TheoremBase

Monotonicity of the partial sums reduces convergence to boundedness and identifies the sum with the supremum; the geometric series is computed from a closed form for its partial sums, and the tail bound follows by applying the domination claim to the complementary series.

Proof

Throughout, (sn)(s_{n}) and (tn)(t_{n}) denote the partial sums of (ak)(a_{k}) and (bk)(b_{k}). We write SS for the successor map on N\mathbb{N} and n+1n+1 for S(n)S(n), and use the recursion of claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums: s1=a1s_{1}=a_{1} and sn+1=sn+an+1s_{n+1}=s_{n}+a_{n+1}.

Claim 1. Assume 0≤ak0\le a_{k} for every kk. From sn+1=sn+an+1s_{n+1}=s_{n}+a_{n+1} and claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we get sn≤sn+1s_{n}\le s_{n+1} for every nn. By induction on nn it follows that sm≤sns_{m}\le s_{n} whenever m≤nm\le n: the case n=mn=m is claim 1 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers together with reflexivity of ≤\le on R\mathbb{R}, and the inductive step is sm≤sn≤sn+1s_{m}\le s_{n}\le s_{n+1}. Also 0≤s1=a10\le s_{1}=a_{1}, so 0≤sn0\le s_{n} for every nn.

Let P={sn:n∈N}P=\{s_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}, a nonempty subset of R\mathbb{R}. If ∑k=1∞ak\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k} converges, then (sn)(s_{n}) converges and is therefore bounded by claim 2 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences; in particular PP is bounded above.

Conversely, suppose PP is bounded above and let L=sup⁡PL=\sup P, which exists and is unique by the least upper bound property. Let ε\varepsilon be positive. By claim 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} there is sN∈Ps_{N}\in P with L−ε<sNL-\varepsilon<s_{N}. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with N≤nN\le n we have sN≤sn≤Ls_{N}\le s_{n}\le L, the last because LL is an upper bound for PP; hence −ε<sn−L≤0<ε-\varepsilon<s_{n}-L\le0<\varepsilon and so ∣sn−L∣<ε|s_{n}-L|<\varepsilon by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Thus (sn)(s_{n}) converges to LL, so the series converges with sum L=sup⁡PL=\sup P.

Claim 2. Under the hypotheses, claim 1 gives ∑k=1∞ak=sup⁡P\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}=\sup P, which is an upper bound for PP, so sn≤∑k=1∞aks_{n}\le\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k} for every nn; and 0≤sn0\le s_{n} was shown in claim 1.

Claim 3. By claims 2, 3 and 5 of Properties of Finite Sums, the nn-th partial sum of the sequence with terms bk+(−1)akb_{k}+(-1)a_{k}, which are nonnegative, equals tn−snt_{n}-s_{n} and is nonnegative; hence sn≤tns_{n}\le t_{n} for every nn. Writing T=∑k=1∞bkT=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}b_{k}, claim 2 applied to (bk)(b_{k}) gives tn≤Tt_{n}\le T, so sn≤Ts_{n}\le T for every nn and the set {sn:n∈N}\{s_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\} is bounded above. By claim 1 the series ∑k=1∞ak\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k} converges, with sum sup⁡{sn:n∈N}\sup\{s_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}; since TT is an upper bound for that set, ∑k=1∞ak≤T\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}\le T.

Claim 4. Since r<1r<1, claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<1−r0<1-r, so 1−r1-r is nonzero and has a positive multiplicative inverse by claim 7 of that lemma.

The sequence (rk)(r^{k}) converges to 00. By claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, rk+1=rkrr^{k+1}=r^{k}r, and by claim 5 of that lemma 0≤rk0\le r^{k}. Hence rk+1=rkr≤rk⋅1=rkr^{k+1}=r^{k}r\le r^{k}\cdot1=r^{k} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and by induction rn≤rmr^{n}\le r^{m} whenever m≤nm\le n. The set {rk:k∈N}\{r^{k}:k\in\mathbb{N}\} is nonempty and bounded below by 00, so L=inf⁡{rk:k∈N}L=\inf\{r^{k}:k\in\mathbb{N}\} exists by the greatest lower bound property. Given a positive ε\varepsilon, claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} provides NN with rN<L+εr^{N}<L+\varepsilon, and then L≤rk≤rN<L+εL\le r^{k}\le r^{N}<L+\varepsilon for N≤kN\le k, so ∣rk−L∣<ε|r^{k}-L|<\varepsilon by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Hence (rk)(r^{k}) converges to LL. The sequence (rk+1)k∈N(r^{k+1})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to LL as well, since N≤kN\le k implies N≤k+1N\le k+1 by claims 1 and 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers; on the other hand (rk+1)=(rkr)(r^{k+1})=(r^{k}r) converges to LrLr by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences. By uniqueness of limits, L=LrL=Lr, hence L(1−r)=0L(1-r)=0, and multiplying by (1−r)−1(1-r)^{-1} gives L=0L=0.

