TheoremBase

Proof of Moments and Stability of the Standard Normal Distribution

lemmalem:gaussian-stability-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial published proof of the Gaussian moments and stability lemma; the bridge lemma it uses is now published. Approved by Aaron.

Proof

Throughout, g(x)=exp⁑(βˆ’x2/2)g(x)=\exp(-x^{2}/2) with the exponential function, Ξ»\lambda is Lebesgue measure, and N(B)=1c∫1B g dΞ»N(B)=\frac1c\int\mathbf{1}_B\,g\,d\lambda with c=∫g dλ∈(0,∞)c=\int g\,d\lambda\in(0,\infty) is the standard normal distribution, with cumulative distribution function Ξ¦\Phi; the needed properties of cc, NN, and Ξ¦\Phi are claims 1–3 of The Gaussian Weight Defines a Probability Distribution. From the series definition of exp⁑\exp: exp⁑\exp is positive and nondecreasing on R\mathbb{R} with exp⁑(s+t)=exp⁑(s)exp⁑(t)\exp(s+t)=\exp(s)\exp(t) and exp⁑′=exp⁑\exp'=\exp (claims of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), exp⁑(t)β‰₯t2/2\exp(t)\ge t^{2}/2 and exp⁑(t)β‰₯t4/24\exp(t)\ge t^{4}/24 for tβ‰₯0t\ge0 (single terms of the defining series, all of whose terms are nonnegative for tβ‰₯0t\ge0), and 0<g≀10<g\le1.

Preliminary (P1): densities. For every nonnegative Borel measurable h:R→Rh:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R},

∫Rh dN=1c∫Rh g dΞ».\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,dN=\frac1c\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,g\,d\lambda .

Standard machine, as in the proof of Change of Variables for Expectations: for indicators this is the definition of NN; it extends to nonnegative simple hh by linearity (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral); for general nonnegative hh, the dyadic staircase compositions Ο†L∘h\varphi_L\circ h increase to hh and (Ο†L∘h)g(\varphi_L\circ h)g increases to hghg pointwise, so Monotone Convergence Theorem on both sides concludes.

Preliminary (P2): affine changes of variable for Ξ»\lambda. Let T(x)=Ξ±x+Ξ²T(x)=\alpha x+\beta with Ξ±β‰ 0\alpha\neq0. From the Lebesgue outer measure via interval covers: images of intervals under TT are intervals with lengths multiplied by ∣α∣|\alpha|, so covers map to covers and Ξ»βˆ—(T(E))β‰€βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£Ξ»βˆ—(E)\lambda^{*}(T(E))\le|\alpha|\lambda^{*}(E); applying the same to Tβˆ’1T^{-1} gives equality, Ξ»βˆ—(T(E))=βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£Ξ»βˆ—(E)\lambda^{*}(T(E))=|\alpha|\lambda^{*}(E). Caratheodory measurability is preserved: for any test set AA,

Ξ»βˆ—(A∩T(E))+Ξ»βˆ—(Aβˆ–T(E))=∣α∣(Ξ»βˆ—(Tβˆ’1(A)∩E)+Ξ»βˆ—(Tβˆ’1(A)βˆ–E))=βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£β€‰Ξ»βˆ—(Tβˆ’1(A))=Ξ»βˆ—(A).\lambda^{*}(A\cap T(E))+\lambda^{*}(A\setminus T(E))=|\alpha|\bigl(\lambda^{*}(T^{-1}(A)\cap E)+\lambda^{*}(T^{-1}(A)\setminus E)\bigr)=|\alpha|\,\lambda^{*}(T^{-1}(A))=\lambda^{*}(A).

