TheoremBase

The weighted distances to the measures are bounded on Wasserstein balls, so both series converge and their tails are uniformly small; each property of an intrinsic test function then follows by applying the single-term result to a finite partial sum and controlling the remainder by the tail of the weights. The translated function is an explicit quadratic with Hessian twice the total weight times the identity.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary arithmetic and order of real numbers, finite sums of real numbers, square roots of nonnegative reals and the absolute value are used freely; they are carried by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background. For z∈Rd+dz\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d} we write x=pr1(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z) and y=pr2(z)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z), as in The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §couplings, and m(ρ)∈Rdm(\rho)\in\mathbb{R}^{d} is the mean of ρ\rho, that of The Mean of a Square-Integrable Probability Measure, Its Lift, Its Centring, and Functions of the Mean and Centred Integrals as Test Functions §mean. For ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) the second moment M2(ρ)M_{2}(\rho) is a nonnegative real number, being the integral of a nonnegative function (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment) and finite. Since 0≤M2(μ1)≤B0\le M_{2}(\mu_{1})\le B, the number BB is nonnegative, and for ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) we put

Rρ=M2(ρ)+B ≥0.R_{\rho}=\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho)}+\sqrt{B}\ \ge0 .

For K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} let σK=∑k=1Kck\sigma_{K}=\sum_{k=1}^{K}c_{k} be the KK-th partial sum of (ck)(c_{k}) (Series of Real Numbers §partial-sums) and rK=c−σKr_{K}=c-\sigma_{K}. Since 0<ck0<c_{k}, Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates gives 0≤σK≤c0\le\sigma_{K}\le c, so 0≤rK0\le r_{K}; also 0<c1=σ1≤c0<c_{1}=\sigma_{1}\le c, so cc is positive. By Series of Real Numbers §convergent the sequence (σK)K∈N(\sigma_{K})_{K\in\mathbb{N}} converges to cc, so by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar (its statement on differences, applied to the constant sequence cc minus (σK)(\sigma_{K})) the sequence (rK)K∈N(r_{K})_{K\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00; by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §products and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar so does (λ rK2)K∈N(\lambda\,r_{K}^{2})_{K\in\mathbb{N}} and (λ rK)K∈N(\lambda\,r_{K})_{K\in\mathbb{N}} for every real λ\lambda. Hence for every positive real δ\delta and every real λ\lambda there is K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} with λrK<δ\lambda r_{K}<\delta, and likewise with λrK2<δ\lambda r_{K}^{2}<\delta.

Step 1 (Elementary bounds). (i) For ρ,ρ′∈P2(Rd)\rho,\rho'\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and every π∈Π(ρ,ρ′)\pi\in\Pi(\rho,\rho'), W2(ρ,ρ′)≤I(π)W_{2}(\rho,\rho')\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}, by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

(ii) For ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, W2(ρ,μk)≤RρW_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})\le R_{\rho}. Indeed, by Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment there is π∈Π(ρ,μk)\pi\in\Pi(\rho,\mu_{k}) with I(π)=W2(ρ,μk)2I(\pi)=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2}. By The Coordinate Fields of a Coupling, and the Second Moment as a Lipschitz Function of the Wasserstein Distance §fields, read with m=dm=d, the coordinate projections define elements pr1,pr2\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2} of the real inner product space L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields, read with q=d+dq=d+d and r=dr=d) with ∥pr1∥π2=M2(ρ)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}\rVert_{\pi}^{2}=M_{2}(\rho), ∥pr2∥π2=M2(μk)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}^{2}=M_{2}(\mu_{k}) and ∥pr1−pr2∥π2=I(π)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}^{2}=I(\pi). All of these norms and W2(ρ,μk)W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}) are nonnegative, so by uniqueness of nonnegative square roots ∥pr1∥π=M2(ρ)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}\rVert_{\pi}=\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho)}, ∥pr2∥π=M2(μk)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}=\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu_{k})} and ∥pr1−pr2∥π=W2(ρ,μk)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}). The triangle inequality of The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle in L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) gives W2(ρ,μk)≤M2(ρ)+M2(μk)W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})\le\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho)}+\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu_{k})}, and M2(μk)≤B\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu_{k})}\le\sqrt{B} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, since M2(μk)≤BM_{2}(\mu_{k})\le B.

(iii) Let ρ,ρ′∈P2(Rd)\rho,\rho'\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) satisfy W2(ρ,ρ′)≤1W_{2}(\rho,\rho')\le1, and let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Then

W2(ρ′,μk)≤Rρ+1and∣W2(ρ′,μk)2−W2(ρ,μk)2∣≤(2Rρ+1) W2(ρ,ρ′).W_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k})\le R_{\rho}+1\qquad\text{and}\qquad\bigl|W_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k})^{2}-W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2}\bigr|\le(2R_{\rho}+1)\,W_{2}(\rho,\rho').

