TheoremBase

Regularity and the gradient follow from the chain rule; the density factors into one-dimensional Gaussians, whose integrals, second moments and tilted integrals are computed by scaling Lebesgue measure, and the d-dimensional values follow by Tonelli and induction on the dimension.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, λ\lambda denotes Lebesgue measure on the Borel sets of R\mathbb{R}; by Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (its case n=1n=1) it is λ1\lambda_{1}, and R\mathbb{R} is read as R1\mathbb{R}^{1} as in One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line. Points of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} are tuples, as in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces. A nonnegative Borel function into R\mathbb{R} is integrated as a [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued map, and a Borel f:Rm→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R} is integrable exactly when ∫∣f∣ dλm<∞\int|f|\,d\lambda_{m}<\infty, by Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable and Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral. By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling and The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density, ρc(x)=exp⁡(qc(x))\rho_{c}(x)=\exp(q_{c}(x)) with qc(x)=−Zc−∑i=1dxi2/(2ci)q_{c}(x)=-Z_{c}-\sum_{i=1}^{d}x_{i}^{2}/(2c_{i}), and κ\kappa is a positive real number with ∫Rψ dλ=κ\int_{\mathbb{R}}\psi\,d\lambda=\kappa, where ψ(s)=exp⁡(−s2/2)\psi(s)=\exp(-s^{2}/2), by claim 2 of The Gaussian Weight Defines a Probability Distribution. For a positive real vv write ev(s)=exp⁡(−s2/(2v))e_{v}(s)=\exp(-s^{2}/(2v)) for s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}; thus ψ=e1\psi=e_{1}.

Step 1 (Gaussian-type functions are smooth, positive and Borel). Let m≥1m\ge1, let w=(w1,…,wm)w=(w_{1},\dots,w_{m}) have positive entries and let b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R}. Put qw,b(y)=b+∑l=1m(−(2wl)−1)πl(y)πl(y)q_{w,b}(y)=b+\sum_{l=1}^{m}\bigl(-(2w_{l})^{-1}\bigr)\pi_{l}(y)\pi_{l}(y) for y∈Rmy\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, where πl(y)=yl\pi_{l}(y)=y_{l}, and Ew,b=exp⁡∘qw,bE_{w,b}=\exp\circ q_{w,b}. The sets Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} and R1\mathbb{R}^{1} are open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous (with n=mn=m and with n=1n=1). Constants and the coordinate functions πl\pi_{l} are smooth on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} by claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, so qw,bq_{w,b} is smooth by claim 3 there (applied finitely often to the products, scalar multiples and sums). By claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, exp⁡\exp is differentiable at every point with exp⁡′=exp⁡\exp'=\exp; hence the one-element set D={exp⁡}D=\{\exp\} satisfies the hypothesis of claim 3 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line, and exp⁡\exp is smooth on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} in the sense of Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set. By claim 3 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k (with U=RmU=\mathbb{R}^{m}, V=R1V=\mathbb{R}^{1}, F=qw,bF=q_{w,b}, G=exp⁡G=\exp), Ew,bE_{w,b} is smooth on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. It is positive by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. By claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous it is continuous from (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}) into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps.

For the partial derivatives, fix yy and i∈[m]i\in[m]. For every real h≠0h\ne0 the difference quotient of Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set for πl\pi_{l} at yy in the iith variable equals 11 if l=il=i and 00 if l≠il\ne i, and that of a constant equals 00; so ∂iπl(y)\partial_{i}\pi_{l}(y) is 11 or 00 accordingly and constants have partial derivative 00. By claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set (product, scalar-multiple and sum rules) ∂iqw,b(y)=−(2wi)−1⋅2yi=−yi/wi\partial_{i}q_{w,b}(y)=-(2w_{i})^{-1}\cdot2y_{i}=-y_{i}/w_{i}. Since qw,bq_{w,b} and exp⁡\exp are smooth, they are of class C1C^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set, so claim 1 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k gives ∂iEw,b(y)=∂1exp⁡(qw,b(y)) ∂iqw,b(y)\partial_{i}E_{w,b}(y)=\partial_{1}\exp(q_{w,b}(y))\,\partial_{i}q_{w,b}(y); and ∂1exp⁡(u)=exp⁡′(u)=exp⁡(u)\partial_{1}\exp(u)=\exp'(u)=\exp(u) by claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line and claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. Hence