Since Borel sets are Lebesgue measurable and Tβˆ’1T^{-1} is again affine, Ξ»(Tβˆ’1(B))=βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£βˆ’1Ξ»(B)\lambda(T^{-1}(B))=|\alpha|^{-1}\lambda(B) for every Borel BB (Tβˆ’1(B)T^{-1}(B) is Borel because TT is continuous, so preimages of the generating open sets are open). By the standard machine again (indicators: ∫1B∘T dΞ»=Ξ»(Tβˆ’1(B))=βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£βˆ’1∫1B dΞ»\int\mathbf{1}_B\circ T\,d\lambda=\lambda(T^{-1}(B))=|\alpha|^{-1}\int\mathbf{1}_B\,d\lambda; simple functions; Monotone Convergence Theorem), for every nonnegative Borel hh,

∫Rh(Ξ±x+Ξ²) dΞ»(x)=1∣α∣∫Rh dΞ».\int_{\mathbb{R}}h(\alpha x+\beta)\,d\lambda(x)=\frac{1}{|\alpha|}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\lambda .

In particular (Ξ±=βˆ’1\alpha=-1, Ξ²=0\beta=0) reflection preserves all such integrals.

Step 1 (Claim 1). First, finiteness. For ∣x∣β‰₯4|x|\ge4 we have x2/2β‰₯2∣x∣x^{2}/2\ge2|x|, so by monotonicity and the product property of exp⁑\exp, together with exp⁑(s)β‰₯s4/24\exp(s)\ge s^{4}/24 (i.e. exp⁑(βˆ’s)≀24sβˆ’4\exp(-s)\le 24 s^{-4} for s>0s>0),

∣x∣3g(x)β‰€βˆ£x∣3exp⁑(βˆ’2∣x∣)=∣x∣3exp⁑(βˆ’βˆ£x∣)exp⁑(βˆ’βˆ£x∣)β‰€βˆ£x∣3β‹…24∣x∣4 exp⁑(βˆ’βˆ£x∣)≀6exp⁑(βˆ’βˆ£x∣).|x|^{3}g(x)\le|x|^{3}\exp(-2|x|)=|x|^{3}\exp(-|x|)\exp(-|x|)\le|x|^{3}\cdot\frac{24}{|x|^{4}}\,\exp(-|x|)\le6\exp(-|x|).

Also ∫Rexp⁑(βˆ’βˆ£x∣) dλ≀4\int_{\mathbb{R}}\exp(-|x|)\,d\lambda\le4: by (P2) with reflection, it is at most twice ∫[0,∞)exp⁑(βˆ’x) dΞ»\int_{[0,\infty)}\exp(-x)\,d\lambda; by Monotone Convergence Theorem along 1[0,L)exp⁑(βˆ’x)↑1[0,∞)exp⁑(βˆ’x)\mathbf{1}_{[0,L)}\exp(-x)\uparrow\mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}\exp(-x) and monotonicity on each [k,k+1)[k,k+1) (where exp⁑(βˆ’x)≀exp⁑(βˆ’k)\exp(-x)\le\exp(-k), a constant on an interval of length one), ∫[0,∞)exp⁑(βˆ’x) dΞ»β‰€βˆ‘kβ‰₯0exp⁑(βˆ’1)k=11βˆ’exp⁑(βˆ’1)≀2\int_{[0,\infty)}\exp(-x)\,d\lambda\le\sum_{k\ge0}\exp(-1)^{k}=\frac{1}{1-\exp(-1)}\le2, the geometric series bound using exp⁑(1)β‰₯2\exp(1)\ge2 (series) hence exp⁑(βˆ’1)≀1/2\exp(-1)\le1/2. On ∣x∣<4|x|<4, ∣x∣3g≀64|x|^{3}g\le64. Hence, splitting R\mathbb{R} into [βˆ’4,4][-4,4] and its complement (additivity via linearity applied to the two indicator pieces),

∫∣x∣3g dλ ≀ 64 λ([βˆ’4,4])+6β‹…4Β =Β 536<∞.\int|x|^{3}g\,d\lambda\ \le\ 64\,\lambda([-4,4])+6\cdot4\ =\ 536<\infty .

Since x2≀1+∣x∣3x^{2}\le1+|x|^{3} and ∣xβˆ£β‰€1+∣x∣3|x|\le1+|x|^{3} pointwise, the functions ∣x∣g|x|g, x2gx^{2}g, ∣x∣3g|x|^{3}g are all Ξ»\lambda-integrable, so by (P1) the functions ∣t∣|t|, t2t^{2}, ∣t∣3|t|^{3} are NN-integrable. By claims 1 and 2 of Change of Variables for Expectations (the maps tt, t2t^{2}, ∣t∣3|t|^{3} are continuous, hence Borel), ZZ, Z2Z^{2}, ∣Z∣3|Z|^{3} are integrable with E[Z]=∫t dN\mathbb{E}[Z]=\int t\,dN, E[Z2]=∫t2 dN\mathbb{E}[Z^{2}]=\int t^{2}\,dN.