Indeed, by the triangle inequality and symmetry of W2W_{2} (The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §symmetry), W2(ρ′,μk)≤W2(ρ′,ρ)+W2(ρ,μk)W_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k})\le W_{2}(\rho',\rho)+W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}) and W2(ρ,μk)≤W2(ρ,ρ′)+W2(ρ′,μk)W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})\le W_{2}(\rho,\rho')+W_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k}). The first of these and (ii) give W2(ρ′,μk)≤1+RρW_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k})\le1+R_{\rho}, and together they give ∣W2(ρ′,μk)−W2(ρ,μk)∣≤W2(ρ,ρ′)|W_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k})-W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})|\le W_{2}(\rho,\rho'). Writing s=W2(ρ′,μk)s=W_{2}(\rho',\mu_{k}) and t=W2(ρ,μk)t=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}), both nonnegative, ∣s2−t2∣=∣s−t∣ (s+t)≤W2(ρ,ρ′) (Rρ+1+Rρ)|s^{2}-t^{2}|=|s-t|\,(s+t)\le W_{2}(\rho,\rho')\,(R_{\rho}+1+R_{\rho}).

Step 2 (Two facts on series). (T) Tail estimate. Let EE be a real inner product space with norm ∣⋅∣|\cdot|, let (xk)k∈N(x_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in EE whose series converges (Series in a Real Inner Product Space §convergent), with partial sums sns_{n} and sum xx, and let (bk)k∈N(b_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be real numbers with ∣xk∣≤bk|x_{k}|\le b_{k} for every kk whose series converges, with partial sums βn\beta_{n} and sum bb. Then ∣x−sK∣≤b−βK|x-s_{K}|\le b-\beta_{K} for every K∈NK\in\mathbb{N}. Proof: fix KK. We show ∣sK+n−sK∣≤βK+n−βK|s_{K+n}-s_{K}|\le\beta_{K+n}-\beta_{K} for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} by induction on nn. By the recursive definition of finite sums (Finite Sum Notation in a Vector Space, and The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §naturals for real numbers), sK+1−sK=xK+1s_{K+1}-s_{K}=x_{K+1} and sK+n+1−sK=(sK+n−sK)+xK+n+1s_{K+n+1}-s_{K}=(s_{K+n}-s_{K})+x_{K+n+1}, and similarly for β\beta; so the case n=1n=1 is the hypothesis ∣xK+1∣≤bK+1|x_{K+1}|\le b_{K+1}, and the inductive step follows from the triangle inequality of The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle and the hypothesis ∣xK+n+1∣≤bK+n+1|x_{K+n+1}|\le b_{K+n+1}. Since 0≤∣xk∣≤bk0\le|x_{k}|\le b_{k}, Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates gives βK+n≤b\beta_{K+n}\le b, whence ∣sK+n−sK∣≤b−βK|s_{K+n}-s_{K}|\le b-\beta_{K} for every nn. The sequence (sK+n)n∈N(s_{K+n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to xx, because K+n≥nK+n\ge n and (sn)(s_{n}) converges to xx; so (sK+n−sK)n(s_{K+n}-s_{K})_{n} converges to x−sKx-s_{K} by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §linear-limits, and (∣sK+n−sK∣)n(|s_{K+n}-s_{K}|)_{n} converges to ∣x−sK∣|x-s_{K}| by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity. Claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, applied with the constant sequence b−βKb-\beta_{K}, gives ∣x−sK∣≤b−βK|x-s_{K}|\le b-\beta_{K}. We use (T) for E=L2(ρ;Rd)E=L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and for E=RE=\mathbb{R}, the latter being the real inner product space of Elementary Properties of Bounded Linear Maps and Functionals on Real Inner Product Spaces §real-line with norm the absolute value, in which convergence of a series and its partial sums and sum agree with those of Series of Real Numbers by Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space §real-line.