∂iEw,b(y)=−yiwi Ew,b(y)(y∈Rm, i∈[m]).\partial_{i}E_{w,b}(y)=-\frac{y_{i}}{w_{i}}\,E_{w,b}(y)\qquad(y\in\mathbb{R}^{m},\ i\in[m]).

In particular (m=1m=1, w=(v)w=(v), b=0b=0) each eve_{v} is a positive Borel function on R\mathbb{R}, and s↦s2ev(s)s\mapsto s^{2}e_{v}(s) is Borel by claim 1 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets (the coordinate s↦ss\mapsto s is Borel, the σ\sigma-algebra there being B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 5) and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions.

Step 2 (Claims 1 and 2). With m=dm=d, w=cw=c (a variance vector, so ci>0c_{i}>0 by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §variances) and b=−Zcb=-Z_{c} we have qc=qc,−Zcq_{c}=q_{c,-Z_{c}} and ρc=Ec,−Zc\rho_{c}=E_{c,-Z_{c}}. Step 1 shows that ρc\rho_{c} is smooth, positive and Borel, which is claim 1. Being smooth, ρc\rho_{c} is of class C1C^{1}, and by Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives and Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set its gradient is Dρc(x)=(∂1ρc(x),…,∂dρc(x))D\rho_{c}(x)=(\partial_{1}\rho_{c}(x),\dots,\partial_{d}\rho_{c}(x)). By Step 1 the iith entry is −ρc(x) xi/ci-\rho_{c}(x)\,x_{i}/c_{i}, which is the iith entry of the scalar multiple −ρc(x)Sc(x)-\rho_{c}(x)S_{c}(x) of Sc(x)=(x1/c1,…,xd/cd)S_{c}(x)=(x_{1}/c_{1},\dots,x_{d}/c_{d}) (The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling). This is claim 2.

Step 3 (Factorization). Let w∈Rmw\in\mathbb{R}^{m} have positive entries and b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R}. Since qw,b(y)=b+∑i=1m(−yi2/(2wi))q_{w,b}(y)=b+\sum_{i=1}^{m}\bigl(-y_{i}^{2}/(2w_{i})\bigr), claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (exp⁡(u+u′)=exp⁡(u)exp⁡(u′)\exp(u+u')=\exp(u)\exp(u'), applied by induction on the number of summands) gives

Ew,b(y)=exp⁡(b)∏i=1mewi(yi).E_{w,b}(y)=\exp(b)\prod_{i=1}^{m}e_{w_{i}}(y_{i}).

Moreover, κci>0\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}}>0, so by claim 1 and claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function and the identity exp⁡(log⁡t)=t\exp(\log t)=t of The Natural Logarithm,

exp⁡(−Zc)=∏i=1dexp⁡(−log⁡(κci))=∏i=1d1κci.\exp(-Z_{c})=\prod_{i=1}^{d}\exp\bigl(-\log(\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}})\bigr)=\prod_{i=1}^{d}\frac{1}{\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}}} .

Hence, for every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d},

ρc(x)=∏i=1deci(xi)κci.(F1)\rho_{c}(x)=\prod_{i=1}^{d}\frac{e_{c_{i}}(x_{i})}{\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}}}.\tag{F1}

