TheoremBase

Every clause is reduced to finite sums over segments [n] and suprema of nondecreasing partial sums; the interchange of a double sum compares both iterated sums with the suprema of finite rectangle sums, and the bijection form compares them with finite pieces of the enumerated sum.

Proof

Throughout, the order of [−∞,∞][-\infty,\infty] is used through Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (i), and sums over finite sets of maps into [0,∞][0,\infty] lie in [0,∞][0,\infty] (Iterated Operations and Operations over Finite Sets Take Values in the Underlying Set (ii)). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, every element of [n][n] is a natural number by Elements of a Segment Are Natural Numbers, and Mixed Transitivity of the Order on the Natural Numbers (i), so [n]⊆N[n]\subseteq\mathbb{N}, and [n][n] is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vii). Write Σa=∑k∈Nak\Sigma a=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}a_{k} and Σb=∑k∈Nbk\Sigma b=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}b_{k}.

Step 0: three tools.

(S1) For a sequence (uk)(u_{k}) in [0,∞][0,\infty] and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, ∑k=1nuk=∑k∈[n]uk\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}=\sum_{k\in[n]}u_{k} by Natural Numbers as Indices: ℕ ⊆ ℕ₀, 1 ∈ ℕ₀, and the Two Readings of an Operation from 1 to n (iii), ++ being associative and commutative by Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (i). In particular sn=∑k∈[n]aks_{n}=\sum_{k\in[n]}a_{k}.

(S2) For every finite subset FF of N\mathbb{N} there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with F⊆[N]F\subseteq[N]. If F=∅F=\emptyset, take N=1N=1. Otherwise, the order of N0\mathbb{N}_{0} is a well-order, hence a total order (The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion (v)), and F⊆N⊆N0F\subseteq\mathbb{N}\subseteq\mathbb{N}_{0}; so FF has a greatest element NN by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (viii), and N∈F⊆NN\in F\subseteq\mathbb{N}. Every k∈Fk\in F satisfies k≤Nk\le N and 1≤k1\le k, the latter by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (x); so k∈[N]k\in[N] by Intervals of Natural Numbers (i) and Intervals of Natural Numbers (ii).

(S3) Let DD and D′D' be sets, ρ:D→D′\rho:D\to D' an injective map, F⊆DF\subseteq D finite and f:D′→[0,∞]f:D'\to[0,\infty]. Then ρ(F)\rho(F) is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), and ρ∣F:F→ρ(F)\rho|_{F}:F\to\rho(F) is injective, as ρ\rho is, and surjective by The Image and the Preimage of a Class under a Class (i), hence a bijection. The map F→[0,∞]F\to[0,\infty], k↦f(ρ(k))k\mapsto f(\rho(k)), exists (maps u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) given by an expression, here and below, exist by Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i)). By Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (iii), ∑k∈Ff(ρ(k))=∑j∈ρ(F)f(j)\sum_{k\in F}f(\rho(k))=\sum_{j\in\rho(F)}f(j).

Proof of (iv). Let F⊆NF\subseteq\mathbb{N} be finite. By (S2), F⊆[N]F\subseteq[N] for some N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, so by Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (v) and (S1), ∑k∈Fak≤∑k∈[N]ak=sN≤Σa\sum_{k\in F}a_{k}\le\sum_{k\in[N]}a_{k}=s_{N}\le\Sigma a, the last as Σa\Sigma a is an upper bound of the partial sums (Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii)).

Proof of (v). Let t∈[0,∞]t\in[0,\infty] bound all sums over finite subsets of N\mathbb{N}. Each [n][n] is a finite subset of N\mathbb{N}, so sn=∑k∈[n]ak≤ts_{n}=\sum_{k\in[n]}a_{k}\le t for every nn by (S1); thus tt is an upper bound of the partial sums, and Σa≤t\Sigma a\le t, as Σa\Sigma a is their least upper bound (Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii)).

Proof of (i). By Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i), applied to the restriction of (ak)(a_{k}) to [n+1][n+1], sn+1=sn+an+1s_{n+1}=s_{n}+a_{n+1}, so sn≤sn+1s_{n}\le s_{n+1} by Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (v).

Proof of (ii). Σa\Sigma a is an upper bound of the partial sums by Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii), so sn≤Σas_{n}\le\Sigma a.

Proof of (iii). For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, {k}\{k\} is a finite subset of N\mathbb{N} (Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iii)) and ∑j∈{k}aj=ak\sum_{j\in\{k\}}a_{j}=a_{k} by Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (i); so ak≤Σaa_{k}\le\Sigma a by (iv).