(S) Signed comparison. Let (ak)(a_{k}) and (bk)(b_{k}) be real sequences with ∣ak∣≤bk|a_{k}|\le b_{k} for every kk such that ∑k=1∞bk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}b_{k} converges with sum bb. Then ∑k=1∞ak\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k} converges and ∣∑k=1∞ak∣≤b|\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}|\le b. Proof: 0≤ak+bk≤2bk0\le a_{k}+b_{k}\le2b_{k}, and ∑k2bk\sum_{k}2b_{k} converges by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, so ∑k(ak+bk)\sum_{k}(a_{k}+b_{k}) converges by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison; then ∑kak=∑k((ak+bk)+(−1)bk)\sum_{k}a_{k}=\sum_{k}\bigl((a_{k}+b_{k})+(-1)b_{k}\bigr) converges by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity. As ak≤bka_{k}\le b_{k} and −ak≤bk-a_{k}\le b_{k}, and ∑k(−ak)=−∑kak\sum_{k}(-a_{k})=-\sum_{k}a_{k} by the same clause, Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §order gives ∑kak≤b\sum_{k}a_{k}\le b and −∑kak≤b-\sum_{k}a_{k}\le b.

Step 3 (Clause 1). Let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). For every kk, 0≤W2(μ,μk)≤Rμ0\le W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k})\le R_{\mu} by Step 1(ii), hence 0≤W2(μ,μk)2≤Rμ20\le W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k})^{2}\le R_{\mu}^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. By Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §tail-bound, read with (ck)(c_{k}) in place of its (μk)(\mu_{k}), with M=RμM=R_{\mu} and wk=W2(μ,μk)w_{k}=W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k}), and again with M=Rμ2M=R_{\mu}^{2} and wk=W2(μ,μk)2w_{k}=W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k})^{2}, both series of clause 1 converge. So ψ\psi is well defined. For K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} let ψK:P2(Rd)→R\psi_{K}:\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R}, ψK(ρ)=∑k=1KckW2(ρ,μk)2\psi_{K}(\rho)=\sum_{k=1}^{K}c_{k}W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2}, be the KK-th partial sum of the series defining ψ(ρ)\psi(\rho).

Step 4 (Property (a): continuity). Let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Put δ=min⁡{1,ε (c (2Rμ+1))−1}\delta=\min\{1,\varepsilon\,(c\,(2R_{\mu}+1))^{-1}\}, which is positive. Let ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) satisfy W2(μ,ν)<δW_{2}(\mu,\nu)<\delta, and put dk=W2(ν,μk)2−W2(μ,μk)2d_{k}=W_{2}(\nu,\mu_{k})^{2}-W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k})^{2}. By Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity the series ∑kckdk\sum_{k}c_{k}d_{k} converges with sum ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu). Since W2(μ,ν)≤1W_{2}(\mu,\nu)\le1, Step 1(iii) gives ∣ckdk∣≤ck(2Rμ+1)W2(μ,ν)|c_{k}d_{k}|\le c_{k}(2R_{\mu}+1)W_{2}(\mu,\nu), and the series of the right-hand sides converges with sum c (2Rμ+1)W2(μ,ν)c\,(2R_{\mu}+1)W_{2}(\mu,\nu) by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity. By Step 2(S),

∣ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)∣≤c (2Rμ+1) W2(μ,ν)<c (2Rμ+1) δ≤ε.|\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)|\le c\,(2R_{\mu}+1)\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu)<c\,(2R_{\mu}+1)\,\delta\le\varepsilon .

So ψ\psi is continuous at μ\mu, for the metric W2W_{2} and the absolute-value metric; as μ\mu was arbitrary, property (a) holds.

Step 5 (The candidate gradients). Let ρ∈Q\rho\in Q. By The Map Property of a Set of Probability Measures §map-property, for every kk the pair (ρ,μk)(\rho,\mu_{k}) is uniquely mapped; let SkρS^{\rho}_{k} be any optimal map from ρ\rho to μk\mu_{k}; then id−Skρ∈Tρ\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k}\in T_{\rho}. Put xkρ=2ck(id−Skρ)∈L2(ρ;Rd)x^{\rho}_{k}=2c_{k}(\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k})\in L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let sKρ=∑k=1Kxkρs^{\rho}_{K}=\sum_{k=1}^{K}x^{\rho}_{k} be its partial sums (Series in a Real Inner Product Space §partial-sums). Recall that L2(ρ;Rd)L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is a real Hilbert space (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields).

(i) ∥xkρ∥ρ=2ckW2(ρ,μk)\lVert x^{\rho}_{k}\rVert_{\rho}=2c_{k}W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}). Indeed ∥id−Skρ∥ρ2=W2(ρ,μk)2\lVert\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k}\rVert_{\rho}^{2}=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2} by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §cost, so ∥id−Skρ∥ρ=W2(ρ,μk)\lVert\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k}\rVert_{\rho}=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}) by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, both being nonnegative; and ∥λξ∥ρ=∣λ∣ ∥ξ∥ρ\lVert\lambda\xi\rVert_{\rho}=|\lambda|\,\lVert\xi\rVert_{\rho} by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §metric (with the zero vector as second point), with ∣2ck∣=2ck|2c_{k}|=2c_{k}.