E[Z]=0\mathbb{E}[Z]=0: writing t=t+βˆ’tβˆ’t=t^{+}-t^{-}, (P1) gives ∫t+dN=1c∫1(0,∞)(x) x g(x) dΞ»\int t^{+}dN=\frac1c\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,\infty)}(x)\,x\,g(x)\,d\lambda and ∫tβˆ’dN=1c∫1(βˆ’βˆž,0)(x)(βˆ’x)g(x) dΞ»\int t^{-}dN=\frac1c\int\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,0)}(x)(-x)g(x)\,d\lambda; the reflection xβ†¦βˆ’xx\mapsto-x of (P2) carries the second integrand into the first (gg is even), so the two are equal and finite, and their difference is 00.

E[Z2]=1\mathbb{E}[Z^{2}]=1: define A(x)=x g(x)A(x)=x\,g(x). For differentiable real functions the product rule (fg)β€²(x)=fβ€²(x)g(x)+f(x)gβ€²(x)(fg)'(x)=f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x) follows from the factorization f(x+s)g(x+s)βˆ’f(x)g(x)=(f(x+s)βˆ’f(x))g(x+s)+f(x)(g(x+s)βˆ’g(x))f(x+s)g(x+s)-f(x)g(x)=(f(x+s)-f(x))g(x+s)+f(x)(g(x+s)-g(x)) and limit arithmetic (Derivative at an Interior Point); and gβ€²(x)=βˆ’x g(x)g'(x)=-x\,g(x) by the one-dimensional chain rule applied to exp⁑\exp after the map xβ†¦βˆ’x2/2x\mapsto-x^{2}/2, using exp⁑′=exp⁑\exp'=\exp. Hence Aβ€²(x)=(1βˆ’x2)g(x)A'(x)=(1-x^{2})g(x), continuous, so AA is an antiderivative of (1βˆ’x2)g(1-x^{2})g on every [βˆ’L,L][-L,L], and Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II in One Dimension gives the Riemann integral βˆ«βˆ’LL(1βˆ’x2)g(x) dx=A(L)βˆ’A(βˆ’L)=2Lg(L)\int_{-L}^{L}(1-x^{2})g(x)\,dx=A(L)-A(-L)=2Lg(L). By Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval and linearity (all pieces integrable by the bounds above),

∫1[βˆ’L,L] g dΞ»βˆ’βˆ«1[βˆ’L,L] x2g dΞ»=2L g(L)(L∈N,Β Lβ‰₯1).\int\mathbf{1}_{[-L,L]}\,g\,d\lambda-\int\mathbf{1}_{[-L,L]}\,x^{2}g\,d\lambda=2L\,g(L)\qquad(L\in\mathbb{N},\ L\ge1).

As Lβ†’βˆžL\to\infty: 1[βˆ’L,L]g↑g\mathbf{1}_{[-L,L]}g\uparrow g and 1[βˆ’L,L]x2g↑x2g\mathbf{1}_{[-L,L]}x^{2}g\uparrow x^{2}g pointwise, so by Monotone Convergence Theorem the left side tends to cβˆ’βˆ«x2g dΞ»c-\int x^{2}g\,d\lambda; and 0≀2Lg(L)≀2Lβ‹…8/L4=16/L3β†’00\le 2Lg(L)\le2L\cdot 8/L^{4}=16/L^{3}\to0 using exp⁑(L2/2)β‰₯(L2/2)2/2=L4/8\exp(L^{2}/2)\ge(L^{2}/2)^{2}/2=L^{4}/8. Hence ∫x2g dΞ»=c\int x^{2}g\,d\lambda=c and E[Z2]=1cβ‹…c=1\mathbb{E}[Z^{2}]=\frac1c\cdot c=1 by (P1). Finally Var⁑(Z)=E[(Zβˆ’E[Z])2]=E[Z2]=1\operatorname{Var}(Z)=\mathbb{E}[(Z-\mathbb{E}[Z])^{2}]=\mathbb{E}[Z^{2}]=1 by Expectation, Variance, and Moments and E[Z]=0\mathbb{E}[Z]=0.