Proof of (vi). Let ak∈Ra_{k}\in\mathbb{R} for every kk; then 0≤ak0\le a_{k} in R\mathbb{R}, as ak∈[0,∞]a_{k}\in[0,\infty], and (ak)(a_{k}) is also a sequence in R\mathbb{R}. Let rn=∑k=1nakr_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k} be the partial sums of the real series, which are iterated sums along [n][n] of the sum of R\mathbb{R} by Natural Numbers as Indices: ℕ ⊆ ℕ₀, 1 ∈ ℕ₀, and the Two Readings of an Operation from 1 to n (v), and real. We show by induction on nn that the partial sums sns_{n} in [0,∞][0,\infty] equal the real ones: let K={n∈N:sn=rn}K=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:s_{n}=r_{n}\}. By Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i), applied to the restriction of (ak)(a_{k}) to [1][1], once for the sum ++ on [0,∞][0,\infty] and once for the sum of R\mathbb{R}, s1=a1=r1s_{1}=a_{1}=r_{1}; so 1∈K1\in K. Let n∈Kn\in K. By Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i), applied to the restriction of (ak)(a_{k}) to [n+1][n+1] for both operations, sn+1=sn+an+1s_{n+1}=s_{n}+a_{n+1}, the sum taken in [0,∞][0,\infty], and rn+1=rn+an+1r_{n+1}=r_{n}+a_{n+1}, the sum taken in R\mathbb{R}. As sn=rns_{n}=r_{n} and an+1a_{n+1} are real elements of [0,∞][0,\infty], their sum in [0,∞][0,\infty] is their real sum, by Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (i); so sn+1=rn+an+1=rn+1s_{n+1}=r_{n}+a_{n+1}=r_{n+1}, and n+1∈Kn+1\in K. By Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (xiii), K=NK=\mathbb{N}. So P={sn:n∈N}P=\{s_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\} is a nonempty subset of R\mathbb{R}, it is the set of terms of (rn)(r_{n}), and Σa=sup⁡P\Sigma a=\sup P. If PP is bounded above in R\mathbb{R}, then the series ∑k=1∞ak\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k} converges with sum sup⁡RP\sup_{\mathbb{R}}P by Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (i) (with Bounded Sequences of Real Numbers (i)), and Σa=sup⁡RP\Sigma a=\sup_{\mathbb{R}}P by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (iv); so Σa∈R\Sigma a\in\mathbb{R} and the two sums agree. If PP is not bounded above in R\mathbb{R}, then the series does not converge, by Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (i), and Σa=∞∉R\Sigma a=\infty\notin\mathbb{R} by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (v). These two cases give the first assertion. If ak=∞a_{k}=\infty for some kk, then ∞≤Σa\infty\le\Sigma a by (iii), so Σa=∞\Sigma a=\infty by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (ii).

Proof of (vii). Let ak=0a_{k}=0 for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with n<kn<k, and let F⊆NF\subseteq\mathbb{N} be finite. If k∈F∖[n]k\in F\setminus[n], then 1≤k1\le k by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (x), so k≤nk\le n fails by Intervals of Natural Numbers (ii), and n<kn<k by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (vii) and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (vi); hence ak=0a_{k}=0. The sets F∩[n]F\cap[n] and F∖[n]F\setminus[n] are finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iv), disjoint, with union FF. By Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (ii), Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (vii) (the terms over F∖[n]F\setminus[n] being 00), Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (i), Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (v) and (S1),

∑k∈Fak=∑k∈F∩[n]ak+∑k∈F∖[n]0=∑k∈F∩[n]ak≤∑k∈[n]ak=sn.\sum_{k\in F}a_{k}=\sum_{k\in F\cap[n]}a_{k}+\sum_{k\in F\setminus[n]}0=\sum_{k\in F\cap[n]}a_{k}\le\sum_{k\in[n]}a_{k}=s_{n}.

So Σa≤sn\Sigma a\le s_{n} by (v), and sn≤Σas_{n}\le\Sigma a by (ii); hence Σa=sn\Sigma a=s_{n}.