(ii) The series ∑kxkρ\sum_{k}x^{\rho}_{k} converges in L2(ρ;Rd)L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}); we write ηρ\eta_{\rho} for its sum. Moreover ∥ηρ∥ρ≤2∑k=1∞ckW2(ρ,μk)\lVert\eta_{\rho}\rVert_{\rho}\le2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}). Indeed, by (i), Step 3 and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity the series ∑k∥xkρ∥ρ\sum_{k}\lVert x^{\rho}_{k}\rVert_{\rho} converges with sum 2∑kckW2(ρ,μk)2\sum_{k}c_{k}W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k}), so ∑kxkρ\sum_{k}x^{\rho}_{k} converges absolutely, and Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space §absolute gives both assertions.

(iii) If M∈RM\in\mathbb{R} is nonnegative and W2(ρ,μk)≤MW_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})\le M for every kk, then ∥ηρ−sKρ∥ρ≤2M rK\lVert\eta_{\rho}-s^{\rho}_{K}\rVert_{\rho}\le2M\,r_{K} for every K∈NK\in\mathbb{N}. Indeed ∥xkρ∥ρ≤2Mck\lVert x^{\rho}_{k}\rVert_{\rho}\le2Mc_{k} by (i), the series ∑k2Mck\sum_{k}2Mc_{k} converges with sum 2Mc2Mc by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, its KK-th partial sum is 2MσK2M\sigma_{K}, and Step 2(T) in E=L2(ρ;Rd)E=L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) gives ∥ηρ−sKρ∥ρ≤2Mc−2MσK=2MrK\lVert\eta_{\rho}-s^{\rho}_{K}\rVert_{\rho}\le2Mc-2M\sigma_{K}=2Mr_{K}.

(iv) ηρ∈Tρ\eta_{\rho}\in T_{\rho}. By Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §closed, TρT_{\rho} is a closed linear subspace of L2(ρ;Rd)L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}). Each xkρx^{\rho}_{k} is a real multiple of id−Skρ∈Tρ\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k}\in T_{\rho}, hence lies in TρT_{\rho} (Linear Subspace); since s1ρ=x1ρs^{\rho}_{1}=x^{\rho}_{1} and sK+1ρ=sKρ+xK+1ρs^{\rho}_{K+1}=s^{\rho}_{K}+x^{\rho}_{K+1} (Finite Sum Notation in a Vector Space), induction on KK gives sKρ∈Tρs^{\rho}_{K}\in T_{\rho} for every KK. The sequence (sKρ)(s^{\rho}_{K}) converges to ηρ\eta_{\rho} (Series in a Real Inner Product Space §convergent) and TρT_{\rho} is closed in the sense of Real Hilbert Space §topology, so ηρ∈Tρ\eta_{\rho}\in T_{\rho} by Sequential Characterization of Closed Subsets of a Metric Space.

(v) For every K∈NK\in\mathbb{N}, ψK\psi_{K} is an intrinsic test function on QQ and ∇ψK(ρ)=sKρ\nabla\psi_{K}(\rho)=s^{\rho}_{K} for every ρ∈Q\rho\in Q. Indeed, for each kk the function φk(ρ)=W2(ρ,μk)2\varphi_{k}(\rho)=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2} is an intrinsic test function on QQ with ∇φk(ρ)=2(id−Skρ)\nabla\varphi_{k}(\rho)=2(\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k}) for ρ∈Q\rho\in Q, by The Squared Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure and Functions of the Mean are Intrinsic Test Functions §distance read with ν0=μk\nu_{0}=\mu_{k}. Now ψ1=c1φ1+0 φ1\psi_{1}=c_{1}\varphi_{1}+0\,\varphi_{1} and ψK+1=1 ψK+cK+1φK+1\psi_{K+1}=1\,\psi_{K}+c_{K+1}\varphi_{K+1} by the recursive definition of finite sums, so induction on KK with Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §linear shows that ψK\psi_{K} is an intrinsic test function on QQ with ∇ψK(ρ)=∑k=1Kck⋅2(id−Skρ)=sKρ\nabla\psi_{K}(\rho)=\sum_{k=1}^{K}c_{k}\cdot2(\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k})=s^{\rho}_{K}, the vector-space axioms of L2(ρ;Rd)L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) giving ck⋅2(id−Skρ)=xkρc_{k}\cdot2(\mathrm{id}-S^{\rho}_{k})=x^{\rho}_{k}.

