TheoremBase

The relation and an order relation on pairs are given by formulas in the pair components, so membership reduces to a+d=b+c (resp. a+d<=b+c); reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity follow by natural-number arithmetic, and the quotient lemmas describe the quotient. Sum, product and negation maps are defined on pairs, shown compatible with the relation, and passed to the quotient by the compatibility lemma, which also gives uniqueness.

Proof

Membership. N\mathbb{N} is a set by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §sets, so PP is a set by Membership in a Cartesian Product, and the Cartesian Product of Two Sets Is a Set §set. By The Cartesian Product of Two Classes §product and Membership in a Cartesian Product, and the Cartesian Product of Two Sets Is a Set §membership, the elements of PP are exactly the ordered pairs (a,b)(a,b) with a,b∈Na,b\in\mathbb{N}. By The Components of an Ordered Pair §components, the components of such a pair p=(a,b)p=(a,b) are p1=ap_1=a and p2=bp_2=b; in particular p1,p2∈Np_1,p_2\in\mathbb{N} for every p∈Pp\in P. Sums and products of natural numbers are natural numbers by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §operations. Hence the formulas and expressions below, built from components of elements of PP by sums, products and the order of natural numbers, quantify over sets only and use every defined set symbol properly for arguments in PP, and every pair of such sums and products lies in PP.

The relations ∼\sim and ⪯\preceq. Write p∼qp\sim q for (p,q)∈∼(p,q)\in{\sim}, as in Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §relation. By Maps and Relations Given by Formulas §relation, applied to the set PP and the formula p1+q2=p2+q1p_1+q_2=p_2+q_1, there is exactly one relation on PP with p∼qp\sim q if and only if p1+q2=p2+q1p_1+q_2=p_2+q_1, for all p,q∈Pp,q\in P; as every element of PP is a pair (a,b)(a,b) with components aa and bb, this is the relation ∼\sim of the statement, and for a,b,c,d∈Na,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N},

(a,b)∼(c,d)if and only ifa+d=b+c.(∗)(a,b)\sim(c,d)\quad\text{if and only if}\quad a+d=b+c.\qquad(\ast)

In the same way, Maps and Relations Given by Formulas §relation, applied to PP and the formula p1+q2≤p2+q1p_1+q_2\le p_2+q_1, gives a relation ⪯\preceq on PP such that, for a,b,c,d∈Na,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N},

(a,b)⪯(c,d)if and only ifa+d≤b+c.(∗∗)(a,b)\preceq(c,d)\quad\text{if and only if}\quad a+d\le b+c.\qquad(\ast\ast)

The clause equivalence above. Let (a,b),(c,d),(e,f)∈P(a,b),(c,d),(e,f)\in P.

Reflexive: a+b=b+aa+b=b+a by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative, so (a,b)∼(a,b)(a,b)\sim(a,b) by (∗)(\ast). Thus ∼\sim is reflexive.

Symmetric: if (a,b)∼(c,d)(a,b)\sim(c,d), then a+d=b+ca+d=b+c by (∗)(\ast), so c+b=d+ac+b=d+a by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative, that is, (c,d)∼(a,b)(c,d)\sim(a,b). Thus ∼\sim is symmetric.

Transitive: if (a,b)∼(c,d)(a,b)\sim(c,d) and (c,d)∼(e,f)(c,d)\sim(e,f), then a+d=b+ca+d=b+c and c+f=d+ec+f=d+e by (∗)(\ast). Adding, (a+d)+(c+f)=(b+c)+(d+e)(a+d)+(c+f)=(b+c)+(d+e); rearranging by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §associative,

(a+f)+(c+d)=(b+e)+(c+d),(a+f)+(c+d)=(b+e)+(c+d),

so a+f=b+ea+f=b+e by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §cancellation, that is, (a,b)∼(e,f)(a,b)\sim(e,f). Thus ∼\sim is transitive.

Hence ∼\sim is an equivalence relation on the set PP by Equivalence Relations on a Set §equivalence.

