+d,B(Rd+d),γn)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\gamma_{n}) (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space). By the triangle inequality of the Euclidean norm, F0≤F1+F2+F3F_{0}\le F_{1}+F_{2}+F_{3} pointwise, so F02≤(F1+F2+F3)2F_{0}^{2}\le(F_{1}+F_{2}+F_{3})^{2}, and by monotonicity of the integral and Minkowski's inequality with p=2p=2,

∥ηn−∇f∥νn=(∫F02 dγn)1/2≤∥F1+F2+F3∥2≤Dγn(ηn,η)1/2+∥η−∇f∥ν+Lf IT(γn)1/2.\lVert\eta_{n}-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu_{n}}=\Bigl(\int F_{0}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}\Bigr)^{1/2}\le\lVert F_{1}+F_{2}+F_{3}\rVert_{2}\le D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)^{1/2}+\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}+L_{f}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})^{1/2}.

Collecting the three terms, for every f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} and every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N},

∣⟨ηn,ξn⟩νn−⟨η,ξν⟩ν∣≤C(Dγn(ηn,η)1/2+Lf IT(γn)1/2)+2C ∥η−∇f∥ν+∣∫Δf dνn−∫Δf dν∣.\bigl|\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}\bigr|\le\sqrt{C}\Bigl(D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)^{1/2}+L_{f}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})^{1/2}\Bigr)+2\sqrt{C}\,\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}+\Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}-\int\Delta f\,d\nu\Bigr|.

Step 6 (claim 2: order of choices). Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be given, and put δ=ε/(4C+2)>0\delta=\varepsilon/(4\sqrt{C}+2)>0. First, since η∈Tν\eta\in T_{\nu}, the closure of GνG_{\nu} in L2(ν;Rd)L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (The Tangent Space of the Torus Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent), Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls (claim 3, for the metric of the norm ∥⋅∥ν\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\nu}) and The Tangent Space of the Torus Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §gradients provide f∈Cper∞f\in C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}} with ∥η−∇f∥ν<δ\lVert\eta-\nabla f\rVert_{\nu}<\delta. Second, with this ff fixed, LfL_{f} is fixed by Step 4. Third, since Dγn(ηn,η)→0D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)\to0, IT(γn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0 and, by Step 2, ∫Δf dνn→∫Δf dν\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}\to\int\Delta f\,d\nu, and since the square root is continuous at 00 (Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity, with t1/2=tt^{1/2}=\sqrt{t} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement), there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} such that for every n≥Nn\ge N

Dγn(ηn,η)1/2≤δ,Lf IT(γn)1/2≤δ,∣∫Δf dνn−∫Δf dν∣≤δ.D_{\gamma_{n}}(\eta_{n},\eta)^{1/2}\le\delta,\qquad L_{f}\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})^{1/2}\le\delta,\qquad\Bigl|\int\Delta f\,d\nu_{n}-\int\Delta f\,d\nu\Bigr|\le\delta.

By Step 5, for every n≥Nn\ge N,

∣⟨ηn,ξn⟩νn−⟨η,ξν⟩ν∣≤C(δ+δ)+2C δ+δ=(4C+1) δ<ε.\bigl|\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{n}\rangle_{\nu_{n}}-\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}\bigr|\le\sqrt{C}(\delta+\delta)+2\sqrt{C}\,\delta+\delta=(4\sqrt{C}+1)\,\delta<\varepsilon.

As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, the real sequence (⟨ηn,ξνn⟩νn)n∈N(\langle\eta_{n},\xi_{\nu_{n}}\rangle_{\nu_{n}})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ⟨η,ξν⟩ν\langle\eta,\xi_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}. This proves claim 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…