Step 6 (Property (b), and clause 3). Let μ∈Q\mu\in Q, let Sk=SkμS_{k}=S^{\mu}_{k} be the optimal maps chosen in Step 5 (an arbitrary choice), and write η=ημ\eta=\eta_{\mu} and sK=sKμs_{K}=s^{\mu}_{K}. We show that ψ\psi is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient η\eta. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. The order of choice is: first KK, then θ1\theta_{1}, then θ\theta. Choose K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} with (4Rμ+1) rK<ε⋅2−1(4R_{\mu}+1)\,r_{K}<\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}, which is possible by the opening paragraph. By Step 5(v) and property (b) for ψK\psi_{K}, the function ψK\psi_{K} is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient sKs_{K} (Differentiability of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Along Couplings, and Its Gradient §gradient); choose a positive θ1\theta_{1} as in Differentiability of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Along Couplings, and Its Gradient §differentiable for ψK\psi_{K}, sKs_{K} and ε⋅2−1\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}, and put θ=min⁡{θ1,1}\theta=\min\{\theta_{1},1\}, which is positive.

Let ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and π∈Π(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) satisfy I(π)<θ2I(\pi)<\theta^{2}. As θ≤θ1\theta\le\theta_{1} and θ≤1\theta\le1, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives I(π)<θ12I(\pi)<\theta_{1}^{2} and I(π)<1I(\pi)<1, so I(π)<1\sqrt{I(\pi)}<1 by claim 1 of that lemma, and W2(μ,ν)≤I(π)<1W_{2}(\mu,\nu)\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}<1 by Step 1(i). Put dk=W2(ν,μk)2−W2(μ,μk)2d_{k}=W_{2}(\nu,\mu_{k})^{2}-W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k})^{2}.

First, the real tail. By Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity the series ∑kckdk\sum_{k}c_{k}d_{k} converges with sum ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu), and its KK-th partial sum is ψK(ν)−ψK(μ)\psi_{K}(\nu)-\psi_{K}(\mu). By Step 1(iii), applied with ρ=μ\rho=\mu and ρ′=ν\rho'=\nu (admissible as W2(μ,ν)≤1W_{2}(\mu,\nu)\le1), and Step 1(i), ∣dk∣≤(2Rμ+1)W2(μ,ν)≤(2Rμ+1)I(π)|d_{k}|\le(2R_{\mu}+1)W_{2}(\mu,\nu)\le(2R_{\mu}+1)\sqrt{I(\pi)}, so, as ck>0c_{k}>0, ∣ckdk∣≤ck(2Rμ+1)I(π)|c_{k}d_{k}|\le c_{k}(2R_{\mu}+1)\sqrt{I(\pi)}; the series of these bounds converges with sum c (2Rμ+1)I(π)c\,(2R_{\mu}+1)\sqrt{I(\pi)} and KK-th partial sum σK(2Rμ+1)I(π)\sigma_{K}(2R_{\mu}+1)\sqrt{I(\pi)}, by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity. Step 2(T) in E=RE=\mathbb{R} gives

∣(ψ(ν)−ψ(μ))−(ψK(ν)−ψK(μ))∣≤(2Rμ+1) rKI(π).\bigl|\bigl(\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)\bigr)-\bigl(\psi_{K}(\nu)-\psi_{K}(\mu)\bigr)\bigr|\le(2R_{\mu}+1)\,r_{K}\sqrt{I(\pi)} .

Second, the field tail. By The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §linear, J(η,π)=J(sK,π)+J(η−sK,π)\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi)=\mathcal{J}(s_{K},\pi)+\mathcal{J}(\eta-s_{K},\pi), and by The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §bound and Step 5(iii) with M=RμM=R_{\mu} (admissible by Step 1(ii)),

∣J(η−sK,π)∣≤∥η−sK∥μI(π)≤2Rμ rKI(π).\bigl|\mathcal{J}(\eta-s_{K},\pi)\bigr|\le\lVert\eta-s_{K}\rVert_{\mu}\sqrt{I(\pi)}\le2R_{\mu}\,r_{K}\sqrt{I(\pi)} .

Third, the head: ∣ψK(ν)−ψK(μ)−J(sK,π)∣≤ε⋅2−1I(π)|\psi_{K}(\nu)-\psi_{K}(\mu)-\mathcal{J}(s_{K},\pi)|\le\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}\sqrt{I(\pi)} by the choice of θ1\theta_{1}, since I(π)<θ12I(\pi)<\theta_{1}^{2}. Writing ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)−J(η,π)\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)-\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi) as the sum of the head expression, the real tail difference and −J(η−sK,π)-\mathcal{J}(\eta-s_{K},\pi), the triangle inequality for the absolute value gives

∣ψ(ν)−ψ(μ)−J(η,π)∣≤(ε⋅2−1+(4Rμ+1) rK)I(π)≤εI(π).\bigl|\psi(\nu)-\psi(\mu)-\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi)\bigr|\le\Bigl(\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}+(4R_{\mu}+1)\,r_{K}\Bigr)\sqrt{I(\pi)}\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I(\pi)} .