Proof of (viii). Let sn′=∑k=1nbks'_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}b_{k} (maps n↦∑k=1nukn\mapsto\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k} of partial iterates, here and below, exist by Maps Given by Iterated Operations: Partial Iterates, Images of Natural Numbers, Powers and Operations over a Finite Set (i)). By Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (v), the nn-th partial sum of (ak+bk)(a_{k}+b_{k}) is sn+sn′s_{n}+s'_{n}. The sequences (sn)(s_{n}) and (sn′)(s'_{n}) satisfy sn≤sn+1s_{n}\le s_{n+1} by (i), and sn′≤sn+1′s'_{n}\le s'_{n+1} by (i) (applied to (bk)(b_{k})), so by Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (iii), ∑k∈N(ak+bk)=sup⁡n(sn+sn′)=sup⁡nsn+sup⁡nsn′=Σa+Σb\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}(a_{k}+b_{k})=\sup_{n}(s_{n}+s'_{n})=\sup_{n}s_{n}+\sup_{n}s'_{n}=\Sigma a+\Sigma b.

Proof of (ix). Let c∈[0,∞]c\in[0,\infty] and φ:[0,∞]→[0,∞]\varphi:[0,\infty]\to[0,\infty], x↦cxx\mapsto cx; then φ(x+y)=φ(x)+φ(y)\varphi(x+y)=\varphi(x)+\varphi(y) by Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (iii), so the nn-th partial sum of (cak)(ca_{k}) is csncs_{n} by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (ii). By Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (ii), applied to the nonempty set of partial sums, ∑k∈Ncak=sup⁡{csn:n∈N}=c Σa\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}ca_{k}=\sup\{cs_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}=c\,\Sigma a.

Proof of (x). Let ak≤bka_{k}\le b_{k} for every kk. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, by (S1), Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (iv) and (ii) (applied to (bk)(b_{k})), sn=∑k∈[n]ak≤∑k∈[n]bk≤Σbs_{n}=\sum_{k\in[n]}a_{k}\le\sum_{k\in[n]}b_{k}\le\Sigma b. So Σb\Sigma b is an upper bound of the partial sums of (ak)(a_{k}), and Σa≤Σb\Sigma a\le\Sigma b.

Proof of (xi). Let ck=aσ(k)c_{k}=a_{\sigma(k)}, so (ck)(c_{k}) is a sequence in [0,∞][0,\infty]. For a finite F⊆NF\subseteq\mathbb{N}, σ(F)\sigma(F) is a finite subset of N\mathbb{N}, and by (S3) and (iv), ∑k∈Fck=∑j∈σ(F)aj≤Σa\sum_{k\in F}c_{k}=\sum_{j\in\sigma(F)}a_{j}\le\Sigma a. By (v), applied to (ck)(c_{k}), ∑k∈Nck≤Σa\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}c_{k}\le\Sigma a. By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction (vi), σ−1:N→N\sigma^{-1}:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} is a bijection with σ(σ−1(j))=j\sigma(\sigma^{-1}(j))=j, so aj=cσ−1(j)a_{j}=c_{\sigma^{-1}(j)} for every j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}; the same argument with (ck)(c_{k}) and σ−1\sigma^{-1} in place of (ak)(a_{k}) and σ\sigma gives Σa≤∑k∈Nck\Sigma a\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}c_{k}. By antisymmetry the two sums are equal.

Proof of (xii). For m,N∈Nm,N\in\mathbb{N} let Rm=∑n∈Nw(m,n)R_{m}=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}w(m,n) and let Rm(N)=∑n=1Nw(m,n)=∑n∈[N]w(m,n)R_{m}(N)=\sum_{n=1}^{N}w(m,n)=\sum_{n\in[N]}w(m,n) (by (S1)) be the NN-th partial sum of n↦w(m,n)n\mapsto w(m,n); so Rm=sup⁡NRm(N)R_{m}=\sup_{N}R_{m}(N) by Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii), and Rm(N)≤Rm(N+1)R_{m}(N)\le R_{m}(N+1) and Rm(N)≤RmR_{m}(N)\le R_{m} by (i) and (ii) (applied to n↦w(m,n)n\mapsto w(m,n)). The map m↦Rmm\mapsto R_{m} is a sequence in [0,∞][0,\infty] (maps u↦sup⁡t(u)u\mapsto\sup t(u), here and below, exist by Predicative Formulas for Suprema and Infima, and Maps Defined by Suprema and Infima (iii), ≤\le being a partial order on [−∞,∞][-\infty,\infty]).

