Step 0 (auxiliary facts). (a) Sums and scalar multiples of measurable functions are measurable. For real-valued measurablef,g and a∈R: {f+g>a}=⋃q({f>q}∩{g>a−q}), the union over the countably many rational q (if f(x)+g(x)>a, choose rational q with f(x)>q>a−g(x) by Density of the rational numbers in the real numbers); each member is in F, so the union is. For c>0, {cf>a}={f>a/c}; for c<0, {cf>a}={f<a/c}, where {f<b}=X∖{f≥b} and {f≥b}=⋂j∈N{f>b−1/j}∈F; and for c=0 the function cf is constant, hence measurable. The same identities give these facts for [0,∞]-valued measurable functions in the sense of Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function, with the conventions of Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure.
(b) Simple approximation. Every measurable f:X→[0,∞] is the pointwise supremum of a nondecreasing sequence of nonnegative simple functions: put
sm(x)=min{m,2−m⌊2mf(x)⌋}
where ⌊t⌋ denotes the greatest integer ≤t and sm(x)=m when f(x)=∞. Each sm takes finitely many values and is measurable (its level sets are finite unions of sets of the form {a<f≤b} or {f>m}, all in F by the identities above), sm≤sm+1, and supmsm=f pointwise.
(c) Additivity for simple functions. If s,t are nonnegative simple with standard representations on partitions (Ai), (Bj), then on the common refinement (Ai∩Bj) both are constant, and computing the integral of s+t over the refinement gives, by finite additivity of μ (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure) and rearrangement of finite sums,
∫X(s+t)dμ=∫Xsdμ+∫Xtdμ,∫Xcsdμ=c∫Xsdμ(c≥0),
using that the integral of a nonnegative simple function may be computed from any representation over a finite measurable partition on which it is constant (grouping equal values and adding measures).
Claim 1. Measurability of f+g and cf is Step 0(a). Monotonicity was shown in Step 1 of the proof of Monotone Convergence Theorem. For additivity: take simple approximations sm↑f, tm↑g from Step 0(b); then sm+tm↑f+g, and by Monotone Convergence Theorem and Step 0(c),
the last step because both inner sequences are nondecreasing, so the supremum of the sum is the sum of the suprema in [0,∞]. The scalar case is analogous via csm↑cf (for c>0; c=0 is trivial by the convention 0⋅∞=0).
Claim 2. Let f,g be integrable and a,b∈R. af+bg is measurable by Step 0(a), and ∣af+bg∣≤∣a∣∣f∣+∣b∣∣g∣ pointwise, so by claim 1 and monotonicity ∫∣af+bg∣dμ<∞; hence af+bg is integrable by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. For additivity with a=b=1: write h=f+g; from h+−h−=f+−f−+g+−g− (pointwise identity of real numbers) we get
h++f−+g−=h−+f++g+
pointwise, with all six functions nonnegative measurable; claim 1 gives equality of the integrals of the two sides, all terms finite, and rearranging real numbers yields ∫hdμ=∫fdμ+∫gdμ. For scalars: if a≥0 then (af)±=af± and claim 1 applies; if a<0 then (af)+=(−a)f− and (af)−=(−a)f+, and the definition gives ∫afdμ=a∫fdμ. Combining, ∫(af+bg)dμ=a∫fdμ+b∫gdμ.
Finally, ±f≤∣f∣ pointwise, so by the integrable-case monotonicity — which follows since g−f≥0 implies ∫gdμ−∫fdμ=∫(g−f)dμ≥0 by additivity and nonnegativity of the integral of a nonnegative function — we get ±∫Xfdμ≤∫X∣f∣dμ, i.e. ∫Xfdμ≤∫X∣f∣dμ. ■