Throughout, d d d is the Euclidean distance on R k \mathbb{R}^{k} R k , a metric by Euclidean Distance is a Metric on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , and we use the componentwise inequalities ∣ x i − y i ∣ ≤ d ( x , y ) ≤ ∑ l = 1 k ∣ x l − y l ∣ |x^{i}-y^{i}|\le d(x,y)\le\sum_{l=1}^{k}|x^{l}-y^{l}| ∣ x i − y i ∣ ≤ d ( x , y ) ≤ ∑ l = 1 k ∣ x l − y l ∣ of claim 1 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals (with d ( x , y ) = ∣ x − y ∣ d(x,y)=|x-y| d ( x , y ) = ∣ x − y ∣ as recorded there).
Claim 1. Fix h , h ′ ∈ C h,h'\in\mathcal{C} h , h ′ ∈ C . Each component h i − h ′ i h^{i}-h'^{i} h i − h ′ i is continuous on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] (by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space , applied first with the scalar − 1 -1 − 1 to make − h ′ i -h'^{i} − h ′ i continuous and then to the sum of h i h^{i} h i and − h ′ i -h'^{i} − h ′ i ), hence attains a maximum and a minimum by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space , the interval [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] being nonempty, since a < b a<b a < b , and a compact subset of the real line by Closed Interval [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] is Compact in R \mathbb{R} R ; with M i M_i M i denoting the larger of the absolute values of that maximum and minimum, ∣ h i ( t ) − h ′ i ( t ) ∣ ≤ M i |h^{i}(t)-h'^{i}(t)|\le M_i ∣ h i ( t ) − h ′ i ( t ) ∣ ≤ M i for all t ∈ [ a , b ] t\in[a,b] t ∈ [ a , b ] . Then d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ( t ) ) ≤ ∑ i M i d(h(t),h'(t))\le\sum_iM_i d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ( t )) ≤ ∑ i M i for all t t t , so the set of values is nonempty and bounded above, and the supremum exists by the least upper bound property ; d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) d_{\infty}(h,h') d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) is finite.
C \mathcal{C} C is nonempty (constant functions). The metric axioms: d ∞ ≥ 0 d_{\infty}\ge0 d ∞ ≥ 0 is clear; d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) = 0 d_{\infty}(h,h')=0 d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) = 0 forces d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ( t ) ) = 0 d(h(t),h'(t))=0 d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ( t )) = 0 for every t t t , hence h ( t ) = h ′ ( t ) h(t)=h'(t) h ( t ) = h ′ ( t ) for every t t t since d d d is a metric; symmetry is inherited from d d d ; and for h , h ′ , h ′ ′ ∈ C h,h',h''\in\mathcal{C} h , h ′ , h ′′ ∈ C and every t t t ,
d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ′ ( t ) ) ≤ d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ( t ) ) + d ( h ′ ( t ) , h ′ ′ ( t ) ) ≤ d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) + d ∞ ( h ′ , h ′ ′ ) , d\bigl(h(t),h''(t)\bigr)\le d\bigl(h(t),h'(t)\bigr)+d\bigl(h'(t),h''(t)\bigr)\le d_{\infty}(h,h')+d_{\infty}(h',h''), d ( h ( t ) , h ′′ ( t ) ) ≤ d ( h ( t ) , h ′ ( t ) ) + d ( h ′ ( t ) , h ′′ ( t ) ) ≤ d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) + d ∞ ( h ′ , h ′′ ) ,
so the right-hand side is an upper bound of the values and dominates their supremum: d ∞ ( h , h ′ ′ ) ≤ d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) + d ∞ ( h ′ , h ′ ′ ) d_{\infty}(h,h'')\le d_{\infty}(h,h')+d_{\infty}(h',h'') d ∞ ( h , h ′′ ) ≤ d ∞ ( h , h ′ ) + d ∞ ( h ′ , h ′′ ) .
Claim 2. Let ( h n ) n (h_n)_{n} ( h n ) n be a Cauchy sequence in ( C , d ∞ ) (\mathcal{C},d_{\infty}) ( C , d ∞ ) , and let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 be given. For every t ∈ [ a , b ] t\in[a,b] t ∈ [ a , b ] and every component i i i , ∣ h n i ( t ) − h m i ( t ) ∣ ≤ d ( h n ( t ) , h m ( t ) ) ≤ d ∞ ( h n , h m ) |h_n^{i}(t)-h_m^{i}(t)|\le d(h_n(t),h_m(t))\le d_{\infty}(h_n,h_m) ∣ h n i ( t ) − h m i ( t ) ∣ ≤ d ( h n ( t ) , h m ( t )) ≤ d ∞ ( h n , h m ) , so ( h n i ( t ) ) n (h_n^{i}(t))_n ( h n i ( t ) ) n is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers and converges by Every Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers Converges ; define h ( t ) h(t) h ( t ) componentwise as the limit .