(i) We show ∑m∈NRm=sup⁡Msup⁡N∑m∈[M]∑n∈[N]w(m,n)\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}R_{m}=\sup_{M}\sup_{N}\sum_{m\in[M]}\sum_{n\in[N]}w(m,n), the maps N↦∑m∈[M]Rm(N)N\mapsto\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}(N) and m↦∑n∈[N]w(m,n)m\mapsto\sum_{n\in[N]}w(m,n) existing by Maps Given by Iterated Operations: Partial Iterates, Images of Natural Numbers, Powers and Operations over a Finite Set (v) (as do the maps x↦∑y∈Bf(x,y)x\mapsto\sum_{y\in B}f(x,y) over a fixed finite set BB below). Let M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}. The map N×[M]→[0,∞]\mathbb{N}\times[M]\to[0,\infty], (N,m)↦Rm(N)(N,m)\mapsto R_{m}(N), is the restriction to N×[M]\mathbb{N}\times[M] of the map g:N×N→[0,∞]g:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to[0,\infty] with g(N,m)=∑n=1Nw(m,n)=Rm(N)g(N,m)=\sum_{n=1}^{N}w(m,n)=R_{m}(N) given by Partial Iterates of a Two-Variable Map, Row by Row and Column by Column (i), applied with A=NA=\mathbb{N}, X=[0,∞]X=[0,\infty], ∗\ast the sum ++ of Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (i), and f=wf=w. It is nondecreasing in NN, so by Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (viii),

∑m∈[M]Rm=∑m∈[M]sup⁡NRm(N)=sup⁡N∑m∈[M]Rm(N)=sup⁡N∑m∈[M]∑n∈[N]w(m,n).\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}=\sum_{m\in[M]}\sup_{N}R_{m}(N)=\sup_{N}\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}(N)=\sup_{N}\sum_{m\in[M]}\sum_{n\in[N]}w(m,n).

By (S1), ∑m∈[M]Rm\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m} is the MM-th partial sum of (Rm)(R_{m}), so the claim follows from Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii).

(ii) Let w′:N×N→[0,∞]w':\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to[0,\infty] be the map with w′(n,m)=w(m,n)w'(n,m)=w(m,n) for all m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N}, given by Partial Iterates of a Two-Variable Map, Row by Row and Column by Column (iii) with A=B=NA=B=\mathbb{N}, X=[0,∞]X=[0,\infty] and f=wf=w. Then (i), applied to w′w' with the names of the two variables exchanged, gives

∑n∈N∑m∈Nw(m,n)=sup⁡Nsup⁡M∑n∈[N]∑m∈[M]w(m,n).\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}w(m,n)=\sup_{N}\sup_{M}\sum_{n\in[N]}\sum_{m\in[M]}w(m,n).

(iii) For M,N∈NM,N\in\mathbb{N} let T(M,N)=∑(m,n)∈[M]×[N]w(m,n)T(M,N)=\sum_{(m,n)\in[M]\times[N]}w(m,n), the set [M]×[N][M]\times[N] being finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v). By Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (iv),

T(M,N)=∑m∈[M]∑n∈[N]w(m,n)=∑n∈[N]∑m∈[M]w(m,n).T(M,N)=\sum_{m\in[M]}\sum_{n\in[N]}w(m,n)=\sum_{n\in[N]}\sum_{m\in[M]}w(m,n).

So by (i) and (ii) it remains to show that J1=sup⁡Msup⁡NT(M,N)J_{1}=\sup_{M}\sup_{N}T(M,N) equals J2=sup⁡Nsup⁡MT(M,N)J_{2}=\sup_{N}\sup_{M}T(M,N). For all M,N∈NM,N\in\mathbb{N}, T(M,N)≤sup⁡M′T(M′,N)≤J2T(M,N)\le\sup_{M'}T(M',N)\le J_{2}. Hence, for each MM, J2J_{2} is an upper bound of {T(M,N):N∈N}\{T(M,N):N\in\mathbb{N}\}, so sup⁡NT(M,N)≤J2\sup_{N}T(M,N)\le J_{2} by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iv); so J2J_{2} is an upper bound of {sup⁡NT(M,N):M∈N}\{\sup_{N}T(M,N):M\in\mathbb{N}\}, and J1≤J2J_{1}\le J_{2}. Exchanging the roles of MM and NN gives J2≤J1J_{2}\le J_{1}, and J1=J2J_{1}=J_{2} by antisymmetry (Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (i)).

Proof of (xiii). The first equality is (xii). Let RmR_{m} and Rm(N)R_{m}(N) be as in the proof of (xii), and tk=w(τ(k))t_{k}=w(\tau(k)) for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. It remains to show ∑m∈NRm=∑k∈Ntk\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}R_{m}=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}t_{k}.