Hence ψ\psi is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient η\eta, and ∇ψ(μ)=η\nabla\psi(\mu)=\eta by the uniqueness in Differentiability of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Along Couplings, and Its Gradient §gradient. By Step 5(iv), ∇ψ(μ)∈Tμ\nabla\psi(\mu)\in T_{\mu}, so property (b) holds. Since the optimal maps SkS_{k} were arbitrary, this also proves clause 3: for any choice of optimal maps SkS_{k} from μ\mu to μk\mu_{k}, the series ∑k2ck(id−Sk)\sum_{k}2c_{k}(\mathrm{id}-S_{k}) converges in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (in the sense of series in that space) to ∇ψ(μ)\nabla\psi(\mu) by Step 5(ii), and ∥∇ψ(μ)∥μ≤2∑k=1∞ckW2(μ,μk)\lVert\nabla\psi(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}\le2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k}) by the same step.

Step 7 (Property (c)). Let μ∈Q\mu\in Q, let (ρn)n∈N(\rho_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in QQ, and let πn∈Π(ρn,μ)\pi_{n}\in\Pi(\rho_{n},\mu) with (I(πn))(I(\pi_{n})) converging to 00. For each nn fix the optimal maps SkρnS^{\rho_{n}}_{k} of Step 5, and write gn=∇ψ(ρn)=ηρng_{n}=\nabla\psi(\rho_{n})=\eta_{\rho_{n}} and g=∇ψ(μ)=ημg=\nabla\psi(\mu)=\eta_{\mu} (Step 6), and DnD_{n} for the discrepancy of gng_{n} and gg along πn\pi_{n}, a nonnegative real number by The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined. For K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} write hn,K=sKρn=∇ψK(ρn)h_{n,K}=s^{\rho_{n}}_{K}=\nabla\psi_{K}(\rho_{n}) and hK=sKμ=∇ψK(μ)h_{K}=s^{\mu}_{K}=\nabla\psi_{K}(\mu) (Step 5(v)), and Dn,KD_{n,K} for the discrepancy of hn,Kh_{n,K} and hKh_{K} along πn\pi_{n}.

Comparison. Fix nn and KK. Choose representatives of hn,Kh_{n,K}, v=gn−hn,Kv=g_{n}-h_{n,K}, hKh_{K} and w=g−hKw=g-h_{K}; by Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Coordinates, Operations, Almost Sure Equality and the Mean-Square Form §vector-space, applied on the probability spaces (Rd,B(Rd),ρn)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\rho_{n}) and (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu) as in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields, the pointwise sums hn,K+vh_{n,K}+v and hK+wh_{K}+w represent gng_{n} and gg, and the discrepancies do not depend on the representatives (The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined). For every zz, gn(x)−g(y)=(hn,K(x)−hK(y))+v(x)+(−1)w(y)g_{n}(x)-g(y)=\bigl(h_{n,K}(x)-h_{K}(y)\bigr)+v(x)+(-1)w(y), so by the triangle inequality and homogeneity of the Euclidean norm (Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §triangle, Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §homogeneity) and the real inequality (p+q+t)2≤3(p2+q2+t2)(p+q+t)^{2}\le3(p^{2}+q^{2}+t^{2}),

∥gn(x)−g(y)∥2≤3∥hn,K(x)−hK(y)∥2+3∥v(x)−0Rd∥2+3∥0Rd−w(y)∥2.\lVert g_{n}(x)-g(y)\rVert^{2}\le3\lVert h_{n,K}(x)-h_{K}(y)\rVert^{2}+3\lVert v(x)-0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\rVert^{2}+3\lVert0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}-w(y)\rVert^{2}.

The three functions on the right are nonnegative and Borel (The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined, with the zero fields of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and of L2(ρn;Rd)L^{2}(\rho_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}), of norm 00), so integrating against πn\pi_{n} by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, and bounding the last two discrepancies by The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined,

Dn≤3Dn,K+6∥gn−hn,K∥ρn2+6∥g−hK∥μ2.D_{n}\le3D_{n,K}+6\lVert g_{n}-h_{n,K}\rVert_{\rho_{n}}^{2}+6\lVert g-h_{K}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}.