Now let tt be as in claim 5 and put ui=1−2tici>0u_{i}=1-2t_{i}c_{i}>0 and vi=ci/ui>0v_{i}=c_{i}/u_{i}>0. Since ti−1/(2ci)=−ui/(2ci)=−1/(2vi)t_{i}-1/(2c_{i})=-u_{i}/(2c_{i})=-1/(2v_{i}), we have ∑itixi2+qc(x)=qv,−Zc(x)\sum_{i}t_{i}x_{i}^{2}+q_{c}(x)=q_{v,-Z_{c}}(x) with v=(v1,…,vd)v=(v_{1},\dots,v_{d}), so by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function and the two displays above,

exp⁡(∑i=1dtixi2)ρc(x)=Ev,−Zc(x)=∏i=1devi(xi)κci.(F2)\exp\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{d}t_{i}x_{i}^{2}\Bigr)\rho_{c}(x)=E_{v,-Z_{c}}(x)=\prod_{i=1}^{d}\frac{e_{v_{i}}(x_{i})}{\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}}}.\tag{F2}

Step 4 (One-dimensional integrals). Let v>0v>0. We show

∫Rev dλ=κv,∫Rs2ev(s) λ(ds)=v κv.(F3)\int_{\mathbb{R}}e_{v}\,d\lambda=\kappa\sqrt{v},\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}}s^{2}e_{v}(s)\,\lambda(ds)=v\,\kappa\sqrt{v}.\tag{F3}

First, ∫Rs2ψ(s) λ(ds)=κ\int_{\mathbb{R}}s^{2}\psi(s)\,\lambda(ds)=\kappa. Indeed, apply The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §moments in dimension q=1q=1 with s=1s=1: for z∈R1z\in\mathbb{R}^{1} we have ∥z∥2=z2\lVert z\rVert^{2}=z^{2} by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square, so the kernel there is g1=k1ψg_{1}=k_{1}\psi with k1k_{1} (the normalizing constant written c1c_{1} in that lemma, renamed here to avoid a clash with the variance c1c_{1}) the unique positive real making ∫g1 dλ1=1\int g_{1}\,d\lambda_{1}=1; since ∫κ−1ψ dλ=κ−1κ=1\int\kappa^{-1}\psi\,d\lambda=\kappa^{-1}\kappa=1 by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, uniqueness gives k1=κ−1k_{1}=\kappa^{-1}. That clause gives ∫z2g1(z) dz=1⋅1=1\int z^{2}g_{1}(z)\,dz=1\cdot1=1 (the nonnegative function z↦z2g1(z)z\mapsto z^{2}g_{1}(z) being integrated as a [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued map, as fixed in the preamble of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails), and then ∫s2ψ(s) λ(ds)=∫κ s2g1(s) λ(ds)=κ\int s^{2}\psi(s)\,\lambda(ds)=\int\kappa\,s^{2}g_{1}(s)\,\lambda(ds)=\kappa by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative.

Next put r=(v)−1r=(\sqrt{v})^{-1}, a nonzero real with ∣r∣−1=v|r|^{-1}=\sqrt{v} and r2=1/vr^{2}=1/v. Apply claim 2 of Scaling of Lebesgue Measure and the Lebesgue Integral on Rn\mathbb{R}^n with n=1n=1 and the scalar written cc there equal to rr, first to the nonnegative Borel function ψ\psi (Step 1) and then to s↦s2ψ(s)s\mapsto s^{2}\psi(s) (Step 1). Since ψ(rs)=exp⁡(−s2/(2v))=ev(s)\psi(rs)=\exp(-s^{2}/(2v))=e_{v}(s) and (rs)2ψ(rs)=v−1s2ev(s)(rs)^{2}\psi(rs)=v^{-1}s^{2}e_{v}(s), we obtain ∫ev dλ=v κ\int e_{v}\,d\lambda=\sqrt{v}\,\kappa and ∫v−1s2ev(s) λ(ds)=v κ\int v^{-1}s^{2}e_{v}(s)\,\lambda(ds)=\sqrt{v}\,\kappa. Multiplying the latter integrand by the constant vv and using Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative gives the second identity in (F3).