Uniform estimate. Choose N N N with d ∞ ( h n , h m ) < ε / 2 d_{\infty}(h_n,h_m)<\varepsilon/2 d ∞ ( h n , h m ) < ε /2 for n , m ≥ N n,m\ge N n , m ≥ N . Fix t ∈ [ a , b ] t\in[a,b] t ∈ [ a , b ] and n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N . For every m ≥ N m\ge N m ≥ N ,
d ( h n ( t ) , h ( t ) ) ≤ d ( h n ( t ) , h m ( t ) ) + d ( h m ( t ) , h ( t ) ) ≤ ε 2 + ∑ i = 1 k ∣ h m i ( t ) − h i ( t ) ∣ , d\bigl(h_n(t),h(t)\bigr)\le d\bigl(h_n(t),h_m(t)\bigr)+d\bigl(h_m(t),h(t)\bigr)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}\bigl|h_m^{i}(t)-h^{i}(t)\bigr| , d ( h n ( t ) , h ( t ) ) ≤ d ( h n ( t ) , h m ( t ) ) + d ( h m ( t ) , h ( t ) ) ≤ 2 ε + i = 1 ∑ k h m i ( t ) − h i ( t ) ,
and the last sum tends to 0 0 0 as m → ∞ m\to\infty m → ∞ by componentwise convergence; hence d ( h n ( t ) , h ( t ) ) ≤ ε / 2 d(h_n(t),h(t))\le\varepsilon/2 d ( h n ( t ) , h ( t )) ≤ ε /2 . Since t t t was arbitrary, the set of values d ( h n ( t ) , h ( t ) ) d(h_n(t),h(t)) d ( h n ( t ) , h ( t )) (t ∈ [ a , b ] t\in[a,b] t ∈ [ a , b ] ) is bounded above by ε / 2 \varepsilon/2 ε /2 , for every n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N .
Continuity of the limit. Fix a component i i i , a point t ∈ [ a , b ] t\in[a,b] t ∈ [ a , b ] , and η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 . Apply the uniform estimate with ε \varepsilon ε replaced by a value making the bound at most η / 3 \eta/3 η /3 , obtaining n n n with d ( h n ( s ) , h ( s ) ) ≤ η / 3 d(h_n(s),h(s))\le\eta/3 d ( h n ( s ) , h ( s )) ≤ η /3 for all s ∈ [ a , b ] s\in[a,b] s ∈ [ a , b ] ; then choose δ > 0 \delta>0 δ > 0 from continuity of h n i h_n^{i} h n i at t t t with ∣ h n i ( s ) − h n i ( t ) ∣ < η / 3 |h_n^{i}(s)-h_n^{i}(t)|<\eta/3 ∣ h n i ( s ) − h n i ( t ) ∣ < η /3 for ∣ s − t ∣ < δ |s-t|<\delta ∣ s − t ∣ < δ , s ∈ [ a , b ] s\in[a,b] s ∈ [ a , b ] . Then for such s s s ,
∣ h i ( s ) − h i ( t ) ∣ ≤ ∣ h i ( s ) − h n i ( s ) ∣ + ∣ h n i ( s ) − h n i ( t ) ∣ + ∣ h n i ( t ) − h i ( t ) ∣ < η . |h^{i}(s)-h^{i}(t)|\le|h^{i}(s)-h_n^{i}(s)|+|h_n^{i}(s)-h_n^{i}(t)|+|h_n^{i}(t)-h^{i}(t)|<\eta . ∣ h i ( s ) − h i ( t ) ∣ ≤ ∣ h i ( s ) − h n i ( s ) ∣ + ∣ h n i ( s ) − h n i ( t ) ∣ + ∣ h n i ( t ) − h i ( t ) ∣ < η .
Hence h ∈ C h\in\mathcal{C} h ∈ C , so d ∞ ( h n , h ) d_{\infty}(h_n,h) d ∞ ( h n , h ) is defined, and the uniform estimate gives d ∞ ( h n , h ) ≤ ε / 2 < ε d_{\infty}(h_n,h)\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon d ∞ ( h n , h ) ≤ ε /2 < ε for all n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N : the sequence converges to h h h in ( C , d ∞ ) (\mathcal{C},d_{\infty}) ( C , d ∞ ) . Every Cauchy sequence converges, so ( C , d ∞ ) (\mathcal{C},d_{\infty}) ( C , d ∞ ) is complete . ■ \blacksquare ■