Step 2 (Claim 2). We use the vocabulary of Joint Distribution, Expectations, and Block Independence for Independent Random Variables. The map (x,y)↦ax+by(x,y)\mapsto ax+by is jointly Borel (claim 4: scalar multiples are Borel compositions of projections, sums of jointly Borel maps are jointly Borel), so aZ1+bZ2aZ_1+bZ_2 is a random variable, and by claims 1 and 2 there, with Ct={(x,y):ax+by≀t}C_t=\{(x,y):ax+by\le t\},

P(aZ1+bZ2≀t)=(NβŠ—N)(Ct)(t∈R).P(aZ_1+bZ_2\le t)=(N\otimes N)(C_t)\qquad(t\in\mathbb{R}).

By Tonelli and Fubini Theorems (Tonelli; NN is a probability measure, hence Οƒ\sigma-finite) and then (P1) twice with (P2),

(NβŠ—N)(Ct)=∫RN((βˆ’βˆž,tβˆ’bya])dN(y)=1c2β‹…1a∫R(∫R1(βˆ’βˆž,t](u) g(uβˆ’bya)dΞ»(u))g(y) dΞ»(y),(N\otimes N)(C_t)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}N\Bigl(\Bigl(-\infty,\tfrac{t-by}{a}\Bigr]\Bigr)dN(y)=\frac{1}{c^{2}}\cdot\frac1a\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,t]}(u)\,g\Bigl(\tfrac{u-by}{a}\Bigr)d\lambda(u)\Bigr)g(y)\,d\lambda(y),

where the inner rewriting used (P2) with the map u↦(uβˆ’by)/au\mapsto(u-by)/a (slope 1/a>01/a>0): ∫1{ax≀tβˆ’by}g(x) dΞ»(x)=1a∫1(βˆ’βˆž,t](u)g((uβˆ’by)/a) dΞ»(u)\int\mathbf{1}_{\{ax\le t-by\}}g(x)\,d\lambda(x)=\frac1a\int\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,t]}(u)g((u-by)/a)\,d\lambda(u); the map y↦N((βˆ’βˆž,(tβˆ’by)/a])=Ξ¦((tβˆ’by)/a)y\mapsto N((-\infty,(t-by)/a])=\Phi((t-by)/a) is Borel since Ξ¦\Phi is continuous (claim 3 of The Gaussian Weight Defines a Probability Distribution) and the composition is with an affine map. Since a2+b2=1a^{2}+b^{2}=1, expanding both sides of

(uβˆ’bya)2+y2=u2+(yβˆ’bua)2\Bigl(\frac{u-by}{a}\Bigr)^{2}+y^{2}=u^{2}+\Bigl(\frac{y-bu}{a}\Bigr)^{2}

(multiply by a2a^{2}; both sides become u2+y2βˆ’2buyu^{2}+y^{2}-2buy) and using exp⁑(s)exp⁑(t)=exp⁑(s+t)\exp(s)\exp(t)=\exp(s+t) gives the pointwise identity g(uβˆ’bya)g(y)=g(u) g(yβˆ’bua)g\bigl(\tfrac{u-by}{a}\bigr)g(y)=g(u)\,g\bigl(\tfrac{y-bu}{a}\bigr). The function (u,y)↦1(βˆ’βˆž,t](u) g(uβˆ’bya)g(y)(u,y)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,t]}(u)\,g\bigl(\tfrac{u-by}{a}\bigr)g(y) is nonnegative and B(R)βŠ—B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable: linear combinations of projections are jointly Borel, compositions with the continuous (hence Borel) maps gg and 1(βˆ’βˆž,t]\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,t]} preserve this (claim 4 of Joint Distribution, Expectations, and Block Independence for Independent Random Variables), and products of jointly Borel functions are jointly Borel since uv=((u+v)2βˆ’u2βˆ’v2)/2uv=((u+v)^{2}-u^{2}-v^{2})/2. So Tonelli permits interchanging the order of integration; using the pointwise identity and then (P2) with the map y↦(yβˆ’bu)/ay\mapsto(y-bu)/a,

