TheoremBase

Proof

Write λ=λ[0,T]\lambda=\lambda_{[0,T]}, B=B[0,T]\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}, PT=T−1λP_{T}=T^{-1}\lambda, and let Gm\mathcal{G}_{m}, Im,pI_{m,p}, AmA_{m} be as in the dyadic averaging lemma.

Claim 1. Square-integrability. Let w=∑p=12mcp1Im,p∈Dmw=\sum_{p=1}^{2^{m}}c_{p}\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}}\in D_{m}. Its ii-th component is wi=∑pcpi1Im,pw^{i}=\sum_{p}c_{p}^{i}\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}}, a simple function built from the sets Im,p∈BI_{m,p}\in\mathcal{B}, hence B\mathcal{B}-measurable. Since the atoms are pairwise disjoint with union [0,T][0,T], ww takes only the values c1,…,c2mc_{1},\dots,c_{2^{m}}, so with CC the greatest element of the finite family (∣cp∣)p∈{1,…,2m}\bigl(|c_{p}|\bigr)_{p\in\{1,\dots,2^{m}\}}, which exists by Greatest Element of a Finite Family in a Totally Ordered Set, we get ∣w∣2≤C2|w|^{2}\le C^{2} pointwise and, by monotonicity, ∫[0,T]∣w∣2 dλ≤C2λ([0,T])=C2T<∞\int_{[0,T]}|w|^{2}\,d\lambda\le C^{2}\lambda([0,T])=C^{2}T<\infty. So w∈L2([0,T];Rd)w\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Countability. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. The set Qd\mathbb{Q}^{d} is countable by claim 3 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable, hence so is the set (Qd)2m(\mathbb{Q}^{d})^{2^{m}} of 2m2^{m}-tuples in Qd\mathbb{Q}^{d}, by claim 2 of Products and Powers of Countable Sets. The map sending a tuple (c1,…,c2m)(c_{1},\dots,c_{2^{m}}) to ∑p=12mcp1Im,p\sum_{p=1}^{2^{m}}c_{p}\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}} has image exactly DmD_{m}, so DmD_{m} is countable by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets. The sets DmD_{m} form a family of subsets of the set of all maps [0,T]→Rd[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{d}, indexed by N\mathbb{N}, so their union DD is countable by A Countable Union of Countable Sets is Countable.

Claim 2. Let u∈L2([0,T];Rd)u\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be real.

Step A: dyadic averages approximate uu. By claim 7 of the inner-product lemma, each component uiu^{i} is a square-integrable random variable on ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}). By claim 3 of the dyadic averaging lemma, AmuiA_{m}u^{i} is a conditional expectation of uiu^{i} given Gm\mathcal{G}_{m}; by claim 1 of that lemma the Gm\mathcal{G}_{m} (m≥1m\ge1) form a nondecreasing sequence of sub-σ\sigma-algebras of B\mathcal{B}; and by claim 2 of that lemma their generated σ\sigma-algebra is B\mathcal{B} itself. Since uiu^{i} is B\mathcal{B}-measurable and square-integrable, the choice Y=uiY=u^{i} satisfies conditions (i), (ii), (iii) of the definition of conditional expectation with G=B\mathcal{G}=\mathcal{B}, so uiu^{i} is a conditional expectation of uiu^{i} given B\mathcal{B}. Levy's upward theorem in mean square, applied to uiu^{i} and this filtration, therefore gives ∥Amui−ui∥2→0\lVert A_{m}u^{i}-u^{i}\rVert_{2}\to0 as m→∞m\to\infty.

Let Amu:[0,T]→RdA_{m}u:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{d} be the map with components (Amu)i=Amui(A_{m}u)^{i}=A_{m}u^{i}, that is

Amu=∑p=12mbm,p 1Im,p,bm,p=2m(E[u11Im,p],…,E[ud1Im,p])∈Rd.A_{m}u=\sum_{p=1}^{2^{m}}b_{m,p}\,\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}},\qquad b_{m,p}=2^{m}\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[u^{1}\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}}\bigr],\dots,\mathbb{E}\bigl[u^{d}\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}}\bigr]\Bigr)\in\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Each AmuiA_{m}u^{i} is bounded and B\mathcal{B}-measurable by claim 3 of the dyadic averaging lemma, so Amu∈L2([0,T];Rd)A_{m}u\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by the argument already given in claim 1. By claim 7 of the inner-product lemma,

∥[Amu]−[u]∥L22=T∑i=1d∥Amui−ui∥22,\lVert[A_{m}u]-[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert A_{m}u^{i}-u^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2},

a finite sum of real sequences each with limit 00, hence with limit 00. Fix m≥1m\ge1 with ∥[Amu]−[u]∥L2<ε/2\lVert[A_{m}u]-[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon/2 and abbreviate bp=bm,pb_{p}=b_{m,p}.