Tails. Since (I(πn))(I(\pi_{n})) converges to 00, there is N0∈NN_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with I(πn)<1I(\pi_{n})<1 for n≥N0n\ge N_{0}. For such nn, W2(μ,ρn)=W2(ρn,μ)≤I(πn)≤1W_{2}(\mu,\rho_{n})=W_{2}(\rho_{n},\mu)\le\sqrt{I(\pi_{n})}\le1 by Step 1(i) and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, so W2(ρn,μk)≤Rμ+1W_{2}(\rho_{n},\mu_{k})\le R_{\mu}+1 for every kk by Step 1(iii); also W2(μ,μk)≤Rμ+1W_{2}(\mu,\mu_{k})\le R_{\mu}+1 by Step 1(ii). Step 5(iii) with M=Rμ+1M=R_{\mu}+1 at ρn\rho_{n} and at μ\mu gives ∥gn−hn,K∥ρn≤2(Rμ+1)rK\lVert g_{n}-h_{n,K}\rVert_{\rho_{n}}\le2(R_{\mu}+1)r_{K} and ∥g−hK∥μ≤2(Rμ+1)rK\lVert g-h_{K}\rVert_{\mu}\le2(R_{\mu}+1)r_{K}, whence by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field

Dn≤3Dn,K+48 (Rμ+1)2 rK2(n≥N0, K∈N).D_{n}\le3D_{n,K}+48\,(R_{\mu}+1)^{2}\,r_{K}^{2}\qquad(n\ge N_{0},\ K\in\mathbb{N}).

Conclusion. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. The order of choice is: first KK, then N1N_{1}. Choose KK with 48(Rμ+1)2rK2<ε⋅2−148(R_{\mu}+1)^{2}r_{K}^{2}<\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1} (opening paragraph). By Step 5(v), property (c) of the intrinsic test function ψK\psi_{K} on QQ, applied to μ\mu, (ρn)(\rho_{n}) and (πn)(\pi_{n}), shows that (Dn,K)n∈N(D_{n,K})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00, so there is N1N_{1} with 3Dn,K<ε⋅2−13D_{n,K}<\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1} for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} (Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar). For n≥max⁡{N0,N1}n\ge\max\{N_{0},N_{1}\} we get 0≤Dn<ε0\le D_{n}<\varepsilon. Hence (Dn)(D_{n}) converges to 00 and property (c) holds.

Step 8 (Properties (d) and (e), and clause 4). First a vector of weighted means. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and i∈[d]i\in[d], ∣m(μk)i∣≤∥m(μk)∥|m(\mu_{k})_{i}|\le\lVert m(\mu_{k})\rVert by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate, and ∥m(μk)∥2≤M2(μk)≤B\lVert m(\mu_{k})\rVert^{2}\le M_{2}(\mu_{k})\le B by The Mean of a Square-Integrable Probability Measure, Its Lift, Its Centring, and Functions of the Mean and Centred Integrals as Test Functions §mean, so ∥m(μk)∥≤B\lVert m(\mu_{k})\rVert\le\sqrt{B} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Thus ∣ckm(μk)i∣≤B ck|c_{k}m(\mu_{k})_{i}|\le\sqrt{B}\,c_{k}, and the series of the bounds converges by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity; by Step 2(S) the series ∑kckm(μk)i\sum_{k}c_{k}m(\mu_{k})_{i} converges, and we let p∈Rdp\in\mathbb{R}^{d} be the point with coordinates pi=∑k=1∞ckm(μk)ip_{i}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}m(\mu_{k})_{i}. For a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, the dot product being the finite sum of the products of coordinates (Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n), ck (a⋅m(μk))=∑i=1dai ckm(μk)ic_{k}\,(a\cdot m(\mu_{k}))=\sum_{i=1}^{d}a_{i}\,c_{k}m(\mu_{k})_{i}, so, by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity applied dd times (induction on the number of summands), the series ∑kck (a⋅m(μk))\sum_{k}c_{k}\,(a\cdot m(\mu_{k})) converges with sum ∑i=1daipi=a⋅p\sum_{i=1}^{d}a_{i}p_{i}=a\cdot p.