The clause equal above. As ∼\sim is an equivalence relation on the set PP, the quotient P/∼P/{\sim} is a set by Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §quotient-set. By The Quotient of a Set by an Equivalence Relation and the Canonical Projection §quotient, the elements of P/∼P/{\sim} are exactly the classes [p][p] with p∈Pp\in P; as the elements of PP are exactly the pairs (a,b)(a,b) with a,b∈Na,b\in\mathbb{N}, these are exactly the classes [a,b][a,b] with a,b∈Na,b\in\mathbb{N}. For a,b,c,d∈Na,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}, [a,b]=[c,d][a,b]=[c,d] if and only if (a,b)∼(c,d)(a,b)\sim(c,d), by Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §equal, that is, by (∗)(\ast), if and only if a+d=b+ca+d=b+c.

The clause operations above. Operations on PP. The expressions (p1+q1, p2+q2)(p_1+q_1,\,p_2+q_2) and (p1q1+p2q2, p1q2+p2q1)(p_1q_1+p_2q_2,\,p_1q_2+p_2q_1) lie in PP for all p,q∈Pp,q\in P, so Maps and Relations Given by Formulas §binary, with domain P×PP\times P and values in PP, gives maps ⊕,⊗:P×P→P\oplus,\otimes:P\times P\to P, that is, binary operations on PP, with, in the notation of Binary Operations on a Set §notation,

(a,b)⊕(c,d)=(a+c, b+d),(a,b)⊗(c,d)=(ac+bd, ad+bc)(a,b,c,d∈N).(a,b)\oplus(c,d)=(a+c,\,b+d),\qquad(a,b)\otimes(c,d)=(ac+bd,\,ad+bc)\qquad(a,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}).

Likewise Maps and Relations Given by Formulas §map, applied to (p2,p1)(p_2,p_1), gives a map ⊖:P→P\ominus:P\to P with ⊖((a,b))=(b,a)\ominus((a,b))=(b,a).

Compatibility. Let p=(a,b)p=(a,b), p′=(a′,b′)p'=(a',b'), q=(c,d)q=(c,d) and q′=(c′,d′)q'=(c',d') be elements of PP with p∼p′p\sim p' and q∼q′q\sim q', that is, by (∗)(\ast),

a+b′=b+a′andc+d′=d+c′.(†)a+b'=b+a'\qquad\text{and}\qquad c+d'=d+c'.\qquad(\dagger)

Sum: p⊕q=(a+c,b+d)p\oplus q=(a+c,b+d) and p′⊕q′=(a′+c′,b′+d′)p'\oplus q'=(a'+c',b'+d'). Rearranging by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §associative and using (†)(\dagger),

(a+c)+(b′+d′)=(a+b′)+(c+d′)=(b+a′)+(d+c′)=(b+d)+(a′+c′),(a+c)+(b'+d')=(a+b')+(c+d')=(b+a')+(d+c')=(b+d)+(a'+c'),

so p⊕q∼p′⊕q′p\oplus q\sim p'\oplus q' by (∗)(\ast).

Product: p⊗q=(ac+bd,ad+bc)p\otimes q=(ac+bd,ad+bc), p′⊗q=(a′c+b′d,a′d+b′c)p'\otimes q=(a'c+b'd,a'd+b'c) and p′⊗q′=(a′c′+b′d′,a′d′+b′c′)p'\otimes q'=(a'c'+b'd',a'd'+b'c'). First, p⊗q∼p′⊗qp\otimes q\sim p'\otimes q: multiplying the first equation of (†)(\dagger) by cc, and its reverse b+a′=a+b′b+a'=a+b' by dd, and expanding by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §distributive and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative,

ac+b′c=bc+a′candbd+a′d=ad+b′d;ac+b'c=bc+a'c\qquad\text{and}\qquad bd+a'd=ad+b'd;

adding these and rearranging by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §associative,

(ac+bd)+(a′d+b′c)=(ad+bc)+(a′c+b′d),(ac+bd)+(a'd+b'c)=(ad+bc)+(a'c+b'd),

which is p⊗q∼p′⊗qp\otimes q\sim p'\otimes q by (∗)(\ast). Second, p′⊗q∼p′⊗q′p'\otimes q\sim p'\otimes q': multiplying the second equation of (†)(\dagger) by a′a', and its reverse d+c′=c+d′d+c'=c+d' by b′b', and expanding in the same way,

a′c+a′d′=a′d+a′c′andb′d+b′c′=b′c+b′d′;a'c+a'd'=a'd+a'c'\qquad\text{and}\qquad b'd+b'c'=b'c+b'd';

adding these and rearranging,

(a′c+b′d)+(a′d′+b′c′)=(a′d+b′c)+(a′c′+b′d′),(a'c+b'd)+(a'd'+b'c')=(a'd+b'c)+(a'c'+b'd'),

which is p′⊗q∼p′⊗q′p'\otimes q\sim p'\otimes q' by (∗)(\ast). As ∼\sim is transitive, p⊗q∼p′⊗q′p\otimes q\sim p'\otimes q'.