(NβŠ—N)(Ct)=1c2β‹…1a∫1(βˆ’βˆž,t](u) g(u)(∫g(yβˆ’bua)dΞ»(y))dΞ»(u)=1c2β‹…1aβ‹…ac∫1(βˆ’βˆž,t]g dΞ»=Ξ¦(t).(N\otimes N)(C_t)=\frac{1}{c^{2}}\cdot\frac1a\int\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,t]}(u)\,g(u)\Bigl(\int g\Bigl(\tfrac{y-bu}{a}\Bigr)d\lambda(y)\Bigr)d\lambda(u)=\frac{1}{c^{2}}\cdot\frac1a\cdot ac\int\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,t]}g\,d\lambda=\Phi(t).

So the cumulative distribution function of aZ1+bZ2aZ_1+bZ_2 is Ξ¦\Phi. The distributions PaZ1+bZ2P_{aZ_1+bZ_2} and NN are probability measures agreeing on the closed rays (βˆ’βˆž,t](-\infty,t] and on R\mathbb{R}, which form a generating Ο€\pi-system of the Borel Οƒ\sigma-algebra (every open interval with rational endpoints arises from rays by countable set operations, and every open set is a countable union of such intervals by density of the rationals); the class where two probability measures agree contains R\mathbb{R} and is closed under proper differences and increasing countable unions, so Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem gives PaZ1+bZ2=NP_{aZ_1+bZ_2}=N, i.e. aZ1+bZ2aZ_1+bZ_2 is standard normal.

Step 3 (Claim 3). Induction on nn. For n=1n=1, 1=1\sqrt1=1 (uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root) and G1=Z1G_1=Z_1. Let nβ‰₯2n\ge2 and suppose the claim holds for nβˆ’1n-1. Given independent standard normal Z1,…,ZnZ_1,\dots,Z_n, the variable Gnβˆ’1=(Z1+β‹―+Znβˆ’1)/nβˆ’1G_{n-1}=(Z_1+\cdots+Z_{n-1})/\sqrt{n-1} is standard normal by the induction hypothesis (the first nβˆ’1n-1 variables form an independent family, immediately from Independence of Events and of Random Variables), and it is a jointly Borel function of (Z1,…,Znβˆ’1)(Z_1,\dots,Z_{n-1}) (claim 4 of Joint Distribution, Expectations, and Block Independence for Independent Random Variables), so Gnβˆ’1G_{n-1} and ZnZ_n are independent by claim 3 there (blocks {1,…,nβˆ’1}\{1,\dots,n-1\} and {n}\{n\}). Put Ξ±=(nβˆ’1)/n\alpha=\sqrt{(n-1)/n} and Ξ²=1/n\beta=\sqrt{1/n}, positive reals with Ξ±2+Ξ²2=1\alpha^{2}+\beta^{2}=1; by Step 2, Ξ±Gnβˆ’1+Ξ²Zn\alpha G_{n-1}+\beta Z_n is standard normal. Finally, Ξ±=nβˆ’1/n\alpha=\sqrt{n-1}/\sqrt{n} and Ξ²=1/n\beta=1/\sqrt{n} β€” in each case both sides are positive with equal squares, so they coincide by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root β€” whence

α Gnβˆ’1+β Zn=nβˆ’1nβ‹…Z1+β‹―+Znβˆ’1nβˆ’1+Znn=Z1+β‹―+Znn=Gn.β– \alpha\,G_{n-1}+\beta\,Z_n=\frac{\sqrt{n-1}}{\sqrt{n}}\cdot\frac{Z_1+\cdots+Z_{n-1}}{\sqrt{n-1}}+\frac{Z_n}{\sqrt{n}}=\frac{Z_1+\cdots+Z_n}{\sqrt{n}}=G_n. \qquad\blacksquare
Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…