Step 5 (Integrals of products of one-variable functions). Let m≥1m\ge1 and let h1,…,hm:R→Rh_{1},\dots,h_{m}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be nonnegative Borel functions with ai=∫Rhi dλ<∞a_{i}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{i}\,d\lambda<\infty. Put Hm(y)=∏i=1mhi(yi)H_{m}(y)=\prod_{i=1}^{m}h_{i}(y_{i}) for y∈Rmy\in\mathbb{R}^{m}. We show that HmH_{m} is Borel and ∫RmHm dλm=∏i=1mai\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}H_{m}\,d\lambda_{m}=\prod_{i=1}^{m}a_{i}. Each coordinate map y↦yiy\mapsto y_{i} is measurable for Bm=B(Rm)\mathcal{B}_{m}=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by claims 1 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, so y↦hi(yi)y\mapsto h_{i}(y_{i}) is Borel as a composition of Borel maps (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps) and HmH_{m} is Borel by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions.

We prove the integral formula by induction on mm. For m=1m=1, H1=h1H_{1}=h_{1} and λ1=λ\lambda_{1}=\lambda. Let m≥2m\ge2 and assume the formula in dimension m−1m-1. Identify Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} with Rm−1×R\mathbb{R}^{m-1}\times\mathbb{R} via (y1,…,ym)↔((y1,…,ym−1),ym)(y_{1},\dots,y_{m})\leftrightarrow((y_{1},\dots,y_{m-1}),y_{m}) as in Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l. Under this identification Bm=Bm−1⊗B(R)\mathcal{B}_{m}=\mathcal{B}_{m-1}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and the measure constructed there is λm−1⊗λ\lambda_{m-1}\otimes\lambda, the product of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure; by Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (with claim 1 of Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l and claim 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets) that measure is Lebesgue measure λm\lambda_{m} on B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}), and likewise the factor on Rm−1\mathbb{R}^{m-1} is λm−1\lambda_{m-1}. Both factors are σ\sigma-finite by claim 1 of Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l (with l=m−1l=m-1 and l=1l=1). Write y=(y′,ym)y=(y',y_{m}); then Hm(y′,ym)=Hm−1(y′) hm(ym)H_{m}(y',y_{m})=H_{m-1}(y')\,h_{m}(y_{m}), where Hm−1H_{m-1} is built from h1,…,hm−1h_{1},\dots,h_{m-1} and is Borel on Rm−1\mathbb{R}^{m-1} by the first paragraph. Since HmH_{m} is a nonnegative Bm−1⊗B(R)\mathcal{B}_{m-1}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable function, the Tonelli part of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems (with X=Rm−1X=\mathbb{R}^{m-1}, μ=λm−1\mu=\lambda_{m-1}, Y=RY=\mathbb{R}, ν=λ\nu=\lambda) gives

∫RmHm dλm=∫Rm−1(∫RHm−1(y′) hm(s) λ(ds))λm−1(dy′).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}H_{m}\,d\lambda_{m}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m-1}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}H_{m-1}(y')\,h_{m}(s)\,\lambda(ds)\Bigr)\lambda_{m-1}(dy').

For fixed y′y' the inner integral equals Hm−1(y′) amH_{m-1}(y')\,a_{m} by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative (constant factor Hm−1(y′)∈[0,∞)H_{m-1}(y')\in[0,\infty)), and by the same clause (constant factor am∈[0,∞)a_{m}\in[0,\infty)) and the induction hypothesis the outer integral equals am∏i=1m−1ai=∏i=1maia_{m}\prod_{i=1}^{m-1}a_{i}=\prod_{i=1}^{m}a_{i}.

Step 6 (Claim 3). By (F1), ρc=Hd\rho_{c}=H_{d} with hi=(κci)−1ecih_{i}=(\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}})^{-1}e_{c_{i}}, which is nonnegative and Borel by Step 1 and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, with ai=(κci)−1κci=1a_{i}=(\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}})^{-1}\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}}=1 by (F3) and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative. Step 5 gives ∫Rdρc dλd=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\rho_{c}\,d\lambda_{d}=1.