Negation: ⊖(p)=(b,a)\ominus(p)=(b,a) and ⊖(p′)=(b′,a′)\ominus(p')=(b',a'), and by (∗)(\ast), ⊖(p)∼⊖(p′)\ominus(p)\sim\ominus(p') means b+a′=a+b′b+a'=a+b', the first equation of (†)(\dagger) reversed.

Order: by (∗∗)(\ast\ast), p⪯qp\preceq q means a+d≤b+ca+d\le b+c, and p′⪯q′p'\preceq q' means a′+d′≤b′+c′a'+d'\le b'+c'. By Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §order, a+d≤b+ca+d\le b+c if and only if (a+d)+(b′+c′)≤(b+c)+(b′+c′)(a+d)+(b'+c')\le(b+c)+(b'+c'). Rearranging by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §commutative and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §associative and using (†)(\dagger) (in the form c′+d=c+d′c'+d=c+d'),

(a+d)+(b′+c′)=(a+b′)+(c′+d)=(b+a′)+(c+d′)=(a′+d′)+(b+c),(a+d)+(b'+c')=(a+b')+(c'+d)=(b+a')+(c+d')=(a'+d')+(b+c),

and (b+c)+(b′+c′)=(b′+c′)+(b+c)(b+c)+(b'+c')=(b'+c')+(b+c). So a+d≤b+ca+d\le b+c if and only if (a′+d′)+(b+c)≤(b′+c′)+(b+c)(a'+d')+(b+c)\le(b'+c')+(b+c), which by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §order holds if and only if a′+d′≤b′+c′a'+d'\le b'+c'. Hence p⪯qp\preceq q if and only if p′⪯q′p'\preceq q'.

Passing to the quotient. By the compatibility of ⊕\oplus and Compatible Operations, Maps and Relations Pass to the Quotient §operation, there is exactly one binary operation ++ on P/∼P/{\sim} with [p]+[q]=[p⊕q][p]+[q]=[p\oplus q] for all p,q∈Pp,q\in P. As pp and qq run through PP, (p,q)(p,q) runs through the pairs ((a,b),(c,d))((a,b),(c,d)) with a,b,c,d∈Na,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}, and (a,b)⊕(c,d)=(a+c,b+d)(a,b)\oplus(c,d)=(a+c,b+d); so this condition says exactly that [a,b]+[c,d]=[a+c,b+d][a,b]+[c,d]=[a+c,b+d] for all a,b,c,d∈Na,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}. Hence ++ exists and is unique. In the same way, Compatible Operations, Maps and Relations Pass to the Quotient §operation applied to ⊗\otimes gives the unique ⋅\cdot with [a,b]⋅[c,d]=[ac+bd,ad+bc][a,b]\cdot[c,d]=[ac+bd,ad+bc], and Compatible Operations, Maps and Relations Pass to the Quotient §map applied to ⊖\ominus gives the unique map x↦−xx\mapsto-x with −[a,b]=[b,a]-[a,b]=[b,a]. Finally, Compatible Operations, Maps and Relations Pass to the Quotient §relation applied to ⪯\preceq gives a relation ≤\le on P/∼P/{\sim} with ([p],[q])∈≤([p],[q])\in{\le} if and only if (p,q)∈⪯(p,q)\in{\preceq} for all p,q∈Pp,q\in P, that is, by (∗∗)(\ast\ast), with [a,b]≤[c,d][a,b]\le[c,d] if and only if a+d≤b+ca+d\le b+c for all a,b,c,d∈Na,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}; and it is unique, since by (∗∗)(\ast\ast) every relation on P/∼P/{\sim} with the latter property has the former, and the relation with the former property is unique by Compatible Operations, Maps and Relations Pass to the Quotient §relation.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…