TheoremBase

A class orthogonal to the trigonometric system is orthogonal to every Fejer mean; approximating it by a continuous periodic function and that function by its Fejer means, Cauchy-Schwarz bounds the squared norm of the class by an arbitrarily small multiple of its norm, so the class is zero. Enumerating the system along any bijection then gives an orthonormal sequence with trivial orthogonal complement.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We use the notation of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation: the cell QQ, the class L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), the class map [ ⋅ ][\,\cdot\,], the periodic class CperC_{\mathrm{per}} and the restriction u∣Qu|_{Q}. Write ⟨ ⋅ ,⋅ ⟩\langle\,\cdot\,,\cdot\,\rangle and ∥ ⋅ ∥\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert for the inner product and norm of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}); by L²(μ) Is a Real Hilbert Space (i) this norm is the norm ∥ ⋅ ∥L2(Tn)\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert_{L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n})} of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iv), in which the bounds of Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus are stated. The exponent of Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus is p=2p=2 throughout, and for u∈Cperu\in C_{\mathrm{per}} and N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, σNu\sigma_{N}u is the Fejer mean of order NN of uu. For maps v,w:Rn→Rv,w:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}, v−wv-w denotes the pointwise sum v+(−1)wv+(-1)w of vv and the scalar multiple (−1)w(-1)w, formed as in Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions. The space L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is a vector space over R\mathbb{R}, as recorded in L²(μ) Is a Real Hilbert Space, and the identities of vector arithmetic used below, such as P−R=−(R−P)P-R=-(R-P), are elementary consequences of the conditions of that definition and of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, whose claims 1, 2 and 5 fix the zero vector 0L20_{L^{2}}, the difference P−R=P+(−R)P-R=P+(-R) and the identity (−1)R=−R(-1)R=-R.

Claim 1. Let U∈L2(Tn)U\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) satisfy ⟨U,Ek⟩=0\langle U,E_{k}\rangle=0 for every k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}. We show U=0L2U=0_{L^{2}}.

Step 1: UU is orthogonal to every Fejer mean. Let u∈Cperu\in C_{\mathrm{per}} and N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}. By The Fejer Means of a Continuous Periodic Function on the Torus (ii) and the hypothesis, ⟨U,[ (σNu)∣Q ]⟩\langle U,[\,(\sigma_{N}u)|_{Q}\,]\rangle is a sum over the nonempty finite set [2N+1]n[2N+1]^{n} of The Reproducing Identity for the Fejer Kernels of the Torus every one of whose summands is a product with the factor ⟨U,Ek(a)⟩=0\langle U,E_{k(a)}\rangle=0, hence equals 0=0⋅10=0\cdot1; so by claim 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set, applied with λ=0\lambda=0 to the constant map 11, the sum is 00 times a real number, hence 00, that is,

⟨U,[ (σNu)∣Q ]⟩=0.\bigl\langle U,[\,(\sigma_{N}u)|_{Q}\,]\bigr\rangle=0 .

Step 2: an estimate. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon. By The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (ii) the class UU is [f][f] for some f∈L2(Tn)f\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), so Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus (iv) furnishes u∈Cperu\in C_{\mathrm{per}} with ∥U−[ u∣Q ]∥≤ε\lVert U-[\,u|_{Q}\,]\rVert\le\varepsilon. By Uniform Convergence of the Fejer Means of a Continuous Periodic Function on the Torus (i), applied to uu and ε\varepsilon, there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣σNu(x)−u(x)∣≤ε|\sigma_{N}u(x)-u(x)|\le\varepsilon for every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. The maps σNu\sigma_{N}u and (−1)u(-1)u lie in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by The Fejer Means of a Continuous Periodic Function on the Torus (i) and Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions (i), hence so does v=σNu−uv=\sigma_{N}u-u, by the same clause; and ∣v(x)∣≤ε|v(x)|\le\varepsilon for every xx, so Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus (i), with M=εM=\varepsilon, gives ∥[ v∣Q ]∥≤ε\lVert[\,v|_{Q}\,]\rVert\le\varepsilon. Two applications of Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus (iii), first to the sum of σNu\sigma_{N}u and (−1)u(-1)u and then to the scalar multiple (−1)u(-1)u with c=−1c=-1, give [ v∣Q ]=[ (σNu)∣Q ]+(−1)[ u∣Q ]=[ (σNu)∣Q ]−[ u∣Q ][\,v|_{Q}\,]=[\,(\sigma_{N}u)|_{Q}\,]+(-1)[\,u|_{Q}\,]=[\,(\sigma_{N}u)|_{Q}\,]-[\,u|_{Q}\,].