Let ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}; the maps τa\tau_{a} are the translations. The translation τ0Rd\tau_{0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}} is the identity map, so (τ0Rd)#μk=μk(\tau_{0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}})_{\#}\mu_{k}=\mu_{k} by the definition of push-forward in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, and The Squared Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure: a One-Sided Bound Along Couplings, Differentiability at a Uniquely Mapped Source, and the Translation and Centring Identities §translation, read with ρ\rho, μk\mu_{k}, aa and b=0Rdb=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} in place of its μ\mu, ν\nu, aa, bb, gives, since a−0Rd=aa-0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}=a and by claims 4 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

W2((τa)#ρ,μk)2=W2(ρ,μk)2+2 (a⋅m(ρ))−2 (a⋅m(μk))+∥a∥2.W_{2}\bigl((\tau_{a})_{\#}\rho,\mu_{k}\bigr)^{2}=W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2}+2\,\bigl(a\cdot m(\rho)\bigr)-2\,\bigl(a\cdot m(\mu_{k})\bigr)+\lVert a\rVert^{2}.

Multiplying by ckc_{k} and summing, the four series ∑kckW2(ρ,μk)2\sum_{k}c_{k}W_{2}(\rho,\mu_{k})^{2}, ∑kck⋅2(a⋅m(ρ))\sum_{k}c_{k}\cdot2(a\cdot m(\rho)), ∑k(−2) ck(a⋅m(μk))\sum_{k}(-2)\,c_{k}(a\cdot m(\mu_{k})) and ∑kck∥a∥2\sum_{k}c_{k}\lVert a\rVert^{2} converge with sums ψ(ρ)\psi(\rho), 2c (a⋅m(ρ))2c\,(a\cdot m(\rho)), −2 (a⋅p)-2\,(a\cdot p) and c∥a∥2c\lVert a\rVert^{2}, by Step 3, the previous paragraph and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity; by the same clause,

ϕρ(a)=ψ((τa)#ρ)=ψ(ρ)+2c (a⋅m(ρ))−2 (a⋅p)+c ∥a∥2.\phi_{\rho}(a)=\psi\bigl((\tau_{a})_{\#}\rho\bigr)=\psi(\rho)+2c\,\bigl(a\cdot m(\rho)\bigr)-2\,(a\cdot p)+c\,\lVert a\rVert^{2}.

Now ∥a∥2=a⋅a\lVert a\rVert^{2}=a\cdot a by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square, (2cId)a=2c (Ida)=2c a(2cI_{d})a=2c\,(I_{d}a)=2c\,a by claims 1 and 2 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, and a⋅(2c a)=2c (a⋅a)a\cdot(2c\,a)=2c\,(a\cdot a) by claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n; so c∥a∥2=12 a⋅((2cId)a)c\lVert a\rVert^{2}=\tfrac{1}{2}\,a\cdot\bigl((2cI_{d})a\bigr). With q=2c m(ρ)−2pq=2c\,m(\rho)-2p, claims 1 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n give 2c (a⋅m(ρ))−2 (a⋅p)=q⋅a2c\,(a\cdot m(\rho))-2\,(a\cdot p)=q\cdot a. Hence

ϕρ(a)=12 a⋅((2cId)a)+q⋅a+ψ(ρ)(a∈Rd).\phi_{\rho}(a)=\tfrac{1}{2}\,a\cdot\bigl((2cI_{d})a\bigr)+q\cdot a+\psi(\rho)\qquad(a\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).

The matrix 2cId2cI_{d} is symmetric, its entries being unchanged when the indices are interchanged, so it lies in S(d)\mathcal{S}(d). By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic, read in dimension dd with M=2cIdM=2cI_{d}, the vector qq above and the constant ψ(ρ)\psi(\rho) in place of its cc, the function ϕρ\phi_{\rho} is of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with D2ϕρ(a)=2cIdD^{2}\phi_{\rho}(a)=2cI_{d} for every aa. So property (d) holds, and D2ϕρ(0Rd)=2cIdD^{2}\phi_{\rho}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=2cI_{d} for every ρ∈P2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}).

For property (e), let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let ε\varepsilon be positive; put θ=ε\theta=\varepsilon. For every ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), D2ϕν(0Rd)−D2ϕμ(0Rd)=2cId−2cIdD^{2}\phi_{\nu}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})-D^{2}\phi_{\mu}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=2cI_{d}-2cI_{d} is the zero matrix 0d0_{d}, entrywise by Difference of Real Matrices, and ∥0d∥=0\lVert0_{d}\rVert=0 by claim 4 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix; so the distance in property (e) is 0<ε0<\varepsilon.

Conclusion. Steps 4, 6, 7 and 8 verify properties (a) to (e) of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §test, so ψ\psi is an intrinsic test function on QQ: this is clause 2. Clause 1 is Step 3 and clause 3 was proved in Step 6. Finally, for μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §hessian and Step 8 give Hψ(μ)=D2ϕμ(0Rd)=2c IdH_{\psi}(\mu)=D^{2}\phi_{\mu}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=2c\,I_{d}, which is clause 4.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…