Step 7 (Claim 4). Fix j∈[d]j\in[d]. By (F1), xj2ρc(x)=Hd(x)x_{j}^{2}\rho_{c}(x)=H_{d}(x) with hih_{i} as in Step 6 for i≠ji\ne j and hj(s)=(κcj)−1s2ecj(s)h_{j}(s)=(\kappa\sqrt{c_{j}})^{-1}s^{2}e_{c_{j}}(s), which is nonnegative and Borel by Step 1 and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By (F3) and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, aj=(κcj)−1cjκcj=cja_{j}=(\kappa\sqrt{c_{j}})^{-1}c_{j}\kappa\sqrt{c_{j}}=c_{j}, and ai=1a_{i}=1 for i≠ji\ne j. Step 5 shows that x↦xj2ρc(x)x\mapsto x_{j}^{2}\rho_{c}(x) is a nonnegative Borel function with integral cj<∞c_{j}<\infty; hence it is integrable (Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral) with integral cjc_{j}. Here the integral of the integrable function is its [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued integral: for a nonnegative Borel ff with ∫f dλd<∞\int f\,d\lambda_{d}<\infty we have f+=ff^{+}=f and f−=0=0⋅ff^{-}=0=0\cdot f, so ∫f− dλd=0⋅∫f dλd=0\int f^{-}\,d\lambda_{d}=0\cdot\int f\,d\lambda_{d}=0 by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral shows that ff is integrable with integral ∫f+ dλd−0=∫f dλd\int f^{+}\,d\lambda_{d}-0=\int f\,d\lambda_{d}. Finally ∥x∥2=∑j=1dxj2\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{d}x_{j}^{2} by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square, so ∥x∥2ρc(x)=∑j=1dxj2ρc(x)\lVert x\rVert^{2}\rho_{c}(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{d}x_{j}^{2}\rho_{c}(x), and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, applied by induction on the number of summands, shows that this function is integrable with ∫Rd∥x∥2ρc(x) λd(dx)=∑j=1dcj\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\rho_{c}(x)\,\lambda_{d}(dx)=\sum_{j=1}^{d}c_{j}.

Step 8 (Claim 5). With uiu_{i} and viv_{i} as in Step 3, (F2) exhibits x↦exp⁡(∑itixi2)ρc(x)x\mapsto\exp(\sum_{i}t_{i}x_{i}^{2})\rho_{c}(x) as HdH_{d} with hi=(κci)−1evih_{i}=(\kappa\sqrt{c_{i}})^{-1}e_{v_{i}}, nonnegative and Borel as in Step 6. By (F3) and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, ai=vi/ci=1/uia_{i}=\sqrt{v_{i}}/\sqrt{c_{i}}=1/\sqrt{u_{i}}, because viui=viui=ci\sqrt{v_{i}}\sqrt{u_{i}}=\sqrt{v_{i}u_{i}}=\sqrt{c_{i}}. Step 5 shows that the function is nonnegative and Borel with integral ∏i=1dui−1/2\prod_{i=1}^{d}u_{i}^{-1/2}, where ui−1/2=1/uiu_{i}^{-1/2}=1/\sqrt{u_{i}}; being finite, it is integrable (Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral), and its integral as an integrable function is this same number, as observed in Step 7. It remains to identify the value. For u>0u>0 the number p=exp⁡(12log⁡u)p=\exp(\tfrac12\log u) is positive and satisfies p2=exp⁡(log⁡u)=up^{2}=\exp(\log u)=u by claims 1 and 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function and The Natural Logarithm, so p=up=\sqrt{u} by uniqueness of the nonnegative square root, and exp⁡(−12log⁡u)=1/u\exp(-\tfrac12\log u)=1/\sqrt{u} by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. Hence, by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function applied by induction on the number of summands,

exp⁡(−12∑i=1dlog⁡(1−2tici))=∏i=1dexp⁡(−12log⁡ui)=∏i=1d1ui,\exp\Bigl(-\tfrac12\sum_{i=1}^{d}\log(1-2t_{i}c_{i})\Bigr)=\prod_{i=1}^{d}\exp\bigl(-\tfrac12\log u_{i}\bigr)=\prod_{i=1}^{d}\frac{1}{\sqrt{u_{i}}},

which is the integral just computed. This proves claim 5.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…