Β· 7,965 chars Β· 13 deps Β· depth 9 Reason: Initial publication of the proof that a C^1 map is differentiable: telescoping along coordinate segments, one mean-value point per coordinate, and an epsilon/n estimate against continuity of the partials. Step 3 now fixes the auxiliary radius once as rho=(r-||h||)/2 and derives the bound ||h||+rho<r on the distance from a of every point of the coordinate slice. Claim-9 references point at lem:absolute-value-properties-2026b.
As in earlier arguments we use that squares are strictly monotone on nonnegative reals: if 0β€Ξ±, 0β€Ξ² and Ξ±<Ξ², then 0<Ξ² by claim 2, so Ξ²Ξ±<Ξ²Ξ² by claim 10 and Ξ±Ξ±β€Ξ²Ξ±, whence Ξ±2<Ξ²2 by claim 2; consequently Ξ±β€Ξ² whenever Ξ±2β€Ξ²2. In particular β£ziββ£β€β₯zβ₯ for each i, since zi2ββ€β₯zβ₯2 and β£ziββ£2=zi2β by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.
Step 1 (a ball inside U). Since aβU and U is open, there is r with 0<r such that every point of Rn at Euclidean distance less than r from a lies in U.
Step 2 (telescoping). Let h=(h1β,β¦,hnβ)βRn with β₯hβ₯<r. Define points p0β,β¦,pnβ by p0β=a and pmβ=pmβ1β[m:amβ+hmβ] for mβ{1,β¦,n}, so that pmβ has lth coordinate alβ+hlβ for lβ€m and alβ for l>m; in particular pnβ=a+h.
More generally, for mβ{1,β¦,n} and u between amβ and amβ+hmβ inclusive, the point pmβ1β[m:u] differs from a only in coordinates lβ€m, by hlβ for l<m and by uβamβ for l=m, and β£uβamββ£β€β£hmββ£; so the square of its distance to a is at most βlβhl2β=β₯hβ₯2, whence that distance is at most β₯hβ₯<r and the point lies in U. In particular every pmβ lies in U, and
Step 3 (a mean value point in each coordinate). Fix m. If hmβ=0 then pmβ=pmβ1β and f(pmβ)βf(pmβ1β)=0=βmβf(qmβ)hmβ with qmβ=pmβ1β.
Suppose hmβξ =0. Since β₯hβ₯<r, claim 1 gives 0<rββ₯hβ₯, so by claim 8 the element Ο=(rββ₯hβ₯)β 2β1 satisfies 0<Ο and Ο+Ο=rββ₯hβ₯, that is β₯hβ₯+Ο+Ο=r; adding β₯hβ₯+Ο to 0<Ο gives β₯hβ₯+Ο<r, again by claim 1. Let J be the open interval consisting of those u with amββ(β£hmββ£+Ο)<u and u<amβ+(β£hmββ£+Ο).
Let uβJ. Adding βamβ to both inequalities, claim 1 gives β(β£hmββ£+Ο)<uβamβ and uβamβ<β£hmββ£+Ο, so β£uβamββ£<β£hmββ£+Ο by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. The point pmβ1β[m:u] agrees with a in the coordinates l>m and differs from it by hlβ in the coordinates l<m and by uβamβ in the coordinate m; hence the square of its Euclidean distance to a equals βl<mβhl2β+(uβamβ)2. Here βl<mβhl2ββ€β₯hβ₯2βhm2β, since the omitted terms hl2β with l>m are nonnegative, and (uβamβ)2=β£uβamββ£2β€(β£hmββ£+Ο)2 by claim 4 of that lemma and the monotonicity of squares. Moreover β£hmββ£Οβ€β₯hβ₯Ο: this is claim 10 when β£hmββ£<β₯hβ₯, and an equality when β£hmββ£=β₯hβ₯. Using β£hmββ£2=hm2β, again by claim 4, we get
By the monotonicity of squares the distance from pmβ1β[m:u] to a is therefore at most β₯hβ₯+Ο, hence less than r; so pmβ1β[m:u]βU for every uβJ.
Let G:JβR be given by G(u)=f(pmβ1β[m:u]). For each u0ββJ, apply Slice Function and the Partial Derivative to f at the point pmβ1β[m:u0β] of U in the mth variable: it gives a positive radius Ο0β and identifies the slice function on (u0ββΟ0β,u0β+Ο0β), which agrees with G there, as differentiable at u0β with derivative βmβf(pmβ1β[m:u0β]), the partial derivative existing because f is of class C1. By An Open Interval is an Interval All of Whose Points Are Interior both intervals have all points interior, so shrinking the Ξ΄ in the defining condition confines the increments to the overlap, where the two functions agree; hence G is differentiable at u0β with Gβ²(u0β)=βmβf(pmβ1β[m:u0β]).
Both amβ and amβ+hmβ lie in J: indeed 0β€β£hmββ£ and 0<Ο give 0<β£hmββ£+Ο and β£hmββ£<β£hmββ£+Ο by claim 1, so claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, applied to 0 and to hmβ with c=β£hmββ£+Ο, yields the two pairs of strict inequalities required. Applying Mean Value Theorem on an Open Interval to G on J with these two points in increasing order yields ΞΎmβ strictly between them with G(amβ+hmβ)βG(amβ)=Gβ²(ΞΎmβ)hmβ, that is, with qmβ=pmβ1β[m:ΞΎmβ],
f(pmβ)βf(pmβ1β)=βmβf(qmβ)hmβ.
Since β£ΞΎmββamββ£<β£hmββ£, Step 2 shows qmβ is at distance at most β₯hβ₯ from a.
Let Ξ΅βR with 0<Ξ΅. Since nβ₯1, the element n, a sum of copies of 1, is positive by claims 6 and 3, so Ξ΅β²=Ξ΅nβ1 is positive by claims 7 and 5. Each βmβf is continuous at a, by the definition of class C1; taking the least of the finitely many radii by repeated use of claim 9, there is ΞΈ with 0<ΞΈ such that every zβU at distance less than ΞΈ from a satisfies β£βmβf(z)ββmβf(a)β£<Ξ΅β² for every m.
Let Ξ΄ be the least, by claim 9, of r and ΞΈ, so 0<Ξ΄. Suppose hβRn satisfies 0<βiβhi2β<Ξ΄2 and a+hβU. Then β₯hβ₯<Ξ΄ by the monotonicity of squares, so β₯hβ₯<r and Steps 2 and 3 apply, and each qmβ is at distance at most β₯hβ₯<ΞΈ from a, so β£βmβf(qmβ)ββmβf(a)β£<Ξ΅β².
This is exactly the defining condition of differentiability of f at a, with m=1 there, the required partial derivatives existing because f is of class C1.