Writing P=[ u∣Q ]P=[\,u|_{Q}\,] and R=[ (σNu)∣Q ]R=[\,(\sigma_{N}u)|_{Q}\,], one has U=(U−P)+(P−R)+RU=(U-P)+(P-R)+R in the vector space L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), so by the additivity of the inner product in its second argument, Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i), and Step 1,

∥U∥2=⟨U,U⟩=⟨U,U−P⟩+⟨U,P−R⟩+⟨U,R⟩=⟨U,U−P⟩+⟨U,P−R⟩,\lVert U\rVert^{2}=\langle U,U\rangle=\langle U,U-P\rangle+\langle U,P-R\rangle+\langle U,R\rangle=\langle U,U-P\rangle+\langle U,P-R\rangle,

the first equality being Real Inner Product Spaces (ii). By claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

⟨U,U−P⟩≤∣⟨U,U−P⟩∣≤∥U∥ ∥U−P∥≤∥U∥ ε,⟨U,P−R⟩≤∥U∥ ∥P−R∥≤∥U∥ ε,\langle U,U-P\rangle\le|\langle U,U-P\rangle|\le\lVert U\rVert\,\lVert U-P\rVert\le\lVert U\rVert\,\varepsilon, \qquad \langle U,P-R\rangle\le\lVert U\rVert\,\lVert P-R\rVert\le\lVert U\rVert\,\varepsilon,

where ∥P−R∥=∥−(R−P)∥=∥R−P∥=∥[ v∣Q ]∥≤ε\lVert P-R\rVert=\lVert-(R-P)\rVert=\lVert R-P\rVert=\lVert[\,v|_{Q}\,]\rVert\le\varepsilon by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv), and 0≤∥U∥0\le\lVert U\rVert by Real Inner Product Spaces (ii). Adding, by claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∥U∥2≤∥U∥ ε+∥U∥ ε=∥U∥ (2ε).\lVert U\rVert^{2}\le\lVert U\rVert\,\varepsilon+\lVert U\rVert\,\varepsilon=\lVert U\rVert\,(2\varepsilon).

Step 3: conclusion. Suppose, for a contradiction, that U≠0L2U\ne0_{L^{2}}. Then 0<∥U∥0<\lVert U\rVert by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii), so ∥U∥−1\lVert U\rVert^{-1} exists and is positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Take ε=∥U∥⋅2−1⋅2−1\varepsilon=\lVert U\rVert\cdot2^{-1}\cdot2^{-1}, which is positive by claims 8 and 5 of that lemma. Multiplying the estimate of Step 2 by ∥U∥−1\lVert U\rVert^{-1}, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives ∥U∥≤2ε=∥U∥⋅2−1\lVert U\rVert\le2\varepsilon=\lVert U\rVert\cdot2^{-1}, using ∥U∥−1∥U∥2=∥U∥\lVert U\rVert^{-1}\lVert U\rVert^{2}=\lVert U\rVert and 2⋅2−1=12\cdot2^{-1}=1. But ∥U∥⋅2−1<∥U∥\lVert U\rVert\cdot2^{-1}<\lVert U\rVert by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so claim 2 of that lemma gives ∥U∥<∥U∥\lVert U\rVert<\lVert U\rVert, which is impossible, since a<ba<b means a≤ba\le b together with a≠ba\ne b. Hence U=0L2U=0_{L^{2}}.

Claim 2. Let κ:N→Zn\kappa:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}^{n} be a bijection.

Orthonormality. Let i,j∈Ni,j\in\mathbb{N} with i≠ji\ne j. Then κ(i)≠κ(j)\kappa(i)\ne\kappa(j): otherwise the element κ(i)\kappa(i) of Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} would have the two distinct preimages ii and jj, contrary to Bijection of Sets. Hence ⟨Eκ(i),Eκ(j)⟩=0\langle E_{\kappa(i)},E_{\kappa(j)}\rangle=0 by The Trigonometric System on the Torus is Orthonormal (iii). Next let i∈Ni\in\mathbb{N}. The same clause gives ⟨Eκ(i),Eκ(i)⟩=1\langle E_{\kappa(i)},E_{\kappa(i)}\rangle=1, so ∥Eκ(i)∥\lVert E_{\kappa(i)}\rVert is the unique nonnegative real number whose square is 11 by Real Inner Product Spaces (ii); since 0≤10\le1 and 1⋅1=11\cdot1=1, this number is 11. Thus (Eκ(j))j∈N(E_{\kappa(j)})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} is an orthonormal sequence in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

Trivial orthogonal complement. Let x∈L2(Tn)x\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) satisfy ⟨x,Eκ(j)⟩=0\langle x,E_{\kappa(j)}\rangle=0 for every j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}. Let k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}. By Bijection of Sets there is j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N} with κ(j)=k\kappa(j)=k, so ⟨x,Ek⟩=0\langle x,E_{k}\rangle=0. Hence ⟨x,Ek⟩=0\langle x,E_{k}\rangle=0 for every k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}, and claim 1 gives x=0L2x=0_{L^{2}}. By Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space (i) the orthonormal sequence (Eκ(j))j∈N(E_{\kappa(j)})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} is an orthonormal basis of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…