(a) Let F⊆NF\subseteq\mathbb{N} be finite. Then τ(F)\tau(F) is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), and so is the set GG of the components p1p_{1} and p2p_{2} of the elements p∈τ(F)p\in\tau(F), a subset of N\mathbb{N} that is the union of the images of τ(F)\tau(F) under the two component maps N×N→N\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} (Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi) and Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v)). By (S2), G⊆[N]G\subseteq[N] for some N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, so τ(F)⊆Q=[N]×[N]\tau(F)\subseteq Q=[N]\times[N], a finite set by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v). By (S3), Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (v), Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (iv), Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (iv) (with Rm(N)≤RmR_{m}(N)\le R_{m}), and (iv),

∑k∈Ftk=∑p∈τ(F)w(p)≤∑p∈Qw(p)=∑m∈[N]Rm(N)≤∑m∈[N]Rm≤∑m∈NRm.\sum_{k\in F}t_{k}=\sum_{p\in\tau(F)}w(p)\le\sum_{p\in Q}w(p)=\sum_{m\in[N]}R_{m}(N)\le\sum_{m\in[N]}R_{m}\le\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}R_{m}.

By (v), ∑k∈Ntk≤∑m∈NRm\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}t_{k}\le\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}R_{m}.

(b) Let M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}. The map N×[M]→[0,∞]\mathbb{N}\times[M]\to[0,\infty], (N,m)↦Rm(N)(N,m)\mapsto R_{m}(N), the restriction to N×[M]\mathbb{N}\times[M] of the map given by Partial Iterates of a Two-Variable Map, Row by Row and Column by Column (i) as in (i) of the proof of (xii), is nondecreasing in NN, so by Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (viii), ∑m∈[M]Rm=sup⁡N∑m∈[M]Rm(N)\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}=\sup_{N}\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}(N). Let N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, Q=[M]×[N]Q=[M]\times[N], finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v), and H={k∈N:τ(k)∈Q}H=\{k\in\mathbb{N}:\tau(k)\in Q\}. By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction (vi), τ−1:N×N→N\tau^{-1}:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} is a bijection with τ(τ−1(q))=q\tau(\tau^{-1}(q))=q and τ−1(τ(k))=k\tau^{-1}(\tau(k))=k; hence H=τ−1(Q)H=\tau^{-1}(Q) is the image of QQ under τ−1\tau^{-1}, finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), and τ(H)=Q\tau(H)=Q. By Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (iv), (S3) and (iv),

∑m∈[M]Rm(N)=∑p∈Qw(p)=∑k∈Htk≤∑k∈Ntk.\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}(N)=\sum_{p\in Q}w(p)=\sum_{k\in H}t_{k}\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}t_{k}.

Hence ∑m∈[M]Rm≤∑k∈Ntk\sum_{m\in[M]}R_{m}\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}t_{k}, which by (S1) bounds the MM-th partial sum of (Rm)(R_{m}); as MM is arbitrary, ∑m∈NRm≤∑k∈Ntk\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}R_{m}\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}t_{k}. With (a), ∑m∈NRm=∑k∈Ntk\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}R_{m}=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}t_{k}.

Proof of (xiv). Let gk=sup⁡nw(n,k)g_{k}=\sup_{n}w(n,k) for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, Sn=∑k∈Nw(n,k)S_{n}=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}w(n,k) for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, and L=sup⁡nSnL=\sup_{n}S_{n}, all in [0,∞][0,\infty] by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (ix). As w(n,k)≤gkw(n,k)\le g_{k} for all n,kn,k, (x) gives Sn≤∑k∈NgkS_{n}\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}g_{k} for every nn, so L≤∑k∈NgkL\le\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}g_{k}. Conversely let N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}. By (S1) and Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (viii), applied to the restriction of ww to N×[N]\mathbb{N}\times[N],

∑k=1Ngk=∑k∈[N]sup⁡nw(n,k)=sup⁡n∑k∈[N]w(n,k),\sum_{k=1}^{N}g_{k}=\sum_{k\in[N]}\sup_{n}w(n,k)=\sup_{n}\sum_{k\in[N]}w(n,k),

and ∑k∈[N]w(n,k)≤Sn≤L\sum_{k\in[N]}w(n,k)\le S_{n}\le L for every nn, by (S1) and (ii) (applied to k↦w(n,k)k\mapsto w(n,k)). So ∑k=1Ngk≤L\sum_{k=1}^{N}g_{k}\le L for every NN, and ∑k∈Ngk≤L\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}g_{k}\le L. By antisymmetry, ∑k∈Ngk=L\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}g_{k}=L.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…