Step B: rounding the values to rational vectors. Put η=ε(2Td)−1\eta=\varepsilon\bigl(2\sqrt{Td}\bigr)^{-1}, a positive real number. By claim 2 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers there is, for each p∈{1,…,2m}p\in\{1,\dots,2^{m}\} and each i∈{1,…,d}i\in\{1,\dots,d\}, a rational number cpic_{p}^{i} with ∣bpi−cpi∣<η\bigl|b_{p}^{i}-c_{p}^{i}\bigr|<\eta. The vector cp=(cp1,…,cpd)c_{p}=(c_{p}^{1},\dots,c_{p}^{d}) then lies in Qd\mathbb{Q}^{d}, and by claim 1 of the elementary properties of the Euclidean norm,

∣bp−cp∣2=∑i=1d(bpi−cpi)2<d η2=ε24T.|b_{p}-c_{p}|^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\bigl(b_{p}^{i}-c_{p}^{i}\bigr)^{2}<d\,\eta^{2}=\frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4T}.

Define

w=∑p=12mcp 1Im,p,w=\sum_{p=1}^{2^{m}}c_{p}\,\mathbf{1}_{I_{m,p}},

which lies in DmD_{m} and hence in DD. Let κ\kappa be the greatest element of the finite family (∣bp−cp∣2)p∈{1,…,2m}\bigl(|b_{p}-c_{p}|^{2}\bigr)_{p\in\{1,\dots,2^{m}\}}, which exists by Greatest Element of a Finite Family in a Totally Ordered Set; then κ<ε2(4T)−1\kappa<\varepsilon^{2}(4T)^{-1}. By claim 1 of the dyadic averaging lemma the level-mm atoms are pairwise disjoint with union [0,T][0,T], so each t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] lies in exactly one atom Im,pI_{m,p}, and there AmuA_{m}u takes the value bpb_{p} and ww the value cpc_{p}, whence ∣w(t)−Amu(t)∣2=∣cp−bp∣2≤κ|w(t)-A_{m}u(t)|^{2}=|c_{p}-b_{p}|^{2}\le\kappa. Therefore, by monotonicity,

∥[w]−[Amu]∥L22=∫[0,T]∣w−Amu∣2 dλ≤κ T<ε24,\lVert[w]-[A_{m}u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\int_{[0,T]}|w-A_{m}u|^{2}\,d\lambda\le\kappa\,T<\frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4},

and since both sides are nonnegative, ∥[w]−[Amu]∥L2<ε/2\lVert[w]-[A_{m}u]\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon/2.

Conclusion. Note first that ∥v−v′∥L2=∥v′−v∥L2\lVert v-v'\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert v'-v\rVert_{L^{2}} for all v,v′v,v', by the absolute homogeneity in claim 5 of the inner-product lemma applied to the scalar −1-1. By the triangle inequality of that same claim,

∥[u]−[w]∥L2≤∥[u]−[Amu]∥L2+∥[Amu]−[w]∥L2<ε.\lVert[u]-[w]\rVert_{L^{2}}\le\lVert[u]-[A_{m}u]\rVert_{L^{2}}+\lVert[A_{m}u]-[w]\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon .

Density. Let UU be a nonempty open subset of L2([0,T];Rd)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let ξ∈U\xi\in U. There is a real ε>0\varepsilon>0 with {ζ:dL2(ζ,ξ)<ε}⊆U\{\zeta:d_{L^{2}}(\zeta,\xi)<\varepsilon\}\subseteq U. Choosing a representative u∈L2([0,T];Rd)u\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) of ξ\xi and applying claim 2 produces w∈Dw\in D with dL2([w],ξ)=∥[w]−[u]∥L2=∥[u]−[w]∥L2<εd_{L^{2}}([w],\xi)=\lVert[w]-[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert[u]-[w]\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon, so [w]∈U[w]\in U. Thus {[w]:w∈D}\{[w]:w\in D\} meets every nonempty open subset, so its closure is the whole space and it is dense. Finally, {[w]:w∈D}\{[w]:w\in D\} is the set of values of the map w↦[w]w\mapsto[w] on DD, so it is countable by claim 1 above and claim 4 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…