The partial sums. We prove ∑k=1nrk=r−rn+11−r\sum_{k=1}^{n}r^{k}=\frac{r-r^{n+1}}{1-r} by induction on nn. For n=1n=1: (1−r)r=r−r2(1-r)r=r-r^{2}, so r=r−r21−rr=\frac{r-r^{2}}{1-r}. Assuming the identity for nn,

∑k=1n+1rk=r−rn+11−r+rn+1=r−rn+1+rn+1(1−r)1−r=r−rn+1r1−r=r−rn+21−r,\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}r^{k}=\frac{r-r^{n+1}}{1-r}+r^{n+1}=\frac{r-r^{n+1}+r^{n+1}(1-r)}{1-r}=\frac{r-r^{n+1}r}{1-r}=\frac{r-r^{n+2}}{1-r},

using rn+1r=rn+2r^{n+1}r=r^{n+2} from claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field.

The sum and the tails. The sequence (rn+1)n∈N(r^{n+1})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00, as shown above, so by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences the sequence of partial sums converges to r−01−r=r1−r\frac{r-0}{1-r}=\frac{r}{1-r}. Hence ∑k=1∞rk=r1−r\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}r^{k}=\frac{r}{1-r}, and subtracting the closed form of the nn-th partial sum gives

∑k=1∞rk−∑k=1nrk=r1−r−r−rn+11−r=rn+11−r.\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}r^{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{n}r^{k}=\frac{r}{1-r}-\frac{r-r^{n+1}}{1-r}=\frac{r^{n+1}}{1-r}.

For r=12r=\tfrac{1}{2} we have 1−r=121-r=\tfrac{1}{2}, so r1−r=1\frac{r}{1-r}=1 and rn+11−r=2 rn+1=2 rnr=rn\frac{r^{n+1}}{1-r}=2\,r^{n+1}=2\,r^{n}r=r^{n}, since 2r=12r=1.

Claim 5. From 0≤μk0\le\mu_{k} and 0≤wk≤M0\le w_{k}\le M, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0≤μkwk0\le\mu_{k}w_{k} and μkwk≤μkM\mu_{k}w_{k}\le\mu_{k}M. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers the series with terms μkM\mu_{k}M converges, with sum M∑k=1∞μkM\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\mu_{k}, so ∑k=1∞μkwk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\mu_{k}w_{k} converges by claim 3 above. The left-hand inequality is claim 2 above applied to the sequence with terms μkwk\mu_{k}w_{k}.

For the right-hand inequality, put vk=μk(M−wk)v_{k}=\mu_{k}(M-w_{k}). Then 0≤M−wk0\le M-w_{k} and hence 0≤vk0\le v_{k} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and vk=μkM−μkwkv_{k}=\mu_{k}M-\mu_{k}w_{k}. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers the series ∑k=1∞vk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}v_{k} converges with sum M∑k=1∞μk−∑k=1∞μkwkM\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\mu_{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\mu_{k}w_{k}, and by claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums its nn-th partial sum equals M∑k=1nμk−∑k=1nμkwkM\sum_{k=1}^{n}\mu_{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{n}\mu_{k}w_{k}. Claim 2 above, applied to (vk)(v_{k}), gives

M∑k=1nμk−∑k=1nμkwk≤M∑k=1∞μk−∑k=1∞μkwk,M\sum_{k=1}^{n}\mu_{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{n}\mu_{k}w_{k}\le M\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\mu_{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\mu_{k}w_{k},

and rearranging, by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, yields the